level crossing: summary of finding and key human factors issues
TRANSCRIPT
HSE Health & Safety
Executive
Level crossings Summary of findings and key human factors issues
Prepared by Davis Associates Limited for the Health and Safety Executive 2005
RESEARCH REPORT 359
HSE Health & Safety
Executive
Level crossings Summary of findings and key human factors issues
Davis Associates Limited Wyllyotts Place
Potters Bar Hertfordshire
EN6 2JD
Level crossings currently present the largest risk of a multi-fatality incident on the railway network. Her Majesty’s Railway Inspectorate (HMRI), a division of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), has a role in the approval, inspection and investigation of incidents involving level crossings. To ensure risks are better controlled, HMRI are seeking to develop their understanding of human factors issues at level crossings.
This report is the first of three reports being produced by Davis Associates for HMRI’s project, ‘Level crossings: Future Human Factors Priorities, new technologies and tools for inspectors’.
This report summarises the findings from a literature review, site visits, interviews with stakeholders and a validation exercise. The findings and key human factors issues are presented in a database format for ease of use and searching using keywords. It also provides a traceable source of information for the development of Inspectors’ tools and approaches.
This report and the work it describes were funded by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Its contents, including any opinions and/or conclusions expressed, are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect HSE policy.
HSE BOOKS
© Crown copyright 2005
First published 2005
ISBN 0 7176 6132 6
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may bereproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means (electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the priorwritten permission of the copyright owner.
Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to:Licensing Division, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ or by e-mail to [email protected]
ii
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
([HFXWLYH�6XPPDU\
3L]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�J\YYLU[S`�WYLZLU[�[OL�SHYNLZ[�YPZR�VM�H�T\S[P�MH[HSP[`�PUJPKLU[�VU�[OL�
YHPS^H`�UL[^VYR���/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�0UZWLJ[VYH[L��/490���H�KP]PZPVU�VM�[OL�/LHS[O�
HUK�:HML[`�,_LJ\[P]L��/:,���OHZ�H�YVSL�PU�[OL�HWWYV]HS��PUZWLJ[PVU�HUK�PU]LZ[PNH[PVU�
VM�PUJPKLU[Z�PU]VS]PUN�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���;V�LUZ\YL�YPZRZ�HYL�IL[[LY�JVU[YVSSLK��/490�HYL�
ZLLRPUN�[V�KL]LSVW�[OLPY�\UKLYZ[HUKPUN�VM�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�
;OPZ�YLWVY[�PZ�[OL�ÄYZ[�VM�[OYLL�YLWVY[Z�ILPUN�WYVK\JLK�I`�+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�MVY�/490»Z�
WYVQLJ[��¶/HYHO�FURVVLQJV��)XWXUH�+XPDQ�)DFWRUV�3ULRULWLHV��QHZ�WHFKQRORJLHV�DQG�
WRROV�IRU�LQVSHFWRUV·���
;OPZ�YLWVY[�Z\TTHYPZLZ�[OL�ÄUKPUNZ�MYVT�H�SP[LYH[\YL�YL]PL^��ZP[L�]PZP[Z��PU[LY]PL^Z�^P[O�
Z[HRLOVSKLYZ�HUK�H�]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL���;OL�ÄUKPUNZ�HUK�RL`�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�HYL�
WYLZLU[LK�PU�H�KH[HIHZL�MVYTH[�MVY�LHZL�VM�\ZL�HUK�ZLHYJOPUN�\ZPUN�RL`^VYKZ���0[�HSZV�
WYV]PKLZ�H�[YHJLHISL�ZV\YJL�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�MVY�[OL�KL]LSVWTLU[�VM�0UZWLJ[VYZ»�[VVSZ�
HUK�HWWYVHJOLZ���
(�Z\TTHY`�VM�[OL�ÄUKPUNZ�HYL!
���� ;V�KH[L������O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�OH]L�ILLU�KLÄULK�
���� ��O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�YLSH[L�[V�WYV[LJ[LK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�
���� ���PZZ\LZ�YLSH[L�[V�\UWYV[LJ[LK�JYVZZPUNZ�
���� ;OL�ZPNUHSSLY�PZ�YLMLYYLK�[V�^P[OPU���VM�[OL�PZZ\LZ��^P[O�YLNHYK�[V�JVTT\UPJH[PVU��
JVU[HJ[PUN��KL[LJ[PVU�VM�VIQLJ[Z�HUK�[YHJR�ZPKL�^VYRLYZ��JHTLYH�HUNSL�HUK�ZPNUHS�
ZLJ[PVUZ�
���� .YV\WZ�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ�OH]L�ILLU�PKLU[PÄLK�HZ�PTWHJ[PUN�VU���VM�[OL�O\THU�
MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ���;OLZL�YLMLY�[V�NYV\WZ�PU�NLULYHS��WVZP[PVU�VM�ZHML[ �̀�WLKLZ[YPHUZ�VU�
]LOPJ\SHY�JYVZZPUNZ��WHZZLUNLY�JVTWSPHUJL�^P[O�4>3��[YLZWHZZLYZ�HUK�^HSRLYZ�PU�
NYV\WZ���
���� 6M�WHY[PJ\SHY�UV[L��WLKLZ[YPHU�\ZLYZ�HYL�HMMLJ[LK�I`�VUS`�� �PZZ\LZ��^OPSL�]LOPJSL�
KYP]LYZ��JHYZ��]HUZ��/.=Z� �TV[VYJ`JSPZ[Z��HYL�HMMLJ[LK�I`����O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�
���� ���O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�YLSH[L�[V�\ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUNZ��PUJS\KPUN�[OVZL�^P[O�
[LSLWOVULZ�VY�TPUPH[\YL�^HYUPUN�SPNO[Z���
���� (\[VTH[PJ�VWLU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�HYL�HMMLJ[LK�I`����VM�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�
iii
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
iv
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
&RQWHQWV ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������WHNL
,_LJ\[P]L�:\TTHY`������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ �iii
v*VU[LU[Z����� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ���
(JRUV^SLKNLTLU[Z������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ � vii
(IIYL]PH[PVUZ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��� ix
+LÄUP[PVUZ��� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� � xi
���������� 0U[YVK\J[PVU ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ �
�������������� ���)HJRNYV\UK���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ���:JVWL ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ �
�������������� ���6IQLJ[P]LZ ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ �
�����������
����������4L[OVK�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ��� 0U[YVK\J[PVU���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ���3P[LYH[\YL�YL]PL^ �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ���3L]LS�JYVZZPUN�]PZP[Z �������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ���:PNUHS�IV_�]PZP[Z �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ���3L]LS�JYVZZPUN�[YHPUPUN ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ��� 0U[LY]PL^Z ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ �
����������+H[HIHZL ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ���9LJVYKPUN�[OL�ÄUKPUNZ ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� �
�������������� ���+H[HIHZL�JVU[L_[ ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ �
��������������� ��(KKP[PVUHS�PUMVYTH[PVU������������������������������������������������������������������������������ �
����������-PUKPUNZ
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
5
5
7
7
8
9
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ � 10
�������������� ���:\TTHY`�VM�RL`�SP[LYH[\YL�ÄUKPUNZ ���������������������������������������������������������� � 10
�������������� ���:\TTHY`�VM�THPU�KH[HIHZL�ÄUKPUNZ ������������������������������������������������������ � 11
�������������� ���9LJ\YYPUN�/-�[OLTLZ ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ � 12
�������������� ���(KKYLZZPUN�/-�PZZ\LZ ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ � 15
�������������� ���4V]PUN�MVYL^HYK�[V�[VVSZ�HUK�HWWYVHJOLZ�MVY�0UZWLJ[VYZ ���������������������� � 16
�������������� ���+H[HIHZL�VM�/-�PZZ\LZ��WHNLZ�������������������������������������������������������� � 17-68
����������=HSPKH[PVU ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� � 69
�������������� ���6IQLJ[P]L �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� � 69
�������������� ���4L[OVK ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� � 70
�������������� ���-PUKPUNZ �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� � 71
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
v
�������������� ���-LHZHIPSP[`�VM�YHURPUN�/-�PZZ\LZ �������������������������������������������������������������� � 80�������������� ���=HS\L�VM�[OL�]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL���������������������������������������������������������������� � 80
9LMLYLUJLZ � ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� � 81
(WWLUKP_�(� ������������3L]LS�JYVZZPUN�]PZP[Z ���������������������������������������������������������������������� 91(WWLUKP_�)� �����������/-�PZZ\LZ�I`�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WL �������������������������������������������������� 99
vi
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
$FNQRZOHGJHPHQWV
;OL�H\[OVYZ�^V\SK�SPRL�[V�HJRUV^SLKNL�[OL�MVSSV^PUN�WLVWSL�HUK�VYNHUPZH[PVUZ�MVY�
[OLPY�Z\WWVY[�HUK�JV�VWLYH[PVU�K\YPUN�[OL�KL]LSVWTLU[�VM�[OPZ�YLWVY[����7YLZLU[LK�PU�
HSWOHIL[PJHS�VYKLY��
2UJDQLVDWLRQ 1DPH -RE�WLWOH ,QWHUYLHZHG
(YYP]H 2LP[O�:[LWOLUZVU :LJ[PVU�4HUHNLY D (Y[O\Y�4LSSV^Z�*VSSLNL -YLK�4HUU >HYKLU D (\[VTVIPSL�(ZZVJPH[PVU�
�((�
(UKYL^�/V^HYK� /LHK�VM�9VHK�:HML[` D
)YP[PZO�;YHUZWVY[�7VSPJL )LJR`�1HJRZVU (J[PUN�:LYNLHU[
)YP[PZO�;YHUZWVY[�7VSPJL +H]L�9VILY[ZVU 7VSPJL�*VUZ[HISL D )YP[PZO�;YHUZWVY[�7VSPJL 1VOU�;OVTWZVU *OPLM�0UZWLJ[VY� D +LSHPUL�)\ZLZ (U[OVU`�+LSHPUL�
:TP[O
4HUHNPUN�+PYLJ[VY
+LSHPUL�)\ZLZ 4HYR�+LSHPUL�:TP[O 4HUHNLY D /LHS[O�HUK�:HML[`�
3HIVYH[VY`��/:3�
4HY`�4PSSLY /PNOLY�,YNVUVTPZ[ D
/LHS[O�HUK�:HML[`� 4PRL�.YH` /LHK�VM�,YNVUVTPJZ�
3HIVYH[VY`��/:3� :LJ[PVU
/LSWZ[VU�7HYPZO�*V\UJPS 1VL�+VIZVU� *V\UJPSSVY� D /LSWZ[VU�7HYPZO�*V\UJPS 2H[OPL�9V^IV[OHT 7HYPZO�*SLYR
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`� (UKYL^�/HY]L` /4�0UZWLJ[VY�VM�9HPS^H`Z�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L��/490� �3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�ZLJ[PVU�
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
+HYYLU�(UKLYZVU
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
1VOU�*\SSLU
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
1VOU�;PSS` /4�7YPUJPWHS�0UZWLJ[VY�VM�
9HPS^H`Z D
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
2LP[O�:OLWOLYK /4�0UZWLJ[VY�VM�9HPS^H`Z
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
7H\S�>PSRPUZVU 6WLYH[PVUZ�0U[LSSPNLUJL�
4HUHNLY
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
9VILY[�)L]LYPKNL 9HPS^H`�0UZWLJ[VYH[L�
*VU[HJ[�6MÄJLY��90*6� D
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
:PTVU�:TP[O
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
:\L�1VOUZ[VU
vii
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L
4HYR�>OP[OHT 0UZWLJ[VY
/\THU�,UNPULLYPUN�3[K *SHPYL�;\YULY :LUPVY�,YNVUVTPZ[
5L[^VYR�9HPS )PSS�+PSSHYZ[VUL :PNUHSSLY��/LSWZ[VU�ZPNUHS�
IV_ D
5L[^VYR�9HPS +H]PK�1VULZ 3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�,UNPULLY D 5L[^VYR�9HPS ,TTH�3V^L /\THU�-HJ[VYZ�(K]PZVY
5L[^VYR�9HPS .H`UVY�-HYYPUN[VU 3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�9PZR�
4HUHNLY D
5L[^VYR�9HPS .PSILY[�-YHZLY :7(+�:[YH[LN`�4HUHNLY D 5L[^VYR�9HPS 1VOU�>OP[LOLHK 3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�9PZR�*VU[YVS�
*V�VYKPUH[VY D
5L[^VYR�9HPS 4HY[PU�:OVYL :PNUHSSLY��/LSWZ[VU�ZPNUHS�
IV_ D
5L[^VYR�9HPS 9VILY[�/H]LYJYVM[ 3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�9PZR�*VU[YVS�
*V�VYKPUH[VY D
5L[^VYR�9HPS :[L]L�9H` (ZZPZ[HU[�:PNUHSSLY�4HUHNLY�
�7L[LYIVYV\NO�:PNUHS�)V_�
5VY[OHTW[VUZOPYL�
*V\U[`�*V\UJPS�
�YLWYLZLU[Z�;YHMÄJ�HUK�
:HML[`�>VYRPUN�.YV\W�
9VIPU�/VKZKVU ;YHMÄJ�,UNPULLY D
9HPS�7HZZLUNLYZ�*V\UJPS�
�5VY[O�>LZ[�,UNSHUK�
0HU�>H[ZVU :HML[`�;HZR�-VYJL�TLTILY D
9HPS�7HZZLUNLYZ�*V\UJPS�
�:JV[SHUK�
1HTLZ�2PUN :HML[`�;HZR�-VYJL�TLTILY D
9HPS�7HZZLUNLYZ�*V\UJPS�
�,HZ[�VM�,UNSHUK�
1VOU�/H^RPUZ :HML[`�;HZR�-VYJL�TLTILY D
9HPS�7HZZLUNLYZ�*V\UJPS� :OLSSL`�.V\SK :HML[`�;HZR�;LHT�*V�
VYKPUH[VY
9HPS�:HML[`�HUK�
:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK�
�5H[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�
:HML[`�.YV\W�
(SHU�+H]PLZ 7YVQLJ[�4HUHNLY��5H[PVUHS�
3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�:HML[`�
.YV\W���:LJYL[HY`�
9HPS�:HML[`�HUK�
:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK
+Y��(UU�4PSSZ 7YPUJPWHS�/\THU�-HJ[VYZ
9HPS�:HML[`�HUK�
:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK
4PJOHLS�>VVKZ /LHK�VM�6WLYH[PVUZ�
9LZLHYJO
9L[PYLK��5L[^VYR�9HPS� /HYY`�;HIHLY[ ,_�3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�:[YH[LN`�
4HUHNLY D
viii
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
$EEUHYLDWLRQV
(( (\[VTVIPSL�(ZZVJPH[PVU��<2�
(JJVT� (JJVTTVKH[PVU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN��<ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUN�
(/) (\[VTH[PJ�OHSM�IHYYPLY
()*3 (\[VTH[PJ�IHYYPLY�JYVZZPUN�SVJHSS`�TVUP[VYLK
(6*3 (\[VTH[PJ�VWLU�JYVZZPUN�SVJHSS`�TVUP[VYLK
(6*9 (\[VTH[PJ�VWLU�JYVZZPUN�YLTV[LS`�TVUP[VYLK
): )YP[PZO�:[HUKHYK
);7 )YP[PZO�;YHUZWVY[�7VSPJL
)> )YPKSL^H`�JYVZZPUN
*09(: *VUÄKLU[PHS�0UJPKLU[�9LWVY[PUN�HUK�(UHS`ZPZ�:`Z[LT
**;= *SVZLK�*PYJ\P[�;LSL]PZPVU
+( +H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3PTP[LK
+M; +LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[��<2�
+6; +LWHY[TLU[�VM�;YHUZWVY[��<:(�
+;39 +LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[��3VJHS�.V]LYUTLU[�HUK�[OL�9LNPVUZ��<2�
-* -VV[WH[O�JYVZZPUN
-9( -LKLYHS�9HPSYVHK�(KTPUPZ[YH[PVU
/( /PNO^H`Z�(NLUJ`
/- /\THU�-HJ[VYZ
/.= /LH]`�NVVKZ�]LOPJSL
/4:6 /LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�:[H[PVULY`�6MÄJL��<2�
/490 /LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�0UZWLJ[VYH[L��<2�
59 5L[^VYR�9HPS��<2�
/:, /LHS[O�HUK�:HML[`�,_LJ\[P]L��<2�
/:3 /LHS[O�HUK�:HML[`�3HIVYH[VYPLZ�
3* 3L]LS�JYVZZPUN
4*. 4HU\HSS`�JVU[YVSSLK�NH[L
4*) 4HU\HSS`�JVU[YVSSLK�IHYYPLY��^VYRLK�MYVT�HKQHJLU[�JHIPU�ZPNUHS�IV_�
4*)�**;= 4HU\HSS`�JVU[YVSSLK�IHYYPLY�WYV[LJ[LK�I`�JSVZLK�JPYJ\P[�[LSL]PZPVU
4>3 4PUPH[\YL�^HYUPUN�SPNO[Z
59*0 5L[^VYR�9HPS�*VU[YVSSLK�0UMYHZ[Y\J[\YL
6* 6WLU�JYVZZPUN
6JJ\W� 6JJ\WH[PVU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN��<ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUN�
97* 9HPS�7HZZLUNLY�*V\UJPS
9.: 9HPS^H`�.YV\W�:[HUKHYK
90++69 9LWVY[PUN�VM�PUQ\YPLZ��KPZLHZLZ�HUK�KHUNLYV\Z�VJJ\YYLUJLZ�
YLN\SH[PVUZ
ix
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
9:* 9HPS^H`�:HML[`�*HZL
9::) 9HPS�:HML[`�HUK�:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK
:-? :[H[PVU�MVV[�JYVZZPUN
:40: :HML[`�4HUHNLTLU[�0UMVYTH[PVU�:`Z[LT
;93 ;YHUZWVY[�9LZLHYJO�3HIVYH[VY`
<2 <UP[LK�2PUNKVT��VM�.YLH[�)YP[HPU�
<:( <UP[LK�:[H[LZ�VM�(TLYPJH
<>* <ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUN
<>*�; <ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUN�^P[O�[LSLWOVUL
<>*�4>3 <ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUN�^P[O�TPUPH[\YL�^HYUPUN�SPNO[Z
^^^ >VYSK�>PKL�>LI
x
����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
'HÀQLWLRQV 7HUP 'HÀQLWLRQ 6RXUFH (JJVTTVKH[PVU� (�WYP]H[L�]LOPJ\SHY�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�JVUULJ[PUN�SHUK� 9.:��.2�
SL]LS�JYVZZPUN PU�[OL�ZHTL�V^ULYZOPW�ZLWHYH[LK�I`�H�YHPS^H`� .5����������
SPUL���4VZ[�JVTTVUS`�YLMLYLK�[V�HZ�º<ZLY�>VYRLK»�
(J[P]L�^HYUPUN (�KL]PJL�^OPJO�^HYUZ�\ZLYZ�VM�[OL�PTTPULU[� 9.:�.0�9;������
HYYP]HS�VM�H�[YHPU���:\JO�KL]PJLZ�TH`�IL�LP[OLY� ����
]PZPISL�VY�H\KPISL�
(\[VTH[PJ� (�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�^OLYL�[OL�WYV[LJ[P]L� 9.:������
JYVZZPUN LX\PWTLU[��L�N���IHYYPLYZ�HUK�HJ[P]L�^HYUPUNZ��PZ�
H\[VTH[PJHSS`�HJ[P]H[LK�I`�[OL�HWWYVHJOPUN�[YHPU
)HYYPLY (U`�LSLTLU[¯WLYTHULU[�VY�[LTWVYHY �̀�PU[LUKLK� +*4:��� �
[V�WYL]LU[�WLVWSL�MYVT�MHSSPUN��HUK�[V�YL[HPU��Z[VW�
VY�N\PKL�WLVWSL�
)LOH]PV\Y (�THUULY�VM�ILOH]PUN�VY�[OL�YLZWVUZL�VM�HU�
VYNHUPZT�[V�H�Z[PT\S\Z��
*VSSPUZ�
KPJ[PVUHY`
)SVJRPUN�IHJR ;OL�MVYTH[PVU�VM�H�Z[H[PVUHY`�VY�ZSV^�TV]PUN� 9.:������
X\L\L�VM�YVHK�[YHMÄJ�V]LY�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�JH\ZPUN�
VIZ[Y\J[PVU�VM�[OL�SPUL�
*SVZ\YL�ZLX\LUJL ;OL�ZLX\LUJL�VM�L]LU[Z��PUP[PH[LK�I`�[OL�ZPNUHSSLY��
JYVZZPUN�RLLWLY�VY�[OL�HWWYVHJO�VM�H�[YHPU�
9.:������
�H\[VTH[PJHSS`���^OPJO�HWWSPLZ�[OL�WYV[LJ[PVU�[V�
[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[V�WYL]LU[�\ZLYZ�MYVT�JYVZZPUN�
[OL�YHPS^H �̀
*VTT\UPJH[PVU ;OL�PTWHY[PUN�VY�L_JOHUNL�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU� *VSSPUZ�
KPJ[PVUHY`
*YVZZPUN <ZLK�PU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�KVJ\TLU[H[PVU�[V�TLHU� 9.:������
ºSL]LS�JYVZZPUN»��^OLYL�[OL�JVU[PU\LK�\ZL�VM�ºSL]LS�
JYVZZPUN»�ILJVTLZ�YLWL[P[P]L�HUK�SHIV\YLK�
*YVZZPUN�HI\ZL (U`�KLSPILYH[L�HJ[P]P[`�I`�H�\ZLY�H[�H�SL]LS� 9.:������
JYVZZPUN�^OPJO�KPMMLYZ�MYVT�[OL�JVYYLJ[�WYVJLK\YL�
MVY�\ZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN
*YVZZPUN�RLLWLY (�WLYZVU�HWWVPU[LK�H[�H�WLYTHULU[�NH[L�IV_�[V� 9.:������
JHYY`�V\[�[OL�UVYTHS�VWLYH[PUN�WYVJLK\YL�VM�H�
SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
*YVZZPUN�[PTL ;OL�[PTL�[HRLU�MVY�H�\ZLY�[V�[YHUZ]LYZL�[OL� 9.:������
JYVZZPUN�MYVT�[OL�KLJPZPVU�WVPU[�[V�H�WVZP[PVU�
VM�ZHML[`�VU�[OL�V[OLY�ZPKL�VM�[OL�YHPS^H`�SPULZ���
*YVZZPUN�[PTL�PUJS\KLZ�[PTL�[HRLU�MVY�[OL�\ZLY�[V�
THRL�H�KLJPZPVU�[V�JYVZZ��
+LJPZPVU�WVPU[ ;OL�WVPU[�H[�^OPJO�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLY�THRLZ�H�
KLJPZPVU�[V�JYVZZ�VY�^HP[�
9.:������
xi
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
,TLYNLUJ` (U�\UMVYLZLLU�VY�Z\KKLU�VJJ\YYLUJL��LZWLJPHSS`�
VM�KHUNLY��KLTHUKPUN�PTTLKPH[L�HJ[PVU�
*VSSPUZ�
+PJ[PVUHY`
3L]LS�JYVZZPUN (U�PU[LYZLJ[PVU�H[�[OL�ZHTL�SL]LS�VM�H�YVHK�� 9.:������
MVV[WH[O�VY�IYPKSL^H`�HUK�VUL�VY�TVYL�YHPS^H`�
[YHJRZ
6JJ\WH[PVU�SL]LS� (�WYP]H[L�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�^OPJO�NP]LZ�HJJLZZ� 9.:��.2�
JYVZZPUN IL[^LLU�WYLTPZLZ�HUK�H�W\ISPJ�OPNO^H �̀��4VZ[� .5����������
JVTTVUS`�YLMLYLK�[V�HZ�º<ZLY�>VYRLK»� /490������
6WLUPUN� ;OL�ZLX\LUJL�VM�L]LU[Z��PUP[PH[LK�I`�[OL�ZPNUHSSLY� 9.:������
ZLX\LUJL VY�JYVZZPUN�RLLWLY�VY�[OL�[YHPU�JSLHYPUN�[OL�
JYVZZPUN��^OPJO�^P[OKYH^Z�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
WYV[LJ[PVU���HSSV^PUN�\ZLYZ�[V�JYVZZ�[OL�YHPS^H �̀
7OVUL[PJ�(SWOHIL[ (�SPZ[�VM�^VYKZ�\ZLK�PU�JVTT\UPJH[PVUZ�[V� *VSSPUZ�,UNSPZO�
YLWYLZLU[�[OL�SL[[LYZ�VM�[OL�HSWOHIL[��HZ�PU�,�MVY� +PJ[PVUHY`
,JOV�HUK�;�MVY�;HUNV�
7YV[LJ[LK��3*� /H]PUN�NH[LZ�VY�IHYYPLYZ�VY�OH]PUN�YVHK�[YHMÄJ� /:,������
ZPNUHSZ�VY�TPUPH[\YL�YLK�NYLLU�SPNO[Z�NP]PUN�H�
WVZP[P]L�^HYUPUN�VM�[OL�HWWYVHJO�VM�[YHPUZ�
9\ZO�OV\Y (�WLYPVK�H[�[OL�ILNPUUPUN�HUK�LUK�VM�[OL�^VYRPUN� *VSSPUZ�,UNSPZO�
KH`�^OLU�SHYNL�U\TILYZ�VM�WLVWSL�HYL�[YH]LSSPUN� +PJ[PVUHY`
[V�VY�MYVT�^VYR�
:PNUHSSLY (�JVTWL[LU[�WLYZVU�YLZWVUZPISL�MVY�[OL�VWLYH[PVU� 9.:������
VM�[OL�ZPNUHSSPUN�Z`Z[LT��[V�ZHMLS`�JVU[YVS�[OL�
WHZZHNL�HUK�YLN\SH[PVU�VM�[YHPUZ��\Z\HSS`�SVJH[LK�
PU�H�ZPNUHS�IV_�
;YHMÄJ�JHSTPUN� 9VHK�Q\UJ[PVU�Z��Z[YH[LNPJHSS`�WVZP[PVULK�[V� UH[PVUTHZ[LY�JVT
Z`Z[LT LUJV\YHNL�ZSV^LY�HUK�ZHMLY�KYP]PUN�ZWLLKZ�I`�
]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�
;`WL��VM�SL]LS� (�YLJVNUPZLK�JVTIPUH[PVU�VM�JVU[YVS�TLHZ\YLZ� 9.:������
JYVZZPUN� \ZLK�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��HWWYVWYPH[L�[V�WHY[PJ\SHY�
JPYJ\TZ[HUJLZ�
>PN�^HN�SPNO[ ���(�JVSSVX\PHS�[LYT�MVY�YVHK�[YHMÄJ�ZPNUHSZ���
���3PNO[�ZPNUHSZ�MVY�[OL�JVU[YVS�VM�[YHMÄJ�H[�SL]LS�
���9.:������
���;OL�;YHMÄJ�
JYVZZPUNZ���;OL�ZLX\LUJL�MVY�PSS\TPUH[PVU�����H��H� :PNU�9LN\SH[PVUZ�
ZPUNSL�Z[LHK`�HTILY�SPNO[��I��[^V�PU[LYTP[[LU[�YLK� �.LULYHS�
SPNO[Z� +PYLJ[PVUZ������
APNaHNNPUN :OHYW�HUN\SHY�TV]LTLU[Z�MYVT�VUL�ZPKL�[V� +(������
HUV[OLY���0U�[OL�JHZL�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��[V�TV]L�
HYV\UK�[OL�IHYYPLYZ�H[�H�OHSM�IHYYPLY�JYVZZPUN�[V�
H]VPK�OH]PUN�[V�^HP[��
xii
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
-PN\YL�� :JVWL�VM�^VYR�KP]PKLK�I`� [HZRZ�HUK�KLSP]LYHISLZ
� ����� ,QWURGXFWLRQ
��� �����������%DFNJURXQG
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3PTP[LK��+(��OHZ�WYLWHYLK�[OPZ�KVJ\TLU[�MVY�/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�
0UZWLJ[VYH[L��/490����;OPZ�YLWVY[�YLWYLZLU[Z�[OL�ÄYZ[�VM�[OYLL�KLSP]LYHISLZ�[V�IL�
WYVK\JLK�I`�+(�HZ�WHY[�VM�[OL�/490�WYVQLJ[�¶/HYHO�FURVVLQJV��)XWXUH�KXPDQ�IDFWRUV�
SULRULWLHV��QHZ�WHFKQRORJLHV�DQG�WRROV�IRU�LQVSHFWRUV·���
+(�WYVWVZLK�[OL�MVSSV^PUN�ZJVWL�VM�^VYR�[V�IL�KLSP]LYLK��IYVRLU�KV^U�PU[V�H�U\TILY�
VM�[HZRZ���;OPZ�KLSP]LYHISL�PZ�OPNOSPNO[LK�PU�VYHUNL��ÄN\YL������
��� �����������6FRSH
;OPZ�YLWVY[�PKLU[PÄLZ�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�HUK�Z\TTHYPZLZ�[OL�
ÄUKPUNZ�VM�[OL�SP[LYH[\YL�YL]PL^��ZP[L�]PZP[Z�HUK�[YHPUPUN�\UKLY[HRLU�I`�+(�HUK�[OL�
ÄUKPUNZ�MYVT�[OL�PU[LY]PL^Z�^P[O�Z[HRLOVSKLYZ���0[�HSZV�PUJS\KLZ�[OL�YLZ\S[Z�MYVT�[OL�
]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL�
��� �����������2EMHFWLYHV
;OL�VIQLJ[P]LZ�VM�[OPZ�YLWVY[�HYL�[V!
���� KLÄUL�H�SPZ[�VM�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�
���� Z\TTHYPZL�[OL�ÄUKPUNZ�MYVT�[OL�SP[LYH[\YL�YL]PL^��ZP[LZ�]PZP[Z�HUK�PU[LY]PL^Z��^OPJO�
Z\WWVY[�[OL�PKLU[PÄLK�PZZ\LZ�
���� ]HSPKH[L�H�TL[OVK�MVY�HZZPNUPUN�/-�PZZ\LZ�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��
���� JHW[\YL�ÄUKPUNZ�ZV�HZ�[V�Z\WWVY[�[OL�KL]LSVWTLU[�VM�[VVSZ�HUK�HWWYVHJOLZ�MVY�
0UZWLJ[VYZ��
1
� ����� 0HWKRG
��� �����������,QWURGXFWLRQ
;OL�MVSSV^PUN�ZLJ[PVU�IYPLÅ`�KLZJYPILZ�[OL�TL[OVKZ�LTWSV`LK�MVY�PKLU[PM`PUN�O\THU�
MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�MVY�PUJS\ZPVU�^P[OPU�[OL�KH[HIHZL���
��� �����������/LWHUDWXUH�UHYLHZ
(�YL]PL^�VM�RL`�SP[LYH[\YL�MYVT�YHPS��YVHK��\ZLY�YPZR�WLYJLW[PVU�HUK�ILOH]PV\Y�^HZ�
\UKLY[HRLU��\ZPUN�H�]HYPL[`�VM�ZLHYJO�TL[OVKZ���;OLZL�PUJS\KLK�\ZPUN�[OL�PU�OV\ZL�
JH[HSVN\L�HUK�QV\YUHS�ZLHYJO�MHJPSP[PLZ�VM�[OL�;YHUZWVY[�9LZLHYJO�3HIVYH[VY`�HUK�[OL�
)YP[PZO�3PIYHY �̀�
(�YL]PL^�VM�SP[LYH[\YL�^HZ�THKL�MYVT�[OL�MVSSV^PUN�ZV\YJLZ�HUK�YLZLHYJO�HYLHZ!
���� 9::)�YLZLHYJO
���� /490�PUJPKLU[�YLWVY[Z
���� 9::)�HUK�5L[^VYR�9HPS�:[HUKHYKZ� �.\PKHUJL�UV[LZ
���� ,YNVUVTPJZ�0UMVYTH[PVU�(UHS`ZPZ�*LU[YL��,0(*��
���� ;OL�ÄUKPUNZ�VM�YLZLHYJO�JVTTPZZPVULK�I`�5L[^VYR�9HPS
���� ;OL�ÄUKPUNZ�VM�YLZLHYJO�JVTTPZZPVULK�I`�/:,
���� ;OL�ÄUKPUNZ�VM�YLZLHYJO�JVTTPZZPVULK�I`�YVHK�[YHUZWVY[�IVKPLZ��L�N���;93
���� /\THU�ILOH]PV\Y��L�N��O\THU�LYYVY��YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y��O\THU�YLSPHIPSP[`
���� ;YLZWHZZ� �]HUKHSPZT�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ
���� ,\YVWLHU�HUK�^VYSK�^PKL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�YLZLHYJO�HUK�PUJPKLU[Z
��� �����������/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�YLVLWV�
;V�KH[L��H�[V[HS�VM����ZP[L�]PZP[Z�[V�RL`�L_HTWSLZ�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WLZ�OH]L�ILLU�
\UKLY[HRLU�[V�I\PSK�H�NYLH[LY�\UKLYZ[HUKPUN�VM�[OL�PZZ\LZ�ÄYZ[�OHUK���:[PSS�WOV[VNYHWOZ�
HUK�]PKLV�YLJVYKPUNZ�^LYL�[HRLU�H[�LHJO�VM�[OL�ZP[L�]PZP[Z���
7OV[VNYHWOZ�MYVT�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�]PZP[LK�JHU�IL�MV\UK�PU�(WWLUKP_�(���
;HISL�� 3L]LS�JYVZZPUN�]PZP[Z���:[VWWPUN�^HZ� UV[�WVZZPISL�H[�HSS�ZP[LZ�HUK�[OLZL� ^LYL�]PL^LK�]PH�H�]LOPJSL�ºKYP]L�I`»��� ;OLZL�HYL�THYRLK�^P[O�HU�HZ[LYPZR����� PU�[OL�[HISL�
1HDUHVW�7RZQ /HYHO�&URVVLQJ�1DPH /HYHO�&URVVLQJ�7\SH
)LKMVYK 2LTWZ[VU�/HYK^PJR�:[H[PVU ()*3
)LKMVYK 4PSSIYVVR�:[H[PVU 4*.
)LKMVYK :[L^HY[I`�)YPJR^VYRZ 7YP]H[L�.H[LRLLWLY
)LKMVYK :[L^HY[I`�.YLLU�3HUL�:[H[PVU 4*.
2
-PN\YL�� )LYY`�3HUL�\ZLY�^VYRLK�SL]LS� JYVZZPUN
-PN\YL�� 3VSOHT�)YPKNLZ�**;=�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN
-PN\YL�� :[��4HYNHYL[Z�:[H[PVU�**;=�SL]LS� JYVZZPUN
-PN\YL�� >HYL�MVV[WH[O�JYVZZPUN��H�
1HDUHVW�7RZQ /HYHO�&URVVLQJ�1DPH /HYHO�&URVVLQJ�7\SH
)LKMVYK >VV[[VU�)YVHKTLHK�:[H[PVU ()*3
+VUJHZ[LY (YRZL`� 4*)�**;=
+VUJHZ[LY *YL`RLZ <>*�4>3
+VUJHZ[LY +H^�3HUL� 4*)�**;=
+VUJHZ[LY +VJROPSSZ 4*)�**;=
+VUJHZ[LY ,NNIVYV\NO�0UNZ -VV[WH[O
+VUJHZ[LY -PLSKZ�3HUL (6*3
+VUJHZ[LY /LUZHSS 4*)��
+VUJHZ[LY 1VHU�*YVM[� 4*.
+VUJHZ[LY 2PY[VU�3HUL� 4*)�**;=
+VUJHZ[LY 4HYZO�3HUL -VV[WH[O�
+VUJHZ[LY 4VH[OPSSZ� 4*)�**;=
+VUJHZ[LY :UHP[O�9VHK� (/)
+VUJHZ[LY :UHP[O�:[H[PVU (6*3
+VUJHZ[LY :UHP[O� �7VU[LMYHJ[ (/)
+VUJHZ[LY :[HPUMVY[O�9VHK (/)
+VUJHZ[LY ;OVYWL (6*3
+VUJHZ[LY ;OVYUL�4VVYLUKZ� (/)
+VUJHZ[LY ;OVYWL�9VHK� (/)
+VUJHZ[LY >OP[SL` 4*)�**;=
/LY[MVYK 9V`KVU 4*)�**;=
/LY[MVYK :[��4HYNHYL[Z�:[H[PVU��MPN\YL��� 4*)�**;=
/LY[MVYK >HYL�:[H[PVU 4*)�**;=
/LY[MVYK >HYL��H����MPN\YL��� -VV[WH[O
/LY[MVYK >HYL��I� -VV[WH[O
4PKKSLZIYV\NO 3VUN�)LJR 4*)
4PKKSLZIYV\NO 9LKJHY�3HUL 4*)�**;=
4PKKSLZIYV\NO >LZ[ZPKL�9VHK 4*)�**;=
4PS[VU�2L`ULZ )LYY`�3HUL���MPN\YL��� <>*�;
4PS[VU�2L`ULZ )V^�)YPJROPSS�:[H[PVU 4*)�**;=
4PS[VU�2L`ULZ >VI\YU�:HUKZ� -VV[WH[O
4PS[VU�2L`ULZ >VI\YU�:HUKZ�:[H[PVU 4*)
4PS[VU�2L`ULZ 3LPNO[VU�)\aaHYK 5H[PVUHS�/LYP[HNL�9HPS^H`�
6WLU�*YVZZPUN
7L[LYIVYV\NO )HPU[VU�.YLLU� (/)
7L[LYIVYV\NO )HPU[VU�=PSSHNL (/)
7L[LYIVYV\NO )HSSHZ[�7P[Z <>*�;
7L[LYIVYV\NO -V_�*V]LY[�9VHK -VV[WH[O
7L[LYIVYV\NO .YLH[MVYK 4*)�**;=
3
7L[LYIVYV\NO /LSWZ[VU 4*)�
7L[LYIVYV\NO 3VSOHT�)YPKNLZ��ZLL�MPN\YL�� 4*)�**;=
7L[LYIVYV\NO 3VSOHT� -VV[WH[O
7L[LYIVYV\NO 4H_L` 4*)�**;=
7L[LYIVYV\NO ;HSSPUN[VU 4*)�**;=
7L[LYIVYV\NO >VVKJYVM[ 4HUULK�NH[LZ
-PN\YL�� 7L[LYIVYV\NO�ZPNUHS�IV_���;OL�SL]LS� JYVZZPUNZ�JVU[YVS�WHULS�PZ�WVZP[PVULK� ^P[O�]PL^Z�VM�[OL�THPU�WHULS��
��� ����� 6LJQDO�ER[�YLVLWV
=PZP[Z�^LYL�THKL�[V�7L[LYIVYV\NO�HUK�/LSWZ[VU�ZPNUHS�IV_LZ���([�LHJO�ZPNUHS�IV_��
[OL�WYVJLZZ�MVY�VWLYH[PUN�[OL�JSVZPUN�HUK�VWLUPUN�ZLX\LUJL�VM�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�^HZ�
VIZLY]LK�MVY�H�WLYPVK�VM�[PTL���0U�HKKP[PVU�[V�[OPZ��H�KL[HPSLK�L_WSHUH[PVU�VM�[OL�WYVJLZZ�
^HZ�WYV]PKLK�I`�[OL�ZPNUHSSLY�HZ�[OL`�WYVNYLZZLK�[OYV\NO�[OL�ZLX\LUJL�MVY�LHJO�
JYVZZPUN���
:PNUHSSLYZ�^LYL�HSZV�HZRLK�HIV\[�[OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�[OL�LX\PWTLU[�[V�KL[LJ[�VIQLJ[Z�
VU�[OL�JYVZZPUN�HUK�[OLPY�V^U�L_WLYPLUJLZ�VM�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�KPMMLYLU[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
\ZLYZ��
������������� 3HWHUERURXJK�
([�7L[LYIVYV\NO��ÄN\YL�����[OL�WHULSZ�HYL�HYYHUNLK�[V�JVU[YVS�[OL�TV]LTLU[�VM�[YHPUZ�
HZ�^LSS�HZ�MVY�TVUP[VYPUN�HUK�JVU[YVSSPUN�Ä]L�SVJHS�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���;^V�ZPNUHSSLYZ�
VWLYH[L�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�JVU[YVS�WHULS�H[�HSS�[PTLZ��HUK�[OLPY�WVZP[PVU�Z\WWVY[Z�
JVTT\UPJH[PVU�^P[O�HUK�H�]PL^�VM�[OL�^VYR�VM�V[OLY�ZPNUHSSLYZ�JVU[YVSSPUN�[OL�
TV]LTLU[Z�VM�[YHPUZ�]PH�[OL�THPU�JVU[YVS�WHULS����
-PN\YL�� -PN\YL�� -PN\YL� ;OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�JVU[YVS�WHULS� 4VUP[VYZ�MVY�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�HYL� ;OL�VYKLY�VM�[OL�JSVZPUN� TPTPJZ�[OL�VYKLY�VM�[OL�JYVZZPUNZ� WVZP[PVULK�KPYLJ[S`�HIV]L�[OL� WYVJLK\YL�JVU[YVS�I\[[VUZ� VU�[OL�YHPS�PUMYHZ[Y\J[\YL��� JYVZZPUN�VU�[OL�WHULS��� YLX\PYL�[OL�ZPNUHSSLY�[V�KV\ISL�
JOLJR�[OL�JYVZZPUN�PZ�JSLHY� WYPVY�[V�JVTWSL[PUN�[OL�JSVZPUN�
������������� +HOSVWRQ
/LSWZ[VU�ZPNUHS�IV_��ÄN\YL� ��PZ�H�KLKPJH[LK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�IV_���;^V�ZPNUHSSLYZ�JVU[YVS�
[OL�JSVZPUN�HUK�VWLUPUN�ZLX\LUJL�VM�MV\Y�**;=��VUL�THUULK�NH[L��HUK�[OL�/LSWZ[VU�
4*)�JYVZZPUN��WVZP[PVULK�VU�[OL�:[HTMVYK�HUK�VY�,HZ[�*VHZ[�THPUSPUL�[YHPU�YV\[LZ���
;OL�JVU[YVS�WHULS�TPTPJZ�[OL�VYKLY�VM�[OL�JYVZZPUNZ�VU�[OL�YHPS�PUMYHZ[Y\J[\YL�HUK�HSZV�
-PN\YL��� ZOV^Z�HU�HKKP[PVUHS�MV\Y�JYVZZPUNZ��UV[�JVU[YVSSLK�I`�[OL�ZPNUHSSLYZ��� /LSWZ[VU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�ZPNUHS�IV_���
4
-VSSV^PUN�[OL�ZPNUHS�IV_�]PZP[��IYPLM�]PZP[Z�^LYL�THKL�[V�ZP_�VM�[OL�JYVZZPUNZ�PU�[OL�
/LSWZ[VU�HYLH���
-PN\YL��� -PN\YL��� -PN\YL��� ;OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�JVU[YVS�WHULS� ;OL�]PL^�VM�[OL�/LSWZ[VU� ;OL�ZPNUHSSLYZ�YLJLP]L�JHSSZ� TPTPJZ�[OL�VYKLY�VM�[OL�JYVZZPUNZ� JYVZZPUN�MYVT�[OL�ZPNUHS�IV_� MYVT�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ��[YHJR�ZPKL� VU�[OL�YHPS�PUMYHZ[Y\J[\YL��� ^VYRLYZ�HUK�[OL�JYVZZPUN�RLLWLY�
H[�>VVKJYVM[���
��� �����������/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�WUDLQLQJ
+(�H[[LUKLK�[OL�/:,�[^V�KH`�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[YHPUPUN�JV\YZL��OLSK�PU�+VUJHZ[LY�PU�1\S`�
�������;OL�JV\YZL�JV]LYLK�[OL�MVSSV^PUN�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�PZZ\LZ!
