liam murray cancer epidemiology and prevention research group queen’s university belfast dublin...
TRANSCRIPT
Liam MurrayCancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research Group
Queen’s University Belfast
Dublin September 3rd 2009
The Northern Ireland Barrett’s Register: incidence and risk factors for progression to
cancer
What is Barrett’s oesophagus?
Shaheen NJ, Richter JE. Lancet 2009;373:850-861
Why is Barrett’s oesophagus important?
OAC trends by sex and deprivation category, England and Wales, 1986–2001
The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2008) 103, 2694–2699
Trends in Barrett’s oesophagus - USA
Conio et al Gut 2001;48:304-309
Copyright ©2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Corley, D A et al. Gut 2009;58:182-188
Recent trends in Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis in the USA
Copyright ©2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Corley, D A et al. Gut 2009;58:182-188
Recent trends in Barrett's oesophagus prevalence in the USA
Cancer risk in Barrett's oesophagus by study size
Rationale for the Northern Ireland Barrett’s Register
• Substantial increase in rate of diagnosis of BO
• Very large increases in prevalence of diagnosed BO
• Lack of clarity on cancer risk
• effectiveness/cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance?
• Groups at high risk of progression are not well established
• Biomarkers for progression have not been identified
• Very limited investigation of the factors associated with progression to cancer
• any modifiable lifestyle factors?
• How should BO patients be managed?
• What advice can Barrett’s patients be given?
The Northern Ireland Barrett’s Register(1993-2005)
All oesophageal biopsy specimens
from NI hospitals1993-2005
Biopsy at OGJColumnar Epithelium
of oesophagus
No Columnar
Epithelium
SIM
present Unclassified
DeathsIncident cancers
& HGD
Not present
Manual review
of path reports
Individual patients identified
Note review / Pathology review
Linkage to Cancer Registry / Death files
Malignancy
Prevalence of BO diagnosis in Northern Ireland
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
All BO
SIM
The Northern Ireland Barrett’s Register:follow-up data
Incidence of OAC in Barrett’s oesophagus
Patient Characteristics Number of patients (pyr), total events
Incidence of events (per 1,000 pyr)
oesophageal cancer
oesophageal and gastric cardia cancer
oesophageal cancer and HGD
oesophageal/ gastric cardia cancer and HGD
All patients 7585 (38076), 90 1.5 (1.1-1.9) 1.8 (1.4-2.3) 2.0 (1.6-2.5) 2.4 (1.9-2.9)
SIM at index biopsy
Present 3533 (18901), 73 2.34 (1.7-3.2) 2.9 (2.2-3.8) 3.3 (2.6-4.3) 3.9 (3.0-4.9)
Absent 2865 (15072), 12 0.4 (0.2-1.00) 0.7 (0.3-1.2) 0.6 (0.3-1.10 0.8 (0.4-1.4)
Unknown 1187 (4103), 5 1.0 (0.2-2.5) 1.2 (0.4-2.8) 1.0 (0.2-2.5) 1.2 (0.4-2.8)
Age at diagnosis
<50 2071 (10675), 12 0.5 (0.2-1.1) 0.7 (0.3-1.4) 0.9 (0.4-1.7) 1.1 (0.5-2.0)
50-59 1689 (8610), 19 1.0 (0.5-2.0) 1.5 (0.8-2.6) 1.7 (1.0-2.9) 2.2 (1.4-3.4)
60-69 1724 (8897), 34 2.4 (1.5-3.6) 3.1 (2.1-4.5) 3.0 (2.0-4.4) 3.8 (2.6-5.3)
70-79 1422 (7171), 16 1.8 (1.0-3.1) 2.0 (1.1-3.3) 2.1 (1.2-3.4) 2.2 (1.3-3.6)
80+ 679 (2733), 7 2.2 (0.8-4.8) 2.2 (0.8-4.8) 2.6 (1.0-5.3) 2.6 (1.0-5.3)
?Subgroups at high risk of progression from BO to OAC: Gender
Incidence of events per 1,000 pyr
Number of patients (pyr), total events
oesophageal cancer
oesophageal and gastric
cardia cancer
oesophageal cancer and
HGD
oesophageal/ gastric cardia
cancer and HGD
Male4413 (21949),
68 2.0 (1.5-2.7) 2.4 (1.8-3.2) 2.7 (2.0-3.50 3.1 (2.4-3.9)
Female3172 (16127),
