Location Norwood School Crown Dale London SE19 3NY

Ward Knights Hill

Proposal Application

As Phase 2 of the London Borough of Lambeth Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme: The erection of a new performance hall with adjacent two-storey main reception and single-storey learning resource centre with terraced social space above fronting Crown Dale; the erection of a three-storey linking structure (disabled access compliant) facing the existing internal courtyard; the erection of a three-storey rear extension towards the north-western extent of the main building and other minor single-storey structures; remodelling, replacement and (where indicated) heightening of boundary walls and fences; new landscaping and ramp installation with the felling of 4 x trees towards the east of the site; remodelling and improvement of car parking layout; the installation of covered and non-covered cycle parking provision; remodelling of existing games courts to provide multi use games areas (MUGAs) along with other minor alterations all in order to facilitate an increase in attending pupils of up to 1000.

Applicant Mr M. Pocock

Agent Mr Sui-Te Wu: Barron And Smith Limited 3 Maltings Place, 169 Tower Bridge Road, London SE1 3JB

Date valid 20 April 2010

Case Officer Mr Andrew Byrne Application

Reference

10/01336/RG3

Recommendation(s) Grant Planning Permission subject to Conditions

Constraints Flood Zone Area 1

Advert Publication Date

30 April 2010

Site Notice posted on

30 April 2010

Submitted Drawings Submitted Documents

Site Location Plan and drawings reference numbers 0909 - 0001 rev A, 0002 rev B, 0004, 0005 rev B, 0006 rev B, 0007 rev B, 0008 rev A, 0010 rev L, 0011 rev J, 0012 rev J, 0013 rev B, 0020 rev F, 0021 rev C, 0022 rev A, 0023 rev A, 0030 rev D, 0031 rev D, 0032rev B, 0033rev B, 0040 rev B, 0060, 0061rev C, 0062rev C, 0063rev A, 0064, 0065rev A, 0066, 0067, 0068, 0069, 0070, 0071, 0072, 0200rev A, 0201rev B, 0303rev A, 400revA. Supporting Planning Statement - Design and Access Statement (and Landscape Strategy)– Flood Risk Assessment- Transport Statement

– School Travel Plan – Sustainability Statement – Tree Survey – Ground Conditions Report – BRE compliant Daylight / Sunlight and overshadowing Assessment – Statement of Community Involvement – School management Plan - Nature Conservation Assessment/Survey - Noise and Vibration Assessment – Secure by Design Statement – Statement on Refuse Storage / Recycling/Waste Management Strategy – Method of Construction Statement.

1 Summary of Main Issues The main issues arising from this application are summarised as follows:-

(i) The acceptability of the principle of the proposed development for school purposes;

(ii) The impact of the proposed development on the amenity of neighbouring residents and the local area;

(iii) The acceptability of the design, scale, landscaping, and appearance of the proposed development and its impact on the local area;

(iv) Access and the transport implications of the proposed development. (v) Impact on community safety and crime prevention (vi) Impact on wildlife habitat

2 Description of the Site and Surrounding Area 2.1 The application site is Norwood School, built as a girl’s school in 1968, it is a

state sector, community, comprehensive school, funded through the London Borough of Lambeth. The school is located on a site of approximately 0.15ha, situated on the north side of Crown Dale, between its junctions with Unity Close to the west and Elder Road and Stable Mews to the east, in West Norwood. The rear of the school is bounded by Pondfield House access road. Residential properties form part of the east and west boundaries. The school is located near the Borough boundary, The London Borough of Croydon is on the opposite (southern) side of Crown Dale.

2.2 The buildings within the school site are mainly of three storeys in a modern

movement style of concrete frame with single glazed steel framed ribbon windows over Grey Stock brickbands externally. The school’s main teaching and administrative blocks comprise a series of interlinking three storey blocks and a stand alone sports hall. A concrete covered cloister forms the entrance, and creates a brick paved courtyard to the main southern block. The school is in relatively good order structurally, and has been well maintained. However, it suffers from the problems inherent with this style of building such as heat loss and gain due to poor thermal insulation, poor ventilation, and poor acoustics. The topography of the site has a marked change in level across its width with stepped terrace changes of up to 1.5 m. The buildings are set in a series of terraced blocks to cope with the sloping site, which falls from west to east and south to north. The sports hall is set down some 1.5m from the courtyard on the east side, and is reached by external covered stairs from the courtyard. With no lifts within the school buildings, there are currently accessibility problems along the main circulation routes and between floors. There are several external play areas within the school grounds including; an external courtyard to the east of the main entrance, a multi use games area (MUGA) located in the north-east corner of the site, a hard surfaced playground to the south of the sports hall (set at a lower level to the courtyard) and informal grassed and soft play areas along the tree lined western and south-western boundaries of the school grounds.

2.3 The school caters for boys and girls and currently has 750 pupils between the

ages of 11-16 years. There are 83 full-time and 42 part time staff. Students travel mainly from Brixton, Streatham and Vauxhall with some from the neighbouring boroughs of Croydon, Bromley, Southwark and Lewisham. School hours are as follows: School open for staff 07.00, School open for Pupils 08.00 – 08.50, School ends- 15.20, School site closes – 18.30.

2.4 Norwood School has been designated as a Specialist Performing and Visual Arts College. It offers classes in drama, dance, music and art and regularly runs half-term, weekend and holiday activities including revision courses and performing arts programs that are open to the local community.

2.5 The main pedestrian access and school entrance is from Crown Dale.

However, many students use the access on Elder Road as it is closer to bus stops. Vehicular access is principally from Elder Road, leading to a small staff car park at the rear of the school. Outside the site, predominantly two storey dwellings lie to the north and west, with a more recent flatted development to the east. The main entrance is on Crown Dale road which runs west-east, and has a relatively steep incline.

2.6 The existing car park has 56 spaces including a disabled parking bay. This

access (Stable Mews) is currently shared with the existing residential development. The surrounding area to the north in Pondfield House road, to the northeast on Elder Road and to the west in Unity Close is predominantly residential in character. There is also a terrace of residential properties to the south of the school grounds, which back onto the hard-surfaced school games court yard and front onto Crown Dale. There is a medical centre to the south west of the site and St Joseph’s Infant School is located directly opposite the site on the south side of Crown Dale, within the boundaries of the London Borough of Croydon.

2.7 There are mature trees on the site, which are predominantly located along the

western and northern perimeter of the site. To the east of the site, near the Elder Road entrance, are two Willow trees which are subject to a Tree Preservation Order.

2.8 The site is not situated in a Conservation Area however the north end of the

site is adjacent to the Elderwood Conservation Area (CA20). No buildings within the school grounds are listed. The Elderwood Conservation Area (CA20) contains a number of Grade II Listed buildings (Nos. 5-65 and 67-71 Elderwood Place)

2.9 Crown Dale, onto which the school fronts is a London Distributor Road. The

road slopes down from west to east, east bound traffic is relatively busy. The road carries a bus service (No. 417). Elder Road is a Local Distributor Road Class “C”, which carries traffic and a bus service (No. 432) and also provides the school with both pedestrian and vehicular access via the residential access road of Stable Mews. Pondfield House road is an access road providing emergency access from the rear.

2.10 Within the local area, in addition to Norwood School, Virgo Fidelis Girls

Secondary School, and St Joseph’s Primary School are located on the opposite side of Crown Dale. In addition St Joseph’s Boys Secondary School is located at the top of Crown Dale near Crown Point. Within this context bus services (no. 417 along Crown Dale and no. 432 along Elder Road) become congested with school children during school opening and closing times.

2.11 Tivoli Road, which is 80 metres to the west of the school is designated in the

UDP as part of the extensive Lambeth Cycle Network. 2.12 Norwood Park, on the eastern side of Elder Road opposite the school

entrance, is designated in the Unitary Development Plan as a Site of Local

Nature Conservation Importance and is within a Green Chain. The school site is located within a green chain of open space linking Norwood Park, and (within LB. Croydon) the playing fields of Virgo Fidelis School and Upper Norwood Recreation Ground.

2.13 The Environment Agency’s flood map indicates that the site lies within Flood

Zone 1 area, which is deemed as having a 1 in 1000 chance of river or sea flooding in any one year.

3 Planning History 3.1 On 10.06.2002 planning permission was granted for - Enclosure and

extension of the existing ground floor undercroft area and the erection of 3 metre high fence to north boundary and associated alterations (ref 02/00724/FUL)

3.2 On 08.09.2005 planning permission was granted for Repositioning of existing

entrance screen at secondary entrance foyer to school building to create a display area and installation of new disabled access ramp and handrail to external staircase, along with associated alterations (ref 05/02045/FUL)

3.3 On 1.10.2008 Outline planning permission was granted for - Outline planning

application to determine access, layout and scale in respect to the erection of a two storey extension fronting onto Crown Dale, erection of a new three storey extension on the northern side of South Block and erection of a three storey lift shaft to the south of North Block ( ref 08/02531/OUT).

3.4 On 1.10.2008 Outline planning permission was granted for- Outline planning

application to determine access, layout and scale in respect to demolition of the existing south block and erection of a part three storey, part two storey block and erection of a three storey lift shaft to the south of north block. (ref08/02509/OUT).

3.5 On 01.12.2008 planning permission was granted for – Erection of a two storey

extension including a roof terrace to the south western corner of the existing school buildings to provide art and dance studios with changing rooms, plant and stores along with replacement of existing ramped access at new location along with landscaping involving the removal of trees and the erection of new retaining walls. (ref 08/03087/RG3). This development, which is located on the front elevation of the school, is nearing completion.

3.6 On 17.05.2010 an application was received for ‘Demolition of existing school buildings with erection of two 2-storey buildings and 3 single storey toilet blocks to provide temporary classrooms on the western side of Stable Mews’ (ref 10/01744/RG3). This application remains to be determined.

