lecture ii superconductivity · uspas course on superconducting accelerator magnets, june 23-27,...

41
Superconducting Magnet Division Ramesh Gupta, BNL USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 1 of Lecture II Superconductivity Ramesh Gupta Superconducting Magnet Division Brookhaven National Laboratory Lecture II US Particle Accelerator School University of California – Santa Barbara June 23-27, 2003

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 1 of Lecture II

Superconductivity

Ramesh GuptaSuperconducting Magnet Division Brookhaven National Laboratory

Lecture II

US Particle Accelerator SchoolUniversity of California – Santa Barbara

June 23-27, 2003

Page 2: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 2 of Lecture II

Basic Superconductivity

An Introduction to Superconductivity

• It will not be a general course onsuperconductivity

•The purpose of this lecture is to give you abrief introduction to the parts that are relevantto designing superconducting acceleratormagnets

Page 3: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 3 of Lecture II

The SuperconductivityR

RR

=ρ(2

73K

)/ρ(~

4K)

Hig

h pu

rity

copp

er h

as la

rger

RR

R

Resistivity of Cu as a function of Temperature Resistance of Mercury falls suddenly below

measurement accuracy at very low temperature

First observation of “Superconductivity” by Onnes (1911)

Temperature (K)

Res

ista

nce

(Ohm

s)

Page 4: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 4 of Lecture II

Superconducting Accelerator MagnetsA Brief History

1908 Heinke Kemerlingh Onnes achieves very low temperature (<4.2 K)1911 Onnes and Holst observe sudden drop in resistivity to essentially zero

Superconductivity is born !1914 Persistent current experiments1933 Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect observed1935 Fritz and London theory1950 Ginsburg - Landau theory1957 BCS Theory1967 Observation of Flux Tubes in Type II superconductors1980 Tevatron: The first accelerator using superconducting magnets1986 First observation of High Temperature SuperconductorsIt took ~70 years to get first accelerator from conventional superconductors.How long will it take for HTS to get to accelerator magnets? Have patience!

Page 5: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 5 of Lecture II

Critical Surface of Nb-Ti

What a magnet designer always dreams for ?: A material that remains superconducting at higher temperatures and at higher fields.

Critical SurfaceThe surface on 3-d (J,T,B) volume within which the material remain superconducting.

Operating point of the magnet must stay within this volume with a suitable margin.

Page 6: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 6 of Lecture II

Meissner Effect

A remarkable observation in superconductors:They exclude the magnet flux lines from going through it.

Attenuation of magnetic field andshielding currents in Type I superconductors

Normal Conductor Superconductor

Courtesy: Wilson

Courtesy: Schmuser

Meissner and Ochsenfeld (1933)

Page 7: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 7 of Lecture II

Type I and Type II Superconductors

Type I: Also known as the

“soft superconductors”. Completely exclude the flux lines. Allow only small field (< 0.1 T). Not good for accelerator magnets.

Type II: Also known as the “hard superconductors”. Completely exclude flux lines up to Bc1 but then part of the flux enters till Bc2 Important plus: Allow much higher fields. Examples: NbTi, Nb3Sn

Courtesy: Schmuser

Normal phase

Page 8: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 8 of Lecture II

Critical Surface ofType I Superconductors

Critical Temperature (K)

Crit

ical

Fie

ld B

c (T)

0.0

0.3

0.6

0.9

Type Isuperconductorsare obviouslyNOT suitable forhigh field magnetapplications.

Page 9: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 9 of Lecture II

Critical Surface of Type II LowTemperature Superconductors (LTS)

• Conductors that are currently being used in building accelerator magnets are Type IILow Temperature Superconductors.• NbTi, a ductile material, has been the conductor of choice so far. All acceleratormachine magnets have been and are being built with this superconductor.• For future high field magnet applications one must turn to Nb3Sn, etc.(higher Bc2).However, Nb3Sn is brittle nature, and presents many challenge in building magnets.

