lecture 18 case studies ii april 6, 2010

56
Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Upload: mele

Post on 25-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010. www.sunherald.com. Biological and Physical Importance. Diversity Fisheries and leisure Protection from storms Endemic spp. Marshbirds. 40%. 30%. * Adapted from McFadden et al. 2007. 37%. 32%. 20%. Saltmarsh converted to open water - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Lecture 18Case Studies IIApril 6, 2010

Page 2: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Biological and Physical Importance

• Diversity• Fisheries and leisure• Protection from storms• Endemic spp.

– Marshbirds

www.sunherald.com

Page 3: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Threats to the Gulf

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Texas Louisiana Alabama Florida

37%

26% 26%

32%

Saltm

arsh

con

vert

ed to

ope

n w

ater

Pred

icte

d be

twee

n 20

00 -

2060

*Adapted from McFadden et al. 2007

Page 4: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Life history characteristics

Thin as a rail

The Birds of North America

Coloration

Other attributes

Page 5: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Purpose and Goals of Study

Page 6: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

OCCUPANCY OF SELECT MARSH BIRDS WITHIN

TIDAL MARSHES OF THE NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO:

CURRENT ESTIMATES AND PROJECTED CHANGE

Page 7: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Projections and Anticipations Study rationale

Loss of area

Loss of edge

Loss of interspersion

Increased saline incursionwww.flood.firetree.net

Current 1 m sea-level rise

Page 8: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Marsh Bird Surveys: Methods

AL: 2004 -108 survey points

MS: 2005 -119 survey points

2 surveys per point

Species detected at < 100m

Least Bittern, Seaside Sparrow, Common Moorhen, Purple Gallinule, and Clapper Rail

Page 9: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Landscape Features* Used GIS to Calculate % of landscape developed within

1000m of survey points

1000m

Page 10: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

GIS for Landscape Features

INTERSPERSION

EDGE

AREA

JUNCUS

Page 11: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Clapper Rail Occupancy

Naïve estimate 71% 64 – 78%

Covariate Mean 95% CI Direction

INTERSPERSION 2.48 0.72 – 4.24 +JUNCUS 8.98 3.86 – 14.1 +

INTERSPERSION JUNCUS

Page 12: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Clapper Rail Response

What could this mean and why

Study caveats number of surveys area covered non-linear responses, etc.

Page 13: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

VARIATION IN THE NESTING HABITS OF CLAPPER RAILS IN RESPONSE TO TIDAL MARSH

HABITAT

Page 14: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

0 2 41

Kilometers

0 2 41

Kilometers

Focal Estuaries

Pascagoula Marsh Coastal Preserve

Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve

Page 15: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Habitat DifferencesPascagoula

0 2 41

Kilometers

4500 ha

Hydrology – river-dominated

Habitats: Juncus roemerianus

Spartina alterniflora

Oligo to mesohaline (salinity range)

Unique (Odum, Wilson, Elueterius)

Page 16: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Grand Bay

0 2 41

Kilometers

7000 ha

Hydrology – marine-dominated

Habitats: Juncus roemerianus

Spartina alterniflora

Meso to polyhaline (salinity range)

Unique (Odum, Wilson)

Page 17: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Clapper Rail Nest Success

• Factors affecting nest success– Flooding / predation

• Why study nest success

• Why important – future trends

Page 18: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Nest data collection

• Nest location• Nest data collection• Veg data• Nest success

Page 19: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Nests and Habitat

• Monitored 76 nests (54 at Pascagoula, 22 Grand Bay)

• Nest success loss was low (10 at Pascagoula, 5 at Grand Bay)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Pascagoula Grand BayPerc

ent n

est l

oss

to fl

oodi

ng

Page 20: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Nests and HabitatV

eget

atio

n he

ight

(cm

)

0

40

80

120

160Clapper Rail nests

Control points

0

400

800

1200

1600

Pascagoula Grand Bay

Stem

den

sity

(m2 )

Vegetation height

Stem density

Page 21: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Nest success

Grand Bay PascagoulaNest survival 0.98, 0.96 to 0.99 0.99, 0.98 to 1.00

Effect of nest initiation date 0.0004, -0.01 to 0.01 0.01, 0.05 x 102 to 0.02

Page 22: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

CLAPPER RAIL DIET COMPOSITION AND EGG

RESOURCES VARY ACROSS TWO HYDROLOGICALLY DYNAMIC

ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEMS

Page 23: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Clapper Rail Diet

Baises in gut content analysis

Feeding studies

Assimilation relationships

Why is it important to study diet

Page 24: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Stable Isotopes and Estuaries

Odum, W.E. 1988. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:147-176.

