la chemioterapia. razionale, efficacia e futuro alessandro ......palmanova 24 maggio 2017. lung...
TRANSCRIPT
La chemioterapia.Razionale, efficacia e futuro
Alessandro Follador
Palmanova 24 maggio 2017
Lung cancer is a complex disease
Travis; JTO 2015
Lung cancer is a complex disease
Pao, Lancet Oncol 2011
Lung cancer is a complex disease
31
25
17
7
3
22
22
44
1UnkwnonKRASEGFR sensitizingALKMETHER2ROS1BRAFRETEGFR otherNTRK1; PI3KCA; MEK>1 Mutation
Adapted from Tsao; JTO 2016
majority of patients do not haveactionable mutations/driver oncogenes
Lung cancer is a complex disease
Tracking the Evolution of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer, Jamal-Hanjani, NEJM 2017
Squamous
Adenocarcinoma
Lung cancer is a complex disease
Somatic mutation frequencies observedin exomes from 3.083 tumour
Lawrence; Nature 2103
Lung cancer is a complex disease
• genetic changes, different pathways
• relationships with surrounding stromal cells
• specific target(s)
• mechanisms of resistance
• not easy to reproduce in preclinical studies
Epidemiology
Incidenza e proporzione sul totale dei tumori (esclusi i carcinomi della cute)
Cause di morte tumorali più frequenti e proporzione sul totale dei decessi oncologici
Airtum, I numeri del cancro in Italia 2016
Epidemiology
Airtum, I numeri del cancro in Italia 2016
Numero di nuovi tumori stimati per l’anno 2016 nelle singole Regioni italiane per le principali sedi tumorali, per il totale (esclusi gli epiteliomi)
Opzioni di trattamento
SurgeryRadiotherapy
Systemic therapy
• Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies
• monoclonal antibodies/Tki/ /intracellular pathways/ other
mechanisms involved in cell functioning
• Antiangiogenic drugs/ targeting vascular endothelial
growth factor
• Immune checkpoint inhibitors:anti PD-1 or PD-L1
Supportive drugs
Antiemetics
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors
Antibiotics
Bisphosphonates
Theoretical bases for chemotherapy
Pharmacokinetics [what happens to a drug]
Absorption – Distribution – Metabolism – ExcretionDetermining the dosing frequency, interactions…
Pharmacodynamics [the pharmaceutical effects on the patient]
target and the mechanism of action of the drug tumor response as a pharmacodynamic effect
Cytotoxic therapy
CT disrupts basic cellular processes
CT works because cancer cells have developed greater dependencies on these processes than normal cells
All CTs are targeted agents.We just lack a clear understanding of their targets in cells.
Theoretical bases for chemotherapy
• Skipper–Schabel–Wilcox log-kill model 1964
• Goldie-Coldman hypotheses 1973
• Gompertzian model
• Norton-Simon hypothesis 1988
Theoretical bases for chemotherapy
Detectable tumors are at least 10^9 cells
Tumor cells acquire spontaneous mutations
Despite response [PR or CR], resistant clone expands
Give multiple drugs at once or cycle non-crossresistant regimens
Theoretical bases for chemotherapy
Combination chemotherapy
• maximal cell kill with "acceptable" toxicity
• close to the maximum tolerated dose
• drug-free breaks in between cures to recover from the treatment-related toxicities
• synergistic model(s)
• prevent and/or slow the development of resistance
sCombination chemotherapy
Clinical trial(s)
Phase 0: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new drug/ preclinical toxicology studies; mechanism of action, relationships between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodymics, biomarker assay
Phase I: dose finding
Phase II: activity
Phase III: efficacy and safety
Phase IIIb-IV: post-marketing surveillance
Chemotherapy in NSCLC
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group BMJ 1995
…We also need studies to determine whether particular molecular characteristics of tumors identify subsets of patients likely to benefit from chemotherapy..
