literature review workshop - university of nevada, las vegas · 2019-12-21 · 1. think about how...
TRANSCRIPT
Writing a Literature Review for
Engineers Sue Wainscott STEM Librarian, UNLV Libraries
Julie Longo Technical Communications, Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering
Contents
HOW TO CONDUCT A QUALITY LITERATURE SEARCH
Purpose of a literature review
Getting started
Search strategies
Keeping up to date
Organizing your material
Reading and evaluating your material
When are you finished with your literature search?
HOW TO WRITE A LITERATURE REVIEW
Refresher: How to read a paper critically
Levels of writing a literature review
How to organize your material before writing
Writing a Level I literature review: biblographic annotation
Writing a Level 2 literature review: contrast and compare
Writing a Level 3: integration and synthesis
These workshops count towards the Graduate College
Research Certificate Program.
You may want to apply for this program.
Introductions
• Please introduce yourself to the group, including:
• Your name
• Your department
Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/29792566@N08/6140852961
Brainstorming!
When you hear
the phrase
“literature
review” what
words come to
mind?
Any & all!
Good, bad,
indifferent…
Type your answers here:
http://padlet.com/sue_wainscott/litrev
Image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brainstorming.png http://padlet.com/sue_wainscott/litrev
Purpose of a Literature (Lit.) Review
• Demonstrate your knowledge
• Explain how your research fits into the
context of what is already known
• Determine if your research idea is new
and interesting
• Give credit to and summarize the work
of the other researchers who have
written about the topic
Image from https://pixabay.com/en/question-mark-question-response-1019820/
Getting Started with Your Lit. Review
• What is the main purpose of
this literature review?
• Who is your target audience?
• What will the final product be?
• Thesis or dissertation
• Journal article
• Grant proposal
• Technical report
Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/stevegarfield/14922664313
Small Group Activity! Image from: https://pixabay.com/en/exchange-of-ideas-debate-discussion-222788/
Activity: Strategies for Lit. Reviews
1. Think about how you have approached a
literature review (with a written product) in the
past.
2. Share with your group some of the strategies you
think work best to accomplish one of the below
tasks:
• search for information resources
• evaluate those resources
• take notes on what you read
• organize the notes and resources you read
1. Think about how you have approached a literature
review (with a written product) in the past.
2. Share with your group some of the strategies you think
work best to accomplish one of the below tasks:
3. As a group, choose one spokesperson.
4. Share ideas with the whole room.
• search for information resources
• evaluate those resources
• take notes on what you read
• organize the notes and resources you read
Activity: Strategies for Lit. Reviews
http://padlet.com/sue_wainscott/litrev1
Search in order to tell a Story
Who?
What?
When?
Where?
Why?
How?
Image from: https://pixabay.com/en/newspaper-news-journal-headline-152320/
A good newspaper article story answers:
Search in order to tell a Story
Who?
What? When?
Where?
Why?
How?
A good literature review (story) ALSO answers:
Useful words for a
Keyword Search
Search Strategies
• Keywords
• AND, OR, NOT, *, and “”
• Author searching
• Look for review articles
• Subject Headings, linked keyword lists
• Footnote chasing / using bibliographies
• Citation tracking (Web of Science & Scopus)
• Keep track of where you’ve looked, what keywords you used.
Image from: https://pixabay.com/en/sherlock-holmes-detective-462978/
Where you Look is Important
• What is a database?
• Advantages of using multiple databases?
• Subject specific
• Multi-disciplinary
• Search in multiple databases
• Discovery Tools :
• UNLV Libraries Quick Search
• Google Scholar
More than journal articles
Other Sources • Conference papers and proceedings
• Standards manuals / handbooks (current and older)
• Chemical and materials property data sources
• Government agency technical reports
• Professional association magazine articles
• Company and trade association white papers
• Patent applications and patent documents
• Data sets
Keeping Up To Date
• Search alerts in
databases
• Table of Contents (TOC)
alerts
• RSS Feeds for journal
and other webpages
Image from: https://pixabay.com/en/alarm-clock-clock-time-minute-hour-590383/
Organizing
• RefWorks
• Mendeley
• Zotero
• EndNote
• 3x5 cards
• BibTeX
Image from:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Don%27t_kill_your_reputation%2C_organize_your_information_-_NARA_-_518156.jpg
When is it time to stop searching?
