legislative overrulings chart

8/12/2019 Legislative Overrulings Chart

1/6

Case Citation Date Statutory Cite Date

Gerhardt v. Industrial 1994 A.R.S. section 2008Commission of Arizona, 181 23-1061Ariz. 215, 889 P.2d 8

Arizona Department of 1993 A.R.S. section 2009Public Safety v. Industrial 23-1044Commission of Arizona

Irvin v. State, 301 Ark. 416, 1994 A.C.A. subtit. 6, ch. 1995784 S.W.2d 763 73, subch. 1

Yedrysek v. State, 293 Ark. 1987 A.C.A. subtit. 4 1995541, 739 S.W. 2d 672

Decker v. U.D. Registry, Inc., 2003 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 2005105 Cal. App. 4th 1382 section 425.16

Fair Political Practices Com- 2004 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 2005mission v. American Civil section 425.16Rights Coalition, 121 Cal. App.4th 1171

Contreras v. America, 1975 Cal. Ins. Code 1976Compania General de section 11580.1Seguros, S.A., 48 Cal. App.3d 270

Camp Meeker Water System 1990 Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1998v. Public Utilities Commision, section 31151 Cal. 3d 845

Camp Meeker, supra 1990 Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1998section 331.5

Camp Meeker, supra 1990 Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1998div. 1, pt. 1, ch. 9,art. 1


2/6

Camp Meeker, supra 1990 Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1998div. 1, pt. 1, ch. 9,art. 3

City of Los Angeles v. County 1983 Cal. Rev. & Tax Code 1989of Los Angeles, 139 Cal. App. section 93

3d 999

Utah Power & Light Co. v. 1983 Idaho Code section 1984Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 61-502A105 Idaho 822

LeRay v. Bartholomew, 2004 La. R.S. 40:1299.42 200803-1370 (La. App. 5th Cir.), 871

So.2d 492

Guzzetta v. Texas Pipe Line, 1986 La. C.C. art. 493 200385-C-2258 (La.), 485 So.2d

508

Melerine v. State, 2000-0162 2000 La. C.C. art. 493 2003(La. App. 4 Cir.), 773 So.2d

831

Anderson v. State of 2002 La. C.C. art. 493 2003Louisiana Natural ResourcesDepartment, 2001-0296 (La.App. 4 Cir.), 826 So. 2d 1143

Commissioner of Revenue v. 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992Molesworth, 408 Mass. 580 62B, section 14

Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 199262C, section 28





3/6

Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 199262C, section 36A




Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 199263B, section 3

Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992

65, section 27

Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 199265, section 29

Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 199265A, section 6

In re Estate of McCutcheon, 1997 20 Pa. C.S. section 2002699 A.2d 746 (Pa. Super.) 6205

Puget Sound National Bank 1994 Rev. Code Wash. 2010v. Department of Revenue, section 82.08.037123 Wn.2d 284


4/6

Language Source of Language

"are to only directly overrule Laws 2008, ch. 169, section 2the court decision in Gerhardt

"the amendments . . . are to Laws 2009, ch. 184, section 7overrule the court decision in. . . to the extent that"

"It is the intent of the Act to Acts 1995, No. 595, section 5legislatively overrule Irvin v.State

"By these amendments, the Acts 1995, No. 1294, section 3General Assembly of the Stateof Arkansas overrules"

"It is the intent of the Stats 2005 ch 535legislature . . . to overrule thedecisions"

"It is the intent of the Stats 2005 ch 535legislature . . . to overrule thedecisions"

"it is the intent of the Stats 1976 ch 1145Legislature in enacting thisAct to reverse the effect ofthe Contreras case"

"It is the intent of the Stats 1998 ch 886Legislature to, among otherthings, overrule . . . as itpertains only to decisionsaffecting the energy,transportation, and

communications industries"

See above Stats 1998 ch 886



5/6


"it is the intent of the Stats 1989 ch 1230Legislature in enacting this

act to nullify the holding . . .in City of Los Angeles . . . ."

"hereby declared to be S.L. 1984, ch 21,legislative intent that section 2this act should overrulethat portion of . . . whichauthorized . . . ."

"The provisions . . . are Acts 2008, No. 558,intended . . . to legislatively section 2

overrule the . . . decisionin LeRay . . . ."

"the enactment . . . was to House Concurrentoverrule certain judicial Resolution No.decisions" 306 (2004)

See above House ConcurrentResolution No.306 (2004)

See above House ConcurrentResolution No.306 (2004)

"Molesworth . . . is Dep't of Rev. TIRsuperseded by legislation" 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6


6/6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

See above TIR 92-6

"This change is intended Joint State Gov'texplicitly to overrule the Committee Notes

result in McCutcheon"

"The legislature intends . . . 2010 1ST SP.S. C 23to supersede the holding" sections 1502 & 1503

legislative overrulings chart

Documents