living with an elephant: drug misuse, parenting & child welfare brynna kroll senior consultant,...
TRANSCRIPT
LIVING WITH AN ELEPHANT: DRUG MISUSE, PARENTING & CHILD WELFARE
BRYNNA KROLLSenior Consultant, ARTEC Enterprises Ltd
TWO YEAR RESEARCH PROJECT ( MARCH 2006-8) FUNDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DRUG MISUSE RESEARCH
INITIATIVE ROUTES
DISCLAIMER: THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE THOSE OF THE RESEARCHERS & NOT NECESSARILY OF THE DEPT. OF HEALTH
WHAT WE DID :STRUCTURE OF STUDY
Case record analysis of files of 28 children & young people on CPR where PDM is an issue
Interviews with children, young people, parents & grandparents
Interviews with a range of social welfare professionals from voluntary & statutory drug services, statutory child care & primary health care
Focus groups involving parents and professionals
WHY WE DID IT : RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
To promote the welfare & visibility of children with DMPs by improving inter-agency assessment & intervention
To identify the needs of children, young people & parents & obtain their views about services
To explore professionals’ views of dilemmas & challenges where PDM is an issue
To develop shared principles to inform protocols for good practice
THE ELEPHANT IN THE LIVING ROOM
The substance as a family member Living with an elephant Denial and the challenge to children’s
perceptions User/substance relationship as
family’s central organising principle Implications for attachment and
parent’s psychological availability
ABOUT THE CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE
42 children & young people interviewed aged between 4-20 yrs ( 9 under 10;14 between 10-14; 18 between 15-17 &; 1 aged 20 ; 38 clinical; 4 community)
26 girls & 16 boys living in both rural & urban areas- 40 white; 2 dual heritage
15 living with a parent, 5 in a secure unit, 14 in foster care, 8 with extended family
Majority of children were from single parent households & had to cope with a range of parental problems in addition to PDM (alcohol misuse, mental health problems, DV)
Significant majority of children had anger management problems, had been excluded from school and been involved in bullying, fighting
Just over 50% aged 15-17 & 25% aged 10-14 had used drugs &alcohol themselves, most at worrying levels
Parents /grandparents of 12 of these children also interviewed ;some sibling groups also included
WHAT THEY TOLD US: ‘HOWEVER BADLY YOU WANT YOURSELF TO BE NUMBER ONE, IT’LL
NEVER HAPPEN.......’ Drugs always come first with implications for
attachment & trust PDM generates a range of powerful emotions PDM & caring for children don’t mix – ‘Don’t do it if you
have kids’ Managing parental responsibilities was common Poverty and squalor caused shame & embarrassment Education often compromised, although school a safe
haven for some Life is full of fears – of losing parent /being taken
away/parent being imprisoned/ parent dying Life is often dangerous & frightening; witnessing
violence was common
‘I DON’T WANT TO TURN OUT THAT WAY’
Parents were idealised & excused, despite impact on children
Children worn down by broken promises, multiple disappointments, failed treatment or precarious recovery
Stigma attached to children of drug users in small, rural communities - ‘there goes the junkie’s kid- I bet she’ll turn out the same’.
Children afraid that drug misuse is ‘catching’ Children scared to tell anyone but desperate for
someone to notice Own alcohol/drug use as pain management/ way of
coping but also a way of connecting with drug using parents
‘YOU’VE JUST GOT TO CARRY ON WITH IT, HAVEN’T YOU?’
Importance of grandparents & close friends(&
their parents) as sources of support Importance of supportive professionals (social
workers, teachers etc) ‘What doesn’t kill you makes you strong’ –
keen survival instinct & desire to make something of their lives
‘I just thought “they can’t do anything”’ –if children have failed to ‘fix’ parent, can others succeed ?
Young people offered insightful, sensitive advice for other children, as well as important messages to professionals & parents
ABOUT THE PARENTS & GRANDPARENTS
40 parents & 7 grandparents interviewed + one small focus group
Sample ( largely clinical ) comprised 13 fathers, 2 grandfathers, 27 mothers & 5 grandmothers, living in both rural & urban areas–all white
Majority of parents were single parents with a range of problems in addition to PDM (alcohol misuse, mental health problems, DV) both in the present and the past
Two pairs of grandparents & one single grandmother were caring for their grandchildren full time after CYPS intervention
A significant majority of parents had experienced their own parents’ substance misuse & had had traumatic childhoods
Heroin was the main drug used with some amphetamine, cannabis and alcohol misuse
WHAT THEY TOLD US ABOUT DRUG USE & PARENTING :
‘I USED (DRUGS) TO GET BY, NOT TO GET HIGH’ Most parents acknowledged that drug misuse & parenting
don’t mix High levels of guilt & denial about impact on children Drug use as a management strategy for other problems –
domestic violence, mental health problems, loss Parents rarely asked WHY they use – focus is on managing use
rather than on any help /counselling for the reasons behind it Important to understand the ‘why’ of misuse – not just the
‘what’ and ‘how much’ Roots of use often in trauma, abuse or lack of emotional
support from parents in childhood or adolescence Link between parental use and their own parents’
substance/ mental health issues Drug misuse causes devastation in family networks, with
grandparents often left baffled, guilt ridden and helpless
WHAT THEY TOLD US ABOUT SERVICES: ‘(I WAS) NOT GOOD ENOUGH, NOT BAD
ENOUGH...’
Parents often fall through gaps in services due to thresholds for drug intervention & child welfare
Inaccessible services for drug misuse +poor rural transport militates against punctuality
Too many appointments & meetings undermines engagement & motivation
Importance of personality of worker, being given time to talk, workers being honest and straight and not blaming parents
Importance of key professional who orchestrates inter-agency communication
Grandparents/kin rarely get support when they take over – even when children clearly need help
‘THEY’RE TRYING TO CATCH YOU OUT !’
‘….they wanted me to fail….they wanted to take him off me……everything I said was twisted….’
‘You’ve got to be perfect – more than good enough’ ; ‘ you can never have any problems or admit to relapses or cravings’
Haunted by history - ‘they were judgemental & thought straight away that we were crap parents’.
Lack of consistency re. SW response – why do some people get to keep their children and others not?
Inter-agency working – not consistent More understanding of drug use required –
‘Solve the problems in the life & the drugs will drop off!’
Cases closed too fast- support needed beyond immediate recovery/drug use management
‘I HOPE EVERYONE LISTENS!’ ‘WE ALL NEED HELP’
‘I want someone to stop my mum & dad smoking heroin’ ( ‘Rhondin’,7)
‘The children just need to be taken away from it, really’(‘Mac’,16)
‘Social workers should definitely be more emotionally supportive – most children have only got their social worker’(‘Lizzie’,20)
‘Try to help the parents more’ (‘April’,17) ‘Look for the person inside the junkie’ (‘Annabel',
parent) ‘It’s so much more than the drug use that needs to
be addressed’ (‘Mary’, parent) ‘It’s important to see us as a family’ (‘Matt’, parent)
A MESSAGE TO PROFESSIONALS
They should be helping the parents….and help the children get through what’s going on in the house….they should sit down and listen to children who have been through it, instead of thinking ‘It's our rules, we have to do it by our rules’ & not listen to the children…they should listen to what the children think and what the children feel…..just because people are children doesn’t mean they don’t know what’s right and what’s wrong…..we know ‘cos we’ve seen it – they don’t know what it’s like living with someone who has been using…….. ( ‘Harley’,15)