���� )HZPJ�SLNPZSH[PVU
���� 5L[^VYR�9HPS»Z�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�YPZR�HZZLZZTLU[�WYVJLZZ
���� 3L]LS�JYVZZPUN�VYKLYZ
���� 5VYTHS�VWLYH[PVU�HUK�MHPS\YL�TVKLZ
���� 0U]LZ[PNH[PUN�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�HJJPKLU[Z
���� /:,�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�Z[YH[LN`�HUK�PU[LY]LU[PVU�WSHU
;OL�[^V�KH`�[YHPUPUN�JV\YZL�HSZV�PUJS\KLK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�]PZP[Z�PU�HUK�HYV\UK�[OL�
+VUJHZ[LY�HYLH����
��� �����������,QWHUYLHZV
3L]LS�JYVZZPUN�Z[HRLOVSKLYZ�^LYL�PU[LY]PL^LK�YLNHYKPUN�[OLPY�WHY[PJ\SHY�L_WLYPLUJL�
HUK�RUV^SLKNL�VM�JYVZZPUNZ�HUK�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y���(�JVTWSL[L�SPZ[�VM�HSS�Z[HRLOVSKLYZ�
PU[LY]PL^LK�JHU�IL�MV\UK�PU�[OL�º(JRUV^SLKNLTLU[Z»�ZLJ[PVU�H[�[OL�ILNPUUPUN�VM�[OPZ�
YLWVY[���
0U[LY]PL^Z�^LYL�JHYYPLK�V\[�H[�[OL�YLZWVUKLU[»Z�WSHJL�VM�^VYR�VY�V]LY�[OL�[LSLWOVUL���
0U[LY]PL^Z�SHZ[LK�IL[^LLU���HUK���OV\YZ���
,HJO�PU[LY]PL^LL�^HZ�WYV]PKLK�^P[O�HU�HNLUKH�HUK�SL[[LY�VM�H\[OVYP[`�WYPVY�[V�[OL�
TLL[PUN�VY�[LSLWOVUL�PU[LY]PL^�[HRPUN�WSHJL���,HJO�PU[LY]PL^�HNLUKH�MVSSV^LK�H�ZPTPSHY�
MVYTH[��OV^L]LY�[OL�X\LZ[PVUZ�^LYL�[HPSVYLK�[V�LHJO�YLZWVUKLU[»Z�HYLH�VM�L_WLY[PZL�
;OL�HNLUKH�MVYTH[�^HZ�HZ�MVSSV^Z!
5
���� 0U[YVK\J[PVU�[V�WYVQLJ[
���� 9VSL�VM�+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ
���� (PT�VM�WYVQLJ[�HUK�OV^�V\[W\[Z�MYVT�^VYR�^PSS�IL�HWWSPLK
���� 7LYZVUHS�L_WLYPLUJLZ�VM�VIZLY]PUN�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ
���� )LOH]PV\Y�WH[[LYUZ�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ
���� *OHYHJ[LYPZ[PJZ�VM�JYVZZPUNZ�VY�Z\YYV\UKPUN�LU]PYVUTLU[�[OH[�KV�UV[�Z\WWVY[�VY�
PUÅ\LUJL�[OL�^H`�[OL�\ZLY�ILOH]LZ��
+VJ\TLU[Z�WYV]PKLK�I`�ZVTL�VM�[OL�YLZWVUKLU[Z�[V�Z\WWVY[�[OLPY�JVTTLU[Z�^LYL�
MVY�PU[LYUHS�\ZL�VUS �̀��;OLYLMVYL�[OLZL�OH]L�ILLU�YLMLYLUJLK�HZ�HU�PU[LYUHS�KVJ\TLU[�
^P[OPU�[OL�KH[HIHZL��OV^L]LY�UV�YLMLYLUJLZ�[V�UHTLZ�VY�SVJH[PVUZ�JVU[HPULK�^P[OPU�
[OLZL�KVJ\TLU[Z�OH]L�ILLU�PUJS\KLK���
������������� ,QWHUYLHZ�ERXQGDULHV
;V�OLSW�KLÄUL�H�SPZ[�VM�Z\P[HISL�Z[HRLOVSKLYZ��IV[O�5L[^VYR�9HPS�HUK�/490�
YLJVTTLUKLK�H�JYVZZ�ZLJ[PVU�VM�PUKP]PK\HSZ�[V�Z\WWVY[�[OL�PU[LY]PL^�Z[HNL�VM�[OPZ�
WYVQLJ[���(S[OV\NO�[OLYL�HYL�THU`�TVYL�WV[LU[PHS�Z[HRLOVSKLYZ�^P[OPU�[OL�YHPS�PUK\Z[Y`�
^P[O�L_[LUZP]L�RUV^SLKNL�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��VUJL�JVTTVUHSP[PLZ�VM�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�
PZZ\LZ�^LYL�PKLU[PÄLK�IL[^LLU�PUKP]PK\HSZ�[OPZ�^HZ�[HRLU�HZ�[OL�WVPU[�H[�^OPJO�
HKKP[PVUHS�Z[HRLOVSKLYZ�^LYL�UV[�PUJS\KLK�
�
6
� ����� 'DWDEDVH
��� �����������5HFRUGLQJ�WKH�ÀQGLQJV�
;OL�ÄUKPUNZ�^LYL�YLJVYKLK�PU�H�KH[HIHZL��JYLH[LK�I`�+(�MVY�[OL�W\YWVZL�VM�[OPZ�
WYVQLJ[����(�KH[HIHZL�^HZ�\ZLK�HZ�[OL�TVZ[�LMÄJPLU[�^H`�VM�YLJVYKPUN�[OL�O\THU�
MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�ILJH\ZL!
���� [OL�ÄUKPUNZ�^LYL�UV[�ULJLZZHYPS`�\UPX\L�[V�VUL�WPLJL�VM�YLZLHYJO�VY�YLZWVUKLU[�
HUK�[OL�KH[HIHZL�HSSV^LK�[OPZ�[V�IL�JVU]L`LK�LHZPS`�HUK�^P[OV\[�K\WSPJH[PVU"��
���� [OL�KH[HIHZL�HSSV^LK�PKLU[PÄJH[PVU�VM�THU`�]HYPHISLZ�HZZVJPH[LK�^P[O�H�ZPUNSL�
PZZ\L��Z\JO�HZ�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WL�VY�[OL�ZWLJPÄJ�\ZLY"�
���� [OL�KH[HIHZL�^PSS�IL�[OL�WYPTHY`�ZV\YJL�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�MVY�KL]LSVWPUN�;HZR����
º0UZWLJ[VYZ»�[VVSZ�HUK�HWWYVHJOLZ»���;OPZ�^PSS�HSSV^�[OL�KL]LSVWLK�[VVSZ�HUK�
HWWYVHJOLZ�[V�IL�[YHJLHISL�[V�H�ZV\YJL�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU"�HUK�
���� [OL�KH[HIHZL�HSSV^Z�MVY�LHZ`�ZLHYJOLZ�[V�IL�THKL�VM�P[Z�JVU[LU[Z��I`�JOVVZPUN�
[OL�YLX\PYLK�KH[H�LU[Y`�ÄLSKZ��L�N���SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WL�VY�\ZLY�KL[HPSZ��VY�\ZPUN�
RL`^VYKZ�MVY�L_[YHJ[PUN�[OL�YLSL]HU[�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ���(�SPZ[PUN�VM�PKLU[PÄLK�
/-�PZZ\LZ�I`�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WL�OHZ�ILLU�JVTWPSLK�PU�(WWLUKP_�)���;OPZ�ZLHYJO�
M\UJ[PVU�^PSS�HSZV�Z\WWVY[�[OL�KL]LSVWTLU[�VM�0UZWLJ[VYZ�[VVSZ�HUK�HWWYVHJOLZ��
,HJO�KH[HIHZL�LU[Y`�OHZ�H�ZL[�VM�KH[H�ÄLSKZ��HSSV^PUN�H�YHUNL�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�[V�IL�
YLJVYKLK�HNHPUZ[�LHJO�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\L���;HISL���KLZJYPILZ�[OL�[`WL�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�
YLJVYKLK�PU�LHJO�KH[H�LU[Y`�ÄLSK�
;HISL�� ;OL�[`WL�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU� YLJVYKLK�PU�LHJO�KH[H�LU[Y`� ÄLSK�
+H[H�LU[Y`�ÄLSK 0UMVYTH[PVU�YLJVYKLK
5HI� (�\UPX\L�U\TILY�MVY�LHJO�KH[HIHZL�LU[Y �̀
&UHDWLRQ�GDWH��/DVW�0RGLÀHG�
GDWH -VY�LMMLJ[P]L�THUHNLTLU[�VM�KH[H�PUW\[�HUK�
JOHUNLZ�
,VVXH )YPLM�[P[SL�VM�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\L��
/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�W\SH 0KLU[PÄLZ�[OL�[`WL�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�^OPJO�HYL�
YLSL]HU[�[V�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\L�
8VHU�GHWDLOV 0KLU[PÄLZ�[OL�\ZLYZ�^OPJO�HYL�YLSL]HU[�[V�[OL�
O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\L�
,VVXH�DW�D�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ (U�L_HTWSL�VM�[OL�PKLU[PÄLK�PZZ\L�H[�H�<2�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUN���
'HVFULSWLRQ�RI�LVVXH� (�JVUJPZL�KLZJYPW[PVU�VM�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\L���
8VHU�EHKDYLRXU 0KLU[PÄLZ�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ�
HZ�H�YLZ\S[�VM�[OL�PZZ\L���
6RXUFHV�RI�LQIRUPDWLRQ 0KLU[PÄLZ�[OL�ZV\YJL�Z��VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�MVY�LHJO�
PZZ\L�
)DLOXUH�W\SH 0KLU[PÄLZ�[OL�[`WL�VM�MHPS\YL�JVTTP[[LK�I`�[OL�
\ZLY�HZ�H�YLZ\S[�VM�[OL�PZZ\L���:LL�ZLJ[PVU�������MVY�
M\Y[OLY�JSHYPÄJH[PVU�
7
-PN\YL��� 3L]LS JYVZZPUNZ! JVTT\UPJH[PVU HUK \ZLY ILOH]PV\Y PZZ\LZ 9LM *YLH[PVU KH[L 3HZ[ TVKPMPLK (�ISHUR�KH[HIHZL�LU[Y �̀�7SLHZL� ,VVXH
YLMLY�[V�WHNL���MVY�JSHYPÄJH[PVU� VM�LHJO�HIIYL]PH[PVU� �� /HYHO &URVVLQJ W\SH
����3URWHFWHG ����8QSURWHFWHG
(/) ()*3 (6*9 (6*3 <>*�4>3 :-?���4>3
4*. 4*) 4*)�**;= <UKLMPULK
<>* <>*�;
6* -*
)> <UKLMPULK
� (JJVT� � 6JJ\W�
7LKLZ[YPHU 3HUKV^ULY *`JSPZ[
/.=�KYP]LY
4V[VYJ`JSPZ[ 7HZZLUNLY /VYZLYPKLY
6[OLY <UKLMPULK
����/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�XVHU�W\SH
���� ����� ����� ����� ����� �����
��� <UKLMPULK
����$JH ��
0UKP]PK\HS .YV\W <UKLMPULK
����2Q�RZQ
*HY KYP]LY =HU KYP]LY
;YHPU KYP]LY
8VHU GHWDLOV
�� 'HVFULSWLRQ RI LVVXH � GHVLJQ IHDWXUH
�� 8VHU EHKDYLRXU
�,VVXH�DW�D�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ
�� (UURU W\SH
,YYVY =PVSH[PVU
�� 6RXUFHV RI LQIRUPDWLRQ ����,QWHUYLHZ�VRXUFH ����/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�YLVLW���DUHDV ����'RFXPHQW�VRXUFH ����'RFXPHQW�GHWDLOV
9(03�05+<:;9@
9::) /:,�/490 97* );7
96(+�05+<:;9@ ((
6;/,9:
9(03�05+<:;9@ /:,�/490
9::)
6[OLYZ
.6=,954,5; +M;��YHPS� +M;��YVHK�
6;/,9 ;93��YHPS� ;93��YVHK� 0UKLWLUKLU[ 5VU�<2
+VUJHZ[LY /LY[MVYK 7L[LYIVYV\NO )LKMVYK 9LKJHY
5L[^VYR 9HPS
)\Z KYP]LYZ 5L[^VYR 9HPS
9HPS^H` .: 6[OLY KLW[�
4PS[VU 2L`ULZ
��� �����������'DWDEDVH�FRQWHQW
������������� 6RXUFHV�RI�LQIRUPDWLRQ
,HJO�KH[HIHZL�LU[Y`�PUKPJH[LZ�[OL�ZV\YJLZ�VM�[OL�PUMVYTH[PVU���>OLYL�H�YLMLYLUJL�
[V�H�WHY[PJ\SHY�WPLJL�VM�YLZLHYJO�OHZ�ILLU�THKL�PU�[OL�º<ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y»�ZLJ[PVU��[OL�
KVJ\TLU[�JVKL�JHU�IL�MV\UK�PU�ZLJ[PVU�º����+VJ\TLU[�KL[HPSZ»���(U�L_WSHUH[PVU�VM�OV^�
[OL�JVKPUN�HWWSPLZ�HUK�[OL�SPZ[�VM�YLMLYLUJLZ�P[�YLMLYZ�[V�HYL�WYV]PKLK�VU�WHNL� ��VM�[OPZ�
YLWVY[�
������������� 8VHU�IDLOXUH�FODVVLÀFDWLRQ
;OL�KH[HIHZL�OHZ�H�KH[H�LU[Y`�ÄLSK�MVY�[OL�[`WL�VM�MHPS\YL�JVTTP[[LK�I`�[OL�\ZLY�HZ�
H�YLZ\S[�VM�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\L���;OPZ�O\THU�MHPS\YL�OHZ�ILLU�JSHZZPÄLK�PU[V�[^V�
LYYVY�TVKLZ���º,YYVY»�HUK�º=PVSH[PVU»��BYL�O\D� �B/:,�YLD���)V[O�º,YYVYZ»�HUK�º=PVSH[PVUZ»�
HYL�UVYTHSS`�Z\IKP]PKLK�[V�PKLU[PM`�[OL�\ZLYZ�WYLJLLKPUN�JVNUP[P]L�WYVJLZZLZZ���-VY�
[OL�W\YWVZLZ�VM�[OPZ�YLWVY[�H�ZPTWSL�LYYVY�JSHZZPÄJH[PVU�OHZ�ILLU�\ZLK��ILJH\ZL�P[�OHZ�
UV[�ILLU�^P[OPU�[OL�ZJVWL�VM�[OL�YLWVY[�[V�HUHS`ZL�[OL�KL[HPSLK�JVNUP[P]L�TLJOHUPZTZ�
PU]VS]LK�PU�LHJO�VM�[OL�O\THU�ILOH]PV\YZ�MVY�HSS�/-�PZZ\LZ���
;OL�O\THU�MHPS\YL�[`WLZ�OH]L�ILLU�KLÄULK�HZ�MVSSV^Z!
���� º,YYVY»�PZ�HU�\UPU[LU[PVUHS�HJ[�I`�H�\ZLY��OV^L]LY�P[�KL]PH[LZ�MYVT�[OL�JVYYLJ[�\ZLY�
ILOH]PV\Y���-VY�L_HTWSL��WVVYS`�^YP[[LU�ZPNUHNL�PUMVYTH[PVU�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�[OL�\ZLY�
TPZPU[LYWYL[PUN�[OL�PUZ[Y\J[PVUZ�HUK�\UKLY[HRPUN�[OL�PUJVYYLJ[�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YL��
���� º=PVSH[PVU»�YLMLYZ�[V�HU�PU[LU[PVUHS�HJ[�VU�ILOHSM�VM�[OL�\ZLY���;OL�\ZLY�RUV^PUNS`�
\UKLY[HRLZ�H�WHY[PJ\SHY�ILOH]PV\Y��[OH[�KL]PH[LZ�MYVT�[OL�JVYYLJ[�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y���
-VY�L_HTWSL��[OL�\ZLY�KVLZ�UV[�^HU[�[V�IL�OLSK�H[�[OL�JYVZZPUN�HUK�[OLYLMVYL�[OL`�
JOVVZL�[V�WHZZ�[OYV\NO�[OL�HJ[P]H[LK�^HYUPUN�PUMVYTH[PVU���
0KLU[PÄ`PUN�[OL�[`WL�VM�\ZLY�LYYVY�JVTTP[[LK�HZ�H�YLZ\S[�VM�[OL�/-�PZZ\L�^PSS�Z\WWVY[�
[OL�JVYYLJ[�HWWSPJH[PVU�VM�TLHZ\YLZ�[V�OLSW�JVU[YVS�[OL�SL]LS�VM�YPZR�H[�[OL�JYVZZPUN���
8
=PVSH[PVU�ILOH]PV\Y�PZ�HKKYLZZLK�[OYV\NO�LTWOHZPZPUN�[OL�JVUZLX\LUJLZ��^OPSL�ZSPWZ��
SHWZLZ�HUK�TPZ[HRLZ�HYL�HKKYLZZLK�I`�KLZPNUPUN�V\[�[OL�YLHZVU�MVY�[OL�LYYVY���
��� �����������$GGLWLRQDO�LQIRUPDWLRQ
;V�THPU[HPU�H�\ZLHISL�KH[HIHZL��VUS`�PUMVYTH[PVU�VU�[OL�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y��P�L���[OL�\ZLY»Z�
HJ[PVUZ��[OH[�PZ�H�KPYLJ[�YLZ\S[�VM�[OL�PKLU[PÄLK�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\L�OH]L�ILLU�PUJS\KLK���
+L[HPSLK�ÄUKPUNZ�[OH[�KLZJYPIL�[OL�\UKLYS`PUN�[OLVYPLZ�ILOPUK�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y�HUK�YPZR�
WLYJLW[PVU�HYL�YLJVYKLK�ZLWHYH[LS`�VM�[OL�KH[HIHZL�PU�ZLJ[PVU�����
9
� ����� )LQGLQJV
��� �����������6XPPDU\�RI�NH\�OLWHUDWXUH�LQIRUPDWLRQ
(�[V[HS�VM�����KVJ\TLU[Z�^LYL�YL]PL^LK�HZ�WHY[�VM�;HZR����3P[LYH[\YL�YL]PL^���(�
JVTWSL[L�SPZ[�VM�[OLZL�HYL�WYV]PKLK�PU�[OL�YLMLYLUJLZ�ZLJ[PVU�VM�[OPZ�YLWVY[�
6M�WHY[PJ\SHY�UV[L�HYL�[OL�MVSSV^PUN�KVJ\TLU[Z��^OPJO�WYV]PKL�HU�V]LY]PL^�VM�[OL�YHUNL�
VM�SP[LYH[\YL�YL]PL^LK�
��9HPS^H`�:HML[`�7YPUJPWSLZ�HUK�.\PKHUJL��WHY[����ZLJ[PVU�,!�.\PKHUJL�VU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�
�/:�.��������B/:,�YHD
;OL�9:7.�WYV]PKLZ�N\PKHUJL�HUK�HK]PJL�[V�[OVZL�WLYZVUZ�PU]VS]LK�PU�[OL�WYV]PZPVU�
HUK�THPU[LUHUJL�VM�[OL�WYV[LJ[PVU�HYYHUNLTLU[Z�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���0[�PZ�HSZV�H�
ILUJOTHYR�MVY�JVTWSPHUJL�I`�[OL�0UZWLJ[VYH[L���;OL�N\PKHUJL�IVVR�KL[HPSZ�[OL�
JVUKP[PVUZ�VM�Z\P[HIPSP[`�MVY�WHY[PJ\SHY�[`WLZ�VM�JYVZZPUNZ�[V�[OL�NLULYHS�KLZJYPW[PVU��
TL[OVK�VM�VWLYH[PVU��YHPS^H`�ZPNUHSSPUN�HUK�JVU[YVS�MVY�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�[`WL���0[�HSZV�
WYV]PKLZ�H�KPHNYHT�ZOV^PUN�[OL�[`WPJHS�SH`V\[�MVY�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�[`WL��
��9LX\PYLTLU[Z�MVY�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��PZZ\L���B.0�9;����D
;OL�9HPS^H`�.YV\W�:[HUKHYK�THUKH[LZ�[OL�YLX\PYLTLU[Z�MVY�HSS�HZWLJ[Z�VM�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUNZ��PUJS\KPUN�[OL�KLZPNU��JVUZ[Y\J[PVU��PUZWLJ[PVU��THPU[LUHUJL��VWLYH[PVU�
HUK�KLJVTTPZZPVUPUN��MVY�HSS�9HPS^H`�.YV\W�TLTILYZ���;OPZ�KVJ\TLU[�Z\WLYJLKLZ�
���ZLWHYH[L�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�9.7�KVJ\TLU[Z��HUK�WYV]PKLZ�H�JVTWSL[L�SPZ[PUN�VM�[OL�
JYVZZPUN�JVU[YVS�TLHZ\YLZ���
��7YV]PZPVU��YPZR�HZZLZZTLU[�HUK�YL]PL^�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��PZZ\L���B.0�9;����D
��.\PKHUJL�VU�WYV]PZPVU��YPZR�HZZLZZTLU[�HUK�YL]PL^�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�B.0�.5����D
;OL�N\PKHUJL�UV[L�MVY�9HPS^H`�.YV\W�:[HUKHYK�.0�9;������KL[HPSZ�MHJ[VYZ�[V�IL�
PUJS\KLK�HZ�WHY[�VM�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�YPZR�HZZLZZTLU[���:VTL�VM�[OL�MHJ[VYZ�PKLU[PÄLK�
HYL�ZPTPSHY�[V�[OVZL�^P[OPU�[OL�/-�PZZ\LZ�KH[HIHZL��OV^L]LY��[OL`�KV�UV[�KL[HPS�[OL�
ILOH]PV\YHS�[YHP[Z�VM�\ZLYZ�HZ�H�YLZ\S[�VM�[OL�PKLU[PÄLK�MHJ[VYZ��
��+L[LYTPUPUN�[OL�ÄUHS�KLJPZPVU�WVPU[�H[�\ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUNZ�BO\�KLD
��/\THU�-HJ[VYZ�HZZLZZTLU[�VM�[OL�YPZRZ�HZZVJPH[LK�^P[O�4>3�JYVZZPUNZ�BO\�O\D
;OPZ�YLZLHYJO�^HZ�JHYYPLK�V\[�I`�/\THU�,UNPULLYPUN��VU�ILOHSM�VM�9::)���;OL�
YLZLHYJO�KL[HPSZ�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�\ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUNZ��HUK�KYH^Z�JVUJS\ZPVUZ�
VU�YPZR�WLYJLW[PVU�VM�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ�HUK�[OL�YLHZVUZ�MVY�\ZLY�]PVSH[PVUZ���;OLZL�
KVJ\TLU[Z�WYV]PKL�H�ZV\YJL�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�MVY�[OL�[`WLZ�VM�LYYVYZ�JVTTP[[LK�I`�\ZLYZ�
HUK�TH`�Z\WWVY[�[OL�HWWYVWYPH[L�ZLSLJ[PVU�VM�YPZR�JVU[YVS�TLHZ\YLZ���
��9VHK�]LOPJSL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�ZWLJPHS�[VWPJ�YLWVY[�BYZZI�YVD
;OPZ�YLWVY[�WYV]PKLZ�H�KL[HPSLK�YL]PL^�VM�[OL�U\TILYZ�VM�KPMMLYLU[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WLZ�
HUK�[OL�U\TILYZ�VM�PUJPKLU[Z�PU]VS]PUN�YVHK�]LOPJSLZ�HUK�[YHPUZ�H[�JYVZZPUNZ���0[�HSZV�
PKLU[PÄLZ�[OL�OPNO�SL]LS�JH\ZLZ�VM�JVSSPZPVU�YPZR��VM�^OPJO�YVHK�]LOPJSL�KYP]LY�LYYVY�PZ�
10
[OL�TVZ[�JVTTVU�JH\ZL�HUK�]PVSH[PVUZ�[OL�ZLJVUK�TVZ[�JVTTVU���;OPZ�YLWVY[�KPMMLYZ�
MYVT�[OL�YVHK�]LOPJSL�YLWVY[��PU�[OH[�P[�WYV]PKLZ�PUMVYTH[PVU�HIV\[�KL[HPSLK�O\THU�
MHJ[VY�PZZ\LZ�[OH[�JHU�SLHK�[V�PUJPKLU[Z�H[�HSS�[`WLZ�VM�JYVZZPUNZ�
��9LK\JPUN�LYYVY�HUK�PUÅ\LUJPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�B/:,�YLD
;OPZ�KVJ\TLU[�N\PKLZ�[OVZL�^P[O�YLZWVUZPIPSPP[LZ�MVY�^VYRWSHJL�OLHS[O�HUK�ZHML[`�
[V�JVUZPKLY�[OL�ILULÄ[Z�VM�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ���0[�KLÄULZ�[OL�PTWHJ[�VM�O\THU�LYYVY�HUK�
ILOH]PV\Y�VU�OLHS[O�HUK�ZHML[ �̀�[OL�[`WLZ�VM�O\THU�LYYVY�HUK�TL[OVKZ�MVY�YLK\JPUN�
[OLT�HUK�[OL�PTWYV]LTLU[�VM�OLHS[O�HUK�ZHML[`�[OYV\NO�HWWYVWYPH[L�HWWSPJH[PVU�VM�
[HZRZ��LX\PWTLU[��WYVJLK\YLZ�HUK�^HYUPUNZ�
4HU`�VM�[OL�KVJ\TLU[Z�YL]PL^LK�WYV]PKLK�\ZLM\S�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PUMVYTH[PVU��`L[�MVJ\Z�
VU�SPTP[LK�JYVZZPUN�[`WLZ�VY�\ZLYZ���;OPZ�YLWVY[�IYPUNZ�[VNL[OLY�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�
PUMVYTH[PVU�MYVT�HSS�[OL�YLMLYLUJLZ�YL]PL^LK�
��� �����������6XPPDU\�RI�PDLQ�GDWDEDVH�ÀQGLQJV
)LSV^�PZ�H�Z\TTHY`�VM�[OL�THPU�ÄUKPUNZ�MYVT�[OL�KH[HIHZL���
���� ;V�KH[L������O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�OH]L�ILLU�KLÄULK�
���� ��O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�YLSH[L�[V�WYV[LJ[LK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�
���� ���PZZ\LZ�YLSH[L�[V�\UWYV[LJ[LK�JYVZZPUNZ�
���� ;OL�ZPNUHSSLY�PZ�YLMLYYLK�[V�^P[OPU���VM�[OL�PZZ\LZ��^P[O�YLNHYK�[V"�JVTT\UPJH[PVU�
�������JVU[HJ[PUN�������KL[LJ[PVU�VM�VIQLJ[Z�������HUK�[YHJR�ZPKL�^VYRLYZ�� ���JHTLYH�
HUNSL������HUK�ZPNUHS�ZLJ[PVUZ������
���� .YV\WZ�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ�OH]L�ILLU�PKLU[PÄLK�HZ�PTWHJ[PUN�VU���VM�[OL�O\THU�
MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ���;OLZL�YLMLY�[V"�NYV\WZ�PU�NLULYHS�������WVZP[PVU�VM�ZHML[`�������
WLKLZ[YPHUZ�VU�]LOPJ\SHY�JYVZZPUNZ�������WHZZLUNLY�JVTWSPHUJL�^P[O�4>3�������
[YLZWHZZLYZ�� ���HUK�^HSRLYZ�PU�NYV\WZ���������
���� 6M�WHY[PJ\SHY�UV[L��WLKLZ[YPHU�\ZLYZ�HYL�HMMLJ[LK�I`�VUS`�� �PZZ\LZ��^OPSL�]LOPJSL�
KYP]LYZ��JHYZ��]HUZ��/.=Z� �TV[VYJ`JSPZ[Z��HYL�HMMLJ[LK�I`����O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�
���� ���O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�YLSH[L�[V�\ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUNZ��PUJS\KPUN�[OVZL�^P[O�
[LSLWOVULZ�VY�TPUPH[\YL�^HYUPUN�SPNO[Z���
���� (\[VTH[PJ�VWLU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�HYL�HMMLJ[LK�I`����VM�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�
��� �����������5HFXUULQJ�+)�WKHPHV
(�YHUNL�VM�YLJ\YYPUN�/-�[OLTLZ�OH]L�ILLU�PKLU[PÄLK�MYVT�[OL�KH[HIHZL���;OLZL�[OLTLZ�
IYPLÅ`�KLZJYPIL�[OL�YLHZVUZ�MVY�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\YZ�HZ�H�YLZ\S[�VM�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�
PZZ\LZ���
������������� &RPSHWHQFH
*VTWL[LUJL�[OLTL�L_WSHPUZ�[OL�ILOH]PV\YZ�VM�\ZLYZ�HZ�H�YLZ\S[�VM�[OL�\ZLY�UV[�ILPUN�
11
H^HYL�VM�VY�MHPSPUN�[V�M\SS`�\UKLYZ[HUK�[OL�JVYYLJ[�Y\SLZ�HUK�WYVJLK\YLZ�MVY�\ZPUN�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUNZ���(U�L_HTWSL�VM�H�KH[HIHZL�PZZ\L�^OPJO�KLTVUZ[YH[LZ�[OPZ�JVTWL[LUJL�
[OLTL��PZ�PZZ\L���!�/PNO^H`�*VKL!�[OL�OPNO^H`�JVKL�J\YYLU[S`�JVU[HPUZ�����Y\SLZ�MVY�
]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ���+\L�[V�[OL�J\YYLU[�TL[OVK�MVY�SLHYUPUN�[OL�JVKL�HUK�P[Z�KLW[O�HUK�
JVTWSL_P[`�VM�SLNHS�YLX\PYLTLU[Z��UV[�HSS�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�HYL�M\SS`�H^HYL�VM�[OL�L_HJ[�
WYVJLK\YLZ�MVY�YLZWVUKPUN�JVYYLJ[S`�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ����
;OL�JVTWL[LUJL�[OLTL�KPMMLYZ�MYVT�JVTWSPHUJL��^OPJO�PZ�HKKYLZZLK�M\SS`�PU�ZLJ[PVU�
��������*VTWSPHUJL�PZ�HZZVJPH[LK�^P[O�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y�[OH[�YLZ\S[Z�MYVT�ILPUN�H^HYL�
VM�[OL�Y\SLZ�HUK�WYVJLK\YLZ�MVY�JVYYLJ[S`�\ZPUN�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��OV^L]LY�JOVVZPUN�UV[�
[V�JVTWS`�^P[O�[OLZL�SLNHS�YLX\PYLTLU[Z�MVY�]HYPV\Z�YLHZVUZ��MVY�L_HTWSL��WHZZPUN�
[OYV\NO�[OL�HJ[P]H[LK�^HYUPUN�Z`Z[LT�ZV�HZ�[V�H]VPK�OH]PUN�[V�^HP[��
������������� 'LVWUDFWLRQ
+PZ[YHJ[PVU�OHZ�HSZV�ILLU�PKLU[PÄLK�HZ�H�/-�[OLTL�[OYV\NOV\[�[OL�KH[HIHZL���(U�
L_HTWSL�/-�PZZ\L�� �!�5VPZL!�UVPZ`�Z\YYV\UKPUNZ�TH`�PTWHPY�[OL�WLMVYTHUJL�VM�[OL�
\ZLYZ�[V�KL[LJ[�[YHPUZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���5VPZ`�Z\YYV\UKPUNZ�JSVZL�[V�[OL�JYVZZPUN�JHU�
KPZ[YHJ[�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLY�MYVT�HZZLZZPUN�MVY�[OL�WYLZLUJL�VM�H�[YHPU��
������������� ,QDGHTXDWH�GHVLJQ�
0U�THU`�HYLHZ�VM�[OL�<2��SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�OH]L�ILLU�LZ[HISPZOLK�MVY�ZVTL�[PTL���;OL�
KL]LSVWTLU[�VM�HYLHZ�[V�PUJS\KL�TVYL�OVTLZ�HUK�SHYNLY�YVHK�PUMYHZ[Y\J[\YLZ�OHZ�ILLU�
HJJVTTVKH[LK�[OYV\NO�JOHUNLZ�[V�[OL�SL]LS�VM�WYV[LJ[PVU�H[�JYVZZPUNZ���/V^L]LY��[OL�
JVU[PU\LK�PUJYLHZLZ�PU�KL]LSVWTLU[�^PSS�TLHU�[OH[�H[�ZVTL�WVPU[�[OL�L_[LU[�VM�JOHUNL�
[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�WYV[LJ[PVU�PZ�PUHKLX\H[L�HUK�\UHISL�[V�RLLW�WHJL��
;OL�PUHKLX\HJ`�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�KLZPNU�PZ�H�MLH[\YL�VM�ZVTL�VM�[OL�/-�PZZ\LZ���-VY�
L_HTWSL��PZZ\L���!�/V\ZPUN�KL]LSVWTLU[Z!�PUJYLHZLZ�YVHK�[YHMÄJ�HUK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
\ZL���
������������� %HKDYLRXU�DULVLQJ�IURP�ULVN�
(U�V\[SPUL�VM�LHJO�[`WL�VM�YPZR�ILOH]PV\Y�PZ�WYV]PKLK�^P[O�H�Z\TTHY`�VM�Z\WWVY[PUN�YPZR�
WLYJLW[PVU�YLZLHYJO��^OPJO�MYHTLZ�[OL�IHJRNYV\UK�[V�[OL�YLZ\S[HU[�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\YZ�
^P[OPU�[OL�KH[HIHZL����
;OL�/:,�KVJ\TLU[��º9LK\JPUN�LYYVY�HUK�PUÅ\LUJPUN�ILOH]PV\Y»�B/:,�YLD�WYV]PKLZ�
WYHJ[PJHS�N\PKHUJL�[V�THU`�VM�[OL�MVSSV^PUN�YPZR�[OLTLZ���
������������ ;̀ WL�VM�YPZRZ
9PZRZ�JHU�IL�L_WLYPLUJLK�[OYV\NO�H�WO`ZPJHS�VY�WZ`JOVSVNPJHS�^H �̀��(�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
\ZLY�TH`�L_WLYPLUJL�H�WO`ZPJHS�YPZR�[OYV\NO�[OL�WV[LU[PHS�VM�ILPUN�OP[�I`�H�[YHPU���(�
WZ`JOVSVNPJHS�YPZR�TH`�IL�L_WLYPLUJLK�[OYV\NO�[OL�WV[LU[PHS�VM�ILPUN�JH\NO[�I`�[OL�
WVSPJL�MVY�WHZZPUN�[OYV\NO�[OL�HJ[P]H[LK�^HYUPUN�SPNO[Z�
������������ 0UKP]PK\HS�WLYJLP]LK�JVU[YVS
7LVWSL�HKVW[�[OLPY�V^U�SL]LSZ�VM�YPZR�VYPLU[H[PVU��HUK�[OLZL�HYL�NLULYHSS`�KLÄULK�I`�[OL�
MVSSV^PUN�MHJ[VYZ!
