leadership. student presentations dammein hurdle brian sheeran jacelyn lopez-bello willie douglas...
TRANSCRIPT
Leadership
Student Presentations
Dammein Hurdle Brian Sheeran Jacelyn Lopez-Bello Willie Douglas J.R. Gonzalez Dilcia Vasquez Abubakar Quartey
What is Leadership?
“There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept.”
Stodgill, 1981. p. 7
" ...leadership is like the Abominable Snowman,whose footprints are everywhere but who is nowhere to be seen“
Bennis & Nanus, 1997
What is Leadership?• Leadership is the “behavior of an individual …
directing the activities of a group towards a
shared goal.” Hemphill and Coons, 1957
“Leadership is about innovating and initiating …
Leadership is creative, adaptive, and agile …
Leadership looks at the horizon, not just at the
bottom line.” Bennis and Goldsmith, 1994, p. 4
What Is Leadership?
• Ability to get others to do what you want• Leaders motivate people to get things done• Leaders provide a vision• Leadership is facilitation
In their book, Reframing Organizations, Bolman and Deal say the answer seems to fall into the following categories:
Bolman, L.G., & Deal, T.E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Definition of Leadership
A passion for your goals An understanding of your medium Examples:
Microwave multiplexer designer Journalist Politician?
We are most interested in people leadership
Exercise - Changes in Leadership
In the first column of the worksheet at table, list the significant ways in which your business is changing. What is changing? What does the business have to do to cope?
Changing Environment Worksheet
What’s Changing Organization ResponseCustomers expect immediateresponse
Exercise - Changes in Leadership
In the second column, list the things your organization must do to cope with the change listed in the first column. How must the organization behave differently to meet the changes?
Changing Environment Worksheet
What’s Changing Organization ResponseCustomers expect immediateresponse
Must reduce cycle time forproduction of widgets
Exercise - Changes in Leadership
Form small groups Describe change and organization response Determine what leadership behaviours are required to lead
organization (last column)
Changing Environment Worksheet
What’s Changing Organization ResponseCustomers expect immediateresponse
Must reduce cycle time forproduction of widgets
Leadership Behaviours
As described by participants in LDP:
Visionary Trustworthy Charismatic Decisive Flexible Good Communicator Integrity Motivational
Effective Leadership Indicator
Overall adjectives might be perceived as falling into specific groupings. On the one hand, they can becommon, mixed or uncommon descriptors (defined by how many people are typically described that way).They can also be seen as making people more effective, less effective or being neutral. If we create a tablewith those rows and columns, here is the result.
Effect /Adjective
More Neutral Less
CommonFair *Resourceful *Determined *Dependable *Trusted *Understanding *Supportive *Adaptable *Appreciative *Self-confidentConsiderateAnalyticalOrganizedEnergetic
EncouragingInitiatingDecisiveIndependentMethodicalDelegatingPatientReflectiveDeliberateEasygoingConsentingCompromisingCasual
Mixed PermissiveForcefulDemandingChangeable
BluntOpinionatedCriticalConservativeGuardedConventional
Uncommon DogmaticPressuringManipulatingDetachedImpulsive
ImpersonalSelf-centeredAbrasiveImpatientNoncommittal
* -Critical Adjectives
Globe Project
Background Are transformational
characteristics of leadership universally endorsed?
170 country co-investigators 65 different cultures What traits are universally viewed
as impediments to leadership effectiveness?
Globe Database 17,500 middle managers 80% male 65 countries 800 organizations
Universal PositiveLeader Attributes
Trustworthy Honest Encouraging Positive Dynamic Motivator Dependable Intelligent
Decisive Communicative Informed Team builder Win-win problem solver Plans ahead Just
Universal NegativeLeader Attributes
Loner
Asocial
Irritable
Dictatorial
Ruthless
Non-cooperative
Egocentric
Culturally Contingent Items
Ambitious Cautious Cunning Domineering Elitist Enthusiastic Formal Independent Individualistic Intra-group competitor
Intra-group conflict avoider
Intuitive Logical Micro-manager Risk-taker Self-effacing Sensitive Sincere Worldly
Leadership Behaviours
Items generated by exercise not different from those people use to describe past leaders
Special emphasis on people and strategic relationships rather than technical abilities.
Are some areas usually described as changing
Leadership Behaviours
Level Five Leader - Jim Collins, Good to Great
Mix personal humility with professional will Seek sustained results -
Who is on the bus Hedgehog Concept Flywheel
Leadership Behaviours
Primary change appears to be response to information overload.
Information overload not new but rate of change has increased exponentially.
New leader must be able to successfully handle higher levels of information flow while making reasoned decisions.