4 Scheme Details 4.1 Phase 2 ‘Building Schools for the Future’ is a national initiative aimed at lifting

educational attainment through the complete transformation of England’s secondary schools. This 10-15 year programme will see new schools built and existing schools upgraded to meet the needs of communities in the 21st Century. Local Authorities working in partnership with Government and the private sector will undertake this investment in new and enhanced educational

facilities. It is anticipated that the number of pupils would increase from 750 to 1000.

4.2 The key design objectives of the proposed development are;

- New identity with new buildings to the street frontage, strengthening the school identity. - Integrated school grounds - Access for all - Community use and Involvement.

4.3 The application is for full planning permission for partial demolition and

extensions to Norwood School building and alterations within the existing school grounds. The proposals comprise:-

(i) Demolition of part two storey part three storey frontage building

with a footprint of 26m x 23.6m. The two storey element is 25 m to the north west of the end of terrace house at No. 73 Crown Lane. Also demolition of a single storey covering to a sheltered walkway, in part adjacent to the north west corner of 73 Crown Lane.

(ii) Erection of part single part two storey building fronting Crown

Dale This would incorporate the site of the demolished frontage building. The single storey element would accommodate a new library and be 4.8 metres from the western side boundary of No. 73 Crown Dale, compared with a distance of 20 metres from the existing two storey element to be demolished. The proposed two storey element would be 13 metres from the western side boundary of No. 73 Crown Dale. The two storey element would accommodate a new performance hall, entrance lobby, reception and ancillary rooms on the ground floor and drama studios, sixth form rooms and sixth form roof terrace on the first floor. This roof terrace would be 11 metres x 7 metres and would be approximately 7 metres to the north west of No. 73 Crown Dale. The terrace would have a screen around its outer perimeter approximately 1.8 metres high to prevent overlooking of neighbouring properties. The performance hall with drama studios above would have a frontage elevation 13.4 metres wide, which would project 12 metres forward of the existing building line and would have an elevational treatment that is intended to form a distinctive prominent visual feature at the front of the school that would be a statement of the function of the School as a Specialist Performing and Visual Arts College.

(iii) Erection of a three storey extension within the site It is

proposed to extend the existing three storey school building, sited immediately behind the proposed new frontage building, eastwards by 5 metres. This extension would provide for larger rooms and improved circulation space, with the introduction of lifts, to all three floors and would link with the proposed new frontage building. This extension would face towards the existing, retained court yard and the sports hall beyond. In addition a three storey rectangular extension with a footprint of

7.8 metres x 6.6 metres is proposed within a recess towards the north western part of the main three storey building.

(iv) Erection of single storey structures The erection of three

modest single storey extensions to the existing school buildings are proposed. Two of these extensions would be located towards the northern end of the main school block. One is a single toilet the other is a store room approximately 4m x 4m. The other extension is for a electricity sub-station located at the eastern end of the existing sports hall and also approximately 4m x 4m.

(v) Access, Boundary Treatment, Car parking and Cycle parking

The main entrance fronting Crown Dale would remain pedestrian only. The proposed boundary treatment together with the siting and design of the new building would give the school more of a visual presence in the street scene. The proposed new boundary fence along Crown Dale would be 2.4m high of metal grill. The school gates with bespoke internal metal work (This is to be designed in collaboration with the school through competition). The gates are to include intercom, electronic remote control automated sliding mechanism. The main vehicle access to the site will remain from Elder Road where the gates are to be widened. This would serve the school car park / cycle park, which would accommodate a total of 52 car parking spaces (a reduction of 7 spaces) and 122 cycle parking spaces. The existing car parking area to the north of the sports hall would be reduced in size but extended to the east of the sports hall. To improve pedestrian access across the site from the Elder Road entrance to the Crown Dale entrance the land would be graded to form slopes to avoid the necessity of stairs. Unity Close provides a side service access 1.8m wide to the west of the site. At the rear of the site the access road to Pondfield House provides rear access for emergency and service access and would provide access for development construction purposes. Along the eastern western and northern site boundaries the proposed boundary treatment comprises 2.4 metre high metal grill or mesh galvanised and powder coated coloured black.

(vi) Landscaping. Numerous plants / flowers and shrubs within the

site are proposed. As a consequence of improving accessibility and regrading of land levels it is proposed to remove line of four cherry trees, which are at right angles to the rear site boundary. To the north and western corner of the site. The submitted drawings indicate the provision of new trees and to the north east remodelling of existing games courts to provide multi use games areas (MUGAs).

(vii) External lighting will be improved and updated along the eastern

site boundary. Lights to the sports pitches, to the south and rear of 73 to 93 Crown Dale, would be placed either side of the sports pitches. Lighting is also proposed to the Crown Dale entrance. In addition lighting is proposed within the site towards its centre and around the emergency access gates at the rear

onto Pondfield House access road. All proposed external lighting remains to be detailed.

(viii) CCTV Existing CCTV will be improved and updated to suit

different and new arrangements and enhance general surveillance and site security

(ix) Sustainable development A line of ten solar panels 10.5m x

2.4m is proposed on the flat roof of the existing sports hall. In addition it is proposed to provide a biomass boiler with ancillary storage area of 51m2.

5 Consultation Responses 5.1 Consultation letters were sent to neighbouring properties in the following

roads Unity Close; Pondfield House, Elder Road; Crown Dale; Elderwood Place, Longmead House, Woodvale Walk and Tivoli Road

5.2 The following amenity groups and external bodies were consulted

Dulwich Residents’ Associations – No response received to date Dulwich Society – No response received to date Crystal Palace Community Association–No response received to date

Transport for London - Comment no objections subject to conditions London Borough of Croydon – No response received to date

Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment– No response received to date Environment Agency Comment – no objections subject to conditions English Nature Comment – no objections OFSTED – No response received to date Sport for England No objections London Wildlife Trust– No response received to date London Ecology Unit-– No response received to date

5.3 Letters of notification were sent to the following internal Council consultees:

Planning Policy - Comment no objections Urban design – Comment no objections subject to further details Arboricultural Officer - No objections Sports - No objections Crime Prevention Unit - No objections subject to conditions Regulatory Services - Noise Pollution-Comment no objections Streetcare – No response received to date Performance, Strategy & Regeneration - Comment no objections subject to conditions Street Management – No response received to date

Transport and Highways Comment no objections subject to conditions

Education – No response received Implementation – No response received Lambeth Disability Sports Project – No response received

5.4 Letters of notification were sent to 599 neighbouring properties on the

following roads:- Unity Close; Pondfield House, Elder Road; Crown Dale; Elderwood Place, Longmead House, Woodvale Walk and Tivoli Road

5.5 Four site notices were erected in the vicinity of the site on 30 April 2010 and the application was advertised in the South London Press on the 30 of April 2010.

5.6 Three letters of objection have been received from neighbouring residents.

The following is a summary of the objections and the officers’ response.

Number of letters sent 599

Number of objections received 3

Number of letters of support received

0

Objections Response

1 With regard to 73 Crown Dale, the proposed development would be very imposing and would result in a loss of privacy to bathroom and bedroom from roof top terrace. Lack of clear screening details.

1 The proposed nearby building would be single storey with no roof terrace directly overlooking neighbouring residential properties. The proposed roof terrace would have a 1.8 metre privacy screen to prevent overlooking.

2 Proposed development with increased children, extended hours, loss of landscaped fence, to the rear of 73 to 93 Crown Dale, and construction operations would result in extra noise.

2 The proposal would remove a walled garden area where pupils gather adjacent to the side boundary of no.73 Crown Dale and provide an accessway. Subject to a recommended condition this would allow the Local Planning Authority to restrict its use, thus reducing existing noise levels to neighbouring residents. Noise from construction operations in the main are controlled by the Control of Pollution legislation rather than Town Planning.

3 Proposed development would result in increased overshadowing, loss of sunlight.

3 The proposed development would comply with BRE Guidance and would not result in unacceptable overshadowing or loss of natural light.

4 Proposed development would result in loss of an existing fence that provides mature vegetation providing a substantial visual and acoustic screen habitat for foxes and birds. Fence can be retained, or relevant condition retaining and enhancing as much as possible.

4 A condition is recommended that would provide for retention of the vegetation covered fence to the rear of 73 -93 Crown Dale. Proposed boundary treatment is the subject of a recommended Condition (No. 4) which requires the submission and approval of details.

5 Construction work, vibration and drilling would cause structural damage to nearby buildings

5 Unacceptable vibration is not anticipated other than in connection with removal of the play ground hard /paved surface. This would be associated with building operations , which are not considered material in the assessment of the proposal.

6 Concern that the proposed building would be over dominant over bearing. East west elevation drawing should be provided to help assessment.

6 It is not considered that the proposed single story library would result in an undue sense of enclosure or be overbearing.

7 It would have been appropriate for applicants to have consulted nearby neighbours in advance of finalising proposals and submitting the application.

7 Applicants Statement of Community Involvement indicates that a leaflet was distributed on 16 April 2010 providing details of a meeting at Norwood School on 26 April 2010.