12
� ��� (U�PUKP]PK\HS»Z�V^U�WLYZVUHSP[`�JOHYHJ[LYPZ[PJZ���;OVZL�[OH[�ZLLR�V\[�YPZR�HYL�
VM[LU�YLMLYYLK�[V�HZ�ZLUZH[PVU�ZLLRLYZ�HUK�OH]L�H�ULLK�MVY�T\JO�OPNOLY�SL]LSZ�VM�
Z[PT\SH[PVU��^L�YP� �HK�YP��
� ��� �;OL�ZVJPHS�HMMLJ[�VU�H�WLYZVU»Z�ILOH]PV\Y��L�N���[OYV\NO�HWWYV]HS�VY�KPZHWWYV]HS�I`�
V[OLYZ�
� ��� ;OLPY�V^U�SVJ\Z�VM�JVU[YVS��^OPJO�KL[LYTPULZ�OV^�PU�JVU[YVS�HU�PUKP]PK\HS�MLLSZ�
HIV\[�[OLPY�V^U�ILOH]PV\Y��I\�YP��
;OL�SL]LS�VM�WLYJLP]LK�YPZR�JHU�JOHUNL�KLWLUKLU[�\WVU�[OL�\ZLY»Z�ZP[\H[PVU���=PVSH[PVUZ�
JHU�IL�L_WSHPULK�I`�HU�\UKLYZ[HUKPUN�VM�OV^�WLVWSL�HZZLZZ�[OL�WLYJLP]LK�YPZRZ���-VY�
L_HTWSL��/-�PZZ\L���!�;PTL�VM�KH`!�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�
K\YPUN�Y\ZO�OV\YZ��H[�TPKKH`�HUK�H[�[OL�ILNPUUPUN�HUK�LUK�VM�[OL�ZJOVVS�KH �̀��(�
]LOPJSL�KYP]LY�JHSJ\SH[LZ�[OL�WLYJLP]LK�YPZR�VM�JYVZZPUN�PSSLNHSS`�^OLU�OH]PUN�[V�^HP[�
H[�[OL�JYVZZPUN��JVTWHYLK�^P[O�[OL�YPZRZ�VM�V[OLY�[OPUNZ��Z\JO�HZ�ILPUN�SH[L�MVY�HU�
HWWVPU[TLU[���;OL�ILULÄ[�VM�JYVZZPUN�PSSLNHSS`�PZ�VI]PV\Z�[V�[OL�KYP]LY"�UV[�OH]PUN�
[V�^HP[�H[�[OL�JYVZZPUN�HUK�YLHJOPUN�[OLPY�KLZPYLK�KLZ[PUH[PVU�VU�[PTL���0M�[OPZ�YPZR�
V\[^LPNOZ�[OLPY�HZZLZZTLU[�VM�[OL�WV[LU[PHS�JVZ[Z�VM�ILPUN�OP[�I`�[YHPU��[OLU�[OL�\ZLY�PZ�
SPRLS`�[V�JYVZZ�����
������������ 9PZR�JVTWLUZH[PVU
7LVWSL�YLZWVUK�[V�VY�JVTWLUZH[L�MVY�WLYJLP]LK�JOHUNLZ�PU�[OL�KHUNLYZ�[V�^OPJO�
[OL`�HYL�L_WVZLK��I`�HKHW[PUN�[OLPY�ILOH]PV\Y���7LVWSL�HKVW[�JVNUP[P]L�Z[YH[LNPLZ�MVY�
JVWPUN�^P[O�[OLPY�ILOH]PV\Y�^OLU�^P[OPU�YPZR�L_WVZLK�LU]PYVUTLU[Z���0[�PZ�IHZLK�VU�H�
ºYPZR�[OLYTVZ[H[»�TVKLS�[OH[�KLÄULZ�LHJO�VM�V\Y�V^U�SL]LS�VM�YPZR��THPUS`�MYVT�VUL»Z�
WLYZVUHSP[ �̀��0[�T\Z[�IL�UV[LK�[OH[�[OL�YPZR�JVTWLUZH[PVU�[OLVY`�OHZ�Z[YVUN�HYN\TLU[Z�
IV[O�MVY�HUK�HNHPUZ[��
(U�PUKP]PK\HS»Z�WYVWLUZP[`�[V�[HRL�YPZRZ�PZ�PUÅ\LUJLK�I`�[OLPY�V^U�L_WLYPLUJL�HUK�[OH[�
VM�V[OLYZ�HUK�[OPZ�TVKLS�HZZ\TLZ�[OH[�[OL�KLNYLL�[V�^OPJO�^L�[HRL�YPZRZ�]HYPLZ�MYVT�
VUL�PUKP]PK\HS�[V�HUV[OLY���(U�PUKP]PK\HS»Z�[HYNL[�YPZR�SL]LS�JOHUNLZ�KLWLUKLU[�\WVU�
[OL�WVZP[P]L��P�L��ZH]PUN�PU�[PTL��VY�ULNH[P]L��P�L��PUQ\Y`��NHPUZ�^P[O�^OPJO�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�
HJOPL]LZ���;OLYLMVYL�PM�H�WLYZVU»Z�[HYNL[�YPZR�SL]LS�PZ�SV^�HUK�[OLPY�WLYJLW[PVU�VM�YPZR�PZ�
OPNO��[OLU�[OH[�WLYZVU�^PSS�ILOH]L�PU�H�JH\[PV\Z�THUULY���/V^L]LY��PM�[OL�[HYNL[�SL]LS�
YLTHPUZ�[OL�ZHTL��I\[�[OL�WLYJLW[PVU�VM�YPZR�PZ�HSZV�SV^��[OLU�P[�PZ�Z\NNLZ[LK�[OH[�[OL�
WLYZVU�^PSS�ILOH]L�PU�H�TVYL�YPZR`�THUULY�
9LJLU[�9::)�\UWYV[LJ[LK�JYVZZPUN�YLZLHYJO�HK]PZLZ�HNHPUZ[�SV^LYPUN�[OL�\ZLY»Z�
WLYJLW[PVU�VM�YPZR�H[�H�JYVZZPUN��^P[OV\[�HJ[\HSS`�PUJYLHZPUN�[OL�WYV[LJ[PVU�H[�[OL�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUN����0[�Z\NNLZ[Z�[OH[�[OPZ�JV\SK�WV[LU[PHSS`�SLHK�[V�HU�PUJYLHZL�PU�HJJPKLU[Z��[OPZ�
]PL^�JV\SK�HSZV�IL�HWWSPLK�[V�WYV[LJ[LK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���OV^L]LY�[OPZ�YLJVTTLUKH[PVU�
OHZ�`L[�[V�IL�]HSPKH[LK���/-�PZZ\L���!�:PNO[PUN�KPZ[HUJL!�NVVK�ZPNO[PUN�KPZ[HUJL�ZOV\SK�
PUKPJH[L�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�HZ�OPNO�YPZR��PZ�HU�L_HTWSL�VM�\ZLY�YPZR�JVTWLUZH[PVU���
������������ -HTPSPHYP[`�
(�WLYZVU»Z�MHTPSPHYP[`�^P[O�H�[HZR�JHU�HSZV�HMMLJ[�[OLPY�ILOH]PV\Y���/HIP[Z�MVYT�V]LY�H�
WLYPVK�VM�[PTL�[V�OLSW�WLVWSL�JVWL�^P[O�YLN\SHY�ZP[\H[PVUZ�HUK�LU]PYVUTLU[Z��[OYV\NO�
13
HWWS`PUN�ILOH]PV\YZ�[OH[�YLX\PYL�TPUPTHS�º[OPURPUN»���;OL�YLZ\S[HU[�ILOH]PV\Y�PU�H�
RUV^U�ZP[\H[PVU��^OPJO�^PSS�\S[PTH[LS`�IL�PUÅ\LUJLK�I`�VUL»Z�WLYZVUHSP[`��^PSS�IL�HZ�
HU�¸PTWSLTLU[H[PVU�PU[LU[PVU¹��I\�YP���^OLYL�HU�HJ[PVU�PZ�JHYYPLK�V\[�PU�YLZWVUZL�[V�H�
ZP[\H[PVU���;OPZ�LUHISLZ�WLVWSL�[V�\UKLY[HRL�WHY[PJ\SHY�[HZRZ��HUK�THU`�[HZRZ�H[�VUJL��
^P[OV\[�OH]PUN�[V�JVUJLYU�[OLTZLS]LZ�^P[O�[OL�ÄULY�KL[HPSZ�VM�OV^�[OH[�[HZR�PZ�HJ[\HSS`�
MVYTLK��[O\Z�HSSV^PUN�[OLT�[V�JVUJLU[YH[L�SLZZ�
;OL�ÄULY�KL[HPSZ�[OH[�WLVWSL�NYHK\HSS`�MHPS�[V�[HRL�PU[V�HJJV\U[�^OLU�\UKLY[HRPUN�
H�YLN\SHY�[HZR�JHU�IL�L_WSHPULK�HZ�HSS�[OL�PUMVYTH[PVU�WYLZLU[LK�[V�\Z�MYVT�[OL�
LU]PYVUTLU[��^OPJO�^L�WYVJLZZ�[V�KL[LYTPUL�[OL�TVZ[�Z\P[HISL�ILOH]PV\YHS�YLZWVUZL�
/V^L]LY��I`�UV[�[OPURPUN�HIV\[�[OLZL�ÄULY�KL[HPSZ�VM�H�[HZR��\ZLYZ�[LUK�[V�TPZZ�[OL�
¸L_[LYUHS�J\LZ¹�MYVT�[OL�LU]PYVUTLU[�[OH[�^V\SK�UVYTHSS`�PUMVYT�[OLT�^OL[OLY�[OL�
ILOH]PV\Y�[OL`�HYL�\UKLY[HRPUN�PZ�HWWYVWYPH[L��I\�YP��
-VY�L_HTWSL��/-�PZZ\L���!�7HZZLUNLY�JVTWSPHUJL�^P[O�4>3!�[OL�YLK�SPNO[�VM�H�4>3�
PZ�HZZVJPH[LK�^P[O�[OL�[YHPU�WHZZLUNLYZ�OH]L�HSPNO[LK�MYVT���(�WHZZLUNLY�\ZPUN�H�
Z[H[PVU�MVV[�JYVZZPUN�^P[O�TPUPH[\YL�^HYUPUN�SPNO[Z��VU�H�YLN\SHY�IHZPZ��TH`�L_OPIP[�[OPZ�
MHTPSPHYP[`�ILOH]PV\Y���;OL`�TH`�JYVZZ�HNHPUZ[�H�YLK�SPNO[��\UH^HYL�VM�[OL�PUMVYTH[PVU�
YLX\LZ[PUN�[OLT�[V�Z[VW��ILJH\ZL�[OL�ZP[\H[PVU�OHZ�[YPNNLYLK�HU�OHIP[\HS�YLZWVUZL���
;OL`�OH]L�MHPSLK�[V�[HRL�PU[V�HJJV\U[�[OL�ZP[\H[PVUHS�HUK�LU]PYVUTLU[HS�PUMVYTH[PVU�
ILMVYL�[OL`�OH]L�HJ[LK�
-HTPSPHYP[`�HSZV�WYLZLU[Z�V[OLY�WYVISLTZ���*VU[PU\LK�PTWSLTLU[H[PVU�VM�H�[HZR��
^OPJO�KVLZ�UV[�WYLZLU[�KHUNLYZ�VU�H�YLN\SHY�IHZPZ�JHU�SLHK�H�\ZLY�[V�[OPUR�[OL`�HYL�
UL]LY�NVPUN�[V�IL�L_WVZLK�[V�[OL�YPZR��[OLYLMVYL�[OL`�ILOH]L�SLZZ�JH\[PV\ZS`�PU�[OLZL�
JPYJ\TZ[HUJLZ���-VY�L_HTWSL��/-�PZZ\L���!�-YLX\LUJ`�VM�[YHPUZ!�JYVZZPUNZ�^P[O�SV^�
MYLX\LUJ`�VM�[YHPUZ�HYL�SPRLS`�[V�PUJYLHZL�[OL�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�YLN\SHY�\ZLYZ���(�
]LOPJSL�KYP]LY�\ZPUN�H�JYVZZPUN�[OH[�OHZ�VUS`�H�ML^�[YHPUZ�WHZZPUN�LHJO�KH`�TH`�YLK\JL�
[OLPY�SL]LS�VM�JH\[PVU���;OL�JVTIPUH[PVU�VM�JVU[PU\LK�\ZL�HUK�VUS`�L]LY�ZLLPUN�H�ML^�VY�
WVZZPIS`�UV�[YHPUZ�K\PYUN�[OPZ�WLYPVK�VM�[PTL��YLTV]LZ�[OL�PUKP]PK\HSZ�¸HIPSP[`�[V�[OPUR�
SVNPJHSS`�HUK�YH[PVUHSS`�HIV\[�[OLPY�ILOH]PV\Y¹��I\�YP����
������������ *VTWSHJLUJ`
0[�JV\SK�IL�Z\NNLZ[LK�[OH[�\ZLYZ�[HRL�H�¸P[�^VU»[�OHWWLU�[V�TL¹�HWWYVHJO�^OPSL�
JYVZZPUN���2UV^U�HZ�[OL�¸PUÅ\LUJL�VM�H[[YPI\[PVUHS�IPHZLZ�VU�WLVWSL»Z�JVTWHYH[P]L�YPZR�
L]HS\H[PVU¹��^L�YP���WLVWSL�^PSS�WLYJLP]L�[V�IL�H[�H�SLZZLY�YPZR�[OHU�V[OLYZ��VM[LU�YLSH[LK�
[V�Q\KNPUN�[OLTZLS]LZ�HZ�ILPUN�TVYL�ZRPSSLK��HUK�[OLYLMVYL�SLHKPUN�[V�YLK\JLK�SL]LSZ�VM�
JH\[PVU���
9::)�YLZLHYJO�PKLU[PÄLK�H�^LHR�JVYYLSH[PVU�IL[^LLU�H�\ZLYZ»�WLYJLW[PVU�VM�OV^�YPZR`�
H�ZP[\H[PVU�^HZ�HUK�[OLPY�RUV^SLKNL�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�^P[O�WYL]PV\Z�ULHY�TPZZLZ�VY�
HJJPKLU[Z���0[�WVPU[Z�V\[�OV^�[OPZ�JVTWSHJLUJ`�VM�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ�PZ�PU�JVU[YHZ[�[V�[OL�
YVHK�ZHML[`�ºISHJR�ZWV[»�[OLVY`�\ZLK�I`�[OL�.V]LYUTLU[��[V�PKLU[PM`�[V�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�
WYL]PV\Z�HYLHZ�VM�OPNO�HJJPKLU[Z��[OLYLMVYL�KYP]LYZ�HKQ\Z[PUN�[OLPY�ILOH]PV\Y�[V�YLK\JL�
YPZR�[V�[OLTZLS]LZ���0U�ZVTL�VM�[OL�JHZLZ�VIZLY]LK��\ZLYZ�[OH[�JVUÄYTLK�[OL`�RUL^�VM�
H�WYL]PV\Z�PUJPKLU[��JVU[PU\LK�[V�SLH]L�NH[LZ�VWLU�H[�H�MVV[WH[O�JYVZZPUN���
14
������������ 4LU[HS�4VKLSZ
<ZLYZ�MVYT�TLU[HS�TVKLSZ�VM�ZP[\H[PVUZ�[V�OLSW�[OLT�THRL�ZLUZL�VM�HUK�W\[�Z[Y\J[\YL�
PU[V�[OL�^VYSK�HYV\UK�[OLT���/V^L]LY��PM�[OL�TVKLS�KVLZ�UV[�JVU[HPU�HSS�[OL�JVYYLJ[�
PUMVYTH[PVU�VY�[OL`�OH]L�TPZYLWYLZLU[H[PVUZ�VM�[OL�LU]PYVUTLU[��[OL�\ZLY�TH`�
WLYJLP]L�[OLTZLS]LZ�HZ�ZHML�^OLU�\UKLY[HRPUN�[HZRZ��^OLU�PU�MHJ[�[OL`�HYL�L_WVZPUN�
[OLTZLS]LZ�[V�KHUNLY��^L�YP��
0U�[OL�JVU[L_[�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��\ZLYZ�VM[LU�OH]L�HU�PUJVYYLJ[�TLU[HS�TVKLS�VM�[YHPU�
ZWLLK�HUK�KPZ[HUJL����/-�PZZ\L���!�<ZLY�WLYJLW[PVU�VM�[YHPU�ZWLLK�HUK�KPZ[HUJL!�
[YHPU�ZWLLK�HUK�KPZ[HUJL�PZ�\UKLYLZ[PTH[LK�I`�\ZLYZ��^OPJO�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�PUJYLHZLK�
KLJPZPVU�THRPUN�LYYVYZ�I`�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ���;OLPY�TVKLS�PZ�IHZLK�\WVU�YVHK�
]LOPJSL�ZWLLK��^OPJO�L_WVZLZ�[OLT�[V�PUJYLHZLK�YPZR�^OLU�Q\KNPUN�[YHPU�TV]LTLU[���
��� �����������$GGUHVVLQJ�+)�LVVXHV
;OL�KH[HIHZL�OHZ�PKLU[PÄLK�[OL�[`WL�VM�\ZLY�MHPS\YL�HZ�H�YLZ\S[�VM�LHJO�/-�PZZ\L���;OL�
[`WL�VM�MHPS\YL�JVTTP[[LK�I`�H�\ZLY�^PSS�KL[LYTPUL�[OL�HWWYVWYPH[L�YPZR�JVU[YVS�TLHZ\YL�
[V�IL�PTWSLTLU[LK�[V�LUZ\YL�[OL�YPZR�PZ�HZ�SV^�HZ�YLHZVUHIS`�WYHJ[PJHISL���
/V^�/490�HKKYLZZ�[OLZL�PZZ\LZ��PU�[LYTZ�VM�LUZ\YPUN�[OL�HWWYVWYPH[L�YPZR�JVU[YVS�
TLHZ\YLZ�HYL�PU�WSHJL��PZ�KLWLUKLU[�\WVU�RUV^PUN�[OL�[`WL�VM�MHPS\YL�JVTTP[[LK�I`�
[OL�\ZLY���;OL�O\THU�MHPS\YL�[`WLZ�OH]L�ILLU�ZPTWSPÄLK�MVY�[OL�W\YWVZLZ�VM�[OPZ�^VYR��
PU[V�[OL�MVSSV^PUN�JH[LNVYPLZ!
���� =PVSH[PVU�ILOH]PV\Y�PZ�H�KLSPILYH[L�KL]PH[PVU�MYVT�[OL�JVYYLJ[�WYVJLK\YL���;OL�\ZLY�
WLYJLP]LZ�[OL�ILULÄ[Z��P�L���ZH]PUN�[PTL��VM�\UKLY[HRPUN�[OL�]PVSH[PVU�V\[^LPNOZ�
[OVZL�YPZRZ�VM�JVTTP[[PUN�P[��P�L���YPZR�VM�ILPUN�OP[�I`�H�[YHPU����;OPZ�[`WL�VM�ILOH]PV\Y�
PZ�TVZ[�HWWYVWYPH[LS`�KLHS[�^P[O�[OYV\NO�LTWOHZPZPUN�[OL�JVUZLX\LUJLZ���
���� ,YYVY�ILOH]PV\Y�PZ�HU�\UPU[LU[PVUHS�ILOH]PV\Y�[OH[�KL]PH[LZ�MYVT�[OL�JVYYLJ[�
WYVJLK\YL���;OL�\ZLY�JHYYPLZ�V\[�H�[HZR��P�L���JYVZZPUN�[OL�YHPS^H`��I\[�MHPSZ�[V�[HRL�
HJJV\U[�VM�[OL�JVYYLJ[�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YL��P�L���KVLZ�UV[�JVTWYLOLUK�JOHUNL�
PU�H\KPISL�^HYUPUN�[VUL����;OLZL�HYL�IL[[LY�HKKYLZZLK�[OYV\NO�[OL�HWWSPJH[PVU�VM�
HWWYVWYPH[L�TLHZ\YLZ�^OPJO�KLZPNU�V\[�[OL�LYYVY���
������������� ,VVXHV�EH\RQG�+6(�FRQWURO
0[�PZ�YLJVNUPZLK�[OH[�ZVTL�VM�[OL�PKLU[PÄLK�PZZ\LZ�HYL�V\[ZPKL�[OL�JVU[YVS�VM�[OL�YHPS^H`�
PUK\Z[Y`�HUK�MHSS�\UKLY�[OL�YLZWVUZPIPSP[`�VM�V[OLY�VYNHUPZH[PVUZ���/V^L]LY��[OL`�OH]L�
ILLU�THPU[HPULK�^P[OPU�[OL�KH[HIHZL�HZ�[OL`�JVU[PU\L�[V�PTWHJ[�VU�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�
SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ���
*V�VYKPUH[PVU�^P[O�[OLZL�V\[ZPKL�VYNHUPZH[PVUZ�TH`�Z\WWVY[�[OL�KL]LSVWTLU[�VM�
TLHZ\YLZ�[V�KLHS�^P[O�ZVTL�VM�[OL�/-�PZZ\LZ��MVY�L_HTWSL��JVSSHIVYH[PVU�^P[O�/PNO^H`�
(\[OVYP[PLZ�[V�KYP]L�JOHUNLZ�PU�ZPNUHNL�KLZPNU��[V�HKKYLZZ�[OL�LYYVY�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ��
/-�PZZ\LZ�Z\JO�HZ�[OLZL�TH`�WYLZLU[�HU�VWWVY[\UP[`�MVY�YL]PL^�I`�[OL�/:,»Z�9HPS^H`Z�
7VSPJ`�;LHT���)\[�SPTP[H[PVUZ�HYL�HNHPU�YLJVNUPZLK�^OLYL�[OL�SL]LS�VM�YPZR�JVU[YVS�PZ�
ILUJOTHYRLK�I`�LZ[HISPZOLK�Y\SLZ�HUK�WYPUJPWSLZ��Z\JO�HZ�[OL�/PNO^H`�*VKL����
15
��� �����������0RYLQJ�IRUZDUG�WR�WRROV�DQG�DSSURDFKHV�IRU�,QVSHFWRUV
(WWS`PUN�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�K\YPUN�[OL�PUZWLJ[PVU�WYVJLZZ��MVY�KLÄUPUN�^OH[�
ZOV\SK�IL�L_WLJ[LK�H[�H�WHY[PJ\SHY�JYVZZPUN�[`WL��[V�LUZ\YL�HU`�YPZR�PZ�JVU[YVSSLK��^PSS�
IL�JV]LYLK�HZ�WHY[�VM�[OL�KL]LSVWTLU[�VM�[VVSZ�HUK�HWWYVHJOLZ���
��� �����������'DWDEDVH�RI�KXPDQ�IDFWRUV�LVVXHV
;OL�MVSSV^PUN�WHNLZ�JVU[HPU�[OL�����O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ���;^V�PZZ\LZ�HYL�WYLZLU[LK�
WLY�WHNL��PU�U\TLYPJHS�VYKLY�\ZPUN�[OL�YLMLYLUJL�U\TILYZ���
16
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 01 Creation date 06.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 2. 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Phone cabinet instructions
Crossing type User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Berry Lane UWC: general wear
and tear have made the phone
box instructions at this crossing
difficult to read.
user.
safety critical information, but is not required to be learnt by UWC users.
Information should be provided within telephones cabinets at UWC, giving details to the user of how to call the signaller and
information regarding the location of the crossing. However, any information not clearly conveying the correct procedure nor the
necessary details required by the signaller to ascertain the location of the level crossing, may reduce the user’s willingness to carry
out the required phone call.
Superfluous information, not required by the level crossing user, may also hinder the communication between the signaller and
For example, the phonetic alphabet appears at some UWC+T. It forms part of the railway industry training to help convey
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Unclear phone instructions provided within phone cabinets at UWC may result in users failing to communicate with the signaller.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER bi/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) th/er
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 02 Creation date 06.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
road. Distractions may be seasonal, such as fun fairs or other similar events that may be held only once a year.
crossing only a few times a year may not always identify these particular events.
Distractions at the side of the rail line may also impact on the attention of the train driver to observe the crossing.
The attention of vehicle drivers when approaching the level crossing may be diverted because of visual distractions at the side of the
Therefore visits to a
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 2. 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Driver distractions
Crossing type User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Distractions on the approach to a level crossing may impair the performance of both vehicle and train drivers.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER GI/GN7611
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 03 Creation date 10.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Weather: Ice
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
conditions.
Issue at a level crossing
Helpston: ice on the road has
previously caused a vehicle driver
to slide through the barriers onto
the level crossing.
Lolham, Greatford, Maxey:
crossings are all on ‘B’ roads and
are not gritted during icy weather
However, they are all
used as shortcuts by local vehicle
drivers during rush-hours.
Icy weather conditions may affect the capability of vehicles to stop when required at the crossing.
close to the train line because of the risk of sliding forward onto the tracks.
The effect on vehicle driver
behaviour may also be affected by the presence of ice, such as not wanting to stop for the initial warning activation when they are
Level crossings on ‘B’ roads may not be gritted during icy weather conditions and these may present a driving hazard to level
crossing users.
The risks to users on foot when walking over the level crossing may also be increased, resulting in slips and falls.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER mp/001
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 04 Creation date 10.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
them.
Issue at a level crossing
Maxey CCTV: People living very
close to the crossing often walk
very slowly across, knowing that
the signallers will have to wait for
They also raise their hand
to the CCTV cameras as a gesture
of defiance.
Regular users are also likely to lower their perceived level of risk and commit a violation.
Some locals disregard crossing procedures because they feel aggrieved at having to wait for trains to pass.
complaints regarding the reliability and level of safety measures used at the crossings.
between a vehicle and train has recently occurred at a local crossing.
When people continually encounter circumstances which they recognise, such as using a level crossing, they generalise the
circumstances in which they are within and miss the external cues from the surrounding environment. Level crossing users that live
or work in close proximity to a crossing can become familiar with the crossing attributes and user procedures required for crossing.
Their behaviour can become habitual, resulting in users failing to look for unexpected information, leaving them open to making
errors of judgment.
Vehicle driver behaviour research at
crossings showed 53% of red light runners at a range of testing locations used the crossings at least once a day.
Locals living close to a level crossing (often in old the railway cottages), may undertake risky behaviour when using the crossing.
Locals also raise many
These are more prevalent when a near miss 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Users familiarity with a crossing
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when using the crossing.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER bu/ri
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) tr/ah
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) pi/ve
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent we/ri
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK HMRI internal report
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 05 Creation date 10.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Frequency of trains
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
User risk perception tends to be low where there are infrequent trains.
UWC’s with accident history are associated with train lines that have low train frequencies.
trains per week, the same regular user of the crossing has been hit twice by passing trains.
The risk compensation behaviour of users explains that users will behave less cautiously when they have a low perception of risk.
A regular user’s expectations of not seeing a train are
reinforced every time they use the crossing and a train does not pass, perceiving there to be a low chance of a train passing the next
time they cross. This results in the user adapting their behaviour to this condition, such as behaving less cautiously.
For example, at a train line with only two
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ar/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) pi/ve
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) ar/us
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent ad/ri
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK GI/RN7611
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others ra/dr, ab/dr2
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 06 Creation date 10.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Woburn Sands MCB: the road
junction close to the crossing is
used by local people and
commercial traffic.
presented to the vehicle driver and therefore cause distraction.
the decisions and actions required at a level crossing.
warning system to concentrate on other vehicle drivers may increase their decision making errors at the crossing.
insufficient clearance on the other-side, it is in our opinion that vehicle drivers are:
Roads that intersect with the vehicle driver’s road before or after the level crossing may increase the amount of visual information
A vehicle driver’s primary focus of attention is likely to be on
assessing the presence and determining the actions of other road users movement in and around the junctions, and secondly on
This reduction in observation of the level crossing and/or the activated
Right turns on the exit of the level crossing pose a particular problem for vehicles blocking-back over the crossing, especially at
automatic crossings. While a vehicle is waiting to turn across the path of oncoming traffic, waiting traffic behind the turning vehicle,
queue over the crossing. Although there are no reasons provided by research for vehicle drivers continuing to cross when there is
Unaware of the dangers posed by waiting on the crossing;
(if immediately after the road has been opened to traffic) The vehicle drivers believe the warning system will not be activated so
soon after the previous warning;
Tailgating the vehicle in-front, to ensure they are already on the crossing, to avoid having to wait if the warning system is activated.
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Road junctions
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
Road junctions close to the level crossing may result in increased decision making and errors by vehicle drivers, and blocking-back
over the crossing.
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ntsb/sa
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) tr/ah
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) st/au
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 07 Creation date 11.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Vehicle approach speed
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Road vehicle research has suggested that speed is a factor in road accidents and therefore, speed could also be considered as a
contributor to vehicle drivers not stopping at level crossings.
activated warning at a level crossing.
drivers passing through at a higher average speed.
therefore they continue across the crossing which they perceive at the time to present a lesser risk to themselves.
With increased speed, vehicle drivers will have less time to react to an
Greater numbers of red light violations have been recorded at a level crossing with road vehicle
Vehicle drivers have responded to red light violations (or provide this reason when questioned to avoid potential prosecution) by
stating their concern that stopping when travelling at higher speeds will result in a vehicle-vehicle collision at the level crossing,
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
The speed of the road traversing a level crossing is a factor in vehicle driver errors.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER vi/re
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) st/au
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) wi/an2
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 08 Creation date 11.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour county.
However,
Issue at a level crossing
Lincolnshire is a retirement
They have a high
percentage of elderly drivers who
drive during the day and at
relatively low speeds.
there are problems with elderly
drivers passing through the
activated warning system.
Recently a elderly driver went
through a red light while travelling
at only 40mph in a 60mph zone.
crossings.
warning lights. This behaviour has been associated with lower reaction speed and lack of visual awareness of their immediate
High numbers of other age-groups within a geographical location may also contribute to increased violations or errors at level
crossings.
Local populations with higher numbers of a certain age-group may result in an increased number of violations or errors at level
At a red light camera testing site, a disproportionate number of more elderly people continued to travel past the red
surroundings, rather than being assigned to them purposefully crossing the activated warning system.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Age of drivers
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Violations at level crossings may be influenced by the age of the local population.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER vi/ve
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) hu/in
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) dft/in2
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent aa/re
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 09 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Signal box: track side workers
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
However, this does not always happen and can create problems for signallers when checking via the CCTV monitors if a level
public standing track side.
them from the general public. However, these are not worn consistently by all workers, and this can again create problems for
Recent research has suggested the use of colour monitors as acceptable for use within signal boxes.
If track side workers are carrying out duties in the vicinity of a level crossing, they should phone the local signaller and inform them
of the type of work being carried out, the area they are working within and for how long.
crossing is clear. The high-visibility clothing worn by track-side workers appears white when viewed on black and white monitors.
If the signaller has not been made aware of any work being carried out, the signaller assumes the people to be members of the
It is now policy for track-side workers to wear hardhats, which can provide the signaller with an additional visual cue to help identify
distinguishing between workers and the general public. 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
High-visibility clothing appears white on black & white monitors.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 10 Creation date 11.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
road.
Issue at a level crossing
Dockhills CCTV level crossing (&
Moathills in background): provides
access from a lorry park to a main
The crossings have been
reviewed and changes made to
accommodate for the large
volumes of HGV’s that use these
on a daily basis.
may
driver’s awareness of their vehicle’s poorer braking performance, and therefore considering it safer to continue.
A higher percentage of HGVs are involved in level crossings incidents than cars (total number of incidents from collisions with both
trains and level crossing equipment), when compared with the proportion of cars using level crossings and road miles travelled.
It has been proposed in a report on HGV accidents at level crossings that this may be due to the following.
The size of the vehicles; they have less room for error when compared to cars.
They may not be responding to the activation of the crossing warning system in sufficient time. The HGV study proposed they
attempt to traverse the crossing once the barriers have already started to descend, suggesting that it could be to do with the
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Representation of HGV users
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
HGV drivers form a disproportionately high number of incidents at level crossings.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER vi/hg
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 11 Creation date 11.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Pedestrian access
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
crossing.
Issue at a level crossing
Roydon CCTV: as the barriers
descend, a school boy runs
underneath to gain access to the
platform at the other side of the
Once across, the
school boy realised the train was
a through-train and he casually
waited for the next train.
activated warning. At crossings with bridges, users are able to use an alternative access for crossing the railway lines.
continue to cross to ensure they catch their train.
Vehicular level crossings without pedestrian bridges influences the risk taking behaviour of both pedestrians and train passengers.
It has been observed that pedestrians and passengers approaching the level crossing, on seeing and/or hearing the activation of the
level crossing warning system, rush across the crossing to avoid having to wait. Users at crossing without bridges are more likely to
commit violations by attempting to run across the crossing, aware that they have no alternative means of crossing during the
Crossings without bridges, used by train passengers to gain access to other platforms at a nearby station may undertake particularly
risky behaviour to avoid missing their train. The activated warning informs the passenger that a train is approaching and they
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Pedestrian and passengers are more likely to undertake risky behaviour at vehicular level crossings where bridges are not provided.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 12 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
to cross.
times.
are not scheduled under passenger timetables.
knowledgeable of the train timetable.
a train and the reduced vigilance that they may therefore demonstrate in crossing”.
The supposed regularity of trains passing a point at a known time is being used by level crossing users to make judgments of when
Users are assuming trains to pass a crossing at a particular point in time, thus believing the crossing to be safe at certain
Many users also believe the timetable to be ‘set in stone’, thus allowing them to make an accurate assessment of when they
should and should not cross. However, users fail to consider the variations in train schedules and that many trains, such as freight
The research refers to a landowner who retains a train timetable within his tractor cab to allow him to make ‘safe’ assessments of
when he should cross. Other research also identified 4% of users considered a crossing to be ‘safe’ because they were
GI/GN7611 indicates that the regularity of trains to be a factor in posing a high risk to users, due to “the rarity of them encountering 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Regularity of trains
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
time.
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed restrictions etc., all
contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ar/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) GI/GN7611
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 13 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
Groups
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour The
Issue at a level crossing
Helpston: youngsters use this
crossing mainly on bicycles.
signallers at Helpston signal box
are aware that a group of
youngsters riding bicycles up to
the crossing, will probably all
attempt to jump the lights if the
first youngster does so.
The nature of a group of people will mean they look and listen less at their surroundings and be more concerned with the dynamics
of the group. This may result in the first few of a groups of walkers crossing carefully, but the remaining group members
continuing to progress over the railway line without checking for oncoming trains. This may be a particular problems at footpath
and bridleway crossings on routes used often by ramblers.
Young people in groups also exhibit more risky behaviour. A young person’s perception of risk tends to be one of a ‘risk adopter’,
however, although most young people will not engage in extreme danger, their perception of risk is sufficient for them to behave
dangerously, especially when provided with opportunities.
Many of the behaviours exhibited by young people are driven by a particular motivation (an opportunity), for example, not being
picked upon or to just be accepted by others. When in groups, this type of motivation can further influence young people to
undertake very risky behaviours, more so than when on their own. 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 14 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Helpston: ‘Parents’ have been
observed by the signallers at
Helpston signal, driving past the
activated warning lights, with
children in the vehicle.
Vehicle driver violations may be associated with the time of day.
lunch-hour.
specific times.
The rate of vehicle incidents increases at crossings during the
morning and evening rush-hours. Vehicle drivers needing to arrive somewhere on time (e.g.,meeting) may consider the risks of
passing through the activated warning lights to be lower than the perceived risks associated with being late. This may be further
compounded with the general increase in road traffic during rush-hours and at the beginning and end of the school day.
Increases in vehicle driver violations were also detected during the later afternoon hours and is suggested as being associated with
the school-run (vi/re). Parents on multi-school runs, prior to driving to work is also considered a factor in risk taking behaviour,
because of the need to drive to various locations within a short period of time. Crossings used as access routes for the school-run,
as well as those in close proximity to the school may have higher number of violations as a result.
Red light violations are also high for some sites at midday. This may be due to people trying to fit in activities within their
Factories and other similar industrial working environments have specific staff working hours, with workers arriving and
leaving on-mass. This may result in violations at crossings nearby because of the large volumes of traffic using the crossing at
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Time of day
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school day.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER pi/ve
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) vi/re
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) aa/re
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 15 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Visual clutter
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour The
attention.
Issue at a level crossing
Tallington CCTV: the approach to
this crossing is heavily cluttered
with additional information.
branding of the petrol station on
the right-hand side is of similar
colour to the crossing signs, thus
reducing the impact of the sign
information on the vehicle driver’s
reduce the impact of the level crossing information.
Vehicle drivers approaching the level crossing are presented with an array of standard level crossing information and warning signs.
However, superfluous information and roadside structures (both rail and other authorities) in the vehicle driver’s visual field may
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
Superfluous information and roadside structures on the approach to the crossing may reduce the user’s detection of level crossing
information and warning signs.
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 16 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Helpston: has had significant
maintenance over the last few
years and they often close the
main road to all vehicles.
However, because people see the
staff maintenance cars at the
crossing, they still perceive it
acceptable to use and since they
have made the effort to drive all
the way to the crossing, they
request permission to cross.
Rail staff are required to wear high-visibility clothing when working on or near the railway.
misinterpret an activated warning system as ‘safe’ when rail staff are present at the level crossing.
trains would be passing if staff are track-side.
Vehicle drivers and pedestrians may
Users often assume or inquire if
they can continue to pass through the activated warning as they believe the rail staff are are only testing the equipment or that no
Users at unprotected crossings may also interpret the presence of rail staff to mean the line is closed to trains, resulting in users
behaving less cautiously when crossing.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Presence of rail staff
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing may have an undesirable influence on level crossing user behaviour.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER pi/ve
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 17 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Understanding of warning lights
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
The
Issue at a level crossing
Tallington CCTV: vehicle drivers
approaching the crossing in a
30mph zone, continue to drive
through the amber flashing light on
numerous occasions.
approaching vehicle was in a
position to stop at the lights,
however they continued through
the amber light.
Users
more for level crossings) interpreted the required action for an amber light incorrectly for both light warning systems.
routinely ignored by vehicle drivers.
Not all vehicle drivers fully understand the instruction given and the required user behaviour to the onset of an amber light.
understanding of the steady amber at road traffic lights and at level crossing lights was compared. Higher numbers of users (slightly
There is also evidence that some users incorrectly determine the required action upon the onset of the red lights at a level crossing.
Just over 50% of users correctly confirmed the required action at the onset of a red light compared to all users for road traffic lights.
The wigwag light system also used at fire stations to stop road traffic and allow the fire pumps to be driven onto the road, are
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
crossings.
The onset of the amber and proceeding red lights of the activated warning system lead to various vehicle driver behaviours at level
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER pi/ve
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) vi/hg
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 18 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Vehicle drivers consider the warning time of the activated system (required to allow for safety margins) to be far too long.
drivers at automatic crossings also overestimate the time they are required to wait.
appointment to make’ were time related. The greater the time delay, the more risky behaviour of level crossing users.
crossings and after 60 seconds at barrier crossings.
UWC/MWL.
Vehicle
Over 50% of drivers who traversed a crossing
during the activated warning system said they were unwilling to stop. Reasons given for their actions, such as ‘having an
American
research suggests vehicle drivers expect trains to arrive within 20 seconds, but they begin to lose patience after 40 seconds at open
In particular, this overestimation of waiting time has been found to be a factor in why users cross during the red light phase at
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Closure time
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The amount of time the user expects to wait at the level crossing may influence their risk taking behaviour.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER pi/ve
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) gr/lm
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) tr/ah
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent tu/us
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK GI/RN7611
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others ab/dr, HMRI internal report
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 19 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Open gates
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
UWC gates are provided closed across the road and open away from the railway lines. Footpath and Bridleway crossings have a
variety of gates fitted that are closed across the paths on the approach to both sides of the crossing.
without carrying out the required crossing procedure. It
Train drivers often report open gates to the local signaller.
Gates left open affect the behaviour of users approaching a crossing. It predisposes users to see the crossing as ‘safe’, and cross
This is especially relevant in the case of irregular or first time users at UWC.
has been suggested that these types of users may have a mental model of an open gate being similar to an automatic crossing. If
the gate is open, then it is safe to cross.
This impacts on the running of the trains as the signaller will request train
drivers to slow on approach and observe for any level crossing users.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Open gates increases the risk to approaching users.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER tu/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) ar/us
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) HMRI internal report
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent hu/hu
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 20 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
When two trains arrive at an automatic vehicular crossing without the minimum road opening time, users are provided with a
change in the tone of the audible warning.
Pedestrians waiting at the level crossing for a train to pass, do not detect or understand the continued warning system to apply to
another train coming, only to the train just passed. Users have traversed the level crossing while the second tone has been audible.
Human factors research into miniature warning lights at UWC/MWL also highlighted that users poorly understood the meaning of
the change of tone associated with a second train approaching. Other users have commented that the change in tone is not
distinctive enough.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Audible alarm
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER tr/ah
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) HSE/ra, section E
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) tu/us
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent hu/hu
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 21 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
Darkness
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
During
Issue at a level crossing
Fox covert footpath: this crossing
is used by local school children as
an access point between their
homes and the school.
winter months, many children will
be using this crossing during the
hours of darkness.assessing speed, resulting in increased decision making errors by level crossing users.
use the crossing safely.
determine train speed remains a separate issue because it is a result of an environmental effect.
