london borough of croydon office, industrial and warehousing land/premises market ... · 2020. 6....
TRANSCRIPT
Final Report
London Borough of Croydon
Office, Industrial and Warehousing
Land/Premises Market Assessment
Prepared for:
London Borough
of Croydon
Prepared by:
URS Corporation
Limited
In association with:
Stiles Harold
Williams
August 2010
London Borough of Croydon
Office, Industrial and Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment
August 2010 Final Report Issue No 3 49353249
LB Croydon Office, Industrial and Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page iii
49353249
Project Title: London Borough of Croydon Office, Industrial and Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment
Report Title: Final Report
Project No: 49353249
Status: Final Report
Client Contact Name: Dominick Mennie
Client Company Name: London Borough of Croydon
Issued By: Gregory Openshaw
Document Production/Approval Record
Issue No: 3 Name Date Position
Prepared by Jon Howells 18th June 2010 Urban Planning Consultant
George Whalley 18th June 2010 Senior Regeneration Consultant
Prepared and checked by
Gregory Openshaw
9th August 2010
Senior Regeneration Consultant
& Project Manager
Reviewed by Anthony Batten 18
th June 2010
Quality Assurance
Approved by Rory Brooke 6
th July 2010
Project Director
Document Revision Record
Issue No Date Details of Revisions
1 18th June 2010 Draft Report
2 6th July 2010 Final Report
3 9th August 2010 Final Report (correction of typographical errors)
LB Croydon Office, Industrial and Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page iv
49353249
LIMITATION
URS Corporation Limited (URS) has prepared this Report for the sole use of London Borough of Croydon Council in accordance
with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the
professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by us. This Report may not be relied upon by any
other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments
made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be used for their current purpose without significant change. The
conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the
assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested. Information
obtained from third parties has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated
objectives of the services. The results of any measurements taken may vary spatially or with time and further confirmatory
measurements should be made after any significant delay in using this Report.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial and Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page v
49353249
CONTENTS
Section Page No
ABBREVIATIONS......................................................................................................................VIII
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................. IX
1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 21
1.1 Context and Purpose ..................................................................................................... 21 1.2 Study Area...................................................................................................................... 21 1.3 Report Structure ............................................................................................................. 22
2 APPROACH................................................................................................................... 25
2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 25 2.2 Policy Context and Socio-economic Profile ................................................................... 25 2.3 Survey of Employment Sites and Premises................................................................... 26 2.4 Market Analysis .............................................................................................................. 31 2.5 Consultation ................................................................................................................... 31 2.6 Employment Land Forecast ........................................................................................... 31 2.7 Gap Analysis .................................................................................................................. 31 2.8 Consideration of Sites for Redevelopment .................................................................... 31 2.9 Conclusions and Recommendations.............................................................................. 32
3 POLICIES AND LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................... 33
3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 33 3.2 National Policy................................................................................................................ 33 3.3 Regional Policy............................................................................................................... 36 3.4 Local Policy .................................................................................................................... 42 3.5 Summary........................................................................................................................ 50
4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 52
4.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 52 4.2 Population ...................................................................................................................... 52 4.3 Deprivation ..................................................................................................................... 53 4.4 Labour Market Structure ................................................................................................ 55 4.5 Company Size and Registration..................................................................................... 57 4.6 Industrial Structure ......................................................................................................... 58 4.7 Inward investment .......................................................................................................... 61 4.8 Home-working ................................................................................................................ 61 4.9 Summary........................................................................................................................ 63
5 QUALITY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EMPLOYMENT LAND – ‘LOCAL’ OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSING ............................................................. 65
5.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 65 5.2 Employment Clusters ..................................................................................................... 65 5.3 Cluster Suitability for B1a Land-use............................................................................... 67
LB Croydon Office, Industrial and Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page vi
49353249
CONTENTS
Section Page No
5.4 Cluster Suitability for Industrial Land-use ...................................................................... 71 5.5 Summary of Employment Clusters outside the CMC..................................................... 77
6 QUALITY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EMPLOYMENT LAND – CMC OFFICE CLUSTERS...................................................................................................... 79
6.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 79 6.2 CMC Clusters Surveyed................................................................................................. 79 6.3 Access to Public Transport ............................................................................................ 80 6.4 Access to Quality Facilities and Amenities .................................................................... 81 6.5 Quality of Environment and Building Stock.................................................................... 82 6.6 Physical or Planning Policy Constraints......................................................................... 84 6.7 Intensity of Existing Use................................................................................................. 85 6.8 Summary of CMC Clusters ............................................................................................ 87
7 MARKET ANALYSIS..................................................................................................... 89
7.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 89 7.2 CMC Market Overview ................................................................................................... 89 7.3 CMC Office Market and Comparator Centres................................................................ 91 7.4 CMC Demand Characteristics........................................................................................ 96 7.5 CMC Supply Characteristics ........................................................................................ 100 7.6 CMC Property Market Outlook ..................................................................................... 102 7.7 CMC Market Conclusions ............................................................................................ 103 7.8 Local Office, Industry and Warehousing Market Overview.......................................... 104 7.9 Local Office Market Demand and Supply Characteristics ........................................... 105 7.10 Local Office Market Outlook......................................................................................... 105 7.11 Local Industrial and Warehousing Market.................................................................... 106 7.12 Local Industrial Market Outlook.................................................................................... 110 7.13 Local Market Conclusions ............................................................................................ 111
8 CONSULTATIONS WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS..................................................... 112
8.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 112 8.2 Business Accommodation Demand and Supply .......................................................... 112 8.3 Labour Force Structure ................................................................................................ 113 8.4 LB Croydon as a Place to do Business........................................................................ 113 8.5 Economic Downturn ..................................................................................................... 114 8.6 Priorities for Policy........................................................................................................ 114
9 EMPLOYMENT LAND FORECASTING ..................................................................... 116
9.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 116 9.2 Forecast Approach....................................................................................................... 116 9.3 Property Market Areas ................................................................................................. 116 9.4 Employment Forecasts ................................................................................................ 117 9.5 Adjustment of Macro-Economic Demand .................................................................... 120 9.6 Other Factors Impacting on Employment Growth........................................................ 121 9.7 Comparative Advantage Assessment.......................................................................... 122 9.8 Summary of Local Factors ........................................................................................... 127
LB Croydon Office, Industrial and Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page vii
49353249
CONTENTS
Section Page No
9.9 Summary of Floorspace Forecast ................................................................................ 128 9.10 Other Relevant Employment Land Uses...................................................................... 129 9.11 Summary of Employment Land Forecast..................................................................... 130
10 REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ............................................................................... 132
10.1 Clusters Best Suited for Redevelopment ..................................................................... 132 10.2 Gross and Net Potential Floorspace ............................................................................ 133
11 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 139
11.1 Conclusions.................................................................................................................. 139 11.2 Proposed Policy Direction ............................................................................................ 141
APPENDIX A – EMPLOYMENT CLUSTER QUESTIONNAIRE.............................................. 149
APPENDIX B – CROYDON METROPOLITAN CENTRE QUESTIONNAIRE ......................... 154
APPENDIX C – CONSULTATION TOPICS ............................................................................. 157
LB Croydon Office, Industrial and Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page viii
49353249
ABBREVIATIONS
AAP Area Action Plan
AMR Annual Monitoring Report
CAZ Central Activities Zone
CMC Croydon Metropolitan Centre
DCLG Department for Communities and Local Government
DfT Department for Transport
DPD Development Plan Documents
GIS Geographic Information System
GLA Greater London Authority
JSA Job Seekers Allowance
LB London Borough
LDD Local Development Document
LDF Local Development Framework
LPMA Local Property Market Area
ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
PIL Preferred Industrial Location
PPG Planning Policy Guidance
PPS Planning Policy Statements
PTAL Public Transport Accessibility Levels
RSL Registered Social Landlords
SIC Standard Industrial Classification
SIL Strategic Industrial Locations
SME Small and Medium sized Enterprise
SLFPMA South London Fringe Property Market Area
SPG Supplementary Planning Guidance
Sqm Square Meters
UDP Unitary Development Plan
VAT Value Added Tax
VOA Valuation Office Agency
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page IX
49353249
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Context and Purpose
URS, together with Stiles Harold Williams, were commissioned by the London Borough of Croydon
(LB Croydon) in April 2008 to undertake an employment land review to assess the quantity, quality
and viability of employment land throughout the Borough.
