letter: transmittal of technical memorandum no. 1 …
TRANSCRIPT
9601001.DOC/MI0028815-01
ABB EPA Region 5 Records
256077
January 2, 1996
Mr. Rob MacLeodEnvironmental Response DivisionMichigan Department of Environmental QualityKnapp Center300 S. Washington SquareLansing, MI 48909
Subject: Technical Memorandum No. I prepared by C.C. Johnson & Malhotra, P.C. (CCJM)Waste Management - Holland Lagoons/Oversight Assistance (MERA #700010)Contract Order No. Y-40207
Dear Rob:
Enclosed please find two copies, for your review, of Technical Memorandum No. 1 "Phase II RemedialInvestigation Activities," prepared by CCJM for the Waste Management - Holland Lagoons/OversightAssistance site. Also enclosed is the CD which we forgot to include with the last tech memo.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me or Brett Coulter of CCJM.
Sincerely,
ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Garret E. Bondy, P.Site Manager
GEB/kat
Enclosure
ABB Environmental Services of Michigan, Inc.
39255 Country Club Drive B-25Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331-3490
Telephone (810) 489-8040Fax (810) 489-8048
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 5
' ERD-SUPERFUNDPROJECT: Waste Management - Holland Lagoons/Oversight Assistance
SUBJECT: Data Validation - Soil and Groundwater Samples
PREPARED BY: Maria Crouch, ABB Environmental Services, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Technical Memorandum (TM) is to document the data validation activities
conducted by ABB Environmental Services, Inc. (ABB-ES) for soil and groundwater samples collected
at the Waste Management/Holland Lagoons site. The task was conducted under Contract No. ERD-9477
with the State of Michigan under the direction of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) Superfund Section. Background information on the project can be found in the Work Plan.
PROCEDURES
The data packages generated by ENCOTEC, Inc. for the water and soil samples collected during the field
program were reviewed using USEPA CLP National Functional Guidelines. Tables TM5-1 and TM5-2
present the analytical results as reported by the laboratory for soil and groundwater, respectively. Tables
TM5-3 and TM5-4 present the validated results with the appropriate data qualifiers for soil and
groundwater, respectively. The laboratory qualifiers used on Tables TM5-1 and TM5-2 are defined in
Attachment I; data validation qualifiers used on Tables TM5-3 and TM5-4 are defined in Attachment II.
For all analyses, sample results qualified with a "U" due to blank contamination were treated as positive
results when further qualification was needed (i.e., when validation action applied to positive results),
except in the case of field duplicate evaluation, which was done after blank evaluation, and where results
qualified with a "U" were considered non-detected. Organic compound results below the contract
required quantitation limit (CRQL) were flagged with a "J" by the laboratory on Tables TM5-1 and
TM5-2 . These results were considered estimated and flagged with a "J" on Tables TM5-3 and TM5-4.
Metals and cyanide results between the instrument detection limit (IDL) and the contract required
95IOCO2 DOOM1002/II15-OI TM5- 1
detection limit (CRDL) were flagged with a "B" by the laboratory on Tables TM5-1 and TMS-2. These
results were considered estimated and, if other qualifiers were not added to these results by a validation
action, flagged with a T* on Tables TM5-3 and TM5-4. In cases where samples were reanalyzed due to
a quality control (QC) failure during the original analysis of the sample, the results of the analysis
requiring less rigorous qualification were reported on Tables TMS-3 and TM5-4.
The water samples were analyzed using the following methods:
Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level VGA (USEPA 10/92)
Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level SVGA (USEPA 10/92)
Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level Pesticides/PCB's (USEPA 10/92)
Target Analyte List (TAL) Inorganics (USEPA ILM03.0)
Target Analyte List (TAL) Total Metals (USEPA ILM03.0)
Target Analyte List (TAL) Dissolved Metals (USEPA 1LM03.0)
The soil samples were analyzed using the following methods:
Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level VGA (USEPA 3/90)
Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level SVGA (USEPA 3/90)
Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level Pesticides/PCB's (USEPA 3/90)
Target Analyte List (TAL) Inorganics (USEPA ILM03.0)
RESULTS
This narrative pieseuts a summary of the laboratory QC deficiencies and the resulting qualification of the
TM5-2
Volatile Organic Compounds
Holding Times
Holding times are evaluated to address the validity of the results based on the elapsed time from time of
sample collection to time of sample analysis. All samples were analyzed within the required holding
time.
Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) Instrument Performance Check
Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) is analyzed every 12 hours to verify the instrument's mass resolution,
identification, and sensitivity. All BFB ion abundance criteria were met.
GC/MS Initial and Continuing Calibration
Initial calibration demonstrates instrument linearity and ensures that the instrument can produce
acceptable qualitative and quantitative results. The initial calibration percent relative standard deviation
(% RSD) must be less than 30 percent, and the relative response factor (RRF) must be greater than 0.05.
The % RSD for acetone was greater than 30 percent in the initial calibration associated with aqueous
samples; therefore, positive results for that compound were qualified as estimated in associated samples.
Continuing calibration checks are performed every 12 hours to demonstrate that the instrument can
produce acceptable qualitative and quantitative results as established by the initial calibration. The
continuing calibration percent difference (%D) must be less than 25 percent, and the RRF must be
greater than 0.05. All continuing calibrations met QC criteria.
Blanks
Laboratory (method) and field (trip) blanks are analyzed to determine the presence and magnitude of
contamination resulting from field or laboratory activities. Action levels are calculated at 5 times the
concentration in the associated blank (10 times for methylene chloride, acetone, and 2-butanone).
Sample results below this action level are considered attributable to blank contamination; results greater
9S100:2.DOC/M1002/M15-OI TM5-3
than this level are considered to be acceptable. Due to trip or laboratory method blank contamination,
acetone results were qualified as non-detected in associated samples where the results were below the
calculated blank action level.
