ld4 sec day2 final 11-03-09

Upload: antonio-hernandez

Post on 30-May-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    1/72

    1

    Welcome

    Day 2

    Thursday, November 5, 2009

    Tier I Data Sources / Problem ID

    Sec

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    2/72

    2

    WelcomeSchool Based Leadership Team

    Local District 4 Cohort I Schools

    Bancroft MS

    Burbank MS

    Irving MS

    Le Conte MS

    Virgil MS

    Eagle Rock HS

    Franklin HS

    Alexandria ES Lockwood ES

    Cahuenga ES Melrose ES

    Carthay Center ES Plasencia ES

    Del Olmo ES Politi ES

    Dorris Place ES San Pascual ES

    Esperanza ES Selma ES

    Gardner ES Union ESGarvanza ES Vine Street ES

    Gratts ES White ES

    Kingsley ES

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    3/72

    3

    Agenda

    Day Two Small Group Planning and Problem

    Solving

    Problem Identification Tier 1 Data Sources

    Problem Solving Process

    Step 1: Problem Identification

    Instruction

    Wrap-up/Next Steps

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    4/72

    4

    Perceptions of Skills Survey

    Your project ID is:

    Your 4-digit school location code

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    5/72

    5

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    6/72

    6

    Small Group Planning

    What does a small group planningsession look like?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    7/72

    7

    Break into Level-Alike Groups.

    Elementary stays in Royal Crest

    Secondary moves to Garden Room

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    8/72

    8

    Three-Tiered Model of School Supports &the Problem-solving ProcessACADEMIC SYSTEMS

    Tier 3: IntensiveInterventions Individualand very small groups of

    students who needintensive individualizedinterventions. Mostfrequent assessment andnarrowest focus ofcurriculumunlessalternate core protocol isused.

    Tier 2:Strategic/SupplementalInterventionsSmallgroups of students whoneed more support inaddition to the corecurriculum. More frequentassessment, narrowerrange of curriculum andmore minutes than Tier 1.

    Tier 1: Core CurriculumAll students, includingstudents who requirecurricular enhancementsfor acceleration. Leastfrequent data collection.

    Broadest curriculumcoverage. Fewest numberof minutes of instruction.

    BEHAVIOR SYSTEMSTier 3: IntensiveInterventionsIndividual

    and very small groups ofstudents who needintensive individualizedintervention. Mostfrequent assessment andmost focused curriculum.

    Tier 2:Strategic/SupplementalInterventionsSmallgroups of students whoneed more support inaddition to school-wide

    positive behavior program.More frequent datacollection, more focused

    curriculum and moreminutes than core.

    Tier 1 Core CurriculumAll students in all settings.Least Frequent datacollection. Broadestcurriculum coverage withfewest number of minutes

    exposure.

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    9/72

    9

    Problem ID

    In order to identify a problem, youvegot to start with three pieces of data-

    Benchmark level of performance

    Student level of performance

    Peer level of performance

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    10/72

    10

    Problem ID

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Student

    Benchmark

    Peers

    What kind of problemIs this ? A kid problemor a universal problem?

    What kind of problemIs this ? A kid problemor a universal problem?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    11/72

    11

    Problem ID

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Student

    Benchmark

    Peers

    What kind of problemIs this ? A kid problemor a universal problem?

    What kind of problemIs this ? A kid problemor a universal problem?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    12/72

    12

    Problem ID

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Student

    Benchmark

    Peers

    What kind of problemIs this ? A kid problemor a universal problem?

