late complicatinos - lozenetz hospital · complications after large bowel resection. 2. strict...

1
Principles of low-rate complications in colorectal cancer patients with large bowel resections Penchev D, Vladova L, Dobrev G, Staneva D, Hamdiev M, Gornev R* Medical University - Sofia, Medical Faculty, IVth grade.Sofia University, Medical Faculty, Department of General Surgery Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common neoplasm of the gastro-intes nal system and the third most common cancer in the world[1,2] . The rate of complicaons in pa ents with CRC surgical procedures correlate with paents’ survival and quality of life[9]. Early and late complicaons depend on the speci c risk prole of paent with CRC[10]. It is important to create an algorithm in order to reduce complicaons’ rate in paents aer large bowel resecons[5,6,7]. AIM We aim to create an algorithm for reducing early and late complicaons in paent with CRC and large bowel resecon. Materials and methods For a period of ten years (2002-2012) 363 paents were operated with CRC in University Hospital “Lozenetz”, Department of General surgery. Paents were categorized according to variable tumor locaons and dierent type of surgical procedures. All of the paents had cancer staging, surgical planning, bowel preparaons, preoperave, intraoperave and postoperave work up - such as colonoscopy, intraoperave hermec test of anastomosis, ancoagulant and anbioc prophylaccs. Stascal analysis were done with SPSS 19 and using frequence, correlaon and comparave analysis. Baseline characteris cs Demographics N=363 Values Age (years), mean ± SD 67 ± 11 Sex, N (%) Male Female 208 (57,3) 155 (42,7) BMI,(kg/m 2 ), mean ± SD 25 ± 5 Algorithm of low rate complicaon in CRC N=363 Values Principles of oncological security % 100 General surgical principles (dreinage,haemostasis etc.) % 100 Hermec anastomoc test % 89 Anbioc prevenon (preoperave) % 98,5 Ancoagulant prophylaxis % 86,4 Large bowel preparaon % 97,7 Anbioc prevenon (postoperave) % 96 Addional intraoperave colonoscopy (in cases with low ware localizaon of the tumor) % 24,3 Topographic localizaon by AJCC 7 th edion 9,1 9,9 2 8,3 2,8 3,3 16,6 0 0 5,8 39,1 2,8 0,3 0,3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 22,3 8,2 0,8 23,4 13,5 4,4 10,4 8,8 0,3 1,6 6 0,3 Operave Intervenon TNM Cancer Staging by AJCC 7 th edion 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 I II a II b III a III b III c IV a IV b Clinical Pathologic Greading of the tumor N=363 (%) 1.GX 2.G0 3.G1 4.G2 5.G3 6.G4 7.G5 1. 0,5 2. 2,5 3. 3 4. 10,1 5. 58,3 6. 22,1 7. 3,5 Metastac disease Nodal metastasis N=363 (%) NX N0 N1 N1a N1b N1c N2 N2a N2b 1. 14,6 2. 35,1 3. 9,3 4. 4,4 5. 7,3 6. 2,4 7. 7,3 8. 5,9 9. 13,7 Organ metastasis (M) N=363 Liver metastasis (H) (%) М1a H1 16,3 8,6 М1b Hx 8,1 68,2 M0 H0 47,6 10,6 MX H2 7,8 2,5 H3 10,1 11% 89% Complicaon No-complicaon Complicaons N=363 (%) Infecons 3,3 Anastomoc leakage 2,8 Bleeding 1,4 Cardio-pulmonary 1,9 Obstrucon (perioperave) 1,9 Death 0 Early Complicaons 5% 95% Complicaon No-complicaon Complicaons N=363 (%) Residual tumor 4 Stricture 0 Obstrucon 0,5 Late complicaons Correlaons between postoperave stay and intensive stay in days Pearson Correlaon ,266 ** **. Correlaon is signicant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). P < 0,005 N=363 Mean + SD Max /min Mode Preoperave stay 3 days ± 3 days 0-17 days 1 day (40%) Postoperave stay 11 days± 6 days 3-52 days 8 days (18,8%) Intensive care 2 days ± 2 days 0 – 13 days 0 days (48%) Relaonship between complicaons and postoperave stay Blood transfusion N=363 P < 0,005 Early Late Intraoperave 13 % 5,2 % Perioperave 17 % 5 % Without 4 % 2,6 % Blood loss N=363 P < 0,005 Early Late 100 ml. 6,5 % 2,6 % 100-500 ml. 9 % 5,2 % > 500 ml. 31,6 % 5,2 % Relaonship between complicaons and blood transfusion and blood loss Operaon me N=363 P < 0,005 Early complicaons Late complicaons (0-180 min. ) 9,2 % 1,7 % (180-600 min. ) 11,5 % 4,3 % Co-morbidity N=363 P < 0,005 Early Yes 11,9 % No 2,1 % Relaonship between