local single sky implementation lssip 2017 - finland · finland is late in implementing objectives...

Level 1 - Implementation Overview

Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - FINLAND

EUROCONTROL

LSSIP Year 2017 Finland Released Issue

Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Finland

Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/17

Date of Edition 02/05/2018

LSSIP Focal Point Iiro KESKIVÄLI – [email protected]

LSSIP Contact Person Luca DELL’ORTO ‐ [email protected]

Status Released

Intended for Agency Stakeholders

Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2017

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐plan

Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2016

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐report

European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

National AIP https://www.ais.fi/en

NEFAB Performance Plan https://www.nefab.eu/docs


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan).

Stakeholder / Organisation

Name Position Signature

Finnish Transport Safety Agency

(Trafi)

Pekka HENTTU

DGCA of Finland

Air Navigation Services Finland

Raine Luojus

CEO of ANS Finland

Finnish Military Aviation Authority

Kimmo NORTAJA

Director of MAA

Finavia Corporation Kimmo Mäki CEO of Finavia Corporation


CONTENTS

1. National ATM Environment ............................................................. 6 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................6 1.1. National Stakeholders .........................................................................................7 1.2.

2. Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................... 16 Evolution of traffic in Finland ........................................................................... 16 2.1. TAMPERE ACC ................................................................................................... 17 2.2.

3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 20

4. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 21 National projects .............................................................................................. 21 4.1. FAB projects ..................................................................................................... 21 4.2. Regional projects ............................................................................................. 26 4.3.

5. Cooperation activities .................................................................... 33 FAB Co‐ordination ............................................................................................ 33 5.1. Regional cooperation ...................................................................................... 33 5.2.

6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................. 35 State View......................................................................................................... 35 6.1. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 41 6.2.

Annexes

LSSIP Year 2017 Finland 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

The civil aviation regulatory tasks are carried by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi), CAA Finland, including the role as NSA.

Finavia Corporation is responsible for maintaining 21 state owned airports, of which 19 are involved in regular traffic. In addition, there are three non‐state‐owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki). Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and also the only one being co‐ordinated and covered by the LSSIP.

The separation of ANS services from airport operations took place from 1st April 2017 onwards, established as now fully state owned enterprise, Air Navigation Services Finland Oy (ANS Finland), taking care of all En‐route and airport related ATM services, except EFMI and EFSI.

The Finnish Meteorological Institute is designated as MET service provider to supply MET data on an exclusive basis in Finland FIR.

Trafi, ANS Finland and FMI report to Ministry of Transport and Communications. Finavia reports to Prime Minister’s office.

The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management.

Finland has an integrated civil‐military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs.

Military/Air Force does not have any service provision role in Finnish aviation.

Safety investigations following accidents and/or serious incidents are carried out by the Safety Investigation Authority (SIA), reporting to the Ministry of Justice.

Traffic and Capacity

2017 Traffic in Finland increased by 8.1% during Summer 2017 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in 2016.

2018‐2022 The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between ‐0.3% and 3.0% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.4 %.


18; 40%

16; 36%

2; 4%6; 13%

3; 7% Completed

Ongoing

Planned

Late

No Plan

Not Applicable

Missing Data

Undefined

Implementation Objectives Overview

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

Finland is late in implementing Objectives FCM03, INF07, ITY‐ADQ, ITY‐AGDL, ITY‐FMTP and INF04. Regarding FCM03, ANS Finland is planning for full implementation of collaborative flight planning for the year 2019. Regarding INF07, the planning for provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data is planned for the year 2018. ANS Finland expects to be compliant with ADQ by the end of 2020. Regarding ITY‐AGDL, the initial ATC Air‐Ground data link services are planned to be in operation by 2019 due to datalink telecommunication service providers’ delays. Regarding ITY‐FMTP, the common flight message transfer protocol is expected to become

operational by the end of March 2018. Regarding INF04, the integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented by the end of 2019.

Other applicable objects are planned to be implemented according to the FOC dates.

Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase.

Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.

The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.

Pre‐SESAR Implementation

2010 2019

80%

PCP Implementation

2015 2023

37%


Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs both for Block 0 and Block 1. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter 6.1.3.

Block 0 2010 2018

84%

Block 1 2015 2022

50%

n/a

70%

Pre‐SESAR

88%

100%

100%

57%

15%

Pre‐SESAR

Pre‐SESAR

Pre‐SESAR

PCP

PCP

PCP

PCP

Optimised ATM Network Services

Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing

Airport Operations

28%

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure


ATM Deployment Outlook

● State objectives

Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ APV Procedures [NAV10] 100% progress

‐ FMTP [ITY‐FMTP] 92% progress ‐ AMHS [COM10] 75% progress ‐ OAT and GAT handling [AOM13.1] 65% progress ‐ 8,33 kHz below FL195 [ITY‐AGVCS2] 54% progress ‐ ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 53% progress ‐ Real‐Time Airspace Data [AOM19.2] 52% progress ‐ ASM/ATFCM process [AOM19.3] 40% progress ‐ eTOD [INF07] 15% progress

‐ Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 98% progress ‐ Data Link [ITY‐AGDL] 47% progress ‐ Integrated Briefing [INF04] 10% progress

‐ Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITY‐SPI] 89% progress ‐ NewPENS [COM12] 53% progress ‐ MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 50% progress ‐ Aircraft Identification [ITY‐ACID] 50% progress ‐ Aeronautical Information [ITY‐ADQ] 39% progress ‐ Voice over IP [COM11] 10% progress

‐ Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 33% progress ‐ Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 10% progress ‐ Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 10% progress ‐ STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 10% progress ‐ Multi Sector Planning En‐route [ATC18] % progress

● Airport objectives ‐ EFHK ‐ Helsinki Vantaa Airport

Deployed in 2016‐2017:

‐ A‐SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 100% progress

‐ CCOs [ENV03] % progress

● Airport objec ves ‐ EFKE ‐ KEMI‐TORNIO

Deployed in 2016‐2017:

‐ Remote Tower [AOP14] % progress

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players ‐ civil and military ‐ and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;

Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;

Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017.In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.

The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


1. National ATM Environment

Geographical Scope 1.1.

International Membership

Finland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 1955

EUROCONTROL 2001

European Union 1995

EASA 2006

ICAO 1949

NATO ‐ ‐

ITU 1920

Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses the Finland FIR (EFIN).

Finland FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Norway (Norway FIR/UIR), Sweden (Sweden FIR/UIR),

Estonia (Tallinn FIR/UIR) and a non‐ECAC State, Russia (St Petersburg FIR and Murmansk FIR).

In order to achieve some of the objectives of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan

(a.k.a. the ESSIP Plan), Finland ACC co‐ordinates actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs.


Airspace Classification and Organisation

On 27 November 2003, ICAO airspace Class C was implemented above FL 95 and the upper limit of controlled airspace was raised to FL660. AIP Finland is available at: www.ais.fi

The Finnish Military uses the Metric system in one aircraft type (the L70, a single engine piston trainer).

National Stakeholders 1.2.