6 Planning Considerations 6.1 Relevant Policies 6.1.1 National Guidance Central Government advice is contained in a range of

Government Circulars, Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPG) and/or Planning Policy Statements (PPS). These contain general policies, which aim to guide local planning authorities in securing good local planning policies based on real and sound objectives and the need to provide high quality, well thought out and sustainable developments, which make a positive contribution to the locality and which help to protect or enhance the environment. The following national guidance is considered particularly relevant to this application: Planning Policy Statement 1 [Delivering Sustainable Development] PPS1 sets out the Government's overarching planning policies on the delivery of sustainable development through the planning system. It states that good design is indivisible from good planning and encourages planning authorities to secure high quality and inclusive design for all development. It provides that planning authorities should:

“promote urban and rural regeneration to improve the wellbeing of communities, improve facilities, promote high quality and safe development and create new opportunities for the people living in those communities…” (para 27(ii)) and;

“Promote the more efficient use of land through higher density, mixed use development and the use of sustainably located previously developed land and buildings…” (para 27(viii)) It further states that planning authorities should, “Ensure that suitable locations are available for industrial, commercial, retail, public sector (e.g. health and education), tourism and leisure developments, so that the economy can prosper.” (para. 23)

Planning Policy Guidance 13 [Transport] PPG13 deals specifically with transport, particularly the way in which transport integrates with planning. PPG13 seeks to: promote sustainable transport choices; promote accessibility to jobs, shopping, leisure facilities and services by public transport, walking, and cycling; and, reduce the need to travel, especially by car. The Guidance encourages the location of traffic generating uses close to public transport, to encourage sustainable transport modes. PPG13 also encourages the production of travel plans to raise awareness regarding the impacts of travel decisions. PPG17 [Sport and Recreation] PPG17 prohibits development over existing open space and sport and recreation grounds unless an assessment has demonstrated that they are surplus to requirement. In which case, development may provide the opportunity to exchange the use of one site for another to substitute for the loss.

Planning Policy Statement 22 [Renewable Energy] PPS22 sets out the Government's policies for renewable energy, which planning authorities should have regard to when preparing local development documents and when taking planning decisions.

Planning Policy Guidance 24 [Planning and Noise] PPG24 guides local authorities in England on the use of their planning powers to minimise the adverse impact of noise. It outlines the considerations to be taken into account in determining planning applications both for noise-sensitive developments and for those activities which generate noise. Planning Policy Statement 25 [Development and Flood Risk] The Environment Agency’s flood map indicates that the site lies within Flood Zone 1 area, which is deemed as having a 1 in 1000 chance of river or sea flooding in any one year. PPS25 is to ensure that flood risk is taken into account at all stages in the planning process to avoid inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding, and to direct development away from areas at highest risk.

6.1.2 The London Plan (Amended 2008)

London Plan was consolidated in February 2008 and now includes alterations that have been made since it was adopted in February 2004. The London Plan is the Mayor’s development strategy for Greater London and provides strategic planning guidance for development and use of land and buildings within the London region.

It seeks to accommodate significant growth in ways that respect and improve London’s diverse heritage while delivering a sustainable world city and, proposes to achieve this through sensitive intensification of development in locations well served by public transport.

All Borough plan policies are required to be in general conformity with the London Plan policies.

The key polices of the plan considered relevant in this case are: 3A.24: Educational facilities 3C.1: Integrating transport and development

3C.2: Matching development to transport capacity 3C.3: Sustainable transport in London 3C.22: Improving conditions for cycling 3C.23: Parking strategy 3D.6: Sports facilities 3D.14: Biodiversity and nature conservation 4A.22: Spatial policies for waste management 4A.3 Sustainable Design and Construction 4A.4: Energy assessment 4A.7: Renewable energy 4A.20: Reducing noise and enhancing soundscapes 4B.1: Design principles for a compact city 4B.3: Enhancing the quality of the public realm 4B.5: Creating an inclusive environment 4B.8: Respect local context and communities

In particular Policy 3A.24 is relevant in this case as it states that UDP policies should reflect the demands of pre-school, school and community learning facilities, taking into account GLA demographic projections, and should ensure adequate provision in partnership with the local education authority, local strategic partnership and users.

6.1.3 Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)

The current up to date statement of the Council's planning policies is contained in the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan adopted on 6th August 2007. Together with the London Plan, this forms the statutory development plan for the Borough and is now used to determine all planning applications.

The following policies are considered particularly relevant to this application:

Policy 1: The Vision for Lambeth Policy 5: The Sequential Approach to Uses which Attract a lot of People Policy 7: Protection of Residential Amenity Policy 9: Transport Impact Policy 10: Walking and Cycling Policy 14: Parking and Traffic Restraint Policy 26: Community Facilities Policy 31: Streets, Character and Layout Policy 32: Community Safety/Designing Out Crime Policy 33: Building Scale and Design Policy 34: Renewable Energy in Major Development Policy 35: Sustainable Design and Construction Policy 36: Alterations and Extensions Policy 38: Design in Existing Residential/Mixed Use Areas Policy 39: Streetscape, Landscape and Public Realm Design Policy 50: Open Space and Sports Facilities Policy 52: Protection and Enhancement of the Natural Environment Policy 54: Pollution, Public Health and Safety Policy 56: Waste Policy 57 Planning Obligations

6.1.4 Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs)

The following adopted SPDs are considered to be relevant: Sustainable Design and Construction (July 2008) Safer Built Environments (April 2008) S 106 Planning Obligations (July 2008)

6.2 Land Use 6.2.1 Policy 3A.24 of The London Plan and the broad aims of government policy for

skills and learning, are informed by the recognition that poor educational attainment, skills and education deficiencies will have adverse social-economic effects within an area.

6.2.2 Policy 26 of the UDP supports and promotes the development and

improvement of community facilities, having regard to the Council’s statutory duty to provide a high standard of education. In particular, supporting text to the policy notes that in some parts of the Borough there is a shortage of places and/or lack of choice of schools. There is also additional demand that is likely to come from the high rate of new housing and the rapid demographic growth and high birth rate within the Borough. The policy states that through the planning process:

“… the Council will sustain a diverse and strong local economy and maximise education, skills and training opportunities for Lambeth residents…”

6.2.3 Therefore the principle matter for consideration in this case is whether there is

demonstrable need for the new facility having regard to both government stated policy aims for skills and learning and current educational deficiencies with the Borough.

6.2.4 In January 2003 the then government published its vision for transforming the

way the education system caters for young people in a report titled: ’14-19: Opportunity and Excellence’. The report set out a process of reform so that all pupils acquire skills for life, work and further learning. The report highlighted the low take-up of further education by 16 year olds and states:

“A significant minority – particularly those most at risk through personal or family circumstances or with low parental aspirations or support, drop out of education altogether. Many never return. Instead they head for low-skill, low-paid jobs or drift into unemployment…”

6.2.5 The government seeks to narrow the skills’ gap by making sure that young

people stay on in education and training, have a wider choice of flexible learning routes including academic study, vocational training or a combination of both and providing higher standard and greater choice of 6th Form and vocational training facilities.

6.2.6 There is an acknowledged shortage of schools in the Borough as a whole. In

2005, 41% of parents sent their children to schools outside the Borough. In response, the Council has set an objective of significantly increasing the proportion of Lambeth’s secondary age children who are educated in the Borough to at least 80% by 2016/17 as one of the outcomes to be achieved through the Transforming Secondary Schooling Programme. In the shorter

term this will be delivered in part through incorporating some expansion of existing schools into the Building Schools for the Future Programme (BSF) as is proposed in this case.

6.2.7 UDP Policy 26 states that proposals for large community facilities serving

more than a neighbourhood or district function, including the extension of existing facilities, should be located either: (i) in the first instance in town centres or in the Central London Activities Zone; or (ii) if there are no suitable and available sites in town centres, then other sites in accordance with the sequential approach (Policy 5 of the UDP).

6.2.8 The site does not lie within the Central London Policy Area or within a town

centre. Given there are no suitable sites within town centres in the vicinity, and given the established use of the site, it is considered that the proposal to expand provisions within the school would be consistent with the Policy 5 and 26 of the UDP in this respect.

6.2.9 The existing school is a large community facility serving more than a local

area. It educates students from years 11-16. Currently approximately 750 children attend the school. Recent approved schemes have allowed for an increase in the school roll to a total of 1,000 students, including new 100-place 6th Form Centre.

6.2.10 It is considered that, together with the recently permitted and the existing 6th

form colleges in the Borough, the proposed development would contribute to the stated education objective of reversing the out migration of post-primary school pupils from the Borough to other boroughs. However, in order for the extended specialist performing and visual arts program to be viable, existing and new pupils would need to be attracted back to Lambeth by the provision of a high quality and vibrant facilities. This scheme proposes to provide such facilities and is therefore considered acceptable in principle.

6.2.11 Part (i) of Policy 26 states that proposals for new or improved education

facilities will be permitted provided that the site or buildings are appropriate for their intended use, and that the nature and scale of the proposal including hours of operation, do not unacceptably harm the amenities of the area through noise, disturbance or traffic generation.

6.2.12 The following section (Design and Conservation) assesses the

appropriateness of the scale and layout of the proposal against Polices of the UDP. The proposal has also been assessed having regard to its impact on the amenity of local residents (Policies 7, 26 and 33 of the adopted UDP). The impact on the amenity of neighbouring residents and the transport and crime prevention implications of the proposal are considered along with other issues in detail in subsequent sections.

6.2.13 The proposal to extend the school is considered acceptable in principle in planning policy land use terms given the established use of the site.

6.3 Design and Conservation Considerations 6.3.1. Guidance given in PPS1 states that good design is indivisible from good

planning, with high quality and inclusive design being the aim of all of those involved in the development process. Unitary Development Plan Policies 32,

33, 34, 35 and policy 47 (because the site is adjacent to a Conservation Area) are particularly relevant to this application

6.3.2. Policy 33 of the UDP relates to building scale and design and provides that all

development should be of a high quality design and contribute positively to its surrounding area. Development should respond to the context and sensitivity of the site and area. Specifically, major development should:

• Relate satisfactorily to adjacent townscape taking into account its scale, character, historic street layout and uses;

• Improve the sense of place and legibility and define edges by retaining characterful buildings, appropriate building lines and extending frontages;

• Provide servicing and parking that is sensitively sited and designed. 6.3.3. Policy 31 of the UDP states that developments should respond to and

enhance the architectural character of the area. Where possible, development should retain and contribute to a fine 'urban grain', and where appropriate, follow appropriate block widths, road widths, plot sizes and gaps and spaces between buildings. Policy 38 states that proposals to intensify existing residential/mixed use areas are welcome where this can be achieved without harming local amenities, and that any prevailing character and appearance of the area should be protected. Policy 39 states that attention should be paid to the design of the areas between buildings enhancing the setting, connections and spaces between buildings. Trees of high amenity value will be protected.

