laura ingalls huntley office of science, suli program franklin & marshall college stanford...

11
Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006

Upload: edward-merritt

Post on 17-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006

Laura Ingalls HuntleyOffice of Science, SULI Program

Franklin & Marshall CollegeStanford Linear Accelerator Center

Menlo Park, California16 August 2006

Page 2: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006
Page 3: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006

• Consists of 19 layers of steel and particle detectors. Shapes magnetic field as well as provides identification for muons and neutral hadrons.

• Resistive Plate Chambers (RPCs) were initially installed, but their efficiency has decreased more rapidly than expected.

• Limited Streamer Tube (LST) installation began in the summer of 2004 and will conclude this fall.

Page 4: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006

• Designed by Iarocci in 1978. Is a widely used and understood techonology.

• Contain a gas mixture of 3% argon, 8% isobutane, and 89% carbon dioxide by volume.

• Gas is bought from an outside source and mixed on-site. Isobutane has contained impurities in the past that caused LST efficiency to decrease from ~ 90% to ~ 60%.

• We have been working on a small LST system to test the gas for contaminants.

Page 5: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006
Page 6: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006
Page 7: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006

• Consists of two 50.5 cm x 15.4 cm x 2.0 cm LSTs stacked one on top of the other.

• Cosmic muons are used instead of particles produced by an electron-positron collision.

• We are using a pre-mixed gas until test module is installed in gas shack.

• Impure gas was simulated by dropping the voltage in the LSTs below the optimum range (~ 5500 V).

Page 8: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006
Page 9: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006

High Voltage (HV) is inputted through four pins into the eight wires in each LST through an HV connector box . . .

Signals from the LSTs travel through capacitor to front-end electronics in the NIM bin.

Page 10: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006

• Counter 1 shows the total number of detections made by the inner two channels of the top LST.

• Counter 2 shows the number of coincidental detections made by both LSTs.

• The coincidence rate and the percent coincidence are measured.

Page 11: Laura Ingalls Huntley Office of Science, SULI Program Franklin & Marshall College Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Menlo Park, California 16 August 2006

• Test for basic performance show that our LSTs and electronics are functioning reliably. They show about 1.2 muon detections per square cm per minute, which agrees with literature values for a horizontal detector at sea level. They also show singles rate curves that have an edge at 5300 V and plateau at 5500 V.

•The coincidence rate has the advantage of not relying on the measurements made by a single LST (false detections due to x-rays, etc.). However, it requires the operator to manually time 5 minutes worth of counts. We have not measured it accurately as of yet.

• The percent coincidence has the advantage of being very simple to perform, although it also requires at least 5 minutes of counts before it can be considered sufficiently reliable. We have measured the percent coincidence to be approximately 47%.

• Both tests will most likely be used once the system is installed in the gas shack. Installation will begin once BaBar has gone offline.