:::l:.:.:l .::-:ii:1.9...
TRANSCRIPT
I,\I]'ED STATES DISl'RIC'I COURT
:::l:.:.:l_".::-:ii:1.9_::::.1.:i:".".."_....._..."-""RO\\ F E\TFRTlI \ \ IE{I ! ET \T. !
Plrintifis.
TIt[ \\'|l-LI,\Nl ]lOltRIs. El AL..
98 Civ 8272(RPP)
\OTICEOF
ltoTto:{
PLEASE TAKE NOTICI tl[rlpon ']re.nnlxcd
atlinlaiion olLcona.d
Ro\re. alirDcd on March 2. l0ll. dnd $c acconpdying Mctxn.ndlm.ft arv in
suppoi ofLhis motion. and rll pleadings h.d herein, plannilTLcdndd Row..r,/1,
i?. $ill o'c dlis Coun. bciitre lhe Ilon. l{obcfi P Pallerson. Uniled States Districr
Coui hdge. fof an orderittrsuant ro Rulc 60. itcl drd. ol lhe Iredehl ltulcs ol
Ci\ilProccdrrc errntilg. in the facc offraDd upon tht court, dcshnction ofiital
e'idlnce! and in the intcrcst ofjusticc: (a) r.licf itorn th.judgnrem in dlis acldr
b) !aca!ns and lenin8 !\ide rhe]udgm.rir (h) resro.rne 'he.ase
k) rcr,le \r.rus:
{c) rcf.ding ihe ncvly discovcred elidcnce to:1he (iiminal Divisior ol ll S.
Auorne' s Olfice. rh.Ii_BI. rhe Conrmiftce on Gricla].es oll]te Bodrd ol Judgcs of
rhe Sou$.mDistricr oINe* York and ihc n".$ York starcAppcllatc Dnirion.
Ftrsr DqramrenL. Dcpdrlflrenral DiscrPlinary Coonlittcc (the '.DlX ): and (d) and
such tunhcr reLief.sthc Honouble Courtdccms troPer
t .l.tlute u,dt peralt^ of pctjtutr thnt.thefottgoihq is truz.4hd 'onecl'
Marcb 2. l0 l2-r ' / .a -: ; l
j ) / t ! : :Li805 Slare Bddgc Road. Sunc lj0Johis Cfcck, Gco.gia 30097enu i I : turee nle rlai n(Llo l..oM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
::_"::T:',:T:":1":'T:____,.ROWE ENTERTAINMENT, E'T AL.,
PlaintilTs,
THE WILLIAM MORRIS, ETAL.,
- .9E.Cin 4272(RPP)
AFT'IRMATIONOF
SERVICE
AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE
I.leonard Rowe. declarc under penalty ofperjury that I have
served a copy of thc aftached:
l. NOTICE OFMOTION|
2, MEMORANDUM OF LAWi Tnd
3. AFFIRMATION OFL'ONARD ROWE
trpon the following pafiies on the attached SeNice List as indicared, lhis dav,
March 2,2012:
x
. JzzMarch 2.2012
5805 State Bidge Road, Suite 350Johns Creek, Georgia 10097end l : tuw e ente aitdeqolcon
SERVICE LISTIlII Charcs lhmprn Vl i l l r r E:q. l .ocb & l - .cb.LLI '>. l ,1 j ParkAvc.N.\r lork. \ \ l0 l i3: l l l$r . r9 l0:udi rumb.. :l2 l{)r-l{X)lr.lnx ll2.1Ol 1+)0:S f:Rv l-: D I I A tlsc ha. f. r@ lNb,..,tL Ckior\ , \ Cldck hnt. . Nl i r in. Phelp!& Phi l l ips l -1P?lnnesSqurre \ .wYorr. .N\ .10016: l : l l r6 l r 4l I I r 16.16) ,1r-8 94ll4fr\ -\'E?lvED Vl \ [email protected],xonl
.1. ! lath.$l .Poppl l l l .Emnc!.Cobb.$i i r \&K.sscnich.Pa. l5 l iR, j_drx!Srr . r .\csOnertrs LA.t0II:r5({ri3l |.10|.(jLr4)53I a 2l)i\ JtR\1ED VIAnlp@)ecwko.coni \ l i rha. lPZ*ci ! t l { l - l ieh& Loeb LLP.:145 P.rk^ve.. \ .RYorl .N\ ' . l0t j .1 2l2. l0r i l9{ '0 t l112 208158: fr\ Sl:RvED l'1:{ tt:*2i!@beh xapar. Morr.r P.uasl iav.crbr Esq..DLA I ' iper RudnickCn' caryLs LLPl2i l6 Alr . \cs rd.L N\.I 00?1) l a)\\' 2 r: 16.1 6300 DL A Piper Mntging I'ohntr P.t.r S. fantuI.oSERf ED I I A p!4L@rl4b!1!l!j4Lie!t!r!!I $?sl . ! R P.qel lL.q. .Hlr ton&Wil l i rn, ! .L l -P.200P.rkAv.nu..Ner\ i t [ .N\.10i( , { ' ) !owNE$ Wll lk, .Fatr&aaLhghLrLl l '>. iSTSerenthA!.r t rc.NcwYoik.N\ ' l ln l96099. l lSA T212 tl3 3264. F I Ll rllJ 9?6,f H utuon ,!. rl illiads LlanagnrE Pt4t Lta J. Sotto 212109 1040,