The speed of an object can be judged by assessing the moving object against the background. However, during the hours of
darkness, the background is not visible against the moving object and therefore users lose this important visual information cue for
Farmers often continue to use UWC’s during the hours of darkness, especially during harvesting time. The context of working
during darkness and under tight timescales to transport produce from their farms could impact on the behaviour of the farmer to
Issue 25 “Users perception of train speed and distance” addresses the use of an incorrect mental model of train speed and distance
as a factor in why level crossing users may cross during an unsafe period of time. The impact of darkness in impairing a user to
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
users.
Unprotected crossings (without MWL) used during the hours of darkness may lead to increased decision making errors by crossing
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ntsb/na
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) wa/ac
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 22 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Folly Bank AHB: on the approach
to Glinton Village, the warning
lights are difficult to detect due to
the low position of the sun behind
the crossing.other users missing the activated warning system at level crossings.
accidents at crossings is an established cause.
lights. The previous grey back boarding remains legal, but replacement back boards are of the new style.
The combined affects of sun reflection and the use of limited light output in the warning lights may contribute to vehicle drivers and
At automatic open crossings, the lack of any barrier dropping
means vehicle drivers and others may continue to pass through the lights much later during the activated warning time.
Although it should be noted, of the drivers who stated they were unaware of the crossing when they had run a red light, only 1%
gave the sun as a reason for impairing their vision (UK based research). However, in non-UK research the sun as an affect on
In Scotland, the affects of low sun in winter present a particular problem, especially
at open crossings. Therefore the issue of the sun and its effect on the flashing warning lights remains a precursor for vehicle drivers
unintentionally passing the activated warning system.
The conspicuity of warning lights is improved with the use of the red and white chequered board surround, located behind the 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Conspicuity of flashing lights
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The effectiveness of flashing lights is limited by veiling glare, limited light output and their position.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER st/au
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) pi/ve
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) HMRI internal report
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent tr/ah
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK vi/ve
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others te/ca
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 23 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Sunlight strobing
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Kirknewton crossing: on the
approach to this crossing in
Scotland, sunlight strobing across
the road causes particular
problems for road vehicle users.road.
because of the lack of any physical barrier across the road to act as a final warning cue of the presence of a crossing.
Trees along the sides of the road, combined with sunlight passing through the trees can provide a strobe lighting affect along the
A vehicle driver approaching a level crossing is subjected to a broken line of shadow and light, which may affect the vehicle
driver’s detection of objects ahead of them. This may result in the vehicle driver continuing to cross over a level crossing, including
those with activated warning lights. This is a particular problem at open crossings, those with and without activated warning lights
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
the visibility of vehicle drivers.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road which may impair
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 24 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
the crossing. The exits from the crossing are left clear and therefore allow for vehicle drivers to clear the crossing.
barriers (pi/re, st/au).
Automatic half barriers are normally kept in the raised position and when lowered, the barriers extend only across the entrances to
Although half barriers increase the observance by drivers of the automatic warning system, they introduce another undesirable risk
taking behaviour, known as zigzagging. The vehicle driver not wanting to wait at the level crossing, weaves around the first barrier
onto the other side of the road and exits via the open gate side.
An earlier report stated that half of all accidents at AHB’s are due to the drivers violating user procedures and zigzagging around the
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Half barrier
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Automatic half barriers facilitate vehicle drivers to undertake risk taking behaviour.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HSE/Ra
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) vi/re
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) pi/re
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent HSE/ra, section E
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK mo/vi
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others st/au
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 25 Creation date 15.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
User perception of train speed & distance
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
The speed at which trains travel and how far it takes for a train to stop is vastly underestimated by the general public.
various perceptual problems that may increase the decision making errors of users at level crossings.
Large objects appear to move more slowly than smaller objects travelling at the same speed.
much closer that it becomes easier to determine its actual speed and distance.
unprotected level crossings.
Users in vehicles are to some extent ‘shielded’ from the senses normally evoked from a high speed passing train. A greater
There are
When looking head-on to an approaching train, the rate of change of the trains size is extremely slow and it is not until the train is
The public are using an incorrect mental model of road vehicle movement for estimating train speed, distance travelled over time
and potential stopping distances. This may increase the decision making errors of users when crossing both protected and
understanding of train speed and its size is enhanced when standing close to a passing train.
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
Train speed and distance is underestimated by users, which may result in increased decision making errors by users at level
crossings.
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ntsb/sa
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) nu/de
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) de/ra
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 26 Creation date 16.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour side.
Issue at a level crossing
Maxey CCTV: foliage covers the
information sign on the left-hand
The information provided to
the vehicle driver is further
reduced because a maintenance
van has parked in front of the
crossing, blocking the view of the
warning light.
warning cue to vehicle drivers. Vehicle drivers have less time to react and respond accordingly through changing their driving
behaviour.
as the vehicle driver has even less time to respond to the required change in driving behaviour.
This issue is also applicable to train drivers.
Foliage that has been left to overgrow on the approach to the level crossing covers the information signs and removes the initial
This issue is further compounded when the level crossing is positioned on the bend in a road or on a high speed road,
Foliage on the lineside may impact on the train driver from obtaining a sufficient view
while on the approach to a crossing, of any information, objects or people on the crossing.
5. Error type
Issue
Foliage
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 27 Creation date 16.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Harvesting time
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Farmers will need to transport produce between fields and storage areas and from their farmland to other sites. The increased
crossing the railway line, results in increased risk taking behaviour by farmers.
their work progress.
frequency of use of UWC’s over a short period of time, the time critical factor of harvesting and the lengthy procedure required for
During harvesting, farmers are more likely to leave the gates open and fail to follow the correct crossing procedure to avoid hindering
Farmers may also adopt alternative crossing methods, such as positioning a ‘look-out’ at the UWC to observe for oncoming trains,
allowing the UWC users to cross with minimal disruption.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Harvesting time influences the risk taking behaviour of UWC users.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) HMRI internal report
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 28 Creation date 16.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
internal vehicle features that may reduce the vehicle driver’s detection of the lights.
available for the vehicle driver to respond accordingly.
If a user is unable to clearly see the warning lights at a level crossing, from either a position of safety at the crossing, or a clear line of
sight from their direction of approach, this may result in the user moving into an unsafe area to read the lights or cross without
taking account of the warning information.
The 10cm diameter of the red and green miniature warning lights at UWC were found to be of adequate size for being discerned
from a distance of up to 15m. However, it was suggested that an ‘alternative’ to MWL’s be considered if they were to positioned
on the far side of the tracks and the total distance across the tracks was greater than 15m. There is currently on-going discussions
within NWR to address this issue.
The position of road vehicle wigwag lights is also critical for providing sufficient time for approaching vehicle drivers to observe and
respond to the lights. Their position should accommodate the approach route of all types of road vehicles and take account of any
Poorly positioned lights may reduce the time 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Position of warning lights
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 29 Creation date 17.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Quantity of information
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
cross.
Issue at a level crossing
Information sign for indicating to
drivers of large or slow vehicles to
park at the sign and call the
signaller from the phone box at
crossing, to obtain permission to
The above sign is located on a
bend prior to the crossing on a
road with a national speed limit.
anyway.
A road transport study provided a minimum exposure time required (based upon a simple calculation using the amount of words
and driver speed) for drivers of vehicles to register and understand the information provided by a vehicle activated warning system.
Large quantities of information on signs with an inadequate time for users to register and interpret the information may result in two
user behaviours:
1. The time it takes the user to read all of the information and respond accordingly to its instructions, they have proceeded past the
sign and decide to ignore its requirements and continue across the crossing; or
2. The user does not have sufficient time to comprehend all of the information and makes a judgment that it does not apply to them
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The quantity of signage information that can be read and understood decreases with road speed.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER wi/ve
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 30 Creation date 17.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
playground.
Issue at a level crossing
Woburn Sands: ladder for railway
use only, located at the entrance
to a footpath level crossing.
The crossing provided access
from a large housing area to both
a school and a children’s
The playground
provided children with similar
looking ‘climbing ladders’.
Level crossings can be perceived by some people as an accessible point to the railway infrastructure. Objects located at level
crossing, may also contribute to increased trespassing.
crossings, that resemble day-to-day objects or create opportunities for use may increase the likelihood of children or young people
playing in and around level crossings.
The position of the crossing close to housing areas, schools and other places where children and young people may utilise the
Youth perception of risk tends to be one of a ‘risk adopter’. Although most young people will not engage in extreme danger, their
perception of risk is sufficient for them to behave dangerously, especially when provided with opportunities.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Trespassing on rail structures
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in undesirable risk
taking behaviour by members of the public.
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER dr/yo
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 31 Creation date 17.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Location near rail stations
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
St.Margarets CCTV: this crossing
is positioned next to the station.
The barrier downtime is lengthy,
especially during the evening
rush-hour when there is an
increase in train traffic.
deactivated.
the vicinity of a station.
Level crossings located adjacent to a rail station can increase the length of time the warning system is activated, and therefore
require users to wait for longer periods of time at the crossing. This is due to slower trains pulling into and out of the station in
close proximity from either direction and the interval between the trains being too short to allow the warning system to be
At level crossings located next to a rail station, users estimated their waiting time to be much higher than at crossings not located in
It is suggested that users (for example regular, local users who are aware of the increased waiting times)
may have been encouraged to violate the warning system because of the potential for a prolonged delay to their journey.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Level crossings adjacent to rail stations influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers and other users.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER pi/ve
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) wi/an2
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 32 Creation date 17.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Circumstances which present a lower perceived risk, often result in changes to a user’s behaviour.
users perceive UWC and footpath crossings to be safer when trains are slower. In this case, the users are responding to the
perceived low level of risk presented by slower trains by behaving less cautiously.
the barrier.
crossings. However, slow trains speeds are also a factor because of the effect it may have upon the user’s perception of risk.
It has been established that
For example, users may cross while a train is in
view, they may not cross as quickly or they may look less often while crossing.
At open crossings with slow moving trains, vehicle drivers (and pedestrians) may be inclined to think “I can beat the train”. By being
able to edge forward past a point of safety and look along the railway line, they may believe they have ample time to make a safe
crossing in front of a slower train. This behaviour may also be prevalent at half barrier crossings, where users may zigzag around
Railway Group Standard GI/GN7611 identifies “maximum train speed” as a factor for consideration within risk assessments at level 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Train speeds
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
/3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ar/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) GI/GN7611
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 33 Creation date 18.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Sighting distance
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour crossing.
Issue at a level crossing
Marsh Lane: the sighting distance
is good at this footpath level
established view that good sighting times will always reduce the risk of accidents at unprotected level crossings.
sufficient time to move past the activated warning system and cross the railway line.
There is a low occurrence of accidents at UWC and footpath crossings where the sighting distance is poor. This contradicts the
Research at UWCs
confirmed the issue of risk compensation by users, as discussed in the AD Little report. Level crossing users aware of the poor
sight times, perceive the crossing as dangerous and therefore compensate by being extra vigilant. But, where sight times are good,
the user perception of risk is low, and they may adapt their behaviour, acting less cautiously, such as failing to look or look less
often for approaching trains.
Note: the research does not suggest that poor sighting times should be permitted, however it identifies that those with good
sighting times should also be considered as ‘high risk’.
Clear sighting distance of a train at AHB, AOCR and AOCL crossings may also provide vehicle drivers with the opportunity to move
close to the tracks and check for oncoming trains, thus making a decision of whether to cross, during the activated warning system.
Good sighting of the railway line from the road, may also encourage some vehicle drivers to make a judgment that they have
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ar/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) me/an
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 34 Creation date 18.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
St.Margarets CCTV: cars parked
on the side of the road affect the
flow of traffic over the level
crossing. As vehicle drivers
continue to drive across, they
then stop on the crossing because
the cars they are following are
prevented from moving forwards.
Parked cars before and after the level crossing affect the flow of traffic approaching and moving over the crossing.
The are tailgating the car in front to avoid being held at the crossing if the warning system is activated;
They do not expect the level crossing to be activated so soon after the road has just been opened to road traffic again.
As vehicle drivers
progress over the crossing, parked cars in the road ahead of them, coupled with oncoming traffic prevents them from moving
forwards, resulting in vehicles stopping on the level crossing.
Although users should wait until there is sufficient clearance on the other side, before moving forwards, it has been observed on
many occasions that vehicle drivers fail to do this. It is in our opinion that vehicle drivers do this for various reasons:
They fail to comprehend the danger associated with stopping on the crossing;
In our opinion, parked cars are often a result of home owners that do not have off-street parking, leaving their vehicles on the
roadside. Previous railway cottages, now privately owned, are often a source of this problem. Customers of local village or town
shops with limited or no parking also park on the approach and exit roads to level crossings.
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Parked cars
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Parked cars before and after the level crossing may result in vehicle drivers slowing and stopping while on the level crossing.
/3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 35 Creation date 18.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Position of safety
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
trackside position to clearly check for any oncoming trains before moving over the railway line.
track may result in users obstructing the railway line with the bicycle or pushchair.
Footpath and bridleway crossings are often used by cyclists and people with pushchairs. These users will need to stand at a
However, insufficient space trackside
(between the railway line and gate they have just moved through) to stand with their bicycle or pushchair and observe along the
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Insufficient space between the trackside gate and rail results in potential obstruction of the track by bicycles and pushchairs.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/de
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) ar/us
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 36 Creation date 18.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Visitors, workers and local people who use a UWC must all follow the required crossing procedures. However, it is apparent that
users are not complying with the telephone procedures of calling the signaller to request permission to cross. 17 UWC accidents in
the last 10 years are associated with users not using the telephone prior to crossing.
Research has highlighted, for example, a female resident crossing up to three times a day, chose not to use the telephone, because
she regarded the crossing as safe due to good sighting distances. It is also common for regular UWC users to call the signaller only
at the beginning of the day to inform them they will be using the crossing all day but will not be phoning for each crossing made.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Telephone use
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Level crossing users failure to use the telephone is a factor in incidents at UWC.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ar/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 37 Creation date 21.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Traffic moment
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Traffic moment = traverses (by user) per day X trains per day.
Research has identified high traffic moment as a feature of those crossings with accident histories.
Traffic moment is a measure of the frequency of trains and utilisation of the crossing by users.
Research has identified a total of
56% of crossings surveyed to have traffic moments in excess of 1000. A high percentage of these had accident history (44%
versus 12%).
It should be noted that the HSE, Railway Safety Principles, Part 2, Section E, Guidance on level crossings, does not give a maximum
traffic moment for UWC’s or footpath crossings. The only reference to daily road usage (not traffic moment) is that telephones or
MWL’s should be provided on both sides of the crossing when usage exceeds 50. 5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
High levels of traffic moment at user worked crossings increase the chances of an incident.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER st/au
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) ar/au
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) HSE/ra, section E
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 38 Creation date 21.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour crossing.
lines.
Issue at a level crossing
Bainton Green AHB: Contractors
park on the road in front of the
Vehicle drivers
approaching from the Lolham
bridges level crossing are forced
to drive on the opposite of the
road, crossing the double white
maintenance.
location of where the visitor parks their vehicle can influence the behaviour of other road drivers.
‘Visitor’ parking refers to those persons using the level crossing for any kind of associated business with the crossing, i.e.,
It differs from Issue 34: Parked cars, as the position of these vehicles are often located in places other than just on
the approach and exit roads of the crossing.
Because of the remote position of many level crossings, people tend to drive their vehicles when visiting a level crossing. The
For example, if they park in the ‘long/slow’ parking bay this will prevent drivers of long or slow vehicles from stopping and therefore
influence them to drive straight over the crossing without informing the signaller.
Parking on the immediate approach or exit to the crossing may force other drivers to take evasive action, such as driving into the
middle of the crossing or it may cause blocking-back of vehicles over the crossing.
The position of their parked vehicle can also block from view the warning information from other approaching vehicle drivers.
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Visitor parking
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
The position of visitors parked vehicles at a level crossing may affect the behaviour of other road drivers.
/3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 39 Creation date 21.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing utilisation
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
effects on utilisation which may not be captured during specific visits, and therefore suggests that to determine utilisation,
and therefore they are likely to be regular users of the crossing.
dominant risk factor at level crossings that have previous accident history.
Research has shown that 100+ pedestrian users equates to ‘high’ crossing utilisation. It warns of daily, weekly or even seasonal
numerous visits must be made to each crossing.
Where there is high pedestrian utilisation, this usually means the crossing is located as an access point between places such as a
school, a housing estate, places of work or a local shopping area. Pedestrians may be using the crossing a couple of times a day
It is unclear from research the exact behavioural traits of users at
these crossings, however it can be assumed that with continued use, the user becomes less sensitive to the risks posed by the
crossing, resulting in less cautious crossing behaviour. This research has shown that ‘high’ pedestrian utilisation appears to be a
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Level crossings with high crossing utilisation increases the risks to users.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ar/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) HMRI internal report
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 40 Creation date 21.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Lolham Footpath: is used regularly
by the Peterborough Bird Watching
Club for access to a local wildlife
area. Both freight and passenger
trains pass this crossing.
Both passenger and freight trains using a train line route will affect the behaviour of users at a level crossing.
behaviours:
and attempt to cross immediately before the train passes;
a freight train that passes (user’s perception of speed based on their previous knowledge).
Freight trains are often longer than passenger trains and travel at much slower speeds. This may result in the following user
Users knowing they will have to wait for longer periods of time and therefore they may demonstrate increased impatience to wait
Users seeing a train in the distance and judging they have sufficient time to cross because it appears to be or it is normally always
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Type of trains
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of users.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER GI/GN7611
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) ntsb/sa
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 41 Creation date 21.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Vehicle-activated signs
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour sign.
Issue at a level crossing
A 40mph vehicle-activated speed
displays a message relating to the road conditions to specific drivers that are exceeding a particular speed threshold.
the effectiveness of the message could also be applied successfully to advising vehicle drivers of level crossing hazards.
Note: vehicle activated signs are due to be tested at various level crossing sites.
The road industry has devised a range of measures to encourage drivers to adopt a safe speed on the approach to hazards, for
example, junctions or bends. One method currently in use at various sites within the UK, are vehicle-activated signing. The sign
The signs are
effective in reducing the habitual nature of vehicle drivers, resulting in drivers continuing to respond to the messages over a long
period of time.
It has been suggested by the road industry that the benefits demonstrated in reducing accidents at road hazards and maintaining
5. Error type
Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC Undefined
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Over a period of time, vehicle drivers remain responsive to the specific message given by vehicle-activated signs.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER wi/wh
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 42 Creation date 24.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
The occurrence of crossing accidents by vehicle drivers have been associated with specific days of the week.
Saturday and even fewer for Sundays.
The journeys undertaken at weekends differ from those during the week. At weekdays, people are under considerable more
pressure to reach destinations at a specific time, for example, school-runs, work and meetings.
likely to need to meet stringent time scales and therefore be in a more relaxed mind frame, resulting in improved behaviour at
crossings.
rates at level crossings. However, reduced exposure was not judged to be the main factor in the dramatic decrease in crossing
accidents at the weekends.)
There is a higher rate
of crossing accidents at both protected and unprotected level crossings for Monday through to Friday, compared to those for
At weekends, vehicle drivers are less
(Note: the research considered both the reduced road traffic and frequency of trains at weekends and its effect on lower incident
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Days of the week
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
/3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER pi/ve
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 43 Creation date 24.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
Suicide
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
With access onto the UK railways, level crossings could be used by persons wanting to committ suicide. This could have a severe
impact on both railway employees and passengers.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hse/tr
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 44 Creation date 24.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
warning system.
A higher percentage of vehicle drivers cross AOCL’s at between 20 and 40 seconds after the warning system has been activated, a
time at which they are at a greater chance of being hit by a train.
Without a
present.
Automatic open crossings have wigwag lights, but there is no physical barrier that closes the road off to traffic during the activated
Without a barrier present, vehicle drivers or pedestrians can quite easily choose to violate the crossing procedures.
This is often due to vehicle drivers becoming agitated at the time required to wait at the lights and perceiving there to be time
available to cross before the train arrives, or that the system is faulty, resulting in users crossing later in the crossing cycle.
barrier present, vehicle drivers can also move past a point of safety and look for oncoming trains more easily than when a barrier is
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Automatic open crossings
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Automatic open level crossings result in increased risk taking behaviour, later in the crossing cycle.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER vi/re
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 45 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Animals: Horses
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Activated crossings used as access by horse riders, may result in undesirable horse behaviour. The flashing lights and audible
alarms can affect the behaviour of horses on the approach to and while waiting at the level crossing. This may result in horses
moving across the crossing or along the train lines during the activated warning system.
Normal courteous behaviour exhibited by the majority of vehicle drivers are often not followed when approaching a crossing being
used by horses. The vehicle driver not wanting to risk being caught at the crossing, continues to drive at speed. This may frighten
the horse and result in the horse failing to respond to guidance provided by its rider.
Level crossings located on-route to local stables or farm yards may have high numbers of horses and riders using the crossing.
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
UWC Undefined
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
3. Description of issue / design feature
Activated warnings at level crossings may result in undesirable behaviour by horses, and influence the behaviour of other road
vehicle users.
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 46 Creation date 24.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Vehicle tailgating or vehicles following later-on;
First-time or irregular users not aware of the correct crossing procedure.
crossings.
fairly simple.
The most common violation at UWC/MWL was found to be users leaving gates open. Reasons for this behaviour are:
Gates left open during the whole day to allow easier access to homes and places of work either side of the crossing;
Gates open for short periods of the day to accommodate shorter visits, such as deliveries to a farm;
Only one gate closed for the purposes of fencing off the owner’s land;
Adverse weather conditions, i.e., users wanting to reduce the amount of time they are exposed to the weather;
Tractor drivers are the most likely abusers of gate procedures, when their work procedures would require them to undertake multiple
It is suggested that following the correct procedures for gate opening and closing may hinder their work progress.
In general, users perceive the process for crossing correctly as complex, compared with the aim of crossing which is regarded as
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Gate crossing procedure
Crossing type 2. User details
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
3. Description of issue / design feature
The requirement to open and close the gate, following a procedure of crossing the tracks five times, is a factor in why gates are left
open at UWC’s.
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) ar/us
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) th/me
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent bi/hu
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 47 Creation date 28.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Violations at MWL
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
indicates that users feel they have time to make the violation ‘safely’.
take to complete the full crossing procedure. 80% of vehicular users were observed to take longer to complete the crossing
procedure than the actual allocated crossing time.
Users are underestimating the level of risk associated with violating the crossing procedures.
A suggestion of why crossing violations are likely to occur is provided by those users who say they would consider violating a red
warning light.
A combination of underestimating their crossing time and overestimating the time between the warning onset and train arrival
The research suggests, the user is more likely to make a crossing if they believe they have more time than the actual warning time.
Of those that would consider violating a red light at a UWC/MWL, car and truck drivers regularly underestimated how long it would
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Over estimation of warning time and underestimation of crossing leads to risk taking behaviour.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 48 Creation date 30.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Once the crossing closure procedure has been activated, the amber light of the road traffic lights immediately shows for
approximately 3 seconds. After this period, the intermittent red lights immediately show.
activated for provides vehicle drivers with limited viewing time to react and stop prior to the crossing.
Vehicle drivers approaching the level crossing often continue to drive through the amber light stage. The length of time the light is
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Observation of amber light
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The length of activation time of the amber light has little affect on the behaviour of the vehicle driver.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 49 Creation date 30.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Road access
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
behaviour.
may violate the activated warning system.
Vehicle drivers using level crossings that provide the only access to roads and locations within the area, may increase their risk taking
Knowing they will be held at the crossing for some time and without an opportunity to seek an alternative route, they
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
drivers.
Level crossings that provide the only access to routes either side of the crossing influences the risk taking behaviour of vehicle
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 50 Creation date 30.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
vehicles.
Issue at a level crossing
Roydon CCTV: vehicle drivers
parking before the level crossing
to drop passengers off for the
train station. On many occasions,
other vehicle drivers were
observed driving onto the opposite
side of the road, just prior to the
crossing and ahead of oncoming
traffic, to avoid the parked
short periods of time to allow their passengers to exit the vehicle.
also distracts other vehicle drivers from observing the warning information and general road procedures.
Problems are caused by vehicle drivers parking in side turnings or with two wheels on the pavement, close to the level crossing for
This results in traffic flow problems over the level crossing and
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Passenger drop-off points
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Non-designated passenger drop-off points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of traffic approaching a crossing.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 51 Creation date 30.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
See-through effect
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
therefore fail to respond with the required change in vehicle driver behaviour.
and road traffic lights, where the result of the see-through effect has the most adverse impact.
to see any lights at all.
This effect is also an issue for vehicle drivers approaching a level crossing.
regarding the level crossing.
The see-through effect is an established road design effect that results in the failure of the vehicle driver to observe road features and
This effect is most often observed at road junctions
Vehicle drivers approaching a set of
traffic lights continue to drive straight past the red light and have later reported that they have not only missed the red light, but failed
As the vehicle driver looks ahead, the rail line and
surrounding crossing information is lost within the immediate environment because of its position within a dip or on a brow of the
road, resulting in the vehicle driver fixating their vision further along the road. The driver unintentionally misses the information
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Level crossing located in a dip or on a brow of a long straight road may result in increases of red-light running.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER trl/ar
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 52 Creation date 30.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
St.Margarets CCTV: a HGV driver
parked in front of the station. The
driver vehicle completely blocked
the view of the warning light from
approaching traffic.station facilities.
Information signs and warning lights can be blocked from the view of approaching traffic by HGV drivers parking their vehicle to use
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
HGV drivers using rail station facilities
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The effectiveness of information is reduced by HGV drivers parking in front of signs and warning devices.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 53 Creation date 30.06.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
Events
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour September. Horse-trailers,
Issue at a level crossing
Helpston: the Burghley horse trials
are held for a few days each
caravans and the overall increase
in local traffic cause
blocking-back and result in
increased risk taking behaviour at
the Helpston crossing.when visitors may have additional vehicle equipment, such as horse trailers and caravans.
Events can attract enormous increases in visitors to an area, often for only short periods of time and at certain times of the year.
Visitors may be needing to arrive at their destination at a particular time or have a had a long and difficult journey, resulting in users
wanting to avoid any further delays by being held at a crossing. This may result in increased risk taking behaviour by these users.
The general increase in vehicle and pedestrian traffic also affects the flow of traffic on the level crossings, and this is further impaired
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Events increase the amount of irregular users at level crossings.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 54 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour road.
Issue at a level crossing
Lolham CCTV: both sides of this
crossing are accessed by a single
Passing points are provided
further along the road and vehicle
drivers move slowly or stop on the
crossing to accommodate for
oncoming traffic.
Stopping on the crossing occurs
more often during rush hours.
Narrow roads before and after the crossing affect the traffic flow over the level crossing. As vehicle drivers progress over the
crossing, they may have to slow to accommodate the narrow road or stop to allow oncoming vehicles to pass. Vehicle drivers may
have to wait for some time before they can move off from the crossing.
The road infrastructure around the crossing could further impact on the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers. If the narrow roads
force the level crossing users to have to wait for longer periods of time, while other vehicles pass, it may influence them to attempt
to jump the red lights to avoid having to wait.
5. Error type
Issue
Narrow roads
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Narrow roads before and after the level crossing may result in vehicle drivers slowing and stopping while on the level crossing.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 55 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
Contractors
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
to gain access to their land.
development of wind farms in recent years, bringing contractors into areas that require the use of UWC.
Landowners should always inform new contractors of the restrictions and any implications for using vehicles over the level crossing
Users not fully aware of the restrictions the level crossing imposes on their vehicles, may experience problems when traversing the
crossing. For example, while transporting goods they may not be aware of restrictions on vehicle size and therefore unable to
manoeuvre their vehicle easily or without creating an obstruction on the crossing.
In Scotland, crossings only previously used by the forestry commission are now being used by contractors, because of the rapid
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
may increase the risk of an incident.
Landowners failure to inform new contractors of the procedures and restrictions for using their vehicles across the level crossing
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HMRI internal report
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 56 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
creating a queue of traffic over the crossing.
Long traffic queues onto and off of major roads and motorways result in queues forming on either side of the level crossings.
While the crossing is open to road traffic, users do not wait for traffic to exit the other side before progressing across, therefore
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Location near major roads
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
located on roads with direct access to major roads or motorways.
The risk of vehicle drivers blocking-back over the level crossing, or general risk taking behaviour is increased when the crossing is
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HMRI internal report
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 57 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Traffic calming systems
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
approach.
Issue at a level crossing
Helpston signal box: signallers
discouraged the installation of
more traffic calming islands on the
eastside approach to the Helpston
level crossing because of
blocking-back already caused by
islands situated on the westside While the crossing is active, and the road closed to traffic, queues form along the road.
This
creates slow moving traffic and momentarily causes vehicles to block-back over the crossing.
Traffic calming systems positioned on the approach roads to a level crossing may increase the risk of vehicle drivers blocking-back
onto the crossing.
Vehicle drivers position themselves around
the traffic islands, so they are located in a stationary position on the opposite side of the road. When the road is then opened to
traffic again, oncoming vehicles cannot continue along the road because of other vehicles positioned around the traffic islands.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Road traffic calming systems on the approaches to a level crossing may increase the risk of vehicles blocking-back.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HMRI internal report
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 58 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
procedures.
It is also resulting in additional vehicles using UWC, including vehicles completely unsuitable for certain crossings.
Farming is changing the use of its land to ensure the survival of many farming businesses. Instead of using traditional farming
methods, many are encouraging the public to access their land for leisure activities, such as open farms and golf courses.
However, members of the public are using UWC to access farm land, and the types of activities undertaken do not allow for new
users to be informed of how to correctly use these crossings. This results is many untrained users passing through a crossing
which relies upon the user to take full responsibility in opening and closing the gates, ensuring they follow all the correct crossing
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Diversification in farming
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Diversification in farming increases public access to user-worked crossings.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HMRI internal report
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 59 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
followed. Vehicle drivers are unlikely to be familiar with UK procedures and they may also have some difficulty in correctly
interpreting written information.
This is particularly prevalent in areas with high volumes of continental HGV drivers.
Other countries have alternative measures in place for controlling access across level crossings and require different procedures to be
Although they are legally required to be aware of
the rules and procedures for using UK crossings, it is unlikely that all foreign HGV drivers will be aware of these. This may result in
them failing to make any necessary calls to a signaller if their vehicle is too long or slow for passing over a crossing without
previously obtaining permission.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may result in increased decision making errors at level crossings.
evident during seasonal periods.
This may be more
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HMRI internal report
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 60 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 13.01.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
park clear of the crossing.
lay-by;
The local council have allocated the lay-by as an official stop.
A lay-by is often provided at the approach and exit of AHB’s, so vehicles required to call the signaller for permission to cross, can
However, the lay-by is often used as an unofficial bus stop, sometimes preventing large or slow vehicles from stopping, forcing
them to continue across the crossing without calling the signaller.
These unofficial bus stops can arise for various reasons, such as:
The lay-by is closer to bus users’ homes than the official bus stop, and users make a request for the bus driver to stop in the
The bus company is temporarily using the lay-by because roadworks have blocked the official bus stop;
5. Error type
Issue
Bus stops
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Unofficial bus stops in the level crossing lay-by, affects the behaviour of large or slow vehicle drivers.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 61 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
Crossing surface
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Woburn Sands: the crossing
surface was heavily worn in parts
at this level crossing.Poor crossing surfaces increases the difficulty for users traversing the level crossing.
carefully at where they are stepping and this may also increase user crossing time.
horseriders, elderly, visually or physically impaired crossing users.
in general as well as a hazard to trains.
Users may be distracted by having to look
It may present particular problems for cyclists,
The crossing surface may also present a hazard to road vehicles
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HMRI internal report
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) ar/us
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) bi/hu
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent sp/fa
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 62 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Roadworks located on roads around a level crossing can impact on vehicles blocking-back over the crossing. Vehicle drivers
system.
Blocking-back from roadworks is a particular problem at automatic level crossings.
expecting to be able to move forwards over the crossing, may be impeded by slow moving traffic as a result of the road works.
This is further compounded by vehicle drivers tailgating the vehicle in-front to avoid potentially being held by an activated warning
Blocking-back is also not just associated with roadworks located in the immediate vicinity, they may continue to have an impact on
the crossing when located up to 3 kilometres away.
5. Error type
Issue
Roadworks
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Roadworks positioned up to 3 kilometres from the level crossing may still impact on vehicles blocking-back.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HMRI internal report
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 63 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Housing developments
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians over the crossing.
levels and the existing crossing type may be unsuitable for accommodating these increased levels.
Vehicle
housing.
New housing developments near to crossings used as access to major towns or other key locations will affect the use and
These developments will increase vehicle and pedestrian traffic
An additional factor in affecting the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers is the overall congestion of traffic in the local area.
drivers may be less inclined to stop at a level crossing if their overall journey time has increased since the development of new
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ar/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 64 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Vehicle drivers may increase their risk taking behaviour when using level crossings on shortcut roads.
Changes to road infrastructures.
Shortcuts are in themselves a
means of the vehicle driver saving time, and their mindset is one of maintaining movement at all costs. In some cases, the vehicle
driver may be more inclined to attempt to ‘beat the lights’, as waiting at the crossing has a negative impact on their goal of using the
shortcut to save time.
Shortcuts may have been established for a period of time and generally used by regular users to avoid busy main roads. However,
new shortcuts may develop, both permanently and for interim periods, for the following reasons:
Temporary roadworks;
New housing developments;
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Vehicle shortcuts
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER HMRI internal report
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 65 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing instructions
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Users at UWC are provided with instructions to guide them in carrying out the crossing procedure in the correct order.
has a large impact on the overall time taken by the user to cross, as well as impacting on their safety while crossing.
However, it is
not always apparent to users the exact order in which they should undertake the crossing procedure. For example, should they
phone the signaller first to obtain permission to cross or open the first gate. If the user has incorrectly followed the procedure, this
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Ambiguous crossing instructions may result in users failing to undertake the correct crossing procedure.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) Railtrack internal report (ra/hu)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 66 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
The sign ‘ANOTHER TRAIN
Issue at a level crossing
COMING if lights continue to
show’ is positioned underneath
the wigwag lights.
flash.
to confirm whether another train is coming.
attempting to traverse the crossing, especially if they do not see a train approaching.
arrive, and not that they are just being held at the crossing for longer than necessary.
to advise vehicle drivers.
When another train is approaching the level crossing (and without sufficient road opening time), the wigwag lights will continue to
However, the static sign provided to inform users, has minimal impact in providing vehicle drivers with sufficient information
The increase in waiting time at the crossing, increases the likelihood of vehicle drivers
It was suggested that UK vehicle drivers do
not mind waiting, however it is important that they are provided with sufficient information to indicate that another train is about to
A change in audible warning is provided to warn pedestrians of a second train arriving. It is not intended as an information source
However, the second audible warning has been suggested by level crossing users as not being detected
and/or understood (Issue 20).
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Another train approaching
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
information.
The ‘Another Train Coming if lights continue to show’ sign has minimal impact in providing vehicle drivers with sufficient
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 67 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Animals: Dogs
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
restraint.
Train drivers also have reported seeing unrestrained dogs along side the tracks with their owners standing at the crossing.
their dog from the tracks.
capable of maintaining control of their pet.
An observation of users at UWC level crossings saw over a quarter of all people walking with dogs failing to use any form of dog
A sign requesting dog walkers to put their dog on a lead was positioned on the majority of these UWC’s.
There
have also been near-misses and an incident involving a collision between a train and a pedestrian who was attempting to retrieve
It appears that the risk of not restraining a dog is not evident to dog owners, possibly because of their assumption that they are
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Unrestrained dogs may impair their owner’s concentration while on the level crossing.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/de
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) HMRI internal report
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road) bi/hu
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 68 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
line.
Information is provided at UWC to indicate which types of users must call the signaller to request permission to cross the railway
Prior to crossing, all users must determine from this information, whether they should first contact the signaller. However,
non-specific and unclear ‘user-type’ information may result in users failing to contact the signaller.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Contacting the signaller
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Unclear ‘user-type’ information may result in users failing to contact the signaller prior to crossing.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 69 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Rural level crossings
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
drivers.
Rural level crossings, positioned amongst roads with few surrounding roadside structures are often missed by approaching vehicle
The vehicle driver, progressing through country roads, is in a mind-set that is unlikely to be expecting hazard information or
a warning system to appear. They may not register the presence of a crossing until they are nearly driving over it or they may miss it
completely. The problem is further increased when crossings are located on bends, hills or foliage covers information signs.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
The environmental context of a rural level crossing reduces the awareness of approaching vehicle drivers.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 70 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
vehicle too close to the train lines.
locate their vehicle.
Dramatic
surfaces.
Road markings are provided at some level crossings to help vehicle drivers stop their vehicle in a safe location during the activated
warning system. It is important in preventing vehicles from parking underneath the lowering barriers and from positioning their
Road markings that have been worn away reduce the effectiveness of informing vehicle drivers
where they should stop. Markings are also a particularly important element in informing an irregular user of where they should
The importance of road markings in providing vehicle drivers with information has been highlighted by the road industry.
reductions in vehicle drivers running through red lights have been recorded when the ‘STOP’ line has been newly painted on road
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Road markings
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
The effectiveness of vehicle drivers stopping in the correct location is impaired by worn road markings.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 71 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Number of train lines
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Users may perceive a single train line to present less of a risk than double train lines.
crossings.
Therefore users may see the opportunity to
drive over or walk across the lines without observing the activated warning system or by behaving less cautiously at unprotected
This user behaviour is in line with the risk compensation theory; the user perceiving there to be less of a risk to themselves results in
them behaving less cautiously.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 72 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour land.
Issue at a level crossing
Bainton Green: a tractor using the
crossing after leaving nearby farm
Tractors combined with the
position of the crossing on a
straight road, its proximity to
Lolham crossing and use as a
regular shortcut route could
impact heavily on the behaviour of
other vehicle drivers.
vehicles traversing the level crossing.
Farm traffic tends to move at a much slower pace and impacts on the speed and general driving behaviour of other road vehicles.
High volumes of farm traffic using local roads to transport produce or move between farm land will impact on the behaviour of other
This may increase vehicle driver frustration and result in them overtaking on the approach to
and while on the level crossing to avoid being held at the activated warning system.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Location near farms
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
High volumes of farm traffic impact on the speed and behaviour of other vehicles traversing the crossing.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 73 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Commercial traffic
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
having to wait at the crossing, or they may fail to obey the correct crossing procedure at unprotected crossings.
Commercial vehicle drivers, such as salespersons, work to strict timescales and therefore their driving behaviour is often influenced
by having to reach destinations on time. Commercial drivers using a level crossing may be inclined to ‘beat the lights’ to avoid
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 74 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Lolham CCTV & Bainton Green
AHB: vehicle drivers are often held
at Lolham crossing for a
considerable amount of time, and
then also held at Bainton Green.
The lengthy barrier downtimes at
the Lolham crossing, which is
used frequently as a shortcut
route by vehicle drivers adds to
their frustration when they are
held at both crossings.
A road or geographical area may have more than one level crossings located in close proximity.
level crossing and then at the next, and so on, this may affect their risk taking behaviour.
time.
If a driver is required to wait at one
The vehicle driver may become aggitated
at being delayed at each level crossing and exhibit behaviour such as speeding to the approach of the next crossing to try and avoid
being held again or crossing during the activated warning lights.
This risk taking behaviour may be further increased at level crossings with lengthy barrier downtimes on busy rail lines or those with
CCTV, as vehicle drivers know that if they are unable to get over each crossing they may be held at the crossing for a considerable
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Proximity of level crossing to another
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Level crossings located in close proximity to another may influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 75 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Public houses
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
alcohol.
Issue at a level crossing
Tallington CCTV: the public house
is located on the left-hand side of
the crossing. The nearest homes
are located on the other side and
some locals often use the
crossing in their vehicle or on foot
while under the influence of behaviour.
may be an increased chance of being apprehended by the police.
Level crossings on routes between homes and public houses may present additional problems because of the type of users using
the crossing. Users under the influence of alcohol may be more inclined to ignore normal crossing procedures and undertake risky
Rural level crossings may also be used by local vehicle drivers under the influence of alcohol to avoid using main routes where they
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER GI/GN7611
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 76 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
them only applicable to vehicle drivers.
and onto the train line.
barrier.
