linking biological responses to river processes › ncer2009 › pptpdf... · linking biological...
TRANSCRIPT
Linking bioLogicaL responses to river processesA Focal Species Approach to Restoration and Management of the Sacramento River
Bruce K. Orr1, Clifford S. Riebe1,2, and Ryan A. Peek1,3
1Stillwater Sciences, 2855 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 400, Berkeley, CA 947052 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 3 Department of Biology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Copies of the Linkages Report and other reports from the Sacramento Ecological Flows Study can be found online at:
http://www.delta.dfg.ca.gov/erp/sacriverecoflows.asp
Identify critical management issues using a representative yet manageable subset of information
Suggest actions that are likely to produce desirable benefits for the ecosystem
Identify remaining uncertainties and inform development of study plans
•
•
•
The Ecosystem Linkages Study was undertaken as part of the Sacramento River Ecological Flows Study, which was initiated by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) in collaboration with ESSA Technologies, Stillwater Sciences, UC Davis, and UC Berkeley to define how flow characteristics (e.g., the magnitude, timing, duration, and frequency) and associated management actions (such as gravel augmentation and changes in bank armoring) influence the creation and maintenance of habitats for a number of native species that occur in the Sacramento River corridor.
What are the effects of flow and other riverine processes on species
and habitats in the Sacramento River ecosystem?
Linkages Study Goals
Six focal species were selected to represent a wide range of habitats and riverine processes (see table below).
Species Selection
Introduction
cHaLLengeThe processes, habitats, and species of the Sacramento River have been the focus of much study, and the volume of available reports and datasets poses a challenge for synthesizing information and organizing a discussion of ecosystem components. Divergent conceptual models about process–habitat–biotic linkages complicate the process of summarizing what is known about the Sacramento River, and add to the challenge of evaluating alternative approaches for conserving and restoring the
river ecosystem.
soLUtionTo help overcome these challenges, the Linkages Report
discusses and analyzes the Sacramento River through the lens of six focal species. A focal species approach
facilitates the exploration of linkages among ecosystem processes, resultant habitats, and biotic needs.
AcknowledgementsWe thank the following for contributing data and results and photographs from recent or ongoing studies:
Barry Garrison, Ron Schlorff, Carolyn Rech (CDFG) Lisa Micheli (Sonoma Ecology Center)Koll Buer (GOOD Geotechnical Consultants)Tara Morgan and Adam Henderson (CDWR)Mike Roberts and Greg Golet (TNC)Steve Greco (UC Davis)Nadav Nur (PRBO Conservation Science)Joe Silveira (USFWS)
••••••••
And the following for serving as report reviewers:
Greg Golet, Ryan Luster, Mike Roberts, Campbell Ingram (and others at TNC)Numerous workshop and public review participants from CDWR, CDFG, USFWS and other agencies
•
•
This study was funded by grants to The Nature Conservancy from the CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program (# ERP-02D-P61) and the
Resources Legacy Fund Foundation.
Western Pond Turtle
FIGURE 1 Habitats associated with chute cutoffs.
