lighting technologies, retrofits and redesign …2 ©2007 rensselaer polytechnic institute - all...
TRANSCRIPT
Daniel Frering, LCLighting Research CenterRensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Lighting Technologies, Retrofits and Redesign
Strategies for Colleges and Universities
2
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
NVLAP-accredited testing laboratory
30,000 ft² of research space near campus,
Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute
Research andeducation = $4-6 million/year
Lighting Research Center
3
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Introduction
• Lighting Technology Update– Energy-efficient lamps, luminaires, and controls– New or improved lighting technologies
• Energy-Efficient Lighting Retrofit and Redesign Ideas– Simple to more complex lighting retrofits or redesigns
• Case Studies– Examples of Energy-efficient lighting in educational
settings
4
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Linear Fluorescent
• Nomenclature
5
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Linear Fluorescent
• Color Designations• Select lamps with CRI 70+• Neutral CCT 3500 – 4100 K
6
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Are Super T-8s super?
• Another name: High Performance T-8s• There are no standards that describe what a
“super” T-8 is• Each manufacturer defines the product differently
7
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Standard vs. High Performance T8
CEE* StandardHP T8 T8
• Mean system efficacy (MLPW) > 90 85-92• Color rendering index > 81 75-82• Min. initial lamp lumens > 3100 2800-2900• Lamp life (hrs) > 24,000 20,000• Lumen maintenance > 94% 90%-92%
* Consortium for Energy Efficiency, High Performance T8 Specific* Consortium for Energy Efficiency, High Performance T8 Specificationsations
http://www.cee1.org/com/comhttp://www.cee1.org/com/com--lt/comlt/com--ltlt--specs.pdfspecs.pdf
8
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
NLPIP Lighting Answers - T8 Fluorescent Lamps
• Developments in 4 ft. 32 W T8 lamps• Provides overview of performance claims for initial light output,
rated life, lumen maintenance, and color• Generalization
– RE 70 = good– RE 80 = better– RE 80 LL HLO = marginally better: more $, more power, even
more light • Discusses uncertainties for specifiers associated with performance
attributes and with power requirements
5
1
1
3
3
5
9
1
3
3
1
5
8
9
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
6
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
1 11 1
1
1
1 16
7
3
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Correlated color temperature (K)
Lam
p ef
ficac
y (lu
men
s pe
r wat
t)
RE90
RE80
RE70
*T8 lamps with efficacy greater than 80 lumens per watt
81
RE80 RE80 HLO
LL
RE80 RE80 HLO
LL
RE80 RE80 HLO
LL
RE80 RE80 HLO
LL
RE80 RE80 HLO
LL
RE80 RE80 HLO
LL
3500 K 4100 K 3500 K 4100 K 3500 K 4100 K
Manufacturer A Manufacturer B Manufacturer C
Manufacturer and correlated color temperature
Lam
p ef
ficac
y (lu
men
s pe
r wat
t)
HLO - high light outputLL - long life
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
CalculatedMeasured
9
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Where do I use Super T8s?
• Retrofit– One-for-one replacement of existing lamps
• Increases work surface illuminance– Replace lamp and ballast with Super T8 and low ballast
factor ballast• Maintain work surface illuminance and reduce energy
requirements by 14%– Redesign lighting system, reduce number of fixtures
• Maintain work surface illuminance and reduce energy requirements by 16%
10
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Where do I use Super T8s?
• New construction/remodeling– Design lighting system with Super T8
• Use less fixtures and less energy, assuming necessary fixture spacing can be achieved (lower first cost and operating cost)
– Design lighting system with Super T8 and low ballast factor ballast• Use same number of light fixtures; energy needs are
reduced by 14% (lower operating cost)
11
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Reduced Wattage T-8 Options
Description Watts CCT K CRI Initial Lumens
Mean Lumens
Rated Life*
Standard T8 - 800 series Lamps 323000 3500 4100
86 2,950 2,800 20,000
Super T8 Lamps 323000 3500 4100
86 3,100 2,950 30,000
253000 3500 4100
85 2,400 2,28025,000 (12-hr. Start)
303000 3500 4100
86 2,900 2,750 20,000
283000 3500 4100
82 2,725 2,560 18,000
Energy Saving Lamps
12
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
T5 vs. T8
• Which is more efficient?
