litterman asset allocation

Upload: lee-koma

Post on 10-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    1/58

    Quantitative Investing

    Ibbotson Asset Allocation Conference

    Robert Litterman

    March, 2008

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    2/58

    Clearly Articulated Investment Beliefs Should

    Drive Investment Strategy

    Our Investment Beliefs (an example)

    1) There is only one basic source of long run wealth creation, the growth of

    the economy.

    2) In equilibrium the investment portfolios of all individuals should reflect

    that source of wealth. The portfolios would all have weights proportional to

    market capitalizations which would reflect the economys expected future

    productive capacity.

    3) The world is clearly (given, among other indications, the diversity ofportfolios) not in equilibrium.

    4) The market as a whole has shown itself to be subject to extended

    periods of overreaction. Nonetheless, capital markets are competitive, and

    though not entirely efficient, are becoming more efficient over time.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    3/58

    Clearly Articulated Investment Beliefs Should

    Drive Investment Strategy (continued)

    Our Investment Beliefs (an example)

    5) Deviations from equilibrium provide opportunities for some disciplined

    investors with superior skills and information and typically a longer than

    average investment horizon to outperform the market return on a risk

    adjusted basis.

    6 ) The key to superior investment performance is superior fundamental

    research through which we can identify disequilibrium phenomena.

    7) Systematically capturing returns from such phenomena requires rigorousobjective research, state of art risk measurement and portfolio construction,

    efficient trading, and patience.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    4/58

    Risk Is a Scarce Resource

    Risk provides the energy that creates returns

    However, risk also creates the opportunity for losses

    Losses should be limited in a bad scenario

    Thus, risk appetite is limited

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    5/58

    How much pain is too much?

    Imagine a very bad economic scenario:

    Equity markets decline globally by 50%

    This decline reflects extensive defaults and depressed economic

    activity for several years

    In this environment long term investors should be increasing their

    allocation to equity.

    Will the investor be able to?

    How much can an individual afford to lose? (10%, 20%, ?)

    The answer to this question is the most important determinant of long

    term asset allocation.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    6/58

    An Optimal Portfolio

    Maximizes return for a given level of risk

    For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    7/58

    The Mathematics of Risk & Return

    The Utility Function (Expected Return) is Linear

    The Constraint Function (Risk) is Nonlinear

    (And Depends on the Correlation of Returns)

    A

    C

    B

    A = Old Portfolio B = New Investment C = New Portfolio

    A

    C

    B

    correlation = .6

    correlation = .2

    correlation = -.2

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    8/58

    Different Levels of Portfolio Aggregation

    Can Highlight Different Dimensions of Risk

    In understanding the sources of risk and return at times it may be

    useful to focus on:

    Each cash flow

    Individual securities

    However, the most important determinants are:

    Asset class allocations

    Factors driving overall valuations In particular, beta, the exposure to global market returns

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    9/58

    When Is a Portfolio Optimal?

    A portfolio is optimal when, at the margin the following ratio is

    identical for each asset or other investment activity:

    Change in Expected Excess Return

    Change in Portfolio Risk

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    10/58

    Why Should This Be True?

    If not, the fund can be improved:

    Take funds from the lowest (per unit of contribution to portfolio

    risk) returning activity

    Move funds into a higher returning activity

    Adjust cash to keep portfolio risk constant

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    11/58

    Focus on the Risk / Return Frontier

    PortfolioExpec

    tedR

    eturn

    Portfolio RiskFor illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    12/58

    The Bottom Line

    Ultimately there is a risk budget

    Every decision depends on:

    Expected excess return

    And the marginal impact on portfolio risk

    Efficient allocations require this ratio to be the same at every

    margin

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    13/58

    Quantitative Models Measure Marginal

    Contribution to Risk

    The marginal contribution to risk of each asset

    Depends on:

    The covariance of that asset with every other asset

    The amounts invested in each asset

    Can be calculated given:

    Portfolio holdings

    Volatilities and correlations

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    14/58

    The Marginal Risk Contribution Determines

    Implied Views

    If a portfolio is optimal, the implied expected excess returns must

    be proportional to the marginal contribution to portfolio risk

    We refer to these expected excess returns for which the portfolio is

    optimal as the implied views of the portfolio

    We call this a risk based approach to asset allocation because

    risk is measurable and risk measurement implies a set of views for

    which any portfolio is optimal.