ccurs
FLOWING SIDECHANNEL
(former main channel)
Lake Occurs
OXBOW SLOUGH
OXBOW LAKE
EMERGENT WETLANDOR SWAMP
RIPARIAN FOREST
Periodic Inundation byModerate to High Flows
WETLAOR S
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
New Main Channel
Eventual Reset by Progressive
Migration or Chute Cutoff
OrganicDebris
Main Channel Meander Bend
Progressive Channel Migration
Occurs
Sinuosity/CurvatureThreshold Reached
Chute Cutoff Occurs
Upstream Sediment Plug Forms
Downstream Sediment Plug Forms
Sedimentation in Lake Occurs
Continued Sedimentation
Riparian Vegetation Dynamics/Succession
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Flows Above Cutoff Threashold
Occurs
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Variable Flow Hydrograph
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Periodic Inundation by Moderate to High Flows
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Inundation byHigh Flows
Interactions with RiverSediment
Load
with Geologic
Riparian
Interactions
Constraints and
Vegetation
ccurs
FLOWING SIDCHANNEL
(former main channel)
FLOWING SIDCHANNEL
(former main channel)
Lake Occurs
OXBOW SLOUGH
OXBOW LA
WETLAOR S
RIPARIAN FOREST
Periodic Inundation byModerate to High Flows
WETLAOR S
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Flows Above BankErosion ThresholdFlows Above BankErosion Threshold
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
New Main Channel
Eventual Reset by Progressive
Migration or Chute Cutoff
OrganicDebris
OrganicDebris
Main Channel Meander Bend
Progressive Channel Migration
Occurs
Sinuosity/CurvatureThreshold Reached
Chute Cutoff Occurs
Upstream Sediment Plug Forms
Downstream Sediment Plug Forms
Sedimentation in Lake Occurs
Continued Sedimentation
Riparian Vegetation Dynamics/Succession
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Flows Above Cutoff Threashold
Occurs
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Flows Above Cutoff Threashold
Occurs
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Variable Flow HydrographFlows Above BankErosion Threshold
Variable Flow Hydrograph
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Periodic Inundation by Moderate to High Flows
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Periodic Inundation by Moderate to High Flows
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Inundation byHigh Flows
Flows Above BankErosion Threshold
Inundation byHigh Flows
Interactions with RiverSediment
Load
Interactions with RiverSediment
Load
with Geologic
Riparian
Interactions
Constraints and
Vegetation
with Geologic
Riparian
Interactions
Constraints and
Vegetation
with Geologic
Riparian
Interactions
Constraints and
VegetationRiparian
Interactions
Constraints and
Vegetation
Interactions
Constraints and
Vegetation
DecnovoctseptaugJulyjuneMayaprMarFebJanlife stage
juvenile and adult overwintering
juvenile growth and adult activity
Hatchling overwintering
Hatchling emergence –northern pattern
Hatchling emergence –southern pattern
Egg incubation
nesting
Month
DecnovoctseptaugJulyjuneMayaprMarFebJanlife stage
juvenile and adult overwintering
juvenile growth and adult activity
Hatchling overwintering
Hatchling emergence –northern pattern
Hatchling emergence –southern pattern
Egg incubation
nesting
Month
TABLE 1 High flow timing is critical because eggs are sensitive to moisture.
Bank Swallow
species key HabitatsKey Processes and Characteristics of the Ecosystem
Chinook SalmonOncorhynchus tshawytscha
gravel deposits, pools, eddy/point-bar complexes, side channels and sloughs, inundated floodplains
coarse sediment transport and bed surface scourwater temperature regimeavailability of cover and/or slow water during high flowstiming and magnitude of flowfish passage barriers
•
••
••
SteelheadOncorhynchus mykiss
gravel deposits, pools, eddy/point-bar complexes, side channels and sloughs, inundated floodplains
availability of cover and/or slow water during high flowswater temperature regimetiming and magnitude of flowfish passage barriers
•
•••
Green SturgeonAcipenser medirostros
deep pools, gravel deposits
water temperature regimetiming and magnitude of flowfish passage barriers
•••
Bank SwallowRiparia riparia
steep cutbanks bank erosionprogressive meander migrationmeander bend cutofftiming and magnitude of flow
••••
Western Pond TurtleClemmys marmorata
oxbow lakes, side channels and sloughs, pools, inundated floodplains
progressive meander migrationmeander bend cutofftiming and magnitude of flowterrestrialization of off-channel water bodies
••••
Fremont CottonwoodPopulus fremontii ssp. fremontii
point bars, side channels and sloughs, oxbow lakes, inundated floodplains
vegetation successiontiming and magnitude of flowmeander migrationterrestrialization of off-channel water bodies
••••
The Sacramento River and its tributaries provide important nesting locations for bank swallow, accounting for approximately 70% of the bank swallow nesting in California. Losses in habitat and declines in the number of individuals and colonies suggest Sacramento River population may be highly prone to extirpation.Implication: persistence of bank swallows in California is at risk.
