livelihoods diversity study in zimbabwe_popular
TRANSCRIPT
“I am doing my own thing!”
LIVELIHOODS DIVERSITY STUDY IN ZIMBABWE
Prosper B. Matondi
October 2011
Study commissioned by Oxfam, Harare, Zimbabwe
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
i
“I am doing my own thing!”
LIVELIHOODS DIVERSITY STUDY IN ZIMBABWE
Prosper B. Matondi
October 2011
Study commissioned by Oxfam, Harare, Zimbabwe
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
ii
By way of Introduction...
Zimbabwe has gone through a difficult socio-economic development process in the last 10 years.
Today the issues of livelihoods have taken centre stage, simply because the country desperately
needs to forge forward through mastering the courage to find practical and workable solutions to
improve the lot of people‟s lives. Through focusing on the economic dimension of how people live
their life, we argue in this popular version that there are lots of possibilities at multiple levels not
yet explored that could help people address the economic challenges they face. This is the import
of our sharing the potential solutions towards shaping Zimbabwe‟s future and the prerequisites
to achieving a profitable future for Zimbabweans.
Unemployment in Zimbabwe remains very high, while job creation has remained depressed in
both the private and public sectors. The result is that the majority of people are engaged in
transitional economic activities, such as the road side selling of airtime cards and a range of
commodities (vegetables and processed foods), retailing imported goods, within the context of
what can be characterized as ad hoc economic activities. These activities can enable individuals
just to survive and get by, but they remain the potential of sowing seeds of future conflicts,
particularly for youths with very little opportunities and disillusioned by the shrinking prospects.
At the same time, NGOs and development agencies still remain stuck in promoting short-term
humanitarian or emergence assistance, with development interventions being small in scale and
reach, within a typical fashion of “keeping rural people busy but poor”. The point being that
outside assistance has been critical for Zimbabweans, but it remains far short to get Zimbabwe
moving and growing its economy and the livelihoods of its people. In this context what should we
be doing as a nation?
We attempt to answer this question in this popular version of a major survey we undertook in 3
provinces of Zimbabwe. The full report is referenced as Prosper B. Matondi, 2011. Livelihoods
Diversity Study in Zimbabwe, Oxfam, Ruzivo Trust, Harare. In this popular version, we discuss a
summary of the key findings in the different sectors, the driving force for livelihoods, the
prerequisites, the role of government, private sector, NGOs in livelihoods support. We end by
providing recommendations of what can be potentially done to get people‟s economies back on
track. At the end, we believe that through knowledge sharing and dialogue we are able to link
unconnected actors to become exceptional crossroads of possibilities and exchanges of
experiences.
Harare, 2011
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
1
UNDERSTANDING LIVELIHOODS DIVERSITY IN
ZIMBABWE
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
2
A1.Context of Livelihoods in Zimbabwe Zimbabwe has been characterized as an agro-based
country, with agriculture contributing about 14
percent of the Gross National Product before 2000.
In general, Zimbabwe has hidden livelihoods
opportunities that have largely been unexplored
because of the view that agriculture is central to the
livelihoods of the people. While indeed, agriculture
should be in this position, it has been observed that
there is a lack of reliable data about rural
populations, which makes it difficult for government
to design policies to expand economic opportunities
for the rural poor. At least half to three quarters of
rural Zimbabwean people engage in non-agricultural
activities to supplement their agricultural earnings.
Given that such a large population is into a myriad
of economic earning activities, there is a need to
understand such activities and what they mean for
local people and communities.
A2. Understanding Livelihoods
All about livelihoods Livelihoods are becoming a key feature in human
life, but understanding what constitutes a livelihood
is complex. The different ways of supporting one‟s
life by engaging in formal or informal trade, business
or any income generating activity is what comprises
a livelihood. It also entails managing and coping
with relationships in the family and community,
dealing with uncertainties and at the same time
responding to new opportunities. However at best,
when people talk about livelihoods, they tend to
limit it to economic welfare or activities that
generate an income for living, usually narrowly
restricted to agriculture. While this is important,
livelihoods are very broad and encompass many
components that must be explored. These
components constitute what since the 1990s has
been popularized as the Sustainable Livelihoods
Framework, developed by the Institute of
Development Studies of the United Kingdom.
Economic dimension of livelihoods Livelihoods are the way people live, and to meet
their needs people pursue different forms of
economic activities influenced by a range of factors
that are personal (meeting basic needs, talent,
personal history in family or simply by accident) due
to personal development (education, skills
development) and context (access to resources
such as finance, enabling government policy on for
instance empowerment or
indigenization/affirmative action).
A3. Livelihoods Diversity Concepts
Livelihoods Diversity Livelihoods diversification means engaging in a
range of activities based on capabilities and
resources one has at their disposal. Livelihoods
diversification has various dimensions that
encompass: a) diverting from a core generating
income activity to provide people with alternative
options for survival through production for food and
income; b) it also implies that when options are
limited or when a household cannot sustain
production, they may search for alternative survival
means: c) diversification implies being innovative or
creative by utilizing a core resource underpinning
the socio-economic reproduction of the household
at a particular period of time; e) in business
etiquette diversifying could be rebranding a key
economic activity to exploit new markets or
opportunities because the lifespan (in terms of face
value) of a product has outlived its usefulness; f)
value addition by processing or semi - processing of
goods to increase income earning opportunities as
well as mitigation of risks is a key element of
diversification.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
3
Why diversify livelihoods after all? Rural households engage in multiple activities and
rely on diversified income portfolios. It is widely
believed that a capability to diversify is beneficial for
households at or below the poverty line. Having
alternatives for income generation can make the
difference between minimally viable livelihoods and
destitution. The activities people adopt and the way
they invest in asset building depend in part on their
goals and priorities. However, they are also
influenced by the type of vulnerabilities they face
including shocks (drought, conflict, economic
structural adjustment, health and disease (e.g.
AIDS) overall trends (in for instance resource stocks,
population density) and seasonal variations (in, for
example agricultural output). These factors
influence people‟s vulnerability to change or
constrain their capacity to accommodate it. The
institutions and structures (governance, leadership,
markets, and tenure) that exist also determine
people‟s options. In aggregate, these conditions
determine their access to endowments and
livelihood opportunities and the way in which these
can be converted into outcomes. In this way, poverty
and the opportunities to escape from it depend on
all of the above.
The downside of livelihoods
diversification Livelihoods diversification has been attacked for its
negative influence, especially on agriculture. Yet,
contexts differ as examples in Zimbabwe show that
communities in semi-arid drought prone areas could
be better off pursuing other means of livelihoods
than concentrating on agriculture (cropping) that
has been a typical failure every season. On one
hand, livelihoods diversification has generally been
seen as a coping mechanism for the poor, hence
some people may shun the concept. However, at
some level, livelihoods diversification is about
switches from a coping to an accumulation strategy
pursued by the wealth and many middle income
households. Typically the poor lack assets for
greater accumulation, hence they may exploit a
resource simply as a basis for survival. On the other
hand, wealthier people possess skills and asset
endowment that yield far greater returns than
poorer households.
Prerequisites for livelihoods diversity Livelihoods diversity has several elements and
differs from place to place and over time, meaning
that a livelihood system is not static. There are
micro and macro-factors such as policy and
legislative regimes, cultural issues, access to
information, technological innovation, income levels
and resources available that influence livelihoods
diversity. To exploit livelihoods opportunities there
are certain conditions that are necessary, that
include peace, political and economic stability.
People and their organisations should have the
ability and confidence to participate in their
communities and in the nation-state. Globalization
has also an influence on livelihoods diversification,
given the development of communication systems
(Information Communication Technologies – ICT),
which now connects people and economies distant
from each other.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
4
A4. Importance of Livelihoods Diversification Diversification of incomes sources reduces the risks
of dependence on and failure in one enterprise.
These can be summarized as follows:
Dealing with risk and uncertainty: because of
the fear of a single activity failing to achieve the
intended output or income, one may venture
into other activities to increases opportunities
for success in the activities as opposed to
relying on one. Addressing seasonal stresses
that may come due to climatic shifts, or are
part of seasonal weather cycles.
As a coping measure: these activities emerge
either to cope with insufficiencies or in
response to stresses and shocks. These may
include a failed harvest, lack of a market for
products sourced elsewhere, loss of a job,
raising money to meet expenses accrued from
sudden or chronic illness, death and related
stresses. In the process lead to utilization of a
skill or knowledge. It may well imply also being
a mechanism for transition to new activities not
as a substitute of the existing activities but as
an addition. In this case investing in livelihoods
can save lives in the short and long term
because it means building the resilience of
communities to manage risks such as
droughts, floods, pests and other natural
calamities. This means that communities that
are sufficiently capacitated can mobilize
internal resources and systems to cushion
each other from adversity.
Livelihoods can be an empowerment process
for current and future generation: building the
wealth of the household usually is based on the
capacity of that household to take risks in
searching for alternative livelihoods. It has
been found that risk-taking households survive
adversity and have a propensity for wealth
creation. There is a saying that „wealth begets
wealth‟, meaning that once born into a wealth
family, the possibility of maintaining that
tradition is high, with new generations being
innovative to expand the wealth of the family
through diversification processes.
