law of patents
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MONETISING innovations & business- an overview of IPR
![Page 2: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Law
MarketLab
![Page 3: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. 2007 brand valueReliance Industries Rs. 26801 CroresTCS Rs. 19592 Crores Indian Oil Corporation Rs. 17987 Crores. IOCLs brand value formed 40% of the company’s total value.
2. 2010 brand value of Google US $114250 Mn. Its brand is its strongest barrier to entry of competitors.
3. Nestle’s balance sheet 2009 discloses: Property, plant and equipment US $ 21 599 MnGoodwill and intangible assets US $ 34 160 Mn
4. Pfizer’s balance sheet 2009 discloses: Property, plant and equipment US $ 22 789 MnGoodwill and intangible assets US $ 110 391 Mn
![Page 4: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Agric
ultu
ral
Econ
omy
Knowledge growth was over
generations
tradesecrets
![Page 5: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Indu
stria
l Ec
onom
y
Capital controlled IP
Development of IP litigation
2 kinds of knowledge:
- Scientificdevelopment on
platforms
- Standardisation and rationalisation
![Page 6: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Know
ledg
eEc
onom
y
Use of IP – FTO-Business process IP- brand value - control over ownership
-Short life-cycle technologies-over-lapping innovation
-Software patents and increased IP complexity
![Page 7: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Crea
tive
Econ
omy
Creativity as the key driver- IP value independent of physical carrier-transform information-ideas to assets-human capital-in sourcing
Difficult to create, easy to infringe
![Page 8: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Producers and
consumers
corporations Flat world
Big corporations
Skilled People
Niche-driven
GreenExpertise
![Page 9: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ProducerAs
Consumer
Social networks
Mass consumption struggle for better share of benefits
Segmented markets
Aggregation of Apex
consumers
Information society
Aggregation of larger
communities of consumers
Network society (or
social networks?)
PROSUMER
![Page 10: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Monetisation
1. How do we transform Ideas to assets
2. How do we focus on monetisable IP?
![Page 11: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
"If you don't make things for your own surprise, you become like a baker, everyday making the same round bread to sell." Dasarath Patel, Co-founder of National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad
“In most people’s vocabularies, design means veneer. It’s interior decorating. It’s the fabric of the curtains of the sofa. But to me, nothing could be further from the meaning of design. Design is the fundamental soul of a human-made creation that ends up expressing itself in successive outer layers of the product or service.” – Fortune
“That’s not what we think design is. It’s not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works” – NYT, The Guts of a New Machine, 2003
![Page 12: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
STEPS IN AN IP STRATEGY
Asset identifica
tion
Prioritisation
Protection
Valuation
monetisation
![Page 13: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Prioritisation
core peripheral
Secondary Results of R&D
Shared IP
![Page 14: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Core:• produce• Protect• Replicate• Transfer• Translate • transport
Peripheral• License
out• License –
in to bundle
• Co-brand• Protect to
monetise
Secondary Results: • Assign• License
out• Protect
to monetise
Shared IPIdentify, value and protect Classify as core / not core
EXPECT THESE TO CHANGE OVER TIME
![Page 15: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Legal
Registration
Confidentiality
Technical
IT due diligence
Using technological innovations
PROTECTION
![Page 16: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1. Rights managed and royalty free images
2. < 100 mn images3. Bettman archives4. For revolving display of digital artwork
on digital frames5. Acquiring pics from pro-ams6. Privately owned company of Bill Gates
![Page 17: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The brand name for a range of precisely-cut crystal (a particular type of glass) and related luxury products produced by Swarovski AG of Wattens, Austria.
POETRY of PRECISION: Swarovski is the synonym for crystal.
In 1895, Daniel Swarovski pursued his dream of creating a crystal so perfect that it captured both the eye and the heart. .
![Page 18: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Swarovski, now the undisputed world leader in cut crystal has remained fully independent since its foundation in Wattens, Austria. The company employs 26,000 people and maintains a presence in more than 120 countries worldwide.
The company draws its richness of expression from the cultural heritage of Central Europe and its talents from forging links between the arts, science and economics. .
![Page 19: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
So Is IP about:
Monopoly or Collaboration
Necessary Cost or Desirable Investment
Risk management or Business Strategy
Enhancement of profit or Multiplying Revenue Streams
- A hut on the goldmine?