Both pedestrians and cyclists ignore the activated warning information and barriers on vehicular crossings because many perceive
At AHB crossings, pedestrians and cyclists on the opposite side of the barrier can continue to progress past the line of the barrier
This is a particular problem when there are large volumes of pedestrian and cycle users because of the affect
of group activity on an individual’s behaviour. For example, once a few users have crossed during the activated warning, others will
follow their behaviour.
Users may also unintentionally progress past the barrier line and move onto the train tracks because of the lack of any physical
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Pedestrians on vehicular crossings
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Large volumes of pedestrians and cyclists using road level crossings ignore the activated warning information and barriers.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER va/sa
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 77 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Decision point
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Ware footpath: the user can stand
in various positions to observe for
oncoming trains, however it is
unclear where they should not
stand while observing for trains.
A decision point is the position at which the user can view along both sides of the tracks but not be standing past a point of safety.
This point is designated at 3 metres from the nearest running rail, however it is normally determined by the physical characteristics
around the level crossing, for example, foliage and other obstructions at the side of the line may force the user to stand closer to the
rail lines to ensure they have a clear view. The areas where a user should not stand while observing for oncoming trains may also
be unclear, resulting in users standing in a position that is too close to the railway line.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
An obvious decision point is critical for users at unprotected level crossings.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER hu/de
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) ar/us
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 78 Creation date 27.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
the signaller.
minutes. However,
Additional factors which may further increase the risk taking behaviour of users include:
UWC crossings positioned within long signal sections affect the behaviour of users and the communication between the user and
If a train is within a section, the signaller will normally request that the user calls back after a period of time, for example, in 15
The signaller is then able to inform the user whether the train is now out of the section and past the UWC.
users do not understand why the signaller cannot provide an exact indication of where the train is. The user becomes frustrated at
waiting for an unknown and often lengthy period of time and decides to cross without confirmation from the signaller.
When the user is crossing multiple times during the day;
While the user is waiting, they continue not to see a train for a lengthy period of time and perceive they have a sufficient period of
safe time to cross within;
If one train passes (but another may be within the section) this gives a clear message to the user, “I can go”, without receiving
confirmation from the signaller.
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Signal sections
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Long signal sections increase the risk taking behaviour of users at UWC’s.
/3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ro/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 79 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Combined environmental features
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
of complex environmental features.
An environmental feature on the approach to a level crossing may require the vehicle driver to divide their attention, however they
can continue to concentrate on and manage the information regarding the crossing.
However, the combined affect of many environmental features, such as bends, hills, trees and hedges on the approach to a
crossing, may result in increased decision making errors by the vehicle driver as their attention is diverted in accommodating a range
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
making errors of vehicle drivers.
Level crossings with a combination of environmental features, such as bends, hills, trees and hedges, may increase the decision
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 80 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
road contour.
the contour of the exit road.
their effectiveness in ‘guiding’ the vehicle driver along the road.
Cats-eyes are located along the centre line and left hand-side of the road. They help vehicle drivers to see in advance the changes in
Cats-eyes support approaching vehicle drivers to assess the position of the level crossing in relation to the road and
However, cats-eyes do deteriorate over a period of time and gradually fail to reflect any light, reducing
Cats-eyes are particularly important in rural locations when lighting from surrounding roadside structures will be at a minimum.
5. Error type
Issue
Cats-eyes
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
Deteriorated ‘cats-eyes’ on the approach or on the level crossing may reduce the vehicle driver’s ability to negotiate the road layout
at night.
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 81 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Sign pictogram
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Sign 771, Schedule 3, The Traffic
Signs Regulations and General
Directions 2002
that conveying the appropriate information of protection type prior to each crossing can help users to adapt their behaviour
accordingly.
correct level crossing procedures.
The information presented to the vehicle driver or pedestrian on approaching the level crossing should identify the ‘potential hazard’
ahead of them and support them to adjust their behaviour accordingly.
Subject matter experts in the road industry have suggested the image of a ‘steam’ train does not support users in identifying with
the modern standards of the railway and conveys no relevant information to approaching crossing users. Research has suggested
There is no guidance in how this might affect user behaviour, but in our opinion it may lead to vehicle drivers not following the
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The ‘Puffer’ sign does not convey any directly useful information to users.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER tsr/2002
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) mo/vi
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 82 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
An image of a level crossing from
the Highway Code.
possible.
intervals, and as a minimum are only required to learn the code to obtain a full driving licence.
The current issue of the Highway Code contains 278 rules. Since 1959, the rules have increased from just 90. With this quantity of
rules to remember, the influence on vehicle drivers making errors in interpreting and understanding level crossing procedures is
This is especially relevant considering vehicle drivers are not required to update their knowledge on the highway code at regular
The presence of any level crossings
in the area where a learner vehicle driver is trained may also influence their competence in correctly obeying level crossing rules.
5. Error type
Issue
Highway Code
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The highway code currently contains 278 rules for vehicle drivers.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 83 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Road descents
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
increased. The road industry report increased red-light running at traffic lights when situated at the end of a road descent. This is
also an issue that could apply level crossings.
Vehicle speed is easily increased when travelling downhill, and with increased speed a vehicles stopping distance is also greatly
Previous rail research suggested vehicle drivers may also be concerned at causing vehicle-vehicle collisions if they were to stop
suddenly, which may further suggest why red-light running may be more prevalent at the end of a descent.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Level crossings located at the end of a descent may result in increased red-light running by vehicle drivers.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER pi/re
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 84 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
into the camera at certain times of the day or year).
vehicles, people or other objects.
The position of a CCTV camera varies from crossing to crossing. It may be located to the side of the crossing or positioned at one
end. Various factors influence the effectiveness of the camera location, such as the direction of the sun (which could shine directly
However, the angle at which the camera is positioned also affects the signaller’s ability to assess whether the crossing is clear of
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Signal box: camera angle
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Position of the camera at a level crossing influences the signallers ability to detect objects.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 85 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Passenger compliance with MWL
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
active.
Issue at a level crossing
Farnborough North: there have
been near-misses for both tourists
and regular passengers when they
have crossed while the red light is
the train they have just alighted from.
the active warning system.
When passengers alight at a station, the active red light at the station foot crossing is assumed by passengers to be associated with
Passengers continue to walk across the train tracks, even though the red light is active.
The mindset of a commuter passenger may also contribute to them violating the red light. For example, they may be thinking about
getting home and not concentrating on the immediate surroundings. These passengers may also use their knowledge about train
times to make an assessment that a train is not scheduled to pass so it is therefore acceptable to walk while the red light is on.
Group behaviour may also have an impact on many users choosing to cross once they have seen other passengers do so during
This issue is a problem at many train stations that have a station foot crossing with MWL. To help deal with the problem, some
train companies are reminding passengers via the train public address system not to cross while the red light is active as it may refer
to an oncoming train on the other line(s). 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The red light of a MWL is associated with the train the passengers have alighted from.
3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER rpc/st
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail) Railtrack internal report (ra/ki)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 86 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
him.
Issue at a level crossing
Woodcroft: a train enthusiast went
track-side and refused to move to
a position of safety, as he
believed he was not compromisng
his own safety or those of others.
The BTP were called to remove
This crossing is used
regularly by enthusiasts as it
provides a long clear view of
approaching trains.
barrier to obtain a clear and unobstructed view of passing trains.
Some level crossings attract many train enthusiasts on a regular basis.
local papers, indicating which crossings are suitable for obtaining a good view of particular trains.
The vehicles parked by the enthusiasts on the approaches to level crossings also cause obstructions for other vehicle drivers
Level crossings provide an accessible point onto rail infrastructure and are often used by train enthusiasts, standing inside of the
These are organised meetings and are often advertised in
Level crossings positioned prior
to a curve in the track are often used by enthusiasts as these provide a clear view of the train for a much longer period of time.
approaching the crossing.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Train enthusiasts
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 87 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
School parking
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
The position of these parked cars causes problems for other vehicle drivers traversing the level crossing.
means that vehicles may be parked from some time.
Level crossings in the vicinity of schools are used by parents as accessible drop-off and collection points for their children, with
vehicle drivers stopping on the crossing as well as on the approach and exit roads.
Their attention is diverted
from the level crossing, to concentrate on avoiding and manoeuvering around the parked vehicles. They are also forced to drive
down the centre line, resulting in conflicts with oncoming vehicles. The practice of dropping children at or collecting from school
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC Undefined
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
crossing.
School drop-off and collection points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of other vehicle drivers approaching the
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 88 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
speed.
Issue at a level crossing
A manned crossing in Ridgmont
(Bedford to Bletchley line) is
positioned on a low speed road.
However, its proximity to the M1
motorway means vehicle drivers
continue to pass the crossing at
The attendant at this
crossing has been knocked over
on several occasions.
Different road speeds in close proximity may affect the speed at which vehicle drivers approach a level crossing.
Any small reduction in speed is perceived as considerable, even if it continues to be higher than the lower speed road limit.
The vehicle driver may then continue to cross over the level crossing at a speed which is inappropriate.
This may influence
the vehicle driver in the following ways:
The vehicle driver is conditioned to driving at the higher speed and maintains the same speed on the lower speed limit road;
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Proximity of different road speeds
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
3. Description of issue / design feature
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which vehicle drivers approach
the crossing.
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 89 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Level crossing equipment
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
credible by crossing users.
warning system, if they perceive the warning as false and want to avoid being kept at the crossing for a perceived unnecessary
Operational feedback from experts indicates that level crossing warnings lose their effectiveness when they are not perceived as
Regular users aware that a crossing has frequent reliability problems may choose to ignore an activated
period of time. Certain conditions, combined with this perception may increase the chances of users crossing during an activated
warning, such as having a clear view of the railway line and not seeing a train approach.
The perception of reliability may also affect the behaviour of other users. For example, if people inform others of how unreliable they
perceive the crossing to be, this may influence them to ignore the activated warning system.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The reliability and/or perception of reliability of the level crossing equipment affects the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER le/dr
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 90 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
crossing.
of the crossing. A vehicle driver is less likely to be aware and suitably prepared for the hazard if they cannot see together
was required were seen together.
A user’s detection of a hazard is improved when information about the danger is presented together with the imminent danger.
Therefore, the position of information warning vehicle drivers of the level crossing should be presented while also in view of the
An information ‘void’ that does not convey the message nor the danger together does not strongly reinforce the presence
information about the crossing hazard and the actual level crossing.
The road industry has undertaken similar research on the position of information signs on motorways and the point at which an
action is required by the vehicle driver. The response to a prompt was most evident when the sign and point of where the action
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Position of information
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Perception of a hazard is improved when information referencing the imminent danger are associated together.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 91 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Vehicle speed zones
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
enough.
Issue at a level crossing
Helpston CCTV: The 30mph zone
was positioned to take account of
the amount of homes it had an
impact on. The crossing and
potential approach speed of
vehicle drivers was not considered
as part of the decision process for
positioning the speed zones.
Vehicles coming into the village
are not encouraged to slow early
vehicle drivers approach and pass over the crossing.
The position of incremental speed restriction signs on the approach to a level crossing can have an effect on the speed at which
Towns or villages often have a low speed zone within the central residential areas and then apply an incremental increase in speed
zones as the roads progress further from housing areas. A level crossing situated just on the outskirts of a town or village is often
excluded from the lower speed zones, or positioned too close to the change in road speeds. This fails to accommodate for vehicle
drivers slowing with sufficient time or gradually increasing their speed above the specified limits, so when they are approaching the
crossing they are moving at fairly high speeds.
The allocation of lower speed zones to incorporate a crossing on the outskirts of a town or village would help encourage the speed
at which drivers approach and pass over the crossing, thus having the potential to reduce errors and violations. 5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The position of incremental speed restriction signs influences the speed of vehicle drivers when approaching the crossing.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 92 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
used by vehicle drivers and pedestrians when they are already on the crossing and see the lights being activated. They fail to
continue moving over the crossing, believing the middle section a suitable and safe area to wait until the train passes.
Doubles sets of trains lines can be positioned so that the crossing has a ‘refuge’ point in the middle section. This section is often
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Double train lines
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The space between two sets of double train lines provides users with a refuge point.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER ar/us
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 93 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Distance between gates
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
If the overall distance between the gates is fairly wide, this will greatly increase the overall time taken to undertake the correct
procedure of crossing 5 times. This impacts on the users willingness to comply with the correct crossing procedure.
If there is sufficient space to park a vehicle inside of the gate, but in front of the train track, users will prefer to do this to reduce the
amount of crossings required to manoeuvre their vehicle across the tracks. Instead of following the correct procedure of crossing 5
times, the user only moves across the tracks once. Users benefit through a dramatic saving in time by choosing to park their vehicle
inside of the gate.
However, the user may not be aware that the front of their vehicle might be too close or even protruding over the tracks. UWC users
may also use vehicles of different lengths when crossing, some which may clear the tracks when parked inside the gate, while
others may not. 5. Error type
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
3. Description of issue / design feature
vehicle users.
The overall distance between UWC gates and the distance between the gate and first train line effects the risk taking behaviour of
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 94 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Young people are often happy to congregate around train lines and level crossings. Food and drink leftovers, such as takeaway
cartons and drink cans can indicate that the crossing is not only being used as access but as a meeting place for groups of friends.
The use of crossings as a social area and over a continued period of time may lower the users’ perception of how dangerous the
crossing is, resulting in risk taking behaviour.
5. Error type
Issue
Trespassers
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC Undefined
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Food and drink rubbish at a level crossing is often an indicator of young people using the crossing as a meeting place.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 95 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
Noise
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
line.
Issue at a level crossing
Fox Covert Road Footpath: the
crossing is positioned close to two
roads which pass over the railway
The noise of passing road
vehicles is further increased as
they move over the bridges,
dramatically reducing the users
sense of hearing to check for
oncoming trains.
impair the ability of the user to listen for trains.
visual checks correctly.
protected level crossings.
Users rely heavily on their hearing and/or vision to detect for oncoming trains at crossings without additional protection systems
such as miniature warning lights. Noisy surroundings, such as motorways, vehicle bridges, industrial units, schools etc., may
Noise not only impairs the user’s hearing, it may also affect their ability to carry out
Although the issue of noise is most prevalent at unprotected crossings, it may also hinder the performance of other users at
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER bi/hu
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 96 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
A straight road provides vehicle drivers with improved visibility of oncoming cars, resulting in opportunities for passing slower cars or
traffic queues. This results in vehicle drivers often moving on to the opposite side of the road when approaching and going over a
level crossing. This issue is further compounded if the vehicle at the front of the queue has been progressing slowly and other
vehicle drivers now resent the possibility of having to wait at the crossing.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Straight roads
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
Straight roads increase the opportunities for vehicle drivers to undertake risky behaviour, to avoid having to wait at the level crossing.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 97 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Stereotypical crossing users
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
‘Boy Racer’.
Parents with children;
Coach drivers with tourists;
Taxi drivers with passengers;
Salespersons;
Ramblers;
Cyclists & Motorcyclists.
Users that fail to obey level crossing procedures are not always the stereotypical male in his twenties, sometimes referred to as the
Other groups of users, often perceived as law abiders, are known to cross without obeying crossing procedures. The following
have all been identified as prominent groups of users who fail to follow level crossing procedures:
Middle-aged family women and men;
People from ‘upper-class’ groups;
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
/3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 98 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Passengers are using the activation of the warning lights as an indicator of their train arriving at the station.
moment.
crossing to the other platform once the lights were activated.
Because users are
leaving their decision to progress to the platform on the light activation, users are dashing across the level crossing at the last
Passengers walking on the approach to the level crossing know whether they need to run over the crossing to catch their train, by
observing the warning lights.
At one level crossing, a board has been positioned next to the station car park to block the view of the warning lights from
passengers sitting in their cars. Passengers were waiting in the warmth and comfort of their cars and then rushing across the level
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Train arrival
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Activation of the warning lights is used by passengers as a train arrival indicator.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 99 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
Sightlines
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
This may be a particular problem at AOCL’s because of the lack of any physical barrier across the road.
time, vehicle drivers may creep forward past a point of safety to view along the tracks.
At crossings that have restricted sightlines along the tracks, this may result in users moving beyond a position of safety to view for
oncoming trains along the tracks.
After waiting a period of
Without the driver knowing, their vehicle may
be positioned over the tracks and in the path of an oncoming train.
5. Error type
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Restricted or blocked sightlines may encourage users to move past a point of safety.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER trl/ar
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 100 Creation date 26.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
Rail specific terminology used by the signaller may be misunderstood and incorrectly interpreted by the user.
The information provided by the user also affects the decisions and replies provided by the signaller.
The type of dialogue used between the user and the signaller may affect the behaviour of the user at the level crossing.
Inconsistencies in information provided by the signaller from one call to another may also result in misinterpretation of instructions
by the user. This may come about from heavy use of a crossing, with the signaller having to provide continued feedback to users,
therefore affecting the depth and quality of information provided on each phonecall.
If the user provides inaccurate or false information, or through continued use of a crossing, provides insufficient detail during each
phonecall, this may result in the signaller giving permission for the user to cross when in fact it is unsafe for them to do so.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Communication with signaller
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The dialogue between the level crossing user and the signaller may impact on the behaviour of the user.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER th/er
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 101 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Signal box: detection of objects
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
During rainy weather conditions, the signaller’s ability to detect people or objects through the CCTV is impaired from:
The ability of the signaller to detect objects is also impaired by the following:
Electric trains can interfere with the quality of the CCTV screen image;
Cobwebs on the camera lens also impair the signaller from clearly seeing the full view of the crossing;
side to side.
White and dark clothing can also be very difficult to detect.
or walking over the rubber floor surfaces.
Rain directly hitting the lens of the CCTV camera (even with the use of lens wipers).
Combination of rain and car headlights reflecting light up from the rubberised flooring toward the CCTV camera lens.
Windy weather moves the camera position, omitting different sections of the crossing from the signallers view, as it sways from
If a person is standing near the barrier in white clothing, the signaller can
find it difficult to ascertain whether they are standing outside or inside the barrier. Dark clothing disguises people when standing on 5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Certain conditions impair the signallers ability to detect objects on the level crossing.
/3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 102 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
in their design and level of control measures in accommodating for large vehicles passing over the crossing on a regualr basis.
risk taking behaviour at level crossings to avoid being delayed.
Many disused railway sidings are now being sold off to private companies, who utilise the sidings for holding and transporting large
quantities of heavy goods by HGVs. Level crossings located on the access routes into and out of the sidings are often inadequate
The issue is further compounded by the nature of HGV drivers needing to work within strict delivery timescales, resulting in possible
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Railway sidings
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Alternative uses of railways sidings may alter the type of traffic using a level crossing.
/3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 103 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Emergency services
Crossing type 2. User details
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
No vehicles, including those of the emergency services, are legally permitted to pass the activated warning system at a level
crossing.
Level crossings may present a dilemma of ‘work ethics’ to some emergency service vehicle drivers.
Level crossings located on roads used frequently by the emergency services may result in these vehicle drivers undertaking further
risky behaviour to avoid having to wait at the lights.
An emergency service driver’s perception of risk (when on an emergency call) associated with passing the activated lights may be
lower than the risk compared with not reaching their required destination in time. For example, going through the initial warning
lights and knowing that they will probably miss the train if they go early enough, compared to arriving late at their required
destination and knowing lives may have been lost.
5. Error type
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC Undefined
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
Crossings located on routes used by emergency service vehicles may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
/3. Description of issue design feature
6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
Level crossings: communication and user behaviour issues Ref 104 Creation date 31.08.2004 Last modified 02.02.2005
4. User behaviour
Issue at a level crossing