13
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
What is a T5?
• The “T” represents lamp shape–tubular.
• The number following represents lamp diameter in eighths of an inch. A T5 has a diameter of 5/8”.
• A T5 has a miniature bi-pin base while T8 and T12 lamps use medium bi-pin bases.
14
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
T5 lumen maintenance vs. T8?
• Both T5 and T5HO lamps keep a better lumen maintenance level than T12 and most T8 lamps.
• They are claimed to retain 95% of light output at 8,000 burning hours (40% of rated average life).
• An improved phosphor coating reduces mercury absorption, leading to a higher lumen maintenance value.
(Online catalog of Philips Lighting)
15
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
83900.905981880.88598592322,7142,950F32T8
85751.0011785751.001179381545,0004,400F54T5HO
94841.006283750.9063104 93282,9002,610F28T5
35°Clm/W
25°Clm/WBFInput
(W)35°Clm/W
25°Clm/W
BFInput(W)35°C25°C(W)35°C25°C
Manufacturer BManufacturer AEfficacy (lm/W)WattInitial lumen
(lm)
Lamp-ballast system efficacyLamp efficacy
Lamp type
T5 vs. T8
• Catalog data
16
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Do T5 lamps provide more light than standard T8 lamps?
• Ambient temperature significantly affects light output
• T5s rated @35°C
• Ballast loss is another factor – The maximum system efficacy at the optimal
temperature for each lamp-ballast system (T5 and T8) appears to be nearly identical on average
17
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Optical Efficiency: 1-lamp T5HO vs. 2-lamp T8
(a) 1-T5HO (b) 2-T8
18
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
T5 Lamps: Conclusions
• Where should T5s be used?
Lower ceiling height
Smaller # of luminaires
Similar system efficacyLower running cost
Small<=Project=>LargeLower initial cost
Higher uniformity
Higher-end design
T8T5T5HORequirements
19
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Compact Fluorescent (CFL)
• Types– Pin-base for dedicated fixtures– Screw-base self-ballasted
• Modular• Integral
20
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs)
• Screw-base– Swirl / “twist” / “dairy queen”– Circline, 2C (double circline), 2D– Covered (“bullet”, “globe”, “A-line”)– Reflector
21
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Compact Fluorescent (CFL)
Color• CRI
– generally high – Typical CRI is 82
• CCT– Range (similar to linear T8 and T5)– 2700K, 3000K, 3500K, 4100K, 5000K
22
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Compact Fluorescent (CFL)
• Life (average rated)– Life rated at 3 hours per start
•Frequent switching will reduce life– Lower wattage typically 10,000 hours– Higher lumen output twin tube up to
14,000 hours
23
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Ballasts for Fluorescent Lamps
Types• Magnetic
– Low frequency (60 Hz) operation– May produce audible hum– May produce noticeable lamp flicker– Inefficient lamp operation
• Electronic– High frequency (20 to 60 kHz) operation– Quiet – No noticeable lamp flicker– More efficient lamp operation
24
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Ballasts for Fluorescent Lamps
Electronic Ballast Types• Instant start
– Most efficient – May sacrifice lamp life if frequently switched– Cannot be dimmed
• Rapid start and Programmed start– Generally consumes an additional 2 watts– More gentle starting for frequent switching– Can be dimmed (if a dimming ballast is
selected)
25
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Ballast Factor
• Measures the ability of the ballast to produce light using the lamps it is intended to operate
• Must be considered when determining lighting system efficacy
• A lower ballast factor will reduce light output but will typically use less energy
BF = Lumens on Commercial BallastLumens on Reference Ballast
26
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Pulse Start Metal Halide
• Range of wattage - 50 to 450 W• Efficacy of 60-100 lm/W• Color Rendering Index 65 – 75 or better• Formats available ED17, 28 & 37
27
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Probe-start vs. Pulse-start
• Pulse-start – Faster warm-up and restrike– Improved efficacy– Longer lamp life
(up to 50%)– Improved lumen
maintenance (33%)– Improved color
stability over life
28
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
HID vs. Fluorescent for High Bay Applications• Which works better?