The need for such studies has been emphasised in the DCLG’s (Department for Community and
Local Government’s) Planning Policy Guidance Note (PPG) 3 (Housing) of January 2005, and most
recently in the June 2010 PPS3 publication, as well as the PPS4 (Planning for Sustainable
Economic Development). PPS4 identifies how local authorities should manage land supplies to
cater for different business needs while remaining flexible to changing economic and business
requirements.
The methodology of this study is in line with the DCLG’s Guidance Notes on Employment Land
Reviews (2004). This guidance suggests the main scope of Employment Land Reviews to focus on
the B use class orders, that is B1 (Business), B2 (General Industrial) and B8 (Storage or
Distribution) and wider employment uses such as land accommodating waste management and
recycling, public transport functions (land for rail and buses) and utilities.
This study will form part of the Council’s evidence base for the emerging Local Development
Framework (LDF) policies as required by Planning Policy Statement 12 (PPS12: Local Spatial
Planning).
Geography of Assessment
The study area included the whole of LB Croydon. There are two main employment areas in the
borough. In the centre-west, lies the Croydon Metropolitan Centre (CMC) – a Strategic Office
Location recognised in the London Plan – which contains the majority of B1a office floorspace in
the borough, with a notable presence of large employers from the public sector as well as financial
and business services, engineering/construction occupiers. The CMC is also the focus of five
masterplan proposals, which together make up a large proportion of the CMC and hold the
potential to bring significant economic and developmental change to the centre of Croydon.
Outside the CMC are employment areas Purley Way and Marlpit Lane, in the west and south of the
Borough, which are industrial areas allocated in the London Plan as Strategic Industrial Locations
(SILs). These contain general industrial, light industrial and warehousing uses (use classes B1b/c,
B2 and B8). There are also a number of other important local employment areas dispersed through
the borough as well as some small pockets of unallocated industrial land, mostly consisting of
single premises or small industrial clusters.
In total 16 employment clusters in the CMC were surveyed and 21 employment clusters outside the
CMC were surveyed. In Section 2, Figures 2.1 and 2.2 identify the location of employment clusters
and Table 2.1 and Table 2.2 list them by name.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page X
49353249
Approach
A number of research elements enable the development of a comprehensive employment land
strategy for the borough. Our approach is set out in Figure 1 below and explained in greater detail
in Section 2 of the report.
Figure 1: Approach to the Employment Land Review
Supply
Employment and business profiling
Employment land surveys
Consultation (stakeholders)
Policy And Socio-Economic Context
Planning Policy
Economic Development
Socio-Economic Analysis
Gap Analysis/ Conclusions
The difference between supply
and demand
Demand
Employment land market
analysis
Employment land forecast
Consultation (stakeholders)
Strategy
Policy Recommendations
Strategy
Supply
Employment and business profiling
Employment land surveys
Consultation (stakeholders)
Policy And Socio-Economic Context
Planning Policy
Economic Development
Socio-Economic Analysis
Gap Analysis/ Conclusions
The difference between supply
and demand
Demand
Employment land market
analysis
Employment land forecast
Consultation (stakeholders)
Strategy
Policy Recommendations
Strategy
Policy and Literature Review
An overview of the policies and strategies relevant to employment and employment land in LB
Croydon with respect to national, regional and local policy is set out in Section 3.
Socio-economic analysis and business profiling
It is useful to consider current demand and future provision of employment land in the context of
the socio-economic structure of the area: planning for sustainable communities includes providing
for employment suitable to the local workforce.
Latest figures record 218,600 residents are of working age in LB Croydon (equivalent to 64% of the
population). Of these approximately 81% are economically active, which is slightly higher than
London average (75.5%).
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XI
49353249
The workforce occupation breakdown for Croydon indicates that a large proportion of the
population, approximately 47.1%, are employed in managerial, professional and associate
professional occupations, though this is smaller than London (52.8%).
October 2008 to September 2009 the unemployment rate in Croydon was 8.1%, which is the
highest rate of unemployment witnessed in the borough since February 1997.
The average gross weekly earnings for residents is £566.70, which is significantly lower than the
Greater London average workplace earnings and helps to drive out-commuting, though the majority
of residents work within the borough itself (54.8%).
The contribution of small businesses to employment in the borough is sizeable, with businesses
employing one to ten employees, accounting for 85% of its registered businesses and
approximately 26,600 jobs. However, it is the larger organisations which are the dominant
employment providers. The public sector is a key industrial sector, which accounts for 29.9% of all
borough employment, and has grown by approximately over 50% between 1998 and 2008.
Employment Land Survey
URS conducted a field survey and desk based appraisal of the identified employment clusters (as
per Figure 2.1 and Figure 2.2, see Section 2) in LB Croydon. These appraisal criteria were set by
the consultants and agreed with the Council.
Our assessment of supply of employment land has included a review of clusters’ suitability for
office (B1) and industrial (B2/B8) land-uses. Owing to the different site characteristics required by
office (B1a) and industrial (B1b/c, B2 and B8) users, the analysis assessed cluster suitability for
these use classes separately. In addition, cluster suitability for accommodating SME workspace
were also assessed, to fit with the aspirations of supporting entrepreneurship, business start up
and growth. An example of differing requirements is that B1 land users usually require better
access to public transport than industrial (B2/B8) land users who require better access to strategic
roads. The assessment criteria and questionnaires used are held as Appendices A and B.
As discussed there were two surveys undertaken: a review of clusters outside the CMC (B1, B2
and B8), comprising 248.5ha of land; and a review of clusters located in the CMC (B1a office)
comprising 49.9ha of land.
