leadership development
TRANSCRIPT
Leadership Development
LEADERSHIP THEORIES 2FE017
Spring 2015
Yuliya Ponomareva
Leadership development
Increasing publicity since 1990
Increasing competition
Importance of strategy
- Changing work environment:
Knowledge-based tasks
Need for problem-solving skills
Global LeadershipMultinational, global corporations require skills of global leaders:- cross-cultural leadership>>>cultural
intelligence- Importance of relationships and networks- Attitude towards experience and learning
3
The rise of the leadership development research
- Leader development•&- Leadership development
Corporate spending on leadership development:
• Why so much?
• Capability gaps
Leadership failure incidents
• Lack of leadership skills • Lack of interpersonal skills
Organization capabilities
What happens when leadership improves?
• People stick around• People are happier• People are more productive
Employee branding
8
Evidence of leadership development effectiveness:
• No conclusive evidence of effectiveness of leadership development (Burgoyne et al., 2004)
• Romanticized view on leadership• Limited knowledge about assessment of
leadership
9
Initial theories in leadership development:
• Grounded with trait approach• Effective leaders possess a certain set of traits
10
11
Nature Nurture
Generic determinants of personality: novelty seeking behavior, neuroticism
• Can be acquired early in life
Heredity of leadership style: 58% -Transformational leadership48% - Transactional leadership
• The traits can be reworked
Overall 30% of leadership effectiveness is genetically predetermined
• Development of leadership can be planned or accidental
Common ground perspective
12
• Genes are switched on and off by the environment
• Genes vary according to the experience
DEVELOPMENT
Big 5 personality traits
• Extraversion +++• Agreeableness *• Conscientiousness ++• Neuroticism -• Openness to experience +
Transactional leadershipTransformational leadership
13
Traits associated with leadership
- Intelligence- Self-confidence- Determination or perseverance- Sociability- Integrity
(Bligh, 2011)
Critique of the trait approach to leadership
- Grounded within the assumption of in-born leadership characteristics
- Fails to consistently distinguish between leaders and non-leaders
- Doesn't take into consideration the situational effects
Long term focus on personality and traits
• Traditional leaders’ traits:
• Sensitivity,• Tyranny• Intelligence• Devotion• Charisma• Strength • Attractiveness• Masculinity(Offermann et al., 1994)
Traditional followers’ traits:
• Enthusiasm • Good citizenship• Conformity• Insubordination• Incompetence(Sy, 2010)
Implicit theories about leadership:
- Exclusion of women- Exclusion of followers
Need to redefine the development of leadership
Leadership development across life span:
18
Parental m
odelingSocial environment
Self-Development
3 components of successful leadership development
• Self-efficacy: locus of control• Awareness• Leadership skills
19
Organizational level
• Development of leaders and development of leadership.
• Formal training and leadership development
• Focus: Problem solving, decision making.
20
Appraoches to organizational leadership development
• Leadership competence• Leadership development strategy
Organization levelImportance of fit between employees and organization: LINKS with STRATEGY1. Hiring practices2. Development and improvement3. Utilization
22
Hiring practices
• Competence based recruitment:
- Job-based competences- Team-based competences- Firm-based competences (Fernandez-Araoz, et
al., 2009)
Developing “Whole” LeadersPlacement decisions: - Job placements - Job rotation
Training for cognitive skills- Self-directed learning- Action learning- Soft training: team building
Coaching for emotional skills- Executive coaching- Formal mentoring
24
Emphasis on Experience
Utilization & Assessment
- Performance measurement- Career management- Reward systems (Gold, Thorpe, Mumford,
2010)
Assessment tools
• Leadership Audit Questionnaire: vision, strategy, empowerment, motivation, etc.
• 360 Degrees Assessment and Feedback
26
Bosses
Third party
Self
Subordinates
Peers
Shortcomings in Leadership Assessment and Development
• Hard to institutionalize• High costs• Poor implementation• Long-term orientation- no feasible results in a short run
27
Conclusions
28
Leadership
Experiences
GenesLeadership
StyleTrainingAge