Trait Theories: 1960s-1990s
ambition and energy desire to lead honesty and integrity self-confidence
intelligence high self-monitoring job-relevant
knowledge
Seven traits seemed to differentiate leaders from non-leaders (but with only modest predictive ability)
Researchers began organizing traits around the Big Five personality framework
Conscientiousness Agreeableness Emotional Stability Openness to experience Extraversion
Resulted in consistent support for traits as predictors of emerging leaders
BUT Assume innate, or inherent
skills Only moderate predictive
ability Gender-bias
Gender bias today?
Do you think stereotypes affect who we tend to see as a leader?
Gender Bias in Leadership Perception
Ann B. Hopkins was denied a partnership at Price Waterhouse (U.S., 1987)
Gender stereotyping played a role in this decision (Fiske et al., 1991).
Perceptions of Leadership(SIOP)
Traits often attached to effective leadership are "masculine" (e.g., courage, persuasiveness, and assertiveness)
An aggressive male leader will be viewed as ambitious, while an aggressive female leader may be viewed as pushy.
These perceptions are grounded in the gender stereotypes that have developed over time.
Behavioral Theories
A move from leaders to leadership Assumes people can be trained to
lead Researched the behaviors of specific
leaders Provides the basis of design for
training programs
Assessing leadership behaviors
Measures:
Campbell Leadership Index (CLI) Benchmarks Firo-B (covered in class already: Inclusion,
Control, Affection)
How used?
Campbell Leadership Index(Nilsen & Campbell, 1998)
Where do you stand on these? Leadership Energy Affability Dependability Resilience
CLI
Leadership orientation includes 8 subscales: Ambitious Daring Dynamic Enterprising Experienced Farsighted Original Persuasive
CLI
Energy orientation No subscales
Affability orientation Affectionate Considerate Empowering Entertaining Friendly
CLI
Dependability orientation Credible Organized Productive Thrifty
Resilience orientation Calm Flexible Optimistic Trusting
LE
AD
ER
SH
IP
Self-Observer Comparison for Chris Sample(8 Observers) Page 2
Self Observer Average
Leadership Energy Affability Dependability Resilience
Self 51 46 56 31 56 58 60 52 48 45 38 34 40 51 29 37 57 52 57 60 63 52 50 49 59 51 49
Observers 49 60 46 38 50 51 57 49 56 52 37 29 43 43 33 34 55 47 61 55 65 48 51 44 49 50 48
Survey Version: B
S T A N D A R D S C O R E
VeryHigh
High
Mid-Range
VeryLow
Low
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
© 1988, 1990, 1996, 1998 David Campbell, Ph.D. This form, and its contents, may not be duplicated in any manner without written permission from the publisher.Published by National Computer Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55440. The Campbell Leadership Index is one of the Campbell Development Surveys by David Campbell, Ph.D.
"CLI" is a registered trademark and "Campbell" is a trademark owned by David Campbell, Ph.D.
S
The Overall Index is based on the items scored across all of the scales.
Scores 60 or higher are considered very high.
Scores of 40 or below are considered very low.
Scores between 40 and 45 fall into the low range.
Scores between 45 and 55 are mid-range.
Self scores are plotted with black diamonds. Average observer scores are plotted with hollow circles.
Orientations and scale titles are printed here.
S
S
S
S
SS
S
S
S Scores between 55 and 60 fall into the high range.
S
EN
ER
GY
AF
FA
BIL
ITY
DE
PE
ND
AB
ILIT
Y
RE
SIL
IEN
CE
OV
ER
AL
L I
ND
EX
Am
bit
iou
s
Dari
ng
Dyn
am
ic
En
terp
risi
ng
Exp
eri
en
ced
Fars
igh
ted
Ori
gin
al
Pers
uasi
ve
Aff
ect
ion
ate
Con
sid
era
te
Em
pow
eri
ng
En
tert
ain
ing
Fri
en
dly
Cre
dib
le
Org
an
ized
Pro
du
ctiv
e
Th
rift
y
Calm
Fle
xib
le
Op
tim
isti
c
Tru
stin
g
Benchmarks(CCL, 2001)
16 Leadership skills/perspectives important for success Resourcefulness Doing whatever it takes Being a quick study Decisiveness Leading employees Confronting problem employees Participative management Change management
Benchmarks continued….
Building and mending relationships Compassion and sensitivity Straightforwardness and composure Balance between personal life and work Self-Awareness Putting people at ease Differences matter Career management
Benchmarks continued…
PLUS Problems that can stall a career:
Problems with Interpersonal Relationships Difficulty Building and Leading a Team Difficulty Changing or Adapting Failure to Meet Business Objectives Too Narrow a Functional Orientation
Importance For Success Average ScoresScale All Obsv Boss Self All Obsv Self
Re
sp
ec
tin
g S
elf
an
d O
the
rsM
ee
tin
g J
ob
C
ha
lle
ng
es
Le
ad
ing
Pe
op
le
Higher Ratings Preferred
SECTION 1: LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND PERSPECTIVES
Importance For Success And Average Scores
The center columns of the table summarize “Most Important for Success” information: how many All Observers (excluding Self) considered the scale to be one of the eight “Most Important for Success” in your organization, which scales were selected () by your immediate Boss, and which ones were selected () by you (Self).
