logical fallacies. syllogism (not a fallacy) a logical argument presented in terms of two statements...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Logical Fallacies
![Page 2: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Syllogism (not a fallacy)
A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements are true.
EX: A-Mammals are warm blooded. B-Dogs are mammals. C-Therefore, dogs are warm blooded.
![Page 3: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Syllogisms continued
Major Premise: A-Mammals are warm blooded.
Minor Premise: B-Dogs are mammals. Conclusion: C-Therefore, dogs are warm
blooded.
![Page 4: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Logical Fallacies
Fallacies are statements that resemble a logical argument but are actually flawed.
They are often persuasive, but they (unfairly) manipulate the audience in order to win agreement.
An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect inference.
![Page 5: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
“Begging the Question”
Making a statement that assumes that the issue being argued has already been decided.
![Page 6: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Ad Hominem (“Against the Man”) Attacks
Simply put, these are personal attacks. Attacking the arguer rather than the
argument.
![Page 7: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hasty or Sweeping Generalization
Drawing conclusion from insufficient evidence, or applying a conclusion too broadly.
![Page 8: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
False Dilemmas
Also known as the Either/Or Fallacy. Simplifying a complex problem into an
either/or dichotomy.
![Page 9: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Red Herring
When an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the main topic being argued.
“Changing the subject”
![Page 10: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
“You Also” (Tu Quoque)
A logical fallacy that tries to discredit an argument by asserting that since the arguer does not abide by their argument, the argument is invalidated.
A presents argument x A does not abide by argument x. Therefore, x is not true. A type of ad hominem.
![Page 11: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Post Hoc Reasoning
A logical fallacy that involves looking back at two events that occurred in chronological order and wrongly assuming that the first event caused the second.
![Page 12: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Non Sequiturs
“It does not follow” Using irrelevant premises to buttress a
conclusion. The conclusion does not logically follow from
the premises.
![Page 13: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Distorting Statistics
It is what it sounds like.
![Page 14: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Faulty Use of Authority
Failing to acknowledge disagreement among experts or otherwise misrepresenting the trustworthiness of sources.
![Page 15: Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649eb45503460f94bbbbb0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Straw Man Argument
Disputing a view similar to, but not the same as, the view of one’s opponent.
Misrepresenting the other argument, attacking that misrepresented argument, and thinking you have attacked the real argument.
Attacking a weak defender of an argument and acting as if the entire argument has been defeated.