The ability of the vehicle drivers or other users to detect the presence of a level crossing, hazard information, warning lights or an
approaching train is impaired by fog. The impact of fog on users behaviour may result in users undertaking risky behaviour, such
as failing to take account of warning information or failing to see oncoming trains.
5. Error type
Issue
2.1 Level crossing user type 2.2 Age
1. Level 1.1 Protected 1.2 Unprotected 2.3 On own
Weather: Fog
Crossing type 2. User details
AOCL MCBcctv
AOCR Undefined
ABCL
AHB
MG
MCB
UWC
UWC/T
UWC/MWL
OC
FP/MWL
FC
Undefined Pedestrian
Farmer
Cyclist
HGV driver
Motorcyclist
Passenger
Horserider
Other
Undefined
0-10
11-15
16-20
20-35
35-50
50-60
60+
Undefined
Individual
Group
Undefined
Car driver
Van driver
Train driver
/
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
3. Description of issue design feature
Error
Violation
6. Sources of information 6.1 Interview source 6.2 Level crossing visit - areas 6.3 Document source 6.4 Document details
RAIL INDUSTRY Milton Keynes RAIL INDUSTRY OTHER mp/001
Network Rail ROAD INDUSTRY Doncaster HSE/HMRI GOVERNMENT TRL (rail)
RSSB AA Hertford Network Rail DfT (rail) TRL (road)
HSE/HMRI Bus drivers Peterborough RSSB DfT (road) Independent
RPC Bedford Railway GS Other dept. Non-UK
BTP OTHERS Redcar Others
-PN\YL��� /LSWZ[VU�HUK�[OL�Z\YYV\UKPUN� ]PSSHNLZ��
� ����� 9DOLGDWLRQ�
��� �����������2EMHFWLYH
;OL�]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL�^HZ�JHYYPLK�V\[�[V�HZZLZZ�[OL�MLHZPIPSP[`�VM�HZZPNUPUN�/-�PZZ\LZ�
[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���;OPZ�PZ�H�WYLJ\YZVY�[V�[OL�KL]LSVWTLU[�VM�[VVSZ�HUK�HWWYVHJOLZ�MVY�
0UZWLJ[VYZ����
��� �����������0HWKRG
������������� /RFDWLRQ�
;OL�HYLH�VM�/LSWZ[VU��ÄN\YL������ULHY�7L[LYIVYV\NO��^HZ�ZLSLJ[LK�MVY�JHYY`PUN�V\[�[OL�
]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL���;OL�ZPNUHS�IV_�PU�/LSWZ[VU��X\HU[P[`�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��KPMMLYLU[�
YVHK�PUMYHZ[Y\J[\YLZ�HUK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ�^P[OPU�H�YLSH[P]LS`�ZTHSS�NLVNYHWOPJHS�
HYLH��THKL�P[�HU�PKLHS�SVJH[PVU��
;OL�MVSSV^PUN�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�^LYL�\ZLK�MVY�[OL�]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL"
���� /LSWZ[VU!�4*)
���� 4H_L`!�**;=
���� 3VSOHT!�**;=
���� ;HSSPUN[VU!�**;=
���� )HPU[VU�.YLLU!�(/)
���� -V_�*V]LY[!�-7
������������� 7LPHVFDOH
;OL�L_LYJPZL�^HZ�JVUK\J[LK�V]LY�H�[V[HS�VM�MV\Y�KH`Z���[O�6J[VILY�HUK�� ���Z[�
6J[VILY��������
������������� 3URFHVV
;OL�WYVJLZZ�\ZLK�MVY�HZZPNUPUN�ZWLJPÄJ�/-�PZZ\LZ�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PZ�IYVRLU�KV^U�
PU[V�[OL�MVSSV^PUN�[HZRZ"�H��I��J��HUK�K��ÄN\YL�����
���� ;HZR�H!�ZLSLJ[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WLZ�[V�IL�YL]PL^LK�HUK�L_[YHJ[�YLSL]HU[�/-�PZZ\LZ�
MYVT�KH[HIHZL�
���� ;HZR�I!�PZZ\LZ�YLSL]HU[�[V�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�[`WL�HYL�HZZLZZLK�\ZPUN�º6IZLY]H[PVUZ»��
º7O`ZPJHS�L]PKLUJL»�HUK�º0U[LY]PL^Z»���
���� ;HZR�J!�H�ZL[�VM�ÄUHS�/-�PZZ\LZ�HYL�HZZPNULK�[V�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�
���� ;HZR�K!�UL^�/-�PZZ\LZ�PKLU[PÄLK�MYVT�[HZR�I�HYL�MLK�IHJR�PU[V�KH[HIHZL�
69
-PN\YL��� 7YVJLZZ�\ZLK�MVY�HZZPNUPUN� /-�PZZ\LZ�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�
;OYLL�[LJOUPX\LZ�^LYL�HWWSPLK�MVY�HZZPNUPUN�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�H[�LHJO�VM�[OL�
SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ"�6IZLY]H[PVUZ��7O`ZPJHS�L]PKLUJL�HUK�0U[LY]PL^Z��[HZR�I����
������������ 6IZLY]H[PVUZ
+\YPUN�[OL�]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL��VIZLY]H[PVUZ�^LYL�JHYYPLK�V\[�H[�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���
;OPZ�PU]VS]LK�ZWLUKPUN�WLYPVKZ�VM�[PTL�H[�[OL�JYVZZPUN�HUK�VIZLY]PUN�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�
\ZLYZ���(U`�PZZ\LZ�MYVT�[OL�KH[HIHZL�[OH[�^LYL�JVUÄYTLK�MYVT�VIZLY]PUN�\ZLYZ�^LYL�
YLJVYKLK�HNHPUZ[�H�KH[H�ZOLL[�^P[O�PZZ\LZ�YLSL]HU[�[V�[OH[�ZWLJPÄJ�[`WL�VM�JYVZZPUN��
(SS�VIZLY]H[PVUZ�^LYL�]PKLV�YLJVYKLK��
������������ 7O`ZPJHS�L]PKLUJL
(�YL]PL^�VM�[OL�WO`ZPJHS�HZWLJ[Z�VM�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�HUK�P[Z�PTTLKPH[L�Z\YYV\UKPUNZ�^LYL�
THKL�
;OPZ�PU]VS]LK�]LYPM`PUN�[OL�WYLZLUJL�VM�PZZ\LZ�MYVT�HU`�WO`ZPJHS�L]PKLUJL���-VY�
L_HTWSL��H�ULHYI`�ºYVHK�Q\UJ[PVU»��ºMHYT�SHUK»�PU�[OL�]PJPUP[`�VM�[OL�JYVZZPUN��º[YHMÄJ�
JHSTPUN�Z`Z[LT»�VY�º[`WL�VM�[YHPUZ»���(U�HZZLZZTLU[�VM�[OL�JYVZZPUN�MYVT�H�\ZLY»Z�
WLYZWLJ[P]L��IV[O�VU�MVV[�HUK�MYVT�H�]LOPJSL�^HZ�HSZV�THKL�[V�LUZ\YL�HSS�WO`ZPJHS�
L]PKLUJL�^HZ�JVUÄYTLK���(U`�PZZ\LZ�LZ[HISPZOLK�[OYV\NO�[OPZ�WYVJLZZ�^LYL�YLJVYKLK�
VU�[OL�KH[H�ZOLL[���
:[PSS�WOV[VNYHWOZ�HUK�]PKLV�MVV[HNL�^LYL�[HRLU�[V�YLJVYK�LHJO�PKLU[PÄLK�PZZ\L��
������������ 0U[LY]PL^Z
*VU[HJ[�^HZ�THKL�^P[O�RL`�WLYZVUZ�^P[OPU�[OL�/LSWZ[VU�HYLH���;OLZL�JVU[HJ[Z�^LYL�
\ZLK�MVY�[OL�PU[LY]PL^�Z[HNLZ�VM�[OL�]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL�
;OL�[`WL�VM�\ZLYZ�ZV\YJLK�MVY�[OL�PU[LY]PL^Z�^LYL�JOVZLU�[V�LUZ\YL�[OH[�LHJO�VM�[OL�
MVSSV^PUN�ºJOHYHJ[LYPZ[PJZ»�^LYL�JV]LYLK�I`�H[�SLHZ[�VUL�WLYZVU"
���� 3VJHS�[V�HYLH
���� 9LWYLZLU[LK�JVTT\UP[`�
70
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
2L`! 6�$�6IZLY]H[PVUZ 7�$�7O`ZPJHS�L]PKLUJL 0�$�0U[LY]PL^Z
2 3 ,
���� )\ZPULZZ�\ZLY
���� 9HPS�PUK\Z[Y`�TLTILY
9LZWVUZL�MYVT�[OL�SVJHS�JVTT\UP[`�HUK�YHPS^H`�PUK\Z[Y`�^HZ�MVY[OJVTPUN�HUK�[OL�
MVSSV^PUN�\ZLYZ�HNYLLK�[V�WHY[PJPWH[L"
���� 1VL�+VIZVU��7HYPZO�*V\UJPSSVY�MVY�/LSWZ[VU�
���� 7J�+H]L�9VILYZ[VU��);7
���� -YLK�4HUU��>HYKLU�VM�SVJHS�.SPU[VU�*VSSLNL
���� 4HYR�+LSHPUL�:TP[O��+LSHPUL�)\ZLZ��HUK�KYP]LYZ�
���� :PNUHSSLYZ�H[�/LSWZ[VU�ZPNUHS�IV_
;OL�\ZL�VM�SVJHS�RUV^SLKNL�PZ�H�]HS\HISL�TL[OVK�MVY�NHPUPUN�PUZPNO[Z�PU[V�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�
VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ���/V^L]LY��JVYYLJ[S`�KLÄUPUN�[OL�IV\UKHYPLZ�VM�LHJO�PU[LY]PL^�
PZ�RL`�[V�LUZ\YPUN�[OL�KPZJ\ZZPVU�NLULYH[LZ�/-�PZZ\LZ�HUK�[OL�YLHZVUZ�ILOPUK�\ZLY�
ILOH]PV\Y��HUK�UV[�VU�ºMH\S[�ÄUKPUN»�^P[O�PUKP]PK\HS�\ZLYZ�VY�HU`�PUK\Z[Y �̀��,HJO�
PU[LY]PL^LL�^HZ�WYV]PKLK�^P[O�H�ZL[�VM�N\PKLSPULZ�WYPVY�[V�[OL�PU[LY]PL^��^OPJO�
KL[HPSLK�ZVTL�L_HTWSLZ�VM�/-�PZZ\LZ���;OLZL�L_HTWSLZ�WYV]PKLK�H�MYHTL^VYR�MVY�[OL�
KPZJ\ZZPVU�HUK�MHJPSP[H[LK�\ZLYZ�[V�[HSR�HYV\UK�[OL�PZZ\LZ��LUZ\YPUN�TH_PT\T�V\[W\[�
MYVT�[OL�PU[LY]PL^�
0U[LY]PL^Z�^LYL�JHYYPLK�V\[�^P[O�WLVWSL�LP[OLY�H[�[OLPY�WSHJL�VM�^VYR��OVTL�VY�K\YPUN�
]PZP[Z�[V�[OL�SVJHS�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���;OL�]PZP[Z�[V�JYVZZPUNZ�^P[O�\ZLYZ�JHU�HZZPZ[�PU�
JVUÄYTPUN�THU`�/-�PZZ\LZ���;OL�JVU[L_[�ZWLJPÄJ�LU]PYVUTLU[�Z\WWVY[LK�[OL�\ZLY�
PU�[OLPY�KPZJ\ZZPVU�VM�PZZ\LZ�HUK�OLSWLK�\UJV]LY�HKKP[PVUHS�TPUVY�KL[HPSZ�HIV\[�\ZLY�
ILOH]PV\Y�YLSL]HU[�[V�LHJO�PUKP]PK\HS�JYVZZPUN���
+\YPUN�LHJO�PU[LY]PL^��[OL�/-�PZZ\LZ�WYL]PV\ZS`�JVUÄYTLK�HZ�YLSL]HU[�[V�LHJO�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUN�^LYL�YL]PL^LK��HZ�^LSS�HZ�HSS�/-�PZZ\LZ�YLSL]HU[�[V�[OL�[`WL�Z��VM�JYVZZPUN���
��� �����������)LQGLQJV
;OL�MVSSV^PUN�[HISLZ�SPZ[�[OL�PKLU[PÄLK�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�MVY�LHJO�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN���
,HJO�[HISL�NP]LZ�[OL�YLMLYLUJL�U\TILY��UHTL�HUK�KLZJYPW[PVU�MVY�LHJO�PZZ\L��;OL�
PZZ\LZ�HYL�UV[�YHURLK�PU�[LYTZ�VM�[OLPY�SL]LS�VM�YPZR��I\[�HYL�WYLZLU[LK�PU�U\TLYPJHS�
VYKLY�
(U�PUKPJH[PVU�VM�OV^�[OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�^LYL�PKLU[PÄLK�PZ�HSZV�WYV]PKLK���(�
JVSV\Y�JVKPUN�RL`�OHZ�ILLU�\ZLK�[V�ZOV^�^OL[OLY�HU�PZZ\L�^HZ�PKLU[PÄLK�[OYV\NO�
6IZLY]H[PVU��7O`ZPJHS�L]PKLUJL�VY�0U[LY]PL^���(U�PZZ\L�TH`�OH]L�ILLU�PKLU[PÄLK�I`�
VUL��[^V�VY�HSS�[OYLL�VM�[OL�[LJOUPX\LZ����
������������� *HQHUDWLQJ�LQIRUPDWLRQ�WKURXJK�LQWHUYLHZV
;OL�JVSV\Y�JVKPUN�JSLHYS`�ZOV^Z�[OH[�[OL�PU[LY]PL^�[LJOUPX\L�PKLU[PÄLK�[OL�THQVYP[`�VM�
PZZ\LZ�MVY�HSS�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��MVSSV^LK�I`�WO`ZPJHS�L]PKLUJL�HUK�[OLU�VIZLY]H[PVUZ�
71
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��
5V[�VUS`�KPK�[OL�PU[LY]PL^Z�PKLU[PM`�^OPJO�PZZ\LZ�^LYL�YLSL]HU[��[OL`�HSZV�\UJV]LYLK�
H�IYLHK[O�VM�RUV^SLKNL�HIV\[�[OL�YLZ\S[HU[�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ���;OPZ�HKKP[PVUHS�
PUMVYTH[PVU�VU�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y�OHZ�ILLU�PUJS\KLK�^P[OPU�[OL�KH[HIHZL�
4HU`�VM�[OL�PZZ\LZ�HUK�HZZVJPH[LK�ILOH]PV\YZ�VM�\ZLYZ�^V\SK�UV[�OH]L�ILLU�JHW[\YLK�
[OYV\NO�\ZPUN�Q\Z[�L]PKLUJL�H[�[OL�JYVZZPUN�VY�MYVT�VIZLY]PUN�\ZLYZ�MVY�PU[LYPT�WLYPVKZ�
VM�[PTL���;OL�PUJS\ZPVU�VM�PU[LY]PL^Z�^P[O�SVJHS�\ZLYZ�HUK�[OVZL�MYVT�[OL�YHPS�PUK\Z[Y`�
OHZ�NLULYH[LK�L_[LUZP]L�MLLKIHJR�VU�/-�PZZ\LZ�HUK�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y���
������������� $VVLJQHG�+)�LVVXHV
;HISLZ�HYL�WYV]PKLK�MVY�/LSWZ[VU��[HISL�����;HSSPUN[VU��[HISL�����4H_L`��[HISL�����
3VSOHT��[HISL�����)HPU[VU�.YLLU��[HISL����HUK�-V_�*V]LY[��[HISL����SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���
7OV[VNYHWOPJ�L]PKLUJL�VM�ZVTL�VM�[OL�PZZ\LZ�HYL�WYV]PKLK�H[�[OL�LUK�VM�LHJO�[HISL���
;HISL�� /LSWZ[VU!�4*)
5HI ,VVXH�LGHQWLÀHG 'HVFULSWLRQ 2 3 ,
�� >LH[OLY!�0JL 0J`�^LH[OLY�JVUKP[PVUZ�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO��L_P[�HUK�VU�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
HMMLJ[Z�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� <ZLYZ�MHTPSPHYP[`�
^P[O�H�JYVZZPUN
9LN\SHY�\ZLYZ�HYL�TVYL�SPRLS`�[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�^OLU�
JYVZZPUN���;OVZL�SP]PUN�JSVZL�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�VM[LU�ILOH]L�SLZZ�
JH\[PV\ZS`�^OLU�\ZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
�� =LOPJSL�HWWYVHJO�
ZWLLK
;OL�ZWLLK�VM�[OL�YVHK�[YH]LYZPUN�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�PZ�H�MHJ[VY�PU�]LOPJSL�
KYP]LY�LYYVYZ�
�� 7LKLZ[YPHU�HJJLZZ 7LKLZ[YPHU�HUK�WHZZLUNLYZ�HYL�TVYL�SPRLS`�[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�
ILOH]PV\Y�H[�]LOPJ\SHY�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�^OLYL�IYPKNLZ�HYL�UV[�WYV]PKLK�
�� .YV\WZ 7LVWSL�PU�NYV\WZ�TH`�\UKLY[HRL�TVYL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y��[OHU�^OLU�VU�
[OLPY�V^U��MPN\YL�����
�� ;PTL�VM�KH` 9PZR�[HRPUN�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�K\YPUN�Y\ZO�OV\YZ��H[�TPKKH`��
HUK�H[�[OL�ILNPUUPUN�HUK�LUK�VM�[OL�ZJOVVS�KH �̀
�� 7YLZLUJL�VM�YHPS�
Z[HMM
;OL�WYLZLUJL�VM�YHPS�Z[HMM�PU�OPNO�]PZPIPSP[`�JSV[OPUN�JHU�OH]L�HU�
\UKLZPYHISL�PTWHJ[�VU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y�
�� *SVZ\YL�[PTL ;OL�HTV\U[�VM�[PTL�[OL�\ZLY�L_WLJ[Z�[V�^HP[�H[�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�TH`�
PUMS\LUJL�[OLPY�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�
�� (\KPISL�HSHYT :LJVUK�H\KPISL�^HYUPUN�[VUL�PZ�UV[�KL[LJ[LK�HUK�VY�\UKLYZ[VVK�I`�
SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ�
�� *VUZWPJ\P[`�VM�
MSHZOPUN�SPNO[Z
;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�MSHZOPUN�SPNO[Z�PZ�SPTP[LK�IL�]LPSPUN�NSHYL��SPTP[LK�
SPNO[�V\[W\[�HUK�[OLPY�WVZP[PVU�
�� ;̀ WL�VM�[YHPUZ ;YHPU�SPULZ�^P[O�OPNO�MYLX\LUJ`�VM�IV[O�MYLPNO[�HUK�WHZZLUNLY�ZLY]PJLZ�
TH`�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� +H`Z�VM�[OL�^LLR 9PZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�VU�^VYRPUN�KH`Z�
�� (UPTHSZ!�/VYZLZ (J[P]H[LK�WYV[LJ[LK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�\UKLZPYHISL�ILOH]PV\Y�
I`�OVYZLZ��HUK�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�V[OLY�YVHK�\ZLYZ�
�� 6IZLY]H[PVU�VM�
HTILY�SPNO[
;OL�SLUN[O�VM�HJ[P]H[PVU�VM�[OL�HTILY�SPNO[�OHZ�SP[[SL�HMMLJ[�VU�[OL�
ILOH]PV\Y�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�
72
�� ,]LU[Z ,]LU[Z�PUJYLHZL�[OL�HTV\U[�VM�PYYLN\SHY�\ZLYZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�
�� 3VJH[PVU�ULHY�
THQVY�YVHKZ
;OL�YPZR�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�ISVJRPUN�IHJR�V]LY�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�VY�
NLULYHS�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�PZ�PUJYLHZLK�^OLU�[OL�JYVZZPUN�PZ�SVJH[LK�
VU�YVHKZ�^P[O�KPYLJ[�HJJLZZ�[V�THQVY�YVHKZ�HUK�TV[VY^H`Z�
�� ;YHMMPJ�JHSTPUN�
Z`Z[LTZ
9VHK�[YHMMPJ�JHSTPUN�Z`Z[LTZ�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJOLZ�[V�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
TH`�PUJYLHZL�[OL�YPZR�VM�]LOPJSLZ�ISVJRPUN�IHJR��MPN\YL�� ��
�� 3VJH[PVU�ULHY�
MHYTZ
/PNO�]VS\TLZ�VM�MHYT�[YHMMPJ�PTWHJ[�VU�[OL�ZWLLK�HUK�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�
V[OLY�]LOPJSLZ�[YH]LYZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
�� 7\ISPJ�OV\ZLZ *YVZZPUN�SVJH[LK�VU�YV\[L�[V�W\ISPJ�OV\ZLZ�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�PUJYLHZLK�
]PVSH[PVUZ�VM�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ�
�� ;YHPU�LU[O\ZPHZ[Z ;V�]PL^�[YHPUZ�JSVZLS �̀�WLVWSL�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUNZ�
�� 7YV_PTP[`�VM�
KPMMLYLU[�YVHK�
ZWLLKZ
/PNO�YVHK�ZWLLKZ�PU�JSVZL�WYV_PTP[`�[V�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�VU�H�SV^LY�
ZWLLK�YVHK�PUMS\LUJLZ�[OL�ZWLLK�H[�^OPJO�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�HWWYVHJO�[OL�
JYVZZPUN��MPN\YL�����
� =LOPJSL�ZWLLK�
aVULZ
;OL�WVZP[PVU�VM�PUJYLTLU[HS�ZWLLK�YLZ[YPJ[PVU�ZPNUZ�PUMS\LUJLZ�[OL�
ZWLLK�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�VU�HWWYVHJOPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
� +V\ISL�[YHPU�SPULZ ;OL�ZWHJL�IL[^LLU�[^V�ZL[Z�VM�KV\ISL�[YHPU�SPULZ�WYV]PKLZ�\ZLYZ�^P[O�H�
YLM\NL�WVPU[�
� :[YHPNO[�YVHKZ :[YHPNO[�YVHKZ�PUJYLHZL�[OL�VWWVY[\UP[PLZ�MVY�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�[V�
\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y��[V�H]VPK�OH]PUN�[V�^HP[�H[�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
� :[LYLV[`WPJHS�
JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ
<ZLYZ�^OV�]PVSH[L�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ�HYL�UV[�HS^H`Z�THSL�HUK�PU�
[OLPY�[^LU[PLZ�
��� >LH[OLY!�-VN ;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�]PZ\HS�PUMVYTH[PVU�PZ�PTWHPYLK�I`�MVN�
-PN\YL��� ��!�THU`�`V\UN�JOPSKYLU�\ZL�[OL� /LSWZ[VU�JYVZZPUN��ILMVYL�HUK�HM[LY� ZJOVVS�VU�J`JSLZ�HUK�I`�MVV[���*OPSKYLU� PU�NYV\WZ�\UKLY[HRL�TVYL�YPZR`� ILOH]PV\Y�[OHU�JOPSKYLU�VU�[OLPY�V^U��
-PN\YL�� ��!�;OL�SVJHS�[YHMÄJ�JHSTPUN�ZJOLTL� JHU�JH\ZL�ISVJRPUN�IHJR�WYVISLTZ� V]LY�[OL�JYVZZPUN���(KKP[PVUHS�ZJOLTLZ� VU�[OL�V[OLY�ZPKL�VM�[OL�JYVZZPUN�^HZ� JVUZPKLYLK�PUHWWYVWYPH[L�
-PN\YL��� ��!�[OL���TWO�aVUL�PZ�WVZP[PVULK�]LY`� JSVZL�[V�[OL�JYVZZPUN��HM[LY�H���TWO� Z[YHPNO[�YVHK���0[�WYV]PKLZ�]LY`�SPTP[LK� [PTL�MVY�]LOPJSLZ�KYP]LYZ�[V�HKQ\Z[�[OLPY� ILOH]PV\Y�
73
;HISL�� ;HSSPUN[VU!�**;=
5HI ,VVXH�LGHQWLÀHG 'HVFULSWLRQ 2 3 ,
�� >LH[OLY!�0JL 0J`�^LH[OLY�JVUKP[PVUZ�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO��L_P[�HUK�VU�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
HMMLJ[Z�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� <ZLYZ�MHTPSPHYP[`�
^P[O�H�JYVZZPUN
9LN\SHY�\ZLYZ�HUK�[OVZL�SP]PUN�JSVZL�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�HYL�TVYL�SPRLS`�
[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�^OLU�\ZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
�� 9LWYLZLU[H[PVU�VM�
/.=�\ZLYZ
/.=�KYP]LYZ�MVYT�H�KPZWYVWVY[PVUH[LS`�OPNO�U\TILY�VM�PUJPKLU[Z�H[�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUNZ�
�� ;PTL�VM�KH`� 9PZR�[HRPUN�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�K\YPUN�Y\ZO�OV\YZ��H[�TPKKH`��
HUK�H[�[OL�ILNPUUPUN�HUK�LUK�VM�[OL�ZJOVVS�KH �̀
�� =PZ\HS�JS\[[LY :\WLYMS\V\Z�PUMVYTH[PVU�HUK�YVHKZPKL�Z[Y\J[\YLZ�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO�[V�
[OL�JYVZZPUN�TH`�YLK\JL�\ZLY»Z�KL[LJ[PVU�VM�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�PUMVYTH[PVU�
HUK�^HYUPUN�ZPNUZ��MPN\YL�����
�� *SVZ\YL�[PTL ;OL�HTV\U[�VM�[PTL�[OL�\ZLY�L_WLJ[Z�[V�^HP[�H[�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�TH`�
PUMS\LUJL�[OLPY�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�
�� ;̀ WL�VM�[YHPUZ ;YHPU�SPULZ�^P[O�OPNO�MYLX\LUJ`�VM�IV[O�MYLPNO[�HUK�WHZZLUNLY�ZLY]PJLZ�
TH`�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� +H`Z�VM�[OL�^LLR 9PZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�VU�^VYRPUN�KH`Z�
�� 6IZLY]H[PVU�VM�
HTILY�SPNO[
;OL�SLUN[O�VM�HJ[P]H[PVU�VM�[OL�HTILY�SPNO[�OHZ�SP[[SL�HMMLJ[�VU�[OL�
ILOH]PV\Y�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ��MPN\YL�����
�� 3VJH[PVU�ULHY�
MHYTZ
/PNO�]VS\TLZ�VM�MHYT�[YHMMPJ�PTWHJ[�VU�[OL�ZWLLK�HUK�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�
V[OLY�]LOPJSLZ�[YH]LYZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
�� 7\ISPJ�OV\ZLZ *YVZZPUN�SVJH[LK�VU�YV\[L�[V�W\ISPJ�OV\ZLZ�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�PUJYLHZLK�
]PVSH[PVUZ�VM�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ��MPN\YL�����
�� ;YHPU�LU[O\ZPHZ[Z ;V�]PL^�[YHPUZ�JSVZLS �̀�WLVWSL�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUNZ�
� :[LYLV[`WPJHS�
JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ
<ZLYZ�^OV�]PVSH[L�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ�HYL�UV[�HS^H`Z�THSL�HUK�PU�[OLPY�
[^LU[PLZ�
-PN\YL��� ��!�[OL�HWWYVHJO�[V�;HSSPUN[VU�PZ� JS\[[LYLK�^P[O�`LSSV^�HK]LY[PZPUN�ZPNUZ� HUK�H�`LSSV^�IYHUKLK�WL[YVS�Z[H[PVU��� ;OLZL�HSS�THRL�P[�]LY`�KPMÄJ\S[�MVY� HWWYVHJOPUN�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�[V�PKLU[PM`� [OL�ZPTPSHY�JVSV\YLK�JYVZZPUN�ZPNUHNL���
-PN\YL��� ��!�KYP]LYZ�OH]L�ILLU�VIZLY]LK�PNUVYPUN� [OL�HTILY�SPNO[��HS[OV\NO�[OL`�OH]L�OHK� Z\MÄJPLU[�[PTL�[V�Z[VW�H[�[OL�SPNO[Z���;OL� ]LOPJSL�KYP]LY�HWWYVHJOPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN� JVU[PU\LZ�[V�KYP]L�Z[YHPNO[�V]LY��
-PN\YL��� ��!�ZVTL�\ZLYZ�VM�[OL�SVJHS�W\ISPJ� OV\ZL�\ZL�[OL�JYVZZPUN�^OPSL�\UKLY� [OL�PUÅ\LUJL�VM�HSJVOVS���;OL�);7�OH]L� ILLU�JHSSLK�[V�[OPZ�JYVZZPUN�[V�JSLHY�P[�VM� U\ZPHUJL�\ZLYZ�^OV�Q\TW�[OL�IHYYPLYZ���
74
;HISL�� 4H_L`!�**;=
5HI ,VVXH�LGHQWLÀHG 'HVFULSWLRQ 2 3 ,
�� >LH[OLY!�0JL 0J`�^LH[OLY�JVUKP[PVUZ�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO��L_P[�HUK�VU�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
HMMLJ[Z�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� <ZLYZ�MHTPSPHYP[`�
^P[O�H�JYVZZPUN
9LN\SHY�\ZLYZ�HUK�[OVZL�SP]PUN�JSVZL�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�HYL�TVYL�SPRLS`�
[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�^OLU�JYVZZPUN�^OLU�\ZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
�MPN\YL�����
�� 7LKLZ[YPHU�HJJLZZ 7LKLZ[YPHU�HUK�WHZZLUNLYZ�HYL�TVYL�SPRLS`�[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�
ILOH]PV\Y�H[�]LOPJ\SHY�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�^OLYL�IYPKNLZ�HYL�UV[�WYV]PKLK�
�� ;PTL�VM�KH` 9PZR�[HRPUN�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�K\YPUN�Y\ZO�OV\YZ��H[�TPKKH`��
HUK�H[�[OL�ILNPUUPUN�HUK�LUK�VM�[OL�ZJOVVS�KH �̀
�� 7YLZLUJL�VM�YHPS�
Z[HMM
;OL�WYLZLUJL�VM�YHPS�Z[HMM�PU�OPNO�]PZPIPSP[`�JSV[OPUN�JHU�OH]L�HU�
\UKLZPYHISL�PTWHJ[�VU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y�
�� *SVZ\YL�[PTL ;OL�HTV\U[�VM�[PTL�[OL�\ZLY�L_WLJ[Z�[V�^HP[�H[�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�TH`�
PUMS\LUJL�[OLPY�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�
�� (\KPISL�HSHYT :LJVUK�H\KPISL�^HYUPUN�[VUL�PZ�UV[�KL[LJ[LK�HUK�VY�\UKLYZ[VVK�I`�
SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ�
�� *VUZWPJ\P[`�VM�
MSHZOPUN�SPNO[Z
;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�MSHZOPUN�SPNO[Z�PZ�SPTP[LK�IL�]LPSPUN�NSHYL��SPTP[LK�
SPNO[�V\[W\[�HUK�[OLPY�WVZP[PVU�
�� <ZLYZ�WLYJLW[PVU�
VM�[YHPU�ZWLLK�HUK�
KPZ[HUJL
;YHPU�ZWLLK�HUK�KPZ[HUJL�PZ�\UKLYLZ[PTH[LK�I`�\ZLYZ��^OPJO�TH`�YLZ\S[�
PU�PUJYLHZLK�KLJPZPVU�THRPUN�LYYVYZ�I`�\ZLYZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�
�� -VSPHNL�VU�
YVHKZPKL
;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO�[V�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
PZ�YLK\JLK�I`�V]LYNYV^U�MVSPHNL��MPN\YL�����
�� ;̀ WL�VM�[YHPUZ ;YHPU�SPULZ�^P[O�OPNO�MYLX\LUJ`�VM�IV[O�MYLPNO[�HUK�WHZZLUNLY�ZLY]PJLZ�
TH`�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� +H`Z�VM�[OL�^LLR 9PZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�VU�^VYRPUN�KH`Z�
�� (UPTHSZ!�/VYZLZ (J[P]H[LK�WYV[LJ[LK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�\UKLZPYHISL�ILOH]PV\Y�
I`�OVYZLZ��HUK�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�V[OLY�YVHK�]LOPJSL�\ZLYZ�
�� 6IZLY]H[PVU�VM�
HTILY�SPNO[
;OL�SLUN[O�VM�HJ[P]H[PVU�VM�[OL�HTILY�SPNO[�OHZ�SP[[SL�HMMLJ[�VU�[OL�
ILOH]PV\Y�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�
�� /V\ZPUN�
KL]LSVWTLU[Z
/V\ZPUN�KL]LSVWTLU[Z�PUJYLHZL�YVHK�[YHMMPJ�HUK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZL�
�� 9VHK�THYRPUNZ ;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�Z[VWWPUN�PU�[OL�JVYYLJ[�SVJH[PVU�PZ�
PTWHPYLK�I`�^VYU�YVHK�THYRPUNZ��
�� 3VJH[PVU�ULHY�
MHYTZ
/PNO�]VS\TLZ�VM�MHYT�[YHMMPJ�PTWHJ[�VU�[OL�ZWLLK�HUK�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�
V[OLY�]LOPJSLZ�[YH]LYZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
�� ;YHPU�LU[O\ZPHZ[Z ;V�]PL^�[YHPUZ�JSVZLS �̀�WLVWSL�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUNZ�
�� 7YV_PTP[`�VM�
KPMMLYLU[�YVHK�
ZWLLKZ
/PNO�YVHK�ZWLLKZ�PU�JSVZL�WYV_PTP[`�[V�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�VU�H�SV^LY�
ZWLLK�YVHK�PUMS\LUJLZ�[OL�ZWLLK�H[�^OPJO�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�HWWYVHJO�[OL�
JYVZZPUN��MPN\YL������
� +V\ISL�[YHPU�SPULZ ;OL�ZWHJL�IL[^LLU�[^V�ZL[Z�VM�KV\ISL�[YHPU�SPULZ�WYV]PKLZ�\ZLYZ�^P[O�H�
YLM\NL�WVPU[�
75
� :[LYLV[`WPJHS�
JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ
<ZLYZ�^OV�]PVSH[L�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ�HYL�UV[�HS^H`Z�THSL�HUK�PU�
[OLPY�[^LU[PLZ�
��� >LH[OLY!�-VN ;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�]PZ\HS�PUMVYTH[PVU�PZ�PTWHPYLK�I`�MVN�
-PN\YL��� ��!��SVJHS�\ZLYZ�SP]PUN�UL_[�[V�[OL� JYVZZPUN�OH]L�JVUZPZ[LU[S`�\UKLY[HRLU� YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�^OLU�JYVZZPUN�H[�4H_L �̀��
;HISL�� 3VSOHT!�**;=
-PN\YL��� ��!��[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�ZPNU��WVZP[PVULK� VU�[OL�SLM[�OHUK�ZPKL�PZ�VIZJ\YLK�MYVT� [OL�]LOPJSL�KYP]LY»Z�]PL �̂��
-PN\YL��� ��!�[OL���TWO�aVUL�PZ�WVZP[PVULK�JSVZL� [V�[OL�JYVZZPUN��HM[LY�H���TWO�aVUL�VU�H� SVUN�Z[YHPNO[�YVHK���
5HI ,VVXH�LGHQWLÀHG 'HVFULSWLRQ 2 3 ,
�� >LH[OLY!�0JL 0J`�^LH[OLY�JVUKP[PVUZ�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO��L_P[�HUK�VU�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
HMMLJ[Z�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� <ZLYZ�MHTPSPHYP[`�
^P[O�H�JYVZZPUN
9LN\SHY�\ZLYZ�HUK�[OVZL�SP]PUN�JSVZL�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�HYL�TVYL�SPRLS`�
[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�\ZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN���
�� *SVZ\YL�[PTL ;OL�HTV\U[�VM�[PTL�[OL�\ZLY�L_WLJ[Z�[V�^HP[�H[�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�TH`�
PUMS\LUJL�[OLPY�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�
�� -VSPHNL�VU�
YVHKZPKL
;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO�[V�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
PZ�YLK\JLK�I`�V]LYNYV^U�MVSPHNL�
�� ;̀ WL�VM�[YHPUZ ;YHPU�SPULZ�^P[O�OPNO�MYLX\LUJ`�VM�IV[O�MYLPNO[�HUK�WHZZLUNLY�ZLY]PJLZ�
TH`�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� +H`Z�VM�[OL�^LLR 9PZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�VU�^VYRPUN�KH`Z�
�� (UPTHSZ!�/VYZLZ (J[P]H[LK�WYV[LJ[LK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�\UKLZPYHISL�ILOH]PV\Y�
I`�OVYZLZ��HUK�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�V[OLY�YVHK�\ZLYZ�
�� 6IZLY]H[PVU�VM�
HTILY�SPNO[
;OL�SLUN[O�VM�HJ[P]H[PVU�VM�[OL�HTILY�SPNO[�OHZ�SP[[SL�HMMLJ[�VU�[OL�
ILOH]PV\Y�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�
�� 5HYYV^�YVHKZ 5HYYV^�YVHKZ�ILMVYL�HUK�HM[LY�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�KYP]LYZ�
ZSV^PUN�HUK�Z[VWWPUN�^OPSL�VU�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN��MPN\YL�����
�� =LOPJSL�ZOVY[J\[Z 3L]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�VU�YVHKZ�\ZLK�HZ�ZOVY[J\[Z�YLZ\S[�PU�PUJYLHZLK�YPZR�
[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�I`�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ��MPN\YL�����
�� 9VHK�THYRPUNZ ;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�KYP]LYZ�Z[VWWPUN�PU�[OL�JVYYLJ[�SVJH[PVU�PZ�PTWHPYLK�
I`�^VYU�YVHK�THYRPUNZ��
�� 3VJH[PVU�ULHY�
MHYTZ
/PNO�]VS\TLZ�VM�MHYT�[YHMMPJ�PTWHJ[�VU�[OL�ZWLLK�HUK�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�
V[OLY�]LOPJSLZ�[YH]LYZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
76
�� 7YV_PTP[`�VM�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUNZ�[V�
HUV[OLY
3L]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�SVJH[LK�PU�JSVZL�WYV_PTP[`�VM�HUV[OLY�TH`�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�
YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ��MPN\YL�� ���
�� 7\ISPJ�OV\ZLZ *YVZZPUN�SVJH[LK�VU�YV\[L�[V�W\ISPJ�OV\ZLZ�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�PUJYLHZLK�
]PVSH[PVUZ�VM�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ��
�� *H[Z�L`LZ +L[LYPVYH[LK�JH[Z�L`LZ�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO�VY�VU�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�TH`�
YLK\JL�[OL�]LOPJSL�KYP]LY»Z�HIPSP[`�[V�ULNV[PH[L�[OL�YVHK�SH`V\[�H[�UPNO[�
�� ;YHPU�LU[O\ZPHZ[Z ;V�]PL^�[YHPUZ�JSVZLS �̀�WLVWSL�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�
JYVZZPUNZ�
� :[LYLV[`WPJHS�
JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ
<ZLYZ�^OV�]PVSH[L�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ�HYL�UV[�HS^H`Z�THSL�HUK�PU�
[OLPY�[^LU[PLZ�
��� >LH[OLY!�-VN ;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�]PZ\HS�PUMVYTH[PVU�PZ�PTWHPYLK�I`�MVN�
-PN\YL��� ��!�[OL�HWWYVHJOLZ�[V�IV[O�ZPKLZ�VM� 3VSOHT�IYPKNLZ�PZ�]LY`�UHYYV �̂��;OLYL�PZ� VUS`�YVVT�MVY�VUL�]LOPJSL�[V�WHZZ�H[�H� [PTL���
;HISL�� )HPU[VU�.YLLU!�(/)
-PN\YL�� ��!�[OL�3VSOHT�IYPKNLZ�JYVZZPUN�PZ� WVZP[PVULK�PU�JSVZL�WYV_PTP[`�[V�)HPU[VU� .YLLU���(M[LY�ILPUN�OLSK�H[�3VSOHT��THU`� ]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�ZWLLK�HSVUN�[OL�Z[YHPNO[� YVHK�[V�H]VPK�ILPUN�JH\NO[�H[�[OL�UL_[� JYVZZPUN���
-PN\YL��� ��!�[OL�3VSOHT�IYPKNLZ�JYVZZPUN�PZ�VM[LU� \ZLK�HZ�H�ZOVY[J\[�MVY�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ� H]VPKPUN�[OL�I\Z`�(��IL[^LLU�:[HTMVYK� HUK�7L[LYIVYV\NO���
5HI ,VVXH�LGHQWLÀHG 'HVFULSWLRQ 2 3 ,
�� <ZLYZ�MHTPSPHYP[`�
^P[O�H�JYVZZPUN
9LN\SHY�\ZLYZ�HYL�TVYL�SPRLS`�[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�^OLU�
JYVZZPUN���;OVZL�SP]PUN�JSVZL�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�VM[LU�ILOH]L�SLZZ�
JH\[PV\ZS`�^OLU�\ZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�
�� 9VHK�Q\UJ[PVUZ 9VHK�Q\UJ[PVUZ�JSVZL�[V�[OL�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�PUJYLHZLK�
KLJPZPVU�THRPUN��WVZZPISL�LYYVYZ�I`�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�HUK�ISVJRPUN�IHJR�
V]LY�[OL�JYVZZPUN��MPN\YL�����
�� =LOPJSL�HWWYVHJO�
ZWLLK
;OL�ZWLLK�VM�[OL�YVHK�[YH]LYZPUN�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�PZ�H�MHJ[VY�PU�]LOPJSL�
KYP]LY�LYYVYZ�
�� 7YLZLUJL�VM�YHPS�
Z[HMM
;OL�WYLZLUJL�VM�YHPS�Z[HMM�PU�OPNO�]PZPIPSP[`�JSV[OPUN�JHU�OH]L�HU�
\UKLZPYHISL�PTWHJ[�VU�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�\ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y�
�� :\USPNO[�Z[YVIPUN :\USPNO[�WHZZPUN�[OYV\NO�SPULZ�VM�[YLLZ�WVZP[PVULK�VU�[OL�ZPKL�VM�[OL�
YVHK��PTWHY[Z�H�Z[YVIPUN�LMMLJ[�VU�[OL�YVHK�^OPJO�TH`�PTWHPY�[OL�
]PZPIPSP[`�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�
77
�� /HSM�IHYYPLY (\[VTH[PJ�OHSM�IHYYPLYZ�MHJPSP[H[L�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR�[HRPUN�
ILOH]PV\Y��MPN\YL�����
�� <ZLY�WLYJLW[PVU�
VM�[YHPU�ZWLLK�HUK�
KPZ[HUJL
;YHPU�ZWLLK�HUK�KPZ[HUJL�PZ�\UKLYLZ[PTH[LK�I`�\ZLYZ��^OPJO�TH`�
PUJYLHZL�[OL�KLJPZPVU�THRPUN�LYYVYZ�VM�\ZLYZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��
�� -VSPHNL�VU�
YVHKZPKL
;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�VU�[OL�HWWYVHJO�[V�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�PZ�
YLK\JLK�I`�V]LYNYV^U�MVSPHNL��
�� =PZP[VY�WHYRPUN ;OL�WVZP[PVU�VM�]PZP[VY»Z�WHYRLK�]LOPJSLZ�H[�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�TH`�HMMLJ[�
[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�V[OLY�YVHK�\ZLYZ��
�� ;̀ WL�VM�[YHPUZ ;YHPU�SPULZ�^P[O�OPNO�MYLX\LUJ`�VM�IV[O�MYLPNO[�HUK�WHZZLUNLY�ZLY]PJLZ�
TH`�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� +H`Z�VM�[OL�^LLR 9PZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�PUJYLHZLZ�VU�^VYRPUN�KH`Z�
�� (UPTHSZ!�/VYZLZ (J[P]H[LK�WYV[LJ[LK�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�\UKLZPYHISL�ILOH]PV\Y�
I`�OVYZLZ��HUK�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�V[OLY�YVHK�\ZLYZ�
�� 6IZLY]H[PVU�VM�
HTILY�SPNO[
;OL�SLUN[O�VM�HJ[P]H[PVU�VM�[OL�HTILY�SPNO[�OHZ�SP[[SL�HMMLJ[�VU�[OL�
ILOH]PV\Y�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�
�� =LOPJSL�ZOVY[J\[Z 3L]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�VU�YVHKZ�\ZLK�HZ�ZOVY[J\[Z�YLZ\S[�PU�PUJYLHZLK�YPZR�
[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�I`�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ���
�� 3VJH[PVU�ULHY�
MHYTZ
/PNO�]VS\TLZ�VM�MHYT�[YHMMPJ�PTWHJ[�VU�[OL�ZWLLK�HUK�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�
V[OLY�]LOPJSLZ�[YH]LYZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN��MPN\YL�����
�� 7YV_PTP[`�VM�
SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[V�
HUV[OLY
3L]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�SVJH[LK�PU�JSVZL�WYV_PTP[`�[V�HUV[OLY�TH`�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�
YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ���
�� 7\ISPJ�OV\ZLZ *YVZZPUN�SVJH[LK�VU�YV\[L�[V�W\ISPJ�OV\ZLZ�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�PUJYLHZLK�
]PVSH[PVUZ�VM�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ�
� :[YHPNO[�YVHKZ :[YHPNO[�YVHKZ�PUJYLHZL�[OL�VWWVY[\UP[PLZ�MVY�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�[V�
\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y��[V�H]VPK�OH]PUN�[V�^HP[�H[�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�
� :[LYLV[`WPJHS�
JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ
<ZLYZ�^OV�]PVSH[L�JYVZZPUN�WYVJLK\YLZ�HYL�UV[�HS^H`Z�THSL�HUK�PU�[OLPY�
[^LU[PLZ�
��� >LH[OLY!�-VN ;OL�LMMLJ[P]LULZZ�VM�]PZ\HS�PUMVYTH[PVU�PZ�PTWHPYLK�I`�MVN�
-PN\YL��� ��!�[^V�YVHK�Q\UJ[PVUZ�JYVZZ�ILMVYL� SLHKPUN�[V�)HPU[VU�.YLLU�JYVZZPUN��� ;OL�JVTWSL_P[`�VM�[OPZ�Q\UJ[PVU�SLHKZ� [V�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�OH]PUN�[V�MVJ\Z�VU� H�]HYPL[`�VM�KPMMLYLU[�PUMVYTH[PVU�J\LZ�� LZWLJPHSS`�K\YPUN�Y\ZO�OV\YZ�^OLU�[OPZ�PZ� \ZLK�HZ�H�ZOVY[J\[�YV\[L���
-PN\YL��� ��!�)HPU[VU�.YLLU�PZ�H�OHSM�IHYYPLY� JYVZZPUN���APN�aHNNPUN�OHZ�ILLU� VIZLY]LK�I`�SVJHSZ���
78
-PN\YL��� ��!�[OL�YV\[L�V]LY�)HPU[VU�PZ�\ZLK� OLH]PS`�I`�SVJHS�MHYTLYZ���;OL�Z[YHPNO[� YVHK�HUK�ZOVY[J\[�YV\[L�JVTIPULK� ^P[O�ZSV^�MHYTPUN�[YHMÄJ�TH`�PUÅ\LUJL� ZVTL�]LOPJSL�KYP]LYZ�[V�V]LY[HRL�^OPSL� HWWYVHJOPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN��
;HISL�� -V_�*V]LY[!�-7
5HI ,VVXH�LGHQWLÀHG 'HVFULSWLRQ 2 3 ,
�� <ZLYZ�MHTPSPHYP[`�
^P[O�H�JYVZZPUN
9LN\SHY�\ZLYZ�HUK�[OVZL�SP]PUN�JSVZL�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�HYL�TVYL�SPRLS`�
[V�\UKLY[HRL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y�^OLU�\ZPUN�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��MPN\YL�����
�� -YLX\LUJ`�VM�
[YHPUZ
*YVZZPUN�^P[O�H�SV^�MYLX\LUJ`�VM�[YHPUZ�HYL�SPRLS`�[V�PUJYLHZL�[OL�YPZR�
[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�YLN\SHY�\ZLYZ��MPN\YL�����
�� 9LN\SHYP[`��VM�
[YHPUZ
=HYPH[PVUZ�PU�[YHPU�ZJOLK\SLZ��Z\JO�HZ�LUNPULLYPUN�^VYR��\UL_WLJ[LK�
KLSH`Z�[V�[YHPU�ZLY]PJLZ��HUK�SPUL�ZWLLK�YLZ[YPJ[PVUZ�L[J���HSS�JVU[YPI\[L�
[V�MS\J[\H[PVUZ�PU�[YHPUZ�WHZZPUN�H�WVPU[�H[�H�Z\WWVZLKS`�ºRUV^U»�[PTL��
�� .YV\WZ 7LVWSL�PU�NYV\WZ�TH`�\UKLY[HRL�TVYL�YPZR`�ILOH]PV\Y��[OHU�^OLU�VU�
[OLPY�V^U�
�� ;PTL�VM�KH` 9PZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�PUJYLHZLZ�K\YPUN�Y\ZO�OV\YZ��H[�TPKKH`�HUK�H[�
[OL�ILNPUUPUN�HUK�LUK�VM�[OL�ZJOVVS�KH �̀
�� +HYRULZZ <UWYV[LJ[LK�JYVZZPUNZ�\ZLK�K\YPUN�OV\YZ�VM�KHYRULZZ�TH`�SLHK�[V�
PUJYLHZLK�KLJPZPVU�THRPUN�LYYVYZ�I`�JYVZZPUN�\ZLYZ��
�� <ZLY�WLYJLW[PVU�
VM�[YHPU�ZWLLK�HUK�
KPZ[HUJL
;YHPU�ZWLLK�HUK�KPZ[HUJL�PZ�\UKLYLZ[PTH[LK�I`�\ZLYZ��^OPJO�TH`�
PUJYLHZL�[OL�KLJPZPVU�THRPUN�LYYVYZ�VM�\ZLYZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��
�� ;YLZWHZZPUN�VU�YHPS�
Z[Y\J[\YLZ
9HPS�Z[Y\J[\YLZ�SVJH[LK�H[�[OL�LU[YHUJL�HUK�L_P[�HYLHZ�[V�JYVZZPUNZ�
[OH[�HWWLHY�Z\P[HISL�MVY�JSPTIPUN�TH`�YLZ\S[�PU�\UKLZPYHISL�YPZR�[HRPUN�
ILOH]PV\Y�I`�TLTILYZ�VM�[OL�W\ISPJ���
�� ;YHPU�ZWLLKZ 3V^�[YHPU�ZWLLKZ�TH`�PUJYLHZL�[OL�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ�
�� :PNO[PUN�KPZ[HUJL .VVK�ZPNO[PUN�KPZ[HUJL�ZOV\SK�PUKPJH[L�[OL�JYVZZPUN�HZ�OPNO�YPZR��MPN\YL��
����
� *YVZZPUN�
\[PSPZH[PVU
3L]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�^P[O�OPNO�JYVZZPUN�\[PSPZH[PVU�PUJYLHZLZ�[OL�YPZRZ�[V�
\ZLYZ��
�� ;̀ WL�VM�[YHPUZ ;YHPU�SPULZ�^P[O�OPNO�MYLX\LUJ`�VM�IV[O�MYLPNO[�HUK�WHZZLUNLY�ZLY]PJLZ�
TH`�PUMS\LUJL�[OL�YPZR�[HRPUN�ILOH]PV\Y�VM�\ZLYZ��
� ;YLZWHZZLYZ -VVK�HUK�KYPUR�Y\IIPZO�H[�H�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�PZ�VM[LU�HU�PUKPJH[VY�VM�
`V\UN�WLVWSL�\ZPUN�[OL�JYVZZPUN�HZ�H�TLL[PUN�WSHJL��MPN\YL�����
� 5VPZL 5VPZ`�Z\YYV\UKPUNZ�TH`�PTWHPY�[OL�WLYMVYTHUJL�VM�\ZLYZ�[V�KL[LJ[�
[YHPUZ�H[�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ��MPN\YL�����
-PN\YL��� ��!�YHPS^H`�JVUZ[Y\J[PVU�TH[LYPHS�OHK� ILLU�SLM[�HSVUNZPKL�[OL�JYVZZPUN��^P[O� LHZ`�HJJLZZ�MVY�JOPSKYLU��� �!�L]PKLUJL�VM�MVVK�HUK�KYPUR�Y\IIPZO� PUKPJH[LK�P[�^HZ�\ZLK�HZ�H�TLL[PUN� WSHJL�
-PN\YL��� ��!�[OL�ZPNO[PUN�KPZ[HUJL�PZ�SVUN�PU�IV[O� KPYLJ[PVUZ��HUK�MYVT�IV[O�ZPKLZ�VM�[OL� JYVZZPUN��� �!�[OL�SVJHS�I`�WHZZ�IYPKNL�PU�[OL� KPZ[HUJL�WYVK\JLZ�JVUZPKLYHISL�UVPZL� MYVT�WHZZPUN�]LOPJSLZ��
79
-PN\YL��� ��!��SVJHS�ZJOVVS�JOPSKYLU�\ZL�[OPZ� JYVZZPUN�VU�H�YLN\SHY�IHZPZ���;OPZ�J`JSL� YPKLY�MHPSLK�[V�SVVR�^OLU�JYVZZPUN��� ��!��[OL�J`JSPZ[�HSZV�JVTTLU[LK�VU�[OL� SV^�MYLX\LUJ`�VM�[YHPUZ��HUK�VM[LU�UL]LY� ZLLPUN�H�[YHPU�^OLU�JYVZZPUN�PU�[OL� TVYUPUN�VY�L]LUPUN�
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
��� �����������)HDVLELOLW\�RI�UDQNLQJ�LVVXHV
;OL�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�PKLU[PÄLK�MYVT�[OL�]HSPKH[PVU�L_LYJPZL�OH]L�UV[�ILLU�YHURLK�
PU�[LYTZ�VM�[OLPY�PTWVY[HUJL�VY�I`�SL]LS�VM�YPZR���;OL�PU[LY]PL^�[LJOUPX\L�WYV]PKLZ�HU�
L_JLSSLU[�ZV\YJL�MVY�LZ[HISPZOPUN�^OH[�PZZ\LZ�KV�L_PZ[��OV^L]LY�ZVTL�PZZ\LZ�TH`�OH]L�
TVYL�VM�HU�PTWHJ[�VU�JLY[HPU�PUKP]PK\HSZ���;OLYLMVYL�HU`�Z`Z[LT�VM�YHURPUN�^V\SK�IL�
NYLH[S`�KLWLUKLU[�\WVU�OV^�PTWVY[HU[�[OL`�^LYL�[V�H�SVJHS�\ZLY���
��� �����������9DOXH�RI�WKH�YDOLGDWLRQ�H[HUFLVH
;OL�HWWSPJH[PVU�VM�6IZLY]H[PVUZ��7O`ZPJHS�L]PKLUJL�HUK�0U[LY]PL^Z�OHZ�ILLU�
Z\JJLZZM\S�PU�HZZPNUPUN�O\THU�MHJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�[V�SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ���;OPZ�WYVJLZZ�^PSS�IL�
\ZLK�HZ�H�N\PKL�MVY�KL]LSVWPUN�[OL�[VVSZ�HUK�HWWYVHJOLZ�MVY�0UZWLJ[VYZ��
�
(�TH[YP_�VM�HSS�KH[HIHZL�PZZ\LZ�PZ�WYV]PKLK�PU�HWWLUKP_�)���0[�WYV]PKLZ�HU�V]LY]PL^�VM�
[OVZL�PZZ\LZ�HZZPNULK�H[�LHJO�JYVZZPUN�HUK�[OL�TL[OVK�I`�^OPJO�PZ�^HZ�JVUÄYTLK���
80
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
5HIHUHQFHV (SS�YLMLYLUJLZ�HYL�JVKLK�[V�OLSW�PKLU[PM`�[OL�ZV\YJLZ�VM�PUMVYTH[PVU�PUJS\KLK�^P[OPU�
[OL�KH[HIHZL���.LULYHSS �̀�JVKPUN�PZ�HWWSPLK�I`�\ZPUN�[OL�ÄYZ[�[^V�SL[[LYZ�VM�[OL�H\[OVYZ�
Z\YUHTL�HUK�[OLU�[OL�ÄYZ[�[^V�SL[[LYZ�VM�[OL�KVJ\TLU[�[P[SL��
0�L���:LSKL��.�1�:���/H �̀�4�*�� �)YP[LZ��1�5���� � ��$Q�DQDO\VLV�RI�YLGHR�UHFRUGHG� GULYHU�EHKDYLRXU�DW�OHYHO�UDLOZD\�FURVVLQJV���7YVJLLKPUNZ�VM�[OL�/\THU�-HJ[VYZ�
(ZZVJPH[PVU�VM�*HUHKH���UK�(UU\HS�*VUMLYLUJL��;VYVU[V��6U[HYPV��� � ��WW���������
B^P�HUD�
-VY�KVJ\TLU[Z�^P[O�HU�VYNHUPZH[PVU�HZ�[OL�H\[OVY��Z\JO�HZ�/LHS[O� �:HML[`�,_LJ\[P]L��
VY�(\Z[YHSPHU�;YHUZWVY[�*V\UJPS��[OL�VYNHUPZH[PVUZ�HJYVU`T�^PSS�IL�\ZLK�HUK�[OLU�
MVSSV^LK�I`�[OL�ÄYZ[�[^V�SL[[LYZ�VM�[OL�KVJ\TLU[�[P[SL���
0�L���$\Z[YHSPHU�7YHUZWVY[�&V\UJPS��������1DWLRQDO�5DLOZD\�/HYHO�&URVVLQJ�6DIHW\� 6WUDWHJ\��^^^�H[JV\UJPS�NV]�H\�YHPS�BH[J�UHD�
>OLYL�H�9HPS^H`�.YV\W�:[HUKHYK�PZ�YLMLYLUJLK��[OL�KVJ\TLU[�JVKL�PZ�[OL�Z[HUKHYKZ�
M\SS�YLMLYLUJL�U\TILY��P�L���B.*�9;����D�
-VY�HSS�>VYSK�>PKL�>LI�ZV\YJLZ�^P[OV\[�H�ZWLJPÄJ�H\[OVY��MVY�L_HTWSL�HU�PUMVYTH[PVU�
ZOLL[��[OL�KVJ\TLU[�JVKL�\ZLZ�[OL�ÄYZ[�[^V�SL[[LYZ�VM�[OL�^LI�WHNL�[P[SL�HUK�PZ�
WYVJLLKLK�^P[O�^^^��0�L���ZZZ�IL[[LYYVHKZ�JVT�HY[PJSLZ�IYKLJ��H�O[T��$W�NYHKL� PUJPKLU[Z�HUK�MH[HSP[PLZ�JVU[PU\L�[V�KLJSPUL�B^^^�H[D�
BHH�YLD��((�-V\UKH[PVU�MVY�9VHK�:HML[`�9LZLHYJO� �)PYTPUNOHT�*P[`�*V\UJPS��� ���
5HG�OLJKW�UXQQLQJ��DFFLGHQWV�DQG�VXUYHLOODQFH�FDPHUDV���9LWVY[�UV��((�)**���
BHI�KY�D��(IYHOHT��1���+H[[H��;�2���+H[[H��:���� ���'ULYHU�EHKDYLRXU�DW�UDLO�KLJKZD\� JUDGH�FURVVLQJV���7YVJLLKPUNZ�VM�[OL���[O�(UU\HS�4LL[PUN�VM�[OL�;YHUZWVY[H[PVU�
9LZLHYJO�)VHYK��>HZOPUN[VU��+�*���WW����
BHI�KY�D��(ILYN��3���� ���'ULYHU�EHKDYLRXU�DW�ÁDVKLQJ�OLJKW��UDLO�KLJKZD\� FURVVLQJV��(JJPKLU[�(UHS`ZPZ� �7YL]LU[PVU��]VS�����PZZ\L����WW�� ����
BHK�YPD��(KHTZ��1���� ���5LVN��9V\[SLKNL��;H`SVY� �-YHUJPZ�!�3VUKVU
BHY�\ZD��(Y[O\Y�+�3P[[SL��������8VHU�ZRUNHG�DQG�IRRWSDWK�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ��5LVN�UHYLHZ�� 9;���� �����YLW�KVJ��^^^�YZZI�JV�\R�
BH[J�UHD��(\Z[YHSPHU�;YHUZWVY[�*V\UJPS��������1DWLRQDO�5DLOZD\�/HYHO�&URVVLQJ�6DIHW\� 6WUDWHJ\��^^^�H[JV\UJPS�NV]�H\�YHPS�
BIP�O\D��)PII �̀�1�� �9LNHU��1���� ���+XPDQ�IDFWRUV�UHVHDUFK�LQWR�XVH�RI�XVHU�ZRUNHG�
81
OHYHO�FURVVLQJV���D�UHSRUW�SURGXFHG�IRU�WKH�+HDOWK�DQG�6DIHW\�([HFXWLYH��(,(� ;LJOUVSVN �̀�^^^�OZL�NV]�\R�
BIY�Y\D��)YV^U��4���������(UURUV��HUURUV�HYHU\ZKHUH��QRU�DQ\�WKLQJ�LV�ULJKW�� 7YLZLU[LK�H[�9\SLZ��7YVJLK\YLZ�HUK�=PVSH[PVUZ�*VUMLYLUJL��3VUKVU
BI\�YPD��)\YNLZZ��*���������5LVN�EHKDYLRXU��^^^�L_�HJ�\R
BJV�N\D��*VKL�VM�WYHJ[PJL�MVY�[OL�JV�VYKPUH[PVU�VM�Z[YLL[�^VYRZ�L[J���*XLGHOLQHV�IRU� :RUNV�DW�RU�QHDU�5DLOWUDFN�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV���$SSHQGL[�)��:[YLL[�^VYRZ�H[�VY�ULHY� SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ
BJ\�YHD��*\USPMML��1�7��� ���5DLO�+LJKZD\�JUDGH�FURVVLQJV��$Q�RYHUYLHZ�RI�GHVLJQ�� RSHUDWLRQ�DQG�DFFLGHQW�LQYHVWLJDWLRQ��7YVMLZZPVUHS�:HML[ �̀�]VS�����PZZ\L����WW�������
BKM[�JVD��+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[��������&RQJHVWLRQ�DQG�DFFLGHQW�ULVN��9VHK�ZHML[`� 9LZLHYJO�9LWVY[�UV�����
BKM[�PU�D��+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[��KH[L�\URUV^U���,QÁXHQFLQJ�GULYHU�DWWLWXGHV�DQG� EHKDYLRXU��QR������^^^�KM[�NV]�\R
BKM[�PU�D��+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[��������,QWHUQDWLRQDO�UHYLHZ�RI�WKH�LQGLYLGXDO� IDFWRUV�FRQWULEXWLQJ�WR�GULYLQJ�EHKDYLRXU��^^^�KM[�NV]�\R�
BKM[�VSD��+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[��KH[L�\URUV^U���2OGHU�GULYHUV��D�OLWHUDWXUH�UHYLHZ� �QR������^^^�KM[�NV]�\R
BKM[�[OD��+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[��������7KH�DJHLQJ�GULYHU��D�SURJUDPPH�RI� UHVHDUFK��9VHK�ZHML[`�9LZLHYJO�9LWVY[�UV��� �
BKM[�[YD��+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[��������7UDLQLQJ�FKLOGUHQ�LQ�VDIH�XVH�RI�GHVLJQDWHG� FURVVLQJV��9VHK�ZHML[`�9LZLHYJO�9LWVY[�UV�����
BKY�`VD��+YV\PU��.���������<RXWK�SHUFHSWLRQ�RI�ULVN��:K\�GR�\RXWK�ULVN�WKHLU�OLYHV� DQG�KRZ�WR�FKDQJH�\RXWK�EHKDYLRXU�LQ�UDLO�VDIHW\"��;YHUZWVY[�*HUHKH���7HWLY� WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�
:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BLS�HKD��,SSPV[[��4�(�� �)H\NOHU��*�1���������$GROHVFHQW�URDG�XVHU�EHKDYLRXU��$� VXUYH\�RI�������\HDU�ROGV��;93�YLWVY[�UV������MVY�+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[
BM\�[OD��-\SSLY��9���� ���7KH�SV\FKRORJ\�RI�URDG�XVHU�EHKDYLRXU��+LWHY[TLU[�VM�
7Z`JOVSVN �̀�;YPUP[`�*VSSLNL��+\ISPU
.*�9;������� ���&LYLO�(QJLQHHULQJ�5HTXLUHPHQWV�IRU�/HYHO�&URVVLQJV��PZZ\L��
.,�9;������;>���������/HYHO�FURVVLQJV��PZZ\L��
82
.0�9;������������3URYLVLRQ��5LVN�$VVHVVPHQW�DQG�5HYLHZ�RI�/HYHO�&URVVLQJV�� PZZ\L��
.0�9;������������5HTXLUHPHQWV�IRU�/HYHO�&URVVLQJV��PZZ\L��
.0�95������������*XLGDQFH�RQ�3URYLVLRQ��5LVN�$VVHVVPHQW�DQG�5HYLHZ�RI�/HYHO� &URVVLQJV��PZZ\L��
.2�9;������� ���/HYHO�&URVVLQJ�$XGLEOH�:DUQLQJV��PZZ\L��
BNY�YPD��.YH`ZVU��.�)���4H`JVJR��.���.YVLNLY��1�(���/HTTVUK�:�4�� �-PLSK��+�;���������
5LVN��KD]DUG�SHUFHSWLRQ�DQG�SHUFHLYHG�FRQWURO��;93�YLWVY[�UV������MVY�+LWHY[TLU[�
MVY�;YHUZWVY[
BNY�L`D��.YLNVY �̀�9�3���������(\H�DQG�EUDLQ��WKH�SV\FKRORJ\�RI�VHHLQJ��ÀIWK�HGLWLRQ��� 6_MVYK�<UP]LYZP[`�7YLZZ!�6_MVYK
BNY�PTD��.YPMÄVLU��,���,PSURYLQJ�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV�XVLQJ�ÀQGLQJV�IURP�KXPDQ� EHKDYLRXU�VWXGLHV��5L[OLYSHUKZ�9HPS���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS� *YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BOH�WYD��/HNH��:���� ���3UHYHQWLRQ�RI�DFFLGHQWV�DW�URDG�UDLO�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV� SURWHFWHG�ZLWK�DXWRPDWLF�EDUULHUV��9PKPUN�[OL�>H]L�VM�0UUV]H[PVU���7YVJLLKPUNZ�VM�
[OL�/\THU�-HJ[VYZ�:VJPL[`���UK�(UU\HS�4LL[PUN��(UHOLPT��*HSPMVYUPH�� ���WW� ���
���
BOH�HUD��/HNH��:���>H[HUHIL��2�� �2\Z\RHTP��2���� � ��$�QHZ�ZDUQLQJ�V\VWHP�IRU� SURWHFWHG�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��7LYZWLJ[P]LZ���7YVJLLKPUNZ�VM�[OL�/\THU�-HJ[VYZ�:VJPL[`�
��YK�(UU\HS�4LL[PUN��+LU]LY��*VSVYHKV��6J[VILY�� � ��WW� ��� ���
BOH�TVD��/HPSL��1���������0RGHOOLQJ�XVHU�HUURU�DW�SDVVLYH�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��/HSJYV^� *VUZ\S[PUN����7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�
4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�����(WYPS������(WYPS������
BOH�TVD��/HSS��:���������0RGHUQ�VLJQDOOLQJ�KDQGERRN��WKLUG�HGLWLRQ���0HU�(SSHU� 7\ISPZOPUN!�:\YYL`
BOH�YHD��/HSS��:���� ���5DLOZD\�GLVDVWHUV��FDXVH�DQG�HIIHFW��;OL�7YVTV[PVUHS�9LWYPU[�
*VTWHU`!�3LPJLZ[LY
BOH�O\D��/HYYPZ�[LJOUPJHS�ZLY]PJLZ��+XPDQ�IDFWRUV��^^^�OHYYPZ[LJOUPJHS�JVT�
O\THU�O[T
BOZL�SLD��/LHS[O� �:HML[`�,_LJ\[P]L��������/HYHO�&URVVLQJV��^^^�OZL�NV]�\R�YHPS^H`Z�
BOZL�YHD��/LHS[O� �:HML[`�,_LJ\[P]L��� ���5DLOZD\�6DIHW\�3ULQFLSOHV�DQG�*XLGDQFH�� SDUW����VHFWLRQ�(��JXLGDQFH�RQ�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��/4:6�)VVRZ!�3VUKVU�
83
BOZL�YLD��/LHS[O� �:HML[`�,_LJ\[P]L��������5HGXFLQJ�HUURU�DQG�LQÁXHQFLQJ� EHKDYLRXU��/:.����/4:6�)VVRZ!�5VY^PJO
BOZL�[OD��/LHS[O� �:HML[`�,_LJ\[P]L��� ���7KH�&DU�/DQH�$FFLGHQW��/4:6�)VVRZ!�
3VUKVU
BOZL�[YD��/LHS[O� �:HML[`�,_LJ\[P]L��������7UDLQ�GHUDLOPHQW�DW�8IWRQ�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ�� QHDU�8IWRQ�1HUYHW��%HUNVKLUH��+6(�LQWHULP�UHSRUW��/:,�^LIZP[L
BOL�THD��/LH[VU��1���� ���0DNLQJ�RFFXSDWLRQ�FURVVLQJV�VDIHU��4VKLYU�9HPS^H`Z��
� ���PZZ\L� ��WW�������
BOL�SLD��/LSSTHU��(�+�� �*HYYVSS��(�(��/HVVRQV�OHDUQHG�IURP�WKH�HYDOXDWLRQ�RI�D� IXU�TXDGUDQW�JDWH�JUDGH�FURVVLQJ�ZLWK�REVWUXFWLRQ�GHWHFWLRQ��=VSWL�5H[PVUHS� ;YHUZWVY[H[PVU�:`Z[LTZ���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�
:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BO\�PUD��/\THU�,UNPULLYPUN��������,QYHVWLJDWLRQ�LQWR�XVHU�DFFHSWDQFH�RI�D�QRYHO� ZDUQLQJ�GHYLFH���9LWVY[�WYLWHYLK�MVY�9HPS�:HML[`�HUK�:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK��;�� �<ZLY� ILOH]PV\Y�H[�\ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUNZZ
BO\�O\D��/\THU�,UNPULLYPUN��������+XPDQ�IDFWRUV�DVVHVVPHQW�RI�WKH�ULVNV� DVVRFLDWHG�ZLWK�0:/�&URVVLQJV���9LWVY[�WYLWHYLK�MVY�9HPS�:HML[`�HUK�:[HUKHYKZ� )VHYK��;�� �<ZLY�ILOH]PV\Y�H[�\ZLY�^VYRLK�JYVZZPUNZ
BPU�[LD��7HFKQLFDO�WRXU��'HOHJDWH�SDFN���[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUN�:`TWVZP\T�
HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BSL�KYD��3LYULY��5�+�� �9H[[L��+�1��� ���'ULYHUV�DV�GHFLVLRQ�PDNHUV�DW�UDLO�KLJKZD\� JUDGH�FURVVLQJV��*V\U[KV^U�[V�[OL���Z[�*LU[\Y �̀��7YVJLLKPUNZ�VM�[OL�/\THU�-HJ[VYZ�
:VJPL[`���[O�(UU\HS�4LL[PUN��VYSHUKV��-SVYPKH��6J[VILY�� ���WW�����������
BTH�YVD�4H`JVJR��.���)YVJRSLIHUR��7�1�� �/HSS��9�+���� ���5RDG�OD\RXW�GHVLJQ� VWDQGDUGV�DQG�GULYHU�EHKDYLRXU��;93�YLWVY[�UV������MVY�/PNO^H`Z�(NLUJ`
BTJ�PUD��4J7OLYZVU��*�+���+HMM��4���,QQRYDWLRQV�LQ�GLVDELOLW\�DFFHVV�DW�SHGHVWULDQ� UDLO�FURVVLQJV��:PUJSHPY�2UPNO[�4LYa��(\Z[YHSPH���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�
0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������
:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BTL�HUD��4LLRLY��-�3�� �)HYY��9�(��� � ��$Q�REVHUYDWLRQDO�VWXG\�RI�GULYHU�EHKDYLRXU� DW�D�SURWHFWHG�JUDGH�FURVVLQJ�DV�WUDLQV�DSSURDFK��(JJPKLU[�(UHS`ZPZ� �7YL]LU[PVU�� ]VS�����PZZ\L����WW���������
BTL�HJD��4LLRLY��-���-V_��+�� �>LILY��*���� ���$�FRPSDULVRQ�RI�GULYHU�EHKDYLRXU�DW� UDLOURDG�JUDGH�FURVVLQJV�ZLWK�WZR�GLIIHUHQW�SURWHFWLRQ�V\VWHPV��(JJPKLU[�(UHS`ZPZ� �7YL]LU[PVU��]VS�� ��PZZ\L����WW�������
84
BTL�VWD��4LSI �̀�.���5VVRHSH��4�� �;HH]VSH��+���������2SHUDWLRQDO�WHVW�RI�ORZ�FRVW� DFWLYH�ZDUQLQJ�V\VWHP�IRU�ORZ�YROXPH�KLJKZD\�UDLO�LQWHUVHFWLRQV�LQ�0LQQHVRWD��� 7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�
;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BTV�H\D��4VY[PTLY��9�.���� ���$XWRPRWLYH�HQJLQHHULQJ�DQG�OLWLJDWLRQ��=VS\TL����
LKP[LK�I`�.�(�7L[LYZ�HUK�)�1��7L[LYZ��.HYSHUK�3H^�7\ISPZOPUN��5L^�@VYR��WW����� �
BTV�]PD��4VY[PTLY��9�.���� ���9LVXDO�IDFWRUV�LQ�UDLO�KLJKZD\�JUDGH�FURVVLQJ� DFFLGHQWV��=PZPVUZ��7YVJLLKPUNZ�VM�[OL�/\THU�-HJ[VYZ�:VJPL[`���[O�(UU\HS�4LL[PUN��
]VS����WW���������
BU[ZI�ZHD��5H[PVUHS�;YHUZWVY[H[PVU�:HML[`�)VHYK��� ���6DIHW\�DW�3DVVLYH�*UDGH� &URVVLQJV��9ROXPH����$QDO\VLV��>HZOPUN[VU��+�*����� ���^^^�U[ZI�NV]�W\ISPJ[U�
YFZ[\�O[T
BUL�[OD��5LSZVU��(���������7KH�8.�DSSURDFK�WR�PDQJDJLQJ�ULVN�DW�SDVVLYH�OHYHO� FURVVLQJV��9HPS�:HML[`� �:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK��3VUKVU��<2���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O� 0U[LYUH[PVUHS�:`TWVZP\T�VU�9HPSYVHK�/PNO^H`�.YHKL�*YVZZPUN�9LZLHYJO�HUK�:HML[ �̀�
-LIY\HY`�������^^^�Y[H�H\�JVUMLYLUJLZ�JYVZZPUNZ�HIZ[YHJ[Z�WYVNYHT�O[T�
BUL�SLD��5LSZVU��(���;PSS �̀�1�� �+H]PLZ��(���������/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�VDIHW\�DFURVV�WKH� (XURSHDQ�8QLRQ��9HPS�:HML[`� �:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O� 0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������
:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BUL�YPD�5L^ZVTL��3��9���� ����5LVN�WDNLQJ�DV�D�GHFLVLRQ�SURFHVV�LQ�GULYLQJ��;93� YLWVY[�UV��:9����MVY�+LWHY[TLU[�VM�[OL�,U]PYVUTLU[�;YHUZWVY[�9LNPVUZ��UV^�RUV^U�HZ�
+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[�
BUV�WYD��5VY[O�*HYVSPUH�+LWHY[TLU[�VM�;YHUZWVY[H[PVU�9HPS�+P]PZPVU��� ��3ULRU�GULYHU� SHUIRUPDQFH�DQG�H[SUHVVHG�DWWLWXGHV�WRZDUGV�ULVN�IDFWRUV�DV�IDFWRUV�DVVRFLDWHG� ZLWK�UDLOURDG�JUDGH�FURVVLQJ�YLRODWLRQV��^^^�OZYJ�\UJ�LK\�YLZLHYJO�O\THUF
KYP]LY�O[T�
BVO�HUD��6O[H��4���:OPIH`HTH��5�� �/HUH^H��2���������$Q�REVWDFOH�GHWHFWLRQ�V\VWHP� IRU�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV�XVLQJ�VWHUHR�FDPHUDV��9HPS^H`�;LJOUPJHS�9LZLHYJO�0UZ[P[\[L� YLWVY[��1HWHU��7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�
HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BWH�SVD��7HQ\ULU��2���������/RZ�FRVW�PHDVXUHV�DW�)LQQLVK�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��=;;� )\PSKPUN�HUK�;YHUZWVY[��-PUSHUK���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�
*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
BWL�^OD��7LHZL��(�� �7LHZL��)���������:K\�PHQ�GRQ·W�OLVWHQ�DQG�ZRPHQ�FDQ·W�UHDG� PDSV��6YPVU�)VVRZ!�3VUKVU
85
BWP�]LD��7PJRL[[��4�>�� �.YH`ZVU��.�)���� ���9HKLFOH�'ULYHU�%HKDYLRXU�DW�/HYHO� &URVVLQJV��;93�9LWVY[�MVY�/:,��5V�� ��
BYZZI�W\D��9HPS�:HML[`� �:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK��������3XEOLF�%HKDYLRXU��*HWWLQJ�WKH�%HVW� 8VH�RXW�RI�&&79�LQ�WKH�5DLOZD\V��1HZ�DQG�(PHUJLQJ�7HFKQRORJLHV�����;6��� �9ZLY]���@���^^^�YZZI�JV�\R�
BYZZI�YHD��9HPS�:HML[`� �:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK��������5DLOZD\�6DIHW\�5HVHDUFK�3URJUDPPH� ��7KHPH�VWUDWHJ\����/HYHO�&URVVLQJV��^^^�YZZI�JV�\R�
BYZZI�YVD��9HPS�:HML[`� �:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK��������5RDG�YHKLFOH�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV�VSHFLDO� WRSLF�UHSRUW���^^^�YZZI�JV�\R�
BYH�HYD��9HPS[YHJR��������$�UHYLHZ�RI�ULVNV�DW�D�VHOHFWLRQ�RI�DXWRPDWLF�RSHQ�OHYHO� FURVVLQJV��$2&/����6LWHV�DQG�LGHQWLÀFDWLRQ�RI�VDIHW\�LPSURYHPHQWV�IRU�YDULRXV� VLWH�FRQGLWLRQV���:HML[`�9LWVY[��;93�
BYH�KYD��9HZSLHY��;�.���� ���'ULYHU�EHKDYLRXU�DW�UDLO�KLJKZD\�JUDGH�FURVVLQJV��D� VLJQDO�GHWHFWLRQ�WKHRU\�DQDO\VLV��-LKLYHS�9HPSYVHK�(KTPUPZ[YH[PVU��>HZOPUN[VU��<:(��
^^�MYH�KV[�NV]�
BYL�ILD��9LHZVU��1�� �-YLL��9���� ���%HQGLQJ�WKH�UXOHV��7KH�SV\FKRORJ\�RI� YLRODWLRQV��9::)!�/\THU�MHJ[VYZ�*+�964�������
BYL�O\D��9LHZVU��1���� ���+XPDQ�HUURU��*HTIYPKNL�<UP]LYZP[`�7YLZZ!�*HTIYPKNL
BYP�TVD��9PJOHYKZ��:�/�� �/LH[OPUN[VU��2�>���� ���0RWRULVW�XQGHUVWDQGLQJ�RI� UDLOURDG�KLJKZD\�JUDGH�FURVVLQJ�WUDIÀF�FRQWURO�GHYLFHV�DQG�DVVRFLDWHG�WUDIÀF� ODZV��;YHMÄJ�*VU[YVS�+L]PJLZ�� ���;YHUZWVY[H[PVU�)VHYK��;YHUZWVY[H[PVU�9LZLHYJO�
YLJVYK������
9;�3:�:������������,QVSHFWLRQ�DQG�ULVN�DVVHVVPHQW�IRUPV�IRU�XVHU�ZRUNHG�� IRRWSDWK�DQG�EULGOHZD\�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��PZZ\L����5L[^VYR�9HPS�
9;�3:�7������������,QVSHFWLRQ�DQG�ULVN�DVVHVVPHQW�PHWKRGRORJ\�IRU�XVHU� ZRUNHG��IRRWSDWK�DQG�EULGOHZD\�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��PZZ\L����5L[^VYR�9HPS�
9;�,�:����� ��������/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�JURXQG�SODQV��5DLOWUDFN�/LQH�VSHFLÀFDWLRQ��� 5L[^VYR�9HPS�
9;�,�:�� �����������/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�LQIUDVWUXFWXUH��LQVSHFWLRQ��PDLQWHQDQFH�� KDQGERRN��5L[^VYR�9HPS�
9;�*,�:������� ���/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�VXUIDFH�V\VWHPV��5DLOWUDFN�OLQH�VSHFLÀFDWLRQ��� 5L[^VYR�9HPS�
9;�+�7������������0DQDJHPHQW�RI�ULVN�DW�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��5L[^VYR�9HPS�
86
9;�,�:����� ��������2SHUDWLRQDO�UHTXLUHPHQWV�IRU�PLQLDWXUH�VWRS�OLJKW�OHYHO� FURVVLQJV��5L[^VYR�9HPS�
BY`�L]D��9`Z��4�1��9\ZZLSS��,�9�� �3LLKOHT��)���� ���(YDOXDWLRQ�RI�D�WUDLQ�LOOXPLQDWHG� SDVVLYH�ZDUQLQJ�VLJQ��(K]HUJLZ�PU�0UK\Z[YPHS�,YNVUVTPJZ�HUK�:HML[`�=00��LKP[LK�I`�
(�*��)P[[ULY�HUK�7�*�*OHTWUL �̀�;H`SVY� �-YHUJPZ��3VUKVU��WW� � � ���
BZO�[OD��:OHURZ��4�� �-YHZLY��*���������7KH�LQWURGXFWLRQ�RI�5HG�/LJKW�(QIRUFHPHQW� &DPHUDV�DW�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV�LQ�WKH�8.��5L[^VYR�9HPS��<2���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL� �[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������
:OLMÄLSK��<2�����(WYPS������(WYPS������
BZ[�H\D��:[V[[��7�-���� ����$XWRPDWLF�RSHQ�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��$�UHYLHZ�RI�VDIHW\�� +LWHY[TLU[�VM�;YHUZWVY[��UV^�+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[���/4:6��3VUKVU
BZW�MHD��:WPJLY��;���)DWDO�DFFLGHQWV��GLVDELOLW\�DFFHVV�DW�UDLOZD\�SHGHVWULDQ� FURVVLQJV�LQ�9LFWRULD��$XVWUDOLD��+LWHY[TLU[�VM�0UMYHZ[Y\J[\YL��(\Z[YHSPH���7HWLY�
WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�
:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
B[H�HJD��;H`SVY��4�*���/HSS��9�+�� �*OH[[LYQLL��2���� ���$FFLGHQWV�DW���DUP�WUDIÀF� VLJQDOV�RQ�XUEDQ�VLQJOH�FDUULDJHZD\�URDGV��;93�YLWVY[�UV������MVY�+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�
;YHUZWVY[
B[L�JHD��;LURPUR��,�� �=HU�+LY�/VYZ[��9���� ���&DU�GULYHU�EHKDYLRXU�DW�ÁDVKLQJ�OLJKW� UDLOURDG�JUDGH�FURVVLQJV��(JJPKLU[�(UHS`ZPZ� �7YL]LU[PVU��]VS\TL����PZZ\L����WW��� �
�� �
B/4:6�[OD���7KH�7UDIÀF�6LJQV�UHJXODWLRQV�DQG�*HQHUDO�'LUHFWLRQV��������UV�������� /4:6!�3VUKVU
B[P�HUD��;PSS �̀�1���������$Q�LQWURGXFWLRQ�WR�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ�SUDFWLFH�LQ�WKH�8QLWHG� .LQJGRP��7\SHV�RI�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ�LQ�XVH�LQ�WKH�8QLWHG�.LQJGRP�DQG�SULQFLSDO� OHJLVODWLRQ�LQYROYHG��/LY�4HQLZ[`»Z�9HPS^H`�0UZWLJ[VYH[L��3VUKVU��<2���7HWLY�
WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�
:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
B[V�PUD��;VWOHT��.���������,QWURGXFWLRQ�DQG�DSSURYDO�RI�5HG�/LJKW�(QIRUFHPHQW� (TXLSPHQW�RQ�WKH�8.�5DLOZD\��3SV`K»Z�9LNPZ[LY�9HPS���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O� 0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������
:OLMÄLSK��<2�
B[Y�HOD��;YHUZWVY[�*HUHKH��������$�KXPDQ�IDFWRUV�DQDO\VLV�RI�KLJKZD\�UDLOZD\�JUDGH� FURVVLQJ�DFFLGHQWV�LQ�&DQDGD��;7��� ��,��^^^�[J�NJ�JH�JK[�ZVTTHPYL��� ���
TLU\�O[T�
87
B[Y�SLD��;YHUZWVY[�*HUHKH��������/('�WHFKQRORJ\�IRU�LPSURYHG�FRQVSLFXLW\�RI�VLJQDO� OLJKWV�DW�KLJKZD\�UDLOZD\�JUDGH�FURVVLQJV��;7������,��^^^�[J�NJ�JH�[KJ�WYVQLJ[Z� YHPS�I� ���O[T�
B[YS�SLD��;93��������$�UHYLHZ�RI�ULVNV�DW�D�VOHFWLRQ�RI�DXWRPDWLF�RSHQ�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ� VLWHV�DQG�LGHQWLÀFDWLRQ�RI�VDIHW\�LPSURYHPHQWV�IRU�YDULRXV�VLWH�FRQGLWLRQV��6DIHW\� UHSRUW��WYLWHYLK�MVY�9HPS[YHJR��PU[LYUHS�KVJ\TLU[�VUS`�
BKV[�L]D��<�:��+LWHY[TLU[�VM�;YHUZWVY[H[PVU��+6;���� ���(YDOXDWLRQ�RI� 5HWURUHÁHFWLYH�0DUNLQJV�WR�,QFUHDVH�5DLO�&DU�&RQVSLFXLW\��6DIHW\�RI�+LJKZD\� 5DLOURDG�*UDGH�&URVVLQJV��+6;�=5;:*�99� ��74� ������^^^�MYH�KV[�NV]�
B]H�ZHD��=HU�KLY�/VYZ[��9�� �)HRRLY��7���������6DIHW\�PHDVXUHV�DW�UDLOZD\�OHYHO� FURVVLQJV�DQG�URDG�XVHU�EHKDYLRXU��;56�/\THU�MHJ[VYZ���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL�
�[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������
:OLMÄLSK��<2�
B]P�OND��=PQLUKYHU��4���)LHYK��4�� �:[L]LUZ��.���������+*9�DFFLGHQWV�DW�OHYHO� FURVVLQJV��(Y[O\Y�+�3P[[SL���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ� :`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
B]P�YLD��=PQLUKYHU��4���)LHYK��4�� �:[L]LUZ��.���������5HG�OLJKW�YLRODWLRQV�DW�OHYHO� FURVVLQJV��(Y[O\Y�+�3P[[SL���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ� :`TWVZP\T�HUK�4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
B]P�ILD��=PUL��2�� �2PUN��*���� ���%HUNV�DQG�+DQWV�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ�PRGHUQLVDWLRQ� IHDVLELOLW\�VWXG\���4/(�(ZZVJPH[LZ�MVY�9HPS[YHJR�.YLH[�>LZ[LYU��
B^H�HJD��>HYK��5�1�� �>PSKL��.�1�:���� ���$�FRPSDULVLRQ�RI�YHKLFXODU�DSSURDFK� VSHHG�DQG�EUDNLQJ�EHWZHHQ�GD\�DQG�QLJKWWLPH�SHULRGV�DW�DQ�DXWRPDWHG�UDLOZD\� FURVVLQJ��:HML[`�:JPLUJL��]VS�� ��PZZ\L����WW�������
B^H�KYD��>HYK��5�1�� �>PSKL��.�1�:���� ���'ULYHU�DSSURDFK�EHKDYLRXU�DW�DQ� XQSURWHFWHG�UDLOZD\�FURVVLQJ�EHIRUH�DQG�DIWHU�HQKDQFHPHQW�RI�ODWHUDO�VLJKW� GLVWDQFHV��$Q�H[SHULPHQWDO�LQYHVWLJDWLRQ�RI�D�ULVN�SHUFHSWLRQ�DQG�EHKDYLRXUDO� FRPSHQVDWLRQ�K\SRWKHVLV��:HML[`�:JPLUJL��]VS�����PZZ\L������WW�������
B^H�ÄD��>HYK��5�1�� �>PSKL��.�1�:���� ���)LHOG�REVHUYDWLRQ�RI�DGYDQFH�ZDUQLQJ� DGYLVRU\�VLJQDJH�IRU�SDVVLYH�UDLOZD\�FURVVLQJV�ZLWK�UHVWULFWHG�ODWHUDO�VLJKWOLQH� YLVLELOLW\��$Q�H[SHULPHQWDO�LQYHVWLJDWLRQ��(JJPKLU[�(UHS`ZPZ� �7YL]LU[PVU��]VS����� PZZ\L����WW������ �
B^L�YPD�>L`THU��(�2�� �2LSS �̀�*�1���� ��5LVN�SHUFHSWLRQ�DQG�ULVN�FRPPXQLFDWLRQ��$� UHYLHZ�RI�OLWHUDWXUH��/LHS[O�HUK�:HML[`�3HIVYH[VY`
B^P�LYD��>PNNSLZ^VY[O��,�*���� ���(UJRQRPLFV�DQG�$FFLGHQWV��7KH�HIIHFWLYHQHVV�RI� ERRP�EDUULHUV�LQ�UHGXFLQJ�DFFLGHQWV�DW�UDLOZD\�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��,YNVUVTPJ�+LZPNU�
88
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
VM�7YVK\J[Z�MVY�[OL�*VUZ\TLY���7YVJLLKPUNZ�VM�[OL���[O�(UU\HS�*VUMLYLUJL�VM�[OL�
,YNVUVTPJZ�:VJPL[`�VM�(\Z[YHSPH��(KLSHPKL��(\Z[YHSPH��WW�������
B^P�WHD��>PNNSLZ^VY[O��,�*����KH[L�\URUV^U���3DVVLYH�UDLOURDG�KLJKZD\�JUDGH� FURVVLQJV��:KDW�DUH�WKH�UHVHDUFK�SULRULWLHV"��^^^�Y[H�JVT�H\�JVUMLYLUJLZ�
JYVZZPUNZ��HIZ[YHJ[Z�WYVNYHT�O[T�
B^P�HU�D��>PNNSLZ^VY[O��,�*�� �<ILY��*�)���� ���$Q�HYDOXDWLRQ�RI�WKH�UDLOZD\�OHYHO� FURVVLQJ�ERRP�EDUULHU�SURJUDP�LQ�9LFWRULD��$XVWUDOLD��1V\YUHS�VM�:HML[`�9LZLHYJO�� ]VS�����PZZ\L����WW��������
B^P�HU�D��>PSKL��.�1�:���/H �̀�4�*�� �)YP[LZ��1�5���� � ��$Q�DQDO\VLV�RI�YLGHR�UHFRUGHG� GULYHU�EHKDYLRXU�DW�OHYHO�UDLOZD\�FURVVLQJV���7YVJLLKPUNZ�VM�[OL�/\THU�-HJ[VYZ�
(ZZVJPH[PVU�VM�*HUHKH���UK�(UU\HS�*VUMLYLUJL��;VYVU[V��6U[HYPV��� � ��WW��������
B^P�]LD�>PUUL[[��4�(�� �>OLLSLY��(�/���������9HKLFOH�DFWLYDWHG�VLJQV��D�ODUJH�VFDOH� HYDOXDWLRQ��;93�YLWVY[�UV������MVY�+LWHY[TLU[�MVY�;YHUZWVY[
B^P�HJD��>P[[PUR��9�+���� ����$FFLGHQWV�DW�OHYHO�FURVVLQJV��&RQWUDU\�WR�SRSXODU� EHOLHI��FDUHOHVV�EHKDYLRXU�LV�QRW�WKH�RQO\�FDXVH��7HWLY�MVY�[OL�7HZZLUNLY�;YHUZWVY[� 9LZLHYJO�*V\UJPS
B^V�KLD��>VVKZ��4���������'HYHORSPHQW�RI�D�SURJUDPPH�RI�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ�UHVHDUFK� WR�LPSURYH�UDLOZD\�VDIHW\�LQ�*UHDW�%ULWDLQ��9HPS�:HML[`� �:[HUKHYKZ�)VHYK��9::)��� 3VUKVU��<2���7HWLY�WYLZLU[LK�H[�[OL��[O�0U[LYUH[PVUHS�3L]LS�*YVZZPUNZ�:`TWVZP\T�HUK�
4HUHNPUN�;YLZWHZZ�:LTPUHY�������:OLMÄLSK��<2�
89
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
$SSHQGLFHV
$ ��������������/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�YLVLWV
;OPZ�HWWLUKP_�PZ�Z\WWSLTLU[HY`�[V�ZLJ[PVU������3L]LS�JYVZZPUN�]PZP[Z�H[�[OL�ILNPUUPUN�VM�
[OPZ�YLWVY[���0[�WYV]PKLZ�WOV[VNYHWOZ�VM����VM�[OL����SL]LS�JYVZZPUNZ�]PZP[LK��
% ��������������+)�LVVXHV�E\�OHYHO�FURVVLQJ�W\SH
;OPZ�HWWLUKP_�JVU[HPUZ�H�SPZ[�VM�[OL�/-�PZZ\LZ�YLSL]HU[�[V�LHJO�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WL��
90
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
$SSHQGL[�$��/HYHO�FURVVLQJ�YLVLWV
%HGIRUG� .HPSVWRQ�+DUGZLFN��$%&/�����������������������������������
0LOOEURRN�6WDWLRQ��0&*
6WHZDUWE\�%ULFNZRUNV��0&*��3ULYDWH�&URVVLQJ�.HHSHU
6WHZDUWE\�*UHHQ�/DQH�6WDWLRQ��0&*
91
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
:RRWWRQ�%URDGPHDG��$+%
'RQFDVWHU�
&UH\NHV��$+%
'RFNKLOOV��0&%�&&79
(JJERURXJK��)3
92
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
)LHOGV�/DQH��$2&/
+HQVDOO�6WDWLRQ��0&*
0DUVK�/DQH��)3
6QDLWK��3RQWHIUDFW��0&%�&&79
93
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
6WDLQIRUWK�5RDG��0&%�&&79
7KRUSH��$2&/
+HUWIRUG 5R\GRQ�6WDWLRQ��0&%�&&79
6W�0DUJDUHWV�6WDWLRQ��0&%�&&79
94
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
:DUH�6WDWLRQ��0&%�&&79
:DUH��D���)3
:DUH��E���)3
0LOWRQ�.H\QHV %HUU\�/DQH��8:&�7
95
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
%RZ�%ULFNKLOO�6WDWLRQ��$+%
/HLJKWRQ�%X]]DUG��1DWLRQDO�+HULWDJH�5DLOZD\��2SHQ�&URVVLQJ
:REXUQ�6DQGV��)3
:REXUQ�6DQGV�6WDWLRQ��0&%
96
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K�����
3HWHUERURXJK
%DLQWRQ�*UHHQ��$+%
)R[�&RYHUW��)3
/ROKDP�%ULGJHV��0&%�&&79
/ROKDP��)3
97
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
0D[H\��0&%�&&79
7DOOLQJWRQ��0&%�&&79
:RRGFURIW��0&*
98
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
+H]PZ�(ZZVJPH[LZ�3[K����� �
$SSHQGL[�%��+)�LVVXHV�E\�FURVVLQJ�W\SH
;OL�MVSSV^PUN�WHNLZ�JVU[HPU�H�SPZ[�VM�[OL�/\THU�-HJ[VYZ�PZZ\LZ�I`�SL]LS�JYVZZPUN�[`WL���
99
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
02
03
07
08
11
15
Level crossing type: AOCLDriver distractions
Distractions on the approach to a level crossing may impair the performance of both vehicle and train drivers.
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Road junctions close to the level crossing may result in increased decision making and errors by vehicle drivers,
and blocking-back over the crossing.
06
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Road junctions
Vehicle approach speed
The speed of the road traversing a level crossing is a factor in vehicle driver errors.
Age of drivers
Violations at level crossings may be influenced by the age of the local population.
10
HGV drivers form a disproportionately high number of incidents at level crossings.
Representation of HGV users
Pedestrian access
Pedestrian and passengers are more likely to undertake risky behaviour at vehicular level crossings where
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed
restrictions etc., all contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’ time.
12
bridges are not provided.
Regularity of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school
day.
14 Time of day
Visual clutter
Superfluous information and roadside structures on the approach to the crossing may reduce the user’s
detection of level crossing information and warning signs.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
The onset of the amber and proceeding red lights of the activated warning system lead to various vehicle driver
behaviours at level crossings.
17 Understanding of warning lights
Audible alarm
Closure time
The amount of time the user expects to wait at the level crossing may influence their risk taking behaviour.
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
16
18
20
28
29
31
32
38
40
Level crossing type: AOCL22
The effectiveness of flashing lights is limited by veiling glare, limited light output and their position.
Conspicuity of flashing lights
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Position of warning lights
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
Quantity of information
The quantity of signage information that can be read and understood decreases with road speed.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Location near rail stations
Level crossings adjacent to rail stations influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers and other users.
Train speeds
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
33
Parked cars before and after the level crossing may result in drivers slowing and stopping while on the level
crossing.
34
Sighting distance
Parked cars
Visitor parking
The position of visitors parked vehicles at a level crossing may affect the behaviour of other road drivers.
Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
42 Days of the week
43 Suicide
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Automatic open crossings
Automatic open level crossings result in increased risk taking behaviour, later in the crossing cycle.
Observation of amber light
The length of activation time of the amber light has little affect on the behaviour of the vehicle driver.
Road access
Level crossings that provide the only access to routes either side of the crossing influences the risk taking
behaviour of vehicle drivers.
Non-designated passenger drop-off points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of traffic
approaching a level crossing.
50 Passenger drop-off points
44
48
49
57
62
63
64
66
Level crossing type: AOCL
Level crossing located in a dip or on a brow of a long straight road may result in increases of red-light running.
51
The effectiveness of information is reduced by HGV drivers parking in front of signs and warning devices.
52
See-through effect
HGV drivers using rail station facilities
53 Events
Events increase the amount of irregular users at level crossings.
Narrow roads before and after the level crossing may result in vehicle drivers slowing and stopping while on the
level crossing.
54
The risk of vehicle drivers blocking-back over the level crossing, or general risk taking behaviour is increased
56
Narrow roads
when the crossing is located on roads with direct access to major roads or motorways.
Location near major roads
Traffic calming systems
Road traffic calming systems on the approaches to a level crossing may increase the risk of vehicles
blocking-back.
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing surface
Roadworks
Roadworks positioned up to 3 kilometres from the level crossing may still impact on vehicles blocking-back.
Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
Another train approaching
The ‘Another Train Coming if lights continue to show’ sign has minimal impact in providing vehicle drivers with
sufficient information.
The environmental context of a rural level crossing reduces the awareness of approaching vehicle drivers.
69 Rural level crossings
Road markings
The effectiveness of vehicle drivers stopping in the correct location is impaired by worn road markings.
Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
Commercial traffic
Location near farms
High volumes of farm traffic impact on the speed and behaviour of other vehicles traversing the crossing.
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
70
71
72
73
79
80
81
83
86
90
Level crossing type: AOCL
Level crossings located in close proximity to another may influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers.
74 Proximity of level crossing to another
Combined environmental features
Level crossings with a combination of environmental features, such as bends, hills, trees and hedges, may
increase the decision making errors of vehicle drivers.
Cats-eyes
Deteriorated ‘cats-eyes’ on the approach or on the level crossing may reduce the vehicle driver’s ability to
negotiate the road layout at night.
Sign pictogram
The ‘Puffer’ sign does not convey any directly useful information to users.
Road descents
Level crossings located at the end of a descent may result in increased red-light running by vehicle drivers.