![Page 20: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Thank you.Let’s discuss…
Source: IP dome/ nalsarpro materials
![Page 22: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
What is a Patent ?
• Patent is an exclusive monopoly right given by the sovereign to an inventor for an invention
• An invention to be patented should fulfill the criteria of the patent legal regime of a country
• It is for a limited period of time (20 years)• To get the Patent the Inventor should disclose
the invention fully
![Page 23: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
– The What ?
• Exclusive monopoly to the inventor means to exclude any one from manufacturing, using or selling the invention during the period of the patent.(a negative right !)
• This exclusive right is only in the country(ies) in which the patent is granted.
![Page 24: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
What is not patentable
• Discoveries are not patentable
• Ideas are not patentable
• Laws of nature
![Page 25: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
What Can Be Patented
• New and useful• Process, • Machine, • Manufacture• Composition of matter, • Or any new and useful improvement thereof
![Page 26: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What ?
• Patents are granted for inventions “patentable” under the legal regime of a country based on -
• Novel- • New in the global context • not published• Worked• used –anywhere• This constitutes prior art
![Page 27: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Prior Art- everything made available to the public by means of:
PRIOR ART
![Page 28: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Determining Prior Art
Publicationany document from any source can in fact be used as
prior art. It does not matter in which language the document is
written, in how many copies it was made available, or whether any copies where in fact bought or read by third parties.
The only thing that matters is that the document was available to the public before the critical date.
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 28
![Page 29: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Determining Prior Art• Publicly available material
• It is irrelevant whether the public in fact accessed the document, or how easy it was to find the document.
• Publicly available products also count as prior art, even though it may be very difficult to determine exactly what the product is made of or how it works.
• If a device is put on the market before the patent application filed on a feature in that device, the feature is no longer novel
• If the product is not sold, but only demonstrated to the public, then only those features which the public could observe count as prior art.
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 29
![Page 30: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Determining Prior Art
• Oral disclosures• Oral disclosures, such as lectures or non confidential
discussions between the inventor and a third party, usually also count as prior art.
• The problem with oral disclosures is usually how to prove that they took place and what was disclosed exactly.
• In some cases a transcript or recording may be available.
• This can serve as evidence of what was orally disclosed, although establishing the date of the oral disclosure may still be difficult.
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 30
![Page 31: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Determining Prior Art Internet publications Internet publications are special case. As most patent offices
perform their search and examination several months after filing of the application, a search on the Internet will not be of much use.
In the intervening months pages on the Web may have been updated, added or removed, which makes it impossible to determine whether the invention was published on the Internet before the day of filing.
But if it can be proven that a web page with particular contents was publicly accessible the day before the filing date, then that web page will count as prior art.
A site such as The Internet Archive could be very useful in such cases
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 31
![Page 32: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
PRIOR ART -NOVELTY
• The prior art has to be from a single source
• Combination of prior arts cannot invalidate Novelty
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 32
![Page 33: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
What ?
Non- obvious- /Inventive StepShould not be obviousPerson skilled in the art will judge The patent examiner is the person skilled in
the art Should involve inventive stepSubject of many litigations
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 33
![Page 34: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Non Obviousness- Inventive Step
• Inventive step is a feature of an invention that involves technical advance
• as compared to existing knowledge or having economic significance or
• both, making the invention non obvious to a person skilled in art.
• Here definition of inventive step has been enlarged to include economic significance of the invention apart from already existing criteria for determining inventive step.
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 34
![Page 35: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Non Obviousness- Inventive Step• To judge the inventive step, the
following question is to be borne in mind-
• “Would a non-inventive mind have thought of the alleged invention?”.
• If the answer is “No”, then the invention is non-obvious.
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 35
![Page 36: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Obviousness
• Definition of one of ‘ordinary skill in the art’
• Combining two or more prior art references
• Motivation to combine• Some teaching, suggestion, or
motivation to modify or combine found either in the references themselves or in the knowledge generally available to one of ordinary skill in the art
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 36
![Page 37: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Obviousness• M/s. Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam
Appellant v. M/s. Hindustan• Metal Industries, “It is important that in
order to be patentable an improvement on something known before or a combination of different matters already known, should be something more than a mere workshop improvement; and must independently satisfy the test of invention or an ‘inventive step’.
