lcip2009-2013 italy chapter - 2-2 released issue · pdf filelcip2009-2013 italy chapter - 2-2...

LCIP2009-2013 Italy Chapter - 2-2 Released issue

Engineering & Tech. Staff Y Y Y 2006

Access ANSPs accounts Y N ITAF. ENAC supervises military activities in accordance with a special agreement signed by MOT and MOD

Y 2006

Economic oversight Y N ITAF. ENAC supervises military activities in accordance with a special agreement signed by MOT and MOD

Y 2006

Interoperability Y Y Y 2006

Changes since previous AR:

None

Additional

information: According to Italian Air Navigation code, ENAC is the sole Italian Authority in charge of Regulation and Oversight in every sector of Civil Aviation. Therefore ENAC is also the NSA for any SES regulation. Any variation to this situation will be notified to the Commission.

2.2 ANSP Certification, Designation & Cross-Border ANS Provision

2.2.1 Certification All certified ANSPs in Italy are presented below

Services for which it has been Certified Name of the ANSP ATS AFIS AIS CNS MET

Date of Certif.

Valid until Derogation Granted

Conditions Attached

ENAV S.p.A Y Y Y Y Y 20/06/07 20/06/09 N N

AVDA N Y N N N 21/06/07 20/06/09 N Y

Aeroporto Reggio Emilia s.r.l

N Y N N N 19/09/07 19/09/09 Y Y

SACE SpA N Y Y Y Y 25/03/08 24/03/10 Y Y

Aeroporto Lucca N Y N Y Y 15/10/08 14/10/10 Y Y

Name of the ANSP Type of Derogations granted

ENAV SpA None

AVDA None

Aeroporto Reggio Emilia s.r.l.

For ATSP, AISP, METSP and CNSP, in which area(s) derogations have been granted: - Annex I, Part 2 – Organisation’s structure and management - Annex I, Parts 3.2 - Annex I, Part 4 – Security (partial) - Annex I, Part 6 – Financial Strength - Annex I, Part 9 – Reporting Requirements

For AFIS providers indicate whether derogations have been granted on: - Safety management responsibility and external services and supplies (part 3.1.2) - Safety surveys (part 3.1.3) - Safety requirements for risk assessment and mitigation regarding changes (part 3.2)

Società Aeroporto Cerrione (Biella)

For ATSP, AISP, METSP and CNSP, in which area(s) derogations have been granted: - Annex I, Part 2 – Organisation’s structure and management - Annex I, Parts 3.2 - Annex I, Part 4 – Security (partial) - Annex I, Part 6 – Financial Strength - Annex I, Part 9 – Reporting Requirements


Aeroporto Lucca Tassignano SpA

For ATSP, AISP, METSP and CNSP, in which area(s) derogations have been granted: - Annex I, Part 2 – Organisation’s structure and management


- Annex I, Parts 3.2 - Annex I, Part 4 – Security (partial) - Annex I, Part 6 – Financial Strength - Annex I, Part 9 – Reporting Requirements



Added the following ANSPs: Aeroporto di reggio Emilia srl; SACE SpA; Aeroporto di Lucca Tassignano SpA

2.2.1.1 Derogation of EC Regulation 550/2004, article 7, paragraph 5

The Italian Air Force is authorised to provide ATS, CNS and MET Services to General Air Traffic (GAT) without certification. The Italian Air Force has adapted its organisational structure in order to generate functional separation between the high level body (USAM) accountable for services’ internal supervision and the units responsible for the provision of Air Navigation Services (Major Commands). Internal supervision activities and provision of Air Navigation Services to GAT are ensured by Italian Air Force in compliance with European Community laws and national regulation promulgated by the National Supervisory Authority, Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC). As required by Italian law, ENAC carries on its supervision on air navigation services provided by Italian Air Force to GAT in accordance with a special agreement signed by the two organizations.

2.2.2 Designation The status of designation of ATS and MET Providers in Italy is presented below:

State authority responsible for Designation Air Navigation Services (ANS) are provided by ITAF or ENAV S.p.A. within the Air Space respectively assigned by National Law (DPR 484/81). In 2006 the new Code of Air Law confirmed ENAV position in article 691bis. This designation has been brought in full compliance with SES regulation by the ANSP Certificate. At the same time, in 2006, some AFIS Provider operating under ENAV SpA supervision applied for a separate certificate. These ANSPs are going to obtain a formal certificate of designation within 2009.