The columns on the right show the average scores for all the questions (items) in the 16 scales. Your All Observer score includes everyone who completed a survey for you except yourself. The detailed item scores for each scale are shown on pages 8 through 32.
3
PAT S. NOTREAL
1. Resourcefulness 8 4.04 3.60
2. Doing Whatever It Takes 4 3.87 3.78
3. Being A Quick Study 4 3.65 2.75
4. Decisiveness 6 3.96 4.00
5. Leading Employees 8 3.93 3.29
6. Confronting Problem Employees 3 3.63 3.67
7. Participative Management 5 4.07 4.00
8. Change Management 6 3.94 3.78
9. Building And Mending Relationships 7 3.98 3.73
10. Compassion And Sensitivity 3 4.11 3.29
11. Straightforwardness And Composure 6 3.95 4.00
12. Balance Between Personal Life And Work 5 4.46 4.25
13. Self-Awareness 3 4.03 3.50
14. Putting People At Ease 5 4.60 4.00
15. Differences Matter 2 4.61 4.17
16. Career Management 3 3.82 2.89
Development
Look at situational demands and your current skill level and consider anxiety/performance relationship:
Under-challenged
Over-challenged
Developmental Balance
Relationship between current skills and situational demands
OVERCHALLENGED
Current SkillsSituational Demands
Relationship between current skills and situational demands
Current SkillsSituational Demands
DEVELOPMENTAL BALANCE
Ohio State Studies
Developed two categories of leadership behavior
Initiating structure – leader attempts to organize work, work relationships, and goals
Consideration – leader displays concern for followers’ comfort, well-being, status, and satisfaction
Ohio State Studies
Research findings: “High-High” leaders achieved higher
subordinate performance and satisfaction
BUT High on initiating behavior in routine tasks =
higher rates of absenteeism, grievances, turnover
Ohio State Studies
Lesson learned:
Need to consider the situational factors that influence leadership success and failure
Situational Leadership
What kind of leader does it take to lead… ….in a gang?
….in an emergency hospital room?
....in a family-run business?
…in a global organization?
Situational Leadership Model(Hersey, 1979, 2002)
Situational Leadership Model(Hersey, 1979, 2002)
LOW
HIGH
HIGHTASK BEHAVIOUR
RELA
TIO
NS
HIP
BEH
AV
IOU
R
P4 P1P2P3
S4 S1
S2S3
Coaching
Structuring
Encouraging
Delegating
S1 Leader • Structuring1. Tells what, when, where2. Shows how, demonstrates,
instructs3. States facts and procedures4. Follows up on tasks5. Takes charge6. One way communications
P1 Performance New to task Does not know how OR Low Motivation OR Unsatisfactory performance
if not shown how to do job High Insecurity
Task
Rela
tion
ship
H
L H
S2 Leader • Coaching1. Shares “why”2. Solicits ideas3. Persuades, influences4. High interaction, feedback
and participation5. Two way communications6. Time consuming
P2 Performance Performance has improved Motivated, willing, confident Still needs direction
Task
Rela
tion
ship
H
L H
S3 Leader • Encouraging1. Good listening2. Two way communications3. High support4. Emphasis on increasing
confidence and motivation5. Less emphasis on how task
is accomplished
P3 Performance Experienced Skilled Still needs encouragement,
recognition or confidence OR May be unwilling
Task
Rela
tion
ship
H
L H
S4 Leader • Delegating1. Gives little encouragement
or direction2. Informs that efforts are
recognized and appreciated3. Allocates appropriate resources4. Keeps a regular contact
P4 Performance Experienced Competent Willing Responsible Confident Autonomous Involved Provides own reinforcements
through results
Task
Rela
tion
ship
H
L H
Applying Situational Leadership Break-Out Groups
Analyze 4 Scenarios—Apply SL Model
For each scenario, come up with best strategy and figure out to which quadrant each strategy belongs
Student Presentations
Contingency Theories
Fiedler Leader-member exchange Path-goal Leader-participation
Fiedler Leadership Model
Effective group performance depends on the proper match between the leader’s style of interacting with subordinates and the degree to which the situation gives control and influence to the leader
Least-preferred co-worker (LPC)
questionnaire: Asses leadership style
Fiedler Model Continued…
Relationship-oriented: describe your least favorite coworker in favorable terms (high LPC score)
Task-oriented: describe your least favorite coworker in negative terms (low LPC score)
Leadership style is FIXED, per Fiedler
Fiedler Contingency Dimensions
Leader-member relations Task structure Position power
Fiedler Model
Fiedler Model continued…
Fiedler adjusted his own model
8 down to 3 situations: Task-oriented leaders do best in hi/low control Relationship leaders do best in moderate control
situations
Problem: LPC scores not reliable over time; logic not well understood!
