learn with us. improve with us. influence with us | cwag general meeting hra business planning...
TRANSCRIPT
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
CWAG General MeetingHRA Business Planning EnvironmentBen Taylor31st January 2014
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 2
Agenda
• Business planning– Self-financing– Rents– Ring fence– Right to buy– New Build and debt cap
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
Business planning framework
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 4
LAs HRA under self-financing
• Let us not forget…• Self-financing made all authorities are better off
1. Increase in assumed major repairs allowance • Rise to £1.726bn = increase of £460m
2. Retaining rent income as rents increase• £300m+ underneath target rent which will be made up over time
3. Ability for many to borrow up to the borrowing cap but unevenly spread• Headroom total £2.87bn
4. For debt take-on authorities, a ‘cheap’ debt gain• 85bps on £13.5bn = £100-125m
• A small number struggling in short term – decent homes• A larger minority with medium term pressures• The vast majority with some borrowing and potential revenue to
invest
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
The start of the journey• A positive picture...
• Sensible prudent decision making to get the deal done
• Some LAs pushing ahead straight away with new build programmes
• Many taking time to review asset management in more detail
• Most have resources to invest
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 6
BP research: some headlines
One year in…• Council housing has responded
appropriately• Councils are making prudent
and sensible assumptions• The sector is investing wisely• Financing programmes is
primarily a ‘revenue’ undertaking
• New build an increasing priority
• Survey now being repeated – how will it have moved?
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
Rents
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 8
Legislation
s24 of the Housing Act 1985(1) A local housing authority may make such
reasonable charges as they may determine for the tenancy or occupation of their houses.
(2) The authority shall from time to time review rents and make such changes, either of rents generally or of particular rents, as circumstances may require.
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 9
Rent restructuring
• A central rent policy ‘Rent Restructuring’ introduced in April 2002• Prior to this a variety of approaches• In principle rents for the same property in the same area will be the same if
Council or Housing Provider• Voluntary(!)• Each property has a ‘formula’ or ‘target’ rent based on a formula• This formula rent increases by Inflation (RPI) plus 0.5%• Rents assumed to converge by April 2015 (built into the self-financing
settlement)• Actual rent not to increase by more than RPI plus 0.5% plus £2• “To cover ‘Bricks and Mortar’ only”• Service charges assumed ‘de-pooled’
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 10
How are rents ‘controlled’?
Voluntary but legislative andfiscal controls…
Subsidy system Rent Rebate Subsidy Limitation
It is for local councils to decide what rent to set
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 11
Under subsidy
• Rent collection assumed guideline less 2% void• Maximise subsidy position – charge rents at
guideline• Caps and limits adjustment (per property
control) Cap – maximum rent for property Limit – unable to charge at guideline due to RPI +
0.5% +£2 cap (constrained rent) Adjusts average guideline – built into settlement
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 12
Rent rebate subsidy limitation• RRSL introduced (1996) via a limit rent mechanism• Incentivise council’s to control cost and hence rents• If a Council’s average rent is higher than the limit
rent then the council (i.e. tenants) will have to fund a proportion of any rebates above the limit.
• The limit rent was set to converge with formula rent in April 2015
• RRSL does not apply in the Private Registered Provider sector – rent standard
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 13
How have rents moved?
2001.02 2002.03 2003.04 2004.05 2005.06 2006.07 2007.08 2008.09 2009.1 2010.11 2011.12 2012.13 2013.140.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
Formula rent Guideline Rent Limit rent Actual
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 14
Business planning as it was..
• Under rent convergence Declining rate of increase in the run up to convergence RPI+0.5%+’negligible’ Smoothing the path to convergence is not uncommon Increase locked into settlement
• Spending round announcement and subsequent consultation RPI + 0.5% to CPI + 1% from 2015/16 (for ten years) End of rent convergence
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 15
Impact of rent changes• CPI change moves rents in line with benefits/pension
uprating but link broken in short term• CPI forecast to be lower in the long run leading to lower
rent increases Hold cost base to CPI + 0.5% = no change to current
assumptions for many• Removal of convergence is a loss (significant in some
cases) of revenue to business plans Is it affordable? What needs to change?
