lauren bartlett local human rights lawyering project director nelson mock human rights project...

40
LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the Human Rights in the U.S. Handbook for Legal Aid Attorneys: Housing Rights & Domestic Violence

Upload: brook-short

Post on 17-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

L A U R E N B A RT L E TTL O C A L H U M A N R I G H T S L AW Y E R I N G P R O J E C T D I R E C T O R

N E L S O N M O C KH U M A N R I G H T S P R O J E C T D I R E C T O R , T E XA S R I O G R A N D E L E G A L A I D

Introduction to the

Human Rights in the U.S. Handbook for Legal Aid Attorneys: Housing Rights &

Domestic Violence

Page 2: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Background on the Handbook

• Aims to get practical and useable human rights information into the hands of legal aid attorneys

• Principles used for drafting:• Simple language• Everyday use• Repetition

• Handbook is available for download on our website: (http://www.wcl.american.edu/humright/center/locallawyering.cfm)

Page 3: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Handbook Overview

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Page 4: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Part 5

Page 5: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Part 2

Provides Overview of:What are human

rights? What is human

rights law?How is human

rights law relevant to U.S. courts and U.S. policymakers?

Page 6: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Part 2 – Section 2.2 – Intl Conventions

Page 7: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Part 2 – Section 2.2 – Intl Conventions

Click on blue

hyperlinks

Page 8: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Part 3

Page 9: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Part 4 Human Rights Litigation in the U.S.

Page 10: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Part 4 - Section 4. 2 - Sample Arguments: How Human Rights Law Adds Value to Judicial

Interpretation

1. Some state constitutions may support, if not compel, looking to international law for legal interpretation of domestic law.

2. Human rights jurisprudence may offer precedent and models more on point for the case than anything in the federal system or sister states.

3. State courts should interpret U.S. law as consistent with international law whenever possible. See Murray v. The Schooner Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. 64 (1804).

4. Where there is no controlling U.S. law, state courts should look to customary international norms for guidance for its decision See Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 578 (2005).

5. State courts should be part of the transnational dialogue on human rights simply because it is a vital conversation that promotes universal values.

Page 11: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Part 5 – Specific Legal Issue Areas

Page 12: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

5.3.1 Introduction: Housing Rights.

Page 13: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

5.3.2 Quick Statistics & Resources for Data

Page 14: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

5.3.3 Relevant Human Rights Law

Page 15: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Relevant Law cont’d

Page 16: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Relevant Law cont’d

Page 17: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Relevant Law con’td

Page 18: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Relevant Law cont’d

Page 19: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

5.3.4 Sample Arguments

Page 20: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

5.3.5 Talking Points for Oral Arguments

Page 21: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

5.3.6 Case Studies of Legal Aid Attorneys

Page 22: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

5.3.7 Sample Briefs & Petitions

Click on blue

hyperlinks

Page 23: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

5.3.8 Other Resources

• Catchall section• Other human rights advocacy guides• Reports• Articles, blogs and other collections of relevant

resources

Page 24: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Building a Human Rights Argument

Know your forum…appropriate?

Decide why you are going to use the argument

Decide how you are going to use argument: Orally? Letter? Brief?

24

Page 25: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Building a Human Rights Argument

Make arguments based in local, state and federal law

Explain why human rights law is relevant to this court and this case

Introduce your “hook” to human rights law

Introduce human rights law itself

25

Page 26: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Specific Case Example

Housing case, Leo Belanger et al v. John Mulholland—tenants went 9 months without water and 5 months without functioning toilet.

Question: Does lack of water alone constitute a violation of the Warranty of Habitability Statute?

Tenants’ Argument to Supreme Judicial Court of Maine:

1. The lack of water alone violated the Warranty of Habitability Statute, because it is an essential feature of a habitable residence in Maine;

2. This standard is consistent with the national standards regarding right to adequate housing, water, and sanitation; and

26

Page 27: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Specific Case Example

(Belanger case)3. Then, human rights argument:

Where domestic Constitutional or statutory law is vague, courts have looked to treaties and international law for interpretive guidance. [Fn] “The opinion of the world community, while not controlling our outcome, does provide respected and significant confirmation for our own conclusions.” Roper v. Simmons, 125 S. Ct., 1183, 1200 (2005).

