landslide hazard assessment on a site-specific scale...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to
Hellenic-Bulgarian border – (SciNet NatHazPrev Project)
Democritus University of Thrace (P1) Department of Civil Engineering
Geotechnical Division
M. Psaroudakis, Th. Lazaridis, El. Petala, J. Gkiougkis, I. Markou,
S. Skias and N. Klimis
![Page 2: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Activity 3.1:
Landslide Hazard Assessment (LHA) at a regional scale based on
the adopted/ adapted methodology
Scales:
Regional (1:250,000 to 1:25,000)
Local (1:25,000 to 1:5,000)
Site – Specific ( < 1:5,000)
Activity 3.4:
Slope stability analyses on natural and cut slopes in order to
propose preventive measures.
As defined in SafeLand project
(Corominas et al, 2013)
![Page 3: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Vertical Roadway Axis 75 (22.3km)
Komotini
Hellenic – Bulgarian
Borders
![Page 4: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Cut slopes O14-O15 : km: 13+940 – 14+400 N
Cut slopes
O14-O15
N
Komotini
Hellenic – Bulgarian
Borders
![Page 5: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Cut Slope O14 Cut Slope O15
N
Road Road
![Page 6: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The slope stability analysis was carried out by using the specialized
software GSTABL7 with STEDwin
This software has the ability of controlling automatically up to 5000
combinations of circular and polygonal plane surface of any shape, by
using limit equilibrium methods such as Modified Bishop, Simplified
Janbu etc.
In this case
It was used the modified Bishop method which uses the method of slices
to discretize the soil mass and determine the FS (Factor of Safety).
![Page 7: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Modified Bishop’s Method:
• Assume some failure surface
• Discretize failure surface into smaller elements (slices)
• Calculate factor of safety for each slice (strength/stress)
and overall factor of safety
• Find lowest FS for different failure surfaces
![Page 8: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Guidelines and Codes used:
The slope stability analysis was carried out using the most unfavorable
geometrical cross section according to ΟΜOE (Hellenic Guidelines for Highway
Engineering) and ΕΑΚ/2003 (Hellenic Seismic Code, 2003).
Those regulations are in accordance with the proposed by the US Ministry of
Transport Planning instructions (Federal Highway Administration Publication No.
FHWA-SA-96-069R)
Required Factors of Safety:
A/A Combination of Actions / Loads FS Required
1 Static (Permanent + Variable Actions / Loads) >1.40
2 Hydraulic (Permanent + Variable Actions / Loads + Extreme hydraulic conditions corresponding to an event with a mean return period of 50 years)
>1.30
3 Seismic (Static conditions + earthquake, Kh=0.08g, Kv= +0.04g) given that PGA=0.16g for the examined area
>1.0
Water Table or
ru= γw / γ (ratio of the pore pressure over the total normal stress)
![Page 9: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Natural Slope : Static Conditions
FSst =1.023 < 1.40
Silty sand
γ=22kN/m3
φ=32o
c=3.0 kPa
γ=27kN/m3
φ=42o
c=150.0 kPa
Gneiss
![Page 10: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
γ=27kN/m3
φ=42o
c=150.0 kPa
Gneiss (Aniso)
Geometry – Geology of
O14-14 cut slope
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
Silty sand
γ=22kN/m3
φ=34o
c=3.0 kPa
γ=27kN/m3
φ=30o
c=2.0 kPa
Gneiss (Aniso)
![Page 11: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Conditions: Static without any countermeasure
L1=20.0 kPa
FSst =1.142 < 1.40 !
