literary criticism syllabus 2014-15

6
En8NEDU Literary Criticism First Semester, AY 201415 Instructor: Maria Teresa (Trina) Tinio Monday/Thursday, 9:0010:30, EB802 Course Description: Literary Criticism is the study, analysis, and evaluation of literature. This course proceeds from the assumption that literary texts are different form ordinary, everyday speech and from practical prose such as scientific, business, and technical writing, and everyday writing such as letter, blog, or report writing. Literature (novels, short stories, poetry, literary essays), on the other hand, is seen as a special kind of writing that works on its own special aesthetics, codes, and conventions. It is the unfamiliarity with these special aesthetics, codes, and conventions that make literature appear, to the ordinary reader, dense and distanced or deep and unknowable. The student of literature must first understand these aesthetics, codes, and conventions in order to understand literature. In high school, the emphasis in the study of literature has been on the story, meaning, or theme of the literary piece and on the values imparted. This is what is known as literature’s content. Collegiate study of literary must emphasize a more complete and deeper analysis by involving these aesthetics, codes, and conventions. This is what is known as literature’s form. The evaluation or critique of literature then applies not only to the content of literature but to the form as well. The teaching of high school literature also emphasized understanding the moral values conveyed by the literary text. Literature, however, especially contemporary literature, is very rarely written with the objective of conveying a direct, didactic and moral point. A disjunct then exists between how literature is often studied (extracting a moral) and the actual conventions of literature (literature as an expression of lived experience). The collegiate approach to literature has to focus instead on an understanding about what each literary piece conveys about the actual values (materialism, patriarchal values, modernism, technology and efficiency, etc.) or the interplay and negotiation of conflicting values and practices (global v. local, modern v. traditional). This course is a practical course where students will be expected to write critiques of contemporary literature. Whereas most other courses entitled Literary Criticism take a historical approach and study writers of the past who have tried to theorize on the aesthetics of literature (Aristotle, Alexander Pope, T.S. Eliot, etc.), this course focus on getting students to write complete and comprehensive literary critiques that first provides a precise and concise summary, second a thoughtful appreciation of the methods employed by the author, and third conveys an opinion on the value of the work. Course Objectives: At the end of the course, the student is expected to: 1. appreciate why it is important to understand and teach literature 2. better understand the aesthetics, codes and conventions of literature 3. write precise but concise summaries of literary works 4. identify and explain the literary techniques used by the author 5. express one’s opinion on the value of the literary work based on what it conveys about actual and/or conflicting values

Upload: trinatinio

Post on 22-Jul-2016

380 views

Category:

Documents


24 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Literary Criticism Syllabus 2014-15

En8N-­‐EDU      Literary  Criticism  First  Semester,  AY  2014-­‐15  Instructor:  Maria  Teresa  (Trina)  Tinio  Monday/Thursday,  9:00-­‐10:30,  EB802      Course  Description:  Literary  Criticism  is  the  study,  analysis,  and  evaluation  of  literature.    This  course  proceeds  from  the  assumption  that  literary  texts  are  different  form  ordinary,  everyday  speech  and  from  practical  prose  such  as  scientific,  business,  and  technical  writing,  and  everyday  writing  such  as  letter,  blog,  or  report  writing.  Literature  (novels,  short  stories,  poetry,  literary  essays),  on  the  other  hand,  is  seen  as  a  special  kind  of  writing  that  works  on  its  own  special  aesthetics,  codes,  and  conventions.                It  is  the  unfamiliarity  with  these  special  aesthetics,  codes,  and  conventions  that  make  literature  appear,  to  the  ordinary  reader,  dense  and  distanced  or  deep  and  unknowable.    The  student  of  literature  must  first  understand  these  aesthetics,  codes,  and  conventions  in  order  to  understand  literature.                In  high  school,  the  emphasis  in  the  study  of  literature  has  been  on  the  story,  meaning,  or  theme  of  the  literary  piece  and  on  the  values  imparted.    This  is  what  is  known  as  literature’s  content.    Collegiate  study  of  literary  must  emphasize  a  more  complete  and  deeper  analysis  by  involving  these  aesthetics,  codes,  and  conventions.    This  is  what  is  known  as  literature’s  form.    The  evaluation  or  critique  of  literature  then  applies  not  only  to  the  content  of  literature  but  to  the  form  as  well.                The  teaching  of  high  school  literature  also  emphasized  understanding  the  moral  values  conveyed  by  the  literary  text.    Literature,  however,  especially  contemporary  literature,  is  very  rarely  written  with  the  objective  of  conveying  a  direct,  didactic  and  moral  point.    A  disjunct  then  exists  between  how  literature  is  often  studied  (extracting  a  moral)  and  the  actual  conventions  of  literature  (literature  as  an  expression  of  lived  experience).    The  collegiate  approach  to  literature  has  to  focus  instead  on  an  understanding  about  what  each  literary  piece  conveys  about  the  actual  values  (materialism,  patriarchal  values,  modernism,  technology  and  efficiency,  etc.)  or  the  interplay  and  negotiation  of  conflicting  values  and  practices  (global  v.  local,    modern  v.  traditional).            This  course  is  a  practical  course  where  students  will  be  expected  to  write  critiques  of  contemporary  literature.    Whereas  most  other  courses  entitled  Literary  Criticism  take  a  historical  approach  and  study  writers  of  the  past  who  have  tried  to  theorize  on  the  aesthetics  of  literature  (Aristotle,  Alexander  Pope,  T.S.  Eliot,  etc.),  this  course  focus  on  getting  students  to  write  complete  and  comprehensive  literary  critiques  that  first  provides  a  precise  and  concise  summary,  second  a  thoughtful  appreciation  of  the  methods  employed  by  the  author,  and  third  conveys  an  opinion  on  the  value  of  the  work.    