220.7 (0.4-1.3) 1.1 (0.6-1.7) 1.1 (0.6-1.7) 1.4 (0.9-2.1)
Patients with endoscopically visible segment and SIM on histology
Male1582 (8423),
382.6 (1.6-4.0) 3.0 (1.9-4.4) 4.2 (2.9-5.8) 4.5 (3.2-6.2)
Female906 (4844),
172.1 (1.0-3.8) 2.9 (1.6-4.8) 2.7 (1.4-4.6) 3.5 (2.0-5.6)
The Northern Ireland Barrett’s Register
?Subgroups at high risk of progression from BO to OAC: Length of segment and dysplasia
Patient CharacteristicsNumber of patients (pyr),
total events
Incidence of events per 1,000 pyr
oesophageal cancer
oesophageal and gastric
cardia cancer
oesophageal cancer and HGD
oesophageal/ gastric cardia
cancer and HGD
All patients 2488 (13267), 55 2.4 (1.6-3.4) 2.9 (2.1-4.0) 3.6 (2.7-4.8) 4.1 (3.1-5.4)
Length of BO
Long 960 (5759), 30 3.1 (1.9-4.9) 3.8 (2.4-5.8) 4.5 (2.9-6.6) 5.2 (3.5-7.4)
Short 289 (1286), 3 0 (0-2.8) 0 (0-2.8) 2.3 (0.5-6.8) 2.3 (0.5-6.8)
Length unknown
1239 (6222), 222.2 (1.2-3.8) 2.7 (1.6-4.4) 3.1 (1.8-4.8) 3.5 (2.2-5.3)
DysplasiaNo
2136 (11253), 35 1.8 (1.1-2.9) 2.2 (1.4-3.2) 2.8 (1.9-3.9) 3.1 (2.1-4.3)
Low grade
182 (1032),13 8.8 (4.0-16.7) 9.8 (4.7-18.0) 11.7 (6.1-20.5)12.7 (6.7-21.7)
Unknown
170 (990), 5 2.0 (0.2-7.2) 4.0 (1.1-10.3) 3.0 (0.6-8.8) 5.0 (1.6-11.8)
Patients with endoscopically visible segment and SIM on histology
The Northern Ireland Barrett’s Register
Clinical factors associated with progression to OAC: interim results of the case note review
Factor Well-defined BO group
HR (95% CI) P value
Reflux symptoms at referral
No Unknown Yes
257 (23.5) 153 (13.9) 685 (62.6)
1 0.6 (0.2-1.8) 0.5 (0.2-1.0)
0.36 0.04
Markers of oesophageal inflammation
No/unknown Yes
563 (51.4) 532 (48.6)
1 2.4 (1.2-4.6) 0.01
PPIs No Yes
150 (13.7) 945 (86.3)
1 3.6 (1.1—11.6) 0.03
H2 antagonists No Yes
833 (76.1) 262 (23.9)
1 2.3 (1.1-4.5) 0.02
Aspirin No Yes
973 (88.9) 122 (11.1)
1 1.8 (0.7-4.8) 0.24
NSAIDs No Yes
1034 (94.4) 61 (5.6)
1 0.8 (0.2-3.3) 0.72
H. pylori eradication therapy
No Yes
887 (81.0) 208 (19.0)
1 0.8 (0.3-1.9) 0.56
Lifestyle factors associated with progression to OAC
Factor Well-defined BO group
HR (95% CI) P value
BMI <2525-<3030 or moreUnknown
78 (7.1)123 (11.2)
69 (6.3)825 (75.3)
11.0 (0.3-3.0)0.7 (0.2-3.3)0.6 (0.2-1.6)
0.930.700.30
Weight 1st quartile2nd quartile3rd quartile4th quartileUnknown
168 (15.3)180 (16.4)177 (16.2)185 (16.9)385 (35.2)
11.1 (0.3-4.7)1.8 (0.5-6.3)1.4 (0.4-5.2)2.6 (0.8-8.0)
0.880.380.580.10
Smoking NeverEx-smokerCurrentUnknown
471 (43.0)232 (21.2)256 (23.4)136 (12.4)
10.8 (0.4-1.9)0.6 (0.3-1.5)0.3 (0.1-1.1)
0.640.310.07
Alcohol None<10 units/wk10-20 units/wk>20 units/wkUnknown
337 (30.8)317 (28.9)149 (13.6)
71 (6.5)221 (20.2)
11.9 (0.8-4.8)1.0 (0.2-4.1)
4.3 (1.3-14.0)3.7 (1.4-10.0)
0.170.990.020.01
Conclusions
• Confirm a low risk of progression to cancer/HGD
• Groups at higher risk
• long segment BO
• dysplasia at baseline
• age 60-69 at baseline
• Rate of progression similar in men and women
• Oesophageal inflammation at diagnosis associated with increased risk of
progression?
• No lifestyle risk factors for progression identified
• Inadequate data from case note review
• Prospective cohorts of BO required
Northern Ireland Barrett’s Register: Investigators and funders
• Prof Liam Murray, CEPRG/NICR, QUB• Dr Brian Johnston, Belfast HSCT• Dr Anna Gavin, NICR, QUB• Dr Damian McManus, Belfast HSCT• Dr Helen Mulholland, CEPRG• Dr Lesley Anderson, CEPRG• Dr Shivaram Bhat, CEPRG
Collaborators• Dr Laura Hardie, Leeds University• Dr Rebecca Fitzgerald, University of Cambridge• Dr Lawrence Lovat, UCLH • Prof Marco Novelli, UCLH
Clerical staff• Kate Donnelly (Data abstractor)• Rosemary Ward (Data abstractor)
Ulster Cancer Foundation