29
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Why use fluorescent lighting?• Uses 10%-20% less energy• Can be dimmed, switched• Can be controlled by motion
sensor• Linear source, good for lighting
vertical surfaces• Longer life (24,000 hours)• Better/more consistent color• If using fluorescent lighting in high
bay applications, ensure fixture optics are suited for this purpose
30
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Why use metal halide?
• Fewer fixtures to install (lower initial cost)
• Fewer lamps to stock and change• Bi-level operation• Newer metal halide lamps provide
– Better color rendering than older technology
– Higher maintained lumens per watt (pulse start) than older technology
– Improved efficacy with electronic ballasts
31
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Automatic Shut-off Lighting Controls
• Time clocks• Occupancy sensors• Panel relays• Centralized controls
• These work,but implementation depends on wiring, installation, commissioning, etc.
32
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Time Clocks
• Turns lighting circuits on/off on pre-set schedule
• Electronic – allow up to 32 building zones, great scheduling flexibility
• Caution – more programming options may be too complex
• Manual override important in offices, etc.
33
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Time Clocks
• Use to control spaces with predicable occupancy (offices, classrooms, libraries, hallways, exteriors, etc.)
• Installed on lighting panel or building control system; can be retrofitted
• Proper commissioning/ programming important
• ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 – mandated for buildings over 5,000 sq.ft.
34
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Motion/Occupancy SensorTechnology Issues
• Three technology types– Infrared– Ultrasonic – Dual technology
• All are mature technologies• Excellent payback potential• Work well with proper
selection and positioning
35
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Passive Infrared (PIR)
36
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Passive Infrared (PIR)
What are PIRs best at detecting?• Movements in a direct line of sight from the sensor—
PIRs cannot look around corners • Movements across the field of view (across the
segments) rather than movements toward or away from the sensor
What can cause “false triggering”?• People walking by in adjacent spaces that are visible to
the sensor (e.g., through a doorway)• Surfaces with sunlight falling on them (e.g., desks near
south-facing windows)• HVAC outlets or other machinery that heat up nearby
objects
37
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Ultrasonic
Ultrasonic waves emitted into the room at a constant pitch
Ultrasonic waves reflecting from a moving object back toward sensor
38
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Ultrasonic Occupancy Sensor
What are ultrasonic sensors best at detecting?• Movement in any part of the space, even around
corners or behind obstructions such as washroom partitions
• Movement toward the sensor, rather than movement across the space
What can cause “false triggering”?• People walking by in adjacent spaces that are
within the sensor’s range• Any object blown around by the wind or by the
ventilation system, such as plant foliage or mobiles.
• High velocity air currents from HVAC systems
39
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Duel Technology or Hybrid
• Combines both technologies in one product
• Most expensive options• Very sensitive to motion while
preventing “false triggering”(critical areas such as machine operation, health care)
40
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Motion Sensor Economics
How much energy do occupancy sensors save?
Owned SharedSpace Space
Sporadic Use: 25% 40%Scheduled Use: 30%
• However, savings for a specific space may vary from these mean numbers.
41
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Photosensor Technology Issues
• Analog design of control algorithm makes it difficult to accurately adjust the photosensor during commissioning
• Lack of manual controls to adjust photosensor to individual preferences
• Minimal integration with other lighting controls, i.e.,occupancy sensors
• Can save 20 to 40 % of lighting energy if installed and commissioned properly
42
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Daylight Dimming
• Development and evaluation of newly improved photosensor– Wireless, remote sensor– Self-commissioning– Occupant preference
adjustment independent of commissioning
– Switching + dimming– Compact size – Efficient (~1.2 watts @ 120V)– Microprocessor based Commissioning time < 3
minutes in most cases!
Sponsor: Connecticut Light and Power
43
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02Time
Cum
ulat
ive
ener
gy u
se (
kWh)
Without photosensorWith photosensor
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02Time
Cum
ulat
ive
ener
gy u
se (
kWh)
Without photosensorWith photosensor
Daylight Dimming
“We have eliminated commissioning hardships by using microprocessor-based logic functions and control algorithms..”
Andrew Bierman
Sponsor: Connecticut Light and Power
44
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Fluorescent Lamps Weren’t Designed for Dimming
• What compatibility issues exist to allow fluorescent lamps and dimming ballasts to work together without degradation to lamp life?