212 309.11u0...... sER\'I:D v IA: N 'owell@+illkie.con
8 Chnn'E Lrp.m.sNR Det l rn L,s LLPINY). i22l Av.ntr . o i l l reAnen.as \esYork.NY m?0.
.J!af .c)Lt ieJslerF-\qD!N.rBnlLanrrcLLPl io lathavc.\es\ i t rk- \Y. l lx) l9212159r l{150
I L37Gi : l : .dDlGr. . t \ / l { l / t r I r r ' l l in4 r l l l9 . ! lar i rspen!rdo.CnrJ.wi l l ram\.Paren! Fr iney.Lewis. j i l .Manu\ ' r raL.Watersid€ProlrsnonalB trildh s. Stuxn. Fl- .1.199:1 561 287 g160 lLRl LD flA Cary Wilians I'a,1ner ltt@wilieaa^.rM10. NlarkrILemn,t G3.y.williaorr.Par.rii l'mcy. Lr$is. \'lc M inu\. ct r '.NhleaLde Prolessional
Build'i g. S1Mn. IiL l4qq4 561 231 82(o Srlivlir l'I,'t 6a4 lt iUiaB Ponhet Utlltillietafl .onl l Man Roth CoLd.SNR DcnroD US Ll-P(NY)i2l lAleDue of the Anrel i .as N.sYork N\ ' lOO20.(2i2)193 3?01.ll2 r('3 63(lJ lal \;Rl'rlD }7^ nreoldlasoni.0s.!'sr!.!or]]l : wi l lanc campbrLl .Esq 6xry. \ l iL l ixnr- Prrent Fi f t rev.L.wis iv lcMadr(.{al ' . \ \nrer ide
Pruld\ronal A u'ldri!. \!iad. FL .1499,1 56 i 281 3260 vir StrRl/r, WA Adry \ritti'ns Ponntr
!reyillils!4,elttt A N D w i I I i a t 1 t. t 99 6 @n o L t o tfll l Douelas Lambtn.C!ry tilLixJns Parenri F nk! l-dq\ N1'rvlrnus
'r rl \\arc'sde Prolestr'iaL
B trirdrj-g. sban. FL 14994 56 t 23i 32.n) sfRl tD t IA Cz4' rvll iznr t'anns ll9villi!t!!4!!al4 lleler Cara'r. Loeb& rr.b..l45 PsrkAvetrue.New\ork. Nl 101540011 (2lll l4t 1Ildl
SERvED l-IA [email protected]
SrRVLD I Ia )It\,lrr@ dl..ott
- - ' / r
15. Nladi$. B Nl( le iLan.GaD.Wrl lLaN.PireDrl .Flnncr. lceis.VcMantrs.dr l .$ i reNdeftdesloialB trildi"g. Srten. Ft- .1.1991 561 . 281 8260 J-'tR! tD t'1,,1 6ary \lillianr Partner [email protected]"1l6 SekoriV Oary.Cnrt.$rillirnrs-Parenri I:idner.l-ewis.NlcManur.eral $:id6!de ProtssionalB0 Llding. SlMn- tl, .l.19lt t6 | 231 3261J .SrIlVfD vll C arf lfi iattt PanM [email protected]?. l r i . i rPHol l le ' .Crry. \ ! i l l l {nL.Pnrei t i .F innetLcEis.NIciv lafur.err l . \ \ . ters idcPntt$iotalBnildiRg.Snlan-Fl-.14991561 2al a2gi SERVEI, VIAGaT $illiafls Panttr lf@wiqi.!6.corll8 Jcf i ret 5. Klein. [ t i l .Cohhr]& luar-eer LLPINYc).767 Ff lh Avenue. l5d FIN.R York-\ ] lo l5r2 l2 I l0 30{x) f.r: r 2 | 2) 8:].r'l l,l8 ,SFRr'rn t,1'1 jcfle!.L!c!!!!qdrJ1ljr
l.r Jefiret;\. Fuisz. Llnir€d Star* Atorneys olricc.5outhe.n Dnkict ol N0w \o.k. one sr.A drew\t , laz, .NowYo.\YrO00?2123168tu0212816Gi7fx\SERVEDvIAi I lL&Ley;t fu l l lEl t t20 G.mld Nlaryol is.Manatt .Pheips&trnrpiPhi l l ips. l l . l55we{ol !nrpicBor lovard.L.sAieeles.(Aq\a;, 16,.r. i l0 I r 2 l{XlO DECEI\SED SERVED VIA Ctuit Malzr ea!t!!!!!!t!t@.!!2!!2 l Sanaor Frarkei . Fnnkel& Atrr in 's.210 Park Aretruc. NYC 10169: l l66t 5000S E Rv I: D vtA r:[!s!!t!!9!!!rLe!Lh44]!!422. Srevetr Nl i .haci l tates. l ladl t Conro! BieGre SlenJr i l ldEf&anrp: l layes.LLP I l2Mad60r. \ !cnue.\cwYork. \Yl00l62l2l8+a)1{021?784.6.{20hrJ^CIr t )vtA\hrvennhanlvr .ndv.orn2j Adam Dana Mn2n.rccrstseo.Srvage.Kaplotritz.wiil.& ltL.cus LLP(t x.Av..)6l)0L!\iiatoDA\ nu! \ r$ \orN.\ \ tm : 2 l , l . lo l r i2 l )ob.r ' , i . r \ srRvFDVr{rni / t r" " r" rcn' \ ' er ' '1
21. Brian S FBler. sp.m & lmes LLP.5l ltladron Arerue. \cs YorL. NY 1ml0 212 5l(l l30t)2ll i:10130llr\ SERVED VIA blrasttitrko n.coil
l i . Janr.sACohb.tdmerC.hhwhhs&K.set ich. l i15l 'ovdrasSte. t .str i re1950.NewOrl .ans. l -Ar0llz j01i31 il0l SERV!:D vlAjegClss\!.lo4?6 VikenrArdronjSrnra.KrteScholerLLP.. l25ParkAlentreN.{York.NY100222i23163l{ l )2D 816.8689llr SERI FD VIA _!!4a!a!t!4!9L!!!rrbek!.!9!42? Alan(l (dner.Btrchanar l!!c6ol1 Profesional Corp . ioo Collcgc Ro Ljst. Prnrcetor. NJ 0854)
6@ 981 68A0 sERvIiI) vIA [email protected]
-r0 JamesQ$dker-spers&anrp: lmesLLi .5 l l ladisotrAvenue Nes Yor l .Nt l0010.2l25l0l l l ( r1)212 5r0 r8orhr sF:RvEDvIA jygUllgLLeAzpa.
lL Mod'c,Pera-g| lavccabe.DI-At iperUsl-LP(\Y)125lArenueofthe,\mdri 'as.N' \ rYork Nr
Lan20 212 ]J5,1500 2r2 115.4501 St:tlval] v.r,l 44!!!t!9!!!L!4!.!!a!32. \l.lis\rC Rodnercu.Mor8ar. l-$,s & llockius LLP(Ner \ork).l0i PltrkAveiuc NewYoir'\Y
l0l13212l0!J.61942l2109621:lfax SER\ ED VIA mcrodrieuezc nw-lanLe\r F rom
l l . R.benE!\ ' rdDonnel l r .Lonrnr. f .Ahdo.( . lc . l t rg&Suleb'rg. l l l rv25r l rSreet idf lootNYClOml 2l2 tlJl ll??i SERvED VI;\ bobdonneLivri lomnretr com14 RichardC Priornt.Esq.Ll S.Securnies&ErchangeCommis:ion J {'ttrld FrnatrcialCentcr'lcw
lork.Netr York 10231-loll SCIlt?Ir t?A prinofir@[email protected]!
15. carl Rohe( Aron. Esq . 580 Prrk Avetruc. A F l28. NYC ]1INJ5 SERvtl} v IA 'aron@RCC
ctn
^' , [
UNITED STATXS DIS'I RJCT COTRT
::TY"'Ty:-:y"'::__",. '1 . .. 9a Civ.4212
(R"P)
NOTICEOF
APPEARANCE
ROWE ENTXRTATNMENT. ET AI-..