Local economic development: not everyone is
and should be a farmer and life is more than
farming. It has also been found that
communities producing the same commodity
for the same market tend to be poor, because
prices of that commodity are depressed.
Diversifying livelihoods means that households
in the community do different activities that are
complementary through internal and external
exchange. This creates stronger communities
that when well organized they penetrate
external markets, which brings in money into
that community.
Stronger and confident communities: a
community with a diversity of livelihoods tends
to be vibrant in terms of its social standing, is
confident in terms of handling adversity at any
time. The level of civic engagement is high. This
means that the community has a key objective
of protecting its livelihoods from any form of
erosion – internal or external.
“Not everyone should be a farmer;
life is more than farming.”
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
5
ECONOMIC BASED LIVELIHOODS ACTIVITIES
Agriculture remains the primary livelihood activity for most Zimbabweans, but what other options are there
for diversification outside this sector?
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
6
B1. Diversification within the Context of
Agriculture
Agriculture as a livelihoods option Zimbabwe is an agro-based country and the
commodity chain from production, processing and
marketing provides the largest scope for
employment and income generation. At the same
time it provides the staple food and is a source of
direct nutritious food for the families In Zimbabwe
agriculture is highly valued and tends to get
monetary preference, especially in the public sector
creating a monolith user of subsidies, compared to
other livelihoods activities. The subsidies in
agriculture have the unfortunate impact of affecting
other livelihoods sectors and throttling the
manufacturing sector (if there is an emphasis of
import of inputs). Crop (maize) production in
particular is viewed as panacea to all livelihoods
problems of the people in Zimbabwe. A distinctive
characteristic of rural households in Zimbabwe was
that families in all natural regions attempted to
secure their livelihoods from a mixture of activities
that ranged from crop and livestock production.
Farmers produce a variety of crops that includes
maize, cotton, tobacco, small grains, cotton,
sunflower, soybeans. Market gardening is also an
important preoccupation, because the people in
these districts have access to urban markets. Yet,
livestock is seriously undervalued in the drier parts
of the country. From a diversification perspective the
food supply chain showed specific gender
inequalities. In both the crop and livestock chains,
there were more male suppliers than female agro-
produce suppliers in niche markets such as
supermarkets and hotels.
Agricultural based opportunities Given that agriculture dominates employment and
income, a key factor in improving access to
employment in rural areas would be to increase
agricultural productivity. However, productivity
cannot be increased without addressing the
challenges of soil infertility, inadequate access to
water, lack of inputs, inadequate extension. In order
to enhance agricultural based opportunities,
development agencies should consider the
following:
• Provisions of resources to better off farmers
with scope for creating employment for the
poorest in a strategic and carefully managed
manner;
• Value addition should be given top priority
especially for agricultural related projects. In
this case drying of vegetables for export,
branding and packing of agricultural produce
such as small grains (millet, sorghum,
rapoko) has gained a niche market. A good
example is the Maltabella product range of
processed small grains has gained a
significant market share because of
consciousness in health eating in view of the
uncertainty over GMO processed foods that
have flooded the Zimbabwean market.
Horticulture products can be processed into
pastries, jams, tomato juices, dried tomato
leaves, preserved soups, etc. This means
investing in the area of drying equipment,
refrigeration, tinning, vacuum packing and
other necessary ancillaries.
• In the area of livestock, promotion of dried
meat (chickens, beef, goat) and raising
health awareness of these products would
help promote livelihoods for the poor.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
7
o Communities should be trained in value
addition and branding to penetrate such
markets;
o Poultry projects took communities by storm
and suddenly there is a market glut, yet there
is no organisation training poultry producers
in value addition of chickens (promoting agro-
ecology production) and branding chicken
cuts for selling.
o In the area of livestock, promotion of dried
meat (pork, beef, goat) and raising health
awareness of these products would help
promote livelihoods for the poor.
o
In the fishing sector, while some efforts have
been made in support of post-harvest
handling processes, there has been
insufficient attention to the upgrading of the
technological capabilities of micro, small and
medium entrepreneurs engaged, especially
women. The littleness of investment in this
sector is manifested in the absence of
sustained efforts to develop the capacities of
local co-operatives in post-production
management processes with a commercial
orientation. The rudimentary activities
currently in place, at all the levels of the
value chain demonstrate the existence of
great potential still to be tapped within the
fisheries sector overall.
• Investing in commercial agriculture opens
opportunities for investors to participate in
Agro goods supply chain within the tourism
industry. Health facilities, boarding schools
and towns and hotels and restaurants often
require regular supplies of fresh food in large
quantities. Men have a broader knowledge
base of agricultural techniques for quality
production than women. For example
techniques for drip irrigation and green house
production that guarantees quality are
particularly important to participate
competitively in the tourism supply chain.
• Building the capacity for market linkages for
specific agricultural produce (vegetables) and
poultry through skills and training;
• Facilitating access to market information
through designing platforms for information
processing exchange and use. The use of ICT
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
8
would go a long way given the broader
cellular connectivity in most parts of the
country. Kubatana has developed a potential
systems for commodity information using cell
phones that can be pursued by development
agencies.
B2. Rural Micro-enterprises and Services
Soft traditional informal activities While in the colonial period the soft rural enterprises
such as sewing, crocheting, cooking, baking, were
popular with women, they suffered a near death
during the ESAP period simply because the country
opened to imports which almost throttled the
clothing industry as an example. At the same time
the development of supermarket chains selling
processed food, equally killed the informal baking
activities led by women. It was a progression from
the ESAP to the Post-ESAP period, when women
entrepreneurs dominated 80 percent of SMEs.
Many of the women who participated in the soft
informal activities in Zimbabwe have never been
able to progress from groups to formalised
businesses.
Traditional beer brewing is also a „money spinner‟
especially after harvests, when people have more
time for leisure and cash. This is mainly because of
the ease of entry into informal sector activities due
to a relatively low need for initial capital input,
technology and skill. In addition, the informal
sectors activities are based on income rewarding
hard work, hence their appeal. Yet, the NGOs
continued to push for projects in this line simply
because of the nostalgia over the past success and
also as a means to reach the poor in rural areas.
Thus the donation of sewing machines became a
popular past time for politicians and NGOs to
various groups in rural areas. The sewing activities
have been harmed by the further opening up of the
country to legal and illegal imports of new and
second hand clothes. At the same time, the rapid
economic development of Asian nations and
especially China has had the knock-on effect of
killing the textile industry in Africa due to the low
„prices‟ based on the labour intensive but low wage
“Chinese” production systems. Generally, African
countries without strong trade controls have their
local industries badly affected to the extent of
collapse due to the market flooding of goods.
Rural business as a livelihood option The rural business sector accommodates many of
rural populations and plays multiple roles in rural
communities. This sector has the potential effect of
providing important practical lessons for many of
the rural enterprises in terms of how to run
businesses (livelihoods activities) on a profitable
basis. However, the talents and skills of the
businesspersons have rarely been tapped to inform
people running rural income generating activities.
Skills have largely been sought elsewhere, yet the
rural businesses provide living examples of how to
run an enterprise that could benefit people in rural
areas, if their skills and talents were to be tapped.
The mere fact of familiarity of the environment
provides an advantage for rural businesspersons. A
key issue is why do they succeed when everyone
fails and is mired in poverty? Success in such space
has a specific meaning that needs to be explored in
terms of how that can be translated into enhancing
people‟s engagement with livelihoods. Some of the
rural businesses grew in the last few years due to
chance. In the past, before 2000, it was normal to
trace how people entered formal rural business. In
many case, inheritance was the entry point for
business. However, following the economic chaos
from 2000, people could take chances by taking
advantage of opportunities.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
9
Rural artisanal services There are a number of people involved in rural
services whose key tool is their skills and the handy
tools for building, thatching, brick-making, repairs
(fencing, fixing home gargets like ox-carts etc). Rural
artisanship is a traditional pre-occupation meant to
ensure that communities have access to different
people who could build, thatch, mould bricks, and
repair things. Many of the rural artisans are usually
farmers, but use their skills to get complementary
income. Some of them work during non-agricultural
seasons (building, thatching) and they do not
consider this to be their key pro-occupation, but
claim that it enhances their status and image in the
community. The following were noted to be
common:
Skilled Artisans: brick layers, thatchers, well
diggers, who are spread in different villages
and the villagers as their clients. The skilled
artisans were largely full time workers with a
few performing their trades only during the dry
seasons. The reasons some of them ended up
in these trades range from unemployment,
need for extra cash etc.
Service Providers: usually found at rural
shopping centres and located at the backyard
of shops (welding, car repairs, electronics).
