literature review messent et al (1998,1999) robertson et al (2000) beart et al (2001) heller et al...

19

Upload: roderick-bates

Post on 12-Jan-2016

228 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)
Page 2: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)
Page 3: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)
Page 4: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)
Page 5: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)
Page 6: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

Literature Review

• Messent et al (1998,1999)

• Robertson et al (2000)

• Beart et al (2001)

• Heller et al (2002)

Page 7: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

Barriers

• Resources e.g. staff support

• Policy/priorities

• Opportunities

• Transport/finance/access

Page 8: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

Method

• Subjects. 45 adults(m27/f18) 24-49yrs

• Settings. 2xDay centres(35) 6 Houses (10)

• Design. Interview /ethnographic based

• Procedure. 12mths Multi/site/off road/key access

• Analysis. Transcript (78) Thematic content

Page 9: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

Barriers to cycling

‘all about support and staff initiative. That has been the same before and after this intervention’

Findings

Page 10: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

Staff Interface:

‘they tend to do the minimum and only one or two drive things through’

Staff support :

‘Not enough staff to cope with ever bodies wants and needs. Cant keep them all happy’ (TV3)

Page 11: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

Opportunity for activity

‘We need more activity choice and variation. We downgrade the activities to fit the circumstances’ (RV2; TV6)

‘it is difficult to keep them on task and motivated’

‘There is an awful lot of sitting about for people with learning difficulties’.

Page 12: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

 ‘If we had more bikes we could get more cycling. It’s brilliant’. (AdH2).

Opportunity for activity-cycling

‘Options have been enriched, and provided an extra activity’

‘it is an activity that involves real participation, and ‘ it is just what we are looking for’. (RV2, RV4, TV 1),

Page 13: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

1) Accommodating impairments

‘it is comfortable and secure’

‘Cycling is so simple and a most basic thing can do’

‘builds teamwork, develops relationships and gives independence’

‘motivation is a biggy’.

‘Fun’.+++

Page 14: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

2. Offering Accessibility and Flexibility

Impact on staff support

‘It is the flexibility. Even if you are short of staff you can still find time to take them out’, (LW2; RV4)

Impact on the interface

‘was more motivating for us and them’ It gets us and them out of a rut’,

Page 15: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

Cycle use

Day centre 1. 1-3 weekly @ 30min plus a session (*Max 6 hours)

Day centre 2. 1 session week @ 20 –30 min

Housing network. Average one per month (* 5 x week)

Page 16: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)

Conclusions

Meets Need

Offers opportunities

Breaks Barriers

FUN +++

Page 17: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)
Page 19: Literature Review Messent et al (1998,1999) Robertson et al (2000) Beart et al (2001) Heller et al (2002)