lecture 14: fossil fuels ‐ coal february 26, 2009petra/phys3150/lecture14.pdf · lecture 14:...
TRANSCRIPT
Fossilfuels
• Oldestofalltechnologies:Burningfueltoprovideheat
• Morethan¾ofourpresent‐dayuseofprimaryenergyisfromfossilfuels
• Processofcombustion:chemicalreactionbetweenoxygen,usuallyfromsurroundingair,andtheconstituentelementsofthefuel,mainlycarbonandhydrogen
• Energyreleaseasheatwhichiscarriedawayinitiallybythecombustionproducts
2000
Coal• Incontrasttooil/gasmightbecalledignoblefuel– Lessconvenienttransportation,storageanduse– ProducestwicetheamountofCO2
Coal• Incontrasttooil/gasmightbecalledignoblefuel– Itsextractionleadstolandsubsidenceandspoilheaps
– Stripmining– Deathsofhundredsofminersinanaverageyear
CoalCombustion
• Extremelycomplexnature• ThecompositionofCoal:
– Carbonandhydrogen– Oxygenandnitrogen– Sulphurandothers– Inertmaterials
– moisture
CompositionofCoal
Amounts of inert materials and moistures obviously important when determining the heat value of coal
TheCombustionProcess• Earlystageofcombustion:
– moistureevaporates(moremoistureinbrowncoalthanhardcoal,between1%and10%)
– Heatingandevaporationusessomeoftheenergyofthecoal,butlessthan1%
• Temperaturecontinuestorise:arangeofgasesevolve,calledvolatilematter(VM):– Arisefromthedissociationofcoalstructure– Carrymostofthehydrogenandoxygen,someofitscarbon:CO,CH4,otherformsofhydrocarbons(bitumens)
– Releaseheatastheyburn,about50%ofthecoalsenergy
TheCombustionProcess• Combustiblepartofthematerialremains:
– fixedcarbon(charcoal,coke)– Canburnathightemperatureinoxygen:
– Dependingontypeofcoalthisaccountsforvirtuallyalltheheatoutputornomorethanhalf
• Finally:Ash(inertmaterialthatremains)– Bestcoalhaslessthan10%ofit– 15%notuncommon,andinsomecountries30%istoleratedifpriorityistouselocalcoal
CombustionProducts• Chemicalchangeofmaincomponents:
• Nitrogen:NOXorNox• Sulphur:SO2
– Sulphurcanaccountforasmuchas5%ofthemass
– Inhighsulphurcoalsabouthalfofitmaybeintheinertmaterial(removablebywashing)
– Evenlessthan1%releases20kgofSO2pertonneofburnedcoal
HowmuchCO2incombustionofonetonneofcoal?
• Assumeallthecarboninthecoalreactswithoxygen:
rel.atomicmass:122*1644
• So12kgofCproduces44kgofCO2or
• 1kgofCproduces3.67kgofCO2
• NowconsideronetonneoflowVMbituminouscoal:10%ismoistureorash‐>900kgofdryandashfreecoal
• 88%ofthiscoalcarbon‐>792kgofcarbon• SothemassofCO2releasedinthecombustionof1tonneofcoalis792kg*3.67=2.9tonnes
Fires,furnacesandboilers
• Thedestinationofapprox.¾offossilandbiofuelsisafire,furnaceorboiler
• Drivingfactorindesignofboilers:efficiencywithwhichenergyisextracted
• Betterdesign– Lowerfuelrequirements
– Lowercosts– LoweremissionofCO2andotherundesirableproducts
Howmuchwaterisneededtobringaliterofwatertoboil?
• Inputdata:– specificheatcapacityofwater=4200Jkg‐1K‐1
– Massof1literofwater=1kg
– Heatvalueofwood=15MJ/kg– Densityofwood=600kgm‐3
– 1cubiccentimeter=10‐6m3
Howmuchwaterisneededtobringaliterofwatertoboil?
• Calculation– Heatenergyneededtoheat1literofwaterfrom20oCto100oC
=80*4200J=336kJ
– Heatenergyreleasedinburning1cm3ofwood
=15*600*10‐6MJ=9.0kJ– Volumeofrequiredwood=336÷9.0cm3=37cm3
Suggests only one thin stick of about a food of wood is needed
Surprising result?
Why not that simple?