The artisans are involved in a multiple
activities. They operate small-scale units to
produce and distribute goods and services
mostly within their own communities. These
backyard industries, specifically provide
irregular income from self-employment
Grinding mills are a common source of income generation in the rural and peri-urban areas
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
10
Services sector & rural livelihoods dimension
The service economy was expanded beyond what it
was known for traditionally from independence in
1980 to the 1990s it was generally known that the
services sector was formalized, with strict
regulations. Therefore, one could identify formal
banking institutions (many of an international
nature), finalized supermarket chains operating side
by side with indigenous businesses all servicing the
same market. Yet, over time, opportunities emerged
for middle persons who largely have been seen as
parasites in certain sectors of the economy like
agriculture to play a different role. These have been
termed “makorokoza” for reaping from others
without hard work. In general “makorokoza” plays
the role of middle person through buying and
reselling goods from places of availability to places
without. Prices vary widely depending on time place
and who is trading. Exploitation of such price
difference is a major source of profit that largely is
seen as immoral by those who feel prejudiced.
In general, the services sector became “the in-thing”
as the country has literary become a service
economy. The service sector grew due to the impact
of new technologies, but also due to its response to
the informal sector that is now the largest consumer
of services largely for deal making. For instance, the
growth of business and livelihoods through selling
various cell phone paraphernalia including
handsets, recharge cards, repairs, and internet
accessories and so on has boosted this sector. In
rural areas, providing energy charging services
through power provided by the Zimbabwe Electricity
Distribution Company (ZEDC), contributes to income
diversity for those with electricity has significantly
spread livelihoods diversification, especially in the
last 2 years.
Equally, from the time of ESAP the transport sector
was deregulated, and the public bus system has
found it difficult to complete with individual taxi
operators. This opened opportunities for both rural
and urban people. Some people formally employed
diversified into this activity. This saw the growth of
the private taxi business, which penetrated even the
rural areas as the conventional bus system in rural
areas collapsed at the height of the economic crisis.
The taxi industry has had downstream benefits of
youth employment, as touts, loaders, and drivers.
Petty commodity and cross-border trading
activities
Zimbabweans are involved in cross-border trading.
They travel to sell and purchase goods from several
countries that include China, Brazil, India, Dubai,
and Malaysia etc. The commodities purchased can
be classified into two types the high–end market
and the low-end market based on the market the
goods are targeting. The majority of traders
participate in the low-end market.
Low-end market The low-end market informal cross-border trade is
one of the economic activities that have been
flourishing in rural areas for a variety of reasons.
One of the factors contributing to this phenomenon
is the interaction and mutual reinforcement
between the so-called “labour-supply push” and
“low-income-demand pull.” What is referred to as
the “labour-supply push” is characterized by: (i) high
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
11
unemployment, resulting in an increasingly cheap
labour supply; and (ii) the search for alternative or
complementary income earning opportunities as a
result of eroded income levels, decreases in the
labour force in productive enterprises and lack of
skills to enter into the shrinking formal sector. The
“low-income-demand pull” on the other hand has
the following features: (i) the existence of a large
number of poor consumers with low effective
demand for basic consumer goods offered in the
formal sector; and (ii) the existence of suppressed
demand for goods normally offered by the
commercial network and inefficiency of formal
suppliers who quite often face tremendous liquidity
problems. However, some of the cross border
activities are based on rural entrepreneurship and
ingenuity found in the art and culture industry.
There has been an upsurge of trading activity, much
of it conducted by women, but over the last 2 years
men increasingly entering this activity. With the
collapse of formal trading systems, individuals
stepped in to provide the goods and services
creating an informal economy that has effectively
dwarfed the formal one. Flea Market operations
have multiple scale as re-sales to distant rural areas
is the norm. This means that there are three or
more layers of middle persons such that the same
commodities are sold several times before they get
to the final consumer. Chronic shortages of virtually
all commodities on the formal market have made
the trading of almost anything profitable. Traders,
who now have been formalized through licensing by
local authorities, are sourcing for scarce goods
within or outside Zimbabwe for re-sale. The flea
market operators were located right in front of the
premises of shops, capturing the market of the
owners who are charged more. The business
operators felt that local authorities were punitive to
the established business and discourage entry for
people, which encourages illegal operations.
We found that the majority play “all manner of hook
and crook” (kukiyakiya) to get the commodities. In
most cases, bargaining/negotiations is a key means
to make a successful sale. There is no standard
pricing for any goods. In this industry, people source
and sell scarce commodities in the uncertain
environment such that people have to constantly
change the types of commodities they trade in
response to market demands. The import of
groceries from outside the country was negatively
affected by the change over to the use of multi-
currencies in 2008. Slowly, the formal retail sector
started to take over through volume and reduced
pricing making imports of such goods unviable.
However, since 2008, a significant change towards
consumer goods price stabilization was brought by
the stabilization of the supply of fuel, which used to
be a major driving force for high pricing.
High-end market Cross-border trade has a long history in Zimbabwe
but has been taken to new heights over the last
couple of years in terms of coverage and the type of
goods involved. In addition to the traditional
destinations like South Africa, Botswana,
Mozambique, Zambia, international destinations
like Dubai and China especially with expensive and
cheap quality goods of all kinds. However, some
high-end middle and upper classes targeting the
high end markets have also emerged bring mostly
expensive goods from USA, United Kingdom and
some European countries. In the study areas we did
not find any high-end traders, and instead the
majority is into low-end activities as discussed
above. There is an expectation of the growth of the
high-end market in areas such as Zvishavane
because of mining.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
12
Opportunities to diversify based on the
following:
Pull factors: Hope for better income, preference
for self-employment, skills in the individual or
family background in business and also lack of
alternatives and suffering;
Opportunities factors: availability of new
technology making enterprises more profitable;
Growth in markets (and demand for agricultural
products) alongside the general development of
the economy; Development of transport and
communications (improved access to growing
markets - local, national and international);
Resource factors: own savings; an idea of what
they want to do, human Capital; natural
resources in the area.
Constraining factors in the informal sector
The sector faces huge challenges, with finance
being a key, yet there are also social challenges that
face mostly women as described below. Operational
challenges are:
General challenges: business education and
business experience; Sufficient resources and
capital; Little or no access to credit for
expansion; most suffer from poor infrastructure,
insecurity, extremely competitive markets, and
an unfavourable institutional environment; there
is little information on “new” micro- enterprises
such as technology firms, business process
outsourcing; lack of innovation and lack of
access to key tools for success in business;
Information on what activities to do (or toolkits)
Inadequate knowledge on securing business
knowledge: rural women in particular face
challenges on knowledge searches simply
because they play the role of mothers with
greater responsibility at home, thus limiting their
networks;
Problems of scale of operation: the majority of
women operate at a subsistence income
generating level and therefore do not qualify for
the majority of financial assistance from
financial houses,
Inadequate knowledge on securing credit: for
example presentation of viable business plans,
even when they have them, they are subjected
to expensive short term funding (typically 30-90
days maximum, with interest hovering from 10-
20 percent). In general cross-border traders find
it a challenge to acquire loans from banks, they
are in most cases required to register as
companies in order to be eligible for loan
application. This is a huge challenge since
registration is also expensive.
Marketing problems: The women traders might
face tough competition from established
businesses. They might also decide to sell
certain products without carrying out sufficient
market research on products and as such risk
being exploited.
Challenges of a social nature includes the following:
Lack of economic security: They lack benefits
such as pension, medical insurance or social
security, which means when not healthy,
business is negatively affected and ability to
recover and get back may take longer;
Health problems: Due to the various transport
constraints sometimes they use unsafe
“the talents and skills of businesspersons have rarely been tapped
into, to inform people running rural income generating activities”
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
13
transport means and also tend to have heavy
baggage making them prone to backaches
among other health problems;
Stereo-typing of cross-border traders: In most
cases cross-border trading is associated with
promiscuity, hence some women are denied the
opportunity to trade regionally or internationally
by their spouses;
Lack of adequate trade documentation: Most
women travel to countries outside to sell their
products without proper documentation and
face deportation and imprisonment if caught by
authorities and in the process lose their goods;
Gender bias resulting in attitude problems:
insensitivity and prejudice of loan officers as a
result of their own backgrounds and
socialisation;
Non-existent or insufficient family support: while
men tend to be drawn into the world of
individual pursuit, women due to the threat of
abandonment and divorce operate more
commonly in human economies based on family
and other mutual support networks. In general,
rural women indicated in the interviews that
face cultural constraints to start non-traditional
types of enterprises. They tend to start
enterprises related to the home based
industries like soap making, candle making,
bread baking, dressmaking, and other domestic
related activities.
Informal sector recommendations
The informal trade sector dominated by flea
markets is regarded as a transitional economic
activity, yet given the political challenges of
Zimbabwe it seems that the sector will remain for
some time. However, the informal trade though
populated by many people trying to eke a living for
their families have not received attention by
development agencies and the private sector. It is
for this reason that organizations can ride on this
sector based on the opportunities it provides
(income, employment, as well as high population
providing a scope for educational awareness and
campaigns in the areas of gender rights and HIV and
AIDS). The specific recommendations are that:
• Many of the traders lack skills in financial
management: the development agencies
should design training course of business
and financial management, project
management, by-laws and regulations,
negotiations skills, health, leadership;
• Financing mechanisms: the „pooling of cash”
(marounds) should continue to be
encouraged and a way established for linking
these to financial institutions. This is because
they provide a unique way of raising cash for
projects, while they can reduce transaction
costs because the groups are based on
relationships and therefore trust.
