laboratory testin6 swry report tire chip … · coefficient of permeability (constant head. falling...

LABORATORY TESTIN6 S W R Y REPORT

TIRE CHIP EVALUATIOH PERHEABILITY AH0 LEACtlABILITY

ASSESWENTS

ADDEHDUH HO. 24-NR

PERFORHED FOR:

Waste 14anagement of North America, I n c . Northeast Region EPID O f f i c e 1121 Bordentown Road t 4 o r r i s v i l l e , PA 19067

PERFORHED BY:

J&L T e s t i n g Company, Inc. 938 South Central Avenue Canonsburg, PA 15317

J & L TESTING COMPANY, INC. -- . . .- .

GEOTECHNICAL. GEOMEMBRkNE. GEOTEXTILE AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIhLS TESTING AND RESE4RCH

Play 31, 1989

Job No. 89R414-01 Addendum No. 24-NR

Waste Management of Worth America, Inc Northeast Region EMD Office 1121 Bordentown Road Morrisville, PA 19067

Attention: Mr. Anthony W . Eith, P.E. Manager - Engineering Services

R E = SUMMARY REPORT TIRE CHIP EVALUATION PERMEABILITY A N D LEACHABILITY ASSESSMENTS

Gentlemen:

Presented herein are the results of our test program assessing the use of tire chips as a lower drainage medium in municipal landfills.

LEACHABILITY EVALUATION

As part of our test program the potential for tire chips to release contaminates when exposed to leachate was assessed. TO evaluate the potential, leachate column tests were performed using leachate from the Lakeview Landfill.

The test procedure involved the placement of tire chips in leachate columns (8" diameter x 48" long) and controlling the flow of leachate through the tire chips. Analytical tests were performed o n the leachate prior to exposure to the tire chips and at prescribed time intervals on effluent leachate samples after exposure to evaluate changes in the constituents. The tests were performed in two ( 2 ) columns at temperatures of 23'~ and 50'~. Figure 1 presents a schematic of the leachate column apparatus. Approximately 45 gallons of leachate passed through each column over a 90-day period. Leachate samples were extracted at 0 (raw isachate), 30. 6 0 and 9 0 day intervals. Analytical tests were performed to obtain the follorling parameters over this time period:

Mr. Anthony W. Eith, P.E. Page -2- Nay 31, 1989

P h Reactivity Cyanides Sulfides

EPA Tox-Metals Arsenic Lead Barium Mercury Cadmium Selinium Chromium Silver

Two laboratories were retained to perform the analytical testing. NUS Corporation was responsible for the raw leachate sampled 2-27-89 and the 3 0 day tests and Lancy Environmental Services was responsible for the raw leachate sampled 4-13-89 and the 6 0 and 9 0 day tests.

A summary of Analytical Test Data is presented in Table 1. As indicated, no appreciable changes in concentrations occurred through the 9 0 day period.

PERMEABILITY TESTING

The purpose of this test was to assess the vertical permeability of randomly placed tire chips under various normal loads representative of waste overburden stress scenarios.

Testing was performed in accordance with ASTM 0-2434 using water as a pore fluid. Initially, four (4) tests were conducted at stresses of 2,500 psf, 5,000 psf, 10,000 psf and 15,000 psf using fresh tire chips.

Following our purchase of a higher capacity loading system, test stresses of 0 , 2,500 psf, 5,000 psf, 10,000 psf, 15,000 psf and 20,000 psf were applied to the sample prior to permeability testing. It is pertinent to note that the tire chips placed in the permeameter in February for the initial test phase were maintained saturated and under a load of approximately 3,000 psf until testing in April using the new equipment.

To adequately evaluate the possible degradation of the tire chips exposed to leachate, permeability testing was performed on the samples removed from the leachate columns. Total leachate exposure time was approximately 114 days.

M r . A n t h o n y U. E i t h . P . E . P a g e - 3 - May 3 1 . 1 9 8 9

0 The t i r e c h i p s r e m o v e d f r o m t h e 50 C l e a c h a t e c o l u m n a r e

b e i n g m a i n t a i n e d ( s a t u r a t e d ) a t a l o a d o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 3 . 0 0 0 p s f t o e v a l u a t e a n y e x t e n d e d t e r m e f f e c t s . As o f May 3 0 . 1 9 8 9 n o chi::><e i n p e r m e a b i l i t y w a s e v i d e n t . We w i l l h o w e v e r p e r i o d i c a l l y p e r f o r m p e r m e a b i l i t y t e s t i n g o f t h i s s a m p l e a n d r e p o r t t h e d a t a i f t h e t h e v a l u e s c h a n g e f r o m t h o s e p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n .

D a t a s h e e t s t i t l e d , " C o - e f f i c i e n t o f P e r m e a b i l i t y " p r e s e n t i n g t h e a c t u a l p e r m e a b i l i t y t e s t d a t a a n d a p p l i c a b l e p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n A p p e n d i x A . T a b l e 2 p r e s e n t s a s u m m a r y o f t h e p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s d a t a . T h e e n c l o s e d F i g u r e 3 i n c l u d e s i l l u s t r a t i o n s o f l o a d v s . p e r m e a b i l i t y a n d l o a d v s . s t r a i n f o r e a c h o f t h e t e s t s .

we a p p r e c i a t e t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o p r o v i d e W M N A w i t h o u r s p e c i a l i t y s e r v i c e s i n t h e s e h i g h l y c r i t i c a l a r e a s o f r e s e a r c h .