45
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Daylighting Controls: Making Them Work
• Daylighting controls require:– Proper selection of the
correct controller for the design situation
– Proper location of the controls
– Proper adjustment to ensure correct operation
46
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
DaySwitch
• Automatic on/off• Designed to retrofit• Low cost
47
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Dayswitch Energy Savings Potential
Energy savings comparision of systems in open office plans for different cities
15%12%
14%
17%
13%
24%
19%22%
28%
20%
37%35%
37%39%
34%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Albany NY Sacramento CA Portland OR Charlotte NC Phoenix AZ
Ener
gy s
avin
gs o
ver b
ase
case
Dayswitch DaySwitch and AutoBlinds Perfect dimming
48
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Manual Dimming Controls
• Provide flexibility and control– Comfortable & functional visual environment– visual tasks have the right light level when and where required– dimming (or switching) is available for immediate darkening or
high illumination– different needs of adjacent areas are accommodated
49
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Manual Dimming Controls
– Typically wall mounted (easily accessible location)– Office workers & teachers rate dimming highly as a lighting benefit– Allows more flexibility for presentations, computers, etc. – Many occupants will keep their lights dimmed for significant periods
of time – Studies have shown that providing dimming control can save 10 to
15 % of lighting energy
50
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Manual Dimming Controls
• Dimming fluorescent lamps will require a dimming ballast and compatible dimming control
• HID Lamps have limited dimming capabilities• Consider switching strategies
– Tandem wiring of fixtures– No dimming ballast required– Still allows flexibility in adjusting lighting – High / low levels– Works well with HID systems
51
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Lighting and Load Management
• Lighting is an ideal electric end use for load management– Available in virtually every building– Easy to control– Easy to measure the results– The load reduced is repeatable– Can reduce the amount of lighting rather than
turn it off, thereby preserving productivity• Occupants find 30% to 50% reduction
acceptable
52
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Panel-level Power Reducers
• Installed on entire lighting circuits• Can be used on fluorescent or
HID lighting• Reduces voltage to the ballasts• Reduce power by 25%• Cannot be used with self
regulating ballasts
53
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Load Shed Ballast System
54
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Efficacy & projected efficacy of LEDs
White LED (R&D)
Incandescent
Projected for SSL
Fluorescent
0
50
100
150
200
250
1990 2000 2010 2020
Year
Effic
acy
(lm/W
)
White LED (commercial)
OIDA Technology Roadmap update 2002
55
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
LED products: Luminaires
• Hundreds of products at every trade show– Colored applications – RGB – General illumination – white
• Adjustable color temperature
©Color Kinetics 3000 K 3500 K 6500 K
©io Lighting ©Lumileds
56
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Summary – LEDs
• LEDs are evolving very rapidly• Currently there are many niche applications for
LEDs– Consumer electronics– Automotive/transportation– Full color dynamic displays– Architectural lighting (colored and white)
• Exploiting the unique attributes of LEDs will lead to successful applications
57
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Full Spectrum Lighting
• No standard definition of full spectrum lighting
• Manufacturer Claims include– Better visibility, improved color rendering, better
health, slows aging of the retina, reducing chances of skin cancer, improved mood, improved scholastic performance, greater productivity
• A survey conducted by the LRC showed that most people believe these claims
58
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Full Spectrum Lighting
• There is no evidence to support most claims associated with full spectrum lighting
• Light Sources promoted as full spectrum can cost over 10 times as much as nearly identical products that do not bear the full spectrum claim
• Full spectrum light sources generally have efficacies 30% to 40% lower then conventional fluorescent lamps.
59
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Lamp Spectral Power Distribution (SPD) & Task Performance
• Belief – Amount of light can be reduced, and task performance maintained, if lamps with high CCT’s>5000K are used
• Basis – Lamps with higher CCTs cause smaller pupil size, which allows increased focus
• Use of high CCT lamps is being suggested as an energy saving measure
60
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Lamp SPD & Task Performance
• Research results – Lamp spectrum does not affect task performance at
typical light levels – Lamps with higher CCTs will be perceived as brighter at
the same illuminance – Many people feel that high CCT lamps make a space
feel “cold,” “clinical,” “uninviting”
• Conclusion– There is no support for the belief that lamps with high
CCT will improve task performance
Energy-Efficient Lighting Retrofits
Steps to take to reduce lighting energy use
62
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Lighting and Energy Savings
• Lighting represents between 30 and 40 % of a typical college’s or university’s energy costs.