Sideremark:LatentHeat
amount of energy in the form of heat released or absorbed by a chemical substance during a change of state
Fires,furnacesandboilers• Thestovemighthaveonlyafuel‐to‐usefulheatefficiencyof10%,whichcanbecomparedto70%ofawellrundomesticgaswater‐heateror>90%foramodernpowerstationboiler
• Themajorconsumersofcoal:largepowerstationboilerstoproducesteam
• Usefultostudybecause:– Mostefficientfuel‐burningsystemswehave– Wasteproductscreatesomeoftheworld’smajorpollutionproblems
– Interestingtechnologicalsolutionsexist
PowerStationBoilers• Toextractthemaximumenergyfromthesolidfuel,bothfixedcarbonandtheVMmustbefullyburnt(notsimplesinceoneissolidandtheothergas)
• Bothmustbeburntataboutthesamerate• Purposeoftheplant:toproducesteam‐>thirdrequirementisforthebestpossibleheattransferfromtheburningfuelintothecirculatingwater
• Finally:minimizeby‐productsandincludeamethodtodealwithunavoidablewaste:ashandfluegas
• Aim:powerstationthatcandealsafelyandefficientlywithfuelswithverydifferentphysicalpropertiesandrangeofheatvalues
TheGrateboiler• Fuelisinpiecesofafewmillimetersacross
• Fedinfromahopperoronaconveyerbelt
• Moveacrossthegrateinanupwardflowofair
• Fixedcarbonburnsonthegrateandthevolatilematterinthespaceabove
• Radiantheatfrombothreachesarrayoftubesthroughwhichthewatercirculates
• Thehotgasesfromthecombustionreachanothersetoftubes
TheGrateboiler
• Boilersofthistypearestillusedforcoal,butmainlyforbiofuelssuchaswoodchips,processeddomesticwastesetc.,notsuitableforpulverizedfuelboilers
• Increasinglyreplacedwithcleanermoreefficientboilers
PulverizedFuelBoilers
• Mostcommonboilertypeinpresent‐daycoal‐firedpowerstations
• inuseformorethanhalfacentury
• Cantransfer>90%oftheenergycontentofthecoaltothecirculatingwaterorsteam
• Pulverizedfuel(PF):coalentersthefurnaceintheformofparticleslessthanabout100microns
• Coaldustsweptinacontrolledflowofairtotheburnerjets• Tinyparticles‐>thefixedcarbonburnscompletelyinashorttime‐>VMandfixedcarbonburntogetherinroughlythesamepartofthefurnace‐>efficiencyincreaseinheattransfer
PulverizedFuelBoilers
• Shorttimethatfuelspendsinthefurnace‐>reducestheproductionofNOXandothercombustionproducts
• Carefulcontroloftheair/fuelmixtureisrequired(notenoughair:unburntcharintheashorCOinthefluegases
toomuchair:promotesproductionofundesirableoxidesandreducestheefficiencybycarryingawaymoreheatinthefluegases)
• On‐linemonitoring(controloffluegasflow,particlesize)• DisadvantageofPFboilers:ashisfinedustthatwillbecarriedintotheatmospherewithoutpreventivemeasures
FluidizedBedBoilers• Fluidizedbedcombustion(FBC)
– offerssolutionstosomeofthepollutionproblemsofcoalcombustion
– Possibilityofburningotherfuelscleanly• 1980s:firstplantsonstream• Bytheendof2000:afew1000• Essentialfeature:thicklayerofinertmaterial(sandorgravel(particlesizesof0.3‐2.0mm)onthebaseplate
• Baseplatehassmallaperturesthroughwhichjetsofairareblown
• Atacertainairspeed:thicknessofmaterialexpandstoadepthof>1mandstartstobehavelikeliquid
FluidizedBedBoilers• Airflowfurtherincreased:formsbubblesrisingthroughthebed‐>particlesbouncearoundasiftheywereaboilingliquid
• Fuelparticlesarefedintothebed• Constantmotionandairflow‐>bothfixedcarbonandVMburnquicklyandheattheentirebed
• Watertubesareburiedinthebedandorcontainmentwalls‐>excellentthermalcontact‐>goodheattransferdoesnotrequirethehightemperaturesofanopenfurnace
• Bubblingfluidizedbedcombustion(BFBC):majorityofplants
Sowhyhasbituminouscoalbetterheatvaluethananthracite?
The relative proportion of fixed carbon and volatile matter generally indicative of the different ranks.
FBB:Othersystems• Circulatingfluidizedbedcombustion(CFBC):
– Developedalittlelater,butrapidgrowth(>1000since2000)– Increasedairflowdrivesparticlesinthespaceabovethefluidizedbed‐>behavelikeahotgas
– Circulatingsystem:constantlyreturnsparticlestothebed‐>hightemperatureismaintained‐>increaseoftimeforcombustion‐>widerrangeofcoalsandotherfluidscanbeused
• Pressurizedfluidizedbedcombustion(PFBC):– Mostadvanced,canproduce250MW– BasedontheBFBC,buthigherpressureinthefurnace(~10atm)‐>hotgasesfromthefurnacecanbeusedinagasturbineaswellasraisingsteamforthesteamturbine(combined‐cycle)
• Pressurizedcirculatingsystemsunderdevelopment
FlueGases• Quantitieswhichmightbereleasedintotheatmospherebyamodern660MWcoal‐firedpowerstationinonehour(figuresareapproximate):– 2500tonnesofNitrogen,80%oftheair,passunchangedthroughthewholesystembutheatingitaccountsforabouthalfoftheenergylossintheboiler
– 700tonnesofcarbondioxide‐>climate– >150tonnesofsteam(moistureinthecoal,combustionproduct),notcondensingitaccountsfortheotherhalfoflostenergy,butfluegasesneedtostayhotiftheyaretorisethroughatallchimney
FlueGases• Quantitieswhichmightbereleasedintotheatmospherebyamodern660MWcoal‐firedpowerstationinonehour(figuresareapproximate):– AtonneofNOX:ThehigherthefurnacetemperaturethegreatertheproductionofNOX‐>acidrain,otherhealthdamages
– 1–20tonnesofsulphurdioxide,powerstationofthisexampleproducesabout4tonnesofSO2inonehourfromcoalwith1%sulphur‐>acidrain
– 10‐20tonnesofflyash(particulates)resultingfromburningpulverizedcoal‐>visibleasdirt,tinyparticlescandamagelungsandcontainpoisonousimpurities.
FlueGasandFBC
• Fluidizedbedboilers’approach:Don’tproducethem:– Sulphurcomponentsarereducedatsourcebyintroducinglimestone:SO2reactswithlimestone
– ‐>calciumsulphate(canberemovedfromthebed)– NOXproductionreducedbykeepingbedtemperature<1000degC(2000degCinconventionalplant)
– Smallerquantitiesofparticulatesthaninpulverizedfuelplant
FlueGasRemovel• ThefluegasesofFBCboilersarecleanedusingthesamemethodsasinPFplants
• InthecaseofPFBCparticulateremovalisanintegralfeatureoftheplantsincethegasesmustbecleanedtoahighstandardbeforetheycanbeusedinagasturbine
FlueGasRemovel• Particulateremoval:
• bagfilters(methodofatraditionalhouseholdvacuumcleaner,inefficientforparticlesizesof<10microns)
• cyclonefilters(particlesarethrownoutwardsfromthefastspinningair,inefficientforparticlesizesof<10microns)
• Electrostaticprecipitation(fineparticlesacquireanelectricchargebypassingnearahigh‐voltagewireandarepulledside‐waysoutofthegasstreambyanelectricalfield,effectiveforverysmallparticles,butcapitalcostsconsiderablyhigher)
• Combinationoftheabove
FlueGasDesulphurization
• FGDusuallyinvolvesreactingtheSO2withfinelydividedlimestone(CaCO3,calciumcarbonate)
• Usuallyaslurryorsprayorjetsofwaterareusedtobringthelimestoneintocontactwiththefluegas‐>insolublecalciumsulphateprecipitatesandcanberemoved
• Involvedcosts:– Electrostaticprecipitation:5%tothecapitalcostofanewpowerstation
– FGDasmuch15%andusesenergy‐>reducesoverallefficiencyofplant‐>increasescostsperenergyunit
Whydoveryfewpowerplantsworld‐widereachthebestachievablereductionsofthepollutants?
• Putintocontext:– 3000tonnes/hourofgasesleavetheboiler– Hotterthanthehottestdomesticoven(1000‐2000
oC)
– ParticulatelevelgreaterthanintheworsteverSaltLakeCitysmog
– aconcentrationofSO2a1000timesworsethandowntownL.A.onabadday
– Enoughmoisturetocauseittostartraininginthegasstreamifthetemperaturefallsbelowthatofamoderateoven
Whydoveryfewpowerplantsworld‐widereachthebestachievablereductionsofthepollutants?