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s r e g a r d i n g t h e e n c l o s e d d a t a , p l e a s e c a l l .

S i n c e r e l y ,

N G COMPANY, I N C . J&z?r~ D e a n E . F e-r,f' M a n a g e r - G e o t e c h n i c a l R e s e a r c h &

/ D e v e l o p m e n t

TABLES

- - 3.05 3 d 2

I S 3 1 AVO 06

10'0)

10'0)

2000'0)

1.0)

CO'O

POO.O>

60 '0

10 '0

01>

0.2)

E'L

- - - - 3.05 3.C2 3.05 3.E2

1531 AVO 09 I S 3 1 AVO OC

VIVO 1531lV3l lAlYHV JO A1IY)bPIS

1 310VI

S W R Y OF PHYSICAL PROPERTIES PERHEABILITY TEST SAHPLES

WPLE NOML WEIGHT VOLUlE DENSITY IDEHTIFICATIOH LoAD (psf) (m) (an]3 (pcf)

Test Date: 2500 33.0 28,248 49.7

2-13-89 5000 27.9 23,882 58.8

(Water) 10000 24.1 20,630 68.1

15000 22.9 19,602 71.6

Test Date: 0 28.2 24,139 58.2

4-26-89

(Water)

Test Date: 2500 22.9 19,602 47.5

5-22-89 5000 19.7 16,863 55.2

(Leachate F m m 10000 17.1 14,638 63.6

Column @ 23°C) 15000 15.2 13,011 71.5

20000 14.6 12,598 74.5

Test Date: 2500 24.1 20,630 47.3

5-23/24-89 5000 22.1 18,918 51.5

(Leachate From 10000 19.3 16,521 59 .O

Column @ 50°C) 15000 18.0 15,408 63.3

FIGURES

TNPEj lATURE CONTROC TO MAINTAIN

SOT EXPOSURE TRIP.

- 'TIRE CHIPS

FIGURE 1

LEACHATE COLUMN APPARATUS SCHEMATIC

mmow -.---'ill PlPE

SAMPLE t

O M R R O W /- PlPE

55 GALLON DRUM

(LEACHATE)

FIGURE 2

PUMP

CONSTANT HEAD PERMEABIUTY APPARAmS SCHEMATIC

T E S T RESULTS

T IRE CHIP P E R M E A B I L I T Y

0 BOO0 1 2 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

I 0 4OUO 8 0 0 0 12000 15

LOAD losf l LEGEND -

TEST DATE: 2-13-89 A LEACHATE COLUNN AT 23°C

! TEST DATE: 4-26-89 II LEACHATE COLUHN AT 50DC

3 0 2 0 0 0 0

FIGURE 3

APPENDIX A

COEFFICIENT O F PERMEABILITY (Constant Head. Fal l ing Head)

project T i r e Chip Eva lua t ion Job N ~ . 89R414-01

Locat ton of Project U:'INA

Descript ion of Soi l Chipped T i r e s 8 Tested by OEF Date o f Testing 2-13439

Conslunr l f c o d 33.0 cn 33.0 cm : HI. : Area 856 cm2 : Val, 28,248 cm3 M o l d dirnenstons: Diam.

= --- Wt. o f mo ld t gasket + base

--- WI. of mo ld+ gasket + base+so i l = - Wt. of soi l =%

24,498 gi,

1, = 69 cm

Unit wt. 49.7

PC[

Test do lo ~~~l datU NORI4AL STRESS = 2,500 psf

F o l l i n ~ Hcod

Standptpe = [burette. other (specify)]

Area o f standptpe, o = s q c m

I I I I t I I

Tcsr dorob Test da ta used

Average

'Use averaged values only 11 there is a small dtlference in test temperature. say. I-2%. 'This lest can be considerably simplified by uslng the same values 01 h , and h2 each tlme. otherwise. you cannot

average lhese values regardless of T.

(16.324 cm3) 33.0 cn

k , = QLIAht = (856 cm2 x 16.9 sec) 69 cm 1.3012 d*& = - - 5.4 x 10-1 crnlsec k,, = kmrtn:. = 7.0 x 10-1 crnlsec

" 6 .g 16,324 10

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (Constant Head. Fal l ing Head)

Prolect T i r e Chip Eva lua t ion Job No, 89R414-01

L o c a r ~ o n of Project hWNA

Desc r i p t~on of So i l Chipped Tires 8 O E F Date of Test ing 2-13-89 Tested by

- --- Wt. o l mo ld+ gasket+ base -

--- Wt. o f m o l d s gasket+ base+soi l = - Wt. of so11 - - 24,498 gm

I , = 69 cm

Test dnto Test dotu used liorrnal S t ress = 5.000 p s f

F a l l i n g Heud

Standpipe = [burette. other ( spec~ fy ) ]

Area 01 standpipe. o = sq c m

Test dotub Test data used

Average"

*Use averaged values only 81 there IS asmall diflerence In test temperature. say. 1-2°C. bThis lest can be consderably srmplilied by usmg %he same values 01 h , and h, each llme. otherwtse. you cannot

average these values regardless of T.