    What kind of problemIs this ? A kid problemor a universal problem?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    13/72

    13

    Progress Monitoring &Data Systems

    District database administered by the Los AngelesUnified School District

    Capacity to store data for five big ideas of reading

    Potential Tools: MyData, CoreK12, SOAR, DSS

    Potential measures DIBELS SOAR (K-5/6)

    CORE (K-8) SRI (Secondary)

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    14/72

    14

    LAUSD Data Systems

    Data reports available for Individual students

    Intervention groups (coming soon) Grade-levels

    Classrooms

    Schools District

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    15/72

    15

    The Big Tier I Question

    How effective is the core curriculum

    and instruction for all students?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    16/72

    16

    Unit 3, Reading Fluency

    H

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    17/72

    17

    Unit 3, Reading Fluency

    H

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    18/72

    18H

    Multiple Measures

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    19/72

    19

    Tier I Question

    How effective is the core curriculum forsubgroups of students?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    20/72

    20H

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    21/72

    21H

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    22/72

    22H

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    23/72

    23

    Tier I Question

    Which classrooms may require Tier I

    instruction and intervention?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    24/72

    24

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    25/72

    25

    The Health of Tier 1

    H

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    26/72

    26

    Student 1 Intensive 161

    Student 2 Intensive 335

    Student 3 Strategic 448

    Student 4 Strategic 479

    Student 5 Strategic 505

    Student 6 Strategic 511

    Student 7 Strategic 568

    Student 8 Strategic 584

    Student 9 Strategic 590

    Student 10 Strategic 595

    Student 11 Strategic 650

    Student 12 Strategic 652

    Student 13 Strategic 717

    Student 14 Strategic 736

    Student 15 Strategic 742

    Student 16 Strategic 756

    Student 17 Strategic 770

    Student 18 Benchmar

    k

    826

    Student 19 Benchmar

    k

    886

    Student 20 Benchmar

    k

    948

    Student 21 Benchmar

    k

    955

    Student 22 Benchmar

    k

    984

    Student 23 Benchmar

    k

    989

    Student 24 Benchmar

    k

    1133

    Scholastic Reading

    Inventory (SRI)

    Which students may require

    additional instruction and/or

    intervention?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    27/72

    27

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    28/72

    28

    www.swis.org

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    29/72

    29

    www.swis.org

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    30/72

    30

    www.swis.org

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    31/72

    31

    www.swis.org

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    32/72

    32

    www.swis.org

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    33/72

    33

    www.swis.org

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    34/72

    34

    www.swis.org

    Tier 1, 2, or 3 problem?

    A week before Winter Recess, a studentgets a referral for disrespect at 10:15in his science class.

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    35/72

    35

    www.swis.org

    Tier 1, 2, or 3 problem?

    A student is found to have a weapon inthe locker room at 2:45 p.m. on June2nd.

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    36/72

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    37/72

    37

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    38/72

    38

    Exercise

    Review data for your school

    Complete the worksheet

    Identify any Tier 1 weaknesses

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    39/72

    39

    Discussion

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    40/72

    40

    Problem-Solving and

    Response to Intervention:Skill Training Module

    Problem Identification

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    41/72

    41

    Problem Solving: Levels ofImplementation

    Can be applied to the student, classroom, building, district,and system problem levels

    Student- academic and/or behavior problem

    Classroom-discipline, returning homework Grade Level-low academic skill performance

    Building- bullying, attendance

    District- over-/under-representation

    System-problem common to students in building

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    42/72

    42

    How Does it Fit Together?

    Addl.Diagnostic

    Assessment

    InstructionResults

    Monitoring

    IndividualDiagnostic

    IndividualizedIntensive

    As necessary

    All Students ata grade level

    ODRsMonthly

    BxScreening

    Bench-Mark

    Assessment

    AnnualTesting

    BehaviorAcademics

    None ContinueWithCore

    Instruction

    GradesClassroom

    AssessmentsYearly Assessments

    GroupDiagnostic

    SmallGroupDifferen-tiatedBy Skill

    Approximatelymonthly

    Step 1Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

    Supplemental

    1-5%

    5-10%

    80-90%

    Core

    Intensive

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    43/72

    43

    Response toInstruction/InterventionIs it working?

    Problem AnalysisProblem AnalysisWhy is it occurring?

    Problem IdentificationProblem IdentificationWhat is the problem?

    Intervention DesignWhat are we going to do

    about it?