• Recurring authors
• Recurring institutions, labs
• Recurring settings for experiments/measurements
• Recurring methods or results
Patterns that let you know
you are done with your
search
Law of diminishing returns
Materials found are too
old
(OR you run out of time…) Image from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Newport_Hill_Climb_finish_line.png
Sue Wainscott
702-895-2262
UNLV Libraries home page
(http://library.unlv.edu)
Image from: https://www.flickr.com/photos/travelinlibrarian/223839049
HOW TO WRITE A LITERATURE REVIEW
Refresher: How to Read a Paper Critically
Levels of writing a literature review
How to organize your material before writing
Writing a Level I literature review: bibliographic
annotation
Writing a Level 2 literature review: compare and
contrast
Writing a Level 3 literature review: Integration and
synthesis
How to Read a Paper Critically
Scan:
Title, abstract,
figures, and tables
Read the introduction to get a sense of the study’s
goals.
Quickly read through the
methodology and results.
Do you agree with the results?
Do you have questions?
If this paper looks
promising, do a thorough
read.
This means you must question everything!!!
How to Read a Paper Critically
A THOROUGH READ OF A PAPER MEANS ARMING YOURSELF WITH:
Post-it notes
Highlighter
Ruler
Any other tools to make sure you gain understanding of the subject (website links, thesaurus, etc.)
This assumes you will read hard copy, not online
Having a favorite chair and favorite drink (coffee, hot chocolate, soda) often helps this process!
The point is: you are reading, challenging, and dialoguing with the authors!
http://lakerlutznews.com/lln/?p=18684
How to Read a Paper Critically
A classic:
How to Read a Book
Adler and van Doren ISBN-13: 004-2516291251
ISBN-10: 0671212095
Level I: Basic Assessment
Tabulate
Select
Find the patterns
Categorize (subheads)
Describe
This is also known as a bibliographic annotation.
This level is author-centric.
Levels of Writing a Literature Review
Level I: Basic Assessment
Level I: Basic Assessment
Tabulate
Select
Find the patterns
Categorize (subheads)
Describe
Level I: Basic Assessment
Author / Date Title Description
Pautasso, M. / 2013 Ten Simple Rules for Writing a
Literature Review
• Most researchers in the sciences do not plan how to write a literature
review
• Graphically describes the types of literature reviews
• States 10 rules in writing a good literature review.
Taylor-Powell, E.
and Renner, M. /
2003
Analyzing Qualitative Data
• Qualitative Analysis or Content Analysis -- another name for
Literature Review?
• Includes papers, video, photos, other forms of data.
• Five steps: know your data, understand what you want to analyze,
organize your data, find the pattern among data sets, synthesize and
interpret.
Webster, J and
Watson, JT / 2002
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for
the Future: Writing a Literature
Review
• The need for a ‘plot’ or theme
• Emphasis on how to conduct a “complete” search
• Two types of literature reviews: one centers on concepts (synthesis)
and the other centers on authors
• Find the patterns and address the knowledge gaps
• Evaluate your own assessment to see if it is solid
Torraco, RJ / 2005
Writing Integrative Literature
Reviews: Guidelines and
Examples
• “Integrative literature reviews...generate new knowledge about the
topic reviewed.”
• Reviews, synthesizes, and integrates material
• Organize ideas around topics with a rich source of literature; address
the gaps for emerging topics.
• What is the contribution of the literature review? What is the point or
the need?
• Concept structuring and traditional step in writing a literature review
• What sets an integrative LR apart: critical thinking and advanced
synthesis
Level I: Basic Assessment
Tabulate
Select
− What do you want your paper to accomplish?
− What is the focus of your study?
− Find the literature that most closely pertains to your study and use those.
− Work with your faculty advisor
In my literature review, I want to define the three levels of writing a literature review.
Level I: Basic Assessment
Level I: Basic Assessment
Level I: Basic Assessment
Tabulate
Select
Find the patterns
Categorize (subheads)
Describe
Level I: Basic Assessment
Author / Date Title Description
Pautasso, M. / 2013
Ten Simple Rules for
Writing a Literature
Review
• Most researchers in the sciences do not plan how to write a literature review
• Graphically describes the types of literature reviews
• States 10 rules in writing a good literature review.
Taylor-Powell, E.
and Renner, M. /
2003
Analyzing Qualitative
Data
• Qualitative Analysis or Content Analysis -- another name for Literature
Review?
• Includes papers, video, photos, other forms of data.
• Five steps: know your data, understand what you want to analyze, organize
your data, find the pattern among data sets, synthesize and interpret.