J B L TESTING COMPANY m a*oncnn,rr, ,.*,.no

116,324 cm3) 27.9 cm = (856 cm2 x 19.0 sec) 69 cm r - T)71%0 =

1.3012

- - 4.1 x 10-1 crnlsec kZB = kmrm0 = , 5.3 x 10-1 crnlsec

19.0 16,324 10

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (Constant Head. Falling Head)

T i re Chip Evaluation Job N ~ , 59R414-01 Project

Location of Project WMNA

Description of Soil Chipped Tires 8 OEF Date of Tesling 2-13-89

Tested by

Constont Heod

Mold dirnenslons: Diarn. 33.0 cm : HI. 24 '1 cm : Area 856 cmZ . Val, 20,630 cm3

Fnll ing Heod - Standpipe = [burette. other (specify)]

Area of standpipe. a = sq crn

Wt. of mold+ gasket+ base - - --- ---

Unit wt. 68.1

WI. of mold+ gasket+ base+soil = P C ~

WI. o f soil - 24,498 gm -

I, = 69 cm

Test doto ~~~t data used Normal Stress = 10,000 psf

Test dntob Test dota used

"Use averaged values only $1 there is asmall difference in test temperature. say. 1-2°C. &Thbs test can be considerably sunpltlled by uslng the same values ol h , and h, each tlme. othenv~se. you cannot

average thesevalues regardless ol T.

Test NO

1

2

3

4

J 8 L TESTING COMPANY a Geol.cnn<rrl Texbnv

(16,324 cm3) 24.1 cm

~,=QL/,i,,t= (856 cm2 x 35.0 sec) 96 cm 7rh0 = 1.3012 - - 1.9 x 10-I crnlsec L,, = k,qriq,, = 2 . 5 lo'' cm/sec

1. sec

35.0 Average '

r. sac

34.1

34.7

36.2

0. cu crn

16,324

T. 'C

10

0. cu cm

16,324

16,324

16,324

T. 'C

10

10

10

Test No.


T i r e Chip Eva lua t ion Job No, 89R414-01 Project

Locat ion o f Project W!#lA

Descript ion of Soi l Chipped Tires a Tested b y OEF Date o f Testing 2'13-89

Constant Heod Molddimenslons:~iam. 33.0 cm . n,, 22.9 cm . Area 856 cm2 . vol. 19,602 cm3

- --- Wt. o f moldi gasket + base - WI. 01 mo ld - gaske l i - base t so i l = --- - Unit wt. 71.6

pcf

Wt. Of so11 - - 24,498 gm

I, = 69 cm

Test da ta Test duta used t l o r m a l Stress = 15.000 sf

F a i i i r l ~ Heod

Standpipe = [burette. other (speci fyJ l -

Area o l standpipe. a = sq c m

Test datab Test dota used

- k,, = kr?r/~tu = - cmlsec

*Use averagedvalues only i t there 1s asmall difference ln lest temperature. say. 1-PC. 'Ths test can be considerably smplil ied by uslng the same values of h, and h: each time. otherwse. you cannot

average lhese values regartlless of T.

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (Constanl Head. Falling Heed)

Project T i re Chip Evaluation j o b NO. 89R414-01

ti^^ of project Yaste Hanagmnt of North America, Inc. @ Description of Soil Tires

Tested by DEF Date of Testing 4-26-89

Consrnnr Head

Molddimens~ons: Diarn. 33-0 un : HI. cm : Area : Vol. 123"

- --- Wt. o i mold i gasket + base -

--- 58.2 Wt, 01 mold+ gasket+ base+soil= Unit wt. pcf

Wt. Of $011 - 22498 9m -

1, = 69 un TOTAL STRAIH = 0

NOML STRESS = 0 Test datn Test dutu used

Terr No 1 r sec 1 O.cucm 1 J. 'C I Tesl No. I 1. sec I O.cucm I T:C

Fnl l ing Ncod

Staodpipe = [burette. other (specify)]

Area o i standpipe. a = sq cm

Test dnta* Test data used

Average

( Average ( I 1 1

*Use averaged values only 11 there is a small difference in test 1e.mperaIure. say. 1-2°C. L T h ~ ~ lest can be considerably stmplhed by usmg the same values of h, and h: each tlme. otherwise. you cannot


J16324 cm3) 28.2 an

k, = QLl..\hr = (856 un2 x 15 sec) 69 cm ? h : 0 = 0.9761

- - 5.2 x 10-1 crntsec , = , = 5-1 10-I crnlsec

15

J 8 L TESTING COMPANY m G.o,.mn,c.l rc,,,ng -

16324 21


Pro,ecl T i re Chip Evaluation Job No. 89R414-01

of Project Waste Hanagrment of North k r i c a , Inc.