    Problem Solving Process

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    44/72

    44

    Steps in the Problem-SolvingProcess

    1. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

    Identify replacement behavior

    Data- current level of performance

    Data- benchmark level(s)

    Data- peer performance

    Data- GAP analysis

    2. PROBLEM ANALYSIS

    Develop hypotheses( brainstorming)

    Develop predictions/assessment

    3. INTERVENTION DESIGN

    Develop interventions in those areas for which data areavailable and hypotheses verified

    Proximal/Distal

    Implementation support

    4. RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtI2)

    Frequently collected data

    Type of Response- good, questionable, poor

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    45/72

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    46/72

    46

    REPLACEMENT BEHAVIORS

    Robert is reading below grade level Robert needs to improve his reading fluency rate

    from 42 wcpm to 75 wcpm.

    Sally is aggressive to her peers When provoked, Sally will use appropriate

    words, walk away or ask for help

    Rafael is disrespectful to adults Rafael will improve compliance to directions

    Rafael will respond to teacher questions orstatements with positive words (define)

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    47/72

    47

    REPLACEMENT BEHAVIORS

    State what you WANT the student tobe able to do.

    Behavior should reflect competenciesto improve adaptation

    Behavior should attract reinforcement

    Behavior must be measurable,observable or reportable

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    48/72

    48

    Data Required for ProblemIdentification

    Replacement Behavior

    Current Level of Functioning

    Benchmark/Desired Level

    Peer Performance

    GAP Analysis

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    49/72

    49

    Example- Oral Reading Fluency(ORF DIBELS) Current Level of Performance:

    40 WCPM

    Benchmark 92 WCPM

    Peer Performance 98 WCPM

    GAP Analysis: Benchmark/Target Student 92/40= 2+X difference SIGNIFICANT

    GAP Benchmark/Peer 92/98=

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    50/72

    50

    Problem ID

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    51/72

    51

    Example- Behavior

    Current Level of Performance: Complies 35% of time

    Benchmark (set by teacher) 75%

    Peer Performance 40%

    GAP Analysis: Benchmark/Target Student 75/35= 2+X difference SIGNIFICANT GAP Benchmark/Peer 75/40= 1.9 X difference SIGNIFICANT GAP Peer/Target Student 40/35= 1.1X difference NO

    SIGNIFICANT GAP

    Is behavior program effective? No, peers have significant gap frombenchmark as well.

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    52/72

    52

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    6070

    80

    90

    100

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Problem ID

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    53/72

    53

    10

    30

    38

    3031

    24

    30

    54

    26

    18

    86

    1716 16

    26

    29

    32

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    August

    September

    October

    November

    December

    January

    February

    March

    April

    May

    Month

    NumberofO

    DRs

    2005-2006 2006-2007

    Tier One Behavior Example

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    54/72

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    55/72

    55

    Building-Level Behavior Data

    % Building %Referred

    Male 50% 80%

    White 72% 54%

    Hispanic 12% 20%

    African American 15% 24%

    Other 1% 2%

    Low SES 25% 50%

    Central Question: For which ofthese groups is the disciplineplan inequitable?

    Behavior Referral Analy

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    MaleFe

    male

    White

    Hispanic

    African

    Am Other

    LowSES

    Building

    Referred

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    56/72

    56

    Beliefs Survey

    Your project ID is:

    Your 4-digit school location code

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    57/72

    57

    Content Piece

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    58/72

    58

    Instructional Sequence

    Bridge: Access prior knowledge---students makeconnections based upon based knowledge personalexperience or prior learning

    Read to get the GIST Reread to choose significant moments and explain their

    significance StepBack: Reflect on choosing and explaining significant

    moments Reread again, WriteAbout, and engage in an inquiry-

    based discussion to learn more about the connectionsbetween experience and literacy.

    Reflect on learning about literacy and experience Reread again differently to analyze the authors writing byexamining features of the writers style and method tostructuring his or her essay.

    Reflect on learning about literacy and experience.

    Practices Important for ELs inPractices Important for ELs in

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    59/72

    59

    Practices Important for ELs inPractices Important for ELs in

    Academic ClassesAcademic Classes

    Modeling

    Bridging

    Contextualization Schema Building

    Metacognitive Development

    Text Re-PresentationAida Walqui

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    60/72

    60

    Access Methodologies

    Cooperative Learning

    Instructional conversations

    Academic vocabulary Strategic use of graphic organizers

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    61/72

    61

    Reteaching Window

    High School

    Middle School

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    62/72

    62

    Tools for Reteaching

    Instructional guides

    Ancilliary materials from anthologies

    Embed skills in texts that studentshave already read

    Other ideas?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    63/72

    63

    Checking the Health ofTier 1 Instruction

    80% students are proficient

    Proficient = 67%-80%

    Reports

    Detailed (at a glance---by standard)

    Aggregate (by question and standard)

    Student Individual Reports

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    64/72

    64

    Detailed Report

    Review colorsBlue---advanced (81%-100%)Green---proficient (67%-80%)Yellow---basic (50%-66%)

    Orange---below basic (36%-49%)Red---far below basic (0%-35%)

    Which standards seem to be areas ofstrength?

    Which standards seem to need instructionalsupport?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    65/72

    65

    Aggregate Report

    Scan the following standards R 1.5 andR 3.6(middle school)

    Scan R 1.1 (high school)

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    66/72

    66

    Aggregate Report---continued

    Write the number of thestandard on the top of thechart.

    Write the number of thequestion that addresses thatstandard.

    Write the percentage proficientnext to the question.

    What level of Bloomstaxonomy would this questionaddress? Knowledge Comprehension Application

    Synthesis Evaluation

    Question Percentage BloomsLevel

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    67/72

    67

    Aggregate Report---continued

    As a table group discuss the following questions. Be preparedto share out your groups thinking.

    What did you notice about how the standard was addressedeach time in the assessment.

    What are areas of strength? What are areas that needsupport?

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    68/72

    68

    Student Report

    Another tool---Review whatinformation this can give us (Day 3)

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    69/72

    69

    Ideas for Planning

    What are some strategies the teacher can do toaddress the areas of weaknesses in the Tier 1instruction?

    As a grade level As a department As an SLC (high), as a PLC (middle) By self

    Brainstorm ways strategies and ideas to address theTier 1 instruction. Chart these ideas and hang.

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    70/72

    70

    Take a Look at Your Own Data

    Do the same process with your ownschool data in ELA

    This is the first assessment Middle School---grade 8 (looking at last

    years 7th grade data)

    High School---grade 10 (looking at lastyears 9th grade data)

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    71/72

    71

    Training Evaluation

    No location code needed

  • 8/14/2019 Ld4 Sec Day2 Final 11-03-09

    72/72

    Resources

    Jack OConnell http://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/el/le/yr08ltr1114.asp MyData- http://mydata.lausd.net

    Differentiation www.differentiationcentral.com

    Behavior - http://disciplinepolicy.lausd.net

    http://www.pbis.org

    http://www.swis.org

    NCLB - http://www.ed.gov/nclb

    National Center on Response to Intervention - http://www.rti4success.org

    Florida Center for Reading Research - http://www.fcrr.org

    National Association of State Directors of Special Education - www.nasdse.org

    Tilly, D.W. (2002). Best practices in school psychology as a problem solvingenterprise. In A. Thomas and J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in SchoolPsychology-IV (pp. 21-36). Bethesda, MD., National Association of SchoolPsychologists.

    http://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/el/le/yr08ltr1114.asphttp://mydata.lausd.net/http://www.differentiationcentral.com/http://disciplinepolicy.lausd.net/http://www.rti4success.org/http://www.fcrr.org/http://www.nasdse.org/http://www.nasdse.org/http://www.fcrr.org/http://www.fcrr.org/http://www.rti4success.org/http://disciplinepolicy.lausd.net/http://disciplinepolicy.lausd.net/http://www.differentiationcentral.com/http://mydata.lausd.net/http://mydata.lausd.net/http://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/el/le/yr08ltr1114.asp