labor and employment relations association annual meeting st. louis, missouri june 7, 2013

10
Workers' Compensation: Recent Development by John F. Burton, Jr. Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

Upload: lesley-harrington

Post on 03-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

Workers' Compensation: Recent Development

by John F. Burton, Jr.

Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting

    St. Louis, Missouri

    June 7, 2013

Page 2: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

John F. Burton, Jr.

Professor Emeritus

Rutgers University and Cornell University

A Definitive Introduction to Workers’ Compensation in 900 Seconds

Page 3: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

Workers and Employers Generally Dissatisfied with Tort Suits

Workers Had to Bring Tort Suits against Employers for Work Injuries Prior to Workers’ Compensation

Page 4: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

New Jersey and Wisconsin were the initial states to enact workers’ compensation statutes in 1911

U.S. Supreme Court interpretation of Commerce Clause precluded a federal law covering private sector and state and local government workers as of 1911

Although the constitutional limits on a federal program for private sector workers changed in the 1930, almost all private sector workers currently are covered by state workers’ compensation programs and there are no federal standards for these state programs

Workmen’s Compensation Statutes Were Enacted by States

Page 5: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

Workers injured on the job do not need to prove that employer is negligent

Workers’ compensation is exclusive remedy for workers for work-related injuries and diseases

◦ Workers can only receive benefits prescribed by workers’ compensation statute

◦ Workers cannot bring tort suits against employers (with very limited exceptions)

Workers’ Compensation Principle

Page 6: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

Figure AWorkers’ Compensation Benefits Paid by Type of Insurer,

in 2010

Source: NASI (2012: Table 4) .

Page 7: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

Figure B Workers' Compensation Benefits and Costs per $100 of Covered Wages,

1980–20101

98

0

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

0.96 0.971.04 1.05

1.091.17

1.231.29

1.34

1.46

1.571.65 1.65

1.531.47

1.351.26

1.17 1.13 1.121.06

1.10 1.13 1.16 1.131.09

0.990.95 0.97

1.02 0.99

1.76

1.671.58

1.50 1.49

1.64

1.791.86

1.94

2.04

2.18 2.16 2.132.17

2.05

1.83

1.66

1.49

1.38 1.35 1.341.43

1.57

1.71 1.70 1.71

1.56

1.45

1.331.29

1.23

Benefits

Employer Costs

Source: National Academy of Social Insurance estimates.Benefits are payments in the calendar year to injured workers or to providers of their medical care.Costs are employer expenditures in the calendar year for workers' compensation benefits, administrative costs, or insurance premiums. Costs for self-insuring employers are benefits paid in the calendar year plus the administrative costs associated with providing those benefits. Costs for employers who purchase insurance include the insurance premiums paid during the calendar year plus the payments of benefits under large deductible plans during the year. The insurance premiums must pay for all of the compensable consequences of the injuries that occur during the year, including the benefits paid in the current as well as future years.

Page 8: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

Figure C Share of Medical and Cash Benefits, 1960-2010

19

60

19

61

19

62

19

63

19

64

19

65

19

66

19

67

19

68

19

69

19

70

19

71

19

72

19

73

19

74

19

75

19

76

19

77

19

78

19

79

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Medical Benefits

Cash Wage Replacement

Perc

enta

ge s

hare

Source: National Academy of Social Insurance

Page 9: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

10.7

17.7

32.1

18.2 17.9

5.3

-3.1

1.8

-7.6

1.90.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

1959-1965 1965-1970 1970-1975 1975-1980 1980-1985 1985-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 2011

Figure DWorkers’ Compensation Statutory Benefits Changes,

1959-2011

Source: Burton and NCCI 2012.

Page 10: Labor and Employment Relations Association Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri June 7, 2013

Sources of Data:

www.workerscompresources.com