Descrjplion of Soil Tires 8 Tested by DEF Date of Testing 4-26-89

Conston1 Hrod

Mold dimenslons: Diarn. 33.0 ; HI. un ; Area 856 ; Vol. 22427 --- Wt. o l mold + gasket + base - = ---

Wt. o l mold- gasket+ base+soil = - ~ n i t wt. 62.6 P C ~

WI. of soil = 22498 qm

1 , = 69 Total St ra in = 7.22

Nonnal Stress = 2500 psf

I ; , = QL/Aht = (856 anz x 17 sec) 69 un 77~1):~ = 0.9761

- - 4.3 x 10-1 cmlsec k:, = km,l,,, = 4.2 x 10-1 cmlsec

Test dato Tesl dutu used

Fnllinfi Heod Standpipe = [burette. other (specily)]

Area of standp~pe. o = sq cm

"Useaveraged values only if there is asmall difference in lest temperature, say. 1-2°C. Thm test can De considerably stmplilied by using the same values of h, and h, each lime. otherwise. you cannot

average tnese values regardless Of T.

116324 an3) 26.2 an

I . sac

17

Test No.

Test dotob Test doto used

J & L TESTING COMPANY m 0.ol.rnn.c.l Tall,". -

Average '

T. 'C

21

0. cu crn

16324

!. scc Test No. T. 'C

21

0. cu cm

1 1 17

2

3

4

Average

Test no.

16324

h,. ~m

Test no

1

2

3

4

h.. . crn

1

S ~ C

h. .

cm O..,.

cucm a,..

w c r n 0,. ern

T. 'C

1.