Course  Objectives:  At  the  end  of  the  course,  the  student  is  expected  to:  

1.  appreciate  why  it  is  important  to  understand  and  teach  literature  2.  better  understand  the  aesthetics,  codes  and  conventions  of  literature  3.  write  precise  but  concise  summaries  of  literary  works  4.  identify  and  explain  the  literary  techniques  used  by  the  author  5.  express  one’s  opinion  on  the  value  of  the  literary  work  based  on  what  it  conveys  about  actual  

and/or  conflicting  values        

Page 2: Literary Criticism Syllabus 2014-15

Required  Readings/Texts:     A  selection  of  short  stories,  essays,  and  poems  (listed  in  the  course  outline  below)  that  will  be  uploaded  to  the  course  website  for  download  by  the  students.     Great  Expectations  by  Charles  Dickens.    The  Simon  and  Schuster  Enrich  Classic  edition  is  recommended.     Attendance  at  two  FEU  Theater  Guild  productions:  Urbana  at  Feliza,  (Sept.  12,  13,  15,16)  and  Makikitawag  Lang  Ako  (no  date  yet  but  sometime  in  October)  

   Monday/Thursday  

WEEK   READING/OBJECT  OF  STUDY  

STRATEGIES   EVALUATIVE  MEASURES  

1        2  

June  30  and  July3  

Introduction  to  Literature  and  Literary  Criticism  “First  Lesson,”  Philip  Booth    

Discussion  Personal  Narratives:        -­‐  What  I  read;  why  I  read;  How  I  read.  

     

3  July  7  and  

10  

“Iguana  Hunting,”  Hernan  Lara  Zavala    Glossary  of  Literary  Terms  

Discussion  Personal  Narratives:    -­‐  Summers  in  the  Countryside    Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐plot;  foil;  initiation  story;  bildugsroman  

Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique  

4  July  14  and  17  

“The  Happiest  Boy  in  the  World,”  N.V.M.  Gonzalez  

Discussion  Personal  Narratives:    -­‐  Unbeknownst  to  Me  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐subtext,  dramatic  irony,  social  commentary  

Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique    Quiz  for  Great  Expectations,  Chapters  1-­‐10  

5  July  21  and  24  

“Homage  to  Isaac  Babel,”  Doris  Lessing  

Discussion  Personal  Narratives:    -­‐  On  Hindsight  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐charcterization  

Quiz  for  “Homage  to  Isaac  Babel”  Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique  

6  July  29  and  31  PRELIMS  

“The  Chieftest  Mourner,  “  Aida  Rivera-­‐Ford  

Discussion  Personal  Narratives:    -­‐  Studied  Disregard  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐subtext;  oxymoron;  foil;  point-­‐

Quiz  on  “The  Chieftest  Mourner”  Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique  

Page 3: Literary Criticism Syllabus 2014-15

of-­‐view;  social  commentary   Prelims:  Full  Paper  on  any  of  the  four  stories  previously  discussed  

7  Aug.  4  and  

7  

“The  Unfinished  Story,”  Joy  Dayrit  

Discussion  Personal  Narratives:    -­‐  The  Country  and  the  City  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐subtext;  foil;  verbal  irony;  social  commentary  

Quiz  on  “The  Unfinished  Story”  Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique  