• An energy-efficient lighting system can typically save thousands of dollars per year.
• Energy-efficient lighting strategies present easy opportunities without major expense.
• Energy saving strategies for lighting range from simple to complex.
• Choose the most efficient lighting equipment.
63
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Efficacy
• The amount of light emitted by the total lamp power input.
• It is expressed in lumens per watt (lm/W)
Lamp efficacy: total luminous flux (lm)total lamp power input (W)
System efficacy:rated lamp lumens x BF total input watts (lamp + ballast)
64
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Efficiency = Lumens emitted by a luminaireLumens emitted by the lamp(s)
Luminaire Efficiency
• The ratio of light (lumens) emitted by a luminaire to that emitted by the lamp or lamps used therein.
• Percentage of initial lamp lumens that are ultimately emitted by the luminaire
65
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Simple – Turn Lights Off
• Turning lights off in unoccupied rooms saves between 8 and 20% of lighting energy.
• Entire college needs to participate– Energy efficiency needs to be a
university goal– Organize student “light patrols.”
• Don’t turn lights on in the morning until people arrive.
• At night, most of the lighting should be turned off.
66
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Simple – Clean Lighting Fixtures
• Dirt and dust on lighting fixtures reducing the efficiency by 15% a year.
• Periodically clean lamps and fixtures with a soft, dry cloth.
• Replace diffusers (lenses) when they begin to yellow.
67
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Simple retrofits
• Exit signs – replace with ENERGY STAR, saves 80 to 95% of energy
• Replace T-12 lamps & ballasts with T-8 lamps & electronic ballasts.
• Replace incandescent lamps with CFLs where appropriate
• Delamp T-8 fixtures if areas are over-lighted (cautions)
68
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Install Occupancy Sensors
• Use in rooms that are intermittently occupied:– Classrooms– Faculty lounge– Staff room– Storage areas– Restrooms
• Less than 3 year payback though energy savings• Incentive $ available in some States to help pay
for purchase and installation
69
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Time controls
• Use time clocks to automatically turn lights off at a preset time in areas that have predictable occupancy hours– Offices– Libraries– Auditoriums– Some classrooms– Exteriors
70
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Photosensors
• Proper commissioning is very important.
• Use them to switch lights off in areas with a lot of daylight.
• Use then to dim lights in areas with more variable daylighting conditions.
71
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Renovation – Lighting Redesign
• Lighting system replacement should be considered if the existing lighting system is:– More than 15 years old– Not operating properly– System components are deteriorating– Inefficient and/or ineffective (Watts per sq. ft.)
• Redesign should also be considered if: – The space is over lighted– Other renovations are being undertaken– The lighting is not providing the necessary conditions
Case Study: Integrated Classroom Lighting System (ICLS)
Funded by the California Energy Commission
System to be tested in New York State in 2007
Case Study presentation courtesy of FineLite.
73
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Study Methodology• Evaluated wide-range of products that would be
available by 2005
• Designed and installed a preliminary ICLS system
• Installed an improved ICLS in 18 classrooms in 6 schools
• Monitored actual usage and energy consumption for a year
• Conducted teacher preference surveys
• Installed an enhanced ICLS at SCE training center
• Developed a report that documents the study
74
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
ICLS Findings:• Use high-performance, pendant indirect luminaires• Provide an Audio / Visual (A/V) mode under teacher control• Locate easy-to-use controls at the front of the classroom• Use dual technology occupancy sensors with teacher-
controlled delay• Tie the parts together with low-voltage, plug-and-play
cables• Ensure one manufacturer assumes system responsibility• Offer options including:
– Photo-sensors for daylight control– A dedicated whiteboard luminaire– Dimming for A/V presentations
75
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
How the system works: General Mode: light faces, light vertical wall surfaces, cut
glare
• Walls and ceilings are well lit
• But, veiling reflections can wash out the screen.
• One simple switch removes all veiling reflections.