sec T. T


T i r e Chip Eva lua t ion j o b NO. 89R414-01

~~~~~i~~ of project Waste Hanaqement o f Ho r th k r i c a , Inc.

Descript ion o f So i l Chipped Tires Bb Tested by DEF Date o f Test ing 4-26-89

Constant Ifcad

M o l d dimensions: Diam. 33.0 an : HI. 24-6 on : Area 856 on' : Vol. 21058

Wt. o f mo ld + gasket+ base - - --- --- Wt. of mo ld + gasket + base+ soi l = ~ n i t w t . 66-7 P C ~

Wt. of soi l = 22498 gm T o t a l S t r a i n = 12.69:

1, = 69 m Hormal Stress = 5000 p s f

Test dota TESI dulu used

Folli~re Heod Standpipe = [burette. other (specify)]

Area o f standpipe. o = s e c m

Test datob Test dato used

Average '

'Use averaged values only il there is asrnall dillerence in lest temperature. say. 1-2°C. GThcs lesl can be considerably sirnplilled by usmg the same values of h, and hl each llrne. otherwse. you cannol

average thesevalues regardlessof T.

J 8 L TESTING COMPANY

/52\ G.rn.rn".C* k t . " .

a 6 3 2 4 on3) 24.6 m

k , = QL/Aht= (856 onZ x 20 sec) 69 an 7 ) ~ 1 % 0 =

0.9761

- - 3.4 x 10-1 cmlsec kza = k , ~ , / m = 3.3 x 10-1 c m ~ s e c

20 16324 21

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABlLlTY (Constant Head, Fall ing Head)

Project T i re Chip Evaluat ion j o b NO, 89R414-01

Locat iono~project Uaste Hanagnoent o f North America, Inc.

Description of Soil Chipped T i res @ Tested by DEF Date of Testing 4-26-89

Conston: Heod

Mold dimensions: Diam. 33.0 : Ht. 23.1 m : Area : Vol. 19774 w3

- - --- Wt. of mold- gasket + base

--- Unit wt.

71.0 Wt. of mold + qasket+ base + soil = - PC1 .

Wt. of soil - - 22498 grn

1, = 69 cm Total St ra in = 18.0%

Normal stress = 10,000 psf

Test doto Test dutu used

(16324 cm't 23.1 cm I I I I

k , = QLlAht = (856 mZ x 42 scc) 69cm d n ; o =

0.9761

- - 1.5 x 10-1 cmlsec k z o = km,/q,* = 1.5 x 10-I cmlsec

Folline Heod

Standpipe = [burette. other (speciiy)]

Area o l standpipe. o = sq c m

Test dntob Test doto used

T e r l No

1

2

3

4

-Use averaged values only i f there is a small d!llerence in tesl temperature. say. 1-2'C. "h15 test can be considerably s~mplified by using the same values at h, and each lime. otherwise. you cannot

average these values regaraless of T.

I. S ~ E

42

J & LTESTING COMPANY G.or#carnJ lor,,".

0. cu cm

16324

Averase '

0. cu crn

42

T. 'C

16324

I . ses

21

T. 'C

21

Test NO.


Prolect Tire Chip Evaluation Job No. 89R414-01

L~~~~~~ prolect Waste Hanagemnt of Horth Amrica, Inc.

Descrtptmn of Sot1 Chipped 8 Tested by DEF Date of Testtng 4-26-89

Cor~stant Hcod

Mold dirnensrons: Diam. 33.0 un : : Area 856 : Vol. 18918 un3

Wt. of mold + qasket+ base - - --- - --- Wt. ot mold+ gasket+ base+ soil = - ~ n i t wt. 74.2 P C ~

WI. of sot1 - - 22498 gm

1, = 69 an

Test data

TOTAL STRAIN = 21.65 H O W L STRESS = 15,000 psf

Test dutu used

Fall ine Hcad

Standpipe = [burette. other (specify)]

Area of standptpe. o = sq cm

Test No

Average "

Test datab Test data used

I Average / I I I

I. set T. 'C

21

116324 un3) 22.1 un

I ; , = QL/;\ht = (856 unZ x 131 sec)69 on m l % o = 0.9761

4 .7 x 10-2 cmlsec k:, = kmdq,, = 4 .6 x cmlsec

131 16324

'Use averagedvalues only i f there is asmall dzllerence In rest temperature. say. I-2'C. This lest can be considerably slmplilied by usmg the same values of h , and h, each lime. othemlse. you cannot

average tnese values regardless of T .

r. 5ec 0. CY cm

1 1 131

2

1 1

Test No.

21

J 8 L TESTING COMPANY -a G.0l.rn"l~il I.,,.".

16324

0. cu cm T. 'C

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABlLlrY (Constant Head. Falling Head)

Project T i r e Chip Evaluation Job NO. 89R414-01

Location Project Yaste flanagemtnt of North Amrica, Inc.

Descrjption of Soil Chipped Tires @ Tested by DEF Date of Testing 4-26-89

Consrant Head

Mold dimensions: Oiarn. 33.0 : Ht. 20.6 cm : Area 856 un2 . 17634 on3

Wt. 01 mold gasket + base - - --- . ---

Wt. of mold+ gasket+ base tso i l = - ~ n i t wt. 79-6 PC1

Wt. 01 so11 - - 24498 gm Total St ra in = 27Z

I , = 69 un Hormal Stress = 20,000 psf

Test dota Test dutu used

Falling Head


Area of standpipe. o = sq cm

AverageD

Test dorob Tes t data used

Tesl No

I Average / I I I

Q. cu cm t.sec

(16324 on3) 20.6 cm k , = QL~,~~,, = (856 un2 x 1160 sec) 69 un d%* = 0.9761

- 4.9 x 10-3 - crnlsec k,s = k , ~ , , , ~ = 4.8 x lo-3 crnlsec

1160

*Use averaged values only 11 there ts a small dllterence in test lemperalure say. 1 4 % 'Ths tesl can be considerably slmplllled by using the same values of h, and h: each tlme. otherw!se. you cannol

average tnese values regardless of T.

I 1 1200 1 16324

J 8 L TESTING ~ a m s r n n ~ s . ? COMPANY nmnp

21

16324

T. 'C

21

Tesl No. I . sec 0. cu cm T. 'C


Project T i r e Chip Eva lua t ion job NO. 89R414-01

Locat ion o f Project mHli Descript ion o f So i l

Chipped T i r e s 23°C A

Tested b y Date o f Test ing 5-22-89

Constonl Head