The former review found that the borough’s current supply of Strategic Employment Areas and
other Employment Areas is considered to be in healthy condition. Many office clusters displayed
characteristics which define good optimal locations for B1a. Clusters had good or very good access
to public transport, facilities and amenities, and that the condition of buildings and public realm
quality within clusters was generally considered to be good or very good. With respect to industrial
land use suitability, the borough contains several strategic (TLRN) roads and few clusters exhibited
bad neighbour issues with surrounding land use. Though inadequate servicing arrangements were
considered to be generally adequate or better on these clusters, parking was an issue in eight
clusters. The survey identified 6.4ha of vacant or derelict land.
Regarding the CMC the majority of clusters were identified as having good or very good access to
public transport networks or access to facilities or services. Survey’s highlighted the poorer quality
of public realm in and around the west and mid Croydon masterplans areas with high proportions of
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XII
49353249
poor quality or outdated (pre 1970s) building stock, and the core of the CMC, in terms of
marketability, located around George Street and Wellesley Road. Nine sites, dispersed across the
CMC area, contained either vacant developable land or derelict buildings, with few sites displaying
physical features which would restrict development intensification. Focused along Wellesley Road,
five clusters were identified as having low building height relative to their surroundings or spatial
location.
Tables 5.12 and 6.10 provide a summary of results presented in Section 5 and 6 of the quality and
characteristics of the Employment Clusters outside the CMC and CMC clusters, respectively.
Property Market Analysis
Stiles Harold Williams covered a review of the CMC Office (B1a) Market, covering the South
London Fringe Property Market Area (SLFPMA). The CMC office market was deemed to cater for
the needs of larger occupiers with a wider area of search for business accommodation, including
employment sectors such as the public sector, financial and business services and insurance. As
such the CMC market was assessed separately to the local office stock in the rest of the borough.
The remaining local office market predominantly caters for the needs of SMEs with a different
geographical requirements and rental profile. Croydon’s B2 (Industrial) and B8 (Industrial
Warehousing) markets also operate at a local level (defined as the Local Property Market Area or
LPMA), and for this reason the market assessment for local office occupiers was undertaken
analysis alongside an assessment of the B2 (Industrial) and B8 (Industrial Warehousing) markets.
In relation to the local office, industries and warehousing market, Stiles Harold Williams concluded:
• There has been a considerable amount of development of warehouse and factory
accommodation in Croydon over the last decade replacing older stock from the post war
era, which was unsuitable for today’s modern occupier.
• Over the past decade the market has changed from an engineering/ manufacturing basis
to one of storage and distribution - a trend that is expected to continue. Accessibility is a
key driver of this trend - Croydon being ideally situated equidistant between the M25/M23
and central London
• However, there has been continued pressure on employment clusters from residential
development. As a result some industrial/warehousing space has been lost. Now there is
little land available along the main arterial roads such as the A23 Purley Way for future
development.
• In the District Centres a number of clusters provide premises for SMEs, offering smaller
premises at lower rental levels and often with more flexible leasing arrangements. Here too
there has been pressure from alternative use classes which in some instances has
removed older style industrial premises from the market place. The loss of premises
impacts upon the capability of centres to support local entrepreneurship and provide local
employment opportunities.
In relation to the CMC market, conclusions drawn were:
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XIII
49353249
• The CMC holds the largest area of office floorspace in the south London area, outside of
SE1. It benefits from excellent public transport links and provides a wide selection of office
accommodation of varying sizes.
• Generally the CMC has aged stock, there has been very little recent development and
suffers from a physical public realm which needs improving, which adds to negative
preconceptions of place
• The town has seen prime rents to fall due to the economic downturn, which began in
quarter two of 2008. This trend is expected to continue as similar quality second hand and
refurbished space enters the market.
• In order to draw occupiers from competing centres, the CMC Office market will need to
improve the quality of the built environment. This is likely to entail significant speculative
development in the hope of achieving higher rents (around £300 / sqm)
• The CMC offers a cost-effective location for occupiers and has the capacity to deliver new
developments with rents that could be significantly lower than comparable buildings in
central London
• The combination of excellent public transport infrastructure with significant development
potential with the benefit of planning permission for office and mixed use development is
considered to be a strong draw for occupiers and developers.
• While refurbishments can be successful, the likelihood of success is highly site specific,
and it is the stimulation of new build office development in the CMC is considered vital to
the ability of the borough to capture a greater proportion of future employment growth and
fulfil its economic potential.
See Section 7 sets for a full review of Croydon’s property markets.
Demand Forecast for Employment Floorspace and Land
Our approach is to use employment projections based on macro-economic forecasts. This
approach takes account of wider drivers of change and growth, particularly with regard to the
economy of London. The Greater London Authority (GLA) model presents macro-economic
forecasts for based on a ‘triangulation’ process, which incorporates:
• Structural trends evident in the boroughs
• Assumed transport accessibility improvements, and
• The availability of current, and the development of new, business sites and related
premises.
To enhance the model, we
• Consider the property market areas with respect to different employment land use classes
and locations
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XIV
49353249
• Identify, analyse and apply the effects of local / sub-regional factors which are not reflected
in the demand forecasts; and
• Analyse the comparative strengths and opportunities of LB Croydon, and consider how the
borough might capture a greater share of employment growth.
By this method we ensure that the GLA macro-economic forecasts appropriately incorporate local
factors. Table 1 presents a synopsis of local factors which impact on the forecast.
Table 1: Factors Impacting on Demand Forecasts in LB Croydon
SLFPMA Local PMA
CMC Office (B1a) Local Office (B1a) B2 Factories B8 Warehouses
Local Factors
Investment in transport ���� ���� ���� ����
Realisation of masterplans ������������ � � �
Rebranding / marketing �������� ���� ���� ����
An enterprising borough ���� ���� ���� ����
Public administration ���� � � �
Comparative Advantages
Economic activity ����
Workforce �
Transport / Accessibility ������������
Sites and premises ��������
Source: URS
In summary, it is judged that LB Croydon has a number of positive local factors which are planned
or could come forward, and inherent comparative advantages over the competing centres of the
SLFPMA and the LPMA. In combination these factors and advantages could enable higher rates of
growth of office and industrial employment in the borough over the planning period than those
identified in the 2010 GLA forecasts.
We apply three development rates (low, medium and high, to represent three scenarios of growth)
to each of the employment forecasts for CMC Office, Local Market Office and Local Market
Industrial.
Table 2: Growth Scenarios, 2011 to 2031
Low scenario Medium scenario High scenario
Office, CMC +5% +10% +15%
Office, Local 0% +.2.5% +5%
Industry -15% -10% -5%
Source: URS
* = B1a
** = B1b/c, B2/B8
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XV
49353249
The net growth in demand for CMC Office, Local Market Office and Local Market Industrial
floorspace over the planning period, 2011 to 2031 is set out in Table 3.
