liyi gu - cosmos · liyi gu ! (university of tokyo)!n. inada, p. gandhi, t. kodama, m. kawaharada,...

13
Liyi Gu (University of Tokyo) N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity College Dublin, 14/06/19

Upload: others

Post on 08-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

Liyi Gu (University of Tokyo)

N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima

X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity College Dublin, 14/06/19

Page 2: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

Why galaxies are much more concentrated than the ICM?

Why galaxies are much more concentrated than metals in ICM?

Why the cool dense ICM in cluster center does not suffer radiation-induced “cooling flow”?

X-ray Optical Kawaharada+09

Fe Mass in ICM / galaxy light

Radius (kpc)

A1835 RGS spec.

Peterson+01

Page 3: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

When galaxies interact with the ICM, vgalaxy ~ vICM_sound specific energy: galaxies ~ ICM Sgalaxy << SICM free energy: galaxies >> ICM

Energy flow from galaxy to ICM: -dE/dt ~ N π R2 n mp v3

~ 2×1044 (N/300)(R/10 kpc)2(n/10-3)(v/500 km s-1)3 erg/s

² Dynamical friction (Ostriker 99; El-Zant+04; Kim+05)

² Ram pressure stripping & wake (Gunn & Gott 72; Vollmer+01; Gu+13)

² Minor merger & sloshing (Ascasibar & Markevitch 06; ZuHone+10)

² MHD turbulence & heat diffusion (Subramanian+06; Ruszkowski & Oh 10; Parrish+10)

Page 4: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

reconnection

Hot phase ICM Cool phase ICM

Magnetic field Galaxy motion

Ø Member galaxies strongly interact with the ICM in a MHD configuration

Ø Heat flux transfers along

field lines via thermal conduction

Ø Galaxies fall to the center of potential over cosmological timescales

Makishima+01; Takahashi+09; Gu+12

Page 5: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

Ø All clusters (340, z<0.5) available with SDSS+XMM/Chandra Ø 70-90% complete relative to other catalogs (e.g., NORAS) Ø ~35000 member galaxies selected using phot-z (Δz~0.01-0.03) Ø Member galaxies are 80-90% complete at Mr<-21

(contanimation~10-20%)

redshift M500(1014 Msun)

Cl number Total mass (M500)

Page 6: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

X-ray Luminosity Function Optical Luminosity Function

Consistent with other results

Page 7: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity
Page 8: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

Radius (mpc)

Total Grav. Mass (Msun)

ICM density (cm-3)

Galaxy density (mpc-2)

Page 9: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

Radial profiles of all clusters

Radius (mpc)

Total Grav. Mass (Msun)

ICM density (cm-3)

Galaxy density (mpc-2)

Page 10: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

Averaged radial profiles for high-z, med-z, and low-z clusters; R500 and ρcrit(z) corrected.

r/R500

Total Grav. Mass

ICM density

Galaxy density

r/R500 r/R500

Galaxies exhibit a steeper distribution in nearby clusters.

Page 11: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

Galaxy number vs. ICM Galaxy number vs. total mass

ICM vs. total mass

r/R500

r/R500

Galaxies evolved to be more centrally- concentrated relative to ICM/DM, while ICM expands slightly towards low-z.

Page 12: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

² Evolution of galaxy-to-ICM profiles does not depend strongly on cluster or galaxy mass.

² Dynamical friction alone cannot explain this evolution.

Galaxy vs. ICM with low-mass cls.

r/R500 r/R500

Fdyn. fric. ~ -4πρtot(GMgalaxy)2 /v2

…with fainter galaxies

Mcl < 3 ×1014 Msun Mr > -20.9

Page 13: Liyi Gu - Cosmos · Liyi Gu ! (University of Tokyo)!N. Inada, P. Gandhi, T. Kodama, M. Kawaharada, S. Konami, K. Nakazawa, H. Xu, Z. Wen, & K. Makishima! X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity

²  Member galaxies have become centrally-concentrated relative to the ICM and DM from z = 0.5 to z = 0.

²  ICM slightly expands relative to DM though it keeps

radiating. ²  Dynamical friction alone is insufficient. ²  Galaxies lose kinetic/potential energy to ICM/DM by

1044-45 erg/s per cluster: a hidden energetic flow on cosmological timescale.

X-ray Universe 2014, Trinity College Dublin, 14/06/19

By studying the SDSS/Chandra+XMM data of 340 clusters,