M o l d dimensions: Diam. 33.0 un : H1 22-9 ; Area 856 cmZ : Vol. 19602 c d

- --- Wt. o f m o l d + gasket + base - Wt. of m o l d + gasket + base + soi l = --- - u n i t wt. 47.5 Pcf

Wt, of so i l - - 14914 gm To ta l S t r a i n = 311

I, = 69 on Normal Stress = 2500 p s f

Falling Head

Test d o f u Test dotu used

Test dataa Test data used

'Use averaged values only i f there is asmall dillerence In test temperature. say. 1-2'C. &This lest can be considerably simplified by using the same values o l h, and h, each time. othemise. you cannot

average these values regardless o l T.

T. 'C

21

Test No.

1

2

3

4

(16324 d) 22.90 an = QLtAl,t = (856 cm2 x 69 m) 13 sec. qrl-a =

0.9761

- - 49 x 10-1 cmlsec k , , = k m h o = 4.8 x 10-1 cmtsec

I. aec

14

12

13

T. 'C

21

21

21

16324

0. cu cm

16324

16324

16324

Average' 13

0. cu cm Test No. I . sec

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (Constant Head, Fal l ing Head)

T i r e Chip Eva lua t i on Job NO. 89R414-01

Locat ion o f Project LMNA

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ , ~ ~ of soil Chipped T i m s 23°C A Tested b y OEF O a k of Testing 5-22439

Wt. of mo ld + gasket + base - - --- ---

Wt. of mo ld+ gasket+ b a s e t s o i l = - Unit wt. 55.2 PCf

Wt. o f soi l - - 14914 gin To ta l S t r a i n = 401

I , = 69 un Nonnal Stress = 5000 p s f

Test doio Test dot" used

Tesl No Test No.

- 3.4 x 10-1 - cmlsec k,, = k,q , lq: , = 3.3 x 10-I cmlsec

L scc

Average '

Follirig Head

Standpipe ;= [burette. other (specify)]

Area o f s tandp~pe. a = s q c m

Test doiob Test dnta used

I I I I. LBC

1

Average

0. cu crn

d ~ z o = 0.9761

16

*Use averaged values only $1 there is asmall difference in test temperature. say. 1-2'C. &This lest can be constderably slmplilied by using the same values of h, and h, each time. otherwise. you cannol

average lhesevalues regardless of T.

T. 'C 0. cu cm

17 1 16324

T. 'C

21

16324 2 1


Tire Chip Evaluation Project Job No. 8913414-01

Location of Project YHHn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ of soil Chipped Tires 23°C A

Tested by DEF Date of Tesling 5-22-89

Constunt Hcod

Mold dimensions: Diam. 33.0 un I H,, l7 ; Area : Vol. 14638 cn? Wt. o f mold + gasket + base - - ---

Wt. of mold+ gasket+ base+soil = --- - ~ n i t wt. 63-6 Pcf

Wt. of soil - - 14914 gm Total St ra in = 481

1, = 69 cm Normal Stress = 10000 psf

Test doto Test dufo used

- - 2 .0 x 10-1 cmlsec L,, = l iflr~n,a = 2.0 x 10-1 cmlsec

Tesi No.

1

2

3

4

Average'

Foiling Mead

Standpipe = [burette, other (specily)]

Area of standpipe. a = sq cm

Test dotoa Test dafo used

Average

r S ~ C

24

2 3

24

116863 cn?) 17.1 un A, = Q ~ ~ ~ J , ~ = (856 unz x 69 un) 24 sec.

7 l r I m = 0.9761

24

*Use averaged values only 11 there is a small dillerence in test temperature. say. 1-2°C. &This lest can be considerably simplilied by using the same values ol 11, and 1,: each tame. otherwise. you cannot

average these values regardlessof T.


-0 Geolcmn,rat rnmp

0. cu cm

16863

16863

16863

-

16863 - -

21

T. 'C

21

21

21

Tesl No. (. sec 0. cu cm T. 'C


Project T i r e Chip Eva lua t i on Job No. 89R414-01

Locat ion of Project Yn*

Descript ion of Soi l Ch iwed T i r e s 23°C A Tested b y DEF Date of Tesl ing 5'2249

C o w t o n f Heod

Mold dimensions: Diam. 33-0 : HI. 15-' un : Area a% a,z : Vol. 13011 Cn?

WI. 0 1 m o l d + gasket + base - - --- WI. o f mo ld i gasket + base + soi l = --- - Unit wl. 71.5

pc f

Wt. 01 soi l - - 14914 gm To ta l S t r a i n = 54%

1, = 69 un Normal S t ress = 15000 psf

Test d a f o Tesf dutu used

k , = QLIAht = (856 un2 x 69 un) 73 sec. 7 ? ~ 1 % 0 = 0.9761

- - 5.9 x 10-2 cm/sec , = , = 5.8 cmlsec

Average'

Folling Head

Standpipe = [burette, other (specify)]

Area of standpipe, o = s q c m

Test datab Test data used

Test No. 0. cu cm ! . se t

(16863 ad) 15.2 on 73

"Use averagedvalues only i f there is asmall dtllerence in tesl temperalure say. 1-2'C LThrs test can be considerably s,rnpld!ed by usmg the same values of h , and h: each tlme. olherwlse. you cannot


J 8 LTESTING COMPANY

-0 Glolarnnl.4l ,.,,,np

T. 'C Terl No.

16863 21

T. *C

! .sec

Tesl no

Test no.

h , . . cm

h:. cm

n,. cm

0. cu cm

T. 'C

4 cm

T. 'C

I

sac I.

sec On..

cu cm 0.. .

cucm

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (Constanl Head, Falling Head)

Prolecl T i re Chip Evaluation Job N~ 8311414-01

Location of Project LMHA

Description of So11 Chipped T i res 23°C A

Tested by DEF Date of Testlng 5-22-89

constant l I~ . f ld

Mold dimensions: Diam. 33-0 : HI. 14.6 cm : Area 856 : Vol. 12498 d Wt. of mold - gasket + base - - ---

Wt. o l mold i gasket + base + soil = --- - Wt. of soil

1, = 69 cm

unit wt. 74-5 P C ~

Total St ra in = 56% Normal Stress = 20,000 psf

Test doto Test d ~ r u used

Tesl No

1

2

3

4

Foiling l leod



Test datab Test doto used

Average"

I Average I I I I