Type of Service

Name of the Service Provider / Airspace under its responsibility

Date of Desig.

Valid until Conditions attached

ATS ENAV S.p.A / See Chapter 6 1981 unlimited Y

ATS Italian Air Force/ See Chapter 6 1981 unlimited N

ATS AVDA /AFIS for Aosta Airport Before 2004

31/12/2009 N

ATS Aeroporto Reggio Emilia/AFIS for Reggio Emilia Airport Before 2004

31/12/2009 N

ATS SACE SpA/AFIS for Biella Cerrione Airport Before 2004

31/12/2009 N

ATS Aeroporto Lucca/AFIS for Lucca Airport Before 2004

31/12/2009 N

ATS SOGEARTO/AFIS for Tortoli’ Arbatax Airport Before 2004

31/12/2009 N

ATS Aeroporto di Siena /AFIS for Siena Ampugnano Airport Before 2004

31/12/2009 N

MET ENAV S.p.A 1981 unlimited Y

MET Italian Air Force 1981 unlimited Y

The State/ANSP received an offer of services from N


another certified ANSP having its principal place of operation in another Member State:


None

2.2.3 Arrangements for Cross-Border ANS provision The following two tables present the cross-border provision of Air Navigation Services involving Italy, both for ATS and, separately for other ANS as foreseen in particular by the Service Provision Regulation in Preamble (13).

2.2.3.1 Cross-Border provision of ATS

ATS Services provided TO:

Area(s) Agreement with the State concerned on the supervision of the ATSP(s):

Beograd ACC Airspace surrounding CRAYE point

N ATS delegated to Brindisi ACC

Zagreb ATCC Airspace surrounding CRAYE point

N ATS delegated to Brindisi ACC

Vienna ACC Airspace south of Rocky Line and Solni Line

N ATS delegated to Padova ACC

Lubiana ACC Airspace west of the Line of Responsibility between Lubiana ACC and Padova ACC

N ATS delegated to Padova ACC

Marseille ACC FI-01/R and FI-02/R areas

N ATS delegated to Roma ACC

Switzerland (Skyguide)

Lugano CTR Y The agreement allows the air traffic management to and from Lugano airport Add ACC LoAs

ATS Services provided FROM:

Area(s) Agreement with the State concerned on the supervision of the ATSP(s):

Vienna ACC Airspace north and north-east of Rocky and Solni Line

N ATS delegated from Padova ACC

Lubiana ACC Airspace east of Line of Responsibility between Lubiana ACC and Padova ACC

N ATS delegated from Padova ACC

Marseille ACC IF-01/R, IF-02/R, IF-03/R, IF-04/R areas

N ATS delegated from Roma ACC

Malta ACC Airspace north of the Line of Responsibility of Malta ACC in Rome ACC FIR

N ATS delegated from Roma ACC



2.2.3.2 Cross-Border provision of other ANS

Cross-Border provision of other ANS than ATS N

2.3 Ongoing Compliance Name of the NSA: Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile – ENAC

The NSA has produced an Inspection Programme (as per Art. 7 of SP-IR-CR): Y

Further to the certification of the ANSPs, the NSA has verified compliance with the Common Requirements in the following areas since the last Annual Report:

Organisational Structure and Management Y All certified ANSPs

Safety Management System Y All certified ANSPs

Operation Manuals Y All certified ANSPs

Security Management System Y All certified ANSPs

Policies for Recruitment and Training of Personnel

Y All certified ANSPs

Financial Audits Y All certified ANSPs

Liability and Insurance Cover Y All certified ANSPs

Contingency Plans Y All certified ANSPs

Set up of a Quality Management System Y All certified ANSPs

Production of a Business Plan and an Annual Plan (including demonstration of economic and financial capacity):

Y ENAV SpA

Provision of an Annual Report: Y ENAV SpA

2.4 Consultation of stakeholders The State has implemented a formal consultation mechanism for the involvement of stakeholders in SES implementation:

Y

Since the last Annual Report, the following stakeholders have been consulted on the following topics:

ANSPs Y By correspondence and by ad-hoc groups/forums.