Plrinrlffr,
NOTtCtr] OF APPEARANCE
Pl@se 1ake nolice that i. Leonad Rowc, a plaintiff id this &rion'
blreby afi!€ar pro re and !ha1 all tuiure conespondcnce and papeN in comeclion
wirh rhis acdo! de ro be diteted to me at the addre$ indicarcd below
THD WILLIAM MORRIS, ET AL.,
March2.20125805 Stab Br'dge Road, Suite 350Iohns Crcek, Ceo.gia 10097e na i I : rc p e e n te.t4 i^@o l. co n
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
:::r:_Tr lTi:T.:tT:1T_,..____ .ROWI ENTIRTAIN}If,NT, ET AI-.,
Plaintiffs,
-agatnst_THE WILLIAM MORRIS, ETAL.,
98 Ci! 8272(RPP)
AFFIRMATION OF PLATNTIFF LEONARD ROWErJ,,I SUPPORT OF MOTION
l. LeoMrdRo*e. aftim unde. penahy olPerjury ftar:
l. i, Leo.ard Rowe. aft an iadividuall] naned plaintitlin rhe abotc
enlirled aclion, and.especdull) dole this Coudlo issue ar order: (a) lacatints
and se$ing aside drejudgnenq (b) rcstonng the case to acile $aru$ (c) reibning
rbe newly iliscole.ed evidence to:the CiininalDivision of U-S. Artomev's O$ice-
the F 81. ihe Comnitee onCrielances of the Board ofJudgcs oIlhe Sourhern
Di$ricr of New York ard fte New York State Appellare Divisjon. F i.st
Depanmeni, Departmeltal Disciplinary Commiltee (ihe DDC")r md (d) such
fuftherreliefas $e Honorable CoundeemsjNl and Popet:
FRAUD UPON THE COURT
2. In the interest ofjuslice. rhis Honorable Counnusl acl swiily and
poweitull) agdinstl|e oilce.s of the coun who have perpeftated an illegalltaud
againsl lhis tideral coun. and who have diseraced lhe rule oflaw in ihis ereat
nation, and by theirown action$ ha!eidvanced the improper redji.in8 ofConcen
promote6 because offte colof oftheir sknr.
3. When this casc was iDitiau] broughr belbretbis couft.1 lvas nora*are
ofdle depti and ellent ofrhe cor.uplion dd collusion thar m! o$n r onrels werd
r panl to in rhis case.
,1. Specifically. I wns only irforned oD Tuesday, Febru.y 7.2012,
$it my own attorneys trd committed , series ofcrimes.rd gross,ttorrey
etlical liolations in thh case.
5. Aftorney Marlin Roth Gold and members ofhk law tirm had onBoing
'neerinss with delendanri counscl, wi|]1ou ourkro$lede.- and conspned 10
conce.l lilale-nail evidence. which we. as plaintifii paid oler $100.000 lor 'lhis
cruciale!idence comprised ofdocunenls thal conlained thc word lriggef neany
.100 rimes which clearll dc,nonsrakd thc.acial dninls ofrhese defendants ds ii
relaredro rhejr corrmctual dealings with pla;nriffs. Had Anome) Manin Cold and
hjs co-conspir.Io6 nor perpelu.bd this lraud upon the.ourt b) their inlenlional
con.ealnent ol Lbese docuDenrs (fte e-majls) aDd olher viral eviden.e ofsri-|.usr
\iolarions (which was concealed hom bodr lhci.clienls and ihjs court).1 lruly
believe thar this Clourt would hale reached a diilcrcnl outcode on sunm.ry
6. MadinGold didlhese despicable lhings after charging de and olher
plaintiffs hore fia.lwo hurdred tbousad ($200.000) doilare Io'e naild'scove'v
ofthe delendants files.
?- Ai:er Altomey Manin Gold 3nd olhers had taken pmcticallv all o | lhe
mone! .€ceived in panial selremetls tbr the l)laintifii he lhen th'eatened Io
tunlrer sabobge my case by cominglo you, fie jud-qe in fiis cise and nteLe
disldaging .emark ind assenio.s aPolta Martin Gold said he would go directlv
to &e Judge 'ifnol allo$ed ro wltirdmw from the c,se '
8. while I was generally inibrned abou{ one }ea'ago thar m} case mav
have involred "inefecdvc counsel" and/or oiher ceiain utelhical attomev actioDs.
is wasn t unlil lebruary 7. 2012 thal l specificalll leamed $at 1he actions
constiluted violations ol various crimes
DESTRUCTION OFEVIDENCEvital Evidence Secreted From the Courtl
9- Altorneys Madin Oold, ttay Heslin, Richdd Primoff' Christine Lepera
and CarlA.on. after lakin-e over 5100.000 for e'Daildiscotery and cdnpellineus
io uair. palienrly, atrorteys Gold- Hesiin, PrinolTand LePera advised thal nolhing
hadbeenloundasaresul tof theema;lsedch Whenthis was reponed to me' I
could reu th Mr. Gold, Mr. Primotrand Mr. Heslin were no! be;n8 mlhftl bul I
had no 'proof at that l;me,
10. I fien asked lhar they please sendallofrhe enri.e e-mail sea.ch
.esults, *nicb weE Io be included inall tnditrss.n{i documems, to m.. t carefulll
examined cach documenr thatthese attomeys provided lo me and iound no$i'rg
that proved our position against the defendams. Havina sorked in dis indu$ry lb.
over2J yeaN at thal tim€. ud enduring $emcis rhat all Afdcan-Ahedces had
then }nd conti.ue to endure alongwirh the collusion tha!exisrcd rhen ed
conlinues to date, I tbund lhis to be inpossible b believe.
ll. Aboul two (?) weeks late., I w6 calied ro New York Ibr a meeting
withAnonrey Heslin. Whjle I waswaitine outside olhisofiicc I overhedd
Atomey Heslinon the phone discBsing me.tings wjth opposing coun*l in my
case whichhe had nor previously infomed us oi Aier goins into his ofiice.
Anomey Heslin r€ceived ltofter call od he tlmed his back to ne Ib. p.i!acy. I
then glancedon hisdeskand saF a file tlEt w6labeled "Rowe Enterlainment v.
william Moris, D-Mail rcsuhs". Ir was th€n ihal I obse^,ed the wo.d nigger"
was lined on the entire ftst page offe rcpon. Wh€n Anoney Heslin nnished hG
call.l asked h;m "whatwas thatl" pointing to the e-mailrcsulB report onhis desk.
Anom.y Heslin then trmed over the rcpon. in ny tace. dd told me $a. l wd not
supposed !o see that, '
12. I then asked the quesrion -WHy? since it penained ro m) car.
AuomeyHeslin lhe, got very angry and argumenrali!c wirh me. I then calted
Altomel willie Cary and lold his larv tim shar t had seen oo Anomev lleslin\
desk. Abmey Gary lhen asked rhar rhe e-mail rcpon be sent ro rhen for review.
But, imponanlly. I HOSE EMAILS WERE NEVTR SIN1l This is how only $c
rcpon rzs finall! ohained by $e plaint s. ButMr.ColdnorMr lteslinorfteir
frnn. despite my nuDercus requests for the adual documenrs(the stack ol emaih)
that conained the $ord niSAef oedl' 400 times. th€) alwars- ro lhis dale, hove
relused by requesr ro rum over property lhar rig| illy belongs ro me as a plainlitT
and ibrwhich we had paid over $200.000 ro obtain. Mi l{eslin md Mr. coid- and
orhers who had knowledee- .lqar_ failed rc rcpon fiis (thecmaiis) to la$.
en fbr!emedr AND the Coud.