Silty sand
γ=22kN/m3
φ=34o
c=3.0 kPa
ru=0.0
γ=27kN/m3
φ=30o
c=2.0 kPa
Gneiss (Aniso)
ru=0.0
![Page 12: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
FSst =1.565 > 1.40
Conditions: Static with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
L1=20.0 kPa
10.0m long nails / passive anchors
placed in 2.0x2.0 grid
Silty sand
γ=22kN/m3
φ=34o
c=3.0 kPa
ru=0.0
γ=27kN/m3
φ=30o
c=2.0 kPa
Gneiss (Aniso)
ru=0.0
![Page 13: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
FSw =1.342 > 1.30
L1=20.0 kPa
10.0m Long soil nails placed in
2.0x2.0 grid
Silty sand
γ=22kN/m3
φ=34o
c=3.0 kPa
ru=0.20
γ=27kN/m3
φ=30o
c=2.0 kPa
Gneiss (Aniso)
ru=0.15
Conditions: Hydraulic with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
![Page 14: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
FSs =1.345 > 1.0
L1=10.0 kPa
10.0m Long soil nails placed in
2.0x2.0 grid
Silty sand
γ=22kN/m3
φ=34o
c=3.0 kPa
ru=0.0
γ=27kN/m3
φ=30o
c=2.0 kPa
Gneiss (Aniso)
ru=0.0
Conditions: Seismic with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
![Page 15: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Komotini
Hellenic – Bulgarian
Borders
N N N
Cut Slope O21 : km: 16+640 – 17+080
Cut slope O21
![Page 16: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
N
Cut Slope O21, Section: 848
Road
![Page 17: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Natural Slope : Static Conditions
FSst =1.255 < 1.40
Silty sand
γ=22kN/m3
φ=32o
c=3.0 kPa
![Page 18: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Geometry – Geology of O21 cut slope
1.5
1.0 Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
c=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.0
![Page 19: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
FSst =1.272 < 1.40 !
Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
c=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.0
Conditions: Static without any countermeasure
![Page 20: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
FSst =1.409 > 1.40
Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
c=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.0
12.0m nails / rock anchors placed in
2.0x2.0m grid
Conditions: Static with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
![Page 21: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
FSw =1.308 > 1.30
Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
c=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.10
12.0m nails / rock anchors placed in
2.0x2.0m grid
Conditions: Hydraulic with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
![Page 22: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
FSs =1.30 > 1.0
Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
c=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.0
12.0m nails / rock anchors placed in
2.0x2.0 m grid
Conditions: Seismic with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
![Page 23: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
•Modulus of elasticity: 600 MPa
•Poisson ratio: 0.2
•Bulk modulus: 333 MPa
•Shear modulus: 250 MPa
•Friction angle: 36o
•Cohesion: 30 kPa
•Tension limit: 30 kPa
Parameters – Input data:
3D Geometry
O21 cut slope
![Page 24: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Conditions: Static – 3D Geometry convex cut slope
FSst_3D =1.24 < 1.27= FSst_2D
![Page 25: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Komotini
Hellenic – Bulgarian
Borders
N
Cut Slope O32 : km: 21+300 – 21+460
Cut slope O21
N
N
![Page 26: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Cut Slope O32, Section: 1096
Road
![Page 27: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Geometry – Geology of Cut Slope O32
1.5
1.0 Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
c=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.0
![Page 28: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
c=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.0
Conditions: Static without any countermeasure
FSst =1.278 < 1.40 !
![Page 29: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
FSst =1.434 > 1.40
Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
C=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.0
Conditions: Static with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
12.0m nails / rock anchors placed in
2.0x2.0 m grid
![Page 30: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
FSw =1.324 > 1.30
Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
C=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.10
12.0m nails / rock anchors placed in
2.0x2.0 m grid
Conditions: Hydraulic with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
![Page 31: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
FSs =1.287 > 1.0
Gneiss weak
γ=23 kN/m3
φ=36o
C=30.0 kPa
Ru=0.0
12.0m nails / rock anchors placed in
2.0x2.0 m grid
Conditions: Seismic with countermeasures (nails / passive anchors)
![Page 32: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
•Modulus of elasticity: 600 MPa
•Poisson ratio: 0.2
•Bulk modulus: 333 MPa
•Shear modulus: 250 MPa
•Friction angle: 36o
•Cohesion: 30 kPa
•Tension limit: 30 kPa
Parameters – Input data:
3D Geometry
O32 cut slope
![Page 33: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
FSst_3D =1.35 > 1.28= FSst_2D
Conditions: Static – 3D Geometry concave cut slope
![Page 34: Landslide Hazard Assessment on a site-specific scale ...scinetnathaz.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/LHA_Komotini-Nymfaia...scale: vertical road axis No75, Komotini-Nymfaia to Hellenic-Bulgarian](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051600/5ab0827d7f8b9a284c8b5ae9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
благодаря
mulțumiri
teşekkürler
Спасибі
Ευχαριστώ