Regulation consultation and ATCOs Licensing

Airports Y By correspondence and by ad-hoc groups/forums.

Regulation consultation

Airspace Users Representative

Orgs.

Y By correspondence and by ad-hoc groups/forums.

26/07/07 meeting with charter operators 04/03/08 meeting with Airspace Users for Easter Traffic peak 19/03/08 meeting with Malpensa users about the modifications of traffic volumes 29/05/08 IATA meeting on 2009 Charges and Financial situation (ENAC and ENAV) 20/06/08 meeting with operators to prepare for the traffic peak of summer season 23/09/08 meeting with operators on summer season debriefing.

Professional staff representative

bodies

Y By correspondence and by ad-hoc groups/forums.

Social Forum on ATCO Licensing Implementation (3 meetings)

Manufacturing Y By correspondence and by ad-hoc Regulation consultation


industry groups/forums.

Military Y By correspondence and by ad-hoc groups/forums.

Regulation consultation and ATCOs Licensing

Other

2.5 ATCO Licensing Transposition of SP-D-ATCO Y In 2006 ENAC has published a regulation which

introduced the technical elements of the EU Directive. A law has been issued (Dlg 118/2008) to support ENAC Regulation for mutual recognition of licence and establishment of sanctions.

Communication to the EC of the national provisions enforced to comply with SP-D-ATCO

Y The communication of the promulgation of ENAC Regulation was done on March 2006. The communication of the promulgation of Dlgs 118/2008 was done by the Rappresentanza Permanente Italiana on 15 July 2008.

Certified ATCO training providers (as per Art. 10):

Y ENAV SpA Academy certification is almost finalised. ITAF ANS Training centre certification is almost finalised

Provisions of Art. 8 on ‘Linguistic Requirements’ implemented:

Y The minimum requirement requested for English and Italian is Level 4.

Aside from the two articles specified above, progress of implementation of SP-D-ATCO:

The transition towards the new ATCO licensing scheme (Dlg 118/2008) is in progress, it will be finalised within June 2009.


The issuance of the Dlg 118/2008

2.6 Airspace Full implementation of the Airspace Regulation in the State foreseen for:

2012 2012 is the start of the Implementation phase of Blue Med FAB Project, other requirements of the Law have been already fulfilled

Application of the airspace regulation to airspace under the responsibility of the State outside the ICAO EUR or AFI regions:

N/A

Current division flight level between upper and lower airspace: FL195

Intention to apply division flight level 285 N

The State has implemented airspace classification and access of flights operated under VFR above FL 195:

Y

The State has introduced additional rules with respect to access or operation of VFR flights above FL 195:

Y

Between FL 195 and FL 280 N There have been requests for TSA(s) (or equivalent) for GAT flying under VFR, as encompassed within the rules governing access for GAT VFR flights within this airspace: FL 285 and above N

Changes since

previous AR: Blue Med Project


2.7 FABs FAB initiative: BLUE MED project

Launched in: mid-2006

States involved: Italy, Greece, Cyprus and Malta Albania, Tunisia and Egypt are associate partners, and Republic of Jordan as observer

Feasibility: Start: Dec 06 End: Apr 08 Progress:

The Feasibility Study Phase (2006-2007), building on the findings of the preliminary study launched by ENAV and supported by MATS (MEDIFAB), addressed all the relevant issues related with the creation of FABs (Operational, Financial, Technological, Military, Environmental, Training, Human Resources, Legal,...).

Definition: Start: 2009 End: 2011 Progress:

This Phase will follow after the political engagement of the Partners States in pooling their airspace (or part of it) to build one or more FABs over the area. This phase will detail and plan all necessary actions, implementation and validation processes to be performed. In particular this phase will address the detailed design and validation of the new airspace structure, the definition and validation of the interoperability mechanisms, the identification of solutions for the legal-institutional and social issues identified in the previous phase and the execution of a full safety assessment. As final step, a Go/No Go decision based on the results of the Definition Phase will be taken, in order to verify the existence of all the prerequisite for the beginning of the implementation.