27

Page 28: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Specific Case Example

(Belanger case)

Then, referred to: Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural

Rights Commentary by various U.N. committees/bodies

regarding human right to adequate housing and safe drinking water

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“[e]veryone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family.”)

28

Page 29: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Specific Case Example

(Belanger case)

Human rights argument, concluded:

“The right to water is an essential cornerstone for realizing the right to an adequate standard of living as well as the right to health. …. Testimony describing the Belangers’ plight demonstrates a marked decline in the Belangers’ physical and mental health as a result of losing their access to running water. [Cite omitted.] Such deplorable conditions, which are not tolerated under international human rights standards, should not be allowed by Maine laws.”

Appellants’ Brief, p 18, Belanger v. Mulholland, 2011 ME 107 (Me. 2011) (emphasis added)

29

Page 30: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Building a HR & Domestic Violence Argument

Getting startedo Identify the potential human rights issueso Identify which materials may be relevanto Think about a possible “hook”

E.g. Implementing legislation as in refugee context

E.g. Local DV & human rights resolutions

Page 31: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

“Hook” to Human Rights Law: DV Context

Example 1: Refugee/Asylum Lawo Domestic laws based on ratified treaties

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees Convention Against Torture

o Congressional record makes this explicit Laws passed to bring U.S. into compliance Makes these treaties directly relevant

o Also a hook for considering other international materials Interpretations by relevant U.N. bodies Jurisprudence of sister signatories Regional treaties/cases based on the U.N. treaties Legitimates use of any international materials

Page 32: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

“Hook” continued

Example 2: Local DV & Human Rights Resolutions

Page 33: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

“Hook” continued

Resolutions shows that City Council recognizes: o DV is a human rights issue

o Highlights importance/severity of issueo Heightens the seriousness of the case

o Highlights governments’ role in protecting citizens’ rightso “Duty to protect women from DVo Recognizes the need to address systemic failures

that perpetuate VAW

o Citing multiple resolutions evidences growing trend in United States

Page 34: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

Building a HR & DV argument continued

o Also think about what your goal is in using international law and human rights principleso Different possibilities

Provide additional support to domestic law Help interpret new, ambiguous or conflicting

domestic law Help analyze situation that does not perfectly fit

under existing laws Challenge existing law

Page 35: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

HR & DV argument continued

Make arguments based in local, state and federal law

Explain why human rights law is relevant to this court and this case Introduce your “hook” to human rights law

Introduce human rights law itself

Page 36: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

HR & DV argument continued

Laying out argumento Possible “hook”o For example: The Miami-Dade Board of

Commissioners have recognized that freedom from domestic violence is a fundamental right. The Council has further recognized that under international law governments have a duty to protect women from domestic violence, and that a breach of this duty can constitute a violation of women’s right to equality.

Page 37: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

HR & DV argument continued

Define the rights at issueo Be expansive

Freedom from DV also tied up with rights to life, security, freedom from torture, equality, etc.

o Start with ratified treaties when possible For example: The ICCPR guarantees the right to

protection against arbitrary interference with one’s privacy, family, and home.

o In some cases, may need to start with non-binding materials to frame the argument accurately

Page 38: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

HR & DV argument continued

State what you are asking foro Emphasize international principles in tough case

Probably want to highlight U.S. obligations or international consensus

So your ask may be: Grant FPO in order to protect Petitioner’s freedom from interference in her privacy and home life

Calm the judge’s concernso Link to domestic jurisprudence if possible

Shows that what you are asking for is not outrageous, radical, unprecedented

If no DV cases on point, analogizing to domestic materials on other issues Example: Roper v. Simmons

Page 39: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

DV & HR argument continued

Page 40: LAUREN BARTLETT LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING PROJECT DIRECTOR NELSON MOCK HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR, TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID Introduction to the

For more information on Housing Rights & Freedom from Domestic Violence

Housing Rights webinarFreedom from Domestic Violence webinarOther resources all available at http://www.wcl.american.edu/humright/center/researchtools-coordinatedinitatives-handbooks.cfm