• Training on collective action: though co-
operatives seem unpopular, NGO
interventions are based on groups hence it is
necessary to train beneficiaries on
leadership, group formation, group dynamics
that could help the entrepreneurs in
procurement process, shared responsibility
for infrastructure development and
maintenance.
• Informal sector traders be organized to lobby
for policy change through providing training
to their members;
• Capacitating the entrepreneurs to spread the
message on HIV and AIDS, gender rights,
resources rights etc, given that in this sector,
different categories of people (young old,
literate and semi literate, men/women) are
finding a real income base for their families.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
14
B3. Nature Based Rural Enterprises
Natural Resources Sectors Diversification for the poor has generally been into
the use of natural resources for their income
earning:
• Commercialization of indigenous trees: in
some areas hardwoods such as Mopani tree
offers economic opportunities for individuals
and communities, as well as Rural District
Councils. However, communities complained
that local people are prejudiced from
benefitting from the resource by private
companies that work with RDCs. It is
necessary that dialogue commence so that
local communities as well as the companies
can benefit from empowerment through equity
shares.
• Timber and Non-timber forestry products:
Binga and surrounding environments are
populated by master wood carvers and
carpenters, with a tradition of making the
popular wood products. In general trees
provide two sets of products:
o Timber products: these include Tonga stools,
chairs, aprons, doors, drums etc. We found
that the Tonga drums brought the creativity of
the Tonga people (which must be paid for in
business terms), which bestows a variety of
personal benefits including a sense of identity,
self-reliance, self-awareness, empowerment,
confidence and cultural esteem. The drums
are acquired not just by tourists, but are now a
feature in modern home decors, are bought by
schools for use in cultural performances.
o NTFP: Fruits processing and sales (seasonal),
grass commoditization, honey processing
drum making, provides opportunities for
income earning for rural families. The issues
of NTFP relates to commercialization, which at
times elicits conflicts of various proportions in
communities and families. This is because,
such resources can generate an income that
can divide people who view such resources as
being owned by everyone. This is the reason
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
15
o why government introduced the prohibition of
the sale of NTFP for commercial purposes.
Opportunities for economic development
projects based on value addition. In this
context, development agencies can work with
communities to explore a range of resources,
such as processing natural resources into oils,
drinks, jams and jellies. Honey for instance
can provide numerous benefits to families in
the form of honey (consumption and sale),
wax for candle making etc. Equally trees such
as marula and plans such as moringa,
provides scope for the processing of
cosmetics and medicines that can widely be
accessed and generate income for rural
people;
• Small-scale mining: One of the key livelihoods
activities that have progressively taken the
country by storm is illegal mineral exploitation.
Many people find the activity as an easy way
to earn money, for the tools of the trade (pick,
shovel, and a dish) are easy to acquire for
alluvial gold panning. In some cases, gold
panning is widely done during off agricultural
season. This was initially mainly to
supplement household income, but for some it
is now a key livelihood strategy, because they
make more money out of it. In fact, the firming
of the international prices on minerals in
general has contributed to the growth of this
activity. Yet historically government has not
been fully interested in re-organizing panners
into organized forms for the purposes of
mining in a mutual reinforcing relationship. In
fact when ordinary people try to do small scale
mining, they have to endure more policing and
roadblocks, interference in their lives, have
their land taken away, be subject to
imprisonment for petty thefts of small
quantities of mineral products and so on.
• Fishing: fishing is a key economic livelihood
activity in places with water, such as in the
Zambezi valley. The Tonga people have been
known as riverine communities engaging in
fishing, fish processing and selling, while also
many were employed in the sector deriving
their own livelihoods. The sector has specific
gender inequality issues that the people noted
should be addressed.
• Tourism related sectors: riverine communities
also employed a large number of people.
There are numerous tourist facilities that have
been established to carter for fishmongers, or
tourists who frequent riverine areas in the
Zambezi valley for instance.
• Wildlife resources: According to the study
findings, communities blessed with wildlife
still implement Community Management
Programme for Indigenous Resources
(CAMPFIRE). Under the programme,
communities are encouraged to conserve
wildlife. The revenue generating activities such
as hunting are used for community
development. Meat from killed animals is left
for communities to share and hunters take the
trophy (normally the head with its horns) and
skin. There should be local benefits of many of
the products and by-products from wildlife.
• Other natural resources: selling of soil (river
sand and top soil) for building, procuring and
selling quarry stones, selling manure in urban
areas, selling fire wood to both urban and
rural areas, selling poles.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
16
Recommendations on the Natural Resources
Sector
This sector provides the greatest scope for the poor
because it has low transaction costs at the
production level, given that resources are usually
“free” as they are abstracted from the commons. In
addition, technical skills are acquired locally
meaning that the activities do not lend themselves
to complex mechanization. Perhaps the only
difference will be with eco-tourism, which requires
the setting up of expensive infrastructures by local
standards such as a chalets and services for the
convenience of the potential tourist. We recommend
the following for the exploitation of the resources:
• Making and marketing natural resources
products: development agencies can work
with communities to explore a range of
resources, such as processing natural
resources into oils, drinks, jams and jellies.
Organisations such as the Southern African
Indigenous Resources (SAFIRE) and Phyto-
Trade has successful helped women to market
fine products (essential oils, soaps,
shampoos) made from marula, and other
natural resources products to lucrative
markets in Europe and Asia.
• Fisheries industry: Women fish traders noted
that training has been inadequate and that
they have not been fully organised to be able
to raise capital for their activities. It is
recommended that development agencies
design comprehensive training programmes,
towards the empowerment of the fish
mongers, processors, traders, rather than the
piecemeal and one off training programmes
that have been offered to date. In addition, the
youths should be engaged into this sector,
given that many of them are not participating
because of the risks and prohibitive costs.
• Mining sector: the issue of indigenisation and
economic empowerment with respect to this
sector is receiving attention. At the same time,
the government is giving out Mining license to
specific groups such as Youth and Women, yet
the generality of the people have no
information about what is going on.
Development agencies have shied away from
this sector, for it is regarded as too political,
yet the sector provides the greatest scope for
the economic empowerment of the people.
Development agencies in mining areas could
provide soft skills (training, capacity
development, basic information) for the
people to appreciate this sector. Given that
the sector, is a cash spinner, youths would
find it attractive to get organised so that they
can approach the authorities with for license if
they are organised. Such organisation comes
from skills training and linking up the youths
to relevant technical bodies that deals with
mining related issues.
B4. Cultural Products and Services
Diversity and benefits from the sector Culture can be a potential income earner in many
ways. In general, the tendency has been to support
the hard products part of
• Performing arts for livelihoods: in the form of
music, dances, and poetry can be a basis for
income generation. We found that a few
African countries such as South Africa
(kwaito), Burkina Faso (Djembe), Kenya, and
Democratic Republic of Congo (Kwasa
Kwasa), have pushed for recognition of
indigenous music and dance as a basis for
wealth creation as it is seen as a past time
activity. It is only when indigenous music,
dance, theatre and poetry is identified by
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
17
foreigners, especially from Europe that it gains
significance. Performing arts is an important
medium for communicating HIV and AIDS
through drama and choir. Youth groups could
benefit from penetrating forums such as HIFA,
regional festivals, and international ones using
their culture as the medium for entertainment.
• Curio making and marketing: the culture
sector provides scope for high income earning
by creating market opportunities for curios,
particularly baskets. The master wood carvers
used to have potential markets to make
money at the height of Zimbabwe tourism
days. This activity is highly dependent on
biomass;
• Basket weaving and marketing: A major
livelihood activity of basket weaving provides
important opportunities for women and youth
through income earnings. Individuals and
groups could get mileage through obtaining
regular buyers from South Africa, Harare
through the Harare International Festival of
Arts (HIFA).
• Green tourism: there are possibilities for
Green Tourism that combines nature,
agriculture, with cultural tourism. The
environment of major urban areas can provide
opportunities, as children and adults and
cities could visit through school or weekend
tour packages.
Challenges faced in the sector There is little support for the crafts industry because
the tourism sector that used to be the anchor
collapsed in the last ten years. However, the
opportunity costs to enter the sector are very low
given that artists depend on their talents or
knowledge and local resources whose abstraction is
from zero to minimal. The availability of the products
in local areas mean that the technologies used in
the collection generally require minimal use of
capital resources (if any), but require larger units of
labour per output obtained. Organisation should
help market cultural products and handcrafts made
from wood and grass.
Recommendations for the sector We therefore recommend that:
• Training on production processes are required
so that artist entrepreneurs do not over
harvest the resources they depend on. The
Binga Trees Trust for example has been
training communities of woodland
preservation as they carry out their arts
businesses and programmes of that nature
should be scaled up.
• Market linkages be developed for artists. In
often cases, artists have largely depended on
tourists coming to them; however, there is a
need for development agencies to facilitate
communities to explore external markets
(HIFA, ZITF, shows, regional and international
markets). The strategy should be to build the
confidence of the artists to be able penetrate
these markets. For instance, the stone
sculpture industry survived the crisis because
they managed to penetrate such markets.