Implementation Phase

Start: 2012 End: 2015 Progress:

The Implementation Phase (2011/2012), is aimed at developing and implementing requirements and specific arrangements identified within the Definition Phase for Interoperability of ATM systems, also in accordance with SESAR indications. All necessary operational enablers (Airspace redesign training…) will be put in operation

There is a formal agreement between the States involved on the supervision of the ANSP(s) providing services in this FAB:

N

Agreement foreseen after the planned Definition Phase

There is an agreement in principle concerning the joint designation of the ATSPs within the FAB: N

Changes since previous Annual Report (AR):

None

Additional information:

2.8 Interoperability

2.8.1 NSA’s responsibilities

Name of the NSA: Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile – ENAC

The NSA has defined and allocated tasks and responsibilities in accordance with the IO-R:

Y

The NSA has developed Process Descriptions defining the supervision of compliance as defined in the IO-R:

Y

- Address the definition of systems subject to verification according to ANNEX I:

Y

- Specify the scope of the verification of the material provided by the ANSP:

Y

- Define how to proceed in case of conformity:

Y

- Define how to proceed in case of non-conformity:

Y

These:

- Define ‘templates’ (e.g. for the declaration): Y


2.8.2 Notified Bodies The table below shows the list of notified bodies appointed in Italy

Name Area of Responsibility Date of notification to the EC

ID number obtained from the EC

Have the ANSP(s) requested their services since the last AR?

None

2.8.3 Verification of Compliance This section covers the status of compliance of the State with regards to the IO-R and the associated Implementing Rules in place.

2.8.3.1 Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 on Interoperability

Number of EC Declarations of verifications of systems put into service after the 20th of October 2005 issued until 31.12.2008:

None

2.8.3.2 Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006 on Coordination and Transfer

Has the ANSP(s) implemented the processes related to notification and initial coordination between ACCs in compliance with this Regulation?

Y ENAV SpA

Has the ANSP(s) implemented any of the following processes between ATC units other than ACCs in compliance with this Regulation?

Notification Y Among the 4 ACCs and the airports of Torino, Genova, Venezia, Firenze, Napoli, Palermo, Olbia.

Initial Coordination Y 4 ACCs

Revision of Coordination Y 4 ACCs

Abrogation of Coordination Y 4 ACCs

Basic Flight Data Y Among the 4 ACCs and the airports of Torino, Genova, Venezia, Firenze, Napoli, Palermo, Olbia.

Change to Basic Flight Data Y Among the 4 ACCs and the airports of Torino, Genova, Venezia, Firenze, Napoli, Palermo, Olbia.

Has the ANSP(s) implemented any of the following optional processes in compliance with this Regulation?

Pre-Departure notification and coordination

Y Among the 4 ACCs and the airports of Torino, Genova, Venezia, Firenze, Napoli, Palermo, Olbia.

Change of frequency N This tool is already in the SW but it hasn’t been implemented yet.

Manual assumption of COM processes

N

Has the ANSP(s) implemented the civil-military flight data processes between their systems and these of controlling military units?

Y ENAV SpA

Has the ANSP used the “EUROCONTROL Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI)” as means to achieve compliance with the Regulation?

Y ENAV SpA

Has the ANSP used the “EUROCONTROL Specification for ATS Data Exchange Presentation (ADEXP)” as means to achieve compliance with the Regulation?

Y The FDP is able to read ADEXP messages but it is not able to show the messages to the Air Traffic Controllers

2.8.3.3 Regulation (EC) No 633/2007 on flight message transfer protocol

Has the ANSP(s) implemented the flight message transfer protocol in compliance with this Regulation?

N Not yet, the full implementation by ENAV SpA is forseen by the end of 2010

Has the ANSP used the “EUROCONTROL Specification for Y


the Flight Message Transfer Protocol” as means to achieve compliance with the Regulation?

2.8.3.4 Regulation (EC) No 1033/2006 on procedures for flight plans in pre-flight phase

Has the NSA verified the compliance of the ANSP(s) with this Regulation? N

Has the State taken any measures to ensure the compliance of the Operators with this Regulation?

