level of detail for pipingstressanalysespiping stress analyses
TRANSCRIPT
Non-Proprietary
Level of Detail for Piping Stress AnalysesPiping Stress Analyses
Pre-Application Review Meeting
May 02, 2014
0 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietaryTable of Contents
I. Introduction
II C t D i A hII. Current Design Approach
III Proposed Design Approach
Mee
tin
g
III. Proposed Design Approach
IV. Open Discussion
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M
p
7thP
re
1 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-Proprietary
I I t d tiI. Introduction
2 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietaryPurpose of Meeting
KHNP needs to better understand the intent of NRC’s recent communications and clarify the scopeNRC s recent communications and clarify the scope of piping design work to be completed for the APR1400 DC application.
NRC has recently revealed its position on the level of detail for piping design in DC application: a heavy
Mee
tin
g
reliance on DAC may no longer be valid for the APR1400 DC application.
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M
No comments were identified during the acceptance review of the APR1400 DCD.
7thP
re
3 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietaryPiping Design Work Flow
Mee
tin
ge-
ap
pli
cati
on M
7thP
re
4 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietaryPiping Stress Analysis Work Flow
Mee
tin
ge-
ap
pli
cati
on M
7thP
re
5 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-Proprietary
II C t D i A hII. Current Design Approach
6 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietaryApplication of DAC to Piping Stress Analysis KHNP has applied DAC to piping stress analysis based on the following
NRC guidance: SECY 92-053 “Use of design acceptance criteria during 10 CFR Part 52 design
tifi ti i ”certification reviews” RG 1.206 C.III.5 “Design Acceptance Criteria” RG 1.215 “Guidance for ITAAC Closure Under 10 CFR Part 52” NEI 08-1 “Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure process Under 10 CFR Part
52”52
Completion of piping design based on the reference plant(SKN3&4) design is impractical due to the following reasons: Higher Seismic Loads
Mee
tin
g
Higher Seismic Loads Unavailability of Vendor Information Change of General Arrangement Change of ASME Code Edition
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M
To enable NRC safety determination, DAC & ITAAC has been identified in DCD Tier 1, Table 2.3 & 2.4 with two sample calculations.
7thP
re
7 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietarySummary of Piping Design Level of Detail
Class Scope DesignC l ti
Sample C l l ti
DAC Cl ITAACClass Scope Completion Calculation Closure ITAAC
RCS Piping Primary Stress
ASME Class 1 RCS
Branch DAC One S b t COL
Tier 1 Table 2.4.2-4,
2 4 4 7 4
Mee
tin
g
Branch Piping
DAC Subsystem COL 2.4.4~7-4
ASME
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M ASME Class 2&3
All Piping DAC One Subsystem COL Tier 1 Table
2.3-1
7thP
re
8 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietarySample Calculation
Two representative piping systems were selected for sample calculations.
Di t l i j ti t f t l t Direct vessel injection system from reactor vessel to containment penetration – SI101(Class 1&2)
Mee
tin
ge-
ap
pli
cati
on M
7thP
re
9 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietarySample Calculation (Cont’d)
Feedwater system from steam generator to containment penetration – FW101(Class 2)p ( )
Mee
tin
ge-
ap
pli
cati
on M
7thP
re
10 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietarySample Calculation Conformance Table with regard to DCD 3.12g
Mee
tin
ge-
ap
pli
cati
on M
7thP
re
11 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietarySample Calculation Conformance Table with regard to DCD 3.12 (Cont’d)g ( )
Mee
tin
ge-
ap
pli
cati
on M
7thP
re
12 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietarySample Calculation Conformance Table with regard to DCD 3.12 (Cont’d)g ( )
Mee
tin
ge-
ap
pli
cati
on M
7thP
re
13 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-Proprietary
III P d D i A hIII. Proposed Design Approach
14 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietaryApplication of Graded ApproachKHNP would like to suggest a graded approach as follows:
High Safety Significant Piping High Safety Significant Piping All class 1 piping MS & FW lines to the first 6-way rigid restraint beyond the isolation valves Piping systems design and stress analyses will be completed except for
i t l f ti l tienvironmental fatigue evaluation
Lower Safety Significant Piping Class 2&3 piping selected by Expert Panel through the failure mode &
Mee
tin
g
Class 2&3 piping selected by Expert Panel through the failure mode & effect analysis(FMEA) based on pipe hazard analysis of SKN 3&4 and safety significance of each piping.