Juncus: C3Spartina: C4

Distinct Carbon Isotopic Signature

Spartina Juncus

-14 ‰ -26 ‰

Page 25: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Isotopes and Tissues

pectoral muscle

Reflects diet over several weeks to months

liver

Reflects diet over several hours to days

egg yolk

Reflects diet over several hours to days

Page 26: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Niche Breadth and Diet

13C (‰)

15 N

(‰)

Source A Source B

Source C

Population A

Population B

8

6

4

2

-27 -25 -23 -21 -19

Page 27: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

CollectionPascagoula Grand Bay

Species / Tissue n n

Clapper Rail

Egg yolk 28 8

Liver 5 6

Pectoral muscle 5 8

Spartina sp. 18 3

J. roemerianus 23 7

olive nerite 22 0

marsh periwinkle 8 8

ribbed mussel 2 8

common rangia 14 1

Tettigoniids (grasshoppers) 10 3

blue crab 3 3

gulf fiddler crab 14 8

Page 28: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Estuarine Differences: Hydrology, Food web differences

0

25

50

75

100

0

25

50

75

100

0

25

50

75

100

Muscle

Liver

Egg yolk

Pascagoula

Grand Bay

Page 29: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Trophic Niche Breadth

Page 30: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Egg Yolk Lipids and Fiddler Crabs

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Fiddler crab burrows/0.5 m2

Prop

ortio

n of

lipi

ds in

egg

yol

ks

Page 31: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Clapper Rails and Fiddler Crabs

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Grand Bay Pasc. Grand Bay Pasc. Grand Bay Pasc.2006 2007 2008

Estuary/year

010

2030

4050

Page 32: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Fiddler Crab Life History

Page 33: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Rain and Distributions

Page 34: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Projected Precipitation Change

Page 35: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Predicted Habitat Change

www.flood.firetree.net

Current 1 m sea-level rise

Page 36: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

THE INFLUENCE THE INFLUENCE OF OF

ACID RAIN ON THE ACID RAIN ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF PRODUCTIVITY OF PURPLE MARTINS: PURPLE MARTINS:

A CONTINENT-WIDE, MULTI-YEAR A CONTINENT-WIDE, MULTI-YEAR

PERSPECTIVEPERSPECTIVE

Page 37: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Purple Martin

Page 38: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

OutlineOutline• Acid Rain and Songbirds • Purple Martins

Methods

• Project Martinwatch • Precipitate Components • Soil pH

Results

• Acid Rain and Purple Martins

Page 39: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Acid RainAcid Rain

Transportation 7%

Fuel Combustion 3%

Electrical Utilities 25%

Transportation 53%

Other 5%

Industrial Sources 12%

Fuel Combustion 5%

Other 8%

Electrical Utilities 67%

Industrial Sources 15%

SOSO22 Source USA 1998 Source USA 1998

NONO33 Source USA 1998 Source USA 1998

Abstracted from Environment Canada www. ec.gc.ca/acidrain/acidfact.html

Page 40: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Acid Rain and SongbirdsAcid Rain and Songbirds

www.courses.washington.edu/vertebra/453/photos/sk

Page 41: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Environmental CalciumEnvironmental Calcium

M. Gillilland www.msu.edu/~gillilla/snailsofmich.html

Page 42: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Acid Rain and Wood ThrushAcid Rain and Wood Thrush

Hames et al. 2002

Page 43: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Purple MartinPurple Martin

Page 44: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Project MartinwatchProject Martinwatch

Page 45: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Locations for This StudyLocations for This Study

www.geographynetwork.comwww.geographynetwork.com

Page 46: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

National Atmospheric Deposition National Atmospheric Deposition ProgramProgram

www. nadp.sws.uiuc.edu

Page 47: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Soil pHSoil pH

WWW.STATSGO.COM

Page 48: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Age EffectsAge Effects

Page 49: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Adult Age EffectsAdult Age Effects

4.2

4.6

5

5.4

Bro

od S

ize

Bro

od S

ize

Male ASYMale ASY

Female ASYFemale ASY

Male ASYMale ASY

Female SYFemale SY

Male SYMale SY

Female ASYFemale ASY

Male SYMale SY

Female SYFemale SY

Page 50: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

House TypeHouse Type

Page 51: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

4

4.2

4.4

4.6

4.8

5

5.2

Wooden House

Plastic Gourd

Natural Gourd

Metal House

Effect of House TypeEffect of House TypeC

lutc

h or

Bro

od S

ize

Clu

tch

or B

rood

Siz

e EggsEggs

HatchedHatched

FledgedFledged

Page 52: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Supplementary CalciumSupplementary Calcium

Page 53: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Effects on Eggs and HatchlingsEffects on Eggs and Hatchlings

  EffectEffect SESE

SOSO44 -0.14-0.14 0.0760.076

EggsEggs

HatchedHatched

   EffectEffect SESESOSO44 -0.067-0.067 0.0380.038

~ Loss of 0.7 eggs / nest

Page 54: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

Influence of Acid RainInfluence of Acid Rain

Page 55: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

HabitatHabitat

Page 56: Lecture 18 Case Studies II April 6, 2010

What Does This Mean?What Does This Mean?

Area of eastern Canada expected to receive SO4 deposition above critical loads (kg ha-1y-1) in 2010, without further controls beyond provisions in the 1991 Canada-

U.S. Air Quality Agreement.

Area of eastern Canada expected to receive SO4 deposition above critical loads (kg ha-1y-1) with

targeted emission reductions of 50% in Ontario, 50% in Quebec, 30% in New Brunswick, 25% in

Nova Scotia and 60% in the United States