    Are those implied views reasonable?

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    15/58

    Implied Views Guide Behavior

    If these implied views conform with current expectations

    Portfolio structure is appropriate

    Otherwise

    Adjustments should be made to increase expected portfolioreturn

    Consider increasing investments in assets with expected

    returns above the implied views; decreasing those below

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    16/58

    Equilibrium Theory providesa neutral starting point for Expected Returns

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    17/58

    Modern Investment ManagementAn Equilibrium Approach

    Institutional investors are adjusting to an environment of low interest rates and reduced expected returns from

    equities. What does the equilibrium theory suggest?

    A book by Bob Litterman and 22 Goldman Sachs

    Asset Management investment professionals

    A re-examination of investment strategy with a focus on alpha vs. beta

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    18/58

    Sources of Total Return in a $1 Million Portfolio:

    There are Three Fundamental

    Sources Of Portfolio Return

    1 Real Risk Free Rate

    Risk free rate = 4.5%

    $ 45,000

    2 Market Risk Premium

    20% Equity Allocation

    0.82% ER

    3.6% Vol

    70% Equity Allocation

    2.58% ER

    9.6% Vol

    3 Active Manager Return

    100% Indexed

    0.0% ER

    1.5% Tracking Error

    at IR = 0.5

    Beta

    Alpha

    $ 8189 $ 25,779

    $ 0 $ 7500

    For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    19/58

    And Three Sources of Portfolio Risk

    Interest rate risk, usually from liabilities:

    Uncompensated risk

    Can be hedged via derivatives or bonds

    Market risk:

    Basically available for free (no fees)

    Has relatively low expected return per unit of risk

    Active risk:

    Uncorrelated risk implies low impact on portfolio risk

    Skill-based

    Opportunities require deviations from equilibrium

    Active management fees

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    20/58

    Which Risks Should Be Compensated?

    An answer was provided by the capital asset pricing model: an

    equilibrium model

    When all investors maximize expected return subject to a risk

    constraint and markets are efficient

    Expected excess return (the equilibrium risk premium) is

    proportional to the beta of an asset

    Why?

    Beta measures the marginal impact of increasing asset weight

    on the risk of the market portfolio

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    21/58

    Why Focus on Equilibrium?

    The world is not in equilibrium

    The academic theory is nonetheless relevant for investors

    Deviations from equilibrium provide opportunities

    But investors taking advantage of these opportunities push thecapital markets back toward equilibrium and greater efficiency

    So the equilibrium framework helps investors to identify

    opportunitiesit provides the hurdle rate, the required expected

    return for taking additional risk

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    22/58

    Equilibrium Expected Excess Returns

    There are several versions of Global CAPM Equilibrium

    We focus on a particularly simple one: Fischer Blacks Universal Hedging

    An assumption on risk aversion determines:

    A constant degree of currency hedging A risk premium or excess return on all assets

    Fischers model is calibrated to long run market returns

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    23/58

    Forward Looking Equilibrium Risk Premia Lead to

    Better Behaved Optimal Asset Allocations

    Equilibrium risk premia justify market capitalization portfolio weights

    Asset Class MarketCapitalization

    Equilibrium RiskPremium

    US Equity 23.7% 3.53%

    Non-US Developed Equity 26.3% 3.51%

    Non-China Emerging Equity 4.8% 4.08%

    China Equity 0.9% 4.51%

    Global Fixed Income 42.5% 0.03%

    High Yield 1.7% 1.27%

    Private Equity 0% 4.69%

    Real Estate 0% 2.63%

    Hedge Funds 0% 0.48%

    Market Cap above as of Sept 30th, 2007.All numbers reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategic long-term assumptions aresubject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect future performance. They are

    hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see p68 for a summary of the assumptions.Expected returns are estimates of hypothetical average returns of economic asset classes derived from statistical models. There can beno assurance that these returns can be achieved. Actual returns are likely to vary. Please see additional disclosures.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    24/58

    Current Estimates of Global CAPM

    Equilibrium Risk Premia

    All numbers reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategic long-term assumptions aresubject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect future performance. They are

    hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see p68 for a summary of the assumptions.Expected returns are estimates of hypothetical average returns of economic asset classes derived from statistical models. There can beno assurance that these returns can be achieved. Actual returns are likely to vary. Please see additional disclosures.