Table 3: LB Croydon Employment Gross Floorspace Forecast in 2031
Future Floorspace (2031)
Current Floorspace* Low Scenario Medium Scenario High Scenario
Office CMC* 619,000 649,950 680,900 711,850
Office Local* 130,000 130,000 133,250 136,500
Industry ** 943,000 801,550 848,700 895,850
Total 1,692,000 1,581,500 1,662,850 1,744,200
Source: *VOA 2008 & URS, 2010
Note: B1a Office data by VOA data by middle layer Super Output Area
* = B1a
** = B1b/c, B2/B8
The indicative additional floorspace demand in square metres for CMC Office, Local Market Office
and Local Market Industrial floorspace for the short to medium term period (2011-2021) and the
long term period (2021-2031)
Table 4: LB Croydon Forecast of Additional Floorspace Demand (sqm)
Years 2011-21 Years 2021-31 Years 2011-31
Low Medium High Low Medium High Low Medium High
Office, CMC* 14,492 28,985 43,477 16,458 32,915 49,373 30,950 61,900 92,850
Office, Local* 0 1,776 3,552 0 1,474 2,948 0 3,250 6,500
Industry ** -94,041 -62,694 -31,347 -47,409 -31,606 -15,803 -141,450 -94,300 -47,150
Source: *VOA 2008 & URS, 2010
* = B1a
** = B1b/c, B2/B8
The 2004 CLG ELR guidance, states that where possible employment floorspace should be
converted to employment land using plot ratios.1 However, given that the office development in the
CMC can vary considerably (from 3 to 20 plus storeys) it is not considered suitable to convert the
additional demand of office floorspace into land.
However, development density (plot ratio and storey height) tends to be static for industrial and
warehousing premises and as such floorspace forecasts can be converted to land demand.
There are a number of other factors to take into account however, such as the changing demand
for waste and recycling land and the need to retain an appropriate level of vacant or derelict land
1 Page 47 of the Guidance
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XVI
49353249
for developers to build new industrial buildings (termed frictional vacancy and normally accepted as
being between 5% of total stock). Industry and warehousing demand is set out in Table 5.
Table 5: LB Croydon Employment Floorspace Demand, 2011 to 2031
Additional elements of demand for B2/B8 land use Low Medium High
1. Gross supply of B2/B8 Land in LB Croydon in 2010:
B2/B8 = 180.7 ha, which includes existing land for waste mgmt & recycling,
transport functions & utilities; and vacant land *
180.7
2. Net frictional land vacancy requirement to 2031 (Ha):
5% of 180.7ha ** +9.04
3. Additional demand for waste and recycling land:
Figure from the London Waste Apportionment Study +8.0
4. Projected demand in floorspace
Additional demand for industrial and warehousing land (Ha) – section 9 of
this report
-28.3 -18.8 -9.5
5. Gross demand for B2/B8 land 2011 – 2031 (Ha) 169.4 178.9 188.2
6. Net Demand for B2/B8 Employment Land 2011-2031 (Ha) -11.3 -1.8 7.5
Source: URS, 2010
* = LDA London Industrial Land Baseline (2010) p81
** = GLA London Industrial Land Release Benchmarks (2007), p66
Redevelopment Potential
The forecast indicated positive growth in office (B1a) and, under certain scenario’s, growth in local
employment land. Given the supply constrained environment, in section 10 we present a short list
of clusters in the CMC and outside the CMC which are best placed to accommodate this additional
demand through redevelopment. The term ‘redevelopment’ is used to describe new build activity;
development that could take place on a vacant / derelict site or in the place of a currently occupied
building; or intensification (e.g. extra storeys added / increase of plot ratio).
The selection of these clusters was based upon site qualities, characteristics and marketability
drawn from the site surveys and market assessment. CMC clusters are given priority tiers 1, 2 and
3 according to how well placed they were judged to accommodate redevelopment. Priority tier 1
clusters include key sites close to the East Croydon station - the proposed masterplan clusters of
CMC 2b East Croydon Masterplan Area (West) and CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of
College Road), as well as key sites in central locations - CMC 10b George Street and Landsdowne
Rd (George Street) and CMC 10a George Street and Lansdowne Rd (Dingwall Road). Table 10.1
provides details.
For CMC clusters, we consider the potential net gain of those sites given a priority tier 1 and 2. In
total the potential net gain of office floorspace for priority 1 and 2 clusters is significantly higher than
the high growth demand forecast in the CMC over the planning period, of 92,850 sqm. See Table
10.4.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XVII
49353249
Given the low demand forecast for office floorspace outside the CMC (up to 6,500 sqm, high
scenario) and the relatively static demand for industry and warehousing land (-1.8 ha, mid-
scenario) over the planning period, the non CMC clusters were not given priority tiers. The centres
of Purley, Coulsdon and Upper Norwood were considered to have characteristics best suited for
local office provision (as well as Cane Hill); and clusters Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area),
Selsdon Road (North and Central), Vulcan Way and Warren Road were considered best placed to
accommodate redevelopment for industry and warehousing. See Tables 10.2 and 10.3.
Conclusions
Office (B1a) Land Use
Our forecasting exercise estimated that there is additional demand up to 2031 for between 30,950
sqm and 99,350 sqm of office floorspace in LB Croydon. The majority of this demand is for office
space in the CMC. This demand is due in large part to the expected realisation of masterplans,
providing B1 floorspace, and the positive impacts of rebranding and re-positioning Croydon as
envisaged in its Economic Development Strategy and Vision.
Our property market analysis indicates that the CMC office market typically caters for headquarter
companies and large companies seeking a key location within the wider SLFPMA. These occupiers
are generally prepared to pay higher rents and with a wider market, and potentially supplier and
workforce catchment area.
Initiatives such as the extension of the East London Line, the proposed masterplans and
rebranding of the CMC will have a positive economic effect on the demand for office stock and the
council should therefore plan spatially to accommodate this demand in appropriate locations.
In addition to the presence of larger occupiers in the CMC area there is localised B1a floorspace
demand from SMEs. The local office market in Croydon contains a range of small premises
accommodated mainly within town/district centres, such as Purley, Coulsdon, Norbury and Upper
Norwood. There has been a fall in supply in some centres recently, particularly Norbury, owing to
development pressure from higher value land uses.
Premises in the local market are generally considered to be adequate to meet the need of SMEs,
however there is some demand for newer, better quality, premises. Some of the ‘local’ demand for
office space would likely be met by available floorspace within the CMC, due to its strong borough-
wide accessibility, comparatively low rental prices, and wider range of amenities.
Industrial (B1b/c, B2 and B8) Land Use
There is a total of 180.7 ha of land currently in industrial use in LB Croydon, with total industrial
floorspace estimated to be in the region of 836,000 sqm. Our forecast shows that there is projected
to be a slight decline in demand for industrial land in the period 2011 to 2031 for the lower and
medium scenarios. Factors such as the expected increase in demand for waste and recycling land,
the need to retain an appropriate level of ‘frictional’ vacant land and the Industrial Capacity SPG’s
categorisation of Croydon as a borough for restricted transfer, need to be taken into consideration.
On the supply-side, our qualitative appraisal of employment clusters, and property market analysis,
indicate that, as a whole, the current supply of industrial premises is considered to be appropriate
for the needs of occupiers in the borough and will continue to attract interest from new occupiers,
owing to such characteristics as good strategic road access and proximity to markets.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XVIII
49353249
Some employment areas, and pockets of unallocated industrial land, however have issues such as
poor servicing arrangements, poor quality of premises and environment or are accessed via
residential areas, and thus do not perform as well as they might within the strategic context.