Webster, J and
Watson, JT / 2002
Analyzing the Past to
Prepare for the Future:
Writing a Literature
Review
• The need for a ‘plot’ or theme
• Emphasis on how to conduct a “complete” search
• Two types of literature reviews: one centers on concepts (synthesis) and the
other centers on authors
• Find the patterns and address the knowledge gaps
• Evaluate your own assessment to see if it is solid
Torraco, RJ / 2005
Writing Integrative
Literature Reviews:
Guidelines and Examples
• “Integrative literature reviews...generate new knowledge about the topic
reviewed.”
• Reviews, synthesizes, and integrates material
• Organize ideas around topics with a rich source of literature; address the gaps
for emerging topics.
• What is the contribution of the literature review? What is the point or the
need?
• Concept structuring and traditional step in writing a literature review
• What sets an integrative LR apart: critical thinking and advanced synthesis
Level I: Basic Assessment
Author / Date Title Description
Pautasso, M. / 2013
Ten Simple Rules for
Writing a Literature
Review
• Most researchers in the sciences do not plan how to write a literature review
• Graphically describes the types of literature reviews to identify what kind of
review to write
• States 10 rules in writing a good literature review.
Taylor-Powell, E.
and Renner, M. /
2003
Analyzing Qualitative
Data
• Qualitative Analysis or Content Analysis -- another name for Literature
Review?
• Includes papers, video, photos, other forms of data.
• Five steps: know your data, understand what you want to analyze, organize
your data, find the pattern among data sets, synthesize and interpret.
Webster, J and
Watson, JT / 2002
Analyzing the Past to
Prepare for the Future:
Writing a Literature
Review
• The need for a ‘plot’ or theme
• Emphasis on how to conduct a “complete” search
• Two types of literature reviews: one centers on concepts (synthesis) and the
other centers on authors
• Find the patterns and address the knowledge gaps
• Evaluate your own assessment to see if it is solid
Torraco, RJ / 2005
Writing Integrative
Literature Reviews:
Guidelines and Examples
• “Integrative literature reviews...generate new knowledge about the topic
reviewed.”
• Reviews, synthesizes, and integrates material
• Organize ideas around topics with a rich source of literature; address the gaps
for emerging topics.
• What is the contribution of the literature review? What is the point or the
need?
• Concept structuring and traditional step in writing a literature review
• What sets an integrative LR apart: critical thinking and advanced synthesis
Level I: Basic Assessment
Tabulate
Select
Find the patterns
Categorize (subheads)
Describe
₋ In your own words or
₋ Quoted appropriately
Level I: Basic Assessment
Taylor-Powell, E. and Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing qualitative data. Madison, WI:
University of Wisconsin Extension. Retrieved from
http://learningstore.uwex.edu/pdf/G3658-12.pdf
Taylor-Powell and Renner (2003) discussed a systematic approach to organize and
describe qualitative information, in other words, information that is not in numerical
format. This includes describing the literature regarding a specific topic, results of written
answers in surveys, issues discussed in forums, and anecdotal material, and more. The
material could be written, spoken, or in video, photos, or other forms of media.
These authors emphasize identifying the patterns and organizing the data in categories, an
undertaking that the authors point out is “fairly labor intensive depending on the amount
of data you have” (Taylor-Powell and Renner, 2003), and crucial to the total effort. Once
the categories are established, they state the next step is to find the patterns existing
among the categories. This is the starting point in finding a way to synthesize the material
into a coherent literature review.
Example of a Level 1 literature review (author-centric)
Taylor-Powell, E. and
Renner, M. / 2003
Analyzing
Qualitative Data
• Qualitative Analysis or Content Analysis -- another name for Literature Review?
• Includes papers, video, photos, other forms of data.
• Five steps: know your data, understand what you want to analyze, organize your data, find
the pattern among data sets, synthesize and interpret.
Exercise:
Each using their own literature search material, create a
table of three of the papers with Names of Authors,
Title of Paper, and three to five key bullet points for
each paper.
We will give you about 10 minutes to do this.
When you are finished, have another person review
your table and give feedback.
Level I: Basic Assessment
Level 1: Basic Assessment
Not really considered a true literature review
Also known as:
₋ Author-centric literature review
₋ Bibliographic Annotation
₋ This is the level we expect from undergraduates.
We want to move you from Level 1 to Level 2, which is where graduate students should be.
Post-docs and Faculty should be able to write a literature review at Level 3.