    4.50%

    5.00%

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    25/58

    Strategic Asset Allocation providesa long term neutral anchor for

    fund investment policy

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    26/58

    Steps toward a Strategic Asset Allocation

    Specify the liability structure or fund objective: e.g. maximize real

    wealth creation

    Determine a risk tolerance

    Start with global equilibrium risk premia

    Tilt in the direction of long-term views

    Optimize

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    27/58

    The Equity Allocation Drives the Overall Level of Risk

    Market Capitalization Weights Risk Decomposition

    1 The risk decomposition is the contribution of each asset class to the total portfolio variance.All numbers reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategic long-term assumptionsare subject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect future performance. They are

    hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see p68 for a summary of the assumptions.For illustrative purpose only

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    28/58

    Black-Litterman Model combinesMarket Equilibrium with Investor Views

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    29/58

    Incorporating Views In Portfolios

    Step 1. Define What a View Is

    A simple view:

    UST yields will decline 50 bps in six months

    Equivalently the Expected Return UST

    = 3.3%

    If the view is uncertain:

    UST

    = 3.3% + UST

    where

    UST

    = Expected Return

    UST

    = Uncertainty in the Expected Return

    UST N( 0, ) Measures Uncertainty

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    30/58

    A more complicated view:

    Globally bonds will outperform stocks by about 3%

    Equivalently: FI - MSCI = 3.0% +

    Or: (1, -1) * ( FI , MSCI ) = 3.0% +

    In general a view is represented as:

    pv * = q +

    where the weights pv define the view portfolio.

    Incorporating Views In Portfolios

    Step 2. Create a General Representation

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    31/58

    Views Can Reflect Long-Run or Short-Run

    Opportunities

    In forming a Strategic Benchmark, views should reflect long-term

    deviations from equilibrium

    Examples:

    Emerging markets will outperform developed markets

    Infrastructure returns will exceed their beta

    Excess returns to commodities will be positive

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    32/58

    Tactical Views

    In forming a Tactical Asset Allocation, views should reflect short-

    term deviations from equilibrium

    Examples:

    Global stock markets will outperform global bond markets by

    only 2 percent this year (a relatively bearish view on stocks)

    Real estate will underperform US equities by 5 percent this year

    Chinese equities will outperform other emerging markets by 5

    percent this year

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    33/58

    Incorporating Views in Portfolios

    Step 3. The Black-Litterman Model

    Start with neutral expected returns derived from the global CAPM

    equilibrium

    Add a set of views:

    p1 * = q1 + 1 1 N( 0, 1 )

    p2 * = q2 + 2 2 N( 0, 2 )

    p3 * = q3 + 3 3 N( 0, 3 )

    Black-Litterman combines the views with equilibrium and provides

    as output

    BL = Black-Litterman Expected Returns

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    34/58

    An Example: Using the Black-Litterman model

    Asset Class Symbol Volatility Equilibrium RiskPremium

    China Equity C 35.7% 4.51%

    US Equity US 14.5% 3.53%

    Non-US Developed Equity DE 14.3% 3.51%

    Non-China Emerging Equity EE 22.0% 4.08%

    Global Fixed Income GFI 3.0% 0.03%

    High Yield HY 8.4% 1.27%Private Equity PE 20.9% 4.69%

    Real Estate RE 16.0% 2.63%

    Hedge Fund Portfolio HF 3.6% 0.48%

    In this example there are nine assets.

    We start with the equilibrium risk premia -- a set of expected excess returns that are

    for each asset proportional to the beta of that asset with the global market portfolio:

    All numbers reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategic long-term assumptions aresubject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect future performance. They are

    hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see p68 for a summary of the assumptions.Expected returns are estimates of hypothetical average returns of economic asset classes derived from statistical models. There can beno assurance that these returns can be achieved. Actual returns are likely to vary. Please see additional disclosures.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    35/58

    Equilibrium Risk Premia Provide a Reasonable

    Starting Point for Asset Allocation Exercises

    Equilibrium Expected

    Excess Returns

    Optimizer maximizes expected

    return for a given level of risk

    Implies Market

    Capitalization

    Weights

    5%

    6%

    7%

    45%Market Cap above as of Sept 30th, 2007.All numbers reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategic long-term assumptions aresubject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect future performance. They are

    hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see p68 for a summary of the assumptions.Expected returns are estimates of hypothetical average returns of economic asset classes derived from statistical models. There can beno assurance that these returns can be achieved. Actual returns are likely to vary. Please see additional disclosures.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    36/58

    Suppose you have the view described below.