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Finland are the following:

‐ Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi) – the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA

‐ Air Navigation Services Finland Oy (ANS Finland) the main ATS‐provider in Finland

‐ Finavia Corporation ‐ the main airport operator in Finland

‐ Finnish Meteorological Institute – designated MET provider

‐ City of Mikkeli, Mikkeli airport (EFMI) AFIS service provider

‐ Seinäjoki airport (EFSI), AFIS service provider

‐ Military Aviation Authority (MAA) – the military regulatory body;

‐ Air Force Command Finland;

‐ Safety Investigation Authority (SIA).


Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.

Council of State

Prime Minister’sOffice

Finavia

Ministry of Justice

Safety Investigation Authority

Ministry of Transport and

Communications

Finnish Transport Safety Agency

Air NavigationServices Finland

Finnish Meteorological Institute (METSP)

Seinäjoki Airport

City of Mikkeli (Mikkeli Airport

ANSP)

Ministry of Defence

Defence Command Finland

Air Force Command Finland

Military Aviation Authority


Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in Finland is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis

Rule‐making MoTC,

Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi)

Aviation Act (864/2014), Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) and Government Decree on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (865/2009)

Safety Oversight Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi) (NSA)

Aviation Act (864/2014), Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) and Government Decree on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (865/2009)

Enforcement actions in case of non‐compliance with safety regulatory requirements


Aviation Act (864/2014), Criminal Code (39/1889)

Airspace MoTC, Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi)

Aviation Act (864/2014)

Economic MoTC, Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi)

Aviation Act (864/2014)

Environment Environmental permit authority


Environmental permits for airports are granted by permit authority according to Environmental Protection Act 527/2014 and Environmental protection decree 713/2014.

Finnish Transport Safety Agency Trafi has regulatory power in some environmental issues according to Aviation Act (864/2014)

Security MoTC,


Aviation Act (864/2014) and Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009)

Accident investigation Ministry of Justice, Safety Investigation Authority

Safety Investigation Act (525/2011)

Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi), the CAA Finland, is further detailed in the following sections.

FINNISH CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

The civil aviation regulatory tasks are carried by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi). It is an independent agency operating under the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC) and is organisationally separated from the Air Navigation Service Providers.

Annual Report published: N Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi) doesn’t publish an annual report.


The Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi) is the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in Finland.

http://www.trafi.fi/en

The current organisation chart is given at Annex B.


Service provided


Governance: State Enterpise Ownership: 100 % State owned

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en‐route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET N

ATCO training Y

Others Y ANS technical services

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

N

Annual Report published: N Will be published later 2018

ANS Finland website can be found at:

https://www.ansfinland.fi/en

ATC systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1

1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance)


FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS

Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2015, EFHK 2015

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? The present Thales TopSky ATM‐system is under continuous development.

ATC Unit EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 21 sites.

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2017, EFHK 2017

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? The present Thales TopSky ATM‐system is under continuous development.

ATC Unit EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 21 sites.

ATC Units

The ATC units in the Finnish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En‐route TMA

Finland ACC

(EFIN)

13 EFIN

Helsinki APP 4 EFIN

Note: The number of sectors as indicated in this table is the number of technically existing sectors, some of those sectors are operationally used in combined sector formats.

2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


Airports

General information

Finavia Corporation is the main airport operator in Finland, responsible for maintaining 21 airports, of which 19 are involved in regular traffic. Finavia Corporation is 100 % state owned enterprise. Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and also the only one being co‐ordinated and covered by the LSSIP.

ANS Finland is responsible for all En‐Route and airport related ATS in Finland, except EFMI and EFSI.

In addition, there are three non‐state‐owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki).

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives. According to these criteria the airport covered in this LSSIP is Helsinki‐Vantaa airport. The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for Helsinki‐Vantaa airport: https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/EFHK

Military Authorities

The Military Authorities in Finland are composed of:

‐ Defence Command Finland; ‐ Air Force Command Finland; ‐ Navy Command Finland; ‐ Army Command Finland; ‐ Military Aviation Authority (MAA).

They are supervised by the ministry of Defence.

Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.

The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management.

Finland has an integrated civil‐military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs.

Information on the application of FUA is in 1.2.4.4.

The current organisation chart is given at ANNEX B.


Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule‐making

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N/A

Level of such legal provision:

1) Finnish Aviation Act

2) Aviation Regulation‐series (issued by FCAA, incl. Rules of the Air)

3) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by MAA, e.g.regulations on Air Traffic Services for military aviation)

4) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by FINAF; e.g. prerogatives)

Level of such legal provision: N/A

Authority signing such legal provision:

1) Parliament/Head of State (President)

2) Director General of FCAA (DGCA Finland)

3) Director of MAA

4) Commander of Finnish Air Force

Authority signing such legal provision: N/A

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT

OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing

ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification

ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: The Finnish Aviation Act is binding for all civil and military aviation in Finland. Based on the Aviation Act the MAA has the right to supplement aviation regulations with official directives to such an extent that is permitted by the applicable regulations.

Additional Information:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP N National AIP

National Military AIP N National Military AIP

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP

Other: Other:


Oversight

Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N/A If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate:

Certificate issued by: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

User role

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: NSA NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En‐Route N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) En‐Route N

Approach/TMA N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) Approach/TMA N

Airfield/TWR/GND N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) Airfield/TWR/GND N

AIS N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) AIS N

MET N Finnish Meteorological Institute MET N

SAR N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) The Military assists civil ARSC on request

SAR N

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N

Other: Other: N

Additional Information: Additional Information: No GAT services provided by the Military

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT

If Military fly OAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Within specific corridors only

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control

Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service


Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

If Military fly GAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF

CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS

Others: Few Instrument Approach Procedures only for military aviation.

Military in Finland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




2. Traffic and Capacity

Evolution of traffic in Finland 2.1.

2017 Traffic in Finland increased by 8.1% during Summer 2017 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in 2016.

2018‐2022 The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between ‐0.3% and 3.0% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.4 %.

0

50.000

100.000

150.000

200.000

250.000

300.000

350.000

2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F

IFR

flig

hts

Finland - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast

2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 FH 6.5% 4.1% 2.8% 3.1% 2.3% 2.5% 2.4%B 1.9% 0.0% -0.4% 6.1% 2.6% 1.2% 1.3% 0.8% 1.1% 1.1%L 5.7% 1.1% -0.9% -0.2% -0.8% -0.5% -0.5%

ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017)IFR flights yearly growth

Finland


TAMPERE ACC 2.2.

Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022

Performance summer 2017

Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer

Capacity gap Ref value Actual

+7.1 % 58 (0%) 0.07 0.00 No

The average en‐route delay per remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2017.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments

NEFRA (EN to join) Yes

Maintain number of controllers Yes

Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK (5 ATCOs) Yes

Maximum configuration: 5/6 sectors Yes 4 sectors were sufficient

Summer 2017 performance assessment

The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 44 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 36.

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Peak Day Traffic 592 594 579 590 611

Summer Traffic 451 465 452 451 483

Yearly Traffic* 451 459 445 451 480

Summer Traffic Forecast 495 502 509 516 521

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 500 515 533 546 560

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 492 490 489 488 490

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.00 0.16 0.03 0.00 0.00

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

ght

)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

EFESACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017


Planning Period 2018‐2022

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

Summer Capacity Plan

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Free Route Airspace

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management

Airspace

Procedures Start CPDLC Project

Staffing Maintain number of

controllers

Technical

Capacity MVs of most TFVs to be raised by appr. 10% in January

Significant Events

Possible complete move of ACC to EFHK

to be decided in 2018, either way no operational impact

Max sectors 13 13 13 13 13

Max Conf 6 6 6 6 6

Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% N/A N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile

Sufficient capacity to meet demand N/A N/A N/A

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.09 0.09 N/A N/A N/A

Summer reference value (min) 0.07 0.07 N/A N/A N/A

Additional information

The opening scheme will be flexibly adapted to the traffic demand and might go up to 6 sectors if needed in Summer 2018.

H 58 0% 58 0%

Ref. 58 0% 58 0%

L 58 0% 58 0%

Open 58 0% 58 0%

C/R 58 0% 58 0%

EFIN 58

ACC2017

baseline 2018 2019

Capacity ProfilesProfiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)


0

1

2

3

4

5

600:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WD

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WE

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 58 58

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 58 58

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 58 58

Capacity Profile ‐ High 58 58

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 58 58

Capacity Baseline 58 58

2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 58 58 58 58 58

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Capacity profile (movements per hour)

EFINCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook

No problems are foreseen for the ACC during the planning cycle.


3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions

Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to Finland for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY

CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) All States + EC

State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES

Description of the planned action: Implementation programme including a system procurement has been

established. Aeronautical data quality requirements are expected to be met by the end of 2020.


4. Implementation Projects

National projects 4.1.

N/A

FAB projects 4.2.

CNS Infrastructure Rationalisation: Mapping the Situation

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), LGS (LV)

Type of project: FAB

Schedule: 2018 ‐ 2019

Status: Planned

Description: ‐

Link and references

ATM MP links: ‐

Other links: ‐

Project included in RP2 Performance Plan:

N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:

‐

Project included in DP2016:

N Name/Code in DP2016: ‐

Performance contribution

Safety: ‐

Environment: + ‐

Capacity: ‐

Cost‐efficiency: +++ Improved cost efficiency

Operational efficiency: ‐

Cooperation Activities: ‐


Kirkenes Cross‐Border Area

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO) Type of project: FAB

Schedule: 2015‐2016

Status: Implemented

Description: In November 2016 Avinor and Finavia launched cross border ATS across the border of Finland and Norway, where Kirkenes Tower/Approach is now providing the services in parts of Finnish Airspace. The arrangement facilitates more efficient and safe flight operations for flights in and outbound Kirkenes Airport in Northern Norway serving the interests of airspace users. The cross border services in Kirkenes TMA are another result of the NEFAB development programme that is investigating airspace and service improvements for the benefit of the airlines and travellers.

Link and references

ATM MP links: ‐

Other links: ‐



‐




Safety: ++ Safety improvement of cross‐border operations

Environment: N/A

Capacity: N/A

Cost‐efficiency: + More efficient usage of resources

Operational efficiency: ++ Better integrated TMA operations



NEFAB FRA



Schedule: 2014 ‐ 2017

Status: Implemented

Description: Implementation of unrestricted and seamless FRA within NEFAB and implementation of FRA compliant procedures in Bodø Oceanic. Implementation of seamless FRA interface with Norway was postponed due to technical upgrade delay in Avinor ATM system. Revised solution of unrestricted FRA between Finland, Estonia and Latvia, and state‐wide FRA in Norway were implemented in November 2015. FRA will be implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017.Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.2 L2: AOM‐0500

Other links: Nill



N/A


Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_227_AF3


Safety: Safety levels remain unchanged

Environment: ++ Enables fly shorter routes and save time and fuel burn

Capacity: Present capacity

Cost‐efficiency: + Small

Operational efficiency: ++ Optimised horizontal flight profiles



NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8)

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), Avinor Flysikring AS (NO), EANS (EE), LGS (LV)


Schedule: Seamless FRA interface between Norway and NEFAB East/DK‐SE FAB will be implemented in May 2017. FRA will be implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017. Flight planning shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030.

Status: Ongoing

Description: Implementation of Scenario 8 i.e. unrestricted and seamless FRA interface with DK/SE FAB; implementation of FRA in Bodø Oceanic.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.2

Other links: ‐


‐ Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:

‐


Y Name/Code in DP2016: AF ‐ 3.2.4


Safety: Present or improved safety

Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users

Capacity: Present or additional capacity

Cost‐efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency


Cooperation Activities: Harmonisation of flight planning rules, ASM, AIP publication, ATM system upgrades

to comply with common ORs and IFPS integration.


SMS Harmonisation



Schedule: 2016 ‐ 2020

Status: Work in progress

Description: SMS Harmonisation project was initiated in 2016 with pilot study to specify the concrete proposals, risks and mitigation for areas of possible harmonisation on short and long term. The overall objective of the SMS Harmonisation is provision of the appropriate support to: ‐ improve the total efficiency of the Safety Management Systems, ‐ enable SMS functionalities and processes supporting cross border services, ‐ enable for improved cost efficiency, ‐ enable for future integration of SMS functionalities and processes.

Link and references

ATM MP links: ‐

Other links: EU IR: 373/2017



‐




Safety: ++ Improved total efficiency of the Safety Management Systems

Environment: ‐

Capacity: ‐

Cost‐efficiency: ‐




Regional projects 4.3.

Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) (2015_227_AF3_A; 2015_227_AF3_B)

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), IAA‐ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK)

Type of project: Regional

Schedule: 15/02/2016 ‐ 31/12/2020

Status: Ongoing, on time, INEA funding granted (Call 2015)

Description: Project Objective: ‐ Implementing FRA, which is a key element of ATM Functionality (AF3) ‐ Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route, across three functional airspace blocks (FABs). Namely, NEFAB, DK‐SE FAB and UK‐IRE FAB ‐ The implementation will support the achievement of the flight efficiency targets for RP2 of the performance scheme. The Performance Review Body (PRB) and the Network Manager (NM) has highlighted the need to pay particular attention to interfaces between the Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) and the deployment of FRA initiatives to achieve these targets ‐ Reducing fuel consumption by allowing users to flightplan their preferred trajectories ‐ Introducing seamless integration among ACCs ‐ Reducing the effort on ATCOs by allowing a more costeffective approach, while keeping the highest level of safety ‐ The implementation also includes EANS (Estonia) who are applying for funding their contribution towards implementation through the Cohesion fund Contributors: Avinor Flysikring AS, ANS Finland, Irish Aviation Authority, LFV, NATS, Naviair, Ryanair, LGS, EANS, Isavia The project implementation scope depend on the coordinated work of all 9 partners (Avinor Flysikring AS, ANS Finland, IAA, LFV,LGS, NATS, Naviair, EANS, Isavia, Ryanair) and is split into a cohesion and non‐cohesion part.

Link and references


Other links: DP2016: Family 3.2.4; Project 2015_227_AF3_A and 2015_227_AF3_B



‐


‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐


Safety: ‐

Environment: ‐

Capacity: ‐





Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 1

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), Avinor Flysikring AS (NO), EANS (EE), IAA‐ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK)


Schedule: 31.12.2018

Status: Ongoing, on time

Description: Implementation of FRA in Scottish FIR, Interface with NEFAB and DK/SE FAB FRAs INEA funding granted (Call 2015)

Link and references


Other links: SESAR Deployment Program 2015



‐





Environment: Present or improved environmental impact


Cost‐efficiency: Improved cost efficiency for airspace users


Cooperation Activities: Common project management, simulations, training and deployment


Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 2

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), Avinor Flysikring AS (NO), EANS (EE), IAA‐ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK)




Description: Implementation of FRA in London FIR, implementation of FRA in Icelandic airspace and interfacing with neighbouring NEFAB & DK/SE FAB INEA funding granted (Call 2015)

Link and references





‐











Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1)

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), IAA‐ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK)


Schedule: 01/01/2014 ‐ 31/12/2016

Status: Completed

Description: The Borealis Alliance will implement Free Route Airspace (FRA) within the NEFRA region that consists of the two functional airspace blocks (FAB) of Denmark‐Sweden and North European Functional Airspace Block (Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Norway). Free Route Airspace is a key element of the Pilot Common Project and NEFRA is a crossborder inter‐FAB region of Europe. This project will be broken down into airspace design, fast and real‐time simulations and finally implementation. A second part is planned at a later stage to cover also the airspaces of UK, Ireland and Iceland.

Link and references


Other links: DP2016: Family 3.2.4; Project 020AF3



‐




Safety: ‐

Environment: ‐

Capacity: ‐





NEFRA Phase 1

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), Avinor Flysikring AS (NO), EANS (EE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK)


Schedule: 23 June 2016

Status: Completed

Description: NEFAB / NEFRA FRA scenario 8, implement seamless FRA volume across all NEFAB States and DK/SE FAB.

Link and references


Other links: SESAR Deployment Programme 2015



‐











NEFRA Phase 2

Organisation(s): ANS Finland (FI), Avinor Flysikring AS (NO), EANS (EE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK)




Description: NEFAB / NEFRA scenario 8, ATM systems upgrade and further IFPS integration among participating ANSPs

Link and references





‐











Sub‐regional SWIM MET deployment to support NEFRA (A & B) (2015_025_AF5_A)

Organisation(s): Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE)


Schedule: 01/11/2016 ‐ 31/12/2018

Status: ‐

Description: Project Leader: Finnish Meteorological Institute Contributors: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Danish Meteorological Institute The project implementation scope depend on the coordinated work of all 3 partners (Finnish Meteorological Institute, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Danish Meteorological Institute) and is split into a cohesion and non‐cohesion part. Project Objective ‐ Implementation of a flexible and cost‐effective interoperable production and exchange of MET information for Northern European MET service providers compliant with the SWIM data formats and interfaces ‐ Demonstration and verification of cost‐effective multistakeholder operational deployment of SWIM for MET information ‐ Implementation and verification covering TAFs and METARs for civil airports within the geographical scope of the project, AIRMETs and SIGMETs for Sondrestrom, Kobenhavn, Sweden and Finland (part A) and Tallinn and Riga FIRs (part B), METARs and AUTO‐METARs for civil airports and Significant Weather Charts (SWCs) for Sweden and Finland (part A) and Estonia and Latvia (part B) covering the Scandinavian footprint ‐ Development and implementation of a central database and web services for the exchange of MET information in SWIM compliant format and easy availability to users ‐ Development and implementation of common user interfaces to facilitate the generation and monitoring of harmonised and coherent MET information ‐ Embedding and implementing the systems/applications in the operational production and monitoring chains of all project contributors

Link and references

ATM MP links: ‐

Other links: INF08.1 DP: Family 5.4.1; Project 2015_025_AF5_A and 2015_025_AF5_B



‐




Safety: ‐

Environment: ‐

Capacity: ‐





5. Cooperation activities FAB Co-ordination 5.1.

NEFAB FRA

The overall objective of NEFAB FRA project was implementation of unrestricted and seamless FRA within NEFAB and implementation of FRA compliant procedures in Bodø Oceanic. The project was executed in several steps:

Revised solution of unrestricted FRA between Finland, Estonia and Latvia, and state‐wide FRA in Norway were implemented in November 2015;

FRA was implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017.Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030;

The final integration of all NEFAB FRA volumes into seamless continuum was completed in May 2017.

This project was executed in close cooperation with DK‐SE FAB, involving the stepwise interfacing of FRA volumes in two neighbouring FABs, as described in chapter 5.2.

SMS Harmonisation

SMS Harmonisation project was initiated in 2016 with pilot study to specify the concrete proposals, risks and mitigation for areas of possible harmonisation on short and long term.

The overall objective of the SMS Harmonisation is to provide the appropriate support to:

improve the total efficiency of the Safety Management Systems,

enable SMS functionalities and processes supporting cross border services,

enable for improved cost efficiency,

enable for future integration of SMS functionalities and processes.

Regional cooperation 5.2.

Regional cooperation initiatives

NEFRA

NEFAB has been closely cooperating with DK‐SE FAB within an agreed concept to implement a continuous and seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs. The project was named North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme. The NEFRA Programme anticipated the implementation of seamless interface between the two FABs above FL285 (because Danish‐Swedish FAB FRA is above FL285). In November 2015 the first milestone of NEFRA Phase 1 was implemented with harmonized FPL rules for FRA operations across the two FABs. First step of cross‐border FRA between two FABs was implemented in June 2016 with seamless FRA operations between NEFAB East (Estonia, Finland, Latvia) and DK‐SE FAB. Seamless FRA interface with Norway was finalised in May 2017 allowing unrestricted FRA operation across the borders of all six states in both FABs. FRA was also implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017. Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic is done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030.


Borealis FRA

The Borealis Alliance Framework Agreement is a legal document that sets up a framework for the industrial partnership between 9 European ANSPs ‐ LFV (Sweden), ANS Finland (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). The objective of the Alliance is to enable joint initiatives to improve flight efficiency and reduce environmental impact, delivered across the whole area in a move which will also streamline cost of services and operational/technical infrastructure.

In 2015 Borealis Alliance initiated the Free Route Airspace (FRA) Programme to create a multi‐FAB FRA by establishing interfaces between FRA areas in 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK‐SE FAB and UK‐IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis FRA concept of operation is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. to connect the FRA volumes of 9 States seamlessly, so that these appear as one continuous FRA to airspace users.


18; 40%

16; 36%

2; 4%

6; 13%

3; 7% Completed

Ongoing

Planned

Late

No Plan

Not Applicable

Missing Data

Undefined

6. Implementation Objectives Progress

State View 6.1.

Overall Objective Implementation

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

Finland is late in implementing Objectives FCM03, INF07, ITY‐ADQ, ITY‐AGDL, ITY‐FMTP and INF04. Regarding FCM03, ANS Finland is planning for full implementation of collaborative flight planning for the year 2019. Regarding INF07, the planning for provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data is planned for the year 2018. ANS Finland expects to be compliant with ADQ by the end of 2020. Regarding ITY‐AGDL, the initial ATC Air‐Ground data link services are planned to be in operation by 2019 due to datalink telecommunication service providers’ delays. Regarding ITY‐FMTP, the common flight message transfer protocol is expected to become operational by the end of March 2018. Regarding INF04, the integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented by the end of 2019.

Other applicable objects are planned to be implemented according to the FOC dates.


Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature

Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C.

Legend:

## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)

100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline


<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

65%

AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 53%

AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data 52%

AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing

40%

FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 100%

FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 98%

FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1

n/a

FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 10%

FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 33%

FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 10%


Advanced Air Traffic Services

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing

n/a

AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace 100%

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective

EFKE ‐ KEMI‐TORNIO 0%

ATC02.2 STCA En‐Route 100%

ATC02.8 Ground‐Based Safety Nets 100%

ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 100%

ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures

EFHK ‐ Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100%

ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring

50%

ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN

100%

ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace

n/a

ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 100%

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

100%

ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Local objective 0%

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations


ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective


ITY‐COTR Ground‐Ground Automated Co‐ordination Processes

100%

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100%

NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations

n/a

NAV10 APV procedures 100%

NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft

Local objective

n/a


High Performing Airport Operations

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1


AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2


AOP05 Airport CDM


AOP10 (PCP) Time‐Based Separation

EFHK ‐ Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area)

n/a

AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan


n/a

AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring


n/a

AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing


n/a

ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management


SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions

100%



<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 75%

COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 10%

COM12 (PCP) NewPENS 53%

FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 10%

INF04 Integrated Briefing 10%

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 15%

ITY‐ACID Aircraft Identification 50%

ITY‐ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information

39%

ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services 47%

ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195

54%

ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 92%

ITY‐SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 89%


ICAO ASBU Implementation

The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).

Legend:

= Completed (during 2017 or before)

= Missing planning date

= Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance

100%

B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)

100%

B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration

100%

97%

B0‐DATM

Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management

100%

24%

B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%

B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets

100%

B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 100%

B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)

100%

B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories

100%

76%

B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view

100%

99%

B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%

89%

B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)

100%

B0‐TBO

Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route

100%

47%


Detailed Objectives Implementation progress 6.2.

Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C.

Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

Completed No Plan

Ongoing Not Applicable

Planned Missing Data

Late

Main Objectives

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

65% Ongoing

‐

Implementation is planned according to the timeframe. 31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

Implementation will require changes to regulations and/or legislation possibly in co‐operation with FCAA.

‐ 40% Ongoing

31/12/2018

FCAA

Aviation act revised in November 2014. Conformance analysis as a part of EUROAT implementation has been completed. EUROAT implementation and publication of Country Chapter depends on the military aviation authority's decision to extend the application of the national military aviation regulations to include foreign military aircraft.

‐ 40%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

MIL has no ANSP role. ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

ANS Finland Implementation and training of staff planned for the year 2018

‐ 43% Ongoing

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

Implementation will require changes to regulations and/or legislation possibly in co‐operation with FCAA.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015


AOM19.1 (PCP)

ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

53% Ongoing

‐

Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 31/12/2018 31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

ANS Finland Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 31/12/2018

‐ 53% Ongoing

31/12/2018

AOM19.2 (PCP)

ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

52% Ongoing

‐

LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATC‐system planned by 31/12/2018, compatible with NM system

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland

LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATC‐system planned by 31/12/2018, compatible with NM system, there are still problems to be solved at Finnish Airforce branch

‐ 52%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

AOM19.3 (PCP)

Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

40% Ongoing

‐

LARA connection to TopSky ATC‐system and full MIL‐connectivity planned by 31/12/2018, enabling AOM19.3 requirements before required FOC date 31/12/2021

30/06/2018

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland LARA connection to TopSky ATC‐system and full MIL‐connectivity planned by 31/12/2018, enabling AOM19.3 requirements

‐ 40% Ongoing

30/06/2018

AOM21.1 (PCP)

Direct Routing (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable

‐

NEFAB wide continues FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL95 to FL660.

‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

ANS Finland ‐ ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


AOM21.2 (PCP)

Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

100% Completed

‐

NEFAB wide continous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis is under construction.

12/11/2015

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland

NEFAB wide continuous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis is under construction.

Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) / Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 1 /

Borealis FRA Part 2,

Phase 2 / Borealis

Free Route Airspace (Part 1) /

NEFAB FRA / NEFRA

Phase 1 / NEFRA Phase 2

100%

Completed

12/11/2015

AOP04.1

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011

100% Completed

EFHK ‐ Helsinki Vantaa Airport

A‐SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. 31/03/2011

REG (By:12/2010)

FCAA A‐SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. ‐ 100% Completed

31/03/2011

ASP (By:12/2011)

ANS Finland

A‐SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. Currently EFHK has got A‐SMGCS Level 2 with 3 SMR‐s and Mode S Multilateration System. Systems fulfill agreed performance specifications and are in operational use

‐ 100%

Completed

31/03/2011

APO (By:12/2010)

HELSINKI‐VANTAA Airport

A‐SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. ‐ 100% Completed

31/03/2011


AOP04.2

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed


Helsinki‐Vantaa Airport A‐SMGCS‐system fulfills ETSI EN 303 213‐1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213‐1 v1.2.1 specifications being A‐SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018

15/01/2018

ASP (By:12/2017)

ANS Finland

Helsinki‐Vantaa Airport A‐SMGCS‐system fulfills ETSI EN 303 213‐1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213‐1 v1.2.1 specifications being A‐SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018

‐ 100%

Completed

15/01/2018

APO (By:12/2017)


The equipment installed is a Mode S‐based vehicle transponder with GPS‐receiver

‐ 100% Completed

30/06/2010

AOP05

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed


CDM was implemented at Helsinki‐Vantaa in 2012 31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2016)

ANS Finland CDM was implemented at Helsinki‐Vantaa in 2012 ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012

APO (By:12/2016)


CDM was implemented in 2012. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012

AOP10 (PCP)

Time‐Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Not applicable ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

ASP (By:12/2023)


AOP11 (PCP)

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Not applicable ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)


Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2021)


‐ ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

AOP12 (PCP)

Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Not applicable ‐

ASP (By:12/2020)

APO (By:12/2020)

AOP13 (PCP)

Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


EFHK is a non PCP airport ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

FCAA Applicability Area: 25 PCP Airports

‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)


Applicable

‐


ATC02.8

Ground‐Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed

‐

Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). APM was implemented in 2012.

31/10/2012

ASP (By:12/2016)

ANS Finland

Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). APM was implemented in 2012.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/10/2012

ATC02.9

Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

100% Completed

‐

Comment by LSSIP ECTL Team: the objective now refers to the implementation of a enhanced STCA. It is linked to SESAR Solution #60 ‐ see the attached description of the SESAR Solution referring to the multi‐hypothesis algorithm addressed. If your STCA does not use this type of logic, please still report the objective as complete ¿ what matters to us is that you have an STCA up and running in your TMAs, and to capture this info. In which case though, please add a statement at State and ASP level that specifies that your STCA does not use a multi‐hypothesis algorithm, if that is not the case. STCA in use for several years, plans for major changes not foreseen in near future

01/01/1999

ASP (By:12/2020)

ANS Finland ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

01/01/1999

ATC07.1

AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019

100% Completed


Several versions of arrival Management Tools have been implemented in ACC and APP. 30/11/2005

ASP (By:12/2019)

ANS Finland

Initial arrival management tool functionality is completed since 1999 for Tampere ACC and Helsinki APP, using same equipment (MAESTRO) as in Copenhagen / Malmo. In 2005, an integrated Arrival Manager functionality has been implemented within the adjacent Helsinki / Tallinn TMAs.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/11/2005


ATC12.1

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

50% Ongoing

‐

Original ATC12 Completed, additional ATC12.1 functionality planned and project ongoing according to the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA FRA‐airspace needs. Implementation in two phases Q1/2018 and Q1/2020.

30/03/2020

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland

Original ATC12 Completed, additional ATC12.1 functionality planned and project ongoing according to the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA FRA‐airspace needs. Implementation in two phases Q1/2018 and Q1/2020.

‐ 50%

Ongoing

30/03/2020

ATC15.1

Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

‐

Completed in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki‐Vantaa Maestro system. 31/12/2000

ASP (By:12/2017)

ANS Finland Completed in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki‐Vantaa Maestro system.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2000

ATC15.2 (PCP)

Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

% Not

Applicable

‐

There is no such airport in Finland which would require extended AMAN for surrounding ACC(s). Finland FIR belongs in the affected airspace from the point of Stockholm Arlanda airport. No initiative has been raised by Arlanda towards Finland FIR and thus Finland has no plan for this issue.

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)

ANS Finland

There is no such airport in Finland which would require extended AMAN for surrounding ACC(s). Finland FIR belongs in the affected airspace from the point of Stockholm Arlanda airport. No initiative has been raised by Arlanda towards Finland FIR and thus Finland has no plan for this issue.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

‐

Fully completed and operational between Finland‐Estonia 6/2014 30/06/2014

ASP (By:12/2018)

ANS Finland Fully completed and operational between Finland‐Estonia 6/2014

‐ 100% Completed

30/06/2014

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

75% Ongoing

‐

Basic AMHS implemented 31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

ANS Finland

Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but due to delays at regional AMHS center at Copenhagen, transition of connections from Cidin to AMHS were delayed. Transition was done 10/2016.

‐ 75%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

COM11

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

10% Ongoing

‐

This objective is expected to be implemented within the given timeframe. 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

ANS Finland This objective is expected to be implemented within the given timeframe.

‐ 10% Ongoing

31/12/2020


COM12 (PCP)

New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020

53% Ongoing

‐

‐ 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2024)

ANS Finland

ANS Finland is partner of NewPENS‐project funded by INEA (INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2015/1132363 / Action 2015‐EU‐TM‐0196‐M / Activity 11) and coordinated by Eurocontrol and thereon in schedule

‐ 43%

Ongoing

31/12/2020

Finnish Meteorological Institute

FMI is partner of NewPENS‐project funded by INEA (INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2015/1132363 / Action 2015‐EU‐TM‐0196‐M / Activity 11) and coordinated by Eurocontrol and thereon in schedule

‐ 43%

Ongoing

31/12/2020

APO (By:12/2024)


ANS Finland is repsenting Helsinki‐Vantaa Airport and partner of NewPENS‐project funded by INEA (INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2015/1132363 / Action 2015‐EU‐TM‐0196‐M / Activity 11) and coordinated by Eurocontrol and thereon in schedule

‐ 75%

Ongoing

31/12/2020

ENV01

Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013

100% Completed


The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia.

31/12/2009

ASP (By:12/2013)

ANS Finland The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2009

APO (By:12/2013)


The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2009


ENV02

Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed


Finavia's co‐operation with operators is continuous. Procedures are planned according to environmental etc. demands.

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2016)

ANS Finland

As an Airport operator and Air Navigation Service Provider Finavia is having a constant co‐operation with Airline Operators. The co‐operation has been in place for several years.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2009

APO (By:12/2016)


CEM issues are discussed frequently trough the year together with airport and aircraft operators.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012

FCM03

Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

98% Late

‐

Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2019 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2017)

ANS Finland

Functionality installed and available but problems so far at NM within automatically processing and firmly specifying the use of AFP‐messages in the Free Route Airspace environment causes that full FoC implementation of collaborative flight planning is estimated to take place not before year 2019. Though all functionality has been installed according to spec, the interoperability betweeen Thales TopSky and NM system has not been achieved due to complicated FRA operations environment, not fully covered at NM.

‐ 98%

Late

31/12/2019

FCM04.1

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable

‐

N/A ‐

ASP (By:10/2017)

ANS Finland N/A ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


FCM04.2 (PCP)

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

10% Ongoing

‐

Planning started, for Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland

Planning started, for Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2.

‐ 10%

Ongoing

31/12/2021

FCM05 (PCP)

Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

33% Ongoing

‐

Plans exist to implement the interactive rolling NOP, project planning started 2016. Application for INEA funding is under progress, within the scope of SESAR Deployment Programme 2015.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021

‐ 10% Ongoing

31/12/2021

APO (By:12/2021)


Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021

‐ 55% Ongoing

31/12/2021

FCM06 (PCP)

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

10% Ongoing

‐

Planned according to objective FOC. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland Initial research launched. ‐ 10% Ongoing

31/12/2021

FCM08 (PCP)

Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

10% Ongoing

‐

Project started, FOC planned Q1/2021 30/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ANS Finland Project started, FOC planned Q1/2021 ‐ 10% Ongoing

30/12/2021


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018

15% Late

‐

Planning in progress. The objective is expected to be completed by the end of 2018. 31/12/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

FCAA

A project group consisting of all relevant stakeholders has been established to create the National TOD Policy and implementation programme. Drafting of implementation programme is in progress.

‐ 13%

Late

31/12/2018

ASP (By:05/2018)

ANS Finland Project in progress ‐ 25% Late

31/12/2018

APO (By:05/2018)


Planning in progress ‐ 10% Late

31/12/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft Identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020

50% Ongoing

‐

Planning in progress, see ASP comment. 02/01/2020

ASP (By:01/2020)

ANS Finland

Project in progress, the A/C link and ACID capability is technically ready (DAPS, Downlinked Aircraft ParameterS) for ATM‐system TopSky. The operational use of ACID is planned to happen country wide by 31/12/2018 when the WAM and Mode‐S sensors will cover entire Finland FIR. With WAM system there has been delays due to financial problems of the system provider.

‐ 50%

Ongoing

02/01/2020


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

39% Late

‐

The requirements of this objective have been postponed until forecasted FoC 12/2020 30/12/2020

REG (By:06/2017)

FCAA The requirements of this objective have been extremely challenging to meet, it is estimated that implementation will not take place until 12/2020.

‐ 62% Late

30/12/2020

ASP (By:06/2017)

ANS Finland

Discussions are ongoing between the ASP, the APO, the NSA and Ministry of Transportation about the scope and implementation. A special joint‐project team was set up during year 2015 but it is estimated that implementation will not take place until 12/2020.

‐ 50%

Late

30/12/2020

APO (By:06/2017)


Discussions are ongoing between the ASP, the APO, the NSA and Ministry of Transportation about the scope and implementation. A special joint‐project team was set up during year 2015 but it is estimated that implementation will not take place until 12/2020.

‐ 10%

Late

30/06/2019


ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

47% Late

‐

ANS Finland has informed 24.11.2017 delays to SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) concerning the installation time and the reasons of delays. Due to delivery time of needed systems and busy with other customers the Telecommunication (Datalink) service providers are able to deliver needed systems during the last quarter of 2018. ANS Finland is aware of this regulation and actions have been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements. Relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by ANS Finland.

01/01/2019

REG (By:02/2018)

FCAA

ANS Finland has informed 24.11.2017 delays to SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) concerning the installation delays. Relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by ANS Finland.

‐ 40%

Late

01/12/2018

ASP (By:02/2018)

ANS Finland

The remaining part of AGDL, the A/G radiolink service, will be hired from ARINC and SITA depending on how the SESAR Deployment Manager DLS recovery plan will be put in place. SITA is likely to get the service running by end of Q4/2018, ARINC has not yet confirmed if this can be done by Q4/2018

‐ 57%

Late

31/12/2018

MIL (By:01/2019)

Military Authority

25% of transport‐type State aircraft will be equipped. No current plan for further updates.

‐ 10% Ongoing

01/01/2019


ITY‐AGVCS2

8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

54% Ongoing

‐

Finland has notified the European Commission of temporary derogations from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 on 12.12.2016. The Finnish Transport Safety Agency grants exemptions from the requirements in Articles 4(5) 31.12.2027, 5(4) 1.1.2028 and 6(10) 31.12.2028

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

FCAA The requirements are planned to be implemented within the timeframe of the notification to the EC.

‐ 55% Ongoing

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

ANS Finland ANS Finland is planning to implement this regulation according to the objective schedule

‐ 43% Ongoing

31/12/2018

Military Authority

MIL has no service provision role. ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

MIL (By:12/2020)

Military Authority

All aircraft that will be in use after implementation date are equipped with 8,33kHz radios.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2017

APO (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

MIL has no service provision/APO role. ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


ANS Finland is planning to implement this regulation according to the objective schedule

‐ 37% Ongoing

31/12/2018

ITY‐FMTP

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

92% Late

‐

Will become operational by 31 Mar 2018 31/03/2018

ASP (By:12/2014)

ANS Finland Will become operational by 31 Mar 2018 ‐ 92% Late

31/03/2018

MIL (By:12/2014)

Military Authority

Integrated civil‐military airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation.

‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


ITY‐SPI

Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

89% Ongoing

‐

The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. All REG and ASP SloAs are completed. Remaining SloAs will be completed within the timeframe of the regulation.

07/06/2020

REG (By:02/2015)

FCAA The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

ASP (By:02/2015)

ANS Finland

The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. (In the preceding LSSIPs there were texts about plans to introduce WAM‐systems but due to various technical and commercial problems, the plans have been halted so far)

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

MIL (By:06/2020)

Military Authority

MIL has no role in ANSP/surveillance capability issues. All transport type aircraft have MODE S ‐capabilities and almost all will be updated to ADS‐B OUT within timescale.

‐ 70%

Ongoing

07/06/2020

NAV03.1

RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

100% Completed

‐

P‐RNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. 31/12/2005

ASP (By:12/2023)

ANS Finland

P‐RNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. The feasibility and benefits from P‐RNAV in other Finnish TMAs, and furthermore in the joint adjacent Helsinki/Tallinn TMAs has been assessed in 2005 and P‐RNAV routes have been implemented.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2005

NAV03.2 (PCP)

RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

% Not

Applicable

‐

‐ ‐

ASP (By:12/2023)

ANS Finland

Planned but FoC date is not known. However, Helsinki‐Vantaa is not among the PCP airports, so, actually this Object is Not Applicable for EFHK

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2023


NAV10

APV Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed

‐

APV/Baro VNAV procedures will be published by the end of year 2016. 30/11/2016

REG (By:04/2016)

FCAA Finland applies criteria published by EASA. Specifically, AMC 20‐26 and AMC 20‐27.

‐ 100% Completed

25/08/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

ANS Finland ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

30/11/2016

SAF11

Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

100% Completed

‐

Finland is compliant with the relevant parts of EAPPRE. 31/12/2015

REG (By:01/2018)

FCAA The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions have been implemented utilising the Finnish Aviation Safety Plan.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

ANS Finland Requirements fulfilled during 2014. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

APO (By:12/2014)

Military Authority

‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014


Requirements fulfilled during 2014. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014


Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

100% Completed

‐

Implemented in 2012. 30/04/2012

ASP (By:01/2013)

ANS Finland Implemented in 2012 ‐ 100% Completed

30/04/2012

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

100% Completed

‐

The requirements stemming from Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 of 16 December 2011 laying down common airspace usage requirements and operating procedures for airborne collision avoidance have been implemented in Finland.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

FCAA All REG SloA's are completed. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)

ANS Finland Training completed in 2012. ACAS performance monitoring has been in place since 2008.

‐ 100% Completed

31/05/2012

MIL (By:12/2015)

Military Authority

Transport type ‐aircraft equipped with TCAS II 7.0 or TCAS I. No update planned. ACAS II functionalities are trained during flight cadets training for tactical aircraft.

‐ 100% Completed

31/03/2012

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

100% Completed

‐

Objective has been completed. 30/11/2010

ASP (By:07/2014)

ANS Finland Completed 2010 ‐ 100% Completed

30/11/2010


INF04

Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012

10% Late

‐

Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented by 31.12.2019 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2012)

ANS Finland

Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented by 31.12.2019. However, even if the integrated service is not yet automated, the integrated output is presently carried out manually by the briefing unit in order to give the requested output for the pilot.

‐ 10%

Late

31/12/2019

ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations.

30/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2012)

ANS Finland Planned according to the regulations (1032/2006 , 29/2009 and 30/2009).

‐ 100% Completed

30/12/2012

MIL (By:12/2012)

Military Authority

Integrated civil‐military airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation.

‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


Local Objectives

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local

% Planned

EFKE ‐ KEMI‐TORNIO

The possibility to implement remote aerodrome ATS in some of the small aerodromes will be investigated further

31/12/2022

ATC18 Multi‐Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local

% Planned

‐

Under investigation, feasibility study ongoing whether a project should be initiated 31/12/2023

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local

% Ongoing


Approximately 70% of departures are CCO 31/12/2019

NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local

% Not

Applicable

‐

Not Applicable, no IFR routes published for Rotorcraft ‐

Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.


ANNEXES

ANNEX A ‐ Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co‐ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP National Focal Point for Finland Finnish Transport Safety Agency Iiro KESKIVÄLI

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Finnish Transport Safety Agency Iiro KESKIVÄLI

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Air Navigation Services Finland Pekka VIRTANEN

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Finavia Corporation Heikki PÖLLÄNEN

LSSIP Focal Point for Military Military Aviation Authority Heikki KUORELAHTI and Timo VÄHÄMÄKI

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Finland DPS/PEPR Luca DELL’ORTO


Implementation Objectives

Implementation Objective

EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners

National Stakeholder Specialist ANSP/Airport operator

AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI

Sami FABRITIUS (ANS Finland)

AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /

O. MROWICKI



O. MROWICKI



O. MROWICKI


AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Teppo ASANTI (ANS Finland)

AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Teppo ASANTI (ANS Finland)

AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Jari TOIVONEN (ANS Finland) Heini NORONEN‐JUHOLA/Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Jari TOIVONEN (ANS Finland) Heini NORONEN‐JUHOLA/Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Timo SUORTO (ANS Finland) Heini NORONEN‐JUHOLA/Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM Tomi HANNUKSELA (ANS Finland) Heini NORONEN‐JUHOLA/Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Karri HANNULA (ANS Finland) Heini NORONEN‐JUHOLA/Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Karri HANNULA (ANS Finland) Heini NORONEN‐JUHOLA/Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM N/A

AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE

Christer BJÖRKMAN (ANS Finland) Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Sakari YLINIEMI (ANS Finland)

ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Sakari YLINIEMI (ANS Finland)

ATC07.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Sakari YLINIEMI (ANS Finland)



ATC15.2 L. DELL’ORTO P. HOP Sakari YLINIEMI (ANS Finland)

ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. MORTON Heikki ISOMAA (ANS Finland)

ATC18 L. DELL’ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI Heikki ISOMAA (ANS Finland)

COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU Osmo NIEMINEN (ANS Finland)

COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU Osmo NIEMINEN (ANS Finland) Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS Osmo NIEMINEN (ANS Finland)

ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN Heikki ISOMAA (ANS Finland) Mikko VIINIKAINEN (Finavia)


ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY Heikki ISOMAA (ANS Finland) Mikko VIINIKAINEN (Finavia)

ENV03 A‐P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN Heikki ISOMAA (ANS Finland) Mikko VIINIKAINEN (Finavia)

FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI

Heikki ISOMAA (ANS Finland)

FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI

Erik BERG (ANS Finland)

FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI

Erik BERG (ANS Finland)

FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI

Jani RAUTIAINEN (ANS Finland)

FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI

Jani RAUTIAINEN (ANS Finland)

FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI

Tomi HANNUKSELA (ANS Finland) Heini NORONEN‐JUHOLA/Petri LAMPI (Finavia)

INF07 A‐P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY Jari TOIVONEN (ANS Finland)

ITY‐ACID O. CIOARA pending N/A

ITY‐ADQ A‐P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER Heikki ISOMAA (ANS Finland)

ITY‐AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC Jussi KIVELÄ (ANS Finland)

ATY‐AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET Osmo NIEMINEN (ANS Finland)

ITY‐FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU Osmo NIEMINEN (ANS Finland)

ITY‐SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY Jani SUOMELA (ANS Finland)

NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Mika SUORTO (ANS Finland)

NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Osmo NIEMINEN (ANS Finland)

NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH Osmo NIEMINEN (ANS Finland)

NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET

Jari TOIVONEN (ANS Finland)

SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending Jani SUOMELA (ANS Finland)


ANNEX B ‐ National Stakeholders Organisation charts

Finnish Transport Safety Agency Trafi

DIRECTOR GENERAL

Mia Nykopp

TRANSPORT

OPERATORS Hanna Hakanen

PERSONNEL LICENSING

Kimmo Pylväs ORGANISATION

SERVICES Heidi Niemimuukko INFRASTRUCTURE

SERVICES Jari Pöntinen

MEANS OF

TRANSPORT Olli Lindroos

VESSELS Juha‐Matti Korsi

VEHICLES Toni Pallaspuro

LEGAL AFFAIRS

Matti Luopa

COMMUNICATIONS

Marjo Jäppinen

ADMINISTRATION Juhani Nikula

HUMAN RESOURCES Pia Palviainen

FINANCE Tomi Harju

TRANSPORT

SYSTEM AND DEVELOPMENT Janne Huhtamäki

ICT SERVICES Heidi Rantanen

TRANSPORT

INFORMATION Kirsi Pulkamo

RULEMAKING AND

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

Susanna Metsälampi

AVIATION Pekka Henttu

MARITIME SECTOR

RAIL TRANSPORT SECTOR

ROAD TRANSPORT

DATA AND KNOWLEDGE


Finavia Corporation



CEO

Supportingfunctions

Operationalplanning and

operative ATC‐units

Technical planningand operations

Safety and Compliance

Annual meeting of shareholders

Board


ANNEX C – Implementation Objectives’ Applicability

Objective SESAR

Key Feature

ICAO ASBU

B0 European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area

AOM13.1

‐ All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and

Moldova.

AOM19.1

B0‐FRTO All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and

Moldova

AOM19.2

‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova

AOM19.3

‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova

AOM21.1

B0‐FRTO 25 ECAC States

AOM21.2

‐ All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the

Netherlands

AOP04.1

B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports

AOP04.2

B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports

AOP05

B0‐ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non‐PCP airports

AOP10

‐ 16 PCP Airports

AOP11

‐ 24 PCP airports, 15 non‐PCP airports

AOP12

‐ 25 PCP airports

AOP13

‐ 25 PCP airports

AOP14

‐ Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs

ATC02.2 B0‐SNET Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did

not yet implement it

ATC02.8

B0‐SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands

ATC02.9

B0‐SNET TMAs, according to local business needs

ATC07.1

B0‐RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non‐PCP airports

ATC12.1

‐ All ECAC States except Luxembourg

ATC15.1

B0‐RSEQ

EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak

Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC,

Norway, Switzerland, Turkey

ATC15.2

‐ ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to

TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports

ATC16 B0‐ACAS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that

did not yet implement it

ATC17

B0‐FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine

ATC18

‐ Local: Subject to local needs and complexity

COM10

‐ All ECAC States

COM11

‐ All ECAC States


COM12

‐

‐ Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement

Agreement): 33 ANSPs

‐ Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part

of Area 1

ENV01

B0‐CDO 59 Airports

ENV02

‐ 47 Airports

ENV03

B0‐CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity

FCM01 B0‐NOPS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that


FCM03

B0‐NOPS All ECAC States

FCM04.1

B0‐NOPS Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland,

Spain, Switzerland

FCM04.2

B0‐NOPS All EU+ States

FCM05

B0‐NOPS All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC

and Moldova

FCM06

B0‐NOPS All EU+ States

FCM07

‐ All EU+ States

FCM08

‐ All ECAC States

FCM09

‐ All ECAC States

INF04 B0‐DATM Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that


INF07

‐ All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC

INF08.1

‐ All EU+ States

INF08.2

‐ All EU+ States

ITY‐ACID

‐ All EU+ States

ITY‐ADQ

B0‐DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC

ITY‐AGDL

B0‐TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands

ITY‐AGVCS2

‐ All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova

ITY‐COTR B0‐FICE Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did

not yet implement it

ITY‐FMTP

B0‐FICE All ECAC States

ITY‐SPI

B0‐ASUR All EU+ States

NAV03.1

B0‐CDO,

B0‐CCO All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic

NAV03.2

‐ Mandatory for TMAs listed in section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP

Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs

NAV10

B0‐APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC

NAV12

‐ Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity

SAF11

‐ All ECAC States except Malta


Legend:

Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:


High Performing Airport Operations

Advanced Air Traffic Services



ANNEX D ‐ Glossary of Abbreviations

This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Finland.

Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

Term Description

AF ATM Functionality

FT Fast Track

PCP Pilot Common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

NEFAB North European Functional Airspace Block

NEFRA North European Free Route Airspace

S‐AF Sub ATM Functionality

SIA Safety Investigation Authority

SNAB Strategic Nordic Military ATM Board