Level I: Basic Assessment
Cayla Buttram, David MacMillan III, & Dr. R.T. Koch, Jr. Updated November 2012. University of North Alabama,
Center for Writing Excellence.
http://www.una.edu/writingcenter/docs/Writing-Resources/Comparing%20the%20Annotated%20Bibliography%20to%20the%20Literature%20Review.pdf
Level I: Basic Assessment
Level 2: Compare: Compare and Contrast
Tabulate
Select
− What do you want your paper to accomplish?
− What is the focus of your study?
− Find the literature that most closely pertains to your study and
use those.
− Work with your faculty advisor
Find the patterns
Categorize
Compare and Contrast
Level 2: Compare and Contrast
Level 2: Compare: Contrast or Collate
This is what the literature calls ‘synthesis’ at the most
basic level
You are trying to find the authors that are in agreement
with each other on a conclusion (collate) or disagree
(contrast) on a specific concept
This what Webster and Watson (2002) were talking
about when they distinguished a literature review that
is ‘author-centric’ versus ‘concept-centric’
Level 2: Compare and Contrast
Level 2: Compare and Contrast
Webster, J and Watson, RT (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS
Quarterly. 26:2 pp xiii-xxii. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2625&context=misq&sei-
redir=1&referer=https%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com%2Fscholar%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3DAnalyzing%2Bthe%2Bpast%2Bto%2Bprepare%2
Bfor%2Bthe%2Bfuture%26btnG%3D%26as_sdt%3D1%252C29%26as_sdtp%3D#search=%22Analyzing%20past%20prepare%20future%22
Level 2: Compare and Contrast
Author / Date Title Description
Pautasso, M. / 2013
Ten Simple Rules for
Writing a Literature
Review
• Most researchers in the sciences do not plan how to write a literature review
• Graphically describes the types of literature reviews to identify what kind of
review to write
• States 10 rules in writing a good literature review.
Taylor-Powell, E.
and Renner, M. /
2003
Analyzing Qualitative
Data
• Qualitative Analysis or Content Analysis -- another name for Literature
Review?
• Includes papers, video, photos, other forms of data.
• Five steps: know your data, understand what you want to analyze, organize
your data, find the pattern among data sets, synthesize and interpret.
Webster, J and
Watson, JT / 2002
Analyzing the Past to
Prepare for the Future:
Writing a Literature
Review
• The need for a ‘plot’ or theme
• Emphasis on how to conduct a “complete” search
• Two types of literature reviews: one centers on concepts (synthesis) and the
other centers on authors
• Find the patterns and address the knowledge gaps
• Evaluate your own assessment to see if it is solid
Torraco, RJ / 2005
Writing Integrative
Literature Reviews:
Guidelines and Examples
• “Integrative literature reviews...generate new knowledge about the topic
reviewed.”
• Reviews, synthesizes, and integrates material
• Organize ideas around topics with a rich source of literature; address the gaps
for emerging topics.
• What is the contribution of the literature review? What is the point or the
need?
• Concept structuring and traditional step in writing a literature review
• What sets an integrative LR apart: critical thinking and advanced synthesis
Level 2: Compare and Contrast
Dawadi S and Ahmad S (2013). Evaluating the impact of demand-side management on water resources under
changing climatic conditions and increasing population. Journal of Environmental Management. 114: 261-275.
Level 3: Integrate / Synthesis
To be able to write at this level, you need to master
Level 1 and Level 2.
You also need to gain sufficient experience and breadth
of knowledge in your field of expertise
Level 3 has a narrative quality
If you have compared and contrasted at Level 2, at
Level 3 you want to discuss why there were contrasting
results in the first place
At this level, you might be offering your opinion on the
quality and accuracy of other researchers’ work
Level 3: Integrate / Synthesis
Level 3: Integrate / Synthesis
Dawadi S and Ahmad S (2013). Evaluating the impact of demand-side management on water resources under
changing climatic conditions and increasing population. Journal of Environmental Management. 114: 261-275.
Observations from Dr. Ladkany:
Literature citations are embedded in all the sections of a
paper except for the abstract and the conclusion, which are
your ideas exclusively.
Recommendation:
As you conduct your literature search for any of your
projects, see if you can identify if the literature review in
each paper was written at Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3.
Level 3: Integrate / Synthesis
Technical Writing Intensive
Next Friday, April 15th
SEB 1243
9 a.m. to 12 noon
Bring your paper, report, dissertation, or thesis to work on. You will have ample opportunity for one-on-one counseling.
To register, sign up before you leave this workshop today
Questions?