    How would you adjust your expected returns?

    1. Global stock markets will outperform global bond markets by

    only 2 percent this year

    One approach is to make adjustments directly to theexpected excess returns that drive an asset allocation

    exercise.

    Another approach is to use the Black-Litterman Global Asset

    Allocation Model.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    37/58

    The direct adjustment of expected excess returns

    is a complex and often frustrating exercise

    4.5%

    5.0%

    Equilibrium expected returns above reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategiclong-term assumptions are subject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect futureperformance. They are hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see p68 for a summary of the assumptions.

    Expected returns are estimates of hypothetical average returns of economic asset classes derived from statistical models. There can beno assurance that these returns can be achieved. Actual returns are likely to vary. Please see additional disclosures.For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    38/58

    The optimal portfolio does something strange:

    It allocates 10 percent to real estate

    70%

    ?Market Cap above as of Sept 30th, 2007. For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    39/58

    The Black-Litterman Model converts the views into a

    set of consistent expected excess returns

    4.5%

    5.0%

    One not entirely

    obvious implication of

    stocks doing poorly is

    that real estate is

    likely to do less well

    Equilibrium expected returns above reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategiclong-term assumptions are subject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect futureperformance. They are hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see p68 for a summary of the assumptions.

    Expected returns are estimates of hypothetical average returns of economic asset classes derived from statistical models. There can beno assurance that these returns can be achieved. Actual returns are likely to vary. Please see additional disclosures.For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    40/58

    One can also specify higher or lower degrees of

    confidence in a view

    4.5%

    5.0%

    Equilibrium expected returns above reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategiclong-term assumptions are subject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect futureperformance. They are hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see p68 for a summary of the assumptions.Expected returns are estimates of hypothetical average returns of economic asset classes derived from statistical models. There can beno assurance that these returns can be achieved. Actual returns are likely to vary. Please see additional disclosures.For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    41/58

    The Black-Litterman expected excess returns

    lead to a well behaved optimal portfolio

    70%

    Market Cap above as of Sept 30th, 2007. For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    42/58

    In fact, in the simplest context the deviations from

    the market cap portfolio are the view portfolio

    1400%

    The bearish equity view is expressed in the Black-Litterman model as the following equation:

    1.7%*C + 42.6%*US + 47.2% * DE + 8.6% * EE = GFI + 2.0

    For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    43/58

    More generally, the Black-Litterman model

    allocates risk to a combination of view portfolios

    In the absence of:

    A benchmark

    Constraints

    Transactions costsThe optimal portfolio is a linear combination of the market and

    the view portfolios

    PBL

    = 0

    x M + 1x p

    1+

    2x p

    2+

    3x p

    3

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    44/58

    Where is the Value Added?

    In this simplest context the optimal portfolio is intuitive and obvious:

    Tilt away from the market portfolio

    Tilt toward an optimal combination of the view portfolios which we call the OTP,

    or Optimal Tilt Portfolio

    Black-Litterman determines these optimal weights

    The value added also shows up in more complex environments

    When transactions costs matter

    Or when there are constraints

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    45/58

    In more complicated contexts the optimal portfolio

    is not so obvious

    Here we show the optimal portfolio, based on three views, and withand without a constraint on the allocation to Private Equity

    60%When private equity

    is constrained the

    allocations to public

    equity increase

    Market Cap above as of Sept 30th, 2007. For illustrative purposes only.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    46/58

    The Role of Active Management

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    47/58

    Adding Active Risk Can Dramatically Shift the

    Portfolio Frontier Upward

    Note: Simulated performance results do not reflect actual trading and have certain inherent limitations. Please see appendix for further disclosures.

    Adding exposure to active risk can boost long-run expected

    returns without meaningfully increasing fund volatility.