• Anycleaningsystem– mustbeabletohandlethishot,dirtycorrosivemassonacontinuousbasis
– Shouldremovemostofthepollutants,currentaims:~90%ofSO2and99%ofparticulates
– Shoulduseaslittleenergyaspossible– Shouldleaveenvironmentallyacceptableresidues– Andshouldbecheap
• Thereisnosuchsystem
EmissionTrading• Administrativeapproachusedtocontrolpollution,akacapandtrade
• Howitworks:– Centralauthority(government,internationalbody)setsacapontheamountofapollutantthatcanbeemitted
– Companiesetc.areissuedemissionpermitsandarequiredtoholdanequivalentamountofallowancesorcredits
– Totalofallowancesmustnotexceedcap– Companiesthatneedtoincreasetheirallowancesmustbycreditsfromthecompanieswhopolluteless
EmissionTrading• Effect:buyerispayingchargeforpollutant,sellerisbeingrewardedforreducingpollution
• Intheory:thosewhocanreduceemissionsmostcheaplywilldoso‐>pollutionreductionatthelowestpossiblecoststosociety
• Examples:GreenhousegasestradingprogramintheEU,SO2andNOXtradingprogramintheUS
• Contrast:directemissiontaxes• Pro:mostofthemoneystaysinthesystemandisspentonsustainableprojects,reducescosttocontrolacidrain(incaseofofSO2)
• Contra:complexity,monitoring,enforcement,dispute,manipulation,toomanyemissioncredits
EmissionTrading
• FinancialTimesin2007:“Carbonmarketscreateamuddle”and“…leavemuchroomforunverifiableinformation”
ComparisonofEmissionTradingwithruledbasedsystem
• Europe:ruledbased• US:sulfurdioxidetradingsysteminstitutedin1990
CleanCoalInitiative
• "Coalisanabundantresourceintheworld...Itisimperativethatwefigureoutawaytousecoalascleanlyaspossible.”
Dr.StevenChu,SecretaryofEnergy
SenateConfirmationHearing
January13,2009
CleanCoalInitiative
• FromtheDOEwebsite:””Cleancoaltechnology"describesanewgenerationofenergyprocessesthatsharplyreduceairemissionsandotherpollutantsfromcoal‐burningpowerplants.”
CleanCoalInitiative
• FromtheDOEwebsite:"Inthelate1980sandearly1990s,theU.S.DepartmentofEnergyconductedajointprogramwithindustryandStateagenciestodemonstratethebestofthesenewtechnologiesatscaleslargeenoughforcompaniestomakecommercialdecisions.Morethan20ofthetechnologiestestedintheoriginalprogramachievedcommercialsuccess.”
CleanCoalInitiative• FromtheDOEwebsite:"Theearlyprogram,however,wasfocusedontheenvironmentalchallengesofthetime‐primarilyconcernsovertheimpactofacidrainonforestsandwatersheds.Inthe21stcentury,additionalenvironmentalconcernshaveemerged‐thepotentialhealthimpactsoftraceemissionsofmercury,theeffectsofmicroscopicparticlesonpeoplewithrespiratoryproblems,andthepotentialglobalclimate‐alteringimpactofgreenhousegases.”
CleanCoalInitiative• ThreeprojectsattheUniversityofUtah:① FundamentalsofMercuryOxidationinFlueGas‐
This$539,000project(DOEshare:$397,000):• developknowledgeandmodelsneededbyutilityoperatorstomeetexpectedEPAmercuryregulations
• focusonunderstandingmercuryoxidationreactionchemistryincludingtheeffectsofchlorine,nitrogenoxide,sulfurdioxide,andashparticlereactions.
② MaterialsforPowerPlantSensors(DOEup$608k):• developnovelmicroscalegassensingdevicessuitableforapplicationinexhaustgasstreamsofpowerplants.
• devicesthatcantoleratetheseconditionswhilestillaccuratelysensingverysmalllevelsofgasessuchascarbondioxideandnitrogenoxides.
CleanCoalInitiative• ThreeprojectsattheUniversityofUtah:③ Corrosion‐ResistantCoatingsforPowerPlants–
(DOEshare:$200,000):• developacommericiallyviablecoatingtechnology
basedonnanocrystallineintermetallicmaterialsforadvancedcoal‐firedpowergenerationsystemsforwhichcorrosionresistanceandcreepstrengthathightemperaturesarecritical