t. rec

161

178

170

'Use averaged values only il there is asmall dillerence in lest te.mperalure. say. 1-2°C. Thls test can be considerably simplified by ustng the same values of h, and h2 each time. otherwise. you cannot

average thesevalues regardless of T.

116863 d) 14.6 cm

k , = QL1,ilrt = (856 cmZ x 69 on) 170 sec. W/%O =

0.9761

- - 2.5 x cmlsec k,, = km71~:o = 2.4 x 10-2 cmlsec

170

J8 LTESTING COMPANY Gs0l.cnnlc.l T..r.np

0. cu cm

16863

16863

16863

16863 21

7 .T T. 'C

21

21

21

1.58C Test No. 0. cu cm

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (Constant Head, Falling Head)

project T i r e Chip Evaluation Job No. 8911414-01

Location of Project - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ of soil Chipped 7 i t - e ~ 50°C ?4 Tesled by

DEF Date of Testing 5-23-89

Cor~s fon t Head . H ~ , 24.1 cm : 856 an2 . "01, 20630 cm3 Mold dimensions: D i a m 3 3 - 0 "

--- Wt. o f mold+ gasket + base - -

--- Wt. of mold+ gasket+ base tso i l = - ~ n i t wt. 47-3 Pcf

Wt. of soil - - 15621 gm Tot27 S t ra in = 27% 69 un Normal Stress = 25CO psf 11 =

Test data Test duto used

Falling Hcud

Standpipe = (burette. other (specify)]


Test dutnb Test dato used

TesI No

4

"Use averaged values only i f there is asmall difference in test temperature. say. 1-2°C. *The, test can be considerably simplified by using the same values of h, and hl each time. otherwise. you Cannot

average these values regardless of 7.

AverageD

J 8 L TESTING COMPANY G.oloinn.crl TI,ll"O

1. sec

116324 an3) 24.1 un

k , = QLIAIII = (856 cm2 x 69 an) 14 sec.

d % o = 0.9761

- - 4.8 x 10-I cmlsec Lao = L ~ r l q , ~ = 4.6 x 10-1 cmlsec

14

0. cu crn

16324

T. 'C Test No.

21

I. sec 0. cucrn I T . OC

COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (Constant Head, Falling Head)

project T i re Chip Evaluation Job NO. 89R414-01

Location o l Project MHA

Description of Soil Chipped T i res 50°C Ss

Tested by DEF

Date of Testing 5-24-89

Constunt Heod

Mo1ddmensions:Dmn. 33-0 an : HI. un : Area cm' : Vol. 18918 a?

Wt. o f mold - gasket + base - - --- Wt. of mold+ gasket+ base+soil = --- - ~ n i t wt. 51-5 P C ~

Wt. of soil - - 15621 gm Total St ra in = 334

11 = 69 un Normal Stress = 5000 psf

Foiling Heod



Test doto Test doru used

Test &tob Test doto used

TCSI NO.

1

2

3

4

Average

"use averaged values only il there IS a small dillerence in lest temperature. say. I-2'C. &This test can be considerably stmplified by using the same values of h, and hl each lime. otherwise. you cannot


1. sec

17

17

17

(16324 cd) 22.1 an

0. cu crn

16324

16324

16324

k,= QL/A/,, = (856 03' X 69 OD) 17 SeC. rho = 0.9761

- - 3 . 6 x 10-1 cmlsec k,, = k ~ , ~ l q ~ ~ = 3.5 x 10-1 cmlsec

Averageo

T . 'C

21

21

21

17

T e ~ l No.

16324

I . set

21

0. cu crn 7. 'C


Falling t l cad


Area of standpipe. o = - sq cm

Test dotnb Test data used

Project T i re Chip Evaluation job 89R414-01

Location of Project

Description of Soil Chipped Tires 50°C

Tested by OEF Date of Testing 5-24-89

C ~ m t n r l t Heod

Mold dimensions: Diarn. 33-0 un : H I 19-3 ; Area un2 ; Vo, 16521 un3 Wt. o f mold + gaske l t base - - ---

--- Wt. 01 mold + gasket + base+ soil = - Unit wt. P C ~ 59.0

Wt, of soil - - 15621 gm Total S t ra in = 42Z 11 = 69 un

. Total Stress = 10000 psf

Tcst doto Test dutu med

Tesl No.

1

2

3

4

'Use averaged values only i f there is a small diflerence in test temperature. say. l-2°C. LThe, lest can be consrderably s!mpld~ed by usmg the same values of h, and h, each time. olhenvlse. you cannot

average these values regardless ot T.


-0 G.OIaChniCaI 7cmn.

?. 5ec

23

25

25

24

Test no

116324 un3) 19.3 un

h,. crn

I; , = QL/Aht = (856 cm2 x 69 un) 25 sec. 0.9761 V T I V : ~ =

- - 2.1 x 10-1 crnlsec k,. = kmdv,. = 2.1 x 10-1 cmlsec

0. cu crn

16324

16324

16324

16324

16324

h,. . crn

a<.. c u m

Average 21

0. cu crn

T. 'C

hI. crn

Om,. c u m

T. %

21

21

21

21

25

T. T

Test no

I sec

h,. crn

T ~ S I no.

1 . sec

(. 5ec

1. ' C


Protect T i r e Chip Evaluation Job No. 89R414-01

Location of Project !"nM

Description of Soii Chipped 50°C

Tested by DEF Date of Testing 5-24:89

Cor~stont f lcod

Mold dimensions: Diam. 33.0 ; t . ; Area 856 cm2 ; Vol. 15408

WI. of mold+ aasket + base - - --- - Wt. o f mold + gasket + base + soil = --- - Unit wt. Pcf

63.3

Wt. of soil

I, = 69 un Total St ra in = 451 Nonnal Stress = 15000 p s f

-.. , A - . - - .. kT = QL/,,,rt = (856 unZ x 69 un) 86 sec. V7IT20 =

0.9761

- - 5.8 x 10-2 cmlsec k , , = kmd.r20 =

5.6 x cm/sec

Test No.

1

2

3

4

&!ling Elcud



Test dotob Test doto used

I. sec

83 '

82

93

87

I Average I I 1 I

'Use averaged values only il there is asmall diflerence in tesl lemperature, say. 1-2°C. LThls lest can be considerably slmplitied by using !he same values ol 11, and h, each time. otherwise. you cannol


0. cu crn

16324