Not shown here: MgB2 (39 K)

Page 10: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 10 of Lecture II

Magnesium Diboride (MgB2)

Magnesium Diboride (MgB2) Discovered in January 2001 (Akimitsu) LTS with Tc: ~39 KA low temperature superconductor with high Tc

The basic powder is very cheap, andabundantly available. The championperformance is continuously improvingin terms of Jc and Bc. However, it is stillnot available in sufficient lengths formaking little test coils.

Page 11: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 11 of Lecture II

London Penetration Depthand Coherence Length

• “London Penetration Depth” tells how field falls• “Coherence Length” tells how does cooper pair density increases

Courtesy: Schmuser

κ = λL/ξGinzburg-Landau Parameter

Nb is type II superconductor

Page 12: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 12 of Lecture II

Current Transport inBulk Superconductors

Courtesy: Schmuser

Motion of these fluxoids generates heat.

Page 13: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 13 of Lecture II

Nb-Ti Microstructure

A high critical current density microstructure in a conventionally processed Nb-Ti microstructure (UW strand). Courtesy: P.J. Lee (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Page 14: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 14 of Lecture II

Difference Between the SuperconductorRequirements for Superconducting RF Cavities andSuperconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

• For superconducting RF cavities, one needs veryhigh purity materials, with no defects.

• For superconducting magnets, the presence ofcertain defects is essential, as without those defects,it can not stand those high fields.

Page 15: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 15 of Lecture II

Flux Jumping

Initially, when the field is raised, large screening current are generated to oppose thechanges. These current densities may be much larger than Jc which will create Jouleheating. However, these large currents soon die and attenuate to Jc, which persist.

Page 16: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 16 of Lecture II

Instability from Flux Jumping

Courtesy: Wilson

Page 17: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 17 of Lecture II

Stability Criteria Against Flux Jumping

aC T T

Jc

c

o

o<

−32

( )µ

∆Q heat increases temperature ∆T and reduces Jc by ∆Jc

Calculate if this creates an unstable (runaway) situation?B(x) = Bo - µo Jc (a-x) hφ(x)= Bo x - µo Jc (ax-x2/2) hChange in flux due to change in Jc: ∆φ(x)= µo ∆J (ax-x2/2)hAdditional heat due to flux motion: ∆q = = µo Jc ∆Jc a2/3To first order ∆Jc = Jc ∆T / (Tc-To), thus ∆q = µo J2

c a2 /[3(Tc-To)] ∆T

Total heat to raise the temperature: ∆Q + ∆q = C ∆Twhere C is specific heat per unit volume∆Q = C ∆T - ∆q = {C- µo J2

c a2 /[3(Tc-To)] }∆T = C’ ∆Twhere C’ = {C- µo J2

c a2 /[3(Tc-To)] } is the effective specific heat.For stability condition, the effective specific heat must be positive.This determines the maximum slab thickness “a” for stabilitySimilarly determine condition for filament of diameter r.The computed filament diameter for flux stability in NbTi is < 40 µ; for safety margin use ~ 20 µ.

rC T T

Jc

c

o

o<

−πµ4

32

( )

∫ ∆φ(x) J dx c0

x

Assignment:Go through theexpressions.

Page 18: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 18 of Lecture II

Magnetization Effects inSuperconducting Filaments

Courtesy: Schmuser

The abovemagnetization createspersistent current, amajor issue in SCmagnets.

Persistent current induced magnetization:

Page 19: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 19 of Lecture II

Persistent Current-induced Harmonicsin High Field (Nb3Sn Magnets)

Courtesy: Ghosh

Measured magnetization (NbTi)Persistent current induced magnetization :

Problem in Nb3Sn Magnets because(a) Jc is higher by several times(b) Filament size is big and gets biggerafter reaction due to sintering

In most Nb3Sn available today, the effective filament diameter is an order of magnitude larger than thatin NbTi. The obvious solution is to reduce filament diameter; however, in some cases it also reduces Jc.

