library-based publishing in north america: coming of age
DESCRIPTION
Library-based Publishing in North America: Coming of Age. New Approaches in Library-based Publishing: COASP 2014, Paris, 17 – 19 September Charles Watkinson AUL, Publishing, University of Michigan Library Director, University of Michigan Press. What is happening currently? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Library-based Publishing in North America: Coming of Age
New Approaches in Library-based Publishing: COASP 2014, Paris, 17 – 19 September
Charles WatkinsonAUL, Publishing, University of Michigan Library
Director, University of Michigan Press
What is happening currently?• Wider context: North America• Local context: Michigan, Purdue
Why are libraries becoming publishers?• To challenge the status quo of scholarly publishing (?)• To meet unmet publishing needs• To educate the next generation of scholars
What’s next?• More Open Access monograph publishing• Richer monograph functionality• More collaborations with university presses
55% of academic libraries in North America developing or implementing a publishing program (79% of ARL).
115 libraries listed in the first Library Publishing Directory, 2014. Increasing to 125 + in 2015.
Library Publishing Coalition founded July 2014. Ca. 60 members.
Wider Context
LPC Directory libraries publish: approximately 400 faculty journals; 175 student journals; 1,000 monographs; 10,000 conference presentations; 100,000 ETDs; 100,000 technical/research reports.
Local Context
Michigan Publishing: 40 staff; approximately 100 books a year; 35 journals; 10 database products; institutional repository (Deep Blue); Print on Demand titles.
Purdue University: 9 staff; approximately 25 books a year; 12 journals; technical reports; conference proceedings; institutional repository (Purdue e-Pubs).
So why are librariesbecoming publishers?
To challenge the status quoThe Institutional Repository as a “publishing platform”
Approximately:• 80,000 items.• 25-35% “original”
publications.• Documents, images,
audio and video files.
• 10 million downloads a year.
To meet unmet publishing needse.g., niche journals
• Deeply important to small communities of scholars.
• Little capacity for author pays models.
• Require only lightweight workflows.
Conference proceedings, technical reports, white papers represent other opportunities.
Niche journals for small academic communities find a sustainable home with library-based publishers.
To educate the next generation
• Publication of student scholarship as a process not just a product.
• Scholarly communication outcomes, e.g., author rights.
• Information literacy outcomes, e.g., ethical citation practices.
58% of Library Publishing Directory libraries publish at least one undergraduate-driven journal.
What’s next?
. . . The future of the Open Access monograph is a big question mark.
More OA monograph publishing• Author
(institution/funder) pays?, e.g., AAU/ARL
• Library pays?, e.g., Knowledge Unlatched
• Freemium. Print sales subsidize Open Access online?, e.g., DCB
Richer monograph functionality
e.g., Hypothes.is allows annotation of and community engagement with Digital Culture Books
• Richly tagged XML for machine readability.
• Additional tools allow interaction with the content.
• Support for multimedia and other data types.
Greater collaboration with UPs2008/9 2010 2012 2014Alberta Alberta Alberta Alberta
Amherst Arizona Arizona ArizonaCalgary Calgary Calgary Calgary Cork Cork Georgia Georgia Georgia KentuckyMarquette Marquette Marquette Marquette Michigan Michigan MichiganMIT MIT MIT MITNebraska New England New EnglandNew York New York New York New York North Texas North TexasNorthwestern Northwestern Northwestern NorthwesternOregon State Oregon State Oregon State Oregon StatePenn State Penn State Penn State Penn StatePurdue Purdue Purdue PurdueStanford Stanford Stanford StanfordSyracuse Syracuse Syracuse Syracuse Temple Temple TempleTexas Christian Texas Christian Texas Christian Texas ChristianUtah Utah Utah Utah Utah State Utah State
West Virginia
• 27% of North American university presses report to libraries.
• (There does not need to be a reporting relationship for collaboration to exist.)
• The types of collaborations are becoming more strategic in nature.