legal & ethical issues questions to ask. libel every article starts with a piece of information
TRANSCRIPT
Legal & Ethical IssuesLegal & Ethical Issues
Questions to AskQuestions to Ask
LibelLibel
• Every article starts with a piece of information.
• Every article starts with a piece of information.
Question 1Question 1
• Is it true?• Is it true?
Question 1Question 1
• Is it true?• If yes--you’re home free.TRUTH IS
AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE IN A LIBEL CASE.
• Is it true?• If yes--you’re home free.TRUTH IS
AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE IN A LIBEL CASE.
Question 1Question 1
• Is it true?• If yes--you’re home free.TRUTH IS
AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE IN A LIBEL CASE.
• But what if you’re not sure?
• Is it true?• If yes--you’re home free.TRUTH IS
AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE IN A LIBEL CASE.
• But what if you’re not sure?
Question 2Question 2
• Can it be proven, one way or another?
• Can it be proven, one way or another?
Question 2Question 2
• Can it be proven, one way or another?
• If it CANNOT be proven, then it’s not a fact.
• Can it be proven, one way or another?
• If it CANNOT be proven, then it’s not a fact.
Question 2Question 2
• Can it be proven, one way or another?
• If it CANNOT be proven, then it’s not a fact.
• It’s an opinion.
• Can it be proven, one way or another?
• If it CANNOT be proven, then it’s not a fact.
• It’s an opinion.
Question 2Question 2
• Can it be proven, one way or another?
• If it CANNOT be proven, then it’s not a fact.
• It’s an opinion.• OPINION IS PROTECTED SPEECH.
• Can it be proven, one way or another?
• If it CANNOT be proven, then it’s not a fact.
• It’s an opinion.• OPINION IS PROTECTED SPEECH.
Question 3Question 3
• If you are still not sure, • If you are still not sure,
Question 3Question 3
• If you are still not sure,• Ask: “Who would be affected?”
• If you are still not sure,• Ask: “Who would be affected?”
Is it a public official?Is it a public official?
Is it a public official?Is it a public official?
• A public official is a person who is appointed or elected to a high public office and has significant responsibility.
• A public official is a person who is appointed or elected to a high public office and has significant responsibility.
Is it a public official?Is it a public official?
• A public official is a person who is appointed or elected to a high public office and has significant responsibility.
• Examples: president, senator, mayor, chancellor, chief of police.
• A public official is a person who is appointed or elected to a high public office and has significant responsibility.
• Examples: president, senator, mayor, chancellor, chief of police.
Is it a public official?Is it a public official?
• A public official must show “actual malice” on the part of the journalist.
• A public official must show “actual malice” on the part of the journalist.
Is it a public official?Is it a public official?
• A public official must show “actual malice” on the part of the journalist.
• “Reckless disregard for the truth.”
• A public official must show “actual malice” on the part of the journalist.
• “Reckless disregard for the truth.”
Is it a public official?Is it a public official?
• A public official must show “actual malice” on the part of the journalist.
• “Reckless disregard for the truth.”• “Knew or should have known that
story was false.”
• A public official must show “actual malice” on the part of the journalist.
• “Reckless disregard for the truth.”• “Knew or should have known that
story was false.”
Is it a public figure?Is it a public figure?
Is it a public figure?Is it a public figure?
• Examples: movie stars, athletes, musicians, witnesses.
• Examples: movie stars, athletes, musicians, witnesses.
Is it a public figure?Is it a public figure?
• Examples: movie stars, athletes, musicians, witnesses.
• Could be voluntary or involuntary.
• Examples: movie stars, athletes, musicians, witnesses.
• Could be voluntary or involuntary.
Is it a public figure?Is it a public figure?
• Examples: movie stars, athletes, musicians, witnesses.
• Could be voluntary or involuntary.• Current law doesn’t make a
distinction, but this could change.
• Examples: movie stars, athletes, musicians, witnesses.
• Could be voluntary or involuntary.• Current law doesn’t make a
distinction, but this could change.
Is it a private citizen?Is it a private citizen?
Is it a private citizen?Is it a private citizen?
• Be careful. • Be careful.
Is it a private citizen?Is it a private citizen?
• Be careful.• In some states, simple negligence
is enough.
• Be careful.• In some states, simple negligence
is enough.
Is it a private citizen?Is it a private citizen?