•
•
•
FIGURE 2 Average number of bank swallow burrows per kilometer of 1997 centerline channel plotted against average meander migration rates for the Sacramento River.
Natural processes of progressive meander migration and channel cutoffs create freshly eroded banks that are an essential component of bank swallow nesting habitat.This relationship is apparent in the distribution of bank swallow colonies and nesting burrows: most nesting occurs in the actively migrating reaches of the river (see Figure 2).
•
•
Riverine Processes and Bank Swallow Habitat
LOW SUITABILITY• high risk of nest failure
due to inundation, bank slumping, or bank erosion
HYDROGEOMORPHICPROCESSES
PROGRESSIVE CHANNEL MIGRATION
CHUTE CUTOFF
UNSUITABLENear Vertical
Fresh (≤ 3 years old)Cutbanks available in March and April
Friable soils present
Bank Height >2 meters and
Bank Length >25 meters
Grasslands and Other Foraging Habitat <200 meters from Colony
No High Flows or Rapid draw-downs during nesting (April–June)
• high predation risk
• high ectoparasite loads (in old nests)
UNSUITABLE• soils do not support
burrow construction
LOW SUITABILITY• high predation risk• high risk of inundation or
other disturbances
LOW SUITABILITY• high energetic cost of
foraging for adults when feeding nestlings
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
HIGH FLOWS
BANK EROSION
High habitat suitability
FIGURE 3 Conceptual model of the influences of hydrogeomorphic processes and physical and physical habitat conditions on habitat suitability for bank swallow nesting in riverine systems.
H A B i tAt S u i tA B i l i t y M o d E l
California’s only native freshwater turtle and a state Species of Special Concern In large alluvial systems like the Sacramento River, the western pond turtle appears to rely predominantly on off-channel water bodies, such as oxbow lakes and sloughs, as it’s primary habitat Historically, the Sacramento Valley provided huge tracts of riparian forests and floodplain wetlands: over 95% of these floodplain wetlands have been lost
•
•
•
importance of off-channel Waterbodies
Bank eroding flows can be good or bad for bank swallows, depending on the tim-ing of such flows (see Figure 4).
i M P o R tA n C E o F H i g H F l o W t i M i n g
BEN
EFic
iAL
RENE
WAL O
F NESTiNG SiTES
DISRUPTION OF PAIR
BONDING AND
DELAYED NESTING
DISRUPTION OF NESTING AND NESTLING REARING WITH HIGH MORTALITY
Marc h
april
Ma y
juneJuly
Aug .
sept .
oct.
nov.
Dec. jan.
Feb.
March
april
Ma y
juneJuly
Aug .
sept .
oct.
nov.
Dec. jan.
Feb.
FIGURE 4 Timing of high flow impacts to nesting
bank swallows.
i M P o R tA n C E o F H i g H F l o W t i M i n g
Off-channel water bodies (e.g., sloughs and oxbow lakes) are created by meander migration and channel cutoff processes. Once formed, off-channel water bodies eventually vanish from the floodplain as they are colonized by vegetation and filled with sediment and organic detritus during overbank flow events (Figure 1). Quantifying how these processes have changed is important for under-standing the long-term evolution of remaining off-channel water bodies.
•
•
•
A key potentially limiting factor for the western pond turtle is the rela-tionship between water level and flow in off-channel water bodies during the summer incubation sea-son (see Table 1). During incuba-tion, eggs are extremely sensitive to increased soil moisture, literally exploding in wet conditions from internal pressure caused by water absorption.