A small filament diameter is important for :• increasing stability• reducing persistent currents

Page 20: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 20 of Lecture II

Persistent Current-induced Harmonics(may be a problem in Nb3Sn magnets, if done nothing)

Nb3Sn superconductor, with the technology under use now, is expected to generate persistent current-induced harmonics which are a factor of 10-100 worse than those measured in Nb-Ti magnets.

In addition, a snap-back problem is observed when the acceleration starts (ramp-up) after injection atsteady state (constant field).

Measured sextupole harmonicin a Nb-Ti magnet

Measured sextupole harmonicin a Nb3Sn magnet

Snap back

Either reduce the effective filament diameter or come up with a magnetic designthat minimizes the effect of magnetization in the magnets (LBL, FNAL, TAMU).

Page 21: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 21 of Lecture II

Manufacturing of Nb-Ti Wires

Page 22: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 22 of Lecture II

A Typical Superconducting Cable

Filaments in an actual cable(Filament size in SSC/RHIC magnets: 6 micron)

Page 23: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 23 of Lecture II

Stability of Superconducting Wire(Wire is Made of Many Filaments)

Filaments not coupled Coupled filaments

A wire composed of twisted filaments

Courtesy: Wilson

Rutherford cable

Page 24: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 24 of Lecture II

Interstrand Coupling

Courtesy: Devred

Page 25: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 25 of Lecture II

Influence of Interstrand Coupling

Courtesy: Devred

Page 26: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II

Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

Courtesy: P. Lee (U Of W-M)

A Reasonable Assumption:3 T increase between4.2 K and 1.8 K

LHC will operate at 1.8 K; all current accelerators operate at ~4.5 K. All use Nb-Ti.

Page 27: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 27 of Lecture II

Courtesy: Ghosh

Cable Measurement Set-up

Page 28: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 28 of Lecture II

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000Is (A)

Vs (µ

V)

LOCALLY DAMAGED CABLE.

SMOOTH CABLE

Nb3Sn Cable in Cu- Channel

Courtesy: Ghosh

n-value:A good indicator ofthe quality of cable.

A lower “n-value” meansa slow transition fromsuperconducting tonormal phase, whichgenerally indicates somesort of damage in thecable.

V ∝ (I/Ic)n

Page 29: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 29 of Lecture II

The Conventional Low Temperature Superconductors (LTS)and the New High Temperature Superconductors (HTS)

Resistance of Mercury falls suddenly belowmeas. accuracy at very low (4.2) temperature

Low Temperature Superconductor Onnes (1911)

Temperature (K)

Res

ista

nce

(Ohm

s)

New materials (ceramics) loose their resistanceat NOT so low temperature (Liquid Nitrogen)!High Temperature Superconductors (HTS)

Page 30: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 30 of Lecture II

Critical Surface of HighTemperature Superconductors (HTS)

HTS (this example, BSCCO2212) can operate at a temperature much higher than ~4 Krequired for conventional LTS; say 20K (or even more).

Fiel

d pe

rpen

dicu

lar

Page 31: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 31 of Lecture II

Critical Surface of HighTemperature Superconductors (HTS)

HTS (this example, BSCCO2212) can operate at a temperature much higher than ~4 Krequired for conventional LTS; say 20K (or even more).

Fiel

d pa

ralle

l cas

e is

bet

ter (

low

er d

rop

in J

c)C

.M. F

riend

et a

l., P

hysi

ca C

(199

6)

Page 32: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 32 of Lecture II

Popular HTS Materials of Today

•BSCCO 2223 (Bi,Pb)2Sr2Ca2Cu3Ox

•BSCCO 2212•YBCCO

•MgB2 is technically a low temperature superconductor (LTS) withcritical temperature ~39 K.

Of these only BSCCO2212 and BSCCO2223 are now available insufficient quantity to make accelerator magnets.