6.3.4. The Council’s Urban Design officer has observed that it is clear that the

proposed layout has been well considered and has taken into account accessibility and movement within the school. The atrium would become the heart of the building providing direct links to other parts of the building and open spaces. Introducing buildings closer to the street increases the schools presence in the streetscene, which is considered suitable to its civic function. The splayed elevation of the Learning Resource Centre (LRC) draws the eye towards the new entrance/ lobby, resulting in a highly visible entrance.

6.3.5. The massing of the new parts of the building appears sound and relates well

to the existing buildings, the Urban Design officer has expressed concerns about the detailing and choice of materials for the performance hall and the three storey extension towards the north-western extent of the main building. In the context of the other buildings on the site the three storey extension would be a distinctive dark brick box. Concerns raised about the dark bricks compatibility with the predominately yellow stock brick building, about its impact on the street and the achievement of the relief/design detail shown on the brickwork, may be resolved in the approval of details of facing materials, which are reserved by condition.

6.3.6. Since Crown Dale is the principle entrance for students and the community it

is important that a high quality boundary treatment is constructed. The proposal includes bespoke fence panels (Orsogril – Pleone) above the existing brick wall, sliding gates, and a full height metal grill fence (Orsogril – Pleone). The submitted perspective drawing (No. 303) shows a dwarf brick wall with railings instead of full height metal grill fence. It is considered that it would be preferable to have a dwarf wall with a type of railing treatment, to

the required height on top. This would create a visually consistent boundary treatment along the frontage.

6.3.7. The proposed development would be relatively remote from the Elderwood

Conservation Area and associated listed buildings to the north east of the site. It is considered that the proposed development would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area and listed buildings.

. 6.3.8. In conclusion it is considered that the proposed development’s size and siting

is acceptable in design terms. Concerns about the proposed facing materials and boundary treatment remain to be resolved. This can be dealt with by means of proposed Conditions which require the submission and approval of details, including facing materials and boundary treatment.

6.4 Amenity Impact

Impact on amenities of Neighbouring properties 6.4.1 Policy 7 of the Lambeth UDP relates to the protection of residential amenity.

It states that the right of people to the quiet enjoyment of their homes will be respected. “In predominantly residential areas the establishment of a new, or intensification of an existing, incompatible non-residential use, likely to have a materially adverse environmental and/or traffic impact, will not be permitted”.

6.4.2 Policy 33 of the Lambeth UDP states that development should protect the

residential amenity of existing and future residents by:

i. having an acceptable standard of privacy; ii. having an acceptable impact on levels of, and impact on daylight and sunlight; iii. not creating unacceptable overlooking; iv. not creating an undue sense of enclosure; and v. where appropriate, having sufficient outdoor amenity space.

6.4.3 Policy 54(e) states that noise and/or vibration generating development will not

be permitted if it would create, or worsen, noise levels above acceptable levels set out in national policy guidance (PPG 24).

6.4.4 In this instance the impact of the proposed development on the amenity of

neighbouring properties in the main concerns the relationship between the proposed redevelopment in the area of the school entrance and reception on Crown Dale and the nearby terrace of two storey houses, Nos. 73 to 93 Crown Dale to the east of this area.

Overlooking and Privacy

6.4.5 The proposed development would result in a single storey building,

accommodating the LRC, with an eastern elevation located 4.8 metres from the western side boundary of the residential two-storey dwelling at No. 73 Crown Dale. At present this is an open amenity area. The proposed LRC would have a large window overlooking the retained ball games area of the school which is located to the rear of the terrace 73 to 93 Crown Dale. It is considered that obscure glazing to a southern part of this window together with the provision of vegetation covered 4 metre high boundary treatment

along the rear boundary of the neighbouring terrace of houses would be sufficient to safeguard existing residential privacy in respect of this window.

6.4.6 On the roof above the proposed LRC would be a first floor roof terrace (11

metres x 7 metres) for sixth form students. This would be accessed by two doors leading to and from the sixth form area. The terrace would be located 6 metres north west of the rear garden of 73 Crown Dale. The terrace would have a screen, 1.8 metres above adjacent floor level, around the outer perimeter. This would prevent overlooking of neighbouring properties.

6.4.7 The proposed first floor windows in the eastern elevation would be set back

and overlook a central part of the school rather than neighbouring properties. 6.4.8 At the rear of the residential terrace nos. 73 to 93 (odd) Crown Dale is a 4.5

metre high chain link fence. This is a rear boundary which is the responsibility of the school who propose that it be renewed. The existing fence supports well established dense vegetation of the neighbouring residents, which is entwined along the entire length of the fence. The retention of the existing fence would have value in that it provides a functional privacy screen, acoustic barrier, and habitat for wildlife.

6.4.9 It is considered that it would be impractical to disentangle the established

dense vegetation from the existing chain-link fence replace the fence and replace the retained vegetation on the proposed new fence. To provide entirely new vegetation as compensation would leave the rear of these properties exposed for a period whilst the proposed new vegetation establishes. Therefore, officers recommend that this element of the existing boundary treatment be retained. This would be achieved through the submission of a detail, attracted by condition, which would indicate the retention of this existing boundary.

6.4.10 It is proposed to erect a 3 metre high rebound fence within the school to the

nearby ball games area. This rebound fence would run parallel to the vegetation laden boundary fence. Again, no evidence has been submitted to indicate that this fence is in poor condition and that this fence and that that it is necessary for it to be entirely replaced. To some extent the fence is protected from weathering by the existing dense vegetation. In light of the above considerations and in response to the Urban Design officers concerns mentioned above, and residents objections concerning the loss the existing vegetation laden boundary fence along the rear boundary of 73 to 93 Crown Dale, a condition is recommended that notwithstanding indications on the submitted drawings further details of boundary treatment be submitted for approval.

6.4.11 In light of the above it is considered that the proposed development, subject

to recommended conditions (Nos. 4 and 29) would not result in unacceptable overlooking or loss of privacy to neighbouring properties.

Sunlight and Daylight

6.4.12 The impact of the development on natural light to neighbouring properties arises entirely from the proposed single storey, with a two storey element set further back LRC, located directly parallel to the western boundary of the end of terrace house at No. 73 Crown Dale. This terrace has modest rear gardens some 11 metres long and 5 metres wide. At present there is no

school building running alongside this boundary. The proposed single storey element would be 4.8 metres from the boundary and approximately 7 metres above the height of residential rear gardens nearby. The proposed two storey element would be 13 metres from the boundary and approximately 10 metres above the level of the nearest residential rear garden.

6.4.13 The angle from the middle of the ground floor rear windows of No. 73 Crown

Dale to the top of the proposed single and two storey buildings would be approximately 41O and 29O respectively. The angle from the middle of the first floor rear windows of No. 73 Crown Dale to the top of the proposed single and two storey buildings would be 29O and 24O respectively. As such the proposal would comply with the BRE test of not exceeding 450 in elevation and plan above nearby windows, which would be at right angles to the development, albeit that this is usually applied to rear extensions.

6.4.14 The applicant has submitted a ‘Daylight/Sunlight and Overshadowing

Assessment’. This concludes that whilst the proposed development would result in a slight reduction in the availability of sunlight to the rear of 73 and 75 Crown Dale, they would remain higher than the BRE minimum requirements for daylight levels as set out in ‘Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight-A guide to good practice by P. J. Littlefair 1995. The overshadowing study showed a slight increase in overshadowing to the rear garden of 73 Crown Dale during the afternoon. The increase is less than 25% covering of the amenity space at any given time, which lies within the parameters set out by the BRE Guidelines which indicates that this reduction would not be to such a degree so as to demonstrate harm.

6.4.15 Within the context described above it is considered that the proposed

development would have a negligible impact on received natural day and sunlight on neighbouring adjacent dwellings fronting Crown Dale, and in this regard, the impact of the proposal is considered to be acceptable and policy compliant.

Sense of Enclosure

6.4.16 As a result of the proposals the area of open space within the school site

would be reduced from 11,570m2 to 10, 625 m2, a reduction of brownfield land of approximately 8%. Generally it is considered that the relatively small reduction in area would be compensated by improvement in the quality of space. No UDP designated open space would be lost permanently to the proposal.

6.4.17 The main impact in terms of increasing the sense of enclosure would occur

near the western end of the terrace of houses 73 to 93 (odd) Crown Dale. As already mentioned here a single storey building 6 metres above site level approximately 7 metres above neighbouring residential garden level would be within 4.8 metres of the side boundary of no. 73 Crown Dale, and a two storey element to this building would be 9 metres above site level and approximately 10 metres above nearest residential rear garden would be 13 metres from the side boundary of no. 73 Crown Dale. Although the school building can be seen from the rear gardens of this terrace the existing front building line of the school in the main does not extend forward of the rear boundary of Nos. 73 to 93 Crown Dale. With the proposed ground floor development the school, set back 4.8 metres from the boundary, would almost fill the gap presently occupied by open school land, between the existing school and the rear of the

terrace of houses 73-93 Crown Dale, at the western end of the rear gardens of the terrace. At first floor level the proposed development would be set back 13 metres from the end of terrace garden boundary. This would project approximately 5 metres forward of the rear boundary of the rear garden. The sense of enclosure therefore arises in the main from the proposed single storey ground floor LRC building, which is approximately 6 metres high but is on a ground level that is approximately 1 metre higher than the existing garden level of No. 73 Crown Dale.