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory Leaders do differentiate among followers
In-group choosing far from random (remember social identity theory?)
Followers with in-group status have: higher performance ratings lower turnover intentions greater satisfaction with their superiors higher overall satisfaction than those in the out-group
Path-Goal Theory(Robert House)
Leader’s job is to assist followers in attaining their goals provide the direction and support needed ensure that goals are compatible with the overall
objectives of the organization
Leaders behavior perceived as acceptable & motivational
Path-Goal Theory
Directive leader Supportive leader Participative leader Achievement-oriented leader
Path-Goal Theory
Leader-Participation Model(Vroom & Yetton)
Leader behavior must adjust to reflect the task structure
Sequential set of rules that should be followed in determining the form and amount of participation in decision making
Transactional leaders - - motivate their followers in the direction of established goals by clarifying role and task requirements
Transformational leaders - inspire followers to transcend their own self-interests for the good of the organization
Charismatic Leadership Theory
Followers make attributions of heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors
Charismatic Leaders
Have vision & can articulate that vision
Willing to take risks to achieve vision
Sensitive to both environmental constraints and follower needs
Exhibit behaviors that are out of the ordinary
How Charismatic Leaders Influence Followers
Articulate an appealing vision Communicate high performance expectations Convey, through words and actions, a new set of
values Make self-sacrifices and engage in unconventional
behavior to demonstrate convictions about the vision
Increasing body of research shows correlations between charismatic leadership and high performance and satisfaction among followers
Importance of non-cognitive aspects of intelligence Role of emotional intelligence in leadership
effectiveness
Ethical implications in leadership (last week’s class)
Need to modify leadership style to cultural differences
Emotional Intelligence (EI) 1937: Robert Thorndike writing about
social intelligence Recent studies indicate that EI is the best
predictorof who will emerge as a leader
Goleman, “What makes a Leader?”(Harvard Business Review, 1998) Leadership = IQ + technical ability + emotional
intelligence
EI competencies are NOT innate, but learned abilities
5 components of emotional intelligence Adapted from Saloveys work in 1990s
EI
1) Self-Awareness
Hallmarks are: Self-confidence Realistic self-assessment Self-deprecating sense of humor
EI
2) Self-Regulation
Hallmarks are: Trustworthiness and integrity Comfort with ambiguity Openness to change
EI
3) Motivation
Hallmarks are: Strong desire to achieve Optimism, even in face of failure Organizational commitment
EI
4) Empathy
Hallmarks are: Expertise in building and retaining talent Cross-cultural sensitivity Service to clients and customers Social awareness
EI 5) Social Skills
Hallmarks are: Effectiveness in leading change Persuasiveness Expertise in building and leading
teams Skilled at handling emotions in
others
EI Measures
EQ-I (Bar-On, 1997): self-assessment
Multifactor EI Scale (Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 1998): test of ability/perform a series of tasks related to emotion
Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI; Goleman, 1998): 360-degree instrument assessing EI competencies of person
Managing Diversity(SIOP)
Some researchers go as far as to distinguish between "hiring diversity" and managing diversity.
Managing diversity in organizations entails maintaining an atmosphere where people with different perspectives are allowed to speak and act freely.
Training can focus on the sources of this diversity (cultural, racial, gender, age-related, etc.) and why people who are different should not be viewed as deficient.
Leaders need followers!
Role of Followers: Accept the right of the person to lead Give Leader feedback and make contributions Provide information and be a resource Guard against stereotyping
Leaders and followers are interdependent
What are the advantages to being a follower?
Leaders need to build trust!
Build a sense of safety for everyone
What is Trust?
A positive expectation that another will not--through words, actions, or decisions--act opportunistically
We feel trust. Emotions associated with trust include companionship, friendship, love, agreement, relaxation, comfort.
Familiarity, Risk
Trust Dimensions
CompetenceCompetence ConsistencyConsistency
LoyaltyLoyalty OpennessOpenness
IntegrityIntegrity
Three Types of Trust
Deterrence-based = fear-based
Knowledge-based
Identification-based
How to Build Trust
Practice openness Be fair Speak your feelings Tell the truth Show consistency Fulfill your promises Maintain confidences Demonstrate competence
Think, Think, Think
Are all managers leaders? Are all leaders managers? Are all leaders experts? Are all experts leaders?