Chemotherapy vs no treatment, stage IV
~ 19000 stage IV patient pairs
median OS9.3 vs 2.0 months, p < 0.0001
David; JTO 2016
Adjuvant
LACE Pooled Analysis \ Pignon, JCO 2008
overall HR of death 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82- 0.96)
5-year absolute benefit 5.4%
LA-NSCLC: chemoradiotherapy
Auperin; JCO 2010
1st line NSCLC/Sq wt
Novello, Annals of Oncology 2016
1st line NSCLC/NSq wt
Novello, Annals of Oncology 2016
2nd line NSCLC/Sq wt
Novello, Annals of Oncology 2016
2nd line NSCLC/NSq EGFR+
Novello, Annals of Oncology 2016
Driver di scelta per trattamento
Performance status, age, comorbidities
Histologic subtype: NSCLC NonSq / NSCLC Sq
Molecular testing: molecular profiling to find driver event• EGFR [activating mutations: ex19 del or ex 21 (L858R)]*
• ALK\ROS1 [ALK fusion oncogene ALK-EML4, rearrangement ROS1]
• BRAF V600e [mutation]
PD-L1 testing [expresion expression positive (≥50%, 1st line) and EGFR, ALK, ROS1 negative or unknown]
* 15% ex 21 (L861), ex8 (G719X, G719), ex 20 (S768I
1st line: EGFR M+
Mok; NEJM 2009
1st line: EGFR M+
Mok; NEJM 2009Rosell; Lancet 2012Sequist; JCO 2013
1st line: ALK +
Solomon, NEJM 2014
mPFS10.9 vs 7.0 months
Schiller, NEJM 2002Grossi; The Oncologist 2009
1st line: platinum doublets + 3rd gen
Odds ratios for response
Odds ratios for progression
Schiller, NEJM 2002
1st line: platinum doublets + 3rd gen
1st line: cis vs carbo vs platinum doublets
Ardizzoni; J Natl Cancer Inst 2007
1st line: paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab
Sandler; NEJM 2006
mOS 12.3 vs 10.3
mPFS 6.2 vs 4.5
1st line: istology NonSq
Scagliotti; JCO 2008
1st Line: elderly
Quoix; Lancet 2011
mOS 10.3 vs 6.2 months1year survival 44.5 vs 25.4 %Median age 77 yrs
1st line: platinum doublets + 3rd gen
Rossi; Lancet Oncol 2014
Maintenance
Ciuleanu; Lancet 2009Paz-Ares; JCO 2013
2nd line/Subsequent Systemic Therapy
Shepherd; J Clin Oncol 2000Nasser Hanna JCO 2004
1-00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.05.010.015.020.0
SurvivalDistrib
utionfunctio
n
Pemetrezed (n=265)Docetaxel (n=276)
Hazard Ratio
MST8.3mo7.9mo
0.99(95%CI:0.8-1.20)
1-yr29.7%
2nd line/Subsequent Systemic Therapy
Reck;Lancet Oncology 2014
docetaxel + nintedanib
2nd line/Subsequent Systemic Therapy
Brahmer, NEJM 2015
nivolumab
1st line Platium doublets• overall response rate: 25 – 35%
• time to progression: 4 – 6 months
• median survival: 8–10 months
• 1-year survival rate: 30 – 40%; 2-year survival rate: 10 – 15%
• Cis/pem > efficacy & < toxicity (vs Cis/gem) in NonSq
• Cis/gem > efficacy (vs Cis/pem) in Sq
• Symptom control & > quality of life (vs best supportive care)
• single-agent therapy in select patients
• BSC for unfit patients OR ECOG performance status 3 – 4
Clinical issues
Valutazione della risposta ai trattamenti
Quality of LifeLung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)EORTCFACT-L
Clinical Benefit
Patient Reported Outcomes
Palliative [supportive] care
Temel, NEJM 2010
Drug interaction
http://udine.terap.it/
Drug interaction: herbal medicine
http://udine.terap.it/
potentially negative effects
direct toxic effects
interactions with anticancer drugs
Renal & Hepatic Dysfunction/ Dose Adjustment
Hendrayana; Sci. Pharm. 2017
Renal & Hepatic Dysfunction/ Dose Adjustment
Hendrayana; Sci. Pharm. 2017
Cispaltin and antitumor immunomodulation
de Biasi Clin Cancer Res. 2014
Metronomica
Munzone & Colleoni Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015
Old Drugs / New Packages
• Nanoparticle formulations: liposomes, polymeric micelles, protein-drug nanoparticles, and dendrimers
• Different pharmacokinetic properties
• Passive tumor targeting [permeability and retention effect]
• Different toxicity profiles and drug distribution
• Eliminate the need for using emulsifying excipients
• Active molecular tumor targeting, environment-sensitive drugrelease
Old Drugs / New Packages
Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel
Socinski, JCO 2012Shukuya; Lancet Oncol 2015
Nedaplatin
Old Drugs / New Packages
Antibody-drug conjugate
Local Therapy
…intrapericardic, intratecal, intrapleural hyperthermicchemotherapy, locoregional approach…
«alternative» drug / targets
Fillimore; Nature 2015Saxena; Oncologist 2015 Keith; Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology; 2013
Theoretical models
Benzekry, Semin Cancer Biol 2015
Combo PD-1/Chemoterapy
Langer , Lancet Oncology 2016
Keynote021
Conclusioni
Relevant part of the therapeutic armamentarium for lung cancers
Improves overall survival in adjuvant setting
Enhance curability in individuals with locoregional disease when combined with surgery or irradiation
Improves lung cancer symptoms, quality of life, time to progression and survival in palliative setting
Conclusioni
• Terapie di combinazione
• Strategia terapeutica
• Nuovi farmaci
• >> efficacia & << tossicità
• Biomarkers predittivi
Conclusioni
Virtually all patients with A-NSCLC will be consideredfor chemotherapy at some point in their illness
one – size – fits – all approach -> precision medicine
grazie per l’attenzione