Syvteaa Mmutorug Contpouds (Surrogates) Recoveries
System monitoring compounds are added to all samples and blanks prior to analysis to assess recovery
(accuracy). Action is taken if any system monitoring compound recoveries are outside the acceptance
range, or if any one recovery is less than 10 percent. System monitoring compound recovery criteria
were met for all samples.
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Dapticatr (MS/MSD)
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate analyses were performed at a frequency of 5 percent to assess
method precision and accuracy (although not required by SOW 10/92). The laboratory established
percent recovery (% R) and relative percent difference (RPD) criteria were met for the MS/MSD
performed on aqueous sample HL-GW-MW-04. Method '/• R and RPD criteria were met for the
MS/MSD performed on soil sample HL-VS-C3-B.
Laboratory Coatrol Saaapfe (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample analysis is required by SOW 10/92. Laboratory Control Samples are
generated once per sample delivery group (SDG) to provide information on the accuracy of the analytical
method and on the laboratory performance. Percent recovery criteria were met for the LCS analyzed in
the SDG of aqueous samples.
lateral Standard Response
The internal standard response is monitored for each sample to verify GC/MS sensitivity and the stability
of the detector's response. The internal standard area must be >SO percent and <IOO percent (± 40
percent for SOW 10/92), and the retention time must be within ±30 seconds (±20 seconds for SOW
10/92) of the associated calibration standard. All internal standard QC criteria were met
MMttUMCMMMMMI TMS-4
Target Compound Identification
Chromatograms and mass spectra are reviewed to minimize the reporting of false positive and false
negatives. For each compound detected, the relative retention time must be within ±0.06 units and the
qualitative criteria for mass spectral identification must be met. No problems were observed.
Compound Quantitation
Laboratory calculations were checked to verify that reported concentrations and CRQLs were accurate.
Results initially reported by the laboratory were not all correct. Extensive communication with the
laboratory was necessary to obtain correct results.
Tentatively Identified Compounds
All TIC spectra were reviewed to verify that the identifications were acceptable and that laboratory
contamination was taken into account. Reported concentrations are estimated (J) values.
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
Holding Times
Holding times are evaluated to address the validity of the results based on the elapsed time from time of
sample collection to time of extraction and analysis. Water samples must be extracted within 7 days of
sample collection, and soil samples must be extracted within 14 days. Sample analysis must be
performed within 40 days of sample extraction. Holding times were met for all samples.
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check
Decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP) is analyzed every 12 hours to verify the instrument's mass
resolution, identification, and sensitivity. All DFTPP ion abundance criteria were met.
9510022.DOC/MI002/S815-OI TM5-5
GC/MS Initial ud Coatiarag Calibration
Initial calibration demonstrates instrument linearity and ensures that the instrument can produce
acceptable qualitative and quantitative results. The initial calibration % RSD must be less than 30
percent, and the RRF must be greater than 0.05. No action was required due to initial calibration QC
failures.
Laboratory (method) blanks are analyzed to determine the presence and magnitude of contamination
resulting from laboratory activities. Action levels are calculated at 5 times the concentration in the
associated blank (10 times for phthalates). Sample results below this action level are considered
attributable to blank contamination; results greater than this level are considered to be acceptable. Due
to laboratory method blank contamination, di-n-butylphthalate and bis(2-ethyfbexyl)phtha]ate results
were qualified as non-detected in associated samples where the results were below the calculated blank
action level.
System Moahoriag Coatpoaads (Surrogates) Recoveries
Surrogates are added to all samples and blanks prior to extraction to assess recovery (accuracy). Action
is taken if any two acid or base/neutral surrogates are outside the acceptance range (as stated in National
Functional Guidelines) or if % R is below 10 percent for any acid or base/neutral surrogate in a sample.
No action was necessary due to surrogate % R QC failure.
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD)
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate analyses were performed at a frequency of 5 percent to assess
method precision and accuracy. MS/MSD analysis is not required by SOW 10/92, but is required by
SOW 3/90. The laboratory established % R and RPD criteria were met for the MS/MSD performed on
aqueous sample HL-GW-MW-04. No action was necessary due to % R or RPD QC deficiencies for the
MS/MSD performed on soil sample HL-SS-B6-I.
TM5-6
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample analysis is required by SOW 10/92. Laboratory Control Samples are
generated once per SDG to provide information on the accuracy of the analytical method and on the
laboratory performance. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol percent recovery was below the method QC limits for the
LCS analyzed in the SDG of aqueous samples; therefore, positive results were qualified as estimated and
non-detected results were rejected.
Internal Standard Response
The internal standard response is monitored for each sample to verify GC/MS sensitivity and the stability
of the detector's response. The internal standard area must be >50 percent and <100 percent (± 40
percent for SOW 10/92), and the retention time must be within ±30 seconds (±20 seconds for SOW
10/92) of the associated calibration standard. No action was necessary due to internal standard response
out of QC limits.
Target Compound Identification
Chromatograms and mass spectra are reviewed to minimize the reporting of false positive and false
negatives. For each compound detected, the relative retention time must be within ±0.06 units and the
qualitative criteria for mass spectral identification must be met. No problems were observed.
Compound Quantitation
Laboratory calculations were checked to verify that reported concentrations and CRQLs were accurate.
Results initially reported by the laboratory were not all correct. Extensive communication with the
laboratory was necessary to obtain correct results.
Tentatively Identified Compounds (TLCs)
All TIC spectra were reviewed to verify that the identifications were acceptable and that laboratory
contamination was taken into account. Reported concentrations are estimated (J) values.