13. I also subrquently leamed thlr A.tomeys ManinGold and Ray
Heslin had a pr!,vious rclationshipwith Dlle Head.lhe ln"House Auoner. ib.
Dcfendanr Clear Channel. Durin-e *clement di$usions with Clear Channel. lhe
Howard RoseAsency aswellas Montercy PeDinsula,I was always pressured by
Atrcme' N.llniD Cold and his iim losettle undet fie conrinualihreat of then
$ ilhdrarval t-rom theca.
l.l. Duringthe deposition ofCAA employcc.lvlr' Rob LighL. which wG
bein8conducted by Anome) CarlAfon. ofMarti' Cold s las fimr. Plainliff, Lee
King. while using ihe r.sr room du.ing a brcak in tne proceedings. overhea.d the
allome\s !tun \Veil Gorchr. reljing Mr Lighr rhar he would nol beasled *an] h&d
queslions iiom Mr Aon. Whcnever Iwoutd ask Auo.ner Aron ro ask deiendants
penrnenr queslrons. such as. e blacks give. the same opponunirt as whites, he
would.efuse to ask the requesred querdon whhour a co.t;onrarion. I k.cw rhe!
ftatour casc s?s being inrentionallv sabomged byAnomey \4ai1in cold and his
15. Ii is reprehensibie rhai rhese anorne)rs. rhar we.e supposed lo be
represennng ny inlcresrs, rerc actuall) engaged in rhe intcnlion.l sabdLagr ofnrr.
case bt sublcditr8 ourpositions and hiding key evjdencc from me and the other
plaintiiis. This ltononble Court,I respectfully $ubnit! MUSTvaclte tne
judgment and restore lhis case to the r.tive calendai
16. I have norv been made lirlly aware lhat $e e!.egious acts were- in
fact. Dot onl) acls ofgioss aliomcy misconduct. fiaud and collusion. bu thdt these
acls speciicauy consilule lhe coDnlission ofserious $imes. A Hf,ARINC ON
THf,SE ISS!T]S IS RIQUIRED, IN'THE INTERI]ST OF.ruSTICI.
Knolriog Crimes By Officers of lhe Coun
17. SpeciilcaU), when Anomeys Mudn Gold, Ray Ileslin. Richard
Primoiiand Chrisline l-epera. with their co-consp;mrors. withheld rhe evidence
(the dannin8emails) f.om theplaintitrs, thisCouG and law enforcemen! rhe!,
kroejngly co,rmined the.rimes ofconsp;ac), obstructioD ofjuslice_ misprison of
a lalon), tlter z//i?. Aid fiese afiorneys grossl] breached e$ical oarhs and.
obviously. vaious attomey di$iplinarv rul€sofconducr rhar mu$be tull!
in\ei igr led oy,Erc and tede,al at tome) erhi(" .ox, ,nkreei .
18. Specilicall). when thes€ sme adomeys destmyed rhe e-mailelid€nce
which Plaintitrs paid over $100,000 roobrain, rhry conmjned the $jDe of
destroying evidence. irrel a/d.
t9. Specjfically. when these same attomeys. !!ilh theconscious inpul
liofr diei. co-conspiFtors o! tbe deten* side otde table, cde into rhis Coun dd
lied. on the record. they commitled the $ime ol peQetraring a "li"ud upon this
Couit- fhey lied d;ectly 10 the Coun, and ftey licd by omission when they did
not produce to the Coun rhe damnins edails lhe} had i, lheir posse$io. and
20. Funher, sp€cilicall), rhe ero6 soughr 1o sway fcus .way lrom lh€
rhe.dgequnuryol e,nJih qhenAnomey Man;nColdand Rj) Hesr in. senr mcd
c$- thar i{ | opposed theirletrer. threareni.8 me riqht before sum
whbdmwal thal rhey would come to you and funher ebolage my cse. This
misconduct is also a crhne of co$cion and extonion, and w4 done while railing to
repon their knowledge ol misdeeds md crimes.
2l- I believe this Coun sbould be ournged b) lhe knowingly jnprope.
a$ions olmy lbrmeraftomeys fiat resulred in a despicable and calculaled fraud
perpemted upon m. dd this coun. k is norhinA shod ofreprehensibte and I
bclieveftalrhe Ll.S. A orners'Office, rlB F.B-l and rh. various atromey
disc;pli.ary mc.hanisds ofthe Stere ofNew york will undenake srd complete a
tull. compleF and impanial invesdgalion ofall who wer. invohed, in anl *q.
True Justice Must Prevail
22. The previous rulingthal was enrcred by this Coun singlc handedly
desroled pracricallyall black businesses thal werc dependenr oD the black concen
promo.ea 'or rherr Ivel \ood 'uch ds lrm(,us.de Lorlndrici. (arering .ompdres.
stagc hands. production cohptnies and orhers whom have -qone tokrupt bdause
ollhcdimjnisled opportunities wroughL by lhe inpennissible del€rmiiation ollhis
case on sunma4 Judgmenr.
wilh the manner in which this case was
23- My etfons in bringing tiis mane.has NEVER b.en ro deslroy the
music enlenainmert ;ndustry but ro r) and slifledenumerors jnstanc.:s of
conrracuai disparities d olher pemicious insleccs ofdisc mination. SADLY
bec.use of hos this est.nd.d, and r. the h.ndsofoneftical !trd illegal
acton, the wid€spre*d rcl3 of
M) tuLher se^cd prouJiJ In
l f . | \ . Ar) ,of I ,4 veJ6. ln I oob he t ldJ,r .Jrd ooqn h, . t : ,c or. , . r han,<, ierd!
oi Viehanr llShting forfiis country so rhat *e allcould ha!e a ch.d.e lo
experience lieeddo and libeny. leavin8 me od n\ mo$e. behind. I wrs 14 yea6
old ar rhe time. W;.eceived ren thousand dolla6 iiom the U.S. Army ibr iris <teaih.
I also rccciled a purple hean and a bronze sra., which I am lery proud ofro $is
day. NIy morherAnd I took our paymetrl liom the Amry ard p.oceeded rc rry and
purchase a bonie in Colunrbus. GA. {hc.e we livcd. Ar.he rnne wc were noL
allowed rc buy a hone in dre neighbo.hood ofou choice becaose ofour race. We
were only allowed to purchase a home in the black neighborhoods. Here we arc
Iodar sir. some lbrtl ti ve yea6 lare. wirh civii righrs laqs tidly 'n
pta.e and rhe
music indu$ry conrinues to operate underthe same discriminlrory policies oiLhc
pasl and ienorirrS the ci!il rights laws of ftis g.eat nation.