Effects of Flow on Seedling Establishment
Key Management ConsiderationsW E S t E R n P o n d t u R t l E
B A n K S WA l l o W F R E M o n t C o t to n W o o d
FIGURE 5 Nearly half of the channel from Red Bluff to Colusa (RM 243-143) is now covered by rip-rap on at least one side. This photograph, taken in December 2006, shows a recent bank armoring project near RM 182. (Photo courtesy of Joe Silveira, USFWS)
B A n K A R M o R i n g P R o j E C t S C A u S E d i R E C t l o S S o F H A B i tAt
Manage high flows to promote natural bank erosion in the middle Sacramento River before the beginning of the breeding season (late March) while maintaining stability throughout the summer during the nesting season.
Identify locations where levee setbacks are likely to create a larger meander zone and thus promote natural bank erosion processes and increase potential nesting habitat.
•
•
Conserve cutbanks, remove riprap, and retire bank armoring, as appropriate, in locations where meanders are likely to migrate into soils that are suitable for nesting colonies.
Evaluate stage-discharge relationships at key bank swallow nesting sites.
•
•
Period of peak ac�vity
Period of off-
Period of peak ac�vity
Period of moderate ac�vity
Period of off-peak/low-level ac�vity
Conduct basic surveys to assess the abun-dance and distribution of western pond turtle.
Manage flow regimes to promote the natural bank erosion, meander migration, and chan-nel cutoff in the middle Sacramento River.
•
•
Implement opportunities to retire bank armoring and/or setback levees in the middle Sacramento River.
Manage flows during the summer nesting season to reduce risk of nest inundation.
•
•
Manage the recession limb of spring high-flow events and summer base flows in wet water years to promote seedling es-tablishment of cottonwoods and willows.
Promote of channel migration to create new seedbeds for cottonwood recruit-ment through scour and fine sediment deposition.
•
•
Promote strategic horticultural restoration on higher floodplains surfaces where passive recruitment is infeasible.
Prioritize actions to eradicate and control invasive plant species.
•
•
Cottonwood seedlings require bare mineral sub-strates (typically found on recently formed point bar surfaces) and appro-priate soil moisture con-ditions for successful es-tablishment (Figure 6).
Altered flow regimes below large dams can substantially reduce the frequency and extent of successful establishment of new cohorts of cot-tonwood seedlings
Flow conditions during spring and summer are key factors affecting cot-tonwood seedling sur-vival.
•
•
•
Fremont Cottonwood
Riparian vegetation dynamics are tightly coupled with riverine processes. Flooding, scour, and sediment deposition strongly influ-ence riparian plant species composition, distribution, and physical structure and are major drivers of riparian com-munity succession.
•
•
L i n k i n g r i v e r i n e p r o c e s s e s A n d V E g E tAt i o n dy n A M i C S
•
D = Disturbance RecurrenceInterval
R = Recovery Phase Dura�on
P = Persistence
Dura�on
Fluvial Geomorphic Processes
Infrequent Flood Disturbance (R<D)
Frequent Flood Disturbance (R>D)
D
PR
Bio
mas
s
Time
TimeD
R
Bio
mas
s
Hig
h
Low
Low
Freq
uenc
y of
Flo
odin
g R
elat
ive
Elev
atio
n
Dep
th to
Gro
undw
ater
Low
Hig
h
Hig
h
ErosionProgressive channel migra�on
Channel avulsion/cutoff
Late -Seral Communi�esValley oak riparian forest
Elderberry savanna
Recent Alluvial Deposi�onChannel bar deposits
•Abandoned channel/backwater depositsOverbank floodplain deposits
Pioneer Scrub Communi�esWillow scrub
Pioneer ForestCommuni�es
• Co�onwood forest
Mid Seral Communi�esMixed riparian forest
Fluvial Geomorphic Processes
Infrequent Flood Disturbance (R<D)
Frequent Flood Disturbance (R>D)
D
PR
Bio
mas
s
TimeD
PR
Bio
mas
s
Time
TimeD
R
Bio
mas
s
Hig
h
Low
Low
Freq
uenc
y of
Flo
odin
g R
elat
ive
Elev
atio
n
Dep
th to
Gro
undw
ater
Low
Hig
h
Hig
h
Hig
h
Low
Low
Freq
uenc
y of
Flo
odin
g R
elat
ive
Elev
atio
n
Dep
th to
Gro
undw
ater
Low
Hig
h
Hig
h
Phase
FIGURE 7 Conceptual model of the influence of flood disturbance and flu-vial geomorphic processes (sediment transport, ero-sion, deposition) on ripar-ian vegetation succession. Along geomorphically ac-tive meandering streams, riparian vegetation typically exhibits two distinct pat-terns or pathways of initial establishment: colonization on bare substrates associ-ated with point bars created by progressive channel mi-gration, and bare substrates associated with abandoned channels or oxbow lakes and sloughs created by me-ander cutoffs and channel avulsion.