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 37
![Page 38: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Obiviousness
• To be patentable the improvement or the combination must produce a new result, or a new article or a better or cheaper article than before. The combination of old known integers may be so combined that by their working interrelation they produce a new process or improved result. Mere collection of more than one integers or things, not involving the exercise of any inventive faculty, does not qualify for the grant of a patent.”
All rights Reserved Prof.vivek 38
![Page 39: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
What ?
• Industrial application-• Should demonstrate industrial utility
![Page 40: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Industrial Utility
• An invention is capable of industrial application if it satisfies three conditions, Cumulatively:
• Can be made;• Can be used in at least one field of
activity;• Can be reproduced with the same
characteristics as many times as necessary
![Page 41: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
The Test
• Novelty
• Utility
• Non-Obviousness
• Statutory Bar
• NUNS TEST
![Page 42: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
TYPES OF PATENTS
• PRODUCT
• PROCESS
![Page 43: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
–Who gets the Patent
• Inventor • Assignee of the Inventor• Any legal entity assigned by the inventor
![Page 44: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
INDIAN PATENT ACT
• NON INVENTIONS UNDER SECTION 3
![Page 45: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
The following are not inventions within the meaning of this Act,-
(a) An invention which is frivolous or which claims anything obviously contrary to well established natural laws;
![Page 46: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(b) An invention, the primary or intended use or commercial exploitation of which would be contrary to public order or morality or which causes serious prejudice to human, animal or plant life or health or to the environment;
![Page 47: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(c) the mere discovery of a scientific principle or the formulation of an abstract theory or discovery of any living thing or non-living substance occurring in nature.
![Page 48: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?(d) the mere discovery of a
new form of a known substance, which does not result in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that substance or the mere discovery of any new property or new use for a known substance or mere use of a known process, machine or apparatus unless such known process results in a new product or employs at least one new reactant.
![Page 49: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Explanation:-
For the purposes of this clause, salts, esters, ethers, poly-morphs, metabolites, pure form, particle size, isomers, mixtures of isomers, complexes, combinations and other derivatives of known substance shall be considered to be the same substance, unless they differ significantly in properties with regard to efficacy.
![Page 50: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(e) a substance obtained by a mere admixture resulting only in the aggregation of the properties of the components thereof or a process for producing such substance.Ex. Oral Rehydrating Solution containing Glucose, Sodium chloride, sodium bicarbonate, and potassium chloride.
![Page 51: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?(f) The mere
arrangement or re-arrangement or duplication of known devices each functioning independently of one another in a known way;
![Page 52: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(h) a method of agriculture or horticulture.
(i) any process for the medicinal, surgical, curative, prophylactic [diagnostic, therapeutic] or other treatment of human beings or any process for a similar treatment of animals to render them free of disease or to increase their economic value or that of their products;
![Page 53: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(j) plants and animals in whole or any part thereof other than micro organisms but including seeds, varieties and species and essentially biological processes for production or propagation of plants and animals;
![Page 54: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(k) a mathematical or business method or a computer program per se or algorithms;
![Page 55: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
(l) a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work or any other aesthetic creation whatsoever including cinematographic works and television productions;
21
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
![Page 56: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(m) a mere scheme or rule or method of performing mental act or method of playing game;
![Page 57: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(n) a presentation of information;
(o) topography of integrated circuits;
23
![Page 58: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Sec.3:- What are not inventions?
(p) an invention which, in effect, is traditional knowledge of which is an aggregation or duplication of known properties of additionally known component or components.
![Page 59: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Patent Prosecution
May 3, 2023
59
Patent application filing
Publication
18 months
Request for Examination(Express Examination Possible)
within 48 months from the date of priority
Issue of Examination Report
within 6 months from the request
Request for Early Publication any time before 18 months
Pre Grant Opposition
![Page 60: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Patent Prosecution (contd.)
60
Reply to Examination Report
Grant
Post Grant Opposition
within 12 months from the date of grant of patent
Renewals
compliance within 12 months from the date of issue of examination report
![Page 61: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Opposition Procedure Pre Grant Opposition Under Section 25(1)
Post Grant Opposition Under Section 25(2) Revocation before IPAB
Counter claim of invalidity in any Infringement case
May 3, 2023 61
![Page 62: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Pre-Grant Opposition- Procedure
18 months publication
Opposition By way of Representation by Anyone
Request for Examination
Notice to Applicant
Applicant’s reply to the Notice
May 3, 2023
62
Within 6 months of the first publication or at anytime before grant
Considered only after the Applicant files for Request for Examination
Within three months from date of notice
![Page 63: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Pre-Grant Opposition- Procedure (Contd.)