Y The relevant part of this regulation has been introduced in the Italian “Rules of the Air”, therefore it is applicable to all Operators within the Italian Air Space

Has the State taken any measures to ensure the compliance of the IFPS with this Regulation?

Y Same as above

Has the ANSP used the “EUROCONTROL Specification for the Initial Flight Plan” as means to achieve compliance with the Regulation?

Y ENAV SpA

Has the ANSP used the “EUROCONTROL Specification for ATS Data Exchange Presentation (ADEXP)” as means to achieve compliance with the Regulation?

Y ENAV SpA

2.8.3.5 Regulation (EC) No 1265/2007 on air-ground voice channel spacing

Is the ANSP(s) in compliance with this Regulation? Y ENAV SpA

Has the State communicated to the EC any exceptional circumstances preventing ANSPs to comply with Art. 3.3?

N

Has the State communicated to the EC the lists of State aircraft that will not be equipped with 8.33 kHz radios, in order to benefit from the transitional arrangements?

Y

Has the State taken any measures to ensure the compliance of the Operators with this Regulation?

Y 8.33 kHz channel spacing has been introduced above FL 285 in 1997. On 31 March 2007 the level has been brought to FL 195. In both occasions Italian Operators have been over sought by ENAC surveyors in the framework of Air Operator Certificate. Private Aircraft are periodically checked for presence of the correct equipment Currently the check for presence of 8.33 Channel Spacing COM is an item of SAFA inspections. Non conformities have been identified in the past for non European aircraft, but presently they are close to zero.

Has the State ascertained non-compliances with this regulation leading to corrective measures?

N


2.9 Air Navigation Charging

2.9.1 Charging zones

2.9.1.1 En-route Charging Zone(s)

En-route Charging Zone(s) Nr Description

Italy 1 Milano Upper Flight Information Region Italian Republic Milano Flight Information Region Roma Upper Flight Information Region Roma Flight Information Region Brindisi Upper Flight Information Region Brindisi Flight Information Region

2.9.1.2 Terminal Charging Zone(s)

Terminal Charging Zone(s) Nr Description

Italy 1 Covering 46 airports LIRF, LIML, LIMC, LIRN, LIPZ, LIPE, LIMF, LICC, LICJ, LIEE, LIPN, LIME, LIEO, LIRQ, LIBD, LIMJ, LIEA, LICA, LIPQ, LICR, LIPY, LIBP, LICD, LICG, LIBC, LIPK, LIMP, LIRZ, LIMZ, LIRU, LIPB, LIMG, LIBG, LIPU, LIPV, LIBF, LIRI, LIQN, LIMA, LIPO, LIPX,LIRA, LIRP, LIBR, LIPR, LIPH, LICT

Decision by the State to: Additional Information Notified to

the EC Date of correspondence

Defer the application of Articles 9 and 11 to15 for terminal

Y Until 1 January 2010 Y 21 Dec 2006

Exempt ANS provided at Airports with less than 50.000

Commercial Movements per year from the application of the

Regulation

Y N/A Y 27 Nov 2008

Y 27 Nov 2008 Exempt ANS provided at Airports with less than 150.000

Commercial Movements per year from the application of Art. 11

and 13 of the Regulation

N N/A

Publication of final

assessment

N/A


2.9.2 Appeal/Review Procedure

Description of the review / appeal procedure for the decisions taken pursuant to the Charging Regulation

The appeal procedure may be pursued in the framework of general Italian administrative law, which establish the general rule for the appeal procedure towards any act of Italian State Administration. The appeal may be directed first to ENAC or Ministry of Transport, and then the litigation may be escalated to the Italian Regional Administrative Court and to the State Council which takes the ultimate decision.

2.9.3 Enforcement measures for the collection of air navigation charges

Enforcement measures applied for the collection of air navigation charges Y

The enforcement measures have been taken pursuant the article 802 of the Air Navigation Code which allows even to forbid the departure of aircraft operated by operators which do not pay the service charges.

lcip2009-2013 italy chapter - 2-2 released issue · pdf filelcip2009-2013 italy chapter - 2-2...

Documents