8    Aug.  11  and  14  

“Looking  for  a  Rain  God,”  Bessie  Head  

Discussion  Personal  Narratives:    -­‐  Abject  Poverty  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐plot;  creating  sympathy;  social  commentary  

Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique    Quiz  on  Great  Expectations,  Chapters  11-­‐19  

9  Aug.19    21  

(HOLIDAY)  

“The  Chaser,”  John  Collier  

Discussion  Collective  Writing  

 

10  Aug.  25  

(HOLIDAY)    28    

  Collective  Writing   Quiz  on  Great  Expectations,  Chapters  20-­‐29  

11  Sept.  1  and  4  

“The  Grasshopper  and  the  Bell  Cricket,”  Yasunuri  Kawabata  

Discussion  Personal  Narratives:    -­‐  My  Story  Through  a  Stranger’s  Story  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐Point-­‐of-­‐view;  imagery;  “plotlessness”    

Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique    

12  Sept.  8    and  11  

MIDTERM  

Urbana  at  Feliza,  (Theater  Guild  Production,  Sept.  12,  13,  15,16)  

Discussion  Collective  Writing  

Midterm  Paper:Full  Critique  of  “A  Family  Supper”  by  Kazuo  Ishiguro  

Page 4: Literary Criticism Syllabus 2014-15

13  Sept.  15  and  18  

 

The  Grammar  and  Syntax  of  Poetry  Two  Sonnets  by  Edna  St.  Vincent  Millay  Two  Sonnets  by  William  Shakespeare  

Discussion  Exercise  in  Paraphrasing  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐Imagery,  tension  and  balance  

Quiz  on  Great  Expectations,  Chapters  30-­‐39  

14  Sept.  22  and  25  

“Soledad”  and  “I  Have  Begrudged  the  Years”  by  Angela  Manalang  Gloria  

Personal  Narratives:    -­‐  Heaven  in  the  Depths  of  Hell  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐Paradox;  poetic  diction  

Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique    

15  Sept.  29  and  Oct.  2  

“Sow”  by  Sylvia  Plath  “Spring  and  Fall:  to  a  Young  Child,”  Gerard  Manely  Hopkins    “Makikitawag  Lang  Ako”  (Theater  Guild  Production,  Oct.  2)  

Personal  Narratives:  -­‐Smaller  as  I  get  Older  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐imagery;  poetic  diction      

Quiz  on  “Sow”      Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique    Quiz  on  Great  Expectations,  Chapters  40-­‐49  

16  Oct.  6  and  

9  

“Demeter,”  Carol  Ann  Duffy;  “Persephone,  Falling,”  Rita  Dove;  “Ruth  was  not  Penelope,  Myrna  Peña  Reyes;  “Zero  Gravity,  “  Eric  Gamalinda  

Personal  Narratives:  -­‐A  Moment  of  Infinite  Possibilities  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐allusion  

Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique    

17  Oct.  13  and  16  

Great  Expectations,  Charles  Dickens  

Great  Expectations:  The  novel,  the  hero,  the  anti-­‐hero,  “dickensian”  characterization  

Quiz  on  Great  Expectations,  Chapters  50-­‐59  

18  Oct.  20  and  23  

“My  Last  Duchess,”  Robert  Browning  “Departmental,”  Robert  Frost  

Personal  Narratives:  -­‐Experiences  of  Overstatement  and  Understatement  Using  the  Elements  in  a  Critique:  -­‐understatement  

Recitation:  Personal  Narrative  Sharing  Prepared  Summary  and  Literary  Critique    

19  Oct.  27  and  30  FINALS  

“A  Valediction:  Forbidding  Mourning,”  John  Donne  

  Final  Paper:  Critique  of  either  Urbana  at  Feliza  or  Makikitawag  Lang  Ako  

 

 

Page 5: Literary Criticism Syllabus 2014-15

Requirements:  

1. Attendance  at  Class  2. Reading  of  assigned  texts  3. Participation  in  class  discussion  4. Quizzes  (at  least  3  per  grading  period),  10  points,  open  reading  and  open  notes  5. Personal  Narrative  Sharing,  10  points  each  6. Attendance  at  FEU  Theater  Guild  Productions:  Urbana  at  Feliza  and  Makikitawag  Lang  Ako  7. Three  Critical  Analysis  Papers  of  between  500-­‐600  words  each    

 

Stipulations  for  Requirements:  

  Attendance.    The  CHED  rule  on  the  requirement  of  at  least  80%  of  class  will  be  strictly  followed.    This  means  that  students  are  allowed  only  up  to  six  (6)  absences  and  will  be  dropped  from  the  course  at  the  seventh  (7th)  absence.    Attendance  is  called  at  the  start  of  class  and  students  who  are  late  are  considered  absent.    There  are  no  excused  absences;  illness  or  family  emergencies  does  not  excuse  one  from  class.  