Given the need to retain industrial land to cater for the factors mentioned above, and the generally
strong performance of UDP employment areas, it is considered inappropriate to recommend the
release of allocated employment land in the borough over the LDF plan period.
There are however areas of UDP designated industrial employment land which could benefit from
intensification, in order to provide a supply of new, modern premises (particularly to accommodate
SMEs), improve the quality of public realm and lessen impacts on neighbouring sensitive uses.
Employment clusters in New Addington and Fieldway are close to areas of deprivation and provide
redevelopment and intensification which could stimulate local regeneration.
The qualitative survey identified that a number of clusters have been developed in recent years for
non-B class land uses If this trend is allowed to continue unchecked, then employment areas may
become further eroded, as developers may seek to take advantage of precedents set by
neighbouring site owners.
It is also anticipated that industrial employment floorspace outside of designated employment areas
(EM5 sites) will, based on the status quo, continue to be lost to higher-value non-industrial uses
owing to pressure from competing uses/high land values, which are expected to persist in the long-
term.
Proposed Policy Direction
The recommendations are presented around the following themes:
1. CMC Office Uses (B1a): Promotion of new, higher density office floorspace (as part of
mixed use developments) in central locations of the CMC which are highly marketable
and developable. These sites, some of which are located within the proposal
boundaries of masterplans, offer the potential to deliver B1a office floorspace as part of
mixed use developments and reinvigorate Croydon’s urban realm. Their locations
within the CMC, among other things, offer opportunities for business to access an
efficient transport network, access a wide travel to work catchment area with a diverse
and skilled labour market and market, and lower rental values than central London.
2. Local Office (B1a): Encouragement of B1a office floorspace within district, town and
local centres.
3. Industrial Uses (B1b/c, B2 and B8): Protection of industry and warehousing uses
across the borough for B1b/c, B2 and B8 use to limit the loss of land and floorspace
within these clusters to non-employment land use, including the sui-generis use class.
4. Monitoring of Employment Land: Monitoring of take up and loss of employment land
across the borough, with specific attention to non-B class employment use classes.
The recommendations come in the format of a recommendation and then supporting justification
and rationale. Only the recommendations are presented on the next page.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XIX
49353249
CMC Office Uses (B1a)
R1 Promote B1a office development in the CMC, first within tier 1 priority clusters:
Tier 1 priority clusters
• CMC 2b - East Croydon Masterplan Area (West)
• CMC 4a - College Green Masterplan (North of College Road)
• CMC 10a- George Street and Lansdowne Rd (Dingwall Road)
• CMC 10b- George Street and Landsdowne Rd (George Street)
Tier 2 priority sites, having characteristics highly suitable to office development, should also
be the focus of promotion by the Council, though are considered to be of a lesser
importance than tier 1 priority clusters:
Tier 2 priority clusters
• CMC 2a- East Croydon Masterplan Area (East)
• CMC 13 - Cross Road
• CMC 3b - Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park Street)
• CMC 3a - Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street)
Local B1a Office
R2 The Council should seek to encourage the retention of office (B1a) floorspace in District
Centres (as defined by the London Plan).
R3 The Council should seek to encourage office (B1a) and light industry use (B1b/c and B2)
floorspace in Upper Norwood, which support creative (and cultural) industries.
Industrial Uses (B1b/c, B2 and B8)
R4 Protection of all clusters designated as Strategic Employment Areas and Employment
Areas, as per the adopted UDP, and the ‘Strategic Industrial Location’ (SIL) designation, as per the
London Plan
R5 As per policy EM5 of the existing UDP, allow unallocated sites to remain protected by
ensuring that release to non-industrial uses only occurs where;
• ‘The existing use materially harms residential amenity; and
• It has been demonstrated that there is no demand for an appropriate alternative
employment use; and
• The proposal is for housing or a community use; and
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page XX
49353249
• The proposed use would not prejudice the continued use of adjacent employment sites.’
R6 Feasibility study to assess the potential for Cane Hill to accommodate a zero-carbon
technology park, with start up and grow on space for B1a/b/c land uses, as part of a wider mixed-
use masterplan.
R7 Promote the provision of start-up and grow-on units for light-industry/storage and
distribution use classes, within the following UDP designated employment areas:
• C2B - Purley Way North (Progress Way/ Commerce Way)
• C2C - Purley Way North (North of Tramlink Bridge)
• C2D - Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area)
• C4 - Union Road
• C8A - Marlpit Lane - West of A23
R8 Promote improved estate management at the following Strategic Employment Areas /
Employment Areas, with the intention of encouraging redevelopment and intensification of land
use, and improving environmental quality:
• C2D - Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area)
• C6A - Selsdon Road (North)
• C6B - Selsdon Road (Central)
• C7 - Vulcan Way
Also promote improved land management at non-UDP designated C11 - Land at Warren Road
(Aggregates Site), to improve environmental quality and interface with neighbouring uses.
Monitoring of Employment Land
R9 Monitoring development and occupancy in all Strategic Employment Areas and
Employment Areas
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 21
49353249
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Context and Purpose
URS, in association with Stiles Harold Williams were commissioned by the London Borough of
Croydon (LB Croydon) to undertake an employment land review to assess the quantity, quality
and viability of employment land throughout the Borough and evaluate the viability of existing
Unitary Development Plan (UDP) employment policies as well as inform the Council’s
emerging LDF evidence base and associated policies. The Review provides appropriate policy
responses that ensure that the need for employment land up to 2031 is addressed and takes
account of the socio-economic characteristics of the borough.
The need for such studies has been emphasised in the DCLG’s (Department for Community
and Local Government’s) Planning Policy Guidance Note (PPG) 3 Housing of January 2005,
and most recently in the June 2010 PPS3 publication. PPG3 suggests that local planning
authorities should review all their non-housing allocations when reviewing their development
plan and consider whether some of this land might be better used for housing or mixed-use
development. Of particular importance to employment land policy and reviews such as this is
paragraph 42(a) which states:
‘Local planning authorities should consider favourably planning applications for housing or
mixed use developments which concern land allocated for industrial or commercial use in
saved policies and development plan documents or redundant land or buildings in
industrial or commercial use, but which is no longer needed for such use, unless any of
the following apply:
• it can be demonstrated, preferably through an up-to-date review of employment
land …, that there is a realistic prospect of the allocation being taken up for its
stated use in the plan period…’
The methodology applied in this study is in line with the DCLG’s Guidance Notes on
Employment Land Reviews (2004). This guidance suggests the scope of Employment Land
Reviews should focus on the B use class orders, that is B1 (Business), B2 (General Industrial)
and B8 (Storage or Distribution). The Guidance also suggests that studies should take
account of wider employment uses such as utilities, land for transport and waste management.
As noted, the study will form part of the Council’s evidence base for the emerging Local
Development Framework (LDF) policies as required by Planning Policy Statement 12
(PPS12). Furthermore, PPS4 identifies how local authorities should manage land supplies to
cater for different business needs while remaining flexible to changing economic and business
requirements.