Development agencies could also explore
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
18
linking up and networking using the platform
such as National Associations. For instance
the National Handicraft Centre was
established to address market access barrier
to SMEs involved in Craft. Situated in Harare,
the centre provides shop floor space for
individuals and craft groups, support towards
product development and pricing and market
linkages.
• Performing arts (poetry, songs, music and
dance) have not received adequate attention,
yet there are numerous forums where
communities can generate an income.
Examples include the following:
o Arts calendars such as HIFA have
provided important avenues for
communities. Ntengwe through
community film-making has
penetrated international markets and
this model should further be
promoted. Development agencies can
provide communities with information
and strategies in which they can
penetrate, because more often the
communities lack basic information.
o Many hotels, eating houses with a
traditional food niche provide space
for arts groups to provide
entertainment, and development
agencies promoting performing arts
could consider penetrating such
tourism, besides exporting performing
arts to the region and other countries.
Training and confidence building of the
communities and the groups will be a
key strategy.
Tonga baskets weaved in Binga have sold lucratively at local and international craft fairs
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
19
GENESIS OF LIVELIHOODS DIVERSITY
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
20
C1. What Causes People to Diversify? In the last 20 years, diversification in Zimbabwe has
been a progressive process responding to different
forces and imperatives. In the 1990s those who
diversified and created self-employment were
lauded for their courage to be entrepreneurs. In
fact, when asked one‟s line of business, the
response would be “I am doing my own thing”. Yet,
today those who diversified into low market end
businesses such as flea markets may be looked
down upon by society. Why has society shifted
attitudes? First, people diversified probably in large
numbers due the difficulties caused by Zimbabwean
politics that negatively affected the economy.
Therefore, people sought any means available for
their own survival. Young professional people who
have been made redundant as companies closed
rely on providing services in the informal sector (car
services, home repair services, building and
plumbing, electric repairs). People are no longer
confined to specialization and are multi-skilled in
activities that raise money for themselves and their
families. In most of the urban areas the selling of
seasonal fruits (oranges and bananas), roasted dry
maize (maputi) and ground nuts, roasted maize
cobs, seasonal vegetables (tomatoes, leafy veggies),
cigarettes, juice cards (mobile phone recharge
cards), newspaper vending, furniture disposal,
selling of sand, quarry, bricks, are some of the
common informal activities that have moved into
the suburbs away from the formal vending sites.
Second, people who were rendered jobless by the
policy changes, diversified to deploy their talents to
make money, and maintained core activities while
doing other things. A case in point was double and
triple jobbing to make ends meet. For instance,
some commercial sex workers would engage in
buying and reselling during the day and engage in
commercial sex work during the night. Others would
work at a company during the day, and by end of
day and during weekends they would engage in all
sorts of repair. At times they would poach the
company customers, and even steal repair parts for
their private work at home and undesignated areas,
as a means of survival. Third, others diversified
because they are talented in the trade they are
engaged in. Fourth, some people in rural areas
diversified, because agriculture was not providing
the returns for them to meaningfully survive.
Agriculture outputs markets had too many controls
to the extent that farmers failed to break even or to
raise enough for their survival due to the nature of
the pricing regimes. Farmers thus diversified their
cropping regimes to avoid the controlled crops, but
also invested outside agriculture into other business
ventures. Fifth, people diversified due to new
opportunities emerging, for instance the discovery of
diamonds in Manicaland provided people
opportunities to provide services to the miners.
C2. What areas do people diversify to?
Rural livelihoods are based on a wide range of
portfolios, and these have rapidly changed in the 10
years. Zimbabwe‟s economy is largely agrarian
therefore, most people were involved in this sector
before venturing into other livelihood activities.
Adults (men and women) tended to be stick to
agriculture and they diversify to support agriculture
than the other way round. Diversification was also
“I am doing my own thing”
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
21
regarded as temporary for some, until such a time
that it was viable to continue their agricultural
activities. The proportion of men who entered the
agriculture sector rose in the last 5 years reflecting
the difficulties in formal employment, associated
with the economic crisis. Education was noted as a
key factor determining what livelihoods activities
that people do. In general, we found that rural
communities also support each other through
providing labour paid in kind in various ways such as
labour exchanges, use of implements, in the form of
goods and services etc, which lessened the burden
in certain physical activities. Vending also carries
the largest proportion of people employed in the
sector with women being in the majority. Reasons
for this include minimal requirements for starting up
vending enterprises, for example, low capital
injection, proximity of suppliers and produce as well
as minimal skills required to conduct the activity.
This is followed by the crafts industry. The livelihood
activities are distributed along gender lines with
more men taking up activities such as brick laying,
brick making, thatching, welding and carpentry;
activities which are more physically demanding and
are thus synonymous with the male sex. On the
other hand, women are involved in traditionally
„female‟ activities such as sewing, interior décor.
C3. At what stage do people diversify?
It seems that after years of doing a certain activity,
people try out different other thing either because
they are bored, are not making money, or they have
found a new opportunity. In Zimbabwe, most of the
business people have been operating for the past 5-
10 years. Those with more than 10 years of
business experience follow closely behind which
means that more people tend to settle within their
respective trades for relatively long periods of time.
More women stay in business for longer periods of
time than men. This can be attributed to the fact
that, unlike men, women have more responsibilities
and factors to consider before shifting enterprises.
In addition, men seek ventures that yield speedy
returns therefore, they shift enterprises more
frequently than women.
C4. Attributes in livelihoods diversification A vocabulary dominating: “courage”, “talent”,
“searching for kurarama (living/surviving)”, were the
key attributes that dominated economic livelihoods
diversification. In general, we found that people
participated in different livelihood activities due to a
variety of reasons. These include:
Doing everything (Buya
tinapangana/babazonke! or kukiya kiya):
generally entrepreneurs had no lines of
specialty. Women predominate in trade (flea
markets, vegetable sales), where as men
dominated the rural businesses, services, yet
they are also the majority in agriculture;
Education: they use literal levels as a tool for
exploring opportunities, finding out the inability
of different enterprises and how to manoeuvre
systems as they go look for goods to resale.
Physical fitness: for travelling is a key
requirement, which the young were able to do
to move voluminous goods in difficult transport
systems – for instance through using
„magonyeti‟ (haulage trucks); The mean age
being 18 to 45 years.
Skills: a key example is skills requirement was
in the area of fishing because to catch the fish
one needed to be skilled in fishing and
understanding water and its contents. For
performing the performing arts, wood curving
etc, one needed specialist skills for the
business to make sense;
Courage: the will power to be able to do
something was commonly referred in the study
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
22
as underpinning the success of livelihoods
activities. In Binga the fishers noted the ability
to survive the marauding crocodiles and hippos
as a key attribute.
Hard work: Much of the rural livelihoods
activities requires hard work, with high levels of
organisation (kurongeka).
Labour: we found that a very few of the
businesses employ outside labour – the owner
is the sole owner and have a few employees
who usually are related to the owner; Many are
casual workers, trainees, and, especially in
rural areas, family members.
Risk takers: the young tend to be risk takers by
going to unexplored and unfamiliar places.
They have specific preference of activities that
usually use their education.
The young tend to be risk takers by venturing into unexplored “livelihood” territories
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
23
PEOPLE IN ECONOMIC BASED LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES
More women are undertaking diverse livelihood activities across the country
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
24
D1. Who are the people diversifying their
livelihoods?
The survey reveals that there is diversity in most
people‟s sources of income as people do not sorely
rely on one enterprise for survival. Much of the
livelihoods activities are dominated by own
proprietorship, even though at times family
members may contribute to the initial capital or to
labour. A number of household members usually get
to support a potentially viable venture involved in an
activity. This could apply to families with their own
business venture such as a shop or milling plant or
a family that relies on agriculture and whose labour
is provided by members of the household. In
general, we found that the productive age group of
18 to 45 years dominated the rural micro-
enterprises. On balance, there were more women
than men in many of the dominant activities, yet in
the lucrative sectors in income terms, there was stiff
competition and women shied away.
The petty commodity trade business was one of the
major absorber of school leavers and those made
redundant from work before retirement age. The
limited opportunities forced them into the
commodity trade business. On the other hand, the
elderly, especially women tended to be absorbed in
weave baskets business. The women in Binga
explained that the younger women would source for
the raw materials and elderly women would do the
weaving at home. Gender roles were apparent. Men
were the fishers as they used all manner of
equipment from wooded homemade rowing boats to
fishing Riggs. In this sector, women were relegated
to the fish processing (cleaning, drying, selection) of
which school children also helping during the school
holidays. Marketing was also a key pre-occupation
of women. The petty commodity trade used to have
more women, but recently more men, especially
between the 18 and 45 years increased in that
sector. On the other hand, men dominated illegal
mining activities, with crop production being family
oriented, but women and children providing the bulk
of the labour. Men dominated in the ownership of
large livestock (cattle, donkeys), with women owning
small stock.