• What happened to equity between social renters?• National rent policy incoherent – affordable rents v social
rents v benefit bill
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 16
What can be done?
• Time for a more fundamental review of rent setting approach? What could that look like?
• CIH tried to open the debate We need to talk about rents
• http://www.cih.org/resources/PDF/Policy%20free%20download%20pdfs/We%20need%20to%20talk%20about%20rents.pdf
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 17
What we still don’t know
• CLG consultation gives some pointers but not all• How will convergence ‘end’?
Average level or property level? Actual rent or limit rent? re-lets at formula
• The big unknown (still) What ‘control’ mechanism
• after 2014.15 limit rent?• under UC?
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 18
What have others been doing?
• One last shot at reaching target Why plus £2? Why not plus £4? RPI 3.2% - how big would the rise be to reach
target? To target with cap on maximum increase
• Model BP impact giving options• Informed conversations with members and tenants
in light of the self-financing regime• Greater transparency – link between rent and
services/investment is now explicit
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
HRA Ring-fence
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 20
Inside Housing
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
Ring fence issues• HRA ring fence introduced 1990
– Applies to revenue not capital– But some sources of capital finance are ring fenced – principally
revenue-backed (depreciation)– Increasingly applies to debt - but not in a legal sense
• History repeating itself – Early 1990s ‘deflation’ – GF vs HRA relative position– Council vs ALMO or Corporate vs Housing or General Fund vs HRA
• Previous government looked to strengthen guidance– Around the ‘who benefits’ principle– Not taken forward: downside of localism?
• Important that the debate now takes place on a rational basis around service delivery
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
Ring fence issues (2)• The council housing/ALMO & general services debate
– Assets and where they are sitting – Services on estates and in communities– Strategic housing services– Sharing and support services– Reserves and other resources
• How can landlord services assist in this debate?– HRA reserves– Cross-subsidisation of services - transparently
• Transparency essential – but so is showing the housing contribution to the whole
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
Right to Buy
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 24
Right to buy – National picture
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 25
Right to buy – National picture
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 26
RTB progress
26
GROSS RIGHT TO BUY RECEIPTS
Transaction
allowance
LA share cap
Government share cap Buy-back allowance
used Amount for reinvestment
Attributable debt on
additional sales
LA Retains Paid to Government Subject to agreement
• The downside...? Increase (doubling?) in activity; initial spike in applications working
through the process and more interest in recent announcements• The upside...?
Beyond the self financing settlement numbers, all additional receipts retained...
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
New build
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 28
New build council housing• A landscape with growing diversity and flexibility - already• A persuasive narrative...
Appetite for new build ‘under the cap’ already demonstrated Stimulated exploration of other options: ALMOs and SPVs,
JVCs and institutional investment Working closely with pension funds, insurance companies,
private equity Self financing has opened the debate: by no means is this just
about ‘council housing at social rent in the HRA’ Range of tenures and flexibility around ‘products’
• Capacity and knowledge is growing
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
Raising or abolishing the debt cap…?• Councils will deliver programmes from the headroom that
they have (some borrowing but mainly revenue/reserves)• A three-way ‘lobby for growth’: ongoing
– Changing borrowing rules– Abolishing the debt cap– Raising the debt cap – on a formula- or bid-basis
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 290
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
With investment Existing system
• “Let’s get building”– New build in plans – our
estimate 20-25,000 in first 5-10 years
– Financial capacity overall up to 200,000-250,000 homes: need land(!)
– £7billion capacity and appetite - 60,000+
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
Debt cap budget announcement
• Significant attitude change even if not significant money
• Role for the LEPs in distributing funds– Encourage LEPs to think about housing (!)
• Detail not yet known– Process - How onerous?– Available to who?– Links to selling high value stock?– What vfm tests?
• Risks of not delivering…
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org
Are we still all better off?
Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 32
Questions and debate
Ben Taylor – Assistant Director CIH consultancy
e-mail: [email protected]: 07974724041
32