95100Z2DOC/MI002/M15-01 TM5-7
Holding times are evaluated to address the validity of the results based on the elapsed time from time of
sample collection to time of extraction and analysis. Water samples must be extracted within 7 days of
sample collection, and soil samples must be extracted within 14 days. Sample analysis must be
performed within 40 days of sample extraction. Holding times were met for all samples.
iBStnuacBt PerfonttBce Check
Performance checks are performed to verify target compound resolution and the instrument's sensitivity.
For compound resolution criteria to be met, the resolution between the adjacent peaks in the resolution
check mixture must be greater than 60 percent, and the mixture must be analyzed at the frequency
specified by Che method. The performance evaluation mixture (PEM) most also be analyzed at the
frequency specified by the method; the retention times must be within the windows established by the
initial calibration analyses; the %D between the calculated and true concentration must be less man or
equal to 25 percent; and the endrin and 4,4'-DDT breakdown (the amount of decomposition that those
compounds undergo when analyzed on the GC column) must be less than or equal to 20 percent (30
percent for endrin and 4,4'-DDT combined). Resolution check mixture analyses met acceptance criteria
for all samples. Performance evaluation mixture analyses were performed at the required frequency and
met acceptance criteria for all samples.
laffial aid Coatinmg CaJibntio*
Initial calibration demonstrates instrument linearity and ensures that the instrument can produce
acceptable qualitative and quantitative results. The individual standard mixtures must be analyzed at the
concentrations and frequency specified by the method. For the initial calibration linearity criteria to be
met, the % RSD must be less than or equal to 20 percent for all compounds, except for die two
surrogates, for which the % RSD must not exceed 30 percent Standards were run at the required
frequency and acceptance criteria were met for all samples.
TM5-8
Continuing calibration checks are performed to demonstrate that the instrument can produce acceptable
qualitative and quantitative results as established by the initial calibration. The %D between the
calculated and true concentration of the individual mixtures A and B must be less than or equal to 25
percent, and the retention times must fall within the windows established by the initial calibration.
Standards were run at the required frequency and acceptance criteria were met for all samples.
Blanks
Laboratory (method and instrument) blanks are analyzed to determine the presence and magnitude of
contamination resulting from laboratory activities. Action levels are calculated at 5 times the
concentration in the associated blank. Sample results below this action level are considered attributable
to blank contamination; results greater than this level are considered to be acceptable. No action was
necessary due to laboratory method or instrument blank contamination because all results were non-
detected.
Surrogate Recoveries
Surrogate compounds are added to all samples and blanks prior to extraction to assess recovery
(accuracy). Action is taken if both surrogates are outside the acceptance range in either column, or if any
one surrogate recovery is less than 10 percent. No action was necessary due to surrogate recoveries
outside of QC limits.
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD)
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate analyses were performed at a frequency of 5 percent to assess
method precision and accuracy. MS/MSD analysis is not required by SOW 10/92, but is required by
SOW 3/90. Laboratory-established % R and RPD criteria were met for the MS/MSD performed on
aqueous sample HL-GW-MW-04. Method % R and RPD criteria were met for the MS/MSD performed
on soil sample HL-SS-B6-I.
93I0022.DOC/MI002/I8IS-OI TM5-9
Laboratory Coatrol Sanpfe (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample analysis is required by SOW 10/92. Laboratory Control Samples are
generated once per SDG to provide information on the accuracy of the analytical method and on the
laboratory performance. The LCS analyzed with aqueous samples met all QC criteria.
Cleanp Checks
Cleanup procedures (gel permeation chromatography [GPC] and florisil) are used to remove
interferences from sample extracts. Cleanup checks verify acceptable recovery of pesticides through the
cleanup process. Recoveries must be between 80 - 120 percent (florisil) and 80 - 110 percent (GPC).
These criteria were met
Target Compound Identification
Chromatograms and mass spectra are reviewed to minimize the reporting of false positive and false
negatives. For each compound detected, the retention time must be within the retention time window
determined during initial calibration for both the primary and confirmation columns and the %D between
the results obtained from each column must be less than 25 percent
CoHpond QwurthatMMi
Laboratory calculations were checked to verify that reported concentrations and CRQLs were accurate.
Results initially reported by the laboratory were not all correct Extensive communication with the
laboratory was necessary to obtain correct results.
Tentatively Identified Conpouds
All TIC spectra were reviewed to verify that the identifications were acceptable and that laboratory
contamination was taken into account Reported concentrations are estimated (J) values.
HMO TMS-10
Inorganics
Holding Times
Holding times are evaluated to address the validity of the results based on the elapsed time from sample
collection date to preparation. Maximum holding time for inorganics analyses are as follows:
metals (excluding mercury) - 6 months
mercury - 28 days
cyanide- 14 days
All samples were analyzed within the allowed holding times.
Calibration
Calibration demonstrates instrument linearity and ensures that the instrument can produce acceptable
qualitative and quantitative results. For the initial calibration linearity criteria to be met, the correlation
coefficient must be greater than 0.995 for mercury and cyanide analysis. Initial calibration verification
(ICV) and continuing calibration verification (CCV) %R must be between 90-110 percent (80 - 120
percent for mercury and 85 - 115 percent for cyanide). The CRDL standard for ICP must be prepared at
two times the CRDL and % R must be between 80-120 percent. The CRDL standard for ICP analysis
(CRI) was not prepared at the prescribed concentrations. Although National Functional Guidelines
indicate that the appropriate action in this case is to reject all data associated with the incorrectly mixed
CRIs, using professional judgment, the decision was made to qualify as estimated positive results of
analytes for which the laboratory had used a true value of less than two times the CRDL. Barium,
calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, sodium, and potassium positive results were qualified as
estimated. All other calibration criteria were met.