complicaons and co-morbidity and operaon me N=363 P < 0,005 In (%) of cases Without complicaons Without early complicaons Without late complicaons CPA in large bowel operaons 68 % 60,2 % 62,6 % 65,5 % CPA + addional intraoperave colonoscopy 22,1 % 19,3 % 19,9 % 21,1 % Complicaon prevenon algorithm (CPA) and complicaon rate 0 5 10 15 Early complicaons Early complicaons and anbioc prevenon Yes No 0 5 10 15 Early complicaons Early complicaons and ancoagulant prophylaxis Yes No 0 5 10 15 20 Early complicaons Early complicaons and large bowel preparaon Yes No 0 5 10 15 20 Early Late Early and late complicaons hermec anastomoc test Yes No Discussion In our study we analyze a package of peri-, intra- and postoperave procedures as means to reduce early and late complicaons in CRC surgery. The rate of early and late complicaons thoroughly depend on an algorithm that include principles of oncological security, general surgical principles, hermec anastomoc test, anbioc prevenon, ancoagulant prophylaxis, large bowel preparaon and addional intraoperave colonoscopy. David and Dietz report that the highest rates of anastomoc complicaons are aer coloanal anastomoses (10-20%) and wound infecons occur in 5-15% of paents following colorectal surgical procedures. The authors idenfy malnutrion, diabetes, immunosuppression and age greater than 60 years as risk factors for complicaons [9]. Kirchhoand all present analogical algorithm that include co-morbidity, blood loss, blood transfusion, age, obesity, operaon me and surgical experiencea nd point out that mechanical bowel preparaon is related to increased rate of postoperave infecon and anastomoc leakage. The average anastomoc leakage rate in most of the studies is between 2,9 – 15,3% and in our study anastomoc leakage is 2,8%. Conclusion 1. Operaon me, emergency operaons, co-morbidity, operave blood loss and size of operaon are specic risk factors for early and late complicaons aer large bowel resecon. 2. Strict follow up of an algorithm that include principles of oncological security, general surgical principles, hermec anastomosis test, anbioc prevenon, ancoagulant prophylaxis, large bowel preparaon and addional intraoperave colonoscopy is a reliable method for reducing early and late complicaon rate aer large bowel resecon. Reerences 1. World health organizaon (WHO)[internet]. Globocan world cancer report 2008[cited 20013]. Available from hp://globocan.iarc.fr/ 2. Dimitrova N, Vukov M, Valerianova Z. BULGARIAN NATIONAL CANCER REGISTRY 11 th edion AVIS-24;2012 3. Rozen P, Young GP, Levin B and Spann SJ.Colorectal cancer in clinical pracce,Early Detecon and management.N Engl J Med.2002 Jul;347(1):71-72 4. Markowitz SD, and Bertagnolli MM.Molecular Basis of Colorectal Cancer.N engl J Med.2009 Dec;361 (25):2449-2460 5. Townsend JR, Beauchamp RD,Evars BM, MaoxKL. Sabiston textbook of surgery 18 th edion Saunders Elsevier;2008 6. Brunicardi FC, Dana KA,Timothy RB, David LD,John GH, Jerey BM,et al., editors. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 9th Edion, New York: McGraw Hill; 2009. 7. Damianov D. Surgical oncology –modern standard Medart; 2009 8. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Tro A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7 th edion Springer;2009 9. American society of colon and rectal surgeons. Complicaons in Colorectal Surgery David W. Dietz, MD 10. Philipp Kirchho,Pierre-Alain Clavien , and Dieter Hahnloser Complicaons in colorectal surgery: risk factors and prevenve strategies. Paent Saf Surg. 2010; 4: 5. Specic risk factors for complicaons N=363 Values Operaon me (minutes) mean ± SD/mode 222 ±99/180 Emergency operaons % 6,3 Co-morbidity % 75 Lack of intes nal molity aer operaon % 14,5 Operave blood loss ml./ % Up to 100 ml/ 44,3 Up to 500ml/ 44,8 Above 500ml/ 10,9 Blood transfusion % Intraoperave Perioperave 21,8 34,5 Size of operaon % Only tumor resecon Mul-resecon operaon 69,1 30,9 0 20 40 60 80 100 (+)Late - (+)Early (-)Late - (+)Early (+)Late - (-)Early (-)Late - (-)Early 0 9 3 87 Combinaon of complicaons

