lecture 13: relational decomposition and relational algebra february 5 th, 2003

36
Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th , 2003

Upload: sophia-ryan

Post on 19-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Lecture 13:

Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra

February 5th, 2003

Page 2: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Summary of Previous Discussion

• FD’s are given as part of the schema. You derived keys from them. You can also specify keys directly (they’re just another FD)

• First, compute the keys and the FD’s that hold on the relation you’re considering.

• Then, look for violations of BCNF. There may be a few. Choose one.

Page 3: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Summary (continued)

• You may need to decompose the decomposed relations:– To decide that, you need to project the FD’s on

the decomposed relations.– The end result may differ, depending on which

violation you chose to decompose by. They’re all correct.

• Relations with 2 attributes are in BCNF.

Page 4: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Summary (continued –2)

• If you have only a single FD representing a key, then the relation is in BCNF.

• But, you can still have another FD that forces you to decompose.

• This is all really pretty simple if you think about it long enough.

Page 5: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Boyce-Codd Normal Form

A simple condition for removing anomalies from relations:

In English (though a bit vague):

Whenever a set of attributes of R is determining another attribute, should determine all the attributes of R.

A relation R is in BCNF if:

Whenever there is a nontrivial dependency A1, ..., An B

in R , {A1, ..., An} is a key for R

A relation R is in BCNF if:

Whenever there is a nontrivial dependency A1, ..., An B

in R , {A1, ..., An} is a key for R

Page 6: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Example Decomposition Person(name, SSN, age, hairColor, phoneNumber)

SSN name, age, hairColorage hairColor

Decompose in BCNF (in class):

Step 1: find all keys ssn, phoneNumber

SSN, name, age, hairColorSSN, phoneNumber

Step 2: now decompose

Page 7: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Other Example

• R(A,B,C,D) A B, B C

• Keys:

• Violations of BCNF:

Page 8: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Correct Decompositions A decomposition is lossless if we can recover:

R(A,B,C)

R1(A,B) R2(A,C)

R’(A,B,C) should be the same as R(A,B,C)

R’ is in general larger than R. Must ensure R’ = R

Decompose

Recover

Page 9: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Correct Decompositions

• Given R(A,B,C) s.t. AB, the decomposition into R1(A,B), R2(A,C) is lossless

Page 10: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

3NF: A Problem with BCNFUnit Company Product

Unit Company

Unit Product

FD’s: Unit Company; Company, Product UnitSo, there is a BCNF violation, and we decompose.

Unit Company

No FDs

Page 11: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

So What’s the Problem?

Unit Company Product

Unit Company Unit Product

Galaga99 UW Galaga99 databasesBingo UW Bingo databases

No problem so far. All local FD’s are satisfied.Let’s put all the data back into a single table again:

Galaga99 UW databasesBingo UW databases

Violates the dependency: company, product -> unit!

Page 12: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Solution: 3rd Normal Form (3NF)

A simple condition for removing anomalies from relations:

A relation R is in 3rd normal form if :

Whenever there is a nontrivial dependency A1, A2, ..., An Bfor R , then {A1, A2, ..., An } a super-key for R, or B is part of a key.

A relation R is in 3rd normal form if :

Whenever there is a nontrivial dependency A1, A2, ..., An Bfor R , then {A1, A2, ..., An } a super-key for R, or B is part of a key.

Page 13: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Relational Algebra

• Formalism for creating new relations from existing ones

• Its place in the big picture:

Declartivequery

language

Declartivequery

languageAlgebraAlgebra ImplementationImplementation

SQL,relational calculus

Relational algebraRelational bag algebra

Page 14: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Relational Algebra• Five operators:

– Union: – Difference: -– Selection:– Projection: – Cartesian Product:

• Derived or auxiliary operators:– Intersection, complement– Joins (natural,equi-join, theta join, semi-join)– Renaming:

Page 15: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

1. Union and 2. Difference

• R1 R2

• Example: – ActiveEmployees RetiredEmployees

• R1 – R2

• Example:– AllEmployees -- RetiredEmployees

Page 16: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

What about Intersection ?

• It is a derived operator

• R1 R2 = R1 – (R1 – R2)

• Also expressed as a join (will see later)

• Example– UnionizedEmployees RetiredEmployees

Page 17: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

3. Selection

• Returns all tuples which satisfy a condition

• Notation: c(R)

• Examples– Salary > 40000 (Employee)

– name = “Smithh” (Employee)

• The condition c can be =, <, , >, , <>

Page 18: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Selection Example

EmployeeSSN Name DepartmentID Salary999999999 John 1 30,000777777777 Tony 1 32,000888888888 Alice 2 45,000

SSN Name DepartmentID Salary888888888 Alice 2 45,000

Find all employees with salary more than $40,000.Salary > 40000 (Employee)

