leadership and international climate change cooperation: from copenhagen to paris charles parker...
DESCRIPTION
Climate Change Leaders and FollowersTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris
Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala University
Centre for Natural Disaster Science (CNDS), Uppsala University
![Page 2: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Key Questions:• What is the role of leadership in the climate negotiations ?• Are there any leaders in the field of climate change and, if so, who are they? • What leadership visions do they espouse? • How do followers select climate leaders? • How will leadership impact the outcome in Paris?
![Page 4: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Leadership is “a relationship between leaders and followers” (Underdal,1994:181)
Change the pay-offs by rewarding cooperative behaviour or punishing non-cooperative behaviour
Change the fundamental preferences through consciousness-raising (supplying new knowledge, proposing new solutions etc.)
Lead by example, thereby removing uncertainty and proving that proposed solutions actually work
![Page 5: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Leadership recognition, main actors COP 14-20, 2008-2014 (percentages)
2008COP14
2009COP15
2010COP16
2011COP17
2012COP18
2013COP19
2014COP20
Diff.
2008-14
EU as leader 62 46 45 50 51 48 48 -14
China as leader 47 48 52 50 48 42 48 +1
G-77 as leader 27 22 19 33 24 25 22 -5
US as leader 27 53 50 42 39 42 52 +25
N=3175
![Page 6: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
EU as leader US as leader China as leader
2008 2014 2008 2014 2008 2014
Delegates 58 51 19 46 50 44
Non-delegates 66 45 32 57 44 51
All 62 48 27 52 47 48
![Page 7: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
(1) Providing structural leadership: ability to provide resources and inducements
(2) Providing ideational leadership: ability to provide new ideas and solutions for dealing with the climate change problem
(3) Directional leadership (leading by example): ability to demonstrate a credible domestic climate change policy
(4) Instrumental leadership: ability to act as a broker to bridge problems in the negotiations
(5) Promoting the common good: overall commitment to solving the climate change problem
(6) Self-interest: Promoting/defending own country’s interests
Leadership factors – what motivates followers to support a particular leader?
![Page 8: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Africa Asia Europe North
America
S&L
America
Oceania All
Structural leadership 5.53 5.29 5.12 5.26 5.48 5.35 5.29
Directional leadership 5.59 5.47 5.58 5.63 5.55 5.82 5.57
Ideational leadership 5.83 5.57 5.48 5.59 5.93 5.94 5.62
Instrumental leadership 5.52 5.14 5.76 5.63 5.77 6.07 5.56
Self-interest 4.62 4.64 3.86 4.54 4.49 4.48 4.37
Common good 6.25 6.07 6.23 6.13 6.21 6.29 6.15
Importance of factors for leadership recognition 2009-2011, by region (means)
Total number of respondents = 1579. The 95% confidence interval is 0.11--0.21
![Page 9: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
(1) No one clear-cut leader
(2) Fragmented leadership landscape
(3) Mismatch between supply and demand for leadership, for example, COP 15 in Copenhagen
(4) Promoting the common good is key for gaining recognition as climate change leader
(5) No single mode is sufficient if one is to be recognized as a leader
Main Findings
![Page 10: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Paris Agreement?
• Paris Agreement: Will be a blend of the leadership visions of China, the EU, and the US
• Emerging “hybrid” architecture
• Institutional Design is likely to be a blend of bottom-up and top-down elements that balances national flexibility and international accountability to achieve broad participation but meaningful ambition.
![Page 11: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Leadership and International Climate Change Cooperation: From Copenhagen to Paris Charles Parker & Christer Karlsson Department of Government, Uppsala](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1af27f8b9ab05997eca5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What’s Next?• COP 21: Paris (30 Nov-11 Dec. 2015).
Prep meeting (Oct.). Heads of state meeting (27 Sept.). World Bank (Oct.)
• Parties are communicating their “intended nationally determined contributions” to the new Paris agreement (68 submissions).
• Agree to text on new climate agreement by end of COP 21 meeting in Paris, France.
Hope: Incremental Progress, Not PerfectionFear: Too SlowReality: Paris is an important step, but not a final
destination