In September 2010 LB Croydon will be consulting on further options of the Core Strategy
including developing the Industrial and Enterprise Locations strategy. This report informs
consultation on the Industrial and Enterprise Locations sections of the emerging Core
Strategy.
1.2 Study Area
The study area included the whole of LB Croydon. There are several main employment areas
in the Borough. In the centre-west of the Borough, lies the Croydon Metropolitan Centre
(hereafter referred to as the ‘CMC’) – a Strategic Office Location recognised in the London
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 22
49353249
Plan – which contains a large quantum of B1a office floorspace, with a notable presence of
public sector administration and financial and business services occupiers. The borough’s
main location of office floorspace is held in the CMC. Clusters within the CMC are located
either side of Wellesley Road, which cuts through the centre north-south, around East and
West Croydon mainline stations and the Old Town. Elsewhere, outside the CMC, office
floorspace is contained within the Borough’s District, Town and Local Centres, notably Purley
and Norbury.
Outside the CMC, Purley Way and Marlpit Lane, in the west and south of the Borough, are
traditional industrial areas allocated in the London Plan as Strategic Industrial Locations
(SILs)2. These contain general industrial, light industrial and warehousing uses (use classes
B1b/c, B2 and B8). There are also several important local industrial employment areas
dispersed through the Borough such as Gloucester Road, Union Road and Thornton Road to
the north of the borough; Selsdon Road to the south; and the district centre of New Addington
in the south east. In addition there are some small pockets of unallocated industrial land
located throughout Croydon, mostly consisting of single premises or small industrial clusters.
The full list of clusters surveyed is presented in Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2.
1.3 Report Structure
This report sets out our final findings and policy recommendations for employment land in LB
Croydon, taking into account the future economic development of the area. The report is
structured as follows:
• Section 2: Details of our approach to the review.
• Section 3: A review of national, regional and local policy context of particular
relevance to employment land, the economy, regeneration and related issues in LB
Croydon.
• Section 4: A comprehensive analysis of socio-economic baseline conditions, and
information on key sectors, in LB Croydon relative to the rest of London and Great
Britain.
• Section 5: Key findings of the local office and industrial employment area surveys and
desk research.
• Section 6: Key findings of the CMC office employment area surveys and desk
research.
• Section 7: Analysis of the employment land market defining the regional and local
property markets and any trends in the commercial and industrial property sectors,
based on consultations with local property agents.
• Section 8: Consultations with stakeholders
• Section 9: Forecasts of employment demand and floorspace over the short to medium
term and longer term.
• Section 10: An assessment of the priority clusters which could accommodate the
demand for employment land over the planning period.
2 A sub-category of Preferred Industrial Location (PIL)
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 23
49353249
• Section 11 presents conclusions and recommendations on the employment land
strategy that the Council should adopt over the LDF timeframe including suggestions
on retention and release of employment land and sites. These recommendations
include an assessment of the viability of existing UDP policies, together with new
recommendations.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 25
49353249
2 APPROACH
2.1 Introduction
This section sets out the main research elements of the employment land review as illustrated
in Figure 2.1. Each element is reviewed briefly in the following sub-sections.
Figure 2.1: Approach to the Employment Land Review
Supply
Employment and business profiling
Employment land surveys
Consultation (stakeholders)
Policy And Socio-Economic Context
Planning Policy
Economic Development
Socio-Economic Analysis
Gap Analysis/ Conclusions
The difference between supply
and demand
Demand
Employment land market
analysis
Employment land forecast
Consultation (stakeholders)
Strategy
Policy Recommendations
Strategy
Supply
Employment and business profiling
Employment land surveys
Consultation (stakeholders)
Policy And Socio-Economic Context
Planning Policy
Economic Development
Socio-Economic Analysis
Gap Analysis/ Conclusions
The difference between supply
and demand
Demand
Employment land market
analysis
Employment land forecast
Consultation (stakeholders)
Strategy
Policy Recommendations
Strategy
Source: URS
2.2 Policy Context and Socio-economic Profile
In order to fully understand the drivers of demand and supply of office and industrial sites and
premises across LB Croydon and potential constraints and opportunities, it is necessary to
investigate the policy framework and socio-economic context.
The policy review took account of current national, regional and local policies and strategies.
The review provided an initial identification of employment land clusters across the borough,
which provided the basis for discussion with the Council on which sites to survey.
The socio-economic characteristics of the borough were profiled using a number of
information sources from ONS – datasets from the Census, Annual Business Inquiry, New
Earnings Survey and VAT registration. For comparison, LB Croydon data was benchmarked
against Greater London and the UK. The profiling help to identify key issues regarding
business competitiveness, industrial structure, labour market structure and deprivation.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 26
49353249
2.3 Survey of Employment Sites and Premises
To assess the strategic and site-specific qualities of the borough’s employment areas, URS
undertook site surveys. The list of employment areas for survey was drawn up from the
following information sources:
• The UDP (July 2006)
• Emerging AAP/ LDF documentation
• Emerging OAPF database, listing sites with the potential for office use
• Planning and pre-planning application information
• Masterplans; and
• Through discussions with the Council and during survey.
From these sources, three types of employment land were identified:
1. Industrial and warehousing land
2. Office sites located in district, town and local centres; and
3. Office employment areas located in the CMC.
Employment land was divided into distinctive employment clusters (collections of sites) and
agreed with the Council prior to surveying. Prior to survey the employment clusters were
defined spatially using GIS layers from the adopted UDP proposals map (July 2006), URS
London Industrial Land Baseline mapping (2010 on behalf of the LDA/GLA), aerial
photography and the client and consultancy team’s knowledge of the area. In some instances
site surveys found that there were two or more distinct sub-clusters operating within the larger
cluster. As such these sub-clusters were assessed and their boundaries identified and labelled
(a, b, c, d etc) for each division. Table 2.1 and Figure 2.1 set out the location and content of
employment clusters outside the CMC, and Table 2.2 and Figure 2.2 set out the location and
content of employment clusters within the CMC.
Each cluster was visited and appraised against an agreed set of economic, planning and
property market criteria to assess their fitness for purpose. The criteria used to assess sites
were in line with DCLG Employment Land Review Guidance Notes and the GLA Industrial
Land Capacity SPG (Industrial Land Capacity SPG, GLA, 2005) as well as PPS4 guidance.
To ensure consistency surveyors used a structured questionnaire, manual and a map of each
employment area. The questionnaire included a series of tick-box style and open-ended
questions to capture qualitative and quantitative information. Once the physical inspections
were complete (during April 2010) the survey data was entered into a database for analysis.
