leadership development program group...
TRANSCRIPT
Leadership Development ProgramGroup ProjectGroup Project
Staff Involvement in Shared Governance
MembersMembersCathi Douglas Stefanie Light
Strategic Communications
Danny Miranda
Major Events
Andi SteinDanny MirandaPhysical Plant
Andi SteinDepartment of Communications
Vennita JacksonPresident’s Office
Susan LeavyThe Women’s Center
Marci PayneI f ti T h lInformation Technology
OutlineOutline
1 Charge1. Charge
2. Background
3. Findings
4. Implementation Recommendationsp
5. Conclusion
Team ChargeTeam Charge
• Examine staff involvement in university governance
• Identify best practices for shared governance
• Expand staff contributions and involvement inExpand staff contributions and involvement in shared governance
B k dBackground
Staff at CSUF ff ’Staff at CSUF• Union‐represented staff
Staff #’s
1087(Not represented on Senate)
• Confidential/Excluded 79
• Management Personnel Plan(N t t d S t )
131(Not represented on Senate)
• Student/Graduate assistants are excluded/
What is Shared Governance?What is Shared Governance?
• Group(s) of people having a share in the key decision‐making processes
• Certain constituencies typically holdingCertain constituencies typically holding responsibility for the decision‐making process
What is Staff Council?What is Staff Council?
• Advisory body of staff y y
• Promotes: – Staff contribution– Staff contribution
– Campuswide representation
Staff recognition– Staff recognition
– Sense of community
O i ti– Open communication
California StateUniversity
Selection Pool(IPEDS*)
722Campuses 722
315Staff Councils 3
Academic Senate Voting Rights:
15
Academic Senate Voting Rights:• CSU Long BeachNon‐Voting Representation:
CSU S Di
*Integrated Post Secondary Education Data System
• CSU San Diego
History of CSUF Staff CouncilHistory of CSUF Staff Council
• Staff council operated successfully throughout 1960s and 1970s
• Addressed topics:Addressed topics:• Dress code• Flexible work hoursS ff d
• Payroll deduction • Staff development
• Staff awards
• Disbanded in 1981 with the advent of collective bargainingbargaining
• WASC requested to meet with staff council in March 2010
Fi diFindings
Legal DecisionsLegal Decisions
• Higher Education Employer‐EmployeeHigher Education Employer Employee Relations Act (HEERA) ‐ 1979
• Public Employee Relations Board (PERB) 1998• Public Employee Relations Board (PERB) ‐ 1998– Achieve shared governance
P id CSU id li– Provide CSU guidelines
Typical Staff Council ActivitiesTypical Staff Council Activities
• Strategic planningStrategic planning
• Staff development
• Event organization/fundraising
• Budgetingg g
• Communication flow
Staff councils do not address issues related to collective bargaining agreements.
Benefits of a Staff CouncilBenefits of a Staff Council
f ff• Provide a voice for staff
• Include staff perspective about university affairs
• Promote a sense of community
• Enhance staff participation and interactionp p
• Create selection standard for staff participation in campuswide committeesp
Staff Council ChallengesStaff Council Challenges
• Union consultation
• Support for staff involvement
• Collaborative relationship with the
Academic SenateAcademic Senate
Other Opportunitiesfor Staff Involvement
• More staff representation on Academic Senate committeescommittees
• Fair method of selecting staff for representationrepresentation
• Adding staff as a constituency to Senate
Survey Results
Do you believe that CSUF staff members have an adequate voice in members have an adequate voice in
university decision‐making?
31% Yes
69%NoNo
“Priority is to faculty, then to students, then
lastly staff. Not much depends on what the
staff wants ”staff wants.
Comment, University Governance Survey Question #2
Do you support the d l f ff l?development of a staff council?
11% No
89% Yes
“Staff has a vested interest in the success of the
university and their voices should be heard.”
Comment, University Governance Survey Question #2
What issues should ff l b l d ?
Staff Communication
Staff Council be involved in?
Budget‐Related Issues
Professional training and development
Strategic Planning
Budget‐Related Issues
Policy Development
Campus‐Improvement Projects
E l H i
Social event/program planning
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Employee Housing
“Students, faculty, and management all have
‘voices.’ It is just as important for staff to have
the same opportunity. The Union voice isthe same opportunity. The Union voice is
important for the masses, however, we need
something more localized to deal with things
that may affect just CSUF.” a ay a ec jus CSUComment, University Governance Survey Question #2
Recommendations
RecommendationsRecommendations
Form a staff council at CSUFForm a staff council at CSUF• Model it after CSULB’s staff council
• Modify to fit CSUF needs• Modify to fit CSUF needs
• Consult union stewards, key administrative and academic leadersacademic leaders
• Provide sufficient resources
RecommendationsRecommendations
Ask the Academic Senate to consider
adding staff as a constituencyadding staff as a constituency• Provide voice
O t it f ti i ti• Opportunity for participation
RecommendationsRecommendations
Develop a formal process to appoint staff toDevelop a formal process to appoint staff to
campus committees
d di d i• No standardized process exists
ConclusionConclusion
• Strong support for shared governance
C t i t ld f ilit t• Current campus environment would facilitate successful incorporation of staff council
• Recommend creation of a staff council at CSUF
Q tiQuestions