D2. Gender dimension of livelihoods Agriculture in the last 10 years has been
unattractive for many people who lost jobs in the
last 10 years and from a gender perspective, the
mere fact that land is controlled by men provide
complexities in the entry of women in non-
agricultural sources of income. It must be
underlined that many livelihood diversification
strategies are frequently gender specific. In the
search for income earning opportunities, rural
dwellers have embarked on major socio-economic
transformation. Social boundaries are being
redrawn to maximize on livelihoods opportunities
and the scramble for the opportunities has
transformed the age-old gender and generational
division of labour. In fact, women are undertaking a
similarly wide range of diversification activities as
men, but in many contexts, men are able to avail
themselves to diversification opportunities that are
not open to women due to cultural constraints.
Women try to renegotiate this to protect themselves
against the break-up of the household. The reality is
that the same women engaged in petty trade,
natural resources commercialization dabbles in food
production activities, which creates an antagonistic
situation. Mapping when (during any one season)
and where women are positioned in household
livelihood cycles based on the time for particular
activities is significant for establishing the point of
entry for government and other development
agencies.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
25
D3. Youths and livelihoods diversity In Zimbabwe youths took the so-called parallel
market activities by storm at the height of the
economic crisis. Youths were partaking diversified
livelihoods activities by default simply because there
was no alternative source of employment. Over time,
the capacity of government and the private sector to
absorb youth for formal employment came to a
standstill, and many also migrated to seek for
greener pastures in the neighbouring countries and
beyond. At the same, time with the increase in
discovery of minerals, such as gold and diamonds,
the highly migratory youths criss-crossed the
country, especially between 2006 and 2008 looking
for opportunities. Yet, the formalisation of the
economy from 2009, closed the loopholes that
made youths make a lot of money through
unproductive changing of money or reselling goods
at very high prices. Many of the youths, have largely
been relegated to the reselling of juice cards, while
others try out „anything‟ that provides them with an
income.
Rural youth's prospect of finding decent work has
not grown in the last 2 years. Yet, in more diversified
economies, rural youngsters have better options to
find work outside of agriculture, especially if they
have the required education and/or vocational
skills. Such employment opportunities will often be
located at a distance from their home villages. Thus,
apart from education and skills, rural youth often
migrate in order to access non-agricultural
employment opportunities. Young people in
Zimbabwe are generally better educated than their
parents' generation and are likely to be more open
to change. Therefore, focusing on livelihoods
diversification, including broader empowerment
programmes can provide youths with leeway to be
gainfully engaged in livelihoods activities.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
26
WHAT IS THE RESULT OF INVESTING IN LIVELIHOODS
DIVERSITY?
Realising meaningful income from livelihood activities is the ambition of many
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
27
E1. Income dimension of diversification In some contexts, rural non-farm activities can
contribute to the smoothing of household income
within a season, because income earned can
complement farm income. Many livelihood activities
such as pensions, off-farm work and remittances
are critical to maintain adequate levels of well-
being. In some cases, farming was the principal
livelihood but was supported through sales of
livestock, remittance payments or waged work. In
other households, these support payments were the
only means of cash income, as poorer households
had few livestock and limited access to the means
of farming. Non-farm income was used for the
purchase of agriculture; inputs at a time when donor
and government input subsidies had been
withdrawn for the able-bodied and productive age
groups. Those in the informal sector placed
themselves on “moral high grounds” of being the
“Diaspora” for their own relatives at home who
depend on them for inputs on their activities.
Therefore, flea market operators fund agriculture.
However, they may not by the nature and scale of
their earnings send regular remittances. They
contribute to major one off or seasonal purchase for
their families. The income derived from different
enterprises in particular petty commodity trade was
exaggerated.
E2. Asset dimension of livelihoods There was a mixed experience on how the income
gained from agriculture and non-agricultural sources
was used. While, a significant proportion of
respondents indicated that they did not acquire
assets during the past 10 years, we found that after
2008 asset acquisition seem to have increased.
Investment in crop inputs usually follows, and then
livestock (small stock at first then cattle). In
addition, building or improving a home are also
relatively common but secondary to daily needs and
human capital expenses. It was thus necessary to
explore how remittances are contributing to
livelihoods diversification. Money from other sources
outside agriculture was mostly used to for daily
survival, acquisition of kitchenware, and farm
equipment. Households draw their modes of
livelihood from quite distinct portfolios of activities.
They have different asset bases, with the poorest
households most limited in terms of capital assets.
Those with capital asset bases and demonstrate
flexibility in how they create positive livelihood
outcomes and increased well-being. The ability to
mobilize and use capital, skills and assets
productively provides the biggest scope for wealth
creation and off setting any risk for both poor and
better off households. On the other hand, the
negative livelihood outcomes for the poor, means
that they require long term and strategic
intervention than just giving them free handouts.
The respondents suggested long training in different
thematic areas with start up capital as key to
changing their circumstances.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
28
PREREQUISITIES FOR SUCCESS IN ECONOMIC BASED
LIVELIHOODS ACTIVITIES
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
29
F1. Sourcing of capital for livelihoods
diversity
Capital from formal institutions Entrepreneurs in the various enterprises have never
had access to finance from formal institutions and
that the money they get has been from their social
networks or the previous employment activities.
There was no difference in response from rural
entrepreneurs, flea market operators in urban or
rural areas, as farmers. This is no surprise given
that in the field sites there were fewer and no
banking institutions physically, which meant that
access to bank was a problem in the first place. A
variety of reasons why rural entrepreneurs shunned
the banks were given as:
Fear of the elaborate paper work
requirement (typically noted as filling forms);
Fear of failing to pay back loans and losing
assets (collateral demands by financial
institutions);
The demand for „viable‟ project proposals
backed by collateral thus limiting lenders to
only those with assets i.e. the rich
The hyper-inflation experience until 2008,
created distrust and lack of confidence in
the banking system, making it difficult to
trust financial institutions.
The answers above reflect concerns of people who
have lost confidence in the banking sector and who
are willing to work invest and look after their
families outside formal channels. In fact, a new
parallel economy has emerged, which is difficult to
account and trace in terms of its contribution to
communities and the nation.
NGO and donor capital NGOs and donors were hailed as having made
significant contribution to communities at a time
when government and families had very little
capacity to manage on their own. However, it was
noted that their support was firstly in food provision
followed by agricultural inputs. The presence of
donor money in business was strikingly absent, with
reference to vouchers for agro-dealers emerging as
a frame to support agriculture that only started in
2010. In general rural businesses were optimistic
that it was a noble form of intervention to
resuscitate their businesses, but was regarded as
too narrow in scope around agriculture. Amongst
donors interviewed, we did not get a firm
commitment to support diverse work on livelihoods,
with much of the promises tilted towards agriculture
or related sectors.
Personal capital generation: marounds Micro-finance schemes called “marounds” or
“mikando” organized by individual women have
become the most popular means for raising capital
for “projects” that range from agricultural (poultry),
petty trading, investing in illegal mineral (gold)
purchases, repairs, food processing (honey and
spices) and marketing, imports of cheap goods and
selling at inflated prices. Marounds, comprised of
between three and twenty people who would each
contribute portions of their daily profits. The money
is given to one member of the club, on a rotational
basis. As noted from the focused group discussion,
marounds became a more convenient way of saving
in stable environment where income-earning
opportunities are low, or where financial markets
are not fully operational. The participants could
adjust the amount of the contributions at the
beginning of each cycle. It was also easy for
members to opt out of one cycle and rejoin in the
next one depending on their financial situation. In
discussing the role of “marounds” indicate that
these schemes have been thrust upon the members
by worsening economic circumstances. Rural people
have weak linkages to banks and other formal-
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
30
sector of loans. This means that the “marounds” are
filling a specific gap in rural areas. Even when
donors help with capital, there is still a need for
banks to play an active role with the support of
government through providing confidence in capital
markets.
Remittances as a source of capital for
diversification
The downturn in the Zimbabwean economy and
growing lack of waged work opportunities in major
towns and cities obviously had a significant impact
upon people‟s daily lives as remittances were
almost universally reported as having been
important at some stage in people‟s lives. The bulk
of remittances were used primarily for consumption
and then for investment in human capital including
education, health, and better nutrition. We
established during the qualitative interviews that the
proprietors of flea markets had assistance from one
or two relatives in the Diaspora. The assistance was
either temporary (one off) and the cash made
available was directly invested in acquisition of
goods. For the food send, it did not directly
contribute to the business, but provided „breathing
space‟ for the cash they had for food was then
invested in the acquisition of goods for the
business. More in-depth surveys will be required
because our analysis is based on a few interviews.
Capitalisation through barter trading The barter system served multiple purpose, chief
which was enabling exchanges, but also serving as
part of accumulation of capital, especially for rural
business persons. The barter system was preferred
because: (i) there is minimum amount of a bio-
resource required to participate in barter system, (ii)
food crop produce or fish can be used during
exchange, (iii) plants and animals both could be the
important material during exchange, (iv) sometimes
cultural items (such as Tonga mats or stools) and
handicrafts play a significant role to make exchange
for services or groceries, (v) exchanges are not
based on the design and visual quality of products;
preference principle factors are the traditional
values of the bio-resources, (vi) exchange is based
on reciprocity and complementarities and (vii) barter
is based on open access system (monopoly to
exchange bio-resources are considered to be
unethical). During the time of crisis access to barter
system depends more on good relationships. The
way barter system works suggests that exchanges
contain the following elements based on
relationship: (i) redistribution based on the degree
of relationship, (ii) percentage of demand,
traditional norms and access strategies of bio-
resources by a particular tribe and (iii) self
sufficiency based on subsistence economy which
helps to minimize over- exploitation of bio-resources.