24. ln retrospeci, lhc iact lhat ANY purponed panial "selrlenrcnf' was
auowed wilhout$c ending ol the criminal and race-bascd discrim ination is
unthinlGble. Surelr. any aromey wl$ a sp€c ofe$ics $ould hare insured that the
imp perand illegal pracrice would end. The on aoin8 and currcnt st te o|
redlining.ould only resuh liom lhe arog.nce and greedofthose $ho improperiy
acled. kno{ing pe.haps tha! !he} would be proEcted by those similtuly btnr
towdd conuption. ThisCounCANNOl let this condnue. Duringlhis lirigarion.
rhedeLndana. becau* oi rheireogancr', ne\cr made dI a emp.ro*nlc&is
case orro mrct us half$ay on the problcms that surrou.ded $is lnigrtion. hhd!
never been m) inlention to deslrol this 'ndustry
in any \.!. But I thoughr rhlr we
sbould h0ve becn comp.nslted for the nd) ldrctlatourC;vil Righrs had been
viol.Gd. I also l-elt that we should have been giren an €qu.rl opportunh! ll'
contract withoul regard to our mce and to beemploled in ftis induslry on fie same
terms and conditions d allothers. D@snl1his Cou.l. tire leeal p.oilssionand.
indced. allgood people owe it to iuru.e gene.arions lo in$!e ihar equalopponunity
exists tbr allin the United Statcs ofAmerica?
25. lt lhis Coun deni€s u) pan of$is molion.l bcliele thal ii lvould
onl! be condorine rhe u.e(hical dd iUe8,1l behat ior ofth. arbnEys in $is ca*,
b) lpproving ol thcir i-.aud upon ftis coun of lAw and allo$ing fie rcdlining oi
ente.uinmenr p.ornoters based solely on the color oftheir skin to continue.
2o. lhe onEuine ond *nrinlou" hdd"hip lha' ie dnd m) orh(t
colledgues havc endured hss beed su w.enchirg. eDorioidll) d.!inn,g and
economicall)- delastaringand it is verf diliicuh to rhinklhxl itallhas happened
because of traud, collusion, attomq misconduct and $e impermissibie 'weiShing '
ofthe evidence lhal was pre*nled in d'js ca* on sunrm.rvjudgmerr.
27. All th3t I ever wanted was a chalce 10 senle this cae: on rerms rlar
wtre liiif, just and impanjalso that ny litmily ed I. lnd rhose ofthe orher black
concert prcmoreE. couldmakean honest livinaat lhe only cER md prci-ession
thar we havc eaer known. 1
o@nbitu, ,eordlarl ol rh. .al* .f ,hzir s*in.
!8. I kn€w justice was nor s€n ed
asked to ily rc New York for a meding on
of(he injlsdce $as made cl.ar ro ne.
in this cas€ but il wasn\ uniil I was
Tuesdan februa.y 7, ?01? thar the deprh
29. Prcviously. I sal ifl the Honorable Judge Patersoo s counroom and
witnessed iiNr-hand as .justce unfold€d. I winessed lhis Coun $dy Iide and iine
again, that the detbndanls r€eded to rnle this case. I can also rcmember this
Court slating, in open court, lhat lhee was obv;oudy some monkeying around in
lhis indusrry". This Coun als sa;d thal with lhe evidence that had b-<n prcs€nted,
that the Coun did nol sec how they [1he defendmts]could !.evailwift ajury' The
Coun conlinued to plead wilh dle defendanb ro settle- I aho wsted the
deiendants to make som€ sor! ofan€mpi .o settle rhis iegal bante so ihar I. alo.ewrth hy colieaaues, could continue in rhe only professioo tbat we kne*.whicb
wouldailow uslo tal€ care ofou. fanilies and loved ones, dd provide a basis fo.
need chsge so others would nol be similarly discriniEred aSainst.
30. Sittine in Judge Patiesont coun oom thoughout the many yeds of
this leftme feelin8 p.oud ofmy couffry's system oltaw. Bul lhen sobethiry
happened. And ir wasn'1 until February 7. 20 I 2, thal ir was made ctear !o me what
had. in f&t, happened: that there was a se.ies ofknowi.g ittegal acls and arcssattooey nisconduct by inlolved attomeys against me, fte orher plaidtifts, and the
rule oflaw- and s out-lined above-
A Hearing otr These Issues is Required,ln the Interest of Justice
31. I p€X formyselfand all othe6 similarly situaled, thal this Courl took
inlo the deplhs of ils hean and .onscienc€ ed fairly undefiake an impa.tial
elaluation ofthe basis upon which the instanl molion to vacate, set aside and
restore is premised and ftal lhis Court place lhis matter back on iis docket ibr
adjudication, and fo. the other relief.equested.
12. I ask rhis Honorable Courr rc rpstore myfairh in rny
in rhE greor codnrll s dle oflaq. This Coun mdsr
fie inlolved atbmeys onlheirmisdeds- g.oss acts thar leave in place the
disgracefulp.actice ofpromoler redliningbased on $e colorol a person's skin.
34. I rm rnfomed that fiese aturmels have violald \anour anorney
di$iplinsr-v rulesofconduct. I believe this Honorable Coun is obligated to rcport
ilrese atomeys to the staie elhics comminee dd to the U.S. Southern Districr of
New York anomeys eihics commin€e as *ell.
3s. I am infomed thar it is acnme (nisprisof, offelon))A@I1o repon a
crime, and rhal is exactly what herein involved attorneys did when ihey reNaired
silenr when crnicalevidencc was *crcled dd when rhet all chose NOT ro r€port
trhar they knew cxisted (he enrail evidence) to the Civil Righ6 Division of lhe
U.S. Arbme) s OIIicei
36. I am infomed thar il isa.rime to desrcy elidence. and $at is exacrly
whaiManin Gold did. wnh othe6. when he de$royed the maptisl con{aininA the
ll9 emailuses ofthe words nissel'and coon'and orhcr.eferences tothe
redlining ofne ard o&e. black p.omoFrs beause oftle.olor oiour skjn.
37. I belielelhis c()ult has an obligation 10takc allapprupriate action.
includine lbmally rcpon such conducr rc la.iousethics comdiuesand to Law
Enforc.nent, and lad confidenl thal Justce s'illsoon p!e\iil.
18. I am infomed that it is a fiaud upon $e coun shen a person- and in
this cdse it was nufterous attorneysi' tirils to br'ng ro the Court s anentio. the
miscooducl of anothe. anome). thal happenrd in lhis ca$ whe. $e lttoftels
who knewofrhe secredngofrhe email e!idenceand tailed to intbrm the Cou.I ftat
slch rctons had happened in a lbdenl.oun ofldw
Frauds Upotr the Court Murt Be Reported By the Court toAll Appropriate Attorney Ethics Entities
39. The above liauds upon ftis llono.abte Coun MUSTbe tbnnauv
rcpo.ted by this Courr I b€liele this Honomble Coon will iulfill its obligatios ro
.10. I pr.y that lhis Horomble Courtwill stand up to the iueg.l rnd
imprcp€r acriotrs of those *ho would dr.e d€f.lud a cood of kr o.
kooritrgly$offal oursyrlem of hsr I tru.t this Codrt *itljoio tte
courageori m€mbers ofthis nation's federal bench as in:
t.) I)istrid Coud Judg. Michael Mills oi O\lb.d Mi$isippi \ho. in thc MasnJ
Norlin publiccoruplion csc. boldl! depaded lion s.itcncnre guid.lines dd
rcspoDdcdr{' rhe grecdl lbm{public oflicirl h) sa)ii8.
"adlok destroled theloith ofth. people in ,hei. govenrcnt."
(b) t.r.S. Diskicrcoufl Sennrr Judge Neal B i!Ac6. Jr. Nho brrutcd lured artomct
Dic\ir Scrue_ls ,nd said.
-The jBtice sfs/eta no.le lou a .ich nnn, I et !'ou ottnpte.l to conupt it. "
{c, Ihe iloror.ble l.nrsrlvaDj. LI.S. Dk'ricr cdun Jldee litlsin M. KosiiL.
$ho bnvel) r.j{!cd ! plea rSrccmcm in $e i:rbla' c,r, scandal.
IN TIIE INTEREST OF JUSTICE,
A HEARING ON THESE ISSUES IS REQTJIRED
CONCLUS!ON
WHEREFORf,, for the above rcasods and in the inrcer ofjusricc, ptaiiriff
Leonard Rowc rcspectfully rcquests iiar rhe flonomblc Coun mter an ORDER:
nrc undenigned decldes udcr lh. penalty ol perjnry lhar h. is. t'ldintiflin rh..bo!c actiod,$d he has r.ad rhe above dnd rhar rhe info.ndrion contahed hdin ir tue and comcl l3 U.5c. \ l7 l |6 i l3U.S.C I 1621.
Respecrfllly submincd.
M!rch ?.2012
Sening 6ide thcjudgmenr in this cdei
Orderin8 that the case be .eopcn€d and restofed to thc carcndsr asAn active case and ftatjustice be prolerly adminislered undcrthc law:
Referirg th. n€sly dis.ove(\l.viddc€ ro: the Crini.al Divisid ofU.S. Attomey s Ofiice the Comminee on Gnevames ofthc Board ofJudges oflhe Southem DhrictofNew Yofk and to the Ne\r YorkSlate Appellate Division, Firsr DepartNent. Departmcdal DisciplinaryCoonntee (ft . _DDC")i.dd
0ftnting such funher relief as th€ Honorable Coun deems.ju$ and
DECLARAIIO\ UI\I'ER PENALTY Of TEII,'URY
d.
5805 Srare Bridge Road. Sune 350Johns Creek, Gcoryia 30097e ntuil : rcweente oir@tol. con
-.-,J-:,-LL.-o;rd Rowc
UNI'TED S"TAT'DS DISTRICT COTJRTSOUTHERN DISTRICTOF NEW YORK
ROWf, ENTf, RTAINMENT, ['I'AL.,
Plaintiffs,
'againsf_THE \{ILLIAM MORRTS, E]'AL.,
98 Civ. 82?2(RPP)
!N]!OD!Cr!ON
I . i.eonard Rowe. p,, ie and as an indiliduallr namcd plaintifi in thc
abole entitled action. respectfull) subnitsthe hefcin lvlenorandrn oi Law in
Suppo ol I is motion. pursu.nl to Rule 60. itcr a/i4 tbr an orde.r (a) \ acat'ns
and sefii.glside lhe iudgmert; (b) restoring the case toactive status: ic) relering
the newly discolered e!idence ro: the Criminal Dilision 01 U 5 Atbmer's Otn.e.
rhe FBl. rhe Conmiltee on Grie\ances oflhe Board ol Judges of the Soulhem
DisriclofNe$ York and the Nerv York SlaleAppellatc Division. Fnsi
DepanmenL. Depanmenbi Disciplinary Comnitiee 0he DDC- ): and (d) such
lurther.eliel ds the Honorable Coun deemsjusl and prope.
-------x
2. Noe beJbre the Honorablc Coun is a seies ol newlv reveaLed
c\ idence lhattlrongl) cortinues the * idesprcdd pracLicc of the .edlnring oi
Conced Promoters based on the colofofthei. skin
3. PlaidtiffLeonard Rose, appea.ins now in his own indjvidusl
capacity, originally brought ftis acdon with other Aliican-Am$ican Music concen
Promotcrs. The filingagairsl the defendants aileged va.ious cau*sofacrion
ircludinS. bul not limited 10AntiTrusr Violations, CivilRighrs Violations undef
.r2 U-S.C. l98l md orhe. claims for rcli.f.
4. Two )ea6 afle. ol?largument. ad after ext.nsive di$olery and prc-
lrial moton pracdce, this Honorable Coun Srdred sumna.y judgneDr lo $e
d€lbndan$. The Coun s Order lailed to include my m.nlion of the derogalory
utilizador ofrhetenrl "niggers (which $'as found in |lte defendanrs william
Moris Aeency and CAA s €-mail Kords some 3.19 rimes), coons - and odEr
blaunl evidence of racial discrimination by defendants tha! has ben and continues
10 be directed toward plaintiffand others simildly situated. Additionau), the Coun
Ordtr did not nenlion substanrive d@um€ntary elidence. consisling of over 2000
conlmcts which showed fte systemic d;sparities inconracdng between plainlitrs,
who are all Af.ican-Amencan and memb€rs ofaproteted class, le6us 'while"
concen pro'noreG in lens of tlvorable l.ms e{ended lo white" concen
promoters ed said rems and condilions ar. wholty dcnied Afican_Ame.ican
concen prmotes in clea. vjolation of&e temsof l? Ult('/9a,/.
5, Il isofextreme imponance and concem to nore thal white the Coun
weighcd .eflain evidence dunng rhe sunm.ly judgmenr phac of lhe c4, $e
Couri corlld not have conside.ed the actual e-mail records becausc ofthe inproper
actions and misconducr by cerrain involved anom€ys In shon, fte evidenc€ emaik
we.e inprcpedy kept from fie Coun.
6. Plaintifi brings lhjs mo.ion as he hd only Nently teamed tbatrhe
acls ofmi$onduct that.ranspired i. dris case were required by law lo be epo.red
to ftderal ofiicials by inlolved auomeys. Each and €very involvcd indilidual wirh
a law dearee tras aware ofahe egrcgious injustice occasioned by rhe perpe$ation of
&e tiaud upon the coun cdnc€ming$e hund.eds oteDails. and all ofrhose
"ofilc€rs ofthc coun" failed to properly rcpon thes€ matteB according to civil ard
criminal laq and a variety of slale and lideml anomey ethics rul€s -
RILIFFUNDFR RTII f , 60
?. The general purpose ofRule 60 "... is to strike a prupcr baldce
bctwen rheconnicling principles thar litigation muslbe broughl lo an end and
rh:rtJuslice iru51 be done.'Bllsblrr v. 571FJlc. & lllqllffe
F.]d976.977( ldCir . l978). lhe decis ion ro granr or detrr ret ie lpursua ro
Rule 60(b) lies in Lhe $und discarion oflhc rrial coun guided b,- .ccepred
legal principlcs applied in liehl ofallrhe relevant cir.u,nsranccs. - t'trited
!tal9!l!Er44!d92. I j8 F. Supp. ld 188. l9l { D l)el. 1001 ) (quotinA Ross v.
Mragq!. 63 8 l:.ld 64't. 6,18 (ld Cir i 98 I ). Ru le 60 piovidcs . meehen isn lbf
cxlraordinary.iudicial rcljeflrlailablej only il ft. hoving pan) dedonsrrares
exceprionai ctcumslances." Ruorolo i. citv of New York. 514 F..ld I84. l9l
lld Cir.:ooii) (inlernalquotation marks oniLtcd)(sec also Paddioqtop Pannes
v Bouchard- l .+ l . ld l l l l . l l l l i :dCir 199,r)) . b l e l is l l ingoncornore of
Rule 60(b) grounds lorreliel tiom judgnent. \'atr Skiver!: tlnited Srates,952
f.2d l : .11. l : .1.1-,1.1) ( 10" ( ' i r l99l) .
AN TJLTRA VIRf,SACT RESULTS IN A VOID JUDCMENTUNDER ! 'RCP60(8)I
rj. FRCP 60(b)(,1) pennils ! i{ured patu 10 seek rcliel liom ajudgmenr
o. o.de. when the j udgneni is void. Plainriil respecrtu ll) conlends thar rhe
Coun wds de&auded b) inlolved auorneys qhen rhe court'weighed lainted
.vidcncc.lhus resuhing in an ,rra uer ac1.. Gross * Rell. ctal,5E5 I'.ld 72
(l'! Cir :0091e\en rhougn he \ould srill be peBon.lly imnrune corsislenr wirh
tr5 l r S i lo i5b- i? 48 S ar l0 i )o
A Pf,RPf,TRATION OFA FRAUD UPON TlIE COURTREQUIRES REINSTATEMENT O}' THE CASI
tTNDER FRCP60(a),1
9. The l"! Ci.cuir Coun ofAppeals has held thar"lidud upon rhe coun"
consisrs of fiaud pcrpc.E.ed by oiilceB ofthe cdurI so rharjldicial ft"chinery
cannol pe.fo6 in usualDanner its inpanialLast of.iudging..scs presentcd ib.
5i t-.Ed.ld ii I ( 1978). his iudgmen! in $is case. fte order on summar)
judgnent, wolld bc void. Scc senerallx Ctesr_lrjlclldal, 5 85 F.3d 7: (:d
Cir 1009) and ljRCP60(bX.l).
Tnnraero. lnc. u La lu.rz, Ad Bolici!!!. :{ F 1d l< 7, ao I ld
( l inron srrer lood ( ord. . :54 B R. j : l { :000): ( i l t l ron r . IundruLLo. 860 I
i . : lo fRD 7l ( l0ul) . Crtskiu Der€ lnnmenl.
, l8o F. Supp. l l l09l :001).
5 t8. . .n den,ed. 5:o t \ l l . ro. l lq \ Cr. :0: : . l+1. I Fd rd I ' r i . : ' loorr :b- Ie
:d556 (1988). shich held that u.aud upon the .oufl ' s amntins Eliei iio final
judement, as disringuished Fom iiaud upon an adleNe pany. is linned to lnld
\hich se.iousl) rtlbds integrit) olnomalproess ol ddjudicalion Acco.d.
10. This Coun h6 inherenr
thal fraud has been Petttrated uPon
!acdrc lls o$n judEnenL on Foot
ofcrrnel. 20 F. Supp.:d 630 {1998}, Levirip { HonbtrFer,912 F. Supp.508,
am.med. l07t.id3(1996). In independe a.rion ro er asidejudgmcn. based on
Aaud. misconducr, or fraud upon rhe coun, plaintiflmusr oemonsFa.e an absence
of plaintifl's own iault. neglect o. carelessnes. yeld!td1"5.. 8.{5 F. Supp. 72.
st imed 70l. . ld I (1994).
u. I1b6 ben held thar whenananomey misreprcsenK or omiE malerial
lacls roa coun. o.acts on c]ienf!peiuy or distortion of rvidence. his conduct
ha) consuure thud upon the coun. :tr i ,6 l B.R. r00 r .app€al aft€r remo'j, 85 B.R.9?0 (1986). The Fedenl Pro.edures govem rctjct'
iiom judgment due to f.aud, mis.epreseDktion. o. orher misconduct ol adverse
partt applies ro bolh inrentionaland uninrendonal misreprcrentarions. DiPirro !.
!J5., 189 F.R.D.60 (t999).
12. haud upon the coun hd been defined by
that species oft€ud which dcs, or a$empls Io, defile
perpetRted by oRiceB ofthecoun softar thejudicial
th. usualmamd ils iftpanial lask of adj udsine cases
l:deral courts (o embEce
machinery canoot perlbrm in
1115 { loLi Ci i 1985),Ser ltdlos!-LldtsLsts$s, 761 F.ld
K€nnerv. c.I.T-- 187 Fld 689. A fraud upon de coun makes voidfie orders and
judgmen6 ofthar couri.
THE COURT CANNOT "WEIGH" TAINTED EVIDENCEFROM A FRAUD ON THE COURT
PERPETRATED BY INVOLVED ATTORNEYSINASUMMARY PROCEEDTNC
13. Oneofthe principal components ofrhe insra morionrcucalc,set
sideand.estore, is thar rhis Cou.l, unlnowi.gly admiLted "tai ed evidence - d
inpenn issible 'weighing ' of all fte evid€nce in $is case in violarior ofrhe law
&s 'Conclusion ' of Jaiuary 5,2005, Orderon Sur,rmary Judgment.
14. Ona summary judgmenr motion. tbe coun is no1lo weigh lainted
evidence. &e, e.s.. Ards!4r.di!r!!&l&1,jl!.477 U.S. ar l5s. 106 S.Ct.
ar )) ll: lJril3d-Sl!lr!-v.8'rl[. -id f.Id o3J. b41 (:d ( it loolr: D!n3-bllr-!.
\tihdsor h.ks Bord or Fim coFmi.<ione6. El4lJM. 58 {:d Cn.la87}.
llzi-:l (ld C;r1994). The draNitre of inferences and the 6e$ment oflhe
credibilirt offte wimssses remain within the provincc ofthe finders oilacl.