F IGURE 6 This figure shows the generalized pattern of successful seedling recruitment observed for cotton-woods and willows along alluvial rivers. Seedlings that germinate too high on the bank cannot grow roots fast enough to keep up with the receding water table and soil moisture level during the hot summer months, while seedlings that initiate too low on the bank are removed by scour during high flow events during the subsequent winter or spring. Recent work at three point bars between RM 192–172 indicates that successful cottonwood recruitment occurs at relative elevations of 3–9 ft (1–3 m) above summer baseflow levels.
Water table decline too rapid for seedling survival
Seedlings killed by later floods
Successful recruitmentSand bar
Summer base flow
High Flood line
t
The Sacramento Valley has lost over 98% of its riparian forests since 1850.The greatest extent of cot-tonwood riparian forest remaining along the Sacra-mento River occurs in the 100 river miles between Red Bluff and Colusa.
•
•
Fremont cottonwood is the dominant tree species of near-river forests where it provides ecological struc-ture to the riparian corridor by stabilizing substrates, fix-ing carbon, generating LWD, and creating habitat for wildlife species.
•
Relatively modest changes in the managed flow regime of the Sacramento River, coupled with physical habitat restoration, could improve the extent, quality, and uti-lization of habitat for multiple species (see table 2).
•
CONCLUSIONS
CHANGE FLOWS to promote off-channel rearing
Species affected
Remove Revetment
to promote plant succession
to enhance meander migra�on
in upper river
Fremont
co�onw
ood
western
pond turtle
bank sw
allow
green sturgeon
steelhead
Chinook
CHANGE FLOWS
Management ac�on
REMOVE REVETMENT
CHANGE FLOWS
ADD GRAVEL
Fremont
co�onw
ood
western
pond turtle
bank sw
allow
steelhead
Chinook
? ?
primary benefit to species
secondary benefit or poten�ally adverse impact
effects depend on �ming and magnitude of flows
?
TABLE 2 Examples of management actions that might benefit multiple species. Note that in same cases, actions beneficial to one species might have negative effects on other species. See Linkages Report and Final Report for more details.
Successful restoration of the Sacramento River eco-system will depend in large part on the preservation and enhancement of natural river migration processes, which are critical to the formation and preservation of off-channel habitats as well as to the healthy exchange of sediment from the mainstem to the floodplain.
The idea that active meander migration is critical to ecosystem health is at the heart of the “meander zone” concept. An assemblage of conservation partners has striven to assemble a coherent meander zone for the last 20 years by acquiring flood-prone lands from willing sell-ers within the floodway corridor. Some of the acquired lands have been actively restored by planting native veg-etation.
Considerable uncertainty remains regarding some “link-ages” between management actions and the ecological targets of restoration managers. Because these linkages are complex and interdependent, additional study is re-quired to identify and optimize flow management sce-narios that are consistent with a multiple benefit design strategy.
•
•
•