6.4.18 The existing terrace faces across Crown Dale to open land, associated with

separate school use on the opposite side of Crown Dale. To the rear/ north the windows of the houses face towards a screen of vegetation. The LRC would be sited to the side (western extent) of these residential properties. No windows face directly towards the proposed new development at the western end of the terrace. The proposed new single storey LRC building would be set back 4.8 metres from the site boundary with the neighbouring property at 73 Crown Dale. In addition the existing school walk-way canopy, in part adjacent to the side boundary of no. 73 Crown Dale and overbearing on it, would be removed.

6.4.19 Within the context described above it is considered that in this instance the

proposed development would on balance not create an undue sense of enclosure to neighbouring residents and is acceptable in this regard.

Noise and Disturbance 6.4.20 Policy 7 protects residential amenity and states the right of people to the quiet

enjoyment of their homes will be respected. The policy goes on to state that in predominantly residential areas the establishment of a new, or intensification of an existing, incompatible non-residential use, likely to have a materially adverse environmental and/or traffic impact, will not be permitted.

6.4.21 In this case, it is considered that the following sources would be likely to give

rise to potential noise and vibration concerns:

-Noise during the demolition and/or construction phases; -Additional traffic noise and general school activity generated within the new build area; -Proximity of new build to existing residential properties; -Possible increase in ‘after hours’ use of school facilities Demolition and Construction Noise

6.4.22 Noise associated with construction is in the main governed by the Control of

Pollution Act 1974. In this case, the occupiers of the adjacent properties in Crown Dale would be likely to be the most affected by demolition and construction works.

6.4.23 The applicant’s have submitted a Method of Construction Statement. This indicates that in the early phases of construction the contractors controlled area would be to the rear of the site with access from Pondfield House access road. It is considered that by following the guidance and best practice in relation to demolition and construction, appropriate noise mitigation could be implemented. To ensure that such measures are implemented, it is recommended a condition requiring the submission of an additional method of

construction statement be attached to any approval, to ensure that the disruption to residents is minimal. This would indicate measures to ensure the air pollution, noise would be minimised. And would indicate construction vehicles parking, storage and hours of operation. To ensure that demolition and construction causes the minimum of disruption it is recommended that contact details of a nominated contact for local residents be clearly displayed on Pondfield House road, Crown Dale and Elder Road.

Noise from students and other school users

6.4.24 The applicant anticipates that the number of pupils attending the school is

proposed to increase from 750 to 1000. In addition, being a community school, adults would attend various courses at the school.

6.4.25 The operation of the school is set out in the submitted ‘School Management Plan’ This indicates hours of school use are as follows:- - The bulk of the school cleaning of the school takes place between 06.00 and 08.00am and 16.00 and 17.00pm - The school car park opens at 7.00am - The school is open from 8am; formal lessons end at 3.20pm. No pupil is allowed off-site during break or lunch. - After school clubs and additional classes and use of the sports hall are up to 5pm. Twelve members of senior school staff are on duty at the end of the day as pupils are dismissed to ensure orderly departure from both Elder Road and Crown Dale entrances.

6.4.26 It is intended to develop community usage of the school. The following school facilities would be available for community activities at various times after school, at weekends and in school holidays as follows:- - Sports Hall: 18.00-22.00 Mondays to Fridays and 09.30 – 12.00 Saturday - Multi– use games area 08.00-18.00 Mondays to Fridays and 09.30 – 12.30 Saturday - Classrooms & Studios: 18.00-20.00 Mondays to Fridays and 09.00 – 12.00 Saturday -Learning Resource Centre: 09.30 – 12.30 Saturday. Access for community users would be through the school’s main entrance to sign in at reception. Access to the sports hall can be separate to the main school building.

6.4.27 The vast majority of deliveries are scheduled to arrive before 8am. And after 4pm. There is a CCTV monitored electronic gate at the Elder Road entrance and no students are allowed into the car park and delivery point.

6.4.28 The applicants have submitted a ‘Noise and Vibration Assessment’ This concludes that : - The building envelope and building services have been designed and assessed to ensure internal noise levels are compliant with requirements and suitable noise mitigation measures are suitable

- Activity noise from the school is not expected to increase as a result of the proposed development - Vibration is not known to be an issue in the school and is not expected to be of significance.

6.4.29 Within the existing school site is a place for pupils to assemble and play in the form of a walled garden, adjoining the western boundary of the rear garden of No. 73 Crown Dale. In the proposed development this would be replaced by a pedestrian access way which would run between the brickwall of the proposed library and the neighbouring rear garden. Whilst this may reduce noise from play during school time, compared with the walled garden, the use of this access may result in an increase in noise and disturbance with coming and going associated with use by pupils and the community during out of school hours. The use of this accessway remains to be clarified and safeguarding of amenity in terms of noise ensured by way of condition requiring submission and approval of a Community Management Plan, (ref recommended Conditions 12 and 13)

6.4.30 The Council’s Environmental Health team (Noise and Pollution) has raised no objection to the proposed development. Objections received from local residents concern noise arising from increased numbers of children, loss of landscape fence and from construction. In light of these objections and the above considerations, conditions are also recommended that would address the need for the submission and approval of further details of boundary fencing, use of proposed access path and method of construction and control internally generated noise associated with the proposed new visual and performing arts facility. (ref recommended Conditions Nos. 4, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 28 and 29)

6.4.31 In light of the above, and with recommended imposition of conditions should planning permission be approved, it is considered that the amenity of neighbouring properties would be safeguarded in this instance.

7.0 Highways and Transportation Issues 7.1 Policies 9, 10 and 14 of the UDP require developments to be assessed for

their transport impact on highway safety, contribution to traffic generation, impact on road congestion and public transport availability.

7.2 Crown Dale is a busy local distributor road and is also a primary route for emergency services. It is considered to be of strategic importance within the Borough. Elder Road is also busy with commuter traffic at peak times. The school is not situated within a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ).

7.3 The site has a poor level of public transport accessibility (PTAL score of 2).

The submitted Travel Plan (2009) states that the catchment for pupils attending the school includes Brixton, Streatham and Vauxhall with some students also coming from neighbouring boroughs of Croydon, Bromley, Southwark, Wandsworth and Lewisham.

7.4 Policy 14 of the UDP states that parking and access to schools shall be

assessed on a case by case basis. It is considered that the proposed works would not create undue parking stress on the surrounding road network.

7.5 Trip Generation The current school role is for 750 pupils aged 11 – 16 with

83 full-time and 42 part-time staff and following the proposed development this would increase to 1000 pupils and 111 full time staff and 56 part time staff. The most relevant measure of existing travel patterns at the school is contained within Norwood’s School Travel Plan (STP) which sets out that current modal splits as follows;

Table 1 – Current Modal Split of trips to Norwood School

BUS WALK CAR CYCLE TRAIN

PUPIL (%)

70 16 6 7 1

STAFF (%)

8 17 57 9 9

By using the figures contained in the above table the applicant is able to predict the likely increases in the use of the various forms of transport as a result of the development. The table below sets out the additional numbers of the new pupils (250) and new staff (42) using each form of transport to travel to school.

Table 2 – Likely increase in trips to Norwood School by mode

BUS WALK CAR CYCLE TRAIN

PUPIL (No.)

175 40 15 18 2

STAFF (No.)

3 7 24 4 4

Whilst these figures can not be considered completely accurate they do give a good estimate of how the extra journeys will be made. From a Lambeth Highways perspective the only potential impact on the Borough’s road network is that of the 39 extra car trips to the site but it is considered that this small increase would not have any impact on the operation or safety of the surrounding network and no further analysis of these car trips are needed. Transport for London (TfL) are responsible for assessing the impact of any new developments on the operation of the bus network and they have been consulted on these proposals and have provided comments described in paragraphs 7.11 to 7.14 below. The small increases in Walking, Cycling and Train trips to the site do not pose any issue to the highway network and do not warrant any further analysis.

7.6 Car Parking The existing school has a provision of 52 staff car parking spaces

and 7 visitor spaces including a disabled bay making a total of 59 on-site spaces. It is proposed to reduce this to 49 spaces with 3 additional disabled spaces. It should also be noted that Lambeth’s Parking team is currently working on proposals to introduce a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) within the surrounding area in this financial year and this coupled with the reduction in on-site parking provision should discourage staff from driving to the school site possibly reducing the number of additional car trips predicted in Table 2 above. In terms of car parking the development is considered to be acceptable.

7.7 Cycle Parking The current provision of cycle parking at Norwood School is

low with only 10 spaces provided and this could be one of the reasons behind the low level of cycling at the school with only 7% of pupils and 9% of staff using this means of transport. As part of the development the school would provide 20 covered spaces for staff, 16 uncovered spaces for visitors and a further 86 spaces for students with 56 of these covered. Further details of this is recommended to be secured by condition.(recommended Condition No.24)

7.8 Road Accidents The applicant has undertaken a review of accidents that have occurred within the vicinity of the school within the past 3 years to identify if any existing safety concerns could be exacerbated by the increase in pupils attending the school site. The results show that in this period there were 4 accidents involving children of school age at times of day corresponding to travel to or from school, two of which resulted in ‘Serious’ injury and two in ‘Slight’ injury. There is no real pattern to these 4 accidents although 3 did occur near to the junction of Crown Dale and Beulah Hill (approx 400m to the west of the school) with the other accident located at the junction of Elder Road and Norwood Park Road. From looking at the overall accident history of the area it is apparent that there is a higher than average number of accidents taking place in this area and this is acknowledged by the fact that there is a Local Safety Scheme (LSS) being designed and implemented this year to reduce the number of accidents in the area. From discussions with the Engineer responsible for this scheme it is felt that the proposed LSS will significantly improve the pedestrian environment for pupils and staff but that a financial contribution of £20,000 is sought towards implementing this scheme.

