local debt collector to pay $1_75 million

7/28/2019 Local Debt Collector to Pay $1_75 Million

1/3

Local debt collector to pay $1.75 million

By CHRIS SERRES, Star Tribune

October 21, 2010

Allied Interstate Inc., a large Minnesota debt collection agency with a history of consumercomplaints and state fines, has agreed to pay $1.75 million to settle federal allegations

that it broke the law by trying to collect debts people didn't owe.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said it is the second-largest civil penalty it has

obtained against a debt collection firm. It comes amid rising complaints of abusive

collection tactics and calls by state and federal legislators for more regulation.

Federal officials said the enforcement action is meant to send a message to the collections

industry that repeatedly calling consumers who dispute a debt is not tolerated.

"We think it's pervasive," Tom Pahl, an assistant director in the FTC's division of financial

practices, said of the harassing telephone calls. "If you've got the wrong person, you

should check it out, and you should stop."

The FTC also alleged that Allied debt collectors on numerous occasions spoke to

neighbors, co-workers or others about a consumer's debts. The federal agency said Allied

deceived consumers by threatening legal action it didn't intend to take. Both practices are

illegal.

The year-long investigation focused on Allied's practices in 2006 through 2008.

Many debt collectors use software, known as "robo dialers," that automatically call the

same people multiple times a day. With Allied, such calls continued even after people

insisted the firm was calling the wrong person or that they did not owe the debt, the FTC

alleged in a federal lawsuit.

It also alleged that Allied often didn't take adequate steps to determine whether

information about consumers was accurate.

In addition to paying a $1.75 million penalty to the U.S. government, Allied agreed to other

measures, most of them already required by law. They include suspending collectionefforts and conducting a reasonable investigation when consumers dispute a debt. The

firm has also agreed to not use abusive language, another allegation in the FTC's lawsuit.

Allied did not admit wrongdoing in the settlement, but said in a statement that repeat calls

to wrong numbers have been recognized as an "industry issue" for several years. The

company said it has developed statistical methods to reduce such errors and now relies on

a new system to better identify consumers' phone numbers.

"We take seriously any call placed to a wrong number and regret the inconvenience

10/27/2010 Local debt collector to pay $1.75 million

startribune.com//Print_This_Story?sid 1


2/3

caused to any consumer as a result of this," said Robert Burke, a vice president at iQor

Inc., the New York-based parent company of Allied. "...We have already seen a dramatic

reduction in complaints as a result of the new system."

Allied, based in St. Louis Park, has 11 other offices in the United States, Canada, India

and the Philippines, court papers say. In Minnesota, it has 442 licensed debt collectors.

The state Commerce Department fined the company three times from 2000 to 2002 for

violating state law, including attempting to collect on a debt after getting written notice tostop and threatening a consumer with action it did not intend to take. The fines totaled

$43,000.

The department has received 85 consumer complaints against Allied Interstate since

2004, among the most of any collection agency operating in Minnesota.

Consumer advocates applauded the FTC action.

"The fine levied for this relentless abuse of consumers is tiny compared to the profits this

agency made over the years engaging in that abuse," said Peter Barry, a Minneapolisconsumer attorney. "This lawsuit should send a strong signal to every debt collector in

America: business as usual is over."

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., who introduced legislation last month to curb abusive collection

practices, including the use of arrest warrants, said the fine "should serve as a reminder to

other debt collection agencies that they have to follow the law.

"Still, we need to pass legislation that will update the law to make certain it addresses the

wide range of abusive practices used by debt collection agencies to ensure that

Minnesota's consumers are better protected against harassment," Franken said in a

statement.

FTC officials said the action against Allied reflects a strategic shift in enforcement. About

three years ago, the agency began to focus on larger debt collectors engaged in illegal

practices. By cracking down on the big players, the agency hopes to influence smaller

debt collectors who engage in the same behavior.

Even so, enforcement actions against debt collectors are rare. The FTC has brought just

11 cases against collection firms in the past five years, and 21 in the past decade -- a

fraction of the complaints.

Last year, the FTC received 88,190 complaints about third-party debt collectors, up from

78,925 a year earlier. Nearly half of the complaints involved allegations that collectors

harassed people by calling repeatedly, the FTC said in an annual report to Congress.

"The FTC doesn't have a huge amount of resources, so any time they do take action, it's a

big deal," said Robert Hobbs, deputy director of the National Consumer Law Center in

Boston. "They focus on the really bad culprits."

Allied also has been the target of numerous private lawsuits by consumers. Ten cases




3/3

have been filed in federal court in Minnesota since December 2008, when the FTC

completed its investigation.

Wallace Milow of Zumbrota, Minn., alleged in a lawsuit last year that Allied collectors called

him repeatedly demanding he pay his son's $10,000 credit card debt. When Milow

refused, Allied allegedly threatened to have his son arrested with bail set at $12,000.

Milow alleged that Allied kept calling him even after he told the firm that he could not pay

his son's debt and asked Allied to stop contacting him. Milow, whose lawsuit was settledwithout a trial, said he couldn't speak about it because of a confidentiality provision.

Chris Serres 612-673-4308

2010 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.



local debt collector to pay $1_75 million

Documents