    Sharpe

    Ratio

    improves

    with the

    addition of

    market

    independen

    t return

    ExcessReturn (%)

    Volatility(%)

    SharpeRatio

    Original Portfolio (50% equity) 1.7 8.1

    Additional Market Risk (25% equity) 0.8 3.9

    New Portfolio 2.5 11.8 0.21

    Original Portfolio (50% equity) 1.7 8.1

    1.5% Active Risk (assumed IR = 0.5) .7 1.5

    New Portfolio 2.4 8.2 0.29

    Benefit from Diversification (0.2)

    Benefit from Diversification (1.4)

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    48/58

    Active risk typically makes a very small

    contribution to overall portfolio volatility

    For illustrative purposes only.Simulated performance results do not reflect actual trading and have inherent limitations. Please see additional disclosures.

    12%

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    49/58

    The Active Risk Puzzle:

    Why do funds have such modest expectations?

    Optimal Risk Allocations Reveal Modest IR Expectations

    Volatility = 6.0%

    Volatility = 9.0%

    Source: Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

    0.00%

    1.00%

    2.00%

    3.00%

    4.00%

    5.00%

    6.00%

    7.00%

    8.00%

    9.00%

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

    Aggregate Active Risk Information Ratio

    OptimalAllocationtoA

    ctiveRisk

    Allocations to

    active risk of

    typical funds

    range between

    50 and 200

    basis points

    Possible Explanations:

    Funds may be unsure of their ability to select skilled managers

    Career risk

    Governance restrictions

    Active risk and strategic asset allocation have historically been linked

    For illustrative purposes only.Simulated performance resultsdo not reflect actual tradingand have inherent limitations.Please see additionaldisclosures.

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    50/58

    Alternative investments encompass a diverse range of

    strategies and are a good source of active risk

    Private Equity

    Real Estate

    Hedge Funds

    Commodities

    Overlays such as GTAA (Global Tactical Asset Allocation) and

    Active Currency Management

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    51/58

    What Makes Alternative Investments Attractive?

    Attributes of Alternative Investments include:

    Historically attractive absolute returns versus traditional asset

    classes

    Lower correlations that can provide protection in bear markets

    Therefore may provide excess returns above the equilibrium

    hurdle rate

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    52/58

    Appendix

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    53/58

    Strategic Long-Term AssumptionsRisk and Return characteristics

    All tracking error assumptions reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies estimates for above-average active managers and are basedon a historical study of the results of active management [see Active Risk Budgeting in Action: Evaluating Historical Characteristics ofTraditional Managers by Yoel Lax, Tarun Tyagi, and Kurt Winkelmann (GSAM Strategic Research, October 2003)], which is availableupon request. Expected returns are estimates of hypothetical average returns of economic asset classes derived from statisticalmodels. There can be no assurance that these returns can be achieved. Actual returns are likely to vary. Please see additionaldisclosures. All numbers reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategic long-termassumptions are subject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect future performance.They are hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see additional disclosures.

    Asset Class S i T A i

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    54/58

    All numbers reflect GSAM Global Investment Strategies strategic assumptions as of a certain date. Strategic long-termassumptions are subject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect futureperformance. They are hypothetical indications of a broad range of possible returns. Please see additional disclosures.

    Strategic Long-Term AssumptionsCorrelations

    A di

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    55/58

    Appendix

    The currency market affords investors a substantial degree of leverage. This leverage presents the potential forsubstantial profits but also entails a high degree of risk including the risk that losses may be similarly substantial. Suchtransactions are considered suitable only for investors who are experienced in transactions of that kind. Currencyfluctuations will also affect the value of an investment.

    Emerging markets securities may be less liquid and more volatile and are subject to a number of additional risks,including but not limited to currency fluctuations and political instability.

    High-yield, lower-rated securities involve greater price volatility and present greater credit risks than higher-rated fixedincome securities.

    An investment in real estate securities is subject to greater price volatility and the special risks associated with directownership of real estate.

    The portfolio risk management process includes an effort to monitor and manage risk, but does not imply low risk.

    Indices are unmanaged. The figures for the index reflect the reinvestment of dividends but do not reflect the deduction of

    any fees or expenses which would reduce returns. Investors cannot invest directly in indices.

    References to indices, benchmarks or other measures of relative market performance over a specified period of time areprovided for your information only and do not imply that the portfolio will achieve similar results. The index compositionmay not reflect the manner in which a portfolio is constructed. While an adviser seeks to design a portfolio which reflectsappropriate risk and return features, portfolio characteristics may deviate from those of the benchmark.