7.9 Highway Alterations The Council’s Transport Planning Officer states that the

school must update it’s School Travel Plan to reflect the changes to the school as a result of the development. The present School Travel Plan raises concerns over the lack of provision of a formal crossing point between the school site and a bus stop on the eastern side of Elder Road that is very well used by pupils coming to and from school. This is recognised as a safety concern with pupils observed stepping off the bus and crossing immediately behind the bus often through relatively fast moving traffic and it is a concern that any increase in pupils using this bus stop would increase the risk of an accident happening here. To address this it is proposed to slightly relocate the bus stop and to install a Zebra crossing at this point which would provide a formal crossing point for pupils using this bus stop. As a consequence it is considered that a contribution of £20,000 would be required for the used towards the installation of this Zebra crossing. This could be secured through condition.

7.10 In light of the above mention considerations the Council’s Transport Planning

Officer raises no objections to the proposed development subject to; (i) Contribution of £20,000 towards installation of Zebra crossing on Elder

Road (recommended Condition No. 30) (ii) Provision of proposed cycle parking to be ensured by Condition before occupation of the proposed development(shown on plans) (recommended

Condition No. 24) (iii) Submission and approval of an updated School Travel Plan

(recommended Condition No. 25)

7.11 In response to consultation Transport for London (TfL) confirms their support for the proposed reduction in on site parking from 59 to 52 spaces and the proposed provision of 122 cycle parking spaces. TfL state that showers, lockers and changing facilities should be made available for both staff and students.

7.12 TfL note from the school Travel Plan that bus services on both the 417 and

432 routes serving the school are currently overcrowded, and the increase in pupil numbers will exacerbate this.

7.13 TfL have requested that a Construction Logistics Plan (CLP) should be secured by condition on any consent. This should identify efficiency and sustainability measures to be undertaken while the development is being built, including booking systems, consolidated or re-timed trips, secure, off-street loading and drop-off facilities, details of traffic management and using operators committed to best practice, demonstrated by membership of TfL’s Freight Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS), or similar. In particular, the CLP must demonstrate how conflict between pupils and construction vehicles will be managed (recommended Condition No. 26).

7.14 TfL confirm that subject to the above issues relating to bus demand being

addressed to TfL’s satisfaction, TfL would have no objections to the development.

7.15 In light of the above it is concluded that there are no objections in principle to

the proposed development in terms of Transport and Highway Issues. 8.0 Refuse and Recycling 8.1 Policy 56 of the UDP states development proposals should include adequate

provision within, or as part of the development, for refuse and re-cycled waste. The applicant’s have submitted ‘Statement on Refuse Storage/Recycling/Waste Management Strategy.

8.2 The main refuse store would be located close to the Elder Road entrance,

with a recycling bin store located close to the main school block as part of the delivery bay.

8.3 The Council’s Streetcare team was consulted and have not provided any

comments to date. If minded to approve, it is suggested that conditions should be placed to ensure that adequate facilities for the disposal of both general waste and any hazardous waste (e.g. from chemistry, art departments etc) and recycling are provided on site in accordance with Policy 56 of the Lambeth UDP (recommended Condition No. 16).

9.0 Designing out Crime

9.1 Policy 32 (Community Safety/Designing Out Crime) requires that development

should enhance community safety. Development will not be permitted where opportunities for crime are created or where it results in an increased risk of public disorder. Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 requires local authorities to take account of crime and disorder as part of all their functions.

9.2 The applicants have submitted a ‘Secure by Design Statement’ and proposals which are described in paragraph 4.3 (v) include new boundary fences, controls on entry gates and improvements and updating of external lighting. Passive surveillance will also be increased by careful siting of staff offices to ensure all areas are overlooked.

9.3 The area around the entrance from Elder Road is one of the remoter areas from the school building. At present this is over looked by the accommodation of the premises manager. As a result of the development this area would be overlooked by the referral unit, which would be located in the existing premises manager’s accommodation. In addition it is proposed that this area will be

securely locked during school hours. When open this area will be supervised by staff.

9.4 The Council’s Crime Prevention Design Officer has pointed out that existing

fencing and boundary treatment to the school is weak in areas and once in the grounds it is possible to walk all around the school with ease and it is very difficult to restrict access. When the buildings are unoccupied there is minimal natural surveillance or overlooking into the central courtyard area. Some neighbouring properties do partially overlook the school grounds, though these are is some distance away. Traditionally schools are most vulnerable to damage and burglary during weekends and holiday periods. This school has experienced instances of graffiti and damage to windows in the past though it is not a persistent problem.

9.5 During the school day certain break out areas experience lower levels of active supervision and overlooking and these are also the areas that are more vulnerable to incidents and anti-social behaviour occurring between pupils. There is an existing problem with children exiting the playground via the main entrance gate by pressing the release button. This issue has been addressed by securing the access / exit points and limiting access. Twelve members of senior school staff are on duty at the end of the day as pupils are dismissed to ensure orderly departure from both Elder Road and Crown Dale entrances.

9.6 In response to Consultation the Council’s Crime Prevention officer

recommends that should planning permission be granted it be subject to a conditions to ensure that the proposed development would be acceptable in terms of safety and crime prevention and would comply with UDP Policy 32 (recommended Condition No. 27).

10.0 Sustainability 10.1 Policy 34 (Renewable Energy in Major Development) of the Lambeth Unitary

Development Plan states all major developments are required to incorporate equipment for on-site renewable power generation so as to provide at least 10% of their predicted energy requirements. Policy 35 (Sustainable Design and Construction) states all development proposals should show, by means of a Sustainability Assessment, how they incorporate sustainable design and construction.

10.2 The proposed development includes a line of ten solar panels 10.5m x 2.4m is proposed on the flat roof of the existing sports hall. In addition it is proposed to provide a biomass boiler with ancillary storage area of 51m2. An associated ‘Sustainability Statement’ has been submitted.

10.3 With respect to Policy 34 the Council’s Environment Manager has confirmed that the proposals address the energy hierarchy and proposes 27qm of solar thermal, and a biomass boiler to provide an on-site renewables capacity delivering an approx 16% CO2 reduction over baseline figures. This exceeds Lambeth’s policy 34 requirement.

10.4 The Council’s Environment Manager considers that the applicant needs to

confirm that the design and site layout enables provision of adequate fuel storage for the biomass boiler, and that access for biomass fuel delivery and a sustainable supply chain has been considered. In light of this a condition is

recommended to ensure the renewable energy proposals are implemented (condition recommended 24)

10.5 With respect to Policy 35 Council’s Environment Manager states that the Breeam assessment achieves a credit rating of 63.62% and is therefore complaint in respect of policy 35 requiring Breeam ‘very good’. The minimum rating to achieve the required standard of very good is 55%. The credits noted are conservative based on design assumptions, and the report confirms that in several areas (i.e. health and well being, materials, land use and ecology) there is potential to obtain further credits pushing the project towards achieving Breeam excellent. The Environment Manager suggests that should planning permission be granted it be subject to a condition to achieve a minimum ‘very good rating’ via the BREEAM certification scheme (Condition No. 26 recommended)

10.6 Subject to the recommended Conditions it is considered that the proposed

development would be acceptable in terms of renewable development and sustainable design and would comply with UDP Policies 34 and 35 .

11.0 Landscaping, Ecology and Habitat 11.1 Policy 39 of the UDP states that trees of high amenity value will be protected,

including during construction, through the use of planning conditions and Tree Preservation Orders. The removal of, or major works to, trees of high amenity value will only be permitted where they are assessed as hazardous, causing proven structural damage to property or where it can be proven that a protected tree is unreasonably interfering with an individual’s enjoyment of his/ her property. Policy 52(c) states that ‘ Measures to enhance biodiversity will be sought as part of development schemes’ and ‘The linking of habitats through green corridors will be protected and promoted’

11.2 Numerous plants including trees and shrubs are proposed within the site. As a consequence of improving accessibility and regarding of land levels it is proposed to remove a line of four cherry trees, which are at right angles to the rear site boundary to the north and western corner of the site. The submitted drawings indicate the provision of new trees around the site boundary. The applicants have also submitted a landscaping report as part of the ‘Design and Access Statement. A ‘Nature Conservation Assessment/Survey’ has also been submitted. This recommends;- (i) The retention of trees and hedgerows on site, or if their loss is

unavoidable replacement planting on site. (ii) Sensitive timing of vegetation removal and an ecological clerk of

works to take account of species such as nesting birds, reptiles and mammals.

(iii) Ecological input be sought for any landscape plans or planting schemes proposed on the site in order to maximise the biodiversity potential of the proposed development

Soft landscaping

11.3 In response to consultation the Council’s Parks Projects officer (Communities and Education) expresses general support for the landscaping proposals and comments: that the proposed areas for landscaping, and the species proposed to be included, and the quantities and specifications are acceptable and these would be attractive to wildlife like bees, birds and bats. A condition

is recommended that planting and maintenance schedules are submitted and approved before the development is occupied (Recommended Condition No. 5).

11.4 It is considered acceptable for certain trees, of low amenity and ecological

value be removed. This would be compensated for by new trees forming part of the proposed landscaping works.

Ecology

11.5 Initial surveys suggest that the site’s ecological value is relatively low, and the proposed changes would appear to have minimal impact upon any protected species or habitats. Because the initial ecological surveys were undertaken in 2008, a further ecological survey and assessment should be undertaken before any site demolition, clearance and tree removal works commence. The survey would need to focus on any buildings or features which were highlighted in the original report as ‘high risk’ rather than having to cover the entire application site. Should bats or bat roosts be found during building demolition or stripping, these findings must be immediately notified to an appointed ecological advisor, the Council or Natural England, so that appropriate mitigation or protection measures can be put in place to prevent further destruction of or damage to any roosts, or any injuries or deaths of bats (Recommended Conditions 8 and 9).

11.6 Whilst the current site has relatively low ecological value, the applicant accepts that there is considerable potential to enhance the development for biodiversity through introducing features such as bird/bat boxes and bricks, or sensitive and appropriate landscaping and planting of trees and plants. Proposals for inclusion of items like bat bricks, or bird and bat boxes, on buildings or retained trees, would be welcome and this is strongly encouraged as part of the final landscaping specifications and schedules (Recommended Condition 7).

11.7 As the site has little green space enhancement of boundary hedges would increase the site’s current value to wildlife, provide habitat for local species and improve connectivity to the wider area and the ‘Green Chain’ (recommended Conditions 4 and 5)

11.8 In response to consultation English Nature state that after careful consideration of the information provided it is our opinion that this proposal does not affect any priority interest areas for Natural England and do not object to the proposal.

11.9 Appropriate conditions are also recommended to ensure that the retained

trees would be protected during demolition and construction works. In additions details of additional landscaping including planting of mature and semi-mature trees where appropriate are to be secured by condition. Accordingly it is considered that the proposal would meet the provisions of Policies 33, 39 and 52 of the UDP (Recommended Conditions 5, 17 and 18).

12.0 Flood Risk

12.1 The applicant has submitted a ‘Flood Risk Assessment’, which records that

the Environment Agency’s flood map indicates that the site lies within Flood Zone 1 area, which is deemed as having a 1 in 1000 chance of river or sea

flooding in any one year. Other sources of flooding have been investigated and are considered not to be significant. Surface water outflows from the redeveloped site will be restricted to match the existing flows. This would manage the peak run-off into the adjacent sewer network to acceptable rates and volumes, which will in turn help to significantly reduce flooding risk downstream of the site. The Applicant considers that by incorporating the above measures, the proposed development complies with the requirement of PPS 25 by protecting the users of the development and reducing the flood risk to third parties beyond the site.

12.2 The Environment Agency have reviewed the submitted risk assessment and state that the proposed development would only be acceptable if the following a planning condition to improve the existing surface water disposal system To prevent flooding is imposed: (Recommended Condition No. 28)

12.3 In addition the Environment Agency have also reviewed the ‘Ground Conditions Report’ submitted by the applicant and on the basis of this are satisfied that the proposal would not present an unacceptable risk to groundwater.

13.0 PLANNING OBLIGATIONS

13.1 UDP Policy 57 provides The Council will, where appropriate, for the Council to

enter into legal agreements with developers, and seek the attainment of planning obligations, having regard to current Government guidance. Examples of planning obligations that could be sought include:

• Improvements to the public realm, particularly for pedestrians (Policy 39);

• Contribution to public transport improvements to encourage access by means other than by car (Policies 9 and 13);

• The control of parking and other traffic management measures;

• Highway improvements (Policy 9);

13.2 The present School Travel Plan raises concerns over the lack of provision of a formal crossing point between the school site and a bus stop on the eastern side of Elder Road that is very well used by pupils coming to and from school. This is recognised as a safety concern with pupils observed stepping off the bus and crossing immediately behind the bus often through relatively fast moving traffic and it is a concern that any increase in pupils using this bus stop would increase the risk of an accident happening here. To address this it is proposed to slightly relocate the bus stop and to install a Zebra crossing at this point which would provide a formal crossing point for pupils using this bus stop. The requested £20,000 would be used towards the installation of this Zebra crossing which directly arises from the proposed development. These monies are recommended to be secured through the imposition of a Grampian style condition (Condition 30).

14.0 Conclusions 14.1 The development, which is part of Phase 2 of the Council’s Building Schools

for the Future, programme would benefit the children of the borough and local community through the provision of modern and specialised education facilities. The proposal to provide additional and improved education facilities

Norwood School is considered acceptable in principle in planning land use terms.

14.2 It is considered that subject to conditions the proposed scale, layout and design of the development pays appropriate reference to the scale of the existing school building and those in the surrounding area and as such the development would not adversely affect the character or setting of the local area and the nearby Conservation Area or listed buildings

14.3 It is considered that the siting, scale and layout of the scheme would not have

a materially adverse impact on the local environment or the amenity neighbouring residents.

15.0 Recommendation 15.1 Grant Planning Permission subject to Conditions Conditions 1 The development to which this permission relates must be begun no later than the

expiration of three years beginning from the date of this decision notice.

Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91(1)(a) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.)

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the

approved plans listed in this notice. Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 3 Prior to commencement of the development hereby approved, full details including

detailed drawings and samples and schedule of materials to be used in the elevations of the development, including: - Details of new windows to existing block - Details of new doors - Notwithstanding drawings provided the applicant must submit details of

auditorium façade treatment - Notwithstanding drawings provided the applicant must submit details of

the new block on the western elevation façade treatment - Notwithstanding drawings provided details of southern boundary

treatment should be provided. - Details/sections of new build on eastern elevation.

shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and this condition shall apply notwithstanding any indications as to these matters which have been given in the application. The development shall thereafter be carried out solely in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To safeguard and enhance the visual amenities of the locality. (Policies 33 and 39 of the Unitary Development Plan (2007) refer.)

4 Full details of new boundary walls/fencing and gates shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before any part of the development hereby approved is occupied/or brought into use. The approved

walls/fencing and gates shall be erected in accordance with the approved details and shall be maintained for the duration of the use.

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory appearance of the completed development in the interests of amenity of the locality and to safeguard the amenities of neighbouring residents. (Policies 31, 32 33, and 38 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

5 (1) No development shall take place until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority a detailed scheme of soft landscaping for the whole application site, including selection of species, planting plans and programmes and schedules for management and maintenance of these landscaped features. These proposals should include all new plantings of trees, hedges, grass, shrubs, ground flora or climbers, and cover all of areas of open space within the development. (2) All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the details of landscaping hereby approved (or the scheme of landscaping as would require minor amendment to accommodate the requirements of other conditions contained within this decision notice) shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding season following the occupation of the development hereby permitted or the substantial completion of the development, whichever is the sooner. Any trees, hedgerows or shrubs forming part of the approved landscaping scheme which within a period of five years from the occupation or substantial completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased, shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species, unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation.

Reason: To ensure that such works do not detract from the development itself or from the appearance of the locality in general and to ensure a satisfactory and a continuing standard of landscaping of the site in the interests of visual amenity and promoting bio-diversity (Policies7, 33, 39 and 52 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

6 Prior to the first occupation/use of the buildings or extensions hereby

approved, samples and specifications of all finishing materials to be used in any hard surfacing of parts of the site not covered by buildings shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority in writing. All hardsurfacing on the site shall thereafter be carried out solely in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To ensure that such works do not detract from the development itself or from the appearance of the locality in general (Policies 33 and 39 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

7 Prior to first occupation of the extensions hereby approved full details shall be

submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority of measures to encourage protected species to occupy and reside within the application site, such as through the installation of bat and bird boxes on retained trees and buildings, or bat bricks within new or remodelled buildings, or the creation of naturalised areas within proposed private and public open spaces.

Reason: To ensure that such works do not detract from the development itself

or from the appearance of the locality in general. (Policies 33 and 39 of the

Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)). 8 No demolition, clearance works or development shall take place until an up-

to-date habitat and protected species survey and assessment has been carried out submitted and approved by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that such works do not detract from the development itself or from the appearance of the locality in general. (Policies 33 and 39 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

9 The applicant/developer shall operate a ‘watching brief’ on the application site

as to protected species (especially bats and birds) during site demolition, clearance and construction phases. Reporting procedures shall provide for site staff and management to be alerted of findings of any protected species or their roosts/nests, and to report findings without delay to the Local Planning Authority, a qualified ecological advisor or Natural England so that effective mitigation or compensatory measures can be put in place to prevent the destruction or loss of any such species or their habitats. Reason: To ensure that the development does not have a significant adverse impact on protected and priority species. (Policy 52 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)) refers.

10 Full details of the lighting of all external areas, including any floodlighting of

the MUGA, shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before the use of the relevant parts of the site commence. The details shall include a specification of the lighting, location, lux values, hours of operation, details of light spillage and details of shielding to neighbouring properties. Light from the illuminaires shall not exceed 10 EV(lux) when measured at any window of a neighbouring residential premises and all luminaries shall be oriented and designed in such a way to minimise light spillage beyond the boundary of the site and to prevent glare into the windows of residential properties. The details of lighting for all external areas of the development site as approved shall be provided prior to the commencement of use of the relevant parts of the development and operated thereafter for the duration of the permitted use, unless the written approval is received from the Local Planning Authority for any variation.

Reason: So as to ensure a safe environment for future users and to reduce opportunities for crime, and in the interests of the design quality of the development; the character and appearance of the street scene; and/or the residential amenity of neighbouring properties (Policies 7, 26, 32, 33 and 54 of the London Borough of Lambeth’s Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

11 Full details of closed circuit television (CCTV) providing surveillance of external

spaces shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before any part of the development hereby approved is occupied/or brought into use.

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory appearance of the completed development in the interests of amenity of the locality and to safeguard the amenities of neighbouring residents. (Policies 31, 32 33, and 38 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007).

12 Prior to the first occupation/use of the buildings or extensions hereby approved, a detailed School Management Plan to indicate the use of the walkway along the western side of No. 73 Crown Dale shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be implemented and maintained in accordance with the approved School Management Plan.

Reason: To protect the amenity of neighbouring properties (Policies 7, 26 and 33 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)refer ).

13 Prior to the occupation/use of the buildings or extensions hereby approved, a

Community Use Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter, the development shall be implemented and maintained in accordance with the approved Community Use Management Plan.

Reason: In order to protect the residential amenity of the locality in accordance with Policies 7 and 26 of the Unitary Development Plan (2007).