Punctuality  of  Submission  of  Requirements.    Quizzes  are  given  at  the  start  of  class.    Students  who  arrive  after  the  quiz  has  been  given  will  not  be  given  a  make-­‐up  quiz.    Papers  are  due  on  the  date  designated  in  the  syllabus  and  announced  in  class.    Papers  must  be  submitted  in  MS-­‐Word  format  via  email  no  later  than  12  midnight  of  the  designated  date.    Late  papers  will  not  be  accepted  and  a  zero  will  be  recorded  for  the  missed  requirement.  

Paper  Format.    The  following  information  must  be  included  in  the  top  left-­‐hand  corner  of  the  paper:  name  of  student,  Course  Title  and  Instructor’s  Name,  Identification  of  Requirement  (e.g.  First  Preliminary  Paper).    The  top  right-­‐hand  corner  of  the  paper  must  indicate  the  due  date  which  is  also  the  date  of  submission.    Papers  should  be  written  on  short  bond  paper;  they  should  be  double-­‐spaced,  with  normal  margins  and  font  size  11  or  12.    The  word  count  on  the  paper  should  be  indicated  at  the  very  end  of  the  paper  (e.g.  Word  Count:  543).    

Academic  Integrity.  The  rules  on  academic  integrity  will  be  strictly  followed  in  this  class.    The  copying,  in  part  or  in  whole  of  work  that  is  not  one’s  own,  without  acknowledgement,  will  cause  the  student  to  get  a  zero  for  the  requirement.    The  instructor  may  opt  to  report  the  student  to  the  Discipline  Office  for  the  offense.    Cheating  at  quizzes  through  copying  of  a  classmate’s  work  will  also  be  considered  a  violation  of  the  policy  on  academic  integrity.    

  Conduct  During  Class.    Students  are  expected  to  conduct  themselves  professionally  during  class.    Participation  at  class  discussions  is  essential.  

Consultation  Hours:    By  appointment,  Monday-­‐Friday,  10:30-­‐6:00,  first  floor,  Office  of  Academic  Affairs,  Administration  Building  

 

Page 6: Literary Criticism Syllabus 2014-15

APPROX.  DATE  

PERSONAL  NARRATIVE   ASSIGNMENTS   MINI  CRITIQUE   ASSIGNEMENTS  

July  7-­‐10   Summers  in  the  Countryside     “Iguana  Hunting”  Elements:  plot;  foil;  initiation  story;  bildugsroman  

 

July  14-­‐17   Unbeknownst  to  Me     “Happiest  Boy  in  the  World”  subtext,  dramatic  irony,  social  commentary  

 

July  21-­‐24   In  Hindsight     “Homage  to  Isaac  Babel”  Elements:  characterization,  subtext  

 

July  20-­‐31   Studied  Disregard     “The  Chieftest  Mourner”  Elements:  subtext;  oxymoron;  foil;  point-­‐of-­‐view;  social  commentary  

 

Aug.  4-­‐7   The  Country  and  the  City     “The  Unfinished  Story,”    Elements:  subtext;  foil;  verbal  irony;  social  commentary  

 

Aug.  11-­‐14  

Abject  Poverty    

  “Looking  for  a  Rain  God”  Elements:  plot;  creating  sympathy;  social  commentary  

 

Sept.  1-­‐4   My  Story  Through  a  Stranger’s  Story  

  “The  Grasshopper  and  the  Bell  Cricket”  Elements:  Point-­‐of-­‐view;  imagery;  “plotlessness”  

 

Sept.  22-­‐25  

Heaven  in  the  Depths  of  Hell    

  “Soledad”  and  “I  Have  Begrudged  the  Years”  Elements:  Paradox;  poetic  diction  

 

Sept.  29-­‐Oct.  2  

Smaller  as  I  get  Older    

  “Sow”  and  “Spring  and  Fall:  To  a  Young  Child”  Elements:  imagery;  poetic  diction  

 

Oct.  6-­‐9   A  Moment  of  Infinite  Possibilities    

  “Demeter,”  “Persephone,  Falling,”  “Ruth  was  Not  Penelope,”  “Zero  Gravity”  Elements:  allusion  

 

Oct.  20-­‐23  

Experiences  of  Overstatement  and  Understatement  

  “My  Last  Duchess”  and  “Departmental”    Elements:  understatement,  irony,  subtext