Consideration of Applicant’s reply
Satisfactory Not Satisfactory
Grant Amendment Suggested
Hearing
Rejection
MCO 63
Within one month from the above submission
![Page 64: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Post Grant Opposition
Notification of Grant
Notice of Opposition
Constitution of Opposition Board
Reply statement and evidence by applicant
Reply by Opponent
Hearing64
Within 2 months from date of date of receipt of copy of written statement
Within 1 month from the date of receipt of copy of applicant’s reply statement
Within 12 months from date of notification
With written statements and evidence
![Page 65: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Drafting a Patent
• Provisional application• Final specification• 12months to file a final specification• Should be in the format specified by
the patent office
![Page 66: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
TITLE
BACKGROUND OF INVENTIONSUMMARY OF INVENTIONDETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
ExamplesCLAIMSFIGURESOTHER ATTACHMENTSABSTRACT
Best Mode / Preferred Embodiments
![Page 67: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Do’s and Dont’s of Drafting
• There is a main Claim and dependent claims
• Each claim should be a single sentence which can run into many lines.
• Widest claim as possible• Should not be laudatory• Should be clear and understandable
67
![Page 68: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Do’s and Dont’s of Patent drafting
• Figures are important• The Claims are the crux of the patent• Prior art convinces the examiner of
the non-obvious factor• Best mode is important• Title is the choice of the inventor• Patent office can redo it if it is not
relevant68
![Page 69: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Do’s and don’t’s of Patent drafting
• There are claim limits• Additional claim will have additional
fee• The title should not exceed 15 words• Claims can be amended within the
scope of the invention• Difference between ‘compirising’ and
‘consisting’ ?69
![Page 70: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Let us play the inventor
![Page 71: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
A Sample Claim
• I claim: 1. A disposable toothbrush comprising: a cap including an opening for receipt of a fingertip,a flat surface located on one side of said cap having bristles projecting therefrom for brushing of teeth, a layer of dehydrated toothpaste being located on said bristles, and at least one dental hygiene accessory located on a side of said cap opposite to said one side, said at least one dental hygiene accessory being located within a capsule slidably mounted on said cap.
• 2. A disposable toothbrush as claimed in claim 1, wherein said capsule surrounds said at least one dental hygiene accessory.
3. A disposable toothbrush as claimed in claim 1, wherein said cap is biodegradable.
![Page 72: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
![Page 73: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Patent Cooperation Treaty• The Patent Cooperation Treaty is an agreement for
international cooperation in the field of patents.
• It is a treaty for rationalization and cooperation with regard to the filing, searching and examination of patent applications and the dissemination of the technical information contained therein.
• The PCT does not provide for the grant of “international patents”: the task of and responsibility for granting patents
• remains exclusively in the hands of the patent Offices of, or acting for, the countries where protection is sought (the “designated Offices”).
![Page 74: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
pct• The Patent Cooperation Treaty or “PCT”
entered into force• n 24 January 1978, and became operational
on 01 June 1978, with an initial 18 Contracting States.
• Presently more than 130 Contracting States had adhered to the PCT.
• Came into force for India on• 07 December, 1998.
• Filing and not granting.
![Page 75: Law of Patents](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081517/577ccf0e1a28ab9e788ec54a/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
THANK YOU• ANY QUESTIONS?
• VISIT –www.nalsarpro.org for our courses on Patents Law/Cyber laws – at centres of Pune/Mumbai/Delhi/Bangalore/Hyderabad/Ahmedabad and Chennai
• ACKNOWLEDGMENT• NALSAR PRO MATERIALS• MURALIDHARAN- VISITING FACULTY -NALSARPRO• ANINDYA SIRCAR- VISITING FACULTY-NALSARPRO• PVS GIRIDHAR- VISITING FACULTY-NALSARPRO• SWAPNA SUNDAR –VISITING FACULTY-NALSARPRO• NET RESOURCES