• The lighting changes from “GENERAL” to “A/V MODE.”
76
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
How the system works:A/V operation reduces veiling reflections
• The screen now looks sharp
• Downlight delivers the right light on desks
• Dimming can be added as an option.
77
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
How the system works: General Mode: Two outboard lamps are switch on
• The ICLS luminaire is wired so the outboard lamps are separate from the center lamp.
78
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
How the system works:A/V operation reduces veiling reflections
• Reflector over center lamp is 96% reflective
• 100% of light directed down to the desks
79
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
ICLS typical layout
• Luminaires– 2-rows– 14-foot centers– 24-inch suspension– Perpendicular to
whiteboard– For over 50 foot
candles at less than one watt / square foot, use 3100 lumen T8 lamps and 1.2 BF electronic ballasts
80
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
ICLS w/ whiteboard Layout• Pendant Luminaires
– 2-rows pendant luminaires
– 14’ centers– 24” suspension– Perpendicular to
whiteboard• Whiteboard Luminaire
– 12’ Length– 1T8 cross section– 30” Setback from wall– 12” Suspension
81
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
ICLS typical layout
• Controls and sensors– TCC by whiteboard– Occupancy sensor
in center of the room
– Row switches by door(s)
– Control Pack above door
Teacher Control Center
Control Pack Occupancy Sensor
82
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
ICLS typical layout
• Interconnections– Low voltage– Plug-and-play
between TCC, sensors, and Control Pack
– Row switches (high voltage)
Teacher Control Center
Dual Occupancy Sensors
Row Control
83
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
ICLS is energy efficient
84
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
ICLS is cost effective
NA0.80$955$1,100($1.15 / sq ft)
3rd Row(3 Rows / room)
2-3 years0.20$355$500($0.52 / sq ft)
A/V Dimming (2 Rows, 1-Lamp)
3-6 Months0.47$30$175($0.18 / sq ft)
Daylight Switching(each row)
Immediate!0.80- $145$2,600($2.71 / sq ft)
ICLS System(A/V + Occupancy)
None1.35$0$2,745 ($2.86 / sq ft)
15 Parabolics
PaybackEnergy (w/sq.
ft.)DifferenceInstalled CostAlternative
85
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Teachers prefer ICLS 9 to 1
86
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Heritage Oak control classroom(1.75 watts / sq foot)
87
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Heritage Oak ICLS system(0.8 watts / square foot)
88
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Dudley Elementary School(1960’s vintage fixtures, 1.7 watts / sq ft)
89
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Dudley Elementary School(Low Voltage Retrofit, 0.9 watts / sq ft)
90
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Lessons Learned - Classrooms
• Control daylight to minimize direct and reflected glare and reduce light levels for audio-visual programs or computer work
• Provide switches at the instructor’s desk in a video projector environment
• Illumination of white boards must be considered carefully
91
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Case Study – Community College
Computer ClassroomsLocation of lighting and / or furniture location matters:• Visibility:
• light levels for video projection vs. taking notes• Comfort:
• Darker and shadows along walls in periphery classrooms • reflections on computer screens in front-facing classrooms
92
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Case Study – Community College
Computer Classrooms• Classrooms with video
projector may require low light levels
• Low ambient levels increase visibility of projector images, BUT may interfere with student note taking
• Location of video projectors and below-ceiling luminaires must be carefully coordinated
93
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Conclusions
• When evaluating existing lighting conditions you need to consider – efficiency (energy use),– Maintenance, and – Effectiveness (how well the lighting meet the needs of
the people who use the space).
• Illuminance (the amount of light) is not the only factor to consider in performing a lighting evaluation
94
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Conclusions
• Lighting efficiency strategies can save a significant amount of energy is a typical school – between 20 and 60 % depending upon technologies
selected and existing conditions
• There are many strategies that can be considered– Choose the most efficient equipment (lamps, ballasts,
lighting fixtures, controls)– Turn lights off when not needed (manual or automatic)– Use daylighting where possible (be careful with
controls)– Consider a lighting redesign if needed and cost effective
95
©2007 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - All Rights Reserved
Thank you!Additional Information
www.lrc.rpi.edu
Dan Frering, LCManager of Education
Lighting Research CenterRensselaer Polytechnic Institute