Page 33: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 33 of Lecture II

Applied Field, T

Univers ity of Wis co ns in-Madis o nApplied S uperco nductivity CenterUnivers ity of Wis co ns in-Madis o nApplied S uperco nductivity Center

De ce mbe r 12th 2002 - Compiled by Pe te r J. Lee - jcprog_02bl.ppt, jcprog_02.xlsDe ce mbe r 12th 2002 - Compiled by Pe te r J. Lee - jcprog_02bl.ppt, jcprog_02.xlsSuperconductor Critical CurrentsSuperconductor Critical CurrentsLegend on next s lide

Crit

ical

Cur

rent

Den

sity

, A/m

10

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30Applied Field, T

YBCO75 K H||a-b

YBCO75 K H||c

Nb3Al RQHT+Cu

Nb3SnITER

Nb-Ti APC

2223Tape B|_

At 4.2 K UnlessOtherwise Stated

1.8 KNb-Ti-Ta

PbSnMo6S8

1.8 KNb-Ti

Nb3Sn Tapefrom (Nb,Ta) 6Sn5

2212 Round wire

YBCOµbridge H||c

MgB2Film Nb3Sn

1.8 K Bronze

Nb-Ti HT

Nb3Sn Internal Sn

Nb3AlITER

2223Tape B||

2212 Tape

Nb-Ti Multilayer

J c,

A/m

m2

Some Remarkable Properties of HTS(High Temperature Superconductors)

Also compare the highfield performance of“High TemperatureSuperconductors (HTS)”as compared to that of“Low TemperatureSuperconductors (LTS)”.

R vs. T

ASC

HTS retainsuperconductivity tohigher temperature

HTS

Page 34: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 34 of Lecture II

High Field Superconductors

Differences between Low field and high field superconductors:

Low field superconductors (NbTi) are ductile.The coils can be wound without significantly damaging the conductors.

High field superconductors (Nb3Sn and HTS) are brittle!

One has to be very careful in winding coil with these brittle materialor use alternate design to minimize the damage on conductors.

One can also wind the coil before they become brittle (& superconducting) andreact the material after winding to make them superconductor.This is referred to as “Wind and React” technique and it requires everything in thecoil to go through the high temperature (650 C or more) reaction process. One hasto be careful in choosing material, etc.

Page 35: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 35 of Lecture II

Usable Current Densities in Coils

Even though the superconductor may be capable ofcarrying a current density of 3000 A/mm2 or so, only afraction of that is available to power the magnet.

Here is why?• There should be enough copper within the wire to providestability against transient heat loads and to carry the currentin the event superconductor turns normal. Usually coppercontent is more than superconductor. In most NbTi mediumfield production magnets, the maximum current density incopper is 1000 A/mm2 or less at the design field. In high fieldNb3Sn R&D magnets, we are allowing it to be twice that.

• The trapezoidal “Rutherford cable” is made of several roundwire. The fill factor may be 90% or so.

• The coil is consisted of many turns. There must be a turn-to-turn insulation taking ~15% of the volume.

Jc Vs. B curve in NbTi

Page 36: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 36 of Lecture II

Usable Current Densities in Coils

The example on the right is for aNb3Sn superconducting cablewith Cu/Sc ratio fixed at 1.7.Note that overall current densityin the coil is only ¼ of thesuperconductor current density.

In the example on the right, theoverall current density iscomputed to keep currentdensity in copper at a givenvalue. 0.0

0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Jsc(kA/mm2)

Jove

rall(

kA/m

m2)

1.01.21.41.61.82.0

Joverall for various Jcu

Jcu=

010002000300040005000600070008000

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15B(T)

Jc, J

w, J

o (A

/mm

2) Jc (A/mm2)JwireJoverall

Page 37: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 37 of Lecture II

Usable Current Density in Magnet Design(A case study of Nb3Sn for fix Jcu at quench)

Jsc(12T,4.3K) Jcu(A/mm2)

2500 1500

Cu/Sc Ratio B(T) Jc(A/mm2) J wire (A/mm 2) Joverall6.30 5 9454 1295 9115.18 6 7766 1257 8854.29 7 6431 1216 8563.56 8 5347 1171 8252.96 9 4446 1122 7902.46 10 3689 1066 7512.03 11 3048 1005 7081.67 12 2500 938 6601.35 13 2031 863 6071.09 14 1631 781 5500.86 15 1289 693 488