16324

16324

16324


-0 Georemntcll 7.3c.nC.

T . "C

21

21

21

21

Test No. r.sec a. cu crn T. 'C


Project T i r e Chip Evaluation Job NO. 8911414-01

Location of Project mtol

Description of Soil Chipped Tires 50°C 28

Tested by DEF Date of Testing 5-24-89

Consfont )lead

Mold dimensions: Oiam. 33.0 un : Ht, 17.' : Area a"2 : Vol. 14980 ud

Wt. of mold + oaske l t base - - --- - --- Wt. o f mold+ gasket- base t so i l = - Unit wl. 65.1

PCf

WI. of Soil - - 15621 gin Total S t ra in = 471

= 69 cm Normal Stress = 20000 psf

Test dota Test dufu used

Terl No

Fnl l i r~p Heud



Average

Test dotab Test dofo used

L IEC

151 / 16324 1 21

7 1 / 7 ) 2 0 =

2.3aL~og 11,:11: = k , = - - - cmlsec

1 1 145 1 16324

(16324 c d ) 17.5 un

k , = QL/;\lrt = (856 un2 x 69 un) 151 sec. %I% = 0.9761

- 3.2 x 10-2 - 3.1 x 10-2 cmlsec crnlsec k,, = krnrm,, =

"Use averaged values only if there is asmall dillerence in test temperature. say. 1-2'C. 'Thm lest can be considerably slmplifaed by using the same values ol h , and / I , each tbme. otherwase. you cannot

average thesevalues regardless of 7.

0. cu cm

21

J & L TESTING COMPANY

m GIoieinn.rll T.,,,".

T.'C TesL No. I. sec 0. cu cm T 'C

$5 pm - 3:45 pm

ssion 16: Food Waste Diversion: A Session Developed by the US Composting Council !ssion 17: Using Technology to Improve Solid Waste Systems ys ion 18: Rural Recycling ession 19: California Futures

iession 20: Conversion Technoloeies " iess~on 21: Border Issues Session 22: Landiill Management

Session 16: Food Waste Diversion: A Session Developed by the US Composting Council

Waste character~zation studies consistently list lood material as the # I recyclable item sl~ll in the waste stream, even in areas with mature recycling programs This session will prol~le the innovative programs be~ng developed to collect and com- post lood residuals lrom the commercial and residential sectors

Session 17: Using Technology to lmprove Solid Waste Systems Effedive Use of the Internet in Presenting and Managing Your Company, Orit Crutchfield. Domoiex, lnc t i You Build It, Will They Come? Building Your Environmental Websile, Bob Barker. Env~ronmeniol Progroms Division. LA Counly Depl oiPub1;c Works, CA lntegrated Informalion Systems for Municipal Waste Management, Kevin Callen. GBB. inc

sion 18: Rural Recycling Rural Recycling: Profile of A Publir-Partnership. Harold G~nger~ch, NE hdiono Soiid kiiosre 114onogemenl Districr IN - A SWANA Gold Excellence Award Winning Program Regional EffoN Helping Rural Communities - Cooperative Recycling Helps Small Programs Think Big, Kathleen Jackson. ileodbvaieis Cooperorwe Recycling - Greenwaste Drop-o ff... If You Build It. They Will Come. Michelle M. Nichols, SCS Engineers

The followin foar sessions are sponsored by the Calfon~in Integrnted d a t e Mnnngenrent Bonrd (CIi,VAilBJ

Session 19: California Futures This session will review the accomplishmenis ol Californ~a local jurisd~ctions in responding to the 50 percent waste divers~on mandate 01 the lntegrated Waste Management Act ol 1989 (AB 939. Sher). Emerglng issues addressed in the Caiilorol,! lntegrated Waste Management Board's 2001 Siraieg~c Plan that w~l i help shape isaac management and maier~als handling in the luture - such as zero waste, oroduc: stewardship and e-wastes -will be d~scussed

Session 20: Conversion Technologies This session wl l explore the role that "conversion" technolog~es such as gasil~cation. hydrolysa, and anaerobic digestion can play in dlveiting more solid ivasic residuals lrom landlills. This will be accomplished through a panel session w h CIWMB stall. ~ndustry representatives, and !ocal government oflicials who wil! destr~bt coiiwoon technologies and provide updates on state policy anti on speoiic proieas

Session 21: Border Issues In th~s session presenters w~l l d~scuss the develooment ol integrated waste manage ment infrastructure in the US-Mexico Border Region cont~guous to Cal~fornia issues related to NAFR Maquiladoras, product packaging, waste management in Border c~iies, and ~nlrastructure development impact on Calilornia vvill be d~scussed

Session 22: Landfill Management This session will highlight recent developments in Iandliil rnanagement and environ. mental controls, ~vith a locus on the Calilornia-specilic MOLO coursc b e q p~loted through a pannersh~p benveen SWANA and the Calilornia Integrated Waste Management Board lor landlill operators as well as state and local permlttlnp and inspection personnel. Addit~onal top~cs w~l l include recenl landfill bioreaaoi ieseaicli and [he resulls of a cross-media study lhe Board commissioned 01 Calilornia M5W landlills to determine 11 current regulat~ons provide el ie~ive shon. and long-term environmental protection, and the potential lor landfill ielorrns

laboratory testin6 swry report tire chip … · coefficient of permeability (constant head. falling...

Documents