leadership1
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Leadership
Dr Laura Galloway
Why lead?
Leaders are needed to
Inspire, Provide direction, Get the best out of people For the best results
And lack of leadership?
Funny Teamwork - YouTube.flv
This is not leadership
And its not here either
Older Theories of Leadership
Trait theory leaders have special
characteristics or abilities, such as intelligence, energy and resourcefulness, which differentiate them from others (e.g. Barnard, 1938; Ghiselli, 1971; Stogdill, 1948).
Handy (1993) states that in excess of one hundred studies had investigated the validity of Trait Theory by 1950 and only five percent of these had identified similar or common traits.
History will be kind to me for I intend to write it
Winston Churchill
Older Theories of Leadership
Behavioural theories different styles of leadership, such as autocratic versus
democratic, or people-centered versus task-centered (e.g., Katz, et al., 1951; Stogdill and Coons, 1957).
the leader’s behaviour and style rather than his or her inherent personal traits determine success.
Behavioral approaches to leadership have provided inconsistent research results though situational factors do impact on the relationship
between leader behaviour and outcomes (Antonakis, et al., 2004).
Recent Leadership Theory
Situational or Contingency Theory
effective leaders act in a flexible manner and adopt an appropriate leadership style according to the requirements of a given situation (Fiedler 1967; House, 1971).
the Hersey-Blanchard (1969) situational leadership model suggests that successful leaders adjust their styles.
—the key issue in making these adjustments is follower maturity, based on
follower ability follower confidence.
The principles of this flow into modern leadership theories about HOW this is done
Transactional / Transformational Leadership Theory
the transactional leader gratifies the immediate needs and self-interests of followers via rewards and incentives, and includes penalties
the transformational leader focuses on building and developing follower motivation and morale
Burns (1978)
Transactional Leadership Theory
Bass (1998) identifies that the transactional relationship can take three forms.
1. the transactional leader provides clear guidelines for how followers will be rewarded, i.e. contingent reward behaviour (Bass, 1985).
2. the leader scrutinises follower performance and will take corrective action if they fail to meet the expected standard, i.e. management by exception behaviour.
3. the leader avoids taking any actions towards his or her followers, i.e. laissez-faire behaviour.
Transactional Leadership??
Thus:
transactional leadership is based on bureaucratic control and authority centres on task completion depends on rewarding and punishing followers
to extract effort (Tracey and Hinkin, 1998)
If you treat people right they will treat you right
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Transactional Leadership
The spirited horse, which will try to win the race of its own accord, will run even faster if encouraged
Ovid
Transformational Leadership
leader looks beyond immediate self-interest involves followers in a shared vision of the future for
mutual advantage.
Communicate vision passionately (Bass and Riggio, 2006)
Vision inspires faith in a happier, more successful future, produces personal commitment, the ideas of the leader are tangibly linked to those of the
followers (Bass, 1990; Shamir et al., 1993).
Often involving charisma on the part of the leaderSteve Jobs talks about managing people - YouTube.flv