Appendix A holds the Employment Cluster questionnaire and Appendix B holds the CMC
cluster questionnaire.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 27
49353249
Table 2.1: Employment Clusters Surveyed Outside the CMC
URS
Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Name of Cluster LB Croydon Adopted UDP
(2006) Designation / Site
Proposals
Total
Employment
Cluster Area
(ha)
C1 Thornton Road Employment Area 4.7
C2a Purley Way North (East of Purley Way) Strategic Employment Area 28.7
C2b Purley Way North (Progress Way/ Commerce Way) Strategic Employment Area 24.4
C2c Purley Way North (North of Tramlink Bridge) Strategic Employment Area 8.3
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area) Strategic Employment Area 2.8
C3a Purley Way South (Imperial Way/Lysander Road) Strategic Employment Area 22.8
C3b Purley Way South (Queensway/Kingsway/Princes Way) Strategic Employment Area 10.4
C3c Purley Way South (Jn of Stafford Road/Purley Way) Strategic Employment Area 0.7
C4 Union Road Employment Area 3.3
C5a Gloucester Road (West of) Employment Area 5.3
C5b Gloucester Road (East of) Employment Area 3.2
C6a Selsdon Road (North) Employment Area 2.6
C6b Selsdon Road (Central) Employment Area 2.1
C6c Selsdon Road (South) Employment Area 2.1
C7 Vulcan Way Employment Area 9.2
C8a Marlpit Lane (West of A23) Strategic Employment Area 5.8
C8b Marlpit Lane (East of A23) Strategic Employment Area 14.2
C9 Bensham Grove * 2.1
C10 Hastings Road (Harris & Bailey Site) * 2.0
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) * 2.5
C12 Cane Hill Major Developed Site in the
Green Belt 4.0 **
C13 Upper Norwood District Centre 8.4
C14 Norbury Town Centre 10.2
C15 Thornton Heath Town Centre 9.7
C16 South Norwood District Centre 13.9
C17 Selsdon District Centre 4.8
C18 New Addington District Centre 6.5
C19 Purley Town Centre 19.4
C20 Coulsdon Town Centre 10.1
C21 Addiscombe Local Centre 4.4
Total 428.5
Source: URS site survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters. * = Non-designated sites i.e. not protected within the Strategic Employment Area or Employment Areas ** = The total land area is 88.0ha, however we are advised by the Council that the area available for development is 4.0ha
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 28
49353249
Figure 2.1: Employment Clusters Surveyed Outside the CMC
Source: URS
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 29
49353249
Table 2.2: Surveyed CMC Clusters
URS Cluster
no.
Name Policy Designation Area
(hectares)
CMC 1a West Croydon Masterplan (East side) Strategic Office Location 1.9
CMC 1b West Croydon Masterplan (West side) Strategic Office Location 4.6
CMC 2a East Croydon Masterplan (East of station tracks) Strategic Office Location 3.0
CMC 2b East Croydon Masterplan (Station and West of station tracks) Strategic Office Location 6.8
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street) Strategic Office Location 1.4
CMC 3b Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park Street) Strategic Office Location 2.9
CMC 3c Mid Croydon Masterplan (South of Katherine Street) Strategic Office Location 3.7
CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of College Road) Strategic Office Location 0.8
CMC 4b College Green Masterplan (South of College Road) Strategic Office Location 5.1
CMC 5 Old Town: Cairo New Road Strategic Office Location 0.9
CMC 6 Mason’s Avenue and Croydon Flyover Strategic Office Location 1.7
CMC 7 North of Bedford Park Strategic Office Location 0.9
CMC 8 Land between Sydenham Road and Bedford Park Strategic Office Location 1.4
CMC 9 Land between Landsdowne Road and Sydenham Road Strategic Office Location 1.1
CMC 10a George Street and Landsdowne Rd (Dingwall Road) Strategic Office Location 0.8
CMC 10b George Street and Landsdowne Rd (George Street) Strategic Office Location 0.7
CMC 10c George Street and Landsdowne Rd (Wellesley Road) Strategic Office Location 2.3
CMC 11a Whitgift Centre (Wellesley Road side) Strategic Office Location 2.1
CMC 11b Whitgift Centre (North End) Strategic Office Location 3.3
CMC 12a North End and Lennard Rd End (East of London Road) None 1.1
CMC 12b Parson’s Mead and North (West of London Road) None 1.3
CMC 13 Cross Road Strategic Office Location 0.6
CMC 14 Car Park to north of Lansdowne Rd Strategic Office Location 0.9
CMC 15 Church Rd / Croydon Flyover Strategic Office Location 0.3
CMC 16 South of Old Town (a, b, c and d) Strategic Office Location 0.5
Total 49.9
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, May 2010, Calculations may not always sum due
to rounding
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 30
49353249
Figure 2.2: CMC Clusters Surveyed
Source: URS
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 31
49353249
2.4 Market Analysis
Property market specialists Stiles Harold Williams assessed the LB Croydon’s office, industrial
and warehousing property markets. The assessment involved an analysis of supply and
demand characteristics such as stock, take up rates, availability, rental levels and the
development pipeline. The review defined the property markets of each land use. Property
markets can be considered as a single geographical area over which a company or
organisation may consider as viable alternative location for their operation. As such the
property market area is the catchment area of other competing centres, which are likely to
offer similar supply characteristics.
The review took account of the wider market of the South London Fringe Property Market Area
(SLFPMA) and the local Property Market Area (LPMA). The logic and reasoning for two
property market areas is set out in Section 7. Stiles Harold Williams also provided an analysis
of the marketability of specific employment sites which informed the gap analysis and the
consideration of sites for redevelopment as set out in Section 10.
2.5 Consultation
A key exercise of the research programme was to consult with relevant local business groups,
business support organisations, and economic and regeneration organisations active in LB
Croydon. The exercise supplemented desk-based research and surveys findings, and sought
to test the emerging findings and conclusions relating to the demand and provision of office
and industrial sites and premises. Consultation took the form of a semi-structured interview by
telephone around topics including: LB Croydon as a place to do business; business needs; the
demand and supply of sites and premises, their characteristics and their suitability;
opportunities and constraints to growth; inward investment and regeneration; labour force
structure, education and skills and economic inclusion.
Appendix C holds a full list of discussion topics.
2.6 Employment Land Forecast
The employment land demand forecast were driven by GLA employment forecasts3 by
borough and shaped by information from the property market assessment, analysis of local
factors such as future regeneration initiatives likely to influence employment land demand, and
the consultation exercise.
2.7 Gap Analysis
The proceeding tasks developed a picture of the current stock and forecast of additional
demand for employment land over the planning period. An analysis of the gap between supply
and demand was then undertaken to estimate the required employment floorspace over the
short–medium term (to 2021) and longer term (2021 to 2031) in relation to supply, and
illustrate the short fall in provision.
2.8 Consideration of Sites for Redevelopment
The gap analysis illustrated a shortfall in the provision of employment land – in particular office
floorspace in the CMC, over the planning period. To meet this shortfall, sites and buildings
3 GLA Economics Borough Employment Projections to 2031
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 32
49353249
were identified that could be developed or redeveloped for employment land. The identification
of sites and buildings focused on vacant sites, empty/underused buildings and land, and poor
quality /older stock. The potential achievable plot ratio and building height and mix of use
classes by site were deduced via site surveys and provided to the Council’s Planning and
Urban Design Team for comment. Stiles Harold Williams informed the marketability and
development constraints of sites and premises.