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Late complicatinos - Lozenetz Hospital · complications after large bowel resection. 2. Strict follow up of an algorithm that include principles of oncological security, general surgical

Principles of low-rate complications in colorectal cancer patients with large bowel resectionsPenchev D, Vladova L, Dobrev G, Staneva D, Hamdiev M, Gornev R*

Medical University - So�a, Medical Faculty, IVth grade.So�a University, Medical Faculty, Department of General Surgery

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common neoplasm of thegastro-intestinal system and the third most common cancer in theworld[1,2] .The rate of complications in patients with CRC surgical procedurescorrelate with patients’ survival and quality of life[9].Early and late complications depend on the specific risk profile ofpatient with CRC[10].It is important to create an algorithm in order to reducecomplications’ rate in patients after large bowel resections[5,6,7].

AIMWe aim to create an algorithm for reducing early and late

complications in patient with CRC and large bowel resection.

Materials and methods

For a period of ten years (2002-2012) 363 patients were operated with CRC in University Hospital “Lozenetz”, Department of General surgery. Patients were categorized according to variable tumor locations and different type of surgical procedures. All of the patients had cancer staging, surgical planning, bowel preparations, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative work up - such as colonoscopy, intraoperative hermetic test of anastomosis, anticoagulant and antibiotic prophylactics. Statistical analysis were done with SPSS 19 and using frequence, correlation and comparative analysis.

Baseline characteristics

DemographicsN=363

Values

Age (years), mean ± SD 67 ± 11Sex, N (%)MaleFemale

208 (57,3)155 (42,7)

BMI,(kg/m2), mean ± SD 25 ± 5

Algorithm of low rate complication in CRC

N=363 ValuesPrinciples of oncological security % 100General surgical principles (dreinage,haemostasisetc.) %

100

Hermetic anastomotic test % 89 Antibiotic prevention (preoperative) % 98,5 Anticoagulant prophylaxis % 86,4Large bowel preparation % 97,7

Antibiotic prevention (postoperative) % 96

Additional intraoperative colonoscopy(in cases with low ware localization of the tumor) %

24,3

Topographic localization by AJCC 7th edition

9,1 9,9

28,3

2,8 3,3

16,6

0 05,8

39,1

2,8 0,3 0,305

1015202530354045

22,3

8,2

0,8

23,4

13,5

4,4

10,48,8

0,31,6

6

0,3

Operative Intervention

TNM Cancer Staging by AJCC 7th edition

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 I II a II b III a III b III c IV a IV b

ClinicalPathologic

Greadingof the tumorN=363

(%)

1.GX2.G03.G14.G25.G36.G47.G5

1. 0,5 2. 2,5 3. 3 4. 10,1 5. 58,3 6. 22,1 7. 3,5

Metastatic disease

Nodal metastasisN=363

(%)

NXN0N1N1aN1bN1cN2N2aN2b

1. 14,6 2. 35,1 3. 9,3 4. 4,4 5. 7,3 6. 2,4 7. 7,3 8. 5,9 9. 13,7

Organ metastasis (M)N=363 Liver metastasis (H)

(%)

М1a H1 16,3 8,6

М1b Hx 8,1 68,2

M0 H0 47,6 10,6

MX H2 7,8 2,5

H3 10,1

11%

89%

Complication No-complication

ComplicationsN=363

(%)

Infections 3,3

Anastomotic leakage 2,8

Bleeding 1,4

Cardio-pulmonary 1,9

Obstruction (perioperative) 1,9

Death 0

Early Complications

5%

95%

Complication No-complication

ComplicationsN=363

(%)

Residual tumor 4

Stricture 0

Obstruction 0,5

Late complications

Correlations between postoperative stay and intensive stay in daysPearson Correlation ,266**

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).P < 0,005

N=363 Mean + SD Max /min Mode

Preoperative stay

3 days ± 3 days 0-17 days 1 day (40%)

Postoperative stay

11 days± 6 days

3-52 days 8 days (18,8%)

Intensive care 2 days ± 2 days 0 – 13 days 0 days (48%)

