lectures 8 & 9: purchasing power parity (ppp) empirical tests of ppp motivating questions: how...
TRANSCRIPT
LECTURES 8 & 9: PURCHASING POWER PARITY (PPP)
EMPIRICAL TESTS OF PPP
Motivating questions:
How integrated are goods markets internationally?
How rapidly do prices adjust?
ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel
PPP: ALTERNATIVE DEFINTIONS
Absolute PPP : P ≡ price of a basket of goods in domestic currency
esp. from the World Bank’s International Comparison Program.
• RER = 1, where real exchange rate RER ≡ E
• P = E P*• E =
• In logs: e = p - p*.=
Prof. Jeffrey Frankel, Harvard Kennedy School
PPP: ALTERNATIVE DEFINTIONS (continued)
Relative PPP CPI ≡ is a price index, expressed relative to an arbitrary base year
e.g., “CPI2000 ≡ 100.0” (from national agencies).
Define real exchange rate Q ≡ E .• Q is constant (at ),
• CPI (E)(CPI*) . • In logs, Δe = Δ cpi – Δ cpi* (relative to some base year).
• Annual depreciation = π - π* .
or E =
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
PPP: EMPIRICAL QUESTIONS
• Does PPP hold: in the short run? in the long run?
• What is the estimated speed of adjustment to the LR?
• What is the test’s “statistical power”?
• Are PPP deviations: • related to variation in nominal exchange rates?
- Can one infer causality?- Is Var (q) related to currency regimes?
• related to geography?- To distance? To borders?
• Does the Law of One Price hold better in some sectors than others?- Commodities vs. Manufactures & Services- Tradables vs. Nontradables- Imports. (Is there full pass-through?)
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
PPP in a sense holds well in hyperinflations:
The cumulative change in E corresponds to the cumulative change in CPI.
SPECIFICATION OF PPP TEST :the real exchange rate as an autoregressive process
(random walk, or unit root)
(full adjustment to PPP)
(gradual adjustment to PPP).
Common finding in tests of 1980s: can’t reject H0 .
True problem: Insufficient power in the tests, due to insufficient data.Since 1990, studies have sought more data.
AltH
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
ttt uqkq 11:0 H
1H 0: 10:
where ut ≡ random disturbance with E(ut) = 0.
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
With 100 or 200 years of datait is not hard to reject a random walk, i.e., to detect regression to the mean.
qt
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
Studies with long time series:
Time Period
Estmt.δ
Speed of Adjustment
Half-life(years)
JF (1990) 1869-1987 .84 .16 4
Updated WTP (2007) 1791-2005 .88 .12(s.e.=.05)
4
Lothian & M. Taylor (1996) 2 centuries 3-5
Alan Taylor (2002)19 currencies 1870-1996 .79 .21
(s.e.=.01)3.4 – 4.1
Pappell & Prodan (2005) 1870-1998 1-2
Cross-country Number of panel data studies: countries
Frankel & Rose (1995) 150 4Wei & Parsley (1998) 14 4-5Choi, Mark & Sul (2004) 21 5.5
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
Taylor spliced together 100+ years of data for 20 currencies: 1870-1996
One lesson:reversionto LR Q
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
Three useful kinds of empirical evidence:
• The pattern of movement in real exchange rates:• band or threshold• Random Walk• trend• AR .
• Effects of exchange rate regime on variability in Q.
• Tests of Law of One Price for narrowly defined goods.
PPP clearly fails in the short run.
What is HAlt? Sticky prices? How can we tell?
Four patterns ofdeviation from PPP
and their likely origins:
a) Band <= barriers to trade
b) Random walk <= shifts in terms of trade
c) Trend <= Balassa-Samuelson effect
d) Autoregression <= sticky prices.
Band Random Walk
Trend Autoregression
Q
Q ≡
Q ≡
Q ≡
Q ≡
Q ≡
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
Var(et) and Var (qt) are correlated.
Is it coincidence? No, it can’t be: Every time a regime switch raises variability of nominal exchange rates, it also raises variability of real exchange rates.
· Pre- and post-1973 (Fig. 19.4)
· Inter-war period (Eichengreen, 1988): 1922-26 float vs. 1927-31 fix
· Post-war regimes (Mussa, 1986): - Canadian float in the 1950s - Ireland regime changes (see appendix table)
· A century of PPP (A.Taylor, 2002): 1870-1914 Gold standard 1914-45 Interwar 1946-71 Bretton Woods 1971-96 Float
When nominal exchange rate
variability (¥/$) went upwith floating,
real exchange rate variability
went upin tandem.
Coincidence?
Figure 19.4
Nominal & real exchange rates both became more volatile after 1973.
Monthly Changes in Real Japanese Yen /Dollar Rate
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
percent change
Monthly Changes in Nominal Japanese Yen /Dollar Rate
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
percent change
1973
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
The final nail in the coffin:Exchange rate variability across a century of regimes
Prof. Jeffrey Frankel
Variability of real exchange rate
Variability of nominal exchange rate
Again, each time a more flexible regime raises nominal variability, it raises real variability too.
1870-1996
Each observation is a country-regime. (Adapted from A.Taylor, 2002)
Mussa (1986):
Each time Ireland changed its exchange rate arrangements (₤, $, DM), bilateral realexchange rate variability has followed bilateral nominal exchange rate variability.
API120 - Prof. J.Frankel
Appendix: Another comparison of regimes
Looking ahead -- Lecture 9: FAILURES OF PURCHASING POWER PARITY (PPP)
Tests of the Law of One PriceNTGsCommoditiesManufacturesBig Mac hamburgersImports
Barriers to International Integration Transportation costs Tariffs & non-tariff trade barriers Border frictions Currencies
Non-Traded Goods -- The Balassa-Samuelson Effect