2.9 Conclusions and Recommendations
The conclusion draws together the research evidence and summarises the employment land
current position and outlook for the borough. The recommendations are based on robust
evidence amassed through the research programme. Recommendations are made for office
and industrial/warehousing use classes at a generic and site specific level, as appropriate.
Recommendations take account of local, regional and national planning framework, strategies
and initiatives, and designed to be realistic, actionable and attainable. The recommendations
seek to promote regeneration and economic opportunities for residents and businesses in LB
Croydon, with the overarching aim of enhancing the borough’s economy.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 33
49353249
3 POLICIES AND LITERATURE REVIEW
3.1 Introduction
This section provides an overview of the policies and strategies relevant to employment and
employment land in LB Croydon. The review frames the context to the research in terms of
national, regional and local policy, the relationship between which is presented in the hierarchy
in Figure 3.1 below.
Figure 3.1: Policy and Literature Hierarchy
Source: URS
3.2 National Policy
Planning Policy Statements (PPSs) provide a national guidance framework setting out a range
of planning principles and objectives on specific topics.
PPS1: Delivering Sustainable Communities
PPS1 emphasises the important role that the planning system has in the delivery of
sustainable development. It encourages local authorities to recognise wider sub-regional,
regional and national benefits of economic development and consider these alongside any
adverse local impacts.
Local Policy and Literature
• Unitary Development Plan
• LDF Core Strategy DPD
• Vision and Economic Development Strategy
• Area Action Plans and Supplementary Planning Guidance
• Evidence Base Documents
Regional Policy
• Strategic Development Plan
• Supplementary Planning Guidance
• Economic Development Strategy
• Other Relevant Studies
National Policy
Planning Policy Statements
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 34
49353249
Reference is given to the UK’s strategy on sustainable development, which emphasises the
role of planning to provide attractive places to live and work and development patterns that
minimise the need to travel.
PPS3: Housing
PPS3 was released in November 2006 to replace the previous PPG3, and was further
updated in June 2010. The Government’s key housing policy goal is to ensure that everyone
has the opportunity to live in a decent home, which they can afford, in a community where they
want to live. The statement has four key objectives that include:
• To achieve a wide choice of high quality homes, both affordable and market
housing, to address the requirements of the community
• To widen opportunities for home ownership and ensure high quality housing for
those who cannot afford market housing, in particular those who are vulnerable or in
need
• To improve affordability across the housing market, including by increasing the
supply of housing, and
• To create sustainable, inclusive, mixed communities in all areas, both urban and
rural.
The Statement identifies that to ensure effective use of land Local Planning Authorities (LPAs)
should consider a range of incentives or interventions that could help to ensure that previously
developed land is developed in line with market trajectories. This should include:
• Planning to address obstacles to the development of vacant and derelict sites and
buildings, for example, use of compulsory purchase powers where that would help
resolve land ownership or assembly issues
• Considering whether sites that are currently allocated for industrial or commercial
use could be more appropriately re-allocated for housing development
• Encouraging innovative housing schemes that make effective use of public sector
previously developed land.
PPS4: Planning for Sustainable Economic Development
PPS4 ‘Planning for Sustainable Economic Development’ sets out the Government’s
overarching objective of achieving sustainable economic growth. The statement emphasises
that planning must help build prosperous communities by improving the economic
performance of areas, reduce the gaps between the growth rates between regions, promote
regeneration, deliver more sustainable patterns of economic development and promote the
vitality and viability of towns and other centres. PPS4 defines economic development as
including B Use Classes, public and community uses, main town centre uses and other
potential uses where they provide employment opportunities and/or generate wealth and/or
produces or generate an economic output or product.
PPS4 prescribes that local authorities should take a proactive approach n planning for the
promotion of competitive town centre environments and consumer choice. This should be
done by:
• ‘supporting a diverse range of uses which appeal to a wide range of age and a.
social groups, ensuring that these are distributed throughout the centre
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 35
49353249
• planning for a strong retail mix so that the range and quality of the comparison b.
and convenience retail offer meets the requirements of the local catchment area,
recognising that smaller shops can significantly enhance the character and vibrancy
of a centre
• supporting shops, services and other important small scale economic uses c.
(including post offices, petrol stations, village halls and public houses) in local
centres and villages.
• identifying sites in the centre, or failing that on the edge of the centre, capable d. of
accommodating larger format developments where a need for such development
has been identified
• retaining and enhancing existing markets and, where appropriate, e. re-introducing
or creating new ones, ensuring that markets remain attractive and competitive by
investing in their improvement, and
• taking measures to conserve and, where appropriate, enhance the established f.
character and diversity of their town centres.’
It also notes that local planning authorities should identify an appropriate portfolio of sites to
accommodate identified needs, taking care to ensure that sites are capable of accommodating
a range of business models that are appropriate in terms of their scale, format, car parking
provision and their scope for disaggregation. In their approach to doing this, local authorities
should:
• ‘base their approach on the identified need for development
• identify the appropriate scale of development, ensuring that the scale of the sites
identified and the level of travel they generate, are in keeping with the role and
function of the centre within the hierarchy of centres and the catchment served
• apply the sequential approach to site selection
• assess the impact of sites on existing centres, and
• consider the degree to which other considerations such as any physical
regeneration benefits of developing on previously-developed sites, employment
opportunities, increased investment in an area or social inclusion, maybe material to
the choice of appropriate locations for development.’
PPS10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management
PPS10 requires that a broad range of sites including existing industrial estates should be
considered when deciding where to locate new waste and recycling facilities. Effort should be
made to locate waste processing facilities close to the producers of waste which are often
those operating on existing business and industrial areas.
It also suggests that local waste planners should look for opportunities to locate
complementary facilities together on appropriate sites. When identifying sites for waste
management facilities the PPS suggests that local waste planners assess sites using the
following criteria:
• ‘The extent to which they support the policies in PPS10
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 36
49353249
• The physical and environmental constraints on development, including existing and
proposed neighbouring land uses
• The cumulative effect of previous waste disposal facilities on the well-being of the
local community, including any significant adverse impacts on environmental quality,
social cohesion and inclusion or economic potential
• The capacity of existing and potential transport infrastructure to support the
sustainable movement of waste, and products arising from resource recovery,
seeking when practicable and beneficial to use modes other than road transport,
and
• Give priority to the re-use of previously-developed land, and redundant agricultural
and forestry buildings and their curtilages.’
PPG13: Transport
Planning Policy Guidance 13 (PPG13) sets out the objectives to integrate planning and sets
out the objectives to integrate planning and transport at the national, regional, strategic and
local level and to promote more sustainable transport choices both for carrying people and for
moving freight. The Guidance states that ‘Local authorities should seek to ensure that
strategies in the development plan and the local transport plan are complementary:
consideration of development plan allocations and local transport priorities and investment
should be closely linked’. This role involves maximising the use of key sites located adjacent
to transport interchanges.
With regard to office uses (B1), it is stated that local authorities should adopt a positive,
planned approach to identifying preferred areas and sites for B1 uses which are (or will be) as
far as possible highly accessible by public transport, walking, and cycling. In addition, local
planning authorities are instructed to adopt a flexible approach to the use of dwellings for
home working to protect the