F2. Role of technology The ability to mobilize technology (assets) was a key
driver of diversification. Therefore informal
partnerships provided opportunities for people who
did not have trade tools, creating a chain of benefits
along the product chain, in this case mining. In view
of capital challenges, the miners pointed that those
with money need to be encouraged to form
partnerships to procure equipment. However, rules
are prohibitive, and for instance in the mining
sector, the mineral detectors were regarded as an
offense by the police, classifying them as
encouraging illegal panning that finds its way to
illegal markets and not to the state. From an
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
31
environmental perspective, the current gargets used
for instance in tree cutting, of individual fishing
(rowing wooded boats), tended to be appropriate
and seem not to be the main culprit in over use of
nature resources. It is when fishing Riggs (large
boats) or fuel power wood cutters are introduced
that there is significant damage. Thus introducing
technologies has to be approached cautiously.
It also must be noted that technology change can
be negative on the growth of indigenous rural
businesses. Labour-intensive household
manufacturing of baskets, pottery, and roof
thatching, „have since died out, displaced by the
import of cheap plastic pails, iron vessels, and
corrugated roofing from urban factories. For this
reason, household manufacturing may die out in
rural areas. The demise of low- productivity
household manufacturing explains, in part, why
employment in services and commerce frequently
grows faster than in manufacturing. Changes in
consumer spending likewise contribute to faster
growth in services and commerce. Consumption
data indicate that as incomes rise, rural households
increase spending on such services as education,
health, transport, prepared foods, and transport
faster than they do on local manufactured goods.
F3. Communication and transport There is no question that the introduction of cell
phones has revolutionalized livelihoods in
Zimbabwe. People are no longer connected by
physical means as they can easily communicate. In
fact, stiff competition among phone service
providers has significantly lowered the prices of the
gargets, but also of the service charges. When
network connectivity was available, a
businessperson could check the availability and
prices of goods they require before embarking to
order. This has largely compensated for the scarcity
of transport and costs in most parts of rural areas.
In general, transport tends to be operated by less
capital-intensive methods such as scotch arts,
bicycles, and donkeys. There were a few
conventional long buses that were being used for
multi-purposes of carrying goods for the business
people and passengers. Due to the bad roads, the
wear and tear reduced the life span of the buses,
yet the operators charged social fees for the
services.
F4. Skills requirements In many conversations with petty commodity
traders, rural business people, rural artisans, youths
and cultural artists, the dominant undercurrent to
succeed in any livelihood activity is when one has
the skills in whatever enterprise one is engaged in.
The issue of skills has been side stepped in
livelihoods diversification because there is a
dominant view that Zimbabwean rural people
require inputs (seeds and fertilizer) or access to
credit. While, this is critical in the medium to long
term, the communities are better off with greater
access to skills across the livelihoods activities that
they do. A few organisations that are highly
centralised such as SEDCO and Empretec were
noted to provide skills training, as well as NGOs
through their interventions. However, the challenge
was that skills development tended to be short-
term, narrowly focused on a theme/sector, and
thinly spread only to beneficiary communities.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
32
Skills training by NGOs were not comprehensive
enough, as did not reach many entrepreneurs, while
some had specific geographical areas they
concentrated in.
Government has its own training centres, for youths
in particular but these were not of reach to non-
youths, while the curriculum tended to be too
narrow. In fact years of economic declined had
rendered many incapable of delivering skills
development in a meaningful sense. In Zimbabwe,
the need for human capital development following
more than 10 years of under investment by
government, private sector and donors is
imperative. Most rural income diversifiers have no
formal training in what they do and many depend on
the job training.
F5. Market Linkages and challenges The issue of market linkages has become stylish in
many forums and workshops, without a clear
practical solution of how it has to be done. The
discussion has been pitched theoretically, while it
has largely ignored the broader context of what the
problem is and how to solve it. It was noted that
market linkages has also been abuzz with NGOs, yet
the realities is that there is need to re-examined
broader market challenges that related to mostly
poor market infrastructure, without significant
investments in probably two decades or more.
Entrepreneurs still depend on the same market
infrastructure designed a long time ago that is
incapable of meet their business expectations.
• Capital and markets: for markets to be
functional and responding to the needs of
entrepreneurs, there is a need for functional
capital markets that in the case of Zimbabwe
remains distant for a variety of reasons
discussed earlier. It has become common to
hear the language that “the country has no
liquid”, hence capital markets have largely
remained depressed creating a situation of
peddling small “dollars” for small projects that
usual cannot meet market demand;
• Mismatch between supply and demand:
Zimbabwe is concentrating efforts on the
supply side in many sectors of the economy,
yet the demand side (in terms of capacity to
purchase and utilize services and goods) has
rarely received attention. The results is that
there is no creativity or innovation in the
market place as people do more or similar
things all the time, creating business failure in
the process.
• Natural factors: physical conditions can be a
setback to the carrying out of livelihoods
activities. These come in different forms such
as the lack of roads (to facilitate the
movement of inputs and outputs for particular
livelihoods activities). The development of
cottage industries linked to agriculture have
not been realised, simply because agriculture
has not thrived in areas such as Zvishavane
and Binga dues to poor soil fertility,
topography dominated by mountains, heat
due to a coal belt beneath, and unreliable
rainfall (climate change). These natural
challenges can be overcome through broader
infrastructural developments that make
economic sense when there is a particular
resources of higher premium benefits than the
costs of the infrastructures as seem to be the
case in the development of the road in new
coal producing areas of Binga.
• Prohibitive policies and regulations: (e.g.
mining laws, by-laws) were noted to be a
hindrance that affect negatively on livelihoods
activities. Many of the laws (and attitudes)
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
33
were derived from the colonial period, when laws were discriminatory against black people
• and restricted them from getting into own
businesses. Government has done much, but
not enough to reform the laws. Hence, at
times, government at their convenience uses
the laws and applies them because they have
not been changed. For instance, operation
murambatsvina clearly had legal instruments
backing the actions of the state, even though
the context and manner in which it was done
could be interpreted as too harsh. It is
therefore urgent that laws be reviewed and
reformed to reflect the changed nature of the
Zimbabwean society.
• Poor services: lack of electricity and power
cuts, intermittent access to water and other
services underpinned by high tariffs for
unavailable services negatively affect
businesses. For instance, this significantly
reduces options for diversity especially into
activities that require electricity such as
welding. While generators are the closest
alternative option, the costs are often a
deterrent.
• Market access challenges: the long distances
to markets often leads to losses for those into
market gardening as their produce may be
spoilt by the time they reach the market. In the
end most producers end up limiting their sales
within the local areas. Market flooding also
reduces bargaining power for profitable prices.
Other producers however, also try to seek
alternative markets in other areas. For
produce such as sweet potatoes, the option of
bread often reduces possible buyers. Women
may not be allowed to go to the main urban
markets due to fear of abuse, robbery or risks
involved in night travel. For female-headed
households, the women noted that it is more
convenient to join groups so that they can go
to the market as a group rather than as
individuals for inputs they require in their
informal businesses.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
34
POSSIBLE AND REQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
FOR LIVELIHOODS
Zimbabwe must work for the benefit of all...
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
35
G1. Central government mechanisms The broad goal of central government is to ensure
that rural development is spread within the
resources available throughout the country. To this
end government allocates resources directly to
Ministries that broadly touch on livelihoods.
However, in view of the rise of the informal sector as
key in the economy, there have been numerous
challenges in terms of how the state (both central
and local government) would respond to this sector.
Local and central government bureaucracies are
schooled in orderliness, rules and regulations that
may be anti-livelihoods of the poor. With the
progressive informalization of the economy
government faced a dilemma. First, they did not
want disorder and wanted people to follow rules and
laws. Yet, there was a view that government itself
was also breaking its own laws in various sectors of
the economy as seen through the litigations against
it by entrepreneurs seeking claims to resources or
demanding services. Second, government wanted
people to have an economic foundation for their
families, and indigenization and economic
empowerment also meant tacit encouragement of
the informal sector. However, there was no national
framework for the approval of the dissipated
livelihoods activities in all sectors of the economy
and geographical areas, which presented a
governance nightmare for the state.
response, the government then tended to be
punitive to those in the informal sector as seen
through policies on “Operation Murambatsvina in
2005” targeting illegal structures mostly in urban
areas, including home industries, flea markets,
backyard rentals buildings, road side sales. This was
followed by “operation chikorokoza chapera in
2007” focusing on the small scale and panning
sector of mining. Then, the “price control”
machinery was put in place that though targeting
the formal business (especially) retail sector,
destroyed the product line of the informal sector.
Though government was implementing
constitutionally allowed rules and regulations, this
tended to throttle the informal sector that it also
wanted to grow to demonstrate the positive
outcomes of the indigenization and economic
empowerment policy. The halt to the state heavy
handedness came with the formation of the
inclusive government, introduction of market forces
and a liberal attitude that came into government.