Scaled from TWCA Insulated

y = -74.64x + 1824.1R2 = 0.9956

700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

1050

1100

10 11 12 13 14 15B(T)

Jove

rall

(A/m

m2 )

A Good "Linear Fit"

Critical Current Density in Superconductor: Jsc(at 4.3 K) Also Wire & Overall Current Densities Normalized for a Given Jcu

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

6000

6500

7000

7500

8000

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

B(T)

Jsc,

Jw

ire, J

over

all (

A/m

m2 )

Jsc

Jwire

Joverall

Assignment: Obtain Jwire and Joverall curves for magnet designs at various short sample fields.Assume the (Bc,Jc) relationship above and Jcu to be 1500 A/mm2 at quench.

Page 38: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 38 of Lecture II

A Guide to Choosing the MaximumField in Superconducting Magnets

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

2.4

2.8

3.2

3.6

4.0

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0Coil thickness(dipole),

coil thickness/coil radius [quadrupole]

Rel

ativ

e Fi

eld

(dip

), R

elat

ive

Gra

d (q

uad)

Dipole Field

Quadrupole Gradient

Dipole: B=-muo Jo/2 *tQuad: G=-muo jo/2 ln(1+t/a)t = coil thicknessa = coil radius

To get maximum field keep increasing coil thickness (within practical limit) till you reach themaximum field in the coil where magnet quenches

Page 39: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 39 of Lecture II

Quadrupole Gradient for various coilradius

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Coil thickness mm

Gra

dien

t (T/

m)

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

Dipole: B=-muo Jo/2 *tQuad: G=-muo Jo/2 ln(1+t/a)t = coil thicknessa = coil radius

Jo=700 A/mm2 at the given field.Need Jc ~ 2000 or more.

Not

e: L

egen

ds a

re c

oil r

adiu

s, n

ot a

pertu

reTh

e pl

ot s

cale

line

arly

with

Jo

(cur

rent

den

sity

in c

oil).

A re

ason

able

rang

e of

Jc

is 4

00-1

000

A/m

m2

Important number is pole-tip field = Gradient * coil radiusIn large aperture magnets, forces become large.

Page 40: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 40 of Lecture II

Assignment

Assume that a rectangular cable (Non-Keystone, Rutherford cable) ismade of 30 wires (strands). The diameter of each wire is 1 mm. Thewidth of the insulated cable is 17 mm and thickness is 2 mm. Theinsulation on each side of the cable is 0.2 mm. The critical currentdensity of superconductor at 12 T is 2500 A/mm2. The wire has 40 %superconductor and you can assume that the rest is copper.

The magnet made with this cable operates at 12 T. Compute thecurrent density in wire, in insulated cable and bare cable (cablewithout insulation) at 12 T. What will be the current density in copperif the magnet quenches (looses its superconductivity) at 12 T?

Page 41: Lecture II Superconductivity · USPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 26 of Lecture II Ramesh Gupta, BNL Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2 K and 1.8 K

SuperconductingMagnet Division

Ramesh Gupta, BNLUSPAS Course on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets, June 23-27, 2003 Slide No. 41 of Lecture II

Why Use SuperconductingMagnets in Accelerators?

Use of superconductors in accelerator magnets generate field much higherthan what can be achieved from the normal conductors.

Two major reasons for using superconductingmagnets in the accelerators: Cost advantage

In high energy circular hadron colliders, thesuperconducting magnets reduce the size ofa machine. This usually translate in to areduction in the overall machine cost.Superconducting magnets also lower thepower consumption and hence the cost ofoperating a high energy machine.

Performance advantageIn interaction regions, a few high field andhigh field quality magnets may significantlyenhance the luminosity of the machine. Inthis case magnet costs may be large but theoverall returns to experimentalists are high.

Courtesy: Martin Wilson