    A di

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    56/58

    Appendix

    There may be conflicts of interest relating to the Alternative Investment and its service providers, including Goldman Sachsand its affiliates, who are engaged in businesses and have interests other than that of managing, distributing and otherwiseproviding services to the Alternative Investment. These activities and interests include potential multiple advisory,transactional and financial and other interests in securities and instruments that may be purchased or sold by theAlternative Investment, or in other investment vehicles that may purchase or sell such securities and instruments. Theseare considerations of which investors in the Alternative Investment should be aware. Additional information relating tothese conflicts is set forth in the offering materials for the Alternative Investment.

    Past performance is not indicative of future results, which may vary. The value of investments and the income derived frominvestments can go down as well as up. Future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of principal may occur.

    Effect of Fees

    The following table provides a simplified example of the effect of management fees on portfolio returns. Assume a portfoliohas a steady investment return, gross of fees, of 0.5% per month and total management fees of 0.05% per month of themarket value of the portfolio on the last day of the month. Management fees are deducted from the market value of the

    portfolio on that day. There are no cash flows during the period. The table shows that, assuming all other factors remainconstant, the difference increases due to the compounding effect over time. Of course, the magnitude of the differencebetween gross-of-fee and net-of-fee returns will depend on a variety of factors, and this example is purposely simplified.

    Gross NetPeriod Return Return Differential1 year 6.17% 5.54% 0.63%2 years 12.72 11.38 1.3410 years 81.94 71.39 10.55

    A di

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    57/58

    Appendix

    Alternative Investments such as hedge funds are subject to less regulation than other types of pooled investmentvehicles such as mutual funds, may make speculative investments, may be illiquid and can involve a significant useof leverage, making them substantially riskier than the other investments. An Alternative Investment Fund may incurhigh fees and expenses which would offset trading profits. Alternative Investment Funds are not required to provideperiodic pricing or valuation information to investors. The Manager of an Alternative Investment Fund has totalinvestment discretion over the investments of the Fund and the use of a single advisor applying generally similartrading programs could mean a lack of diversification, and consequentially, higher risk. Investors may have limitedrights with respect to their investments, including limited voting rights and participation in the management of the

    Fund.

    Alternative Investments by their nature, involve a substantial degree of risk, including the risk of total loss of aninvestor's capital. Fund performance can be volatile. There may be conflicts of interest between the AlternativeInvestment Fund and other service providers, including the investment manager and sponsor of the AlternativeInvestment. Similarly, interests in an Alternative Investment are highly illiquid and generally are not transferablewithout the consent of the sponsor, and applicable securities and tax laws will limit transfers.

    Strategic Long Term Assumptions

    The data regarding strategic assumptions has been generated by GSAM for informational purposes. As such data isestimated and based on a number of assumptions; it is subject to significant revision and may change materially withchanges in the underlying assumptions. GSAM has no obligation to provide updates or changes. The strategic long-term assumptions shown are largely based on proprietary models and do not provide any assurance as to futurereturns. They are not representative of how we will manage any portfolios or allocate funds to the asset classes.

    A di

  • 8/8/2019 Litterman Asset Allocation

    58/58

    Appendix

    These examples are for illustrative purposes only and are not actual results. If any assumptions used do not prove tobe true, results may vary substantially.

    This material is provided for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offeror solicitation to buy or sell securities.

    Simulated Performance

    Simulated performance is hypothetical and may not take into account material economic and market factors thatwould impact the advisers decision-making. Simulated results are achieved by retroactively applying a model withthe benefit of hindsight. The results reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, but do not reflect fees,transaction costs, and other expenses, which would reduce returns. Actual results will vary.

    Views and opinions expressed are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a recommendation by GSAM

    to buy, sell, or hold any security. Views and opinions are current as of the date of this presentation and may be

    subject to change, they should not be construed as investment advice.

    Opinions expressed are current opinions as of the date appearing in this material only. No part of this material may,without GSAMs prior written consent, be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form, by any means, or (ii)distributed to any person that is not an employee, officer, director, or authorized agent of the recipient.

    Copyright 2007, Goldman, Sachs & Co. All rights reserved.