Page 19: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

4. Projection

• Eliminates columns, then removes duplicates

• Notation: A1,…,An (R)

• Example: project social-security number and names:– SSN, Name (Employee)

– Output schema: Answer(SSN, Name)

Page 20: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Projection Example

EmployeeSSN Name DepartmentID Salary999999999 John 1 30,000777777777 Tony 1 32,000888888888 Alice 2 45,000

SSN Name999999999 John777777777 Tony888888888 Alice

SSN, Name (Employee)

Page 21: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

5. Cartesian Product

• Each tuple in R1 with each tuple in R2

• Notation: R1 R2

• Example: – Employee Dependents

• Very rare in practice; mainly used to express joins

Page 22: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Cartesian Product Example Employee Name SSN John 999999999 Tony 777777777 Dependents EmployeeSSN Dname 999999999 Emily 777777777 Joe Employee x Dependents Name SSN EmployeeSSN Dname John 999999999 999999999 Emily John 999999999 777777777 Joe Tony 777777777 999999999 Emily Tony 777777777 777777777 Joe

Page 23: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Relational Algebra• Five operators:

– Union: – Difference: -– Selection:– Projection: – Cartesian Product:

• Derived or auxiliary operators:– Intersection, complement– Joins (natural,equi-join, theta join, semi-join)– Renaming:

Page 24: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Renaming

• Changes the schema, not the instance

• Notation: B1,…,Bn (R)

• Example:– LastName, SocSocNo (Employee)

– Output schema: Answer(LastName, SocSocNo)

Page 25: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Renaming Example

EmployeeName SSNJohn 999999999Tony 777777777

LastName SocSocNoJohn 999999999Tony 777777777

LastName, SocSocNo (Employee)

Page 26: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Natural Join• Notation: R1 R2⋈• Meaning: R1 R2 = ⋈ A(C(R1 R2))

• Where:– The selection C checks equality of all common

attributes– The projection eliminates the duplicate common

attributes

Page 27: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Natural Join Example

EmployeeName SSNJohn 999999999Tony 777777777

DependentsSSN Dname999999999 Emily777777777 Joe

Name SSN DnameJohn 999999999 EmilyTony 777777777 Joe

Employee Dependents = Name, SSN, Dname( SSN=SSN2(Employee x SSN2, Dname(Dependents))

Page 28: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Natural Join

• R= S=

• R ⋈ S=

A B

X Y

X Z

Y Z

Z V

B C

Z U

V W

Z V

A B C

X Z U

X Z V

Y Z U

Y Z V

Z V W

Page 29: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Natural Join

• Given the schemas R(A, B, C, D), S(A, C, E), what is the schema of R ⋈ S ?

• Given R(A, B, C), S(D, E), what is R ⋈ S ?

• Given R(A, B), S(A, B), what is R ⋈ S ?

Page 30: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Theta Join

• A join that involves a predicate

• R1 ⋈ R2 = (R1 R2)

• Here can be any condition

Page 31: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Eq-join

• A theta join where is an equality

• R1 ⋈A=B R2 = A=B (R1 R2)

• Example:– Employee ⋈SSN=SSN Dependents

• Most useful join in practice

Page 32: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Semijoin

• R ⋉ S = A1,…,An (R ⋈ S)

• Where A1, …, An are the attributes in R

• Example:– Employee ⋉ Dependents

Page 33: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Semijoins in Distributed Databases

• Semijoins are used in distributed databases

SSN Name

. . . . . .

SSN Dname Age

. . . . . .

EmployeeDependents

network

Employee ⋈ssn=ssn (age>71 (Dependents))Employee ⋈ssn=ssn (age>71 (Dependents))

T = SSN age>71 (Dependents)R = Employee T⋉

Answer = R ⋈ Dependents

Page 34: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Complex RA Expressions

Person Purchase Person Product

name=fred name=gizmo

pid ssn

seller-ssn=ssn

pid=pid

buyer-ssn=ssn

name

Page 35: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Operations on Bags

A bag = a set with repeated elements

All operations need to be defined carefully on bags• {a,b,b,c}{a,b,b,b,e,f,f}={a,a,b,b,b,b,b,c,e,f,f}• {a,b,b,b,c,c} – {b,c,c,c,d} = {a,b,b,d}

• C(R): preserve the number of occurrences

• A(R): no duplicate elimination

• Cartesian product, join: no duplicate elimination

Important ! Relational Engines work on bags, not sets !

Reading assignment: 5.3 – 5.4

Page 36: Lecture 13: Relational Decomposition and Relational Algebra February 5 th, 2003

Finally: RA has Limitations !

• Cannot compute “transitive closure”

• Find all direct and indirect relatives of Fred• Cannot express in RA !!! Need to write C program

Name1 Name2 Relationship

Fred Mary Father

Mary Joe Cousin

Mary Bill Spouse

Nancy Lou Sister