This liberal stance, came from the reality that
economically people had become destitute as the
economy had grinded to a halt.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
36
G2. Local authorities The RDCs play a co-ordinating role of local affairs,
including the granting of permits and licenses to
entrepreneurs in various sectors of the economy.
They are charged with the formulation of by-laws in
guiding people in their work, and the commons ones
derived from the national statutes include health
and safety by-laws, environmental etc. In addition,
the local authorities collect user fees from
entrepreneurs be it as individual proprietors of
business of various types and scales of operations.
In turn the expectation is that local authorities also
provide services in the form of water, waste
removal, road maintenance etc. They are
complemented by central government and
parastatals in the provision of such services. The
unfortunate part is that revenue collection as
described above has not been matched by service
provision, which has irked rate-payers,
entrepreneurs and even farmers resisting to pay
anything to the councils.
Over the years the revenue base of the local
authorities had been negatively affected by the
economic structural adjustment programme that
promoted privatization of most of the authorities‟
functions resulting in a lack of a revenue base for
them. They further suffered from 2000 because
government interfered with their functions to deliver
services at highly controlled rates. The local tax
base (commercial farmers, service companies such
as banks, manufacturing, industrial and retailing)
was reduced as financial service providers pulled
out from rural areas after the land reform
programme. It is this context that explains their
inability to assist with providing better services to
informal sector business. At this stage, many are
simply collecting revenue for services not provided.
Developing the capacity of local authorities through
human resources, capital development and
investment in greater ICT capacity is long overdue.
G3. Community leadership supporting
systems Efforts at engaging in rural livelihoods depend on
community support at many levels and leadership is
critical. Leadership for development requires the
mastery of representing people when they demand
for better services, access to capital, development
of infrastructure and so on as part of getting public
services for their enterprises to succeed. In this
context, traditional and elected leaders have a role
to play. While the traditional leaders are the
custodians of the land, and are responsible for
cultural rituals, they equally determine how people
accessing certain areas that may have resources,
allowing for use of certain products such as trees.
The traditional leaders are there for key in ensuring
the sustainable utilisation of local resources.
Elected leaders should play the role of representing
local entrepreneurs in local authority forums such
as RDC, while also interfacing with both the Public
and Private sectors in service provision.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
37
WHAT IS THE WAY TO GO WITH ECONOMIC BASED
LIVELIHOODS DIVERSITY?
A clear roadmap for livelihoods diversity in Zimbabwe is required to help the poor and vulnerable move
out of poverty
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
38
H1. A people based approach to livelihoods
development In Zimbabwe, there is no single patent recipe for
livelihoods diversification. There is need for flexibility
and transformations that are commensurate with
the capacities of communities concerned. Engaging
in livelihoods has a potential to help the poor to
move out of poverty while also making a
contribution to strong communities. However, for
livelihoods diversity to work for poverty reduction
there is need to decipher local practices so as to
sufficiently know what poor people are doing by
themselves to overcome poverty or to cope with it.
Quite often NGOs and donors are entangled in some
chimerical vision that guides programme strategies–
– the latest trend, the newest model, the theory that
happens to be in the ascendant at that time.
Nevertheless, such programs tend quite often to
replace and displace local effort.
H2. Match demand and supply
Matching people‟s livelihood options to the market
is essential if people are to develop those livelihood
strategies to the point where they feel safe and
satisfied within them. Likewise, being aware that too
many people following the same employment or
income earning activity in one area can quickly
change market conditions in the negative. If
supported, the enterprises should be able to
generate local employment and improve local
incomes. Such enterprises should have gender
equity as a priority given that many women
participate in these enterprises.
F3. Capital and technical issues
Rural entrepreneurs have established their own
ways of raising resources for their businesses and
these ways require to be supported based on their
own ways, but in a manner that they can also be
attractive for financial institutions. While venture
capital development is one way to go, there are also
other areas such as micro-finance that can be tried
out. This means that development agencies can link
different lending groups to existing micro-finance
institutions.
H3. Enhancing partnerships and collective
action Creating partnerships and leveraging resources
from government, private enterprises, and
development agencies would be an effective
strategy for rural development. This will streamline
the problems of resources wastage as agencies who
if they do not collaborate may end up investing in
the same enterprises, which may not make an
economic sense. In order to leverage resources
Private-Public-Partnerships (PPPs) should be
encouraged as a basis for scaling up enterprises
through capital, skills and technical capacity
mobilisation. This cannot be simply done with the
current range of activities that largely are in the area
of reselling or being appendages of companies
providing services such as in the communication
industry for instance. One way in which rural people
can build capacities and collective strength for
enterprise development is through organizing.
Disadvantaged groups within communities can
derive residual strength if they act in unison.
Through collective action, without inhibiting
individual talent, they gain confidence, knowledge,
voice and abilities to regard themselves as partners.
Coalitions and alliances forged through marketing of
products that build beyond the local community and
enable groups to join with others sharing their
interests and concerns. It is such that they should
not emerge to alienate some members of the
community interested in the same resources for
equally good reasons as those who are participating.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
39
H4. Capital and venture capital for rural
development Rural entrepreneurs have established their own
ways of raising resources for their businesses and
these ways require to be supported based on their
own ways, but in a manner that they can also be
attractive for financial institutions. While venture
capital development is one way to go, there are also
other areas such as micro-finance that can be tried
out. This means that development agencies can link
different lending groups to existing micro-finance
institutions. There is a need to try out venture
capital that can be facilitated to enter into capital
venture relationship with the arts entrepreneurs,
initially handling all complicated post-production
activities but gradually capacity building and
handing over these functions to the community
entrepreneurs to manage as they gain experience.
We feel this is more effective than trying to make
livelihoods diversifiers simultaneously experts in
production, marketing and processing of
commodities and bearing all the risk. As part of the
micro-finance programme there is need to create
household insurance products which are generally
under provided in all rural areas but which we feel
are necessary to reduce risk exposure of rural
entrepreneurs.
H5. Strengthening development institutions Whilst these are critical in rural development, they
remain inadequate to meet the needs of local
people. In fact, state financial resources rarely reach
the local people to develop themselves as they are
usually used for the odd infrastructural development
(schools, roads, and clinics) here and there without
any meaningful change in the livelihood status of
the household. One key intervention is for
communities to get tax concessions/relief from the
state or that tax contributors (from the district
working elsewhere) have a percentage of their
contribution going to where they come from. It is
thus critical that there be organizational capacity at
government and civil society level to facilitate
community empowerment through livelihoods
diversification. Where this is not possible, then there
is need to lobby for policy and legislative changes so
that the poor are not marginalized from the spaces
and resources that they depend on.
H6. Facilitating learning and linking by
communities
Rural people can identify rural enterprise and there
is a need for capacity building to make their
enterprises viable and profitable. Therefore
providing people with new livelihood opportunities
may overcome an existing problem but does not
necessarily give them the capacity to adapt to future
challenges. Building skills to help individuals and
communities innovate in the face of future changes
in their environment is key to long-term survival and
growth. Building innovation skills and, more widely,
providing support for continuing livelihood
development is important. In terms of skills
development in livelihoods, there is little point in
building skills not in demand. In fact facilitating
communities to exchange is the surest way in which
communities can learn, as they can copy (borrow)
practical ideas that they can implement in their own
areas.
Livelihoods Diversity Study, 2011
40
H7. Influencing government policies Effective and efficient resources utilization will
depend on the collaboration between development
agencies and state institutions in ensuring that the
various interventions by the different agencies
complement each other in a synergized way. There
are a number of multi-stakeholder initiatives
involving different donor agencies, governments,
NGOs, the private sector and civil society
organizations doing more or less the same things all
the time and everywhere. The enterprise
development based on exploitation of local
opportunities and natural resources has largely
been focused on people than equally developing the
leadership capacity in government and traditional
leadership to provide support. In fact, RDCs at times
do not have the capacity to support rural
enterprises, yet stick to out dated bylaws and crude
enforcement mechanisms that have not changed
with the times.
H8. Livelihoods policy Local people should also be able to influence the
policy environment. This means that the governance
structures should exist and be of reach for local
people to channel their concerns to the highest
policy making institutions. Policy engagement by
rural people would ensure that they get the best
concessions (through policy benefits and resources)
from the state. The macro-economic environment is
critical in that it affords the community the enabling
mechanisms that support rural enterprise
development. A livelihoods policy that runs across
central government ministries should be central in
identifying the supporting and co-ordinating
mechanisms for a diverse range of livelihoods
activities so that there is minimal policy conflicts.
Key consideration should be how an enabling
environment can be created for people to exploit
local resources, how they can benefit from state
resources allocations, appreciation of the laws that
create the enabling framework for people to exploit
opportunities etc. Given that many livelihoods
issues are spread in many ministries (agriculture,
transport, youth empowerment, local government,
economic planning, SMEs, industry and commerce,
tourism, education and culture etc), it is a mammoth
task for ordinary citizens to know what takes place
in each of the line ministries. Development agencies
can be a portal for rural people whose access to
these ministries is limited due to a variety of factors.