• Detailed method and procedure of selecting class 2&3 piping will be proposed in the next PARM. A li f Cl 2&3 i i k dd h i i DAC ill b id d i
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M • A list of Class 2&3 piping packages to address the piping DAC will be provided in the DCD.
• The selected packages provide NRC with sufficient information to make a safety determination for resolving DAC.
Design documents and drawings will be prepared.
7thP
re
15 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Design documents and drawings will be prepared. Piping stress analyses will be performed by COL applicants
Non-ProprietaryPiping Design Scope of Work to be Completed
DescriptionDocuments/ D i
CurrentS
Forecast d
Class 1 Class 2&3Description / Drawings Status date >1” ≤2” ≥2.5”
Functional design criteria for mechanical systems andcomponents
System DesignCriteria (SDC)
Issued for DC Completed x x x
components
Preliminary system design description
System FunctionalDescription (SFD)
Issued for DC Completed x x x
Piping design methodology
DCD Tier 2, ch3.12 Issued for DC Completed x x x
Mee
tin
g
gy
Simplified piping & instrumentationdiagrams
Piping & Instrument Diagram (P&ID)
Issued for DC Completed x x
Process flow diagrams DCD Tier 2 Issued for DC Completed x x
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M or descriptions
Key piping parameters Piping Design Table (PDT)Line Index
Issued for DC
Not issued
Completed
12/2014
x
x
x
7thP
re
16 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-ProprietaryPiping Design Scope of Work to be Completed (cont’d)
DescriptionDocuments Current Forecast Class 1 Class 2&3
( )
Description / Drawings Status date >1” ≤2” ≥2.5”
Plant layout and arrangement information
• GA Drawings
• Piping Isometric d i
Issued for DC
27 piping S b t
Completed
12/2015 (for th )
x
x
x
x1
drawing Subsystems connected to major components
others)
Design specifications • Valve specification Not issued 12/2014 x
Mee
tin
g
for major components connected to piping systems
• Pump specification
12/2014 x
Preliminary piping stress analyses
• Summary report for class 1, 2&3
Two sample calculations
12/2015 x x2
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M y ,
• Design report for Class 1
12/2015(excluding environmental fatigue)
x
7thP
re
17 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
1. For Lower Safety Significant piping2. For MS & FW piping to the first 6-way rigid restraint beyond the isolation valves
Non-ProprietaryDocuments/Drawings Development
For For Class 1 Class 2&3 Documents/ Drawings For
reviewFor
audit&
>1” ≤2” ≥2.5”
Design reports for Class 1 piping1 x xg g
Summary report s of stress analysis results for class 1, 2&3 piping (TeR) 1 x x x2
Mee
tin
g
Piping isometric drawings x x x3
Line Index x x x2
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M
1. Excluding environmental fatigue evaluation2. For MS & FW piping to the first 6-way rigid restraint beyond the isolation valves
Valve/Pump Specifications x x
7thP
re
18 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
3. For Lower Safety Significant piping
Non-ProprietaryClarification Items
In the class 1 piping analysis can the In the class 1 piping analysis, can the environmental fatigue evaluation be left as a COL item ? NUREG/CR-6909(RG 1.207) is under revision. ASME Codes & Standards have not been developed
yet
Mee
tin
g
yet.
e-a
pp
lica
tion
M7th
Pre
19 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-Proprietary
IV O Di iIV. Open Discussion
20 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP
Non-Proprietary
THANK YOUTHANK YOUTHANK YOUTHANK YOU
21 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP