letter to albert richard

7/29/2019 Letter to Albert Richard

1/4

Mikhail Bakunin 1870

Letter to Albert Richard

Written: August 1870;

Source: Bakunin on Anarchy, translated and edited by Sam Dolgoff, 1971.

The ill-fated uprising in Lyons of September 5, 1870, led by Bakunin, Richard, and other members of the

secret vanguard organization the Alliance, occurred shortly before the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian

War (July 19, 1870-January 28, 1871).

The Letter to Albert Richard, written shortly before the Lyons uprising, is important primarily because

it deals with the crucial question of the relationship between the revolutionary minority and the masses.

It is also relevant because of relevance to the development of the Russian Revolution and because it

sums up Bakunins alternative to what he saw as authoritarian revolutions.

Albert Richard (1846-1925) was a French anarchist from Lyons, where he was an active member of the

Alliance and a pioneer organizer of the International. Bakunin accused him of betraying the Lyons

uprising by collaborating with the provisional government. After the fall of the Paris Commune of May

1871 in which he fought, Richard wrote a pamphlet urging the restoration of Napoleon III.

Whether Bakunins concept of invisible collective dictatorship contradicts his libertarian principles is a

matter of controversy. His early non-anarchist writings favored a Blanquist-type dictatorship, but his

mature anarchist writings are clearly opposed to Blanquist vanguardism. G. D. H. Cole stressed:

Bakunin agreed with Marx in advocating a dictatorship of the proletariat over the exploiting classes;

but he held that this dictatorship must be a spontaneous dictatorship of the entire uprisen working

class, and not by any body of leaders set in authority over them.

Bakunins well-known predilection for the establishment of tightly organized secret hierarchical

organizations, for which he worked out elaborate statutes in the style of the Freemasons and the

Carbonari, can be attributed partly to his romantic temperament and partly to the fact that all


2/4

revolutionary and progressive groups were forced to operate secretly. Bakunins secret organizations

were actually quite informal fraternities of loosely organized individuals and groups connected by

personal contact and correspondence, as preferred by his closest associates who considered his

schemes for elaborate, centralized secret societies incompatible with libertarian principles.

You keep on telling me that we both agree on fundamental points. Alas! my friend, I am very much

afraid that we find ourselves in absolute disagreement... . I must, more than ever, consider you as a

believer in centralization, and in the revolutionary State, while 1 am more than ever opposed to it, and

have faith only in revolutionary anarchy, which will everywhere be accompanied by an invisible

collective power, the only dictatorship I will accept, because it alone is compatible with the aspirations

of the people and the full dynamic thrust of the revolutionary movement!

Your revolutionary strategy could be summed up as follows: as soon as the revolution breaks out in

Paris, Paris organizes the Provisional Revolutionary Commune. Lyons, Marseilles, Rouen, and other large

cities revolt at the same time, immediately send their revolutionary delegations to Paris, and set up a

sort of national assembly, or Peoples Committee of Public Safety for all of France. This committee

decrees the revolution for all of France. This committee decrees the revolution, the abolition of the old

state and social liquidation of all exploitative institutions, be they governmental, religious, or economic.

The committee also decrees, at the same time, the collectivization of property and the organization of a

new revolutionary state with dictatorial power in order to suppress internal and external reaction: Is this

not your idea?

Our idea, our plan is exactly the opposite there is no reason to assume that the revolutionary uprising

must necessarily begin in Paris. It may well begin in the provinces. But let us assume that the revolution,

as usual, begins in Paris. It is our conviction that Paris should then play only a negative role, i.e., initiate

the destruction of the old order, but not organize the new order (in the rest of France). If Paris itself

stages a successful uprising, it would then have the obligation and the right to call for solidarity in the


3/4

complete political, juridical, financial, and administrative liquidation of the State, and of political and

privately owned or controlled (but not strictly) personal property; the demolition of all the functions,

services, and powers of the State; the public burning of all public and private legal documents and

records. Paris will immediately and to the greatest possible extent organize itself in a revolutionary

manner. The newly formed workers associations would then take possession of all the tools of

production as well as all buildings and capital, arming and organizing themselves into regional sections

made up of groups based on streets and neighborhood boundaries. The federally organized sections

would then associate themselves to form a federated commune. And it will be the duty of the commune

to declare that it has neither the right nor the desire to organize or govern all of France. This commune,

on the contrary, will appeal to all the people, to all the communes, and to what up till now was

considered foreign territory, to follow its example, to make its own revolution in as radical a manner as

possible and to destroy the state, juridical institutions, privileged ownership, and so forth.

Paris will then invite these French or foreign communes to meet either in Paris or in some other place,

where their delegations will collectively work out the necessary arrangements to lay the groundwork for

equality, the indispensable precondition for all freedom. They will formulate an absolutely negative

program which will stress what must be abolished, organize the common defense and propaganda

against the enemies of the Revolution, and develop practical revolutionary solidarity with its friends in

all lands.

The constructive tasks of the Social Revolution, the creation of new forms of social life, can emerge only

from the living practical experience of the grass-roots organizations which will build the new society

according to their manifold needs and aspirations.

The provinces, at least such main centers as Lyons, Marseilles, Saint-tinne, Rouen, and others do not

have to wait for decrees from Paris before organizing the Revolution. They must revolt and, like Paris,

make the negative, i.e., the destructive phase of the Revolution. They must organize themselves

spontaneously, without outside interference, so that the Revolutionary Federal Assembly or Provincial

and Communal Delegations do not attempt to govern and regulate all of France; the Revolutionary


4/4

Assembly is, on the contrary, the creation of local and spontaneous organizations in each of the

revolutionary centers of France. In short, the Revolution emanating from all points should not, and must

not, depend on a single directing center. The center must not be the source, but the product; not the

cause, but the effect of the revolution.

There must be anarchy, there must be if the revolution is to become and remain alive, real, and

powerful the greatest possible awakening of all the local passions and aspirations; a tremendous

awakening of spontaneous life everywhere. After the initial revolutionary victory the political

revolutionaries, those advocates of brazen dictatorship, will try to squelch the popular passions. They

appeal for order, for trust in, for submission to those who, in the course and in the name of the

Revolution, seized and legalized their own dictatorial powers; this is how such political revolutionariesreconstitute the State. We, on the contrary, must awaken and foment all the dynamic passions of the

people. We must bring forth anarchy, and in the midst of the popular tempest, we must be the invisible

pilots guiding the Revolution, not by any kind of overt power but by the collective dictatorship of all our

allies [members of the anarchist vanguard organization International Alliance of Social Democracy], a

dictatorship without tricks, without official titles, without official rights, and therefore all the more

powerful, as it does not carry the trappings of power. This is the only dictatorship I will accept, but in

order to act, it must first be created, it must be prepared and organized in advance, for it will not come

into being by itself, neither by discussions, nor by theoretical disputations, nor by mass propaganda

meetings...

If you will build this collective and invisible power you will triumph; the well-directed revolution will

succeed. Otherwise, it will not! ! If you will play around with welfare committees, with official

dictatorship, then the reaction which you yourself have built will engulf you ... who are already talking

yourselves into becoming the Dantons, the Robespierres, and the Saint-Justs of revolutionary socialism,

and you are already preparing your beautiful speeches, your brilliant coups d'tats, which you will

suddenly foist on an astonished world...

Bakunin Archive | M.I.A.

letter to albert richard

Documents