Relationship between complications and postoperative stay

Blood transfusionN=363 P < 0,005

Early Late

Intraoperative 13 % 5,2 %

Perioperative 17 % 5 %

Without 4 % 2,6 %

Blood lossN=363 P < 0,005

Early Late

100 ml. 6,5 % 2,6 %

100-500 ml. 9 % 5,2 %

> 500 ml.31,6 % 5,2 %

Relationship between complications and blood transfusion and blood loss

Operation timeN=363 P < 0,005

Early complications Late complications

(0-180 min. ) 9,2 % 1,7 %

(180-600 min. ) 11,5 % 4,3 %

Co-morbidityN=363 P < 0,005

Early

Yes 11,9 %

No 2,1 %

Relationship between complications and co-morbidity and operation time

N=363P < 0,005

In (%) of cases Without complications

Without early complications

Without late complications

CPA in large bowel operations

68 % 60,2 % 62,6 % 65,5 %

CPA + additional intraoperativecolonoscopy

22,1 % 19,3 % 19,9 % 21,1 %

Complication prevention algorithm (CPA) and complication rate

0

5

10

15

Early complications

Early complications and antibiotic prevention

YesNo

0

5

10

15

Early complications

Early complications and anticoagulant prophylaxis

YesNo

0

5

10

15

20

Early complications

Early complications and large bowel preparation

YesNo

0

5

10

15

20

Early Late

Early and late complications hermetic anastomotic test

YesNo

DiscussionIn our study we analyze a package of peri-, intra- and postoperative procedures as means to reduce early and late complications in CRC surgery. The rate of early and late complications thoroughly depend on an algorithm that include principles of oncological security, general surgical principles, hermetic anastomotic test, antibiotic prevention, anticoagulant prophylaxis, large bowel preparation and additional intraoperative colonoscopy.David and Dietz report that the highest rates of anastomotic complications are after coloanal anastomoses (10-20%) and wound infections occur in 5-15% of patients following colorectal surgical procedures. The authors identify malnutrition, diabetes, immunosuppression and age greater than 60 years as risk factors for complications [9].Kirchhoff and all present analogical algorithm that include co-morbidity, blood loss, blood transfusion, age, obesity, operation time and surgical experiencea nd point out that mechanical bowel preparation is related to increased rate of postoperative infection and anastomotic leakage.The average anastomotic leakage rate in most of the studies is between 2,9 – 15,3% and in our study anastomotic leakage is 2,8%.

Conclusion1. Operation time, emergency operations, co-morbidity, operative blood

loss and size of operation are specific risk factors for early and late complications after large bowel resection.

2. Strict follow up of an algorithm that include principles of oncological security, general surgical principles, hermetic anastomosis test, antibiotic prevention, anticoagulant prophylaxis, large bowel preparation and additional intraoperative colonoscopy is a reliable method for reducing early and late complication rate after large bowel resection.

Refferences1. World health organization (WHO)[internet]. Globocan world cancer report

2008[cited 20013]. Available from http://globocan.iarc.fr/2. Dimitrova N, Vukov M, Valerianova Z. BULGARIAN NATIONAL CANCER REGISTRY

11th edition AVIS-24;2012 3. Rozen P, Young GP, Levin B and Spann SJ.Colorectal cancer in clinical practice,Early

Detection and management.N Engl J Med.2002 Jul;347(1):71-724. Markowitz SD, and Bertagnolli MM.Molecular Basis of Colorectal Cancer.N engl J

Med.2009 Dec;361 (25):2449-24605. Townsend JR, Beauchamp RD,Evars BM, MattoxKL. Sabiston textbook of surgery

18th edition Saunders Elsevier;20086. Brunicardi FC, Dana KA,Timothy RB, David LD,John GH, Jeffrey BM,et al., editors.

Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 9th Edition, New York: McGraw Hill; 2009. 7. Damianov D. Surgical oncology –modern standard Medart; 20098. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging

Manual 7th edition Springer;20099. American society of colon and rectal surgeons. Complications in Colorectal

Surgery David W. Dietz, MD 10. Philipp Kirchhoff,Pierre-Alain Clavien, and Dieter Hahnloser Complications in

colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient SafSurg. 2010; 4: 5.

Specific risk factors for complications

N=363 ValuesOperation time (minutes) mean ± SD/mode 222 ±99/180Emergency operations % 6,3Co-morbidity % 75 Lack of intestinal motility after operation % 14,5Operative blood loss ml./ % Up to 100 ml/ 44,3

Up to 500ml/ 44,8

Above 500ml/ 10,9

Blood transfusion %IntraoperativePerioperative

21,8

34,5

Size of operation %Only tumor resectionMulti-resection operation

69,1

30,9

0 20 40 60 80 100

(+)Late - (+)Early

(-)Late - (+)Early

(+)Late - (-)Early

(-)Late - (-)Early

0

9

3

87

Combination of complications