lessons from haiti: innovation in tracking and housing ......average n of children

Brookings InstitutionWashington, 13th December 2012

IOM Haiti Mission

Lessons from Haiti: Innovation in Lessons from Haiti: Innovation in Tracking and Housing Internally Tracking and Housing Internally

Displaced PersonsDisplaced Persons

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25

1


2

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX (DTM)

Two complementary data gathering processes to determine the number of displaced; camps and IDP population profile.

Both started in February 2010 and are still in use to track and monitor the displacement.

CAMP BASED ASSESSMENT

REGISTRATION: Detailed IDP

Profiling

How many? Where?

Who?

Results


3

How many & where?

By July 2010: 1,5 million estimated in 1,555 IDP Sites (Camps)

How Many & Where? How Many & Where? Camp Based AssessmentCamp Based Assessment

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4Quarter

Phase 4

Phase 3

Phase 2

Phase 1

2010 2011 2012 2013

Emergency Registration

Updating of Existing Registry

Return and Referral

Individual Assistance and De-registration

Phases of displacement trackingPhases of displacement tracking

Registration

Camp Based Assessments


4

491,000516,000519,000551,000595,000

359,000369,000390,000420,000

1,500,000

1,370,000

1,069,000

* 810,000680,000 635,000

JUL '10 SEP '10 NOV '10 JAN '11 MAR '11 MAY '11 JUL '11 SEP '11 NOV '11 JAN '12 FEB '12 APR '12 JUN '12 AUG '12 NOV '12

660707758802

894

498541575602

1,555

1,356

1,1991,152

1,061 1,001

IDP SitesIDP Sites

Trends in IDP Sites and populationTrends in IDP Sites and population

Spontaneous return Organized return & camp closure

IDP populationIDP population

JUL '10 SEP '10 NOV '10 JAN '11 MAR '11 MAY '11 JUL '11 SEP '11 NOV '11 JAN '12 FEB '12 APR '12 JUN '12 AUG '12 NOV '12

Timeline of post earthquake displacement in IDP sitesTimeline of post earthquake displacement in IDP sites

• PH1 = 83% from Port au Prince & 17% from outside• PH1 = 85% from the same commune & 73% from the same

section communale • PH2 2012= 63% from the same commune and 57% from

the same section communale

IDP population IDP population Phase 1 Phase 2Phase 1 Phase 2

167,824 IDPs52% F 48% M

44,205 HH(12% PH1)

252 SITES8 communes

1273 SITES 13 communes

321,235 HH(47% CENSUS)

1,360,319 IDPs53% F 47% M


5

Age and sex structure (1)Age and sex structure (1)

‐10.0 ‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

0-4

10-14

20-24

30-34

40-44

50-54

60-64M ale R2 2012Female R2 2012M ale C PAPFemale C PAP

‐10.0 ‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

0-4

10-14

20-24

30-34

40-44

50-54

60-64Female R1Females Census EQAAM ale R1M ales Census EQAA

‐10.0 ‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

0-4

10-14

20-24

30-34

40-44

50-54

60-64M ale R1Female R1M ale R2 allFemale R2 all

‐10.0 ‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

0-4

10-14

20-24

30-34

40-44

50-54


‐10.0 ‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

0-4

10-14

20-24

30-34

40-44

50-54


‐10.0 ‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

0-4

10-14

20-24

30-34

40-44

50-54

60-64Female R1Females Census EQAAM ale R1M ales Census EQAA

‐10.0 ‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

0-4

10-14

20-24

30-34

40-44

50-54


‐10.0 ‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

0-4

10-14

20-24

30-34

40-44

50-54


Average age IDPs 24 23 & 24 in 2010 2011 and 2012

Average age HoH 38 37 & 36 in 2010 2011 and 2012

Dependency Ratio 49 in 2010 & 43 in 2012

Sex Ratio 87 93 & 94 in 2010 2011 and 2012

Single male headed HH, from 16% to 23% in 2012

Who heads the household?Who heads the household?

