larry boress executive director nawhc · state of the art roi and voi tools to meet expectations...

Click here to load reader

Upload: others

Post on 12-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Larry BoressExecutive Director

    NAWHC

    C opyright © 2018 N AW H C

  • 2

    Source: Willis Towers Watson

  • C opyright (c) N AW H C 2018

    Do you don’t know if your clinic has an ROI?

  • ◦ Preventive care Employees receiving

    appropriate screening as a percent of all eligible employees

    ◦ Program participation Participating employees as a

    percent of eligible employees◦ Utilization

    Employees receiving medical care as a percent of all employees

    ◦ Employee Satisfaction◦ With providers and services◦ Employee engagement

    Average health engagement survey score per employee

    }

    ◦ Health risks Number of health risks per employee

    ◦ Biometric screening Employees meeting clinical targets as

    percent of all employees◦ Chronic conditions

    Employees with chronic conditions as a percent of all employees

    ◦ Financial Total health-related program cost per

    employee/avoided ER visits◦ Lost time from work

    Number of lost workday equivalents per employee from health-related conditions

    ◦ Lost productivity-absences◦ Recruitment and Retention

    Improvement

  • Source: Willis Towers Watson

  • } Goal: Provide an objective approach to VOI• To create recommendations on performance metrics and

    methodologies in the financial, administrative, clinical and satisfaction areas

    • To promote the recommendations for use in RFPs, evaluation of the performance of clinics and to compare vendors offering similar services

    } Approach:• Literature search conducted to identify previous work on clinic

    performance evaluation• Surveys sent to members and others to determine how many are using

    various metrics, how they are defining and using them and if there are additional metrics to add

    • An online roundtable discussed the findings and core measures• A project committee made the final recommendations

    C opyright (c) N AW H C 2018

  • } Areas to measure:• Administrative• Financial• Clinical• Satisfaction

    } The number of measures and drill down is not the same for all employers or clinics:• Time frame measurement is to be done• Extent of services• Length of clinic existence• Interest in drilling down

  • } What should be in the numerator and denominator? It depends on:• Whether you want to look at the “%” or the “#” of people in a

    category• Whether you look at the employer’s:

    • Total population;• The population who is covered;• The population who is eligible to use the clinic; or

    • The population that actually uses the clinic• How a ”clinic patient” is defined

    } You need to decide on these at the start, as employers, vendors and providers have different definitions

    } Comparisons with other employers are difficult unless they agree on these elements in the calculation

  • Source: N BG H

    82%73%

    100%91%

    36%

    64% 64%

    27%

    100%

    FINAN

    CIAL

    CLIN

    ICAL

    IMPR

    OVEM

    ENTS

    PROG

    RAM

    PART

    ICIPA

    TION

    PATIE

    NT SA

    TISFA

    CTIO

    N/EX

    PERIE

    NCE

    BEHA

    VIORA

    L CHA

    NGE

    PREV

    ENTIV

    E CAR

    E PRO

    VIDED

    BIOME

    TRIC

    SCRE

    ENIN

    GS

    UTILI

    ZATIO

    N OF

    OUT

    SIDE S

    ERVIC

    ES

    UTILI

    ZATIO

    N OF

    CLIN

    IC SE

    RVIC

    ES

    (Source: NBGH)

  • *NAWHC 2016 Clinical Metrics Survey

  • *NAWHC 2016 Clinical Metrics Survey

  • *NAWHC 2016 Clinical Metrics Survey

  • *NAWHC 2016 Clinical Metrics Survey

  • 73%

    64%

    36%

    27%

    45%

    18%

    36% 36%

    55%

    45%

    Med

    ical

    cos t

    var

    ianc

    e

    ER v

    isit s

    avo

    ided

    or

    redu

    ced

    Phar

    mac

    y sa

    v ing

    s

    Gene

    r ic p

    resc

    r ibi

    ng ra

    te

    Spec

    ialis

    t car

    e av

    oide

    d

    Spec

    ialis

    t net

    wor k

    sav i

    ngs

    Case

    man

    agem

    ent s

    avin

    gs

    Hosp

    ital

    inpa

    tient

    sav

    ings

    Savin

    gs f

    rom

    risk

    red

    uct i

    ons

    Per M

    embe

    r Per

    Mon

    th

    Source: N BG H

  • 40%30%

    20%

    70%

    10% 10%

    30%

    0%10%

    20%30%40%50%

    60%70%80%

    Reducedinjur ies at

    w ork

    Reducedabsences

    Inc reas tedpro duct ivit y

    Saved t imeaway fr om

    w ork

    Reducedtur nover

    impr ovedret ent ion

    rate

    O ther

  • • Decide on your objectives for the center and plan to measure them• Create the measurement approaches you need to gauge success• Define and get agreement on your numerators and denominators from

    those responsible for reporting• Make sure your vendor/provider has the understanding of your

    objectives, measurement needs and reporting requirements and has state of the art ROI and VOI tools to meet expectations

    • Create performance guarantees with contractors based on your objectives and targets

    • Set expectations of senior management on VOI, not ROI, as cost savings and behavioral change could take 3-5 years

    • Use results for reporting to support increased resources for expanding and improving center services

    • Monitor reports for areas of improvement frequently• Make changes as needed

  • } Larry Boress} Executive Director} [email protected]} www.nawhc.org

    mailto:[email protected]://www.nawhc.org/