15, tn rulingon amotion for summaryjudgment, the district cou.t is
required to dnw sll fact!,l iniercn es in tulorol and t ke:rll faclual ,ssertions-
judenen'. S((, i s. $ftI
nlt tointel eiden,e- tnrhelight mosl tbvorable ro,lhe parry opposi.g summary
ihertr Lobbr, Inc. . 177 l l 5. :+1. :55,1! ! l
P.aruce pE jh.(r l . ar 50-45 (2d er l la86)
F.id 1051, 1061 (ld Cir 1995). Tbe funclion ofthe disr.ict court in considerinB the
morion lbf sumrnaryjudenent is nor ro resol!e dispuled issues oftaclbuonl) to
dcrem ine wheiher thcre is a genuine issue lo be lded &4. e g , Aldsrsg!-L
S..r :qLr:.i.lj-l4,ol ILo d u ( ru8o): Bpd!ie!s!-!...lcio-dl!q!&4. l:
:177 U.S. at 25t . 106 S.Cr ai 25l l -14: Erstmrn Machire
:5l l l t r t ln i led Starer v. Rem.u I rdjil.
co. { tjpitcd strles. E4l F.2d 1169,173 (2d Cirl988). Asscssmen$ olcredibililv
and choices bcrween confl;cring versions oflhe evenb arc matte6 ibrthejury. nol
for fte cou.! on summary judsmen| See, e.ts.. Fed R Ci! P 56(e) 1963 Adlisorv
477 t .5 rr :55 100 S.Cr dr
6.14 (2d Cirl99,1)1 6 Moore's Federal
16. lt is not thc province ofthe coud itselfro decide whai inttrences
should be dra*\ especialiy $hcn ibc coon had llntled cvidence Presentcd to
(our b),n\ol \ .d atrorners &e- t e :16 l.
1 l F. ld aI lEr i t there is any
.vidence in rhe r.cord iron an) source trom which arcasonable illerence could 6::
drawn in ftvor o i the nonnoving part! sunmary i udgm'm rs nnproPer, see e g l
t t
. l i l F ld rLl l i Bmdr r . To$n of
( . lchesrer.80i t lJ l0 i . ( ld cir ta88l.
17. An] rleighiDg ol ztrd,k/ cvidence isrhe prerogltile olrhe linder of
i ; . , rJr ,n er<.( , 'c ror 'n( .oL r or sumn?rt tuo;neni ( ' .1S. tnr ,"Lar. tnc.
. : js I jd-aE.r0 r l t^ | , ( i r l06r ' -h. -u i+ i , 'gv. Morton l'oods.lnc.,
ui cd elidence in ftis case hy the Coun on sum'har) jud-erncDt constilutes a iiaud
upon ihe Court $hich nust be corected. in the intet€sloijuslice. and as a natter
TqE AITORNf,Y MISCONDUCT COMMITTAD IN THIS CASE WASREQUIRED TO BE REPORTED TO TEDERAL AU'THORTTIES
I8. l8ll.S.C.21: prohibils the deprivaiion. under colof ofla\, oi d righl,
pri!ilese o. immun:ty thrt is protected b), tederal lawand is.rininaliy phish.ble
in a dumber of$ays by ltderal olllcials. I E tj.S.C. 2'll Prchibits lhe conspi.acy
bel}een rwo (l) or nrore persons ro !iolate. indmidare or harass4othc. in the
exc.cise of the,. lidcral .ign6
t9. In. manner in which rhe idsum case preceded, ir was onl] recenll,
revealed to $e hercin movanl, underuco.es the parricipation ol in\olved ditornevs
ro deprive rlainlitlofhis rlghls p.oted€d under federal las.
20. This Court, becaur
prclented liorn Eking necessary
it was defrauded b) membcrs ol the ba! was
action to stop lhe pemicious raciSm thal
pemeates the live concert promolion busidess ofthe entertainment industry in
21. When fte opponunity presented itselftlnough lbe auspices ofrhG
lawsui!. for five (5) yed, dris Court indicated that lhe defe.darrs would i:re
insunnounBble obstacles to survive the scrutiny ofthis Cout dd thejury
Unfortunaiely. the Coun was defmuded, andjustice was denied.
22. The time ha come for th;s Hono.able Court and a jury to see the real
e\ide$e, tfu-utlalzla!fuzidc!!8. Finally, ihis Honorable Coun and ajury has the
oppoltunity to considerthe plethora ofdocumentary evidence of Ecial disparity in
contractual !e.ms a.d conditions, which clearly violate the leuer ed sphit of42
u.s.c. 1981.
23. lt isnowiime ro conecrthis injustice by vacating and setting aside the
smmaiy judgment order that was entered in this matter basd on a iiaud upon rhe
coun by 'nvolved
arbmeys- l!h respectfuuy submitted thatthis case be added to
the docket for adjudication accordins ro law dd !o allow the jury, as the finder of
fact, to make their deteminalion based on ihe fac$, rhe law qnd the !!lbi!]lgl
'Justi.e musr satistv fie appea.ance ofjusrice. Levire '. lJnir.d St ies, 162 t).S.
610.810 s. cr. l0i8 ( t960). orbn- udred stat6. i . t8 u_s I1.75 s. cr. 13,( l95l). As it prcsendy stlnds. the previous order on sumary judgnenldoes nor
have the -le* , the feel or'1he appeearce' ofjusdce ha\ i.g ben p.oq€rl,
sen'ed inthis case. Due process compeis a iln and impaniallribuoalfree from
fraud. bi6 or prcj udice. lts,&lsriuo, 52 I f.:d 842 ( 7rh Cir. I 996). Plaintif was
cleady depriv.d ofduc p@ess in the previous pceedings before this Court when
a lfaud was pui upon lhe Honorable Court by cenain involved attomeys eithe.by
any one adomey s deliberare illegal&6orby d improper silencemd lirilurclo
repon such conducr 4 required.
2.1. I he United States Suprcme Court has reafiimed the princiDal thar
2s. Anomeys Manin Cold. Ray Heslin, Richard Pr;mofi dd Christine
Lepera. wirh rheir co-conspi.ators, witbheld fteevidence (the dmnine emailr)
from $e plaintitTs.Ihis Coun, and law enlbrcernent. they knowi.gly commined thc
crimes ofconspi€cy. obstruction ofjusticc. misp.ison ofa felony. irrer d/ia. And
the involved "officeB offie coun grcssly beacbed anomey cthical oaths,
"Concealmcnt ofcrime has been condemned ftrouShour ourhisrory" ar4,E6r,s c
l/al?s. 408 tr.S.665. 696 (1972).
CONCLUSION
WHEREFORf,, for thc abovc reaens and in the inte.esr ofjusrice, Dlaidriff
Leonard Rowc respftftlly r€quests rhat thc Hono€ble Coun flts s ORDER:
Sc[in8 asidc the Judgnmt in this qsj
Ordcrjrg fiat the case b€ rcopcned aid resror.d 1o rhe calcndr asan eiiw ce ard tbatjusticc be prcperly administcrcd ud€! rh€ law;
Itefening thc ncwly discovorcd ovidenceto: fte C.iminal Division ol
U.S. Anomcy's Ofiicc, thc Co|midee on Cricvanc€s oftlc Board of
Judges ofrhc Southem Districl ofNew York and to the Ne\r York
SrareAppcllalc Divisiotr, Firsl D.panmml D.panmcntal DiscipLinary
Comnirtcc (rhc "DDC ); lnd
CBntins such tunher rclief [J the Honomble Coun dccms just md
I d.clare snder p.nal.r ofpcrj.ry that theloretotna is ttue on t.ar.ct-
March 2,2012' , 1. ,12
L6al;n*-5805 Srat€ Bndge Roa4 Sdile 350Johns Creek, Ceoeia 10097ehai|: tuwent rt i^@oLcon