14 Details of measures to be taken to contain internally generated noise, from

the building proposed to accommodate the performing arts facilities including acoustic treatment of windows and ventilation equipment, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before any part of the development hereby approved is occupied/or brought into use. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To safeguard the amenities of adjoining premises and the surrounding area (Policies 7 and 54 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

15 There shall be no amplified sound, speech or music which is audible outside any of the approved buildings, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To safeguard the amenities of adjoining premises and the surrounding area. (Policies 7 and 54 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

16 Refuse storage and recycling facilities for the development hereby permitted shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the London Borough of Lambeth's 'Waste and Recycling Storage and Collection Requirements: Guidance for Architects and Developers' (May 2006) and shall thereafter be retained as such for the duration of the permitted use, unless the prior written approval is obtained from the Local Planning Authority for any variations.

Reason: To ensure that adequate provision is made for the storage of refuse and recycling on the site, in the interests of the amenities of the area (Policies 9, 33 and 56 of the adopted Unitary Development Plan (2007) refers).

17 No trees other than those shown to be removed on the Approved Plan

Drawing No. 090 0060shall be felled, pruned, uprooted, damaged or otherwise disturbed without the prior written consent of the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure the retention of, and avoid damage to, the existing trees on or adjacent to the site that represent an important visual amenity to the

locality and wider area (Policy 39 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

18 Before any part of the development hereby approved commences, full details

of a scheme, in accordance with BS5837:2005, for the protection of the existing trees to be retained as identified on the Approved Plan Drwg No. AL9571A002 (Existing Site Plan) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The works thereby approved shall be fully implemented prior to construction on site and retained until development is completed.

Reason: To ensure the retention of, and avoid damage to, the existing trees on or adjacent to the site that represent an important visual amenity to the locality and wider area (Policy 39 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

19 The development shall not begin until provision has been made to

accommodate all site operatives', visitors' and construction vehicles loading, off-loading, parking and turning within the site during the construction period in accordance with details to be submitted and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To minimise danger and inconvenience to highway users (Policies 9 and 14 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

20 During the entire period of construction of the development hereby approved

contact details of a member of the construction team to act as a point of liaison if required, shall be prominently and legibly displayed on the boundary of the site for the benefit of residents wishing to discuss the impact of the development on residential amenities in the neighbouring area.

Reason: To ensure that residential amenity is safeguarded. (Policies 33, 36 and 54 of the Unitary Development Plan (2007) refer.)

21 Adequate precautions shall be taken during the construction period to prevent

the deposit of mud and similar debris on the adjacent public highways.

Reason: To minimise danger and inconvenience to highway users (Policies 9 and 14 of the Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

22 The development hereby approved shall be constructed to achieve a

minimum BREEAM rating of ‘Very Good’. A BREEAM post completion report and certificate that confirms BREEAM ‘Very Good’ has been achieved shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of use of the development, or in accordance with any other timetable as may be agreed with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: In the interests of securing a more sustainable development (Policies 1 and 35 of the Adopted Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

23 The development hereby permitted shall incorporate equipment for renewable power generation so as to provide at least 10% of the predicted energy requirements of the development, as outlined in the applicant’s Sustainability Statement. Full details of the proposed on-site renewable energy generation technologies i.e. the biomass boiler, shall be submitted to and approved by

the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of development and the development shall thereafter be constructed in accordance with the approved details unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Council. Reason: In the interests of securing a more sustainable development (Policies 1 and 34 of the Adopted Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

24 No part of the building hereby permitted shall be occupied or used until the

provision for cycle parking shown on the application drawings has been implemented in full and the cycle parking shall thereafter be retained solely for its designated use. Reason: To ensure adequate cycle parking is available on site and to promote sustainable modes of transport. (Policies 9, 10 and 14 of the Unitary Development Plan (2007) refer)

25 An up-dated Travel Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the

Local Planning Authority prior to the use hereby permitted commencing. The measures approved in the Travel Plan shall be implemented prior to the (a) use hereby permitted commencing and shall be so maintained for the duration of the use, unless the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority is obtained to any variation.

Reason: To ensure that the travel arrangements to the school are appropriate and to limit the effects of the increase in travel movements (Policy 9 and 26 of the Unitary Development Plan (2007) refer).

26 No development works shall commence on site until such time as a

Construction Logistics Plan has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Construction Logistics Plan shall identify efficiency and sustainability measures to be undertaken while the development is being built and must demonstrate how conflict between pupils and construction vehicles will be managed. The implementation of the development shall thereafter be undertaken only in accordance with the approved Construction Logistics Plan.

Reason: So as to secure efficient and sustainable measures to be undertaken during the construction process and to manage conflict between construction traffic and pupils (Policies 1, 9 and 35 of the London Borough of Lambeth’s Unitary Development Plan (2007).

27 The development shall be constructed and thereafter operated so as to achieve ‘Secured by Design Schools 2010’ accreditation. Evidence of such shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority within 3 months from the commencement of use of any of the buildings hereby approved, or within any other timetable agreed by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To reduce opportunities for crime as far as is reasonable in accordance with Policy 32 of the London Borough of Lambeth’s Unitary Development Plan (2007).

28 The development hereby permitted shall not be occupied until such time as a scheme to improve the existing surface water disposal system has been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. The

scheme shall be fully implemented and subsequently maintained, in accordance with the timing / phasing arrangements embodied within the scheme, or within any other period as may subsequently be agreed, in writing, by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To prevent flooding by ensuring the satisfactory storage of/disposal of surface water from the site and to reduce the risk of flooding to the proposed development and future occupants in accordance with PPS25.

29 No part of the flat roof area of the Learning Resource Centre, other than the

terrace for the sixth form, hereby approved, shall be used as a roof terrace, balcony, sitting out area or amenity area and the privacy screen around the perimeter of the sixth form terrace shall be fully installed before the building is occupied and retained and maintained at a minimum height of 1.8 metre above terrace finished floor level for the duration of the use.

Reason: To preserve the privacy and amenities of the adjacent property occupiers (Policies 7 and 33 of the Unitary Development Plan (2007) refer.)

30 The development hereby permitted shall be inclusive of ‘highway

improvement works’ to Elder Road comprising of the provision of a zebra crossing as part of improvement of pedestrian access to Norwood School, as part of Local Safety Scheme (LSS), No use of the new buildings hereby permitted shall commence until such time as the applicant has paid the Council’s Highway Authority a sum of £20,000 as a contribution for the carrying out of the highway improvement works, thereafter the Council Highway Authority shall carry out the works within a reasonable time period. Reason: To raise awareness of the presence of the school with drivers in the interests of highway safety (Policies 9 and 10 of the London Borough of Lambeth’s Unitary Development Plan (2007) refer).

31 No development shall commence on site until such time as a phasing plan for

the implementation of the development, together with indicative dates of the suspected commencement and completion of the various stages, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall thereafter be completed in accordance with the approved phasing plan, unless the written approval is received from the Local Planning Authority for any variation.

Reason: To ensure a holistic approach to the redevelopment of the site is adopted in the interests of minimising disturbance to the neighbouring residents (Policy 1, 7, 9, 26 and 33 of the London Borough of Lambeth’s Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

32 No development shall take place until a ‘Method of Construction Statement’

has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and construction works, including parking, deliveries and storage, shall take place solely in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To avoid hazard and obstruction being caused to users of the public highway and in the interest of public safety (Policies 1, 9 and 35 of the London Borough of Lambeth’s Unitary Development Plan (2007)).

Informatives 1. This decision letter does not convey an approval or consent which may be

required under any enactment, by-law, order or regulation, other than Section 57 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. Your attention is drawn to the provisions of the Building Regulations, and

related legislation which must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Council's Building Control Officer.

3. Your attention is drawn to the need to comply with the requirements of the

Control of Pollution Act 1974 concerning construction site noise and in this respect you are advised to contact the Council's Environmental Health Division.

4. Building products made from asbestos are liable to emit fibres especially

during construction, repair or demolition. These fibres are hazardous. There are strict regulations governing work with asbestos and you are advised to employ a contractor specifically licensed by the Health and Safety Executive to undertake work with materials containing asbestos. You are invited to contact the Council's Environmental Health Department for further advice.

5. You are advised of the necessity to consult the Principal Highways Engineer

of the Highways team on 020 7926 2620 or 079 0411 9517 in order to obtain necessary prior approval for undertaking any works within the Public Highway including Scaffold, Temporary/Permanent Crossovers, Oversailing/Undersailing of the Highway, Drainage/Sewer Connections and Repairs on the Highways, Hoarding, Excavations, Temporary Full/Part Road Closures, Craneage Licences etc.

7 You are advised to contact the Council's Sustainable Waste Officer on

telephone 0207 926 1000 regarding the Waste Management Plan requirements.

8 You are advised to consult the Council's Urban Design Officer (1st Floor, Phoenix House, 10 Wandsworth Road, London, SW8 2LL) with regard to the requirements of Conditions 3 and 4

9 You are advised to consult the Council's Crime Prevention Advisor (205 Stockwell Road, Brixton SW9 9SL) with regard to the requirements of Conditions 5, 6 and 12

10 With reference to Condition No 6 you are advised that landscaping schedules should include, measures to promote biodiversity including use of native species that are typical of locality and ground conditions or any naturalised areas to maximise the site’s landscape, visual and horticultural quality, ease of maintenance and to provide long-term biodiversity and environmental benefit.

11 Lambeth Parks is willing to advise on any schedules to ensure the planted areas are well maintained and enhance the quality of the development and its surroundings.

12 Natural England recommended that should planning permission be granted the following may be of use with regard to measures to enhance the natural environment;

Design for Biodiversity http://www.d4b.org.uk/ Biodiversity by Design http://naturalengland.communisis.com/naturalenglandshop/docs/TCP1.pdf Right Trees for a Changing Climate http://www.right-trees.org.uk/ Adapting to Climate Change: A Checklist for Development http://www.london.gov.uk/lccp/publications/development.jsp