limnological analysis of blue lake
DESCRIPTION
Limnological Analysis of Blue Lake. Prepared by: Bryce Oldemeyer , Adrienne Roumasset , BenVaage and Ryan Johnson. Blue Lake, Idaho. Kettle Origin (Wetzel, 2001) Rainbow Trout and Bullhead “Bottomless” Dimictic Stratifies Turns over twice a year. Trophic Levels in Blue Lake. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Limnological Analysis of Blue Lake
Prepared by: Bryce Oldemeyer, Adrienne Roumasset, BenVaage and Ryan Johnson
Blue Lake, IdahoKettle Origin
(Wetzel, 2001)Rainbow Trout and
Bullhead“Bottomless”Dimictic
StratifiesTurns over twice a
yearGoogle Earth
TroutBullhead
Zooplankton
Phytoplankton
Trophic Levels in Blue Lake
Goals of Zooplankton SamplingDetermine zooplankton abundance and
distribution in Blue Lake.Make inferences about data concerning:
Status of the lakeForaging of fishTrophic cascade
MethodsOverview
Measure photic zone using Secchi disk.Sample zooplankton at four points on the lake.At each point, sample above and below photic
zone.
PHOTIC ZONE: Upper depths of lake where light can penetrate and facilitate plant growth. (Wetzel, 2001)
Transects and Sampling Locations on East Side of Blue Lake
Littoral Zone: Shallow zone, emergent macrophytes can grow
Pelagic Zone: Deeper zone, free open water
EQUIPMENT
Secchi disk: Measures photic zoneSchindler trap: Collects zooplankton at discrete depthsPlankton net: Collects integrated samples
Results of Chlorophyll-A in Blue LakeFour sites sampled in replicates of 3, and the
average [Chla] was 4.43µg/L. And a range of 2.7-6.7 µg/L.
1 2 3 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8Chla
Chla
Site
Chla
(µg
/L)
Results of Total Phosphorus in Blue LakeExcluding outliers, average [TP] for Blue
Lake was 12.45 µg/L. And a range of 10-41µg/L.
10
5
10
15
20
25
30
Average [TP] for all Sites and total lake average
Average Site 1Average Site 2Average Site 3Average Site 4Total Average Blue Lake
Sites
[TP]
µg/
L
Zooplankton ObservedCeriodaphnia cyclopoid calanoid
www.google.com/images
www.google.com/images
www.google.com/images
Results of Pelagic Zooplankton -Two transects sampled in triplicates in
both the photic and aphotic zone.
Ceriodaphnia Cyclopoids Calanoids0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Average zooplank-ton/L distribution in
photic zone
Cerio-daphnia
Cyclopoids Calanoids0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Average zooplank-ton/L distribution in
photic zone
Transect 1 Transect 2
Results of Pelagic ZooplanktonOverall, aphotic zone yielded fewer
zooplankton counts.
Cerio-daphnia
Cyclopoids Calanoids0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Average zooplank-ton/L distribution in
aphotic zone
Cerio-daphnia
Cyclopoids Calanoids0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Average zoo-plankton/L distri-bution in aphotic
zone
Transect 1 Transect 2
Results of Littoral ZooplanktonSampled two transects in triplicates.
Ceriodaphnia Cyclopoids Calanoids0
5
10
15
20
25
Average zoo-plankton/L distri-bution in littoral
zone
Cerio-daphnia
Cyclopoids Calanoids0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Average zoo-plankton/L distri-bution in littoral
zone
Transect 1 Transect 2
Results for Blue Lake Zooplankton
Photic Aphotic Littoral0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Average zooplank-ton/L distribution in
Blue Lake
Photic Aphotic Littoral0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Average zoo-plankton/L distri-
bution in Blue Lake
-Average zooplankton for both transects in photic zone was 103/L-Aphotic zone average was 49/L-Littoral zone was 36 zooplankton/L.
Transect 1 Transect 2
Discussion: Macrophyte RemovalBenefits CostsRemove macrophytes for
a more aesthetically pleasing pond.
Possibly better swimming waters.
Absence of macrophytes reduces cover for large zooplankton (Wetzel, 2001).
Increase phytoplankton numbers, due to lack of grazing (Wetzel, 2001).
Macrophytes shade phytoplankton, especially lilies.
Macrophyte Management SuggestionRemoving macrophytes may make Blue Lake
less “blue”.Still large amounts of organic sediment and
steep gradient.Leave macrophytes, increase large
zooplankton populations, increase quality of fish, and keep water quality constant.
Fishery ManagementRelatively low
nutrients* Following classifications given in Wetzel, 2001
Increasing fish abundance
Potential resource strain
Oligotrophic Blue Lake Eutrophic
Chl A 0.3-3 µg/L 2.7 - 6.7 µg/L 10-500 µg/L
TP <5 µg/L 10-41 µg/L >30 µg/L
Results of Resource StrainStunted growth in fish
(Kohler, and Hubert, 1999)
Decreased quality of fish (Kohler, and Hubert, 1999)
Altered zooplankton composition (Brooks, and Dodson, 1965)
Increase in phytoplankton (Timms, & Moss, 1984)
(+) “Small” Z.P.(-)“Large” Z.P.
RBT and Bullhead
(+) Phytoplankton
Zooplankton concernsSelective predatory
pressure creates favorable conditions for smaller zooplankton.
Smaller zooplankton consume less phytoplankton than larger zooplankton (Wetzel, 2001)
Ultimately increases phytoplankton abundance
(+) “Small” Z.P.(-)“Large” Z.P.
RBT and Bullhead
(+) Phytoplankton
“Green” waterLarge abundance of
phytoplankton cause “green” water (Wetzel, 2001)
Large ZP can help control phytoplankton (Timms, & Moss, 1984)
www.google.com/images
Management SuggestionBullhead and RBT removal
Catch and KeepA rainbow trout of 220 mm
tends to feed upon zooplankton ranging from 1.2 mm to 2.4 mm (Haddix et al, 2005).
Reducing number of trout will increase larger zooplankton in Blue Lake Remaining trout will have more
available forage and will be healthier
Larger zooplankton will become more abundant.
Reduces chances of “green water”
(+) “Small” Z.P.(-)“Large” Z.P.
RBT and Bullhead
(+) Phytoplankton
Results of RemovalRemove RBT and Bullhead
Increased fish forage
Increased large ZP
Increased phytoplankt
on consumption
Increased H20 clarity and decrease
“green” H20 possibilityDecrease Intra
and Inter species
competition
Better Quality Fish
Recommended ActionsCatch and Keep!
Begin removing all fish caught
As time progresses, primarily target smaller fish
Occasionally keep larger fish
www.google.com/images
References Kohler, C. and Hubert, W. (1999). Inland fisheries management in north america, 2nd edition.
Maryland: American Fisheries Society. Wetzel, Robert. (2001). Limnology, Third Edition: Lake and River Ecosystems. Academic Press. Haddix, Tyler, P. Budy, R. Schneidervin (2005). Zooplankton size selection relative to gill raker
spacing in rainbow trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134: 1228-1235. Kohler, C. and Hubert, W. (1999). Inland fisheries management in north america, 2nd edition.
Maryland: American Fisheries Society. Brooks, J, & Dodson, S. (1965). Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Journal of the
American Chemical Society, 85, 835 Timms, R, & Moss, b. (1984). Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations
by zooplankton grazing, in the presence of zooplanktivorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnology and Oceanography, 29(3), 472-486 .