• Be careful.• In some states, simple negligence
is enough. • But there are three privileged
forums where it doesn’t matter.
• Be careful.• In some states, simple negligence
is enough. • But there are three privileged
forums where it doesn’t matter.
Was it in an official report?Was it in an official report?
Was it in an official report?Was it in an official report?
• Best example: police report.• Best example: police report.
Was it in an official report?Was it in an official report?
• Best example: police report.• Government employees are
protected by sovereign immunity.
• Best example: police report.• Government employees are
protected by sovereign immunity.
Was it in an official report?Was it in an official report?
• Best example: police report.• Government employees are
protected by sovereign immunity.• Journalists have qualified
privilege--as long as they are accurate.
• Best example: police report.• Government employees are
protected by sovereign immunity.• Journalists have qualified
privilege--as long as they are accurate.
Was it in an official report?Was it in an official report?
• Best example: police report.• Government employees are
protected by sovereign immunity.• Journalists have qualified
privilege--as long as they are accurate.
• Attribution, attribution, attribution.
• Best example: police report.• Government employees are
protected by sovereign immunity.• Journalists have qualified
privilege--as long as they are accurate.
• Attribution, attribution, attribution.
Was it in a court filing?Was it in a court filing?
Was it in a court filing?Was it in a court filing?
• Must be filed in the court.• Must be filed in the court.
Was it in a court filing?Was it in a court filing?
• Must be filed in the court.• Must be legally obtained.
• Must be filed in the court.• Must be legally obtained.
Was it in a court filing?Was it in a court filing?
• Must be filed in the court.• Must be legally obtained.• Attribution, attribution, attribution.
• Must be filed in the court.• Must be legally obtained.• Attribution, attribution, attribution.
Was it in a legislative setting?
Was it in a legislative setting?
Was it in a legislative setting?
Was it in a legislative setting?
• Spoken as part of official debate.• Spoken as part of official debate.
Was it in a legislative setting?
Was it in a legislative setting?
• Spoken as part of official debate.• Not on campaign trail.
• Spoken as part of official debate.• Not on campaign trail.
Invasion of privacyInvasion of privacy
Invasion of privacyInvasion of privacy
• Is the information private?• Is the information private?
Invasion of privacyInvasion of privacy
• Is the information private?• Would disclosure be highly
offensive to reasonable person?
• Is the information private?• Would disclosure be highly
offensive to reasonable person?
Invasion of privacyInvasion of privacy
• Is the information private?• Would disclosure be highly
offensive to reasonable person?• Is the matter newsworthy?
• Is the information private?• Would disclosure be highly
offensive to reasonable person?• Is the matter newsworthy?
Invasion of privacyInvasion of privacy
• How old is your source?• How old is your source?
Invasion of privacyInvasion of privacy
• How old is your source?• A minor cannot give up privacy
rights.
• How old is your source?• A minor cannot give up privacy
rights.
Invasion of privacyInvasion of privacy
• How old is your source?• A minor cannot give up privacy
rights.• Minors are often, but not always,
protected by confidential court proceedings.
• How old is your source?• A minor cannot give up privacy
rights.• Minors are often, but not always,
protected by confidential court proceedings.
False lightFalse light
False lightFalse light
• Emerging area of concern.• Emerging area of concern.
False lightFalse light
• Emerging area of concern.• Cross between libel and invasion of
privacy.
• Emerging area of concern.• Cross between libel and invasion of
privacy.
False lightFalse light
• Emerging area of concern.• Cross between libel and invasion of
privacy.• “True facts” presented in a way
that creates a false impression.
• Emerging area of concern.• Cross between libel and invasion of
privacy.• “True facts” presented in a way
that creates a false impression.
False lightFalse light
• Emerging area of concern.• Cross between libel and invasion of
privacy.• “True facts” presented in a way
that creates a false impression.• Executive “who was charged with
killing his wife.”
• Emerging area of concern.• Cross between libel and invasion of
privacy.• “True facts” presented in a way
that creates a false impression.• Executive “who was charged with
killing his wife.”
Common lawCommon law
Common lawCommon law
• Not in statute.• Not in statute.
Common lawCommon law
• Not in statute.• Decided on case by case basis by
judges applying precedent to new facts.
• Not in statute.• Decided on case by case basis by
judges applying precedent to new facts.
Common lawCommon law
• Not in statute.• Decided on case by case basis by
judges applying precedent to new facts.
• Constantly in flux.
• Not in statute.• Decided on case by case basis by
judges applying precedent to new facts.
• Constantly in flux.
Ethical questionsEthical questions
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• What are the alternatives?
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Print nothing.
• What are the alternatives?• Print nothing.
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Print nothing.• Print everything you know.
• What are the alternatives?• Print nothing.• Print everything you know.
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Print nothing.• Print everything you know.• Print selectively.
• What are the alternatives?• Print nothing.• Print everything you know.• Print selectively.
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.• Advertisers.
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.• Advertisers.
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.• Advertisers.• Already injured parties.
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.• Advertisers.• Already injured parties.
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.• Advertisers.• Already injured parties.• Innocent parties.
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.• Advertisers.• Already injured parties.• Innocent parties.
Ethical questionsEthical questions
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.• Advertisers.• Already injured parties.• Innocent parties.• Your publication/the profession.
• What are the alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?• Readers/citizens/consumers.• Advertisers.• Already injured parties.• Innocent parties.• Your publication/the profession.
Case studyCase study
Case studyCase study
• High school volleyball player is kicked off team after discovery that she has falsified her home address so that she can play for a particular school’s team.
• High school volleyball player is kicked off team after discovery that she has falsified her home address so that she can play for a particular school’s team.
Case studyCase study
• High school volleyball player is kicked off team after discovery that she has falsified her home address so that she can play for a particular school’s team.
• How much detail should you provide?
• High school volleyball player is kicked off team after discovery that she has falsified her home address so that she can play for a particular school’s team.
• How much detail should you provide?
Case studyCase study
• What are your alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?
• What are your alternatives?• Who benefits from your decision?
CopyrightCopyright
CopyrightCopyright
• Why you should care• Why you should care
CopyrightCopyright
• Why you should care• Current penalty: $150,000 per
infringement
• Why you should care• Current penalty: $150,000 per
infringement
CopyrightCopyright
• Why you should care• Current penalty: $150,000 per
infringement• Up to 10 years in jail
• Why you should care• Current penalty: $150,000 per
infringement• Up to 10 years in jail
CopyrightCopyright
Why you should careCurrent penalty: $150,000 per
infringementUp to 10 years in jailWhat it means
Why you should careCurrent penalty: $150,000 per
infringementUp to 10 years in jailWhat it means
CopyrightCopyright• What Is Copyright • Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United States (
title 17, U. S. Code) to the authors of “original works of authorship,” including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and certain other intellectual works. This protection is available to both published and unpublished works. Section 106 of the 1976 Copyright Act generally gives the owner of copyright the exclusive right to do and to authorize others to do the following:
• To reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords;• To prepare derivative works based upon the work; • To distribute copies or phonorecords of the work to the public by sale or other
transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; • To perform the work publicly, in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and
choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
• To display the work publicly, in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work; and
• In the case of sound recordings, to perform the work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.
• What Is Copyright • Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United States (
title 17, U. S. Code) to the authors of “original works of authorship,” including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and certain other intellectual works. This protection is available to both published and unpublished works. Section 106 of the 1976 Copyright Act generally gives the owner of copyright the exclusive right to do and to authorize others to do the following:
• To reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords;• To prepare derivative works based upon the work; • To distribute copies or phonorecords of the work to the public by sale or other
transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; • To perform the work publicly, in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and
choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
• To display the work publicly, in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work; and
• In the case of sound recordings, to perform the work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.
A copyright exampleA copyright example
Doug MichelsDoug Michels• Self-described “media
whore”• Yale trained architect• Founding member of
Ant Farm art collective• In early 1990s said he
was earning $30,000 to $40,000 a year from copyright infringements of “Cadillac Ranch”
• Self-described “media whore”
• Yale trained architect• Founding member of
Ant Farm art collective• In early 1990s said he
was earning $30,000 to $40,000 a year from copyright infringements of “Cadillac Ranch”
Fair useFair use
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered “fair,” such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered “fair,” such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
Fair useFair use
• the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
• the nature of the copyrighted work;• amount and substantiality of the portion used
in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
• the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
• the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
• the nature of the copyrighted work;• amount and substantiality of the portion used
in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
• the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Fair useFair use
The distinction between “fair use” and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.
The distinction between “fair use” and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.