Blanks
Laboratory (preparation/calibration) blanks are analyzed to determine the presence and magnitude of
contamination resulting from laboratory activities. No action was necessary due to blank contamination.
9510022 DOC/MI002/M15-01 TM5-11
lateriereace Check Sample (ICS)
The ICS verifies the instrument's inter-element and background collection factors for inductively
coupled plasma (ICP) analyses. The ICS % R must be within 80 - 120 percent All results were
reviewed and found to be acceptable.
Laboratory Control Sanpfe (LCS)
The LCS monitors the overall laboratory performance from sample preparation through analysis.
Aqueous LCS recoveries must fall between 80 - 120 percent, and solid LCS results must fall within the
limits established by USEPA for that LCS. All reviewed results were found to be acceptable.
Laboratory Dapficate Analysis
Duplicate results provide a measure of the laboratory's analytical precision. The RPD must be less than
SO percent (100 percent for soil) for sample results 5 times the CRDL, or ± the CRDL (±2 times the
CRDL for soil) for sample results less than 5 times the CRDL. Aluminum and calcium duplicate results
were not within acceptance limits for soil samples; therefore, positive results for these analytes in the
associated samples were qualified as estimated.
Matrix Spike
Matrix spike analyses are performed to assess method accuracy. Spike recoveries must fall within the
range of 75 - 125 percent All matrix spike % R were within QC limits.
ICP Serial DihrtkM
Serial dilution analyses evaluate the effects of physical or chemical interferences in the sample matrix.
Serial dilution results must agree within 1 5 %D of the original sample for results greater than SO times
IDL. Zinc did not meet QC criteria in the serial dilution performed for soil samples. Positive and non-
detected results for that analyte in associated soil samples were qualified as estimated
TM5-12
Sample Result Verification
Laboratory calculations were checked to verify that reported concentrations and IDLs were accurate.
The calculations which were reviewed were performed correctly, and the CRDLs were adjusted for
sample size, percent solid content for soil samples, and dilution factors.
95I0022.DOC/MI002/SSIS-01 TM5-13
Attachment I - Definition of Laboratory Qualifiers
(for Tables TM5-1 and TM5-2- Laboratory Report of Analysis)
J - Indicates an estimated concentration below the contract required detection level (CRQL) but
greater than 0 or when estimating a concentration for TICs.
U - Indicates that compound was analyzed but not detected. The sample quantitation limit is
adjusted for dilution and percent moisture.
B - Indicates analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated laboratory method blank.
E - Indicates that the analyte concentration exceeded the calibration range of the GC/MS and that a
re-analysis of a diluted sample is required.
D - Indicates that sample concentration was obtained by dilution to bring result within calibration
range.
N - Indk***** presumptive evidence of a compound. This flag is used for TICs were the
identification is based on a library search and is applied to all TIC results. For general classes of
compounds (hydrocarbons, etc.) this flag is not used.
P - This flag is used for pesticides/PCBs when there is greater than 25% difference between the
concentrations on the two columns used for analysis. The lower value is reported.
C - This flag applies to pesticide/PCBs results when the identification has been confirmed by
GC/MS.
A - Indinrty? that a TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
TM5-14
X - Laboratory-defined qualifier used to provide additional information not covered by the other
qualifiers.
Inorganic Data Qualifiers
E - The reported concentration is estimated because of the presence of an interference.
M - Duplicate injection precision criteria were not met.
N - Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
S - The reported concentration was determined by the method of standard additions.
W - Post-digestion spike for furnace atomic absorption analysis is outside control limits.
B - Concentration reported is below CRDL but greater than the IDL.
* - Duplicate analysis not within control limits.
+ - Correlation coefficient for the method of standard additions was less than 0.995
U - Indicates that compound was analyzed but not detected. The sample quantitation limit is
adjusted for dilution and percent moisture.
95IOOU.DOC/MI002/ISIS-01 TMS-15
Attachment II - Definition of Validation Qualifiers
(for Tables TM5-3 and TM5-4 - Validation/Summary Table)
J . Estimated concentration because QC criteria were not met
R - Results were rejected because of serious QC deficiencies.
U- Indicates that compound was analyzed but not detected. The sample quantitation limit is
adjusted for dilution and percent moisture.
N - Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound. This flag is used for TICs were the
identification is based on a library search and is applied to all TIC results. For general classes of
compounds (hydrocarbons, etc.) this flag is not used.
UJ - Quantitation limit was rsrimatrd concentration because QC criteria were not met
JN - Presence of an anaryte was tentatively identified and the associated result represents an estimated
concentration.