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
School drop-off and collection points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of other vehicle
87
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88
The reliability and/or perception of reliability of the level crossing equipment affects the risk taking behaviour of
regular users.
89
drivers approaching the crossing.
School parking
Proximity of different road speeds
Level crossing equipment
Position of information
Perception of a hazard is improved when information referencing the imminent danger are associated together.
The position of incremental speed restriction signs influences the speed of vehicle drivers when approaching the
crossing.
91 Vehicle speed zones
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
wait at the level crossing.
96
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97
Straight roads increase the opportunities for vehicle drivers to undertake risky behaviour, to avoid having to
Straight roads
Stereotypical crossing users
Train arrival
Activation of the warning lights is used by passengers as a train arrival indicator.
102 Railway sidings
Alternative uses of railways sidings may alter the type of traffic using a level crossing.
Crossings located on routes used by emergency service vehicles may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
103 Emergency services
98
75
45
99
Level crossing type: AOCL104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Animals: Horses
Activated warnings at protected level crossings may result in undesirable behaviour by horses, and influence the
behaviour of other road vehicle users.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
Sightlines
Restricted or blocked sightlines may encourage users to move past a point of safety.
02
03
07
08
11
15
Level crossing type: AOCRDriver distractions
Distractions on the approach to a level crossing may impair the performance of both vehicle and train drivers.
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Road junctions close to the level crossing may result in increased decision making and errors by vehicle drivers,
and blocking-back over the crossing.
06
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Road junctions
Vehicle approach speed
The speed of the road traversing a level crossing is a factor in vehicle driver errors.
Age of drivers
Violations at level crossings may be influenced by the age of the local population.
10
HGV drivers form a disproportionately high number of incidents at level crossings.
Representation of HGV users
Pedestrian access
Pedestrian and passengers are more likely to undertake risky behaviour at vehicular level crossings where
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed
restrictions etc., all contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’ time.
12
bridges are not provided.
Regularity of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school
day.
14 Time of day
Visual clutter
Superfluous information and roadside structures on the approach to the crossing may reduce the user’s
detection of level crossing information and warning signs.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
The onset of the amber and proceeding red lights of the activated warning system lead to various vehicle driver
behaviours at level crossings.
17 Understanding of warning lights
Audible alarm
Closure time
The amount of time the user expects to wait at the level crossing may influence their risk taking behaviour.
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
16
18
20
28
29
31
32
38
40
Level crossing type: AOCR22
The effectiveness of flashing lights is limited by veiling glare, limited light output and their position.
Conspicuity of flashing lights
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Position of warning lights
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
Quantity of information
The quantity of signage information that can be read and understood decreases with road speed.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Location near rail stations
Level crossings adjacent to rail stations influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers and other users.
Train speeds
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
33
Parked cars before and after the level crossing may result in drivers slowing and stopping while on the level
crossing.
34
Sighting distance
Parked cars
Visitor parking
The position of visitors parked vehicles at a level crossing may affect the behaviour of other road drivers.
Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
42 Days of the week
43 Suicide
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Automatic open crossings
Automatic open level crossings result in increased risk taking behaviour, later in the crossing cycle.
Observation of amber light
The length of activation time of the amber light has little affect on the behaviour of the vehicle driver.
Road access
Level crossings that provide the only access to routes either side of the crossing influences the risk taking
behaviour of vehicle drivers.
Non-designated passenger drop-off points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of traffic
approaching a level crossing.
50 Passenger drop-off points
44
48
49
57
62
63
64
66
Level crossing type: AOCR
Level crossing located in a dip or on a brow of a long straight road may result in increases of red-light running.
51
The effectiveness of information is reduced by HGV drivers parking in front of signs and warning devices.
52
See-through effect
HGV drivers using rail station facilities
53 Events
Events increase the amount of irregular users at level crossings.
Narrow roads before and after the level crossing may result in vehicle drivers slowing and stopping while on the
level crossing.
54
The risk of vehicle drivers blocking-back over the level crossing, or general risk taking behaviour is increased
56
Narrow roads
when the crossing is located on roads with direct access to major roads or motorways.
Location near major roads
Traffic calming systems
Road traffic calming systems on the approaches to a level crossing may increase the risk of vehicles
blocking-back.
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing surface
Roadworks
Roadworks positioned up to 3 kilometres from the level crossing may still impact on vehicles blocking-back.
Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
Another train approaching
The ‘Another Train Coming if lights continue to show’ sign has minimal impact in providing vehicle drivers with
sufficient information.
The environmental context of a rural level crossing reduces the awareness of approaching vehicle drivers.
69 Rural level crossings
Road markings
The effectiveness of vehicle drivers stopping in the correct location is impaired by worn road markings.
Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
Commercial traffic
Location near farms
High volumes of farm traffic impact on the speed and behaviour of other vehicles traversing the crossing.
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
70
71
72
73
79
80
81
83
86
90
Level crossing type: AOCR
Level crossings located in close proximity to another may influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers.
74 Proximity of level crossing to another
Combined environmental features
Level crossings with a combination of environmental features, such as bends, hills, trees and hedges, may
increase the decision making errors of vehicle drivers.
Cats-eyes
Deteriorated ‘cats-eyes’ on the approach or on the level crossing may reduce the vehicle driver’s ability to
negotiate the road layout at night.
Sign pictogram
The ‘Puffer’ sign does not convey any directly useful information to users.
Road descents
Level crossings located at the end of a descent may result in increased red-light running by vehicle drivers.
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
School drop-off and collection points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of other vehicle
87
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88
The reliability and/or perception of reliability of the level crossing equipment affects the risk taking behaviour of
regular users.
89
drivers approaching the crossing.
School parking
Proximity of different road speeds
Level crossing equipment
Position of information
Perception of a hazard is improved when information referencing the imminent danger are associated together.
The position of incremental speed restriction signs influences the speed of vehicle drivers when approaching the
crossing.
91 Vehicle speed zones
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
wait at the level crossing.
96
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97
Straight roads increase the opportunities for vehicle drivers to undertake risky behaviour, to avoid having to
Straight roads
Stereotypical crossing users
Train arrival
Activation of the warning lights is used by passengers as a train arrival indicator.
102 Railway sidings
Alternative uses of railways sidings may alter the type of traffic using a level crossing.
Crossings located on routes used by emergency service vehicles may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
103 Emergency services
98
75
45
99
Level crossing type: AOCR104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Animals: Horses
Activated warnings at protected level crossings may result in undesirable behaviour by horses, and influence the
behaviour of other road vehicle users.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
Sightlines
Restricted or blocked sightlines may encourage users to move past a point of safety.
02
03
07
08
11
15
16
Level crossing type: ABCLDriver distractions
Distractions on the approach to a level crossing may impair the performance of both vehicle and train drivers.
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Road junctions close to the level crossing may result in increased decision making and errors by vehicle drivers,
and blocking-back over the crossing.
06
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Road junctions
Vehicle approach speed
The speed of the road traversing a level crossing is a factor in vehicle driver errors.
Age of drivers
Violations at level crossings may be influenced by the age of the local population.
10
HGV drivers form a disproportionately high number of incidents at level crossings.
Representation of HGV users
Pedestrian access
Pedestrian and passengers are more likely to undertake risky behaviour at vehicular level crossings where
bridges are not provided.
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school
day.
14 Time of day
Visual clutter
Superfluous information and roadside structures on the approach to the crossing may reduce the user’s
detection of level crossing information and warning signs.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
The onset of the amber and proceeding red lights of the activated warning system lead to various vehicle driver
behaviours at level crossings.
17 Understanding of warning lights
Closure time
The amount of time the user expects to wait at the level crossing may influence their risk taking behaviour.
Audible alarm
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
22
The effectiveness of flashing lights is limited by veiling glare, limited light output and their position.
Conspicuity of flashing lights
18
20
28
29
31
38
40
48
49
50
Level crossing type: ABCL26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Position of warning lights
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
Quantity of information
The quantity of signage information that can be read and understood decreases with road speed.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Location near rail stations
Level crossings adjacent to rail stations influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers and other users.
Parked cars before and after the level crossing may result in drivers slowing and stopping while on the level
crossing.
34 Parked cars
Visitor parking
The position of visitors parked vehicles at a level crossing may affect the behaviour of other road drivers.
Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
42 Days of the week
43 Suicide
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Observation of amber light
The length of activation time of the amber light has little affect on the behaviour of the vehicle driver.
Road access
Level crossings that provide the only access to routes either side of the crossing influences the risk taking
behaviour of vehicle drivers.
Passenger drop-off points
Non-designated passenger drop-off points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of traffic
approaching a level crossing.
Level crossing located in a dip or on a brow of a long straight road may result in increases of red-light running.
51
The effectiveness of information is reduced by HGV drivers parking in front of signs and warning devices.
52
See-through effect
HGV drivers using rail station facilities
53 Events
Events increase the amount of irregular users at level crossings.
Narrow roads before and after the level crossing may result in vehicle drivers slowing and stopping while on the
level crossing.
54 Narrow roads
57
62
63
64
66
70
71
72
73
Level crossing type: ABCL
The risk of vehicle drivers blocking-back over the level crossing, or general risk taking behaviour is increased
56
when the crossing is located on roads with direct access to major roads or motorways.
Location near major roads
Traffic calming systems
Road traffic calming systems on the approaches to a level crossing may increase the risk of vehicles
blocking-back.
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing surface
Roadworks
Roadworks positioned up to 3 kilometres from the level crossing may still impact on vehicles blocking-back.
Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
Another train approaching
The ‘Another Train Coming if lights continue to show’ sign has minimal impact in providing vehicle drivers with
sufficient information.
The environmental context of a rural level crossing reduces the awareness of approaching vehicle drivers.
69 Rural level crossings
Road markings
The effectiveness of vehicle drivers stopping in the correct location is impaired by worn road markings.
Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
Location near farms
High volumes of farm traffic impact on the speed and behaviour of other vehicles traversing the crossing.
Commercial traffic
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
Level crossings located in close proximity to another may influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers.
74 Proximity of level crossing to another
Combined environmental features
Level crossings with a combination of environmental features, such as bends, hills, trees and hedges, may
increase the decision making errors of vehicle drivers.
Road descents
Cats-eyes
Deteriorated ‘cats-eyes’ on the approach or on the level crossing may reduce the vehicle driver’s ability to
negotiate the road layout at night.
Level crossings located at the end of a descent may result in increased red-light running by vehicle drivers.
79
80
83
86
90
98
Level crossing type: ABCLTrain enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
School drop-off and collection points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of other vehicle
87
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88
The reliability and/or perception of reliability of the level crossing equipment affects the risk taking behaviour of
regular users.
89
drivers approaching the crossing.
School parking
Proximity of different road speeds
Level crossing equipment
Position of information
Perception of a hazard is improved when information referencing the imminent danger are associated together.
The position of incremental speed restriction signs influences the speed of vehicle drivers when approaching the
crossing.
91 Vehicle speed zones
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
wait at the level crossing.
96
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97
Straight roads increase the opportunities for vehicle drivers to undertake risky behaviour, to avoid having to
Straight roads
Stereotypical crossing users
Train arrival
Activation of the warning lights is used by passengers as a train arrival indicator.
102 Railway sidings
Alternative uses of railways sidings may alter the type of traffic using a level crossing.
Crossings located on routes used by emergency service vehicles may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
103 Emergency services
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Animals: Horses
Activated warnings at protected level crossings may result in undesirable behaviour by horses, and influence the
behaviour of other road vehicle users.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
75
45
Level crossing type: AHB02 Driver distractions
Distractions on the approach to a level crossing may impair the performance of both vehicle and train drivers.
03 Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Road junctions close to the level crossing may result in increased decision making and errors by vehicle drivers,
and blocking-back over the crossing.
06
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Road junctions
07 Vehicle approach speed
The speed of the road traversing a level crossing is a factor in vehicle driver errors.
08 Age of drivers
Violations at level crossings may be influenced by the age of the local population.
10
HGV drivers form a disproportionately high number of incidents at level crossings.
Representation of HGV users
11 Pedestrian access
Pedestrian and passengers are more likely to undertake risky behaviour at vehicular level crossings where
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed
restrictions etc., all contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’ time.
12
bridges are not provided.
Regularity of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school
day.
14 Time of day
15 Visual clutter
Superfluous information and roadside structures on the approach to the crossing may reduce the user’s
detection of level crossing information and warning signs.
16 Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
The onset of the amber and proceeding red lights of the activated warning system lead to various vehicle driver
behaviours at level crossings.
17 Understanding of warning lights
20 Audible alarm
18 Closure time
The amount of time the user expects to wait at the level crossing may influence their risk taking behaviour.
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
Level crossing type: AHB22
The effectiveness of flashing lights is limited by veiling glare, limited light output and their position.
Conspicuity of flashing lights
24 Half barrier
Automatic half barriers facilitate vehicle drivers to undertake risk taking behaviour.
Train speed and distance is underestimated by users, which may result in increased decision making errors by
users at level crossings.
25 Users perception of train speed & distance
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
28 Position of warning lights
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
29 Quantity of information
The quantity of signage information that can be read and understood decreases with road speed.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
31 Location near rail stations
Level crossings adjacent to rail stations influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers and other users.
32 Train speeds
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
33
Parked cars before and after the level crossing may result in drivers slowing and stopping while on the level
crossing.
34
Sighting distance
Parked cars
38 Visitor parking
The position of visitors parked vehicles at a level crossing may affect the behaviour of other road drivers.
40 Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
42 Days of the week
43 Suicide
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
49 Road access
48 Observation of amber light
The length of activation time of the amber light has little affect on the behaviour of the vehicle driver.
Level crossings that provide the only access to routes either side of the crossing influences the risk taking
behaviour of vehicle drivers.
Level crossing type: AHB
Non-designated passenger drop-off points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of traffic
approaching a level crossing.
50
Level crossing located in a dip or on a brow of a long straight road may result in increases of red-light running.
51
The effectiveness of information is reduced by HGV drivers parking in front of signs and warning devices.
52
Passenger drop-off points
See-through effect
HGV drivers using rail station facilities
53 Events
Events increase the amount of irregular users at level crossings.
Narrow roads before and after the level crossing may result in vehicle drivers slowing and stopping while on the
level crossing.
54
The risk of vehicle drivers blocking-back over the level crossing, or general risk taking behaviour is increased
56
Narrow roads
when the crossing is located on roads with direct access to major roads or motorways.
Location near major roads
57 Traffic calming systems
Road traffic calming systems on the approaches to a level crossing may increase the risk of vehicles
blocking-back.
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59 Foreign vehicle drivers
60 Bus stops
Unofficial bus stops in the level crossing lay-by, affects the behaviour of large or slow vehicle drivers.
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61 Crossing surface
62 Roadworks
Roadworks positioned up to 3 kilometres from the level crossing may still impact on vehicles blocking-back.
63 Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
64 Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
66 Another train approaching
The ‘Another Train Coming if lights continue to show’ sign has minimal impact in providing vehicle drivers with
sufficient information.
The environmental context of a rural level crossing reduces the awareness of approaching vehicle drivers.
69 Rural level crossings
71 Number of train lines
70 Road markings
The effectiveness of vehicle drivers stopping in the correct location is impaired by worn road markings.
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
72
73
79
80
83
86
90
Level crossing type: AHB Location near farms
High volumes of farm traffic impact on the speed and behaviour of other vehicles traversing the crossing.
Commercial traffic
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
Level crossings located in close proximity to another may influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers.
74
Large volumes of pedestrians and cyclists using road level crossings ignore the activated warning information
and barriers.
76
Proximity of level crossing to another
Pedestrians on vehicular crossings
Combined environmental features
Level crossings with a combination of environmental features, such as bends, hills, trees and hedges, may
increase the decision making errors of vehicle drivers.
Cats-eyes
Deteriorated ‘cats-eyes’ on the approach or on the level crossing may reduce the vehicle driver’s ability to
negotiate the road layout at night.
Road descents
Level crossings located at the end of a descent may result in increased red-light running by vehicle drivers.
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
School drop-off and collection points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of other vehicle
87
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88
The reliability and/or perception of reliability of the level crossing equipment affects the risk taking behaviour of
regular users.
89
drivers approaching the crossing.
School parking
Proximity of different road speeds
Level crossing equipment
Position of information
Perception of a hazard is improved when information referencing the imminent danger are associated together.
The position of incremental speed restriction signs influences the speed of vehicle drivers when approaching the
crossing.
91 Vehicle speed zones
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
wait at the level crossing.
96
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97
Straight roads increase the opportunities for vehicle drivers to undertake risky behaviour, to avoid having to
Straight roads
Stereotypical crossing users
Train arrival
Activation of the warning lights is used by passengers as a train arrival indicator.
98
Level crossing type: AHB102 Railway sidings
Alternative uses of railways sidings may alter the type of traffic using a level crossing.
Crossings located on routes used by emergency service vehicles may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
103 Emergency services
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
75 Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
45 Animals: Horses
Activated warnings at protected level crossings may result in undesirable behaviour by horses, and influence the
behaviour of other road vehicle users.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
03
16
63
64
Level crossing type: MCG
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
42
Trespassing on rail structures
Days of the week
43 Suicide
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing surface
Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
Location near farms
High volumes of farm traffic impact on the speed and behaviour of other vehicles traversing the crossing.
Level crossings located in close proximity to another may influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers.
74 Proximity of level crossing to another
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
71
72
86
90
75
Level crossing type: MCG
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88 Proximity of different road speeds
Position of information
Perception of a hazard is improved when information referencing the imminent danger are associated together.
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97 Stereotypical crossing users
102 Railway sidings
Alternative uses of railways sidings may alter the type of traffic using a level crossing.
Crossings located on routes used by emergency service vehicles may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
103 Emergency services
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
02
03
07
08
11
15
16
Level crossing type: MCB
Driver distractions
Distractions on the approach to a level crossing may impair the performance of both vehicle and train drivers.
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Road junctions close to the level crossing may result in increased decision making and errors by vehicle drivers,
and blocking-back over the crossing.
06
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Road junctions
Vehicle approach speed
The speed of the road traversing a level crossing is a factor in vehicle driver errors.
Age of drivers
Violations at level crossings may be influenced by the age of the local population.
10
HGV drivers form a disproportionately high number of incidents at level crossings.
Representation of HGV users
Pedestrian access
Pedestrian and passengers are more likely to undertake risky behaviour at vehicular level crossings where
bridges are not provided.
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school
day.
14 Time of day
Visual clutter
Superfluous information and roadside structures on the approach to the crossing may reduce the user’s
detection of level crossing information and warning signs.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
The onset of the amber and proceeding red lights of the activated warning system lead to various vehicle driver
behaviours at level crossings.
17 Understanding of warning lights
Closure time
The amount of time the user expects to wait at the level crossing may influence their risk taking behaviour.
Audible alarm
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
22
The effectiveness of flashing lights is limited by veiling glare, limited light output and their position.
Conspicuity of flashing lights
18
20
28
31
38
40
48
49
Level crossing type: MCB
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Position of warning lights
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Location near rail stations
Level crossings adjacent to rail stations influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers and other users.
Parked cars before and after the level crossing may result in drivers slowing and stopping while on the level
crossing.
34 Parked cars
Visitor parking
The position of visitors parked vehicles at a level crossing may affect the behaviour of other road drivers.
Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
42 Days of the week
43 Suicide
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Observation of amber light
The length of activation time of the amber light has little affect on the behaviour of the vehicle driver.
Road access
Level crossings that provide the only access to routes either side of the crossing influences the risk taking
behaviour of vehicle drivers.
Non-designated passenger drop-off points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of traffic
approaching a level crossing.
50
Level crossing located in a dip or on a brow of a long straight road may result in increases of red-light running.
51
The effectiveness of information is reduced by HGV drivers parking in front of signs and warning devices.
52
Passenger drop-off points
See-through effect
HGV drivers using rail station facilities
53 Events
Events increase the amount of irregular users at level crossings.
Narrow roads before and after the level crossing may result in vehicle drivers slowing and stopping while on the
level crossing.
54
The risk of vehicle drivers blocking-back over the level crossing, or general risk taking behaviour is increased
56
Narrow roads
when the crossing is located on roads with direct access to major roads or motorways.
Location near major roads
57
62
63
64
70
71
72
73
79
Level crossing type: MCB Traffic calming systems
Road traffic calming systems on the approaches to a level crossing may increase the risk of vehicles
blocking-back.
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing surface
Roadworks
Roadworks positioned up to 3 kilometres from the level crossing may still impact on vehicles blocking-back.
Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
The environmental context of a rural level crossing reduces the awareness of approaching vehicle drivers.
69 Rural level crossings
Road markings
The effectiveness of vehicle drivers stopping in the correct location is impaired by worn road markings.
Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
Location near farms
High volumes of farm traffic impact on the speed and behaviour of other vehicles traversing the crossing.
Commercial traffic
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
Level crossings located in close proximity to another may influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers.
74 Proximity of level crossing to another
Combined environmental features
Level crossings with a combination of environmental features, such as bends, hills, trees and hedges, may
increase the decision making errors of vehicle drivers.
Cats-eyes
Deteriorated ‘cats-eyes’ on the approach or on the level crossing may reduce the vehicle driver’s ability to
negotiate the road layout at night.
Road descents
Level crossings located at the end of a descent may result in increased red-light running by vehicle drivers.
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
School drop-off and collection points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of other vehicle
87
drivers approaching the crossing.
School parking
80
83
86
90
98
92
84
Level crossing type: MCB
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88
The reliability and/or perception of reliability of the level crossing equipment affects the risk taking behaviour of
regular users.
89
Proximity of different road speeds
Level crossing equipment
Position of information
Perception of a hazard is improved when information referencing the imminent danger are associated together.
The position of incremental speed restriction signs influences the speed of vehicle drivers when approaching the
crossing.
91
wait at the level crossing.
96
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97
Vehicle speed zones
Straight roads increase the opportunities for vehicle drivers to undertake risky behaviour, to avoid having to
Straight roads
Stereotypical crossing users
Train arrival
Activation of the warning lights is used by passengers as a train arrival indicator.
101
Certain conditions impair the signallers ability to detect objects on the level crossing.
Signal box: detection of objects
102 Railway sidings
Alternative uses of railways sidings may alter the type of traffic using a level crossing.
Crossings located on routes used by emergency service vehicles may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
103 Emergency services
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Double train lines
The space between two sets of double train lines provides users with a refuge point.
Signal box: camera angle
Position of the camera at a level crossing influences the signallers ability to detect objects.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Animals: Horses
Activated warnings at protected level crossings may result in undesirable behaviour by horses, and influence the
behaviour of other road vehicle users.
09
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23
High-visibility clothing appears white on black & white monitors.
Signal box: track side workers
Sunlight strobing
75
45
02
03
07
08
11
15
16
Level crossing type: MCB+CCTV
Driver distractions
Distractions on the approach to a level crossing may impair the performance of both vehicle and train drivers.
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Road junctions close to the level crossing may result in increased decision making and errors by vehicle drivers,
and blocking-back over the crossing.
06
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Road junctions
Vehicle approach speed
The speed of the road traversing a level crossing is a factor in vehicle driver errors.
Age of drivers
Violations at level crossings may be influenced by the age of the local population.
10
HGV drivers form a disproportionately high number of incidents at level crossings.
Representation of HGV users
Pedestrian access
Pedestrian and passengers are more likely to undertake risky behaviour at vehicular level crossings where
bridges are not provided.
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school
day.
14 Time of day
Visual clutter
Superfluous information and roadside structures on the approach to the crossing may reduce the user’s
detection of level crossing information and warning signs.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
The onset of the amber and proceeding red lights of the activated warning system lead to various vehicle driver
behaviours at level crossings.
17 Understanding of warning lights
Closure time
The amount of time the user expects to wait at the level crossing may influence their risk taking behaviour.
Audible alarm
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
22
The effectiveness of flashing lights is limited by veiling glare, limited light output and their position.
Conspicuity of flashing lights
18
20
28
38
40
48
49
Level crossing type: MCB+CCTV
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Position of warning lights
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30
Parked cars before and after the level crossing may result in drivers slowing and stopping while on the level
crossing.
34
Trespassing on rail structures
Parked cars
Visitor parking
The position of visitors parked vehicles at a level crossing may affect the behaviour of other road drivers.
Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
42 Days of the week
43 Suicide
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Observation of amber light
The length of activation time of the amber light has little affect on the behaviour of the vehicle driver.
Road access
Level crossings that provide the only access to routes either side of the crossing influences the risk taking
behaviour of vehicle drivers.
Non-designated passenger drop-off points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of traffic
approaching a level crossing.
50
Level crossing located in a dip or on a brow of a long straight road may result in increases of red-light running.
51
The effectiveness of information is reduced by HGV drivers parking in front of signs and warning devices.
52
Passenger drop-off points
See-through effect
HGV drivers using rail station facilities
53 Events
Events increase the amount of irregular users at level crossings.
Narrow roads before and after the level crossing may result in vehicle drivers slowing and stopping while on the
level crossing.
54
The risk of vehicle drivers blocking-back over the level crossing, or general risk taking behaviour is increased
56
Narrow roads
when the crossing is located on roads with direct access to major roads or motorways.
Location near major roads
Traffic calming systems
Road traffic calming systems on the approaches to a level crossing may increase the risk of vehicles
blocking-back.
57
62
63
64
70
71
72
73
79
80
Level crossing type: MCB+CCTV
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing surface
Roadworks
Roadworks positioned up to 3 kilometres from the level crossing may still impact on vehicles blocking-back.
Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
The environmental context of a rural level crossing reduces the awareness of approaching vehicle drivers.
69 Rural level crossings
Road markings
The effectiveness of vehicle drivers stopping in the correct location is impaired by worn road markings.
Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
Location near farms
High volumes of farm traffic impact on the speed and behaviour of other vehicles traversing the crossing.
Commercial traffic
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
Level crossings located in close proximity to another may influence the risk taking behaviour of vehicle drivers.
74 Proximity of level crossing to another
Combined environmental features
Level crossings with a combination of environmental features, such as bends, hills, trees and hedges, may
increase the decision making errors of vehicle drivers.
Cats-eyes
Deteriorated ‘cats-eyes’ on the approach or on the level crossing may reduce the vehicle driver’s ability to
negotiate the road layout at night.
Road descents
Level crossings located at the end of a descent may result in increased red-light running by vehicle drivers.
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
School drop-off and collection points close to level crossings affects the flow and behaviour of other vehicle
87
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88
drivers approaching the crossing.
School parking
Proximity of different road speeds
83
86
90
98
92
84
75
Level crossing type: MCB+CCTV
The reliability and/or perception of reliability of the level crossing equipment affects the risk taking behaviour of
regular users.
89 Level crossing equipment
Position of information
Perception of a hazard is improved when information referencing the imminent danger are associated together.
The position of incremental speed restriction signs influences the speed of vehicle drivers when approaching the
crossing.
91
wait at the level crossing.
96
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97
Vehicle speed zones
Straight roads increase the opportunities for vehicle drivers to undertake risky behaviour, to avoid having to
Straight roads
Stereotypical crossing users
Train arrival
Activation of the warning lights is used by passengers as a train arrival indicator.
101
Certain conditions impair the signallers ability to detect objects on the level crossing.
Signal box: detection of objects
102 Railway sidings
Alternative uses of railways sidings may alter the type of traffic using a level crossing.
Crossings located on routes used by emergency service vehicles may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
103 Emergency services
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Double train lines
The space between two sets of double train lines provides users with a refuge point.
Signal box: camera angle
Position of the camera at a level crossing influences the signallers ability to detect objects.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Animals: Horses
Activated warnings at protected level crossings may result in undesirable behaviour by horses, and influence the
behaviour of other road vehicle users.
09
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23
High-visibility clothing appears white on black & white monitors.
Signal box: track side workers
Sunlight strobing
45
03
16
27
Level crossing type: UWC
Unclear phone instructions provided within phone boxes at UWC may result in users failing to communicate with
the signaller.
01 Phone box instructions
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed
restrictions etc., all contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’ time.
12
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Regularity of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
19 Open gates
Open gates increases the risk to approaching users.
Unprotected crossings used during the hours of darkness may lead to increased decision making errors by
crossing users.
Darkness21
Train speed and distance is underestimated by users, which may result in increased decision making errors by
users at level crossings.
25 Users perception of train speed & distance
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Harvesting time
Harvesting time influences the risk taking behaviour of UWC users.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Train speeds
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
33 Sighting distance
Traffic moment
Telephone use
Level crossing users failure to use the telephone is a factor in incidents at UWC crossings.
High levels of traffic moment at user worked crossings increase the chances of an incident.
32
36
37
40
58
64
65
67
68
71
73
Level crossing type: UWC
Level crossings with high crossing utilisation increases the risks to users.
39 Crossing utilisation
Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
43 Suicide
The requirement to open and close the gate, following a procedure of crossing the tracks five times, is a factor in
why gates are left open at UWC’s.
46
Landowners failure to inform new contractors of the procedures and restrictions for using their vehicles across
the level crossing may increase the risk of an incident.
Contractors55
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Gate crossing procedure
Diversification in farming
Diversification in farming increases public access to user-worked crossings.
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61 Crossing surface
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
Crossing instructions
Ambiguous crossing instructions may result in users failing to undertake the correct crossing procedure.
Animals: Dogs
Unrestrained dogs may impair their owners concentration while on the level crossing.
Contacting the signaller
Unclear ‘user-type’ information may result in users failing to contact the signaller prior to crossing.
Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
Commercial traffic
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
Decision point
An obvious decision point is critical for users at unprotected level crossings.
Signal sections
Long signal sections increase the risk taking behaviour of users at UWC’s.
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88 Proximity of different road speeds
77
78
86
75
99
Level crossing type: UWC
The overall distance between UWC gates and the distance between the gate and first train line effects the risk
taking behaviour of vehicle users.
93 Distance between gates
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97
The dialogue between the level crossing user and the signaller may impact on the behaviour of the user.
100
Stereotypical crossing users
Communication with signaller
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
Sightlines
Restricted or blocked sightlines may encourage users to move past a point of safety.
03
16
27
Level crossing type: UWC+T
Unclear phone instructions provided within phone boxes at UWC may result in users failing to communicate with
the signaller.
01 Phone box instructions
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed
restrictions etc., all contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’ time.
12
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Regularity of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
19 Open gates
Open gates increases the risk to approaching users.
Unprotected crossings used during the hours of darkness may lead to increased decision making errors by
crossing users.
Darkness21
Train speed and distance is underestimated by users, which may result in increased decision making errors by
users at level crossings.
25 Users perception of train speed & distance
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Harvesting time
Harvesting time influences the risk taking behaviour of UWC users.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Train speeds
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
33 Sighting distance
Traffic moment
Telephone use
Level crossing users failure to use the telephone is a factor in incidents at UWC crossings.
High levels of traffic moment at user worked crossings increase the chances of an incident.
32
36
37
40
58
64
65
67
68
71
73
Level crossing type: UWC+T
Level crossings with high crossing utilisation increases the risks to users.
39 Crossing utilisation
Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
43 Suicide
The requirement to open and close the gate, following a procedure of crossing the tracks five times, is a factor in
why gates are left open at UWC’s.
46
Landowners failure to inform new contractors of the procedures and restrictions for using their vehicles across
the level crossing may increase the risk of an incident.
Contractors55
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Gate crossing procedure
Diversification in farming
Diversification in farming increases public access to user-worked crossings.
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61 Crossing surface
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
Crossing instructions
Ambiguous crossing instructions may result in users failing to undertake the correct crossing procedure.
Animals: Dogs
Unrestrained dogs may impair their owners concentration while on the level crossing.
Contacting the signaller
Unclear ‘user-type’ information may result in users failing to contact the signaller prior to crossing.
Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
Commercial traffic
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
Decision point
An obvious decision point is critical for users at unprotected level crossings.
Signal sections
Long signal sections increase the risk taking behaviour of users at UWC’s.
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88 Proximity of different road speeds
77
78
86
75
99
Level crossing type: UWC+T
The overall distance between UWC gates and the distance between the gate and first train line effects the risk
taking behaviour of vehicle users.
93 Distance between gates
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97
The dialogue between the level crossing user and the signaller may impact on the behaviour of the user.
100
Stereotypical crossing users
Communication with signaller
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
Sightlines
Restricted or blocked sightlines may encourage users to move past a point of safety.
02
03
08
16
18
20
27
Level crossing type: UWC+MWL
Driver distractions
Distractions on the approach to a level crossing may impair the performance of both vehicle and train drivers.
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Age of drivers
Violations at level crossings may be influenced by the age of the local population.
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed
restrictions etc., all contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’ time.
12 Regularity of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
Closure time
The amount of time the user expects to wait at the level crossing may influence their risk taking behaviour.
19 Open gates
Open gates increases the risk to approaching users.
Audible alarm
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Harvesting time
Harvesting time influences the risk taking behaviour of UWC users.
Position of warning lights
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Train speeds
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
33 Sighting distance
28
32
36
37
40
47
58
64
Level crossing type: UWC+MWL
Telephone use
Level crossing users failure to use the telephone is a factor in incidents at UWC crossings.
Traffic moment
High levels of traffic moment at user worked crossings increase the chances of an incident.
Level crossings with high crossing utilisation increases the risks to users.
39 Crossing utilisation
Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
Risk taking behaviour at level crossings increases on working days.
42 Days of the week
43 Suicide
The requirement to open and close the gate, following a procedure of crossing the tracks five times, is a factor in
why gates are left open at UWC’s.
46
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Gate crossing procedure
Violations at MWL
Over estimation of warning time and underestimation of crossing leads to risk taking behaviour.
Landowners failure to inform new contractors of the procedures and restrictions for using their vehicles across
the level crossing may increase the risk of an incident.
Contractors55
Diversification in farming
Diversification in farming increases public access to user-worked crossings.
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing surface
Vehicle shortcuts
Level crossings on roads used as shortcuts result in increased risk taking behaviour by vehicle drivers.
Crossing instructions
Ambiguous crossing instructions may result in users failing to undertake the correct crossing procedure.
Animals: Dogs
Unrestrained dogs may impair their owners concentration while on the level crossing.
Number of train lines
Road markings
The effectiveness of vehicle drivers stopping in the correct location is impaired by worn road markings.
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
65
67
70
71
73
86
75
99
Level crossing type: UWC+MWL
Commercial traffic
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
High road speeds in close proximity to a level crossing on a lower speed road influences the speed at which
vehicle drivers approach the crossing.
88
The reliability and/or perception of reliability of the level crossing equipment affects the risk taking behaviour of
regular users.
89
The overall distance between UWC gates and the distance between the gate and first train line effects the risk
taking behaviour of vehicle users.
93
Proximity of different road speeds
Level crossing equipment
Distance between gates
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97 Stereotypical crossing users
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
Sightlines
Restricted or blocked sightlines may encourage users to move past a point of safety.
03
16
20
Level crossing type: OC
Unclear phone instructions provided within phone boxes at UWC may result in users failing to communicate with
the signaller.
01 Phone box instructions
Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed
restrictions etc., all contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’ time.
12
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Regularity of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school
day.
14 Time of day
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
19 Open gates
Open gates increases the risk to approaching users.
Audible alarm
Second audible warning tone is not detected and/or understood by level crossing users.
Unprotected crossings used during the hours of darkness may lead to increased decision making errors by
crossing users.
Darkness21
Train speed and distance is underestimated by users, which may result in increased decision making errors by
users at level crossings.
25 Users perception of train speed & distance
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Harvesting time
Harvesting time influences the risk taking behaviour of UWC users.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Train speeds
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
33 Sighting distance
27
32
Level crossing type: OC
Level crossings with high crossing utilisation increases the risks to users.
39 Crossing utilisation
40 Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
43 Suicide
The requirement to open and close the gate, following a procedure of crossing the tracks five times, is a factor in
why gates are left open at UWC’s.
46
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Gate crossing procedure
53 Events
Events increase the amount of irregular users at level crossings.
Landowners failure to inform new contractors of the procedures and restrictions for using their vehicles across
the level crossing may increase the risk of an incident.
Contractors55
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61 Crossing surface
63 Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
67 Animals: Dogs
Unrestrained dogs may impair their owners concentration while on the level crossing.
71 Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
73 Commercial traffic
Level crossings with high volumes of commercial traffic may result in increased risk taking behaviour.
77 Decision point
An obvious decision point is critical for users at unprotected level crossings.
83 Road descents
Level crossings located at the end of a descent may result in increased red-light running by vehicle drivers.
86 Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97 Stereotypical crossing users
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
Level crossing type: OC
75 Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
Sunlight passing through lines of trees positioned on the side of the road imparts a strobing effect on the road
which may impair the visibility of vehicle drivers.
23 Sunlight strobing
99 Sightlines
Restricted or blocked sightlines may encourage users to move past a point of safety.
03
16
28
Level crossing type: FC Weather: Ice
Icy weather conditions on the approach, exit and on the crossing affects the behaviour of crossing users.
Regular users and those living close to level crossings are more likely to undertake risk taking behaviour when
using the crossing.
04
Crossings with a low frequency of trains are likely to increase the risk taking behaviour of regular users.
05
Variations in train schedules, such as engineering works, unexpected delays to train services, and line speed
restrictions etc., all contribute to fluctuations in trains passing a point at a supposedly ‘known’ time.
12
Users familiarity with a crossing
Frequency of trains
Regularity of trains
13 Groups
People in groups may undertake more risky behaviour, than when on their own.
Risk taking at level crossings increases during rush-hours, at midday and at the beginning and end of the school
day.
14 Time of day
Presence of rail staff
The presence of rail staff in high-visibility clothing can have an undesirable influence on level crossing user
behaviour.
19 Open gates
Open gates increases the risk to approaching users.
Unprotected crossings used during the hours of darkness may lead to increased decision making errors by
crossing users.
Darkness21
Train speed and distance is underestimated by users, which may result in increased decision making errors by
users at level crossings.
25 Users perception of train speed & distance
26 Foliage
The effectiveness of information on the approach to and at the level crossing is reduced by overgrown foliage.
Position of warning lights
The effectiveness of warning lights is influenced by their position.
Rail structures located at the entrance and exit areas to crossings that appear suitable for climbing may result in
undesirable risk taking behaviour by members of the public.
30 Trespassing on rail structures
Train speeds
Low train speeds may increase the risk taking behaviour of users.
Good sighting distance should indicate the level crossing as high risk.
33
Insufficient space between trackside gate and rail results in potential obstruction of track by bicycles and
pushchairs.
35
Level crossings with high crossing utilisation increases the risks to users.
39
Sighting distance
Position of safety
Crossing utilisation
32
Level crossing type: FC
40 Type of trains
Train lines with high frequency of both freight and passenger services may influence the risk taking behaviour of
users.
43 Suicide
Areas with high levels of foreign vehicle drivers may have increases in decision making errors at level crossings.
This may be more evident during seasonal periods.
59
Uneven and slippery level crossing surface may present a potential hazard to those using the crossing.
61
Level crossings are a potential target for use by persons attempting to commit suicide
Foreign vehicle drivers
Crossing surface
63 Housing developments
Housing developments increase road traffic and level crossing use.
67 Animals: Dogs
Unrestrained dogs may impair their owners concentration while on the level crossing.
71 Number of train lines
Single train lines may increase the risk taking behaviour of both vehicle drivers and pedestrians.
77 Decision point
An obvious decision point is critical for users at unprotected level crossings.
86 Train enthusiasts
To view trains closely, people undertake risky behaviour at level crossings.
Food and drink rubbish at a level crossing is often an indicator of young people using the crossing as a meeting
place.
Trespassers94
95 Noise
Noisy surroundings may impair the performance of the users to detect trains at level crossings.
Users who violate crossing procedures are not always male and in their twenties.
97 Stereotypical crossing users
104 Weather: Fog
The effectiveness of visual information is impaired by fog.
75 Public houses
Crossings located on route to public houses may result in increased violations of crossing procedures.
99 Sightlines
Restricted or blocked sightlines may encourage users to move past a point of safety.
Printed and published by the Health and Safety ExecutiveC30 1/98
Printed and published by the Health and Safety Executive C1.10 06/05
ISBN 0-7176-6132-6
RR 359
78071 7 661 329£30.00 9