2010 2011 2012Couple headed HH 1.6 1.5 1.4Female headed HH 1.1 1.1 1.0Male headed HH 0.8 0.6 0.4

Who heads the HouseholdAverage N <15 yrs per HH

2010 2011 2012Couple headed HH 4.6 4.3 4.0

Female headed HH 4.0 3.8 3.3Male headed HH 3.6 3.2 2.6

Average HH sizeWho heads the Household

Average HH size from 4.2 to 3.4 in 2012

Average N of children <15 yrs per HH from 1.3 to 1 in 2012


6

EducationEducation

% Males

8.0

55.8

36.2

% Females

12.3

53.3

34.5

Drop out

Not in school

In school

NER = 45.2NER drops from 83 in Primary to 23 in Junior Secondary and to 15 in Senior SecondaryDHS 2012 79 Primary NER in camps

8% Males & 12% Females

56% Male & 53% Females

Occupation Occupation

66% Unemployment rate

Each working IDP supports 2.3

non working IDPs

Females 24.6

18.5

56.8

UnemployedNot in the workforceEmployed

Males 50.9

19.0

30.1

54% unskilled workforce and informal occupation

28% skilled workforce (artisans / crafts and skilled manual workers)

4% Drivers and machine operators & technicians (non manual workers)


7

Ownership statusOwnership status

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%Tenants 2010 Tenants 2012

% of tenants from 64% to 86%

Owners who can repair from 20% to 6%

Summary findingsSummary findings

• Over time older IDPs and children returned home and camps now show a population of young adults and increasing age of the head of households

• The ratio of females is decreasing• The size of household is decreasing• Most IDPs own identification documents, fewer in 2012

than in 2010• Primary NER is similar to the value in the neighborhood• Unemployment and unskilled labor are predominant • Most owners, especially those who could repair their

homes, left and the proportion of tenants is increasing


8

Returned = 11,736 Still in camps = 61

Targeted = 11,797

Phase 3: Return and Referral IOM projects 2011/12Phase 3: Return and Referral IOM projects 2011/12

Phase 3: Return and Referral IOM & partners (*) in 2012Phase 3: Return and Referral IOM & partners (*) in 2012

62.0% 17.3%

20.7%

Done / in processPlannedGap

(*) JP/HRO – IFRC – Concern WW- CRS – WVI – ACTED-CARE- GOAL - HELPAGE - MOFKA


9

Methods, technology & innovation

DTM Methodology DTM Methodology –– Data Collection InstrumentsData Collection Instruments

(*) JP/HRO – IFRC - ???????

Registration FormHousehold & Individuals

details IDP Site Assessment Form

Household Registration CardSN

Database (SQL)


10

DTM Methodology DTM Methodology –– GIS & MappingGIS & MappingPoints and polygons of the IDP Sites

Street network

Neighborhoods of Port au Price IOM GIS Unit data sources

-Field surveyors-Satellite imagery-Cooperation with open source community-National Center for geospatial information

DTM Methodology DTM Methodology –– GIS & Mapping GIS & Mapping –– Aerial photo 1Aerial photo 1


11

DTM Methodology DTM Methodology –– GIS & Mapping GIS & Mapping –– Aerial photo 2Aerial photo 2

Establish table in SQL Server and connection for Web Service in web server

Establish table in SQL Server and connection for Web Service in web server

Generate questionnaire form and convert it to Blackberry Application.

Generate questionnaire form and convert it to Blackberry Application.

Text, number,Image Data

Text, number,Image Data

GPS information

GPS information

Data Collection

Data Collection

INTERNET(Encrypted Data)

Retrieving and Sending Data(Synchronize with server)

Retrieving and Sending Data(Synchronize with server)

Data Processing for output/reporting

Data Processing for output/reporting

DTM Methodology DTM Methodology –– Registering Returnees from camp and Registering Returnees from camp and follow up (Blackberry & android application)follow up (Blackberry & android application)


12

Thank youThank youCamera for aerial photo IOM DTM team in Haiti


13

lessons from haiti: innovation in tracking and housing ......average n of children

Documents