TMS-16
TABLE TM5-1CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL BORING SAMPLES
MDEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995
Sample Location:Sample Date:
HL-SS-B6-)7/11/95
HL-SS-BS-l(re)7/11/95
Re-Analysis
HL-VS-C3-B7/11/95
HL-VS-C3-B(re)7/11/95
Re-AnalysisVolatile Organic* Unto
ChtoromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChtoroethaneMethylene chlorideAcetoneCarbon disulffde1.1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dtchloroethane1,2-Dlchloroethene (total)Chloroform1.2-Dlchloroetham2-Butanone (MEK)1.1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorldeJromodlchloromethanet ,2-Dlchloroproparw;ls-1 ,3-DichloropropeneFrichloroetheneDlbromochloromethane,1.2-Trichloroethane
Benzenerans-1 ,3-Dlchloropropene3romoforml-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)-Hexanone'etrachloroethene,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane'oluene;hlorobenzeneIthyl benzene•tyreneylene (total)
Semlvolatlle Oroanlcthenoli«(2-Chloroethyl)Ether-Chlorophenol,3-Dlchlorobenzene,4-Dlchlorobenzene2-CNchlorobenzene•Methylphenol2'-oxybis(1 -Chtoropropane)•Methylphenol-Nitroso-DI-n-PropylamineexachloroethaneitrobenzeneophoroneNltrophenol4-Dimethylphenol»(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane4-CHchlorophenol2,4-TrichlorobenzeneiphthaleneChloroanillne
ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg
Unrttug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg
ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg
10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U4 J
10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U4 J
10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
TABLE TMS-1 (ConttMMd)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOI. BORMG SAMPLES
WASTE MMUGEMBTT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IJULY1M9
7/I1W5HL-SS-W-Krv)
7/11/WHL-VS-C3-B HL-VS-C3-B(r*)
7/11/95
330 U3SOU330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 Uaoou330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 Uaoouaoou330 U330 U330 U330 U330 Uaoouaoou330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 U330 U330 U«• BJ330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UMBJ
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U
MAHANAHAMANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
NAMANANANANANANAMANANA
NANANANA
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 Uaoou330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 Uaoouaoou330 U330 U330 U330 U330 Uaoouaoou330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 U330 U330 UffSBJ
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U77 BJ
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
NA
NANA
NANA
.(LMM)
1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U13 U3JU
1.0 U1.0 U1.0 U1.0U1.0 U1.0 U1.0 U1.0 U2.0 U2.0 U
1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U3JU13 U
1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U3.3 U3.3 U
TABLE TM5-1 (Continued)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL BORING SAMPLES
MDEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995
Sample Location: HL-SS-B6-I
Sample Date: 7/11/95
Pesticides (Cont.)
EndrinEndosulfan II4,4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfate
4.4'-DDT
Methoxychlor
Endrin ketoneEndrin aldehydealpha-Chlordane
gamma-ChlordaneToxaphene
Aroclor-1016
Aroclor-1221
Aroctor-1232
Arodor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254
*roclor-1260
Total Meta|s
Mumlnum\ntimony
\nm\c3arium
Jeryltium
Cadmium
Jaldum
Chromium
MaltJopperronMdMagnesiumtanganes*lercury
Ickel'otassiumelenlum
liverodium
hallium
anadium
Incyanlde
Units
ug/kgug/kgup/kg
ug/kg
ug/kgug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kgug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kgug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kgug/kg
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kgmg/kg
mg/kB
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kgmg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kgmg/kgmg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/fcBmg/kg
3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U17 U
3.3 U3.3 U1.7 U1.7 U
170 U33 U67 U33 U33 U33 U33 U33 U
1,290 E*0.04 U0.2424.70.24 U0.022*0 E*3.81.2 []6.6*
1,900 E1.8*
398 E16.6 E*0.03 U*3.0182 []0.11 []0.02 U13.6 []0.04 U44
62.6 E0.05 U
HL-SS-B6-l(re)
7/11/95Re-Analysis
2.0 U2.0 U2.0 U2.0 U2.0 U10 U
2.0 U2.0 U1.0 U1.0 U100 U20 U40 U20 U20 U20 U20 U20 U
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
HL-VS-C3-B
7/11/95
3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U17 U
3.3 U3.3 U1.7 U1.7 U170 U33U67 U33 U33 U33 U33 U33 U
2,700 E*
0.04 U0.409.3
0.24 U0.03
1,680 E*3.7
0.96 U4.3*
1,760 E2.0 •
673 E16.4 E*0.03 U*3.6197 []
0.13 []0.02 U17-4 []0.04 U3.7
64.2 E0.05 U
HL-VS-C3-B(re)
7/11/95
Re-Analysis
3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U17 U
3.3 U3.3 U1.7 U1.7 U
170 U33 U67 U33U33 U33 U33 U33 U
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
Notes: U - Indicate* that compound wat analyzed for but not detected. The sample quantltatlon limit I* adjusted for dilution and percent moisture.
J - Indicates an estimated concentration below the contract required detection level (CRQL) but greater than 0 or when estimating aconcentration for TIC*.
B - Indicates analyte was detected In both the sample and the associated laboratory method blank.
[ ] - Concentration reported Is below CRDL but greater than the IDL
E - The reported concentration is estimated because of the presence of an Interference.
* • Duplicate analysis not within control limits.
NA-Not analyzed.
- Analytes detected are shown In bold text
MIUMJOWMMU/ail-OO
TABLE TM5-2CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNOWATER SAMPLES
MDEQ • WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE 0JULY 1995
Sample Location:Sample Date:
dauiuiiieinaneTMnometnane
Vinyl ChlorideCntoflMOMM
AcetoneCarton duuNide1.1-OkhloroeJhene1.1-Oichloreathane1 -OfcNoroathene (total)Chtorofonn1.2-OkNoroethane2-6utanone (MtK),1.1-Tiicnlocoetnane
Carton TebachtoridewnodicMoronMinane
Tncraoroelnene
.ix-TiniamueuianeBenzenetnro-1>DicNoropropeneQromufuiiii44MhyU-penlanone (MIBK)•» • •t-i laiaiiuueretracNoroePiene1.1 3'TetrachlofDethanerohieneChtorobenzaneEViybenzaneStyrenetytane (total)
3ft* «uti'TOeWm
*(2X»lofoa!hyl)Bher!-CMofophenol,3-DicNofQbenzene
-Ofcnkwobenzane-Methytphenol! -aocybis(1-Chloroprooene)•Metnylphenoll-NRJroso-Oi-<>-Propytaminel j uiifcl__- B- JAV^h—kleHaKiiionMinanv«» — ••TOOBIUJBIPJ
-Nwupntnoi_4-DinMihvlntMnal
• M*JIug/L
._— •ugA.ua/Lugn.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.. ir>nugA.ugA.• MeJIug/LugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.• M*Jiug/LugA.ugA.
•ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.
ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.itftHugn.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.,,,-•1ugA.• M.JIug/Lua/L
HL-OW-MW-047/17/95
1 U1 i iU1 U1 1 1U2 U5 J
SOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U
sou1 1 1U1 U4 1 11 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 1 1U1 U1 U1 1 1U
sousou1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U3U
SU5U5U5U5 11
U
5U5USU5U5U5USU5 1 •U5 1 1U5 U
HL-GW-MW-04(d) HL-GW-MW-O57/17/95 7/17/95
ReW Duplicate
NAt|ANANABkIANANAp*rNANANANANANANANAB.IANA
NAKlANANANANANAKlANA
NANAKlANANANANANANANANANANA
NANANANA
NANANANANANANABkl ANAKlANANA
1 U1 1 I
U
1 U1 1 1U2 u
U
2 JSOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U
sou1 1 1U
1 U1 1 1U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 1 1U
1 U1 U1 1 1U
sousou1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U3U
SUSUSUSU511
U
SUSUSUSUSUSUSU5 1 1U5 1 1U5 U
HL-GW-MW-05(re)7/17/95
Re-Analysis
NAMANA
NAMANANAIV^
NANANANANANANANAKlANA
NAKlANANANANANAKlANA
NANAKlANANANANANANANANANANA
NANANANAKlANn
NANANANANANANAkl ANAKlANANA
TABLE TM5-2 (Continued)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR OROUNDWATER SAMPLES
MDEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995
Sample Location:Sample Date:
HL-GW-MW-047/17/95
HL-GW-MW-04(d) HL-GW-MW-057/17/95 7/17/95
Field Duplicate
HL-GW-MW-OS(re)7/17/95
Re-AnalysisSemlvolatlle Oraanlca fCont.l Units
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1 ,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachlorobutadiene4-Chlor-3-Methylphenol2-MethylnaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-Chloronaphthalene2-NitroanilineDimethylphthalateAcenaphthylene2,6-Dinitrotoluene3-NitroanailineAcenaphthene2,4-Dinitrophenol4-NitrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-DinrtrotolueneDiethylphthalate4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether;luorenel-Nitroanilinet,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol^-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)i-Bromophenyl-phenyletherHexachlorobenzene3entachlorophenol'henanthreneAnthracene^arbazole3i-n-ButylphthalateMuoranthene'yreneiutylbenzylphthalate,3'-Dichlorobenzidine)enzo(A)anthraceneIhrysenels(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate)i-n-Octylphthalate)enzo(b)Fluoranthene)enzo(k)Fluoranthene)enzo(a)Pyreneideno( 1 ,2, 3-cd)Pyrene>ibenz(a,h)Anthraceneenzo(g,h,i)Perylene
ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L
5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U
. 5 U5 U5 U5 U
20 U5 U
20 U5 U5 U5U
20 U5 U
20 U20 U5 U5U5 U5 U5 U
20 U20 U5 U5 U5 U
20 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U2 BJ5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U
20 U5 U
20 U5 U5 U5 U
20 U5 U
20 U20 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U
20 U20 U5 U5 U5 U
20 U5 U5U5 U5 U5 U5 U
0.4 J •5 U5 U5 U
0.5 BJ5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
Pl». J of 4
TABLE TMS-2 (Continued)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR OROUNDWATER SAMPLES
UDEQ -WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE HJULY 1995
Sampa
PwtiddW
ateha-BHCbata-BHCdtta-8HCgamma-BHC (Lindana)IteptochtorAldrintAoMMt M^^af r flMMWH^A
EndosuManlDMdrin4.4*-DOEEndrinEndosuHan II4.4--ODDEndosuKan SuMate4.4--ODT|J -ff, .,- „ -nt.| 1, -•MnODtycraorCMMI KBUMWcflonn aioanyda•teha-CMordana
lonpnanaArodoMOieftrodor-1221Arodor-1232ftrodor-1242fodor-1248
fcoctor-1254WDdor-1280
Total MataliMuminum
IfMnictariumfeyewm«aduimniXHum(hromiumUAaR''Opparran•adlagnaahmtangaiMMtarcuryidealtitaniumatonium9modwm
la Location:•note Date:
yjteugfl.u0AugA.uo/LugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.
mugA.mugA.
ugA.• H«JIugn.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.
yjteugA.
mugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.
HL-OW4IW-047/17I9S
0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.50 U
A A4A 1 10.010 UA A4A 1 1o.uio u0.010 UA A4fl 1 1U.U1U U
0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U
33J1A 1 I.0 Uzou
20.0 U5.0 U
0.10 U20,900
20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U60J>[]1.0 U
5^202U0-20 U20.0 U
1 00 []ZOU
0.50 UM10 [I
HL-OW4IW-04<d)7/17/95
FieW Duplicate
NA
N*t4ANANANANANANANANANANANANANA•JANAkJANA
NA•JANA
NANANANANANANANA
28.61A 1 1.0 Uzou
20.0 U5.0 U
0.10 U20,200
20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U47.0 []1.0 U
5,68021.00.20 U20.0 U
1,380 [}ZOU
0.50 U1,320 []
HL-GW-MW-057/17/95
0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.50 U
A A4A 1 1O.QiO UA A.4A 1 IO.UIO U
0.010 UA A4fl 1 1U.Ultl U
0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U
254In i •.0 U2jB
20.0 U5.0 U
0.10 U21.500
20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U•901 []1.0 U
5,8801780.20 U20.0 U
1.170 []ZOU
0.50 U1.340 []
HL-GW-MW-OS(re)7/17/95
Re-Analysis
0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.50 U
0 /14 All.010 UA A4A 1 10.010 U0.010 UOfMn 1 1.010 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U
NA•kl ANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
TABLE TM5-2 (Continued)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR OROUNDWATER SAMPLES
MDEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995
Sample Location:Sample Date:
Total Metali fCont.1ThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide
Dissolved MetalsAluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperranLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel3otassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumrhalllum/anadiumline
Unitsug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L
Unitsug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L
HL-GW-MW-047/17/95
1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U5.0 U
23.21.0 U2.0 U
20.0 U5.0 U
0.10 U20,600
20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U1.0 U
5,66021.00.20 U20.0 U
1,300 []2.0 U
0.50 U1,370 []
1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U
HL-GW-MW-04(d) HL-GW-MW-057/17/95 7/17/95
Field Duplicate
1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U
NA
23.71.0 U2.0 U
20.0 U5.0 U
0.10 U20,700
20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U1.0 U
5,75020.00.20 U20.0 U
1,320 []2.0 U
0.50 U1,400 []
1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U
1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U5.0 U
21.51.0 U2.6
20.0 U5.0 U
0.10 U20,900
20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U86.0 []
1.0 U5,670
1700.20 U20.0 U
1,130 []2.0 U
0.50 U1,360 []
1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U
HL-OW-MW-OS(re)7/17/95
Re-Analysis
NANANANA
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
Notes: U - Indicate* that compound was analyzed for but not detected. The sample quantftaUon limit is adjusted for dilution and percent moisture.J - Indicates an estimated concentration below the contract required detection level (CRQL) but greater than 0 or when estimating a
concentration for TICs.B - Indicates analyte was detected In both the sample and the associated laboratory method blank.[ ] - Concentration reported Is below CROL but greater than the IDL.
NA - Not analyzed.• Analytes detected are shown in bold text.
TABLE TMS-3VAUDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOL BORMG SAMPLES
MOEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IJULY 1995
Date:HL-i
7/11JMHL-VS-C3-B
TfllJK
10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U4J
1Z4-TrtcNarabram
10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UJ330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U
10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U4J10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 u10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UJ330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U
TABLE TMS-3 (Continued)VAUDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL BORING SAMPLES
MDEQ -WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995
Sample Location:Sample Date:
SanMVolatlle Oroanlc* (Cont.lHaxachlorobutadiana4-Chtor-3-Methylphenol2-MethylnaphtnateneHexachlorocyclopentadlene2,4,6-Trichtorophenol2,4,5-Trtehlorophenol2-Chtoronaphthalene2-NltroanillneDlmethylphthalateAcenaphthytene2,6-Dlnftrotoluene3-NKroanallineAcanaphthene2,4-Dlnftrophenol4-NltrophenolDlbenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneDiethylphthalate4-Chlorophenyt-phenyletherFluorene4-Nttroanillnet,6-Dlnttro-2-MethylphenolN-Nttrosodiphenylarnlne (1)t-Bromophenyl-phenyletherHexachlorobenzene'entachlorophenol3henanthrena\nthraceneJartoazole31-n-Butylphthalate"luoranthene>yrenetutylbenzylphthalate
13t-Dlchlorobenzldlne
)enzo(A)anthraceneihryaenate(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate(l-n-Octytphthalateenzo(b)Fluorantheneanzo(k)Fluoranthaneenzo(a)PyreneKleno(1 ,2,3-cd)Pyrenelbenz(a,h)Anthraceneenzo(g,h,l)Perylene
PMticldeaIpha-BHCata-BHCelta-BHCamma-BHC (Llndane)eptachlorIdrineptachlor epoxldendosulfan 1leldrin
Uniteug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg
"8*8ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg
Uniteug/kg
"8*8ug/kg
"8*8ug/kg
"8*9ug/kgug/kgug/kg
HL-SS-B6-J7/11/95
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U800 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U800 U800 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U800 U800 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UJ330 UJ330 UJ330 U330 U330 U330 UJ
1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U3.3 U
HL-VS-C3-B7/11/95
330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U800 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U800 U800 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U800 U800 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UJ330 UJ330 UJ330 U330 U330 U330 UJ
1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U3.3 U
VAUDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOL BOMNG SAMPLESMOEQ -WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE I
JULY 1995
7/11195HL-VS-C3-B
7/11WS
4.4-OOE.
UP*
3JU33U3JU3JU3-3U3-3U17 U3JU3JU1.7 U1.7 U170 U33 U67 U33U33U33 U33U33 U
O04UftMMJ024U
U
IJ
MJo.tau
§.11J0.02 UttJJ0.04 U
aosu
13 U3JU3JU3u3U13 U33U17 U3JUUU1.7 U1.7 U170 U33U67 U33 U33U33U33U33 U
OJ04U
024 U
OJB6U
•n1&4aosu
«7JCtt JO02U174 JO04U
M2JOJ6U
iMbi
TABLE TM5-4 (Continued)VALIDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
MDEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995
Sample Location:Sample Date:
Volatile OrganlcsChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene chlorideAcetoneCarbon disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethene (total)Chloroform1,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone (MEK)1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 ,1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenerans-1 ,3-DichloropropeneJromoform4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 ,1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneDhlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyrene(ylene (total)
Semlvojatila Oroanlcashenol)is(2-Chloroethyl)Ether'-Chlorophenol,3-Dichlorobenzene,4-Dichlorobenzene,2-Dichlorobenzene
'-Methylphenol> ,2'-oxybis(1 -Chloropropane)l-MethylphenolJ-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine•foxachloroethaneNitrobenzenesophorone'-Nitrophenol!,4-Dimethylphenol
IMSug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L
Uniteug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L
HL-GW-MW-047/17/95
1 U1 U1 U1 U2 U
50 UJSOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U
SOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U
sousou1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U3U
5U5U5U5U5U5 U5U5 U5U5 U5U5 U5 U5U5 U
HL-GW-MW-04(d)7/17/95
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
NANANANANANANANANANANA,NANANANA
HL-GW-MW-057/17/95
1 U1 U1 U1 U2U
50 UJ50 U
1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U
SOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U
sousou1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U3 U
5U5 U5U5 U5 U5U5 U5 U5U5 U5U5 U5U5 U5U
95I2WIXLS/MMJ2/H15-OO PIT I of 4
TABLE TM5-4 (Continued)VALIDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES '
MDEQ -WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE DJULY 1995
SamptoSm
^ • •_-»•- /"Ww»^«»l*»^ it*****j pumMMMi %Jt ^npj» IWDII
1 Z4-Tric«orobenzene
4-Chkman.ne
ZHMQViyvispwiflioooj 1 • i i ii iilil n fin !• irJn •» n gJ«a rCi*j» m
2.4.6-TncfBoropnenol2.4 -TricMcmphenol
2£OMrotohwne
ALenapnmeoc2,4-OrtrophenolM h bHMkl»AMM*l4-NrapnenoiWMM|||ABIB|
^ liln nn nh m nt J M§kM*M^ I* »4-cnHropn0nyi pnenynowrFknraneM &DkM» M 9Mk«i_4-MnMnmt^ A ^ »abM *% ttmMm lii •••nl•.(MJrao- -Maviy jiranai
WIHMVMW
•% - ^^^^^J^K>nmoiBDNvBuMpMhaWe
IWM^ k » MMk«bJdlk l ^xATymwnzy inanvMX7-OicMorabenziifne
CtayMne
M-n-OctripMhaMe96nzoib|rluoranneneMnzo(R)rluonnnene3anzo(a)Pyrenendano(1 3<d)Pyrane
)onzo(g,h.i)Perytene
I 11 n •llnaiLocmon.
U Unta
ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.
ugA.ugA.
HL-GW-MW-047/17/95
5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U
R20 U5U
20 U5U5U5U
20 U5U
20 U20 U5U5U5U5U5U
20 U20 U5U5U5U
20 U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5UJ5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U
HL-GW-MW-04<d)7/17/95
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA QNANANANANANANANANANANA
HL-GW-MW-057/17/95
5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U
R20 U5U
20 U5U5U5U
20 U5U
20 U20 U5U5U5U5U5U
20 U20 U5U5U5U
20 U5U5U5U5U5U5U
(L4J |5UJ5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U
TABLE TM5-4 (Continued)VALIDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
MDEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995
Sample Location: HL-GW-MW-04 HL-GW-MW-04(d) HL-GW-MW-05Sample Date: 7/17/95 7/17/95 7/17/95
Pesticidesalpha-BHCbeta-BHCdelta-BHCgamma-BHC (Lindane)HeptachlorAldrinHeptachlor epoxideEndosulfan IDieldrin4,4'-DDEEndrinEndosulfan II4,4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfate4,4'-DDTMethoxychlorEndrin ketoneEndrin aldehydealpha-Chlordanejamma-ChlordaneToxaphenefcroclor-1016Aroclor-1221<Vroclor-1232Hroclor-1242(\roclor-1248"Vroclor-1254\roclor-1260
Total MetalsMuminum\ntimony\rsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumDobaltHopperron.eadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel'otassiumSeleniumSilverSodium
Uniteug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.50 U NA 0.50 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 U
Unitsug/L 33.8 1 28.6J 25.6Jug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Uug/L 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.*6lug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 5.0 U 5.0 U 5.0 Uug/L 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10 Uug/L 20,900 J 20,200 J 21,500 J |ug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 60.0 J 47.0 J 93.0 Jug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Uug/L 5,820 J 5,680 J 5,860 Jug/L 22.0 J 21.0 J 178 Jug/L 0.20 U 0.20 U 0.20 Uug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 1,400 J 1,380 J 1,170 Jug/L 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 Uug/L 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 Uug/L 1,410 J 1,320 J 1,340 J
93I20SI.XLS/MI422/II13-00
TABLE TMS-4 (Continued)VALIDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
• WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE aJULY 1995
ToMMrtThefcumVanedumZincCyanide
DMBOtaAluminumAiaiiMMiyAraaracBariumBefyBumCadmiumCalciumCtwomunCobalCopperIranLead
MercuryWokel
SetariumSeVerSodumThalumVanadunOne
Note*: U-MJ-Etf
UJ-Oui
R-ta
Sample Locaflon:
tMifTTimn "•*•ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.
•dJMaM UnjtiugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.
HL-GW4MMM7/17/95
1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U5.0 U
2X2|1.0 U2.0 U
20.0 U5.0 U
0.10 U20.SOO J
20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U1.0 U
5JCO J214IJ0^0 U20.0 U
1 00 Jzou
0^0 U1470 J
1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U
SMlH tHt OORvpOUnd MS •YHflyXBd faf but HOl OBtKlBd. IT
HL-GW4MMM(d) HL-GW-MW457/17/95 7/17/95
1.0 U 1.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U 20.0 UNA 5.0 U
23.7J | 21.5J1.0 U 1.0 U2.0 U | 2JB\
20.0 U 20.0 U5.0 U 5.0 U
0.10 U 0.10 U20,700 J | 20JOO J
20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U | MJO J1.0 U 1.0 U
5,750 J 1 5,670 J20.0 J I 170 J0.20 U 0.20 U20.0 U 20.0 U
1.320 J | 1.130 J2.0 U 2.0 U
0.50 U 0.50 U1,400 J | 1.360 J
1.0 U 1.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U
• Mvnplv puBnttatton bral m •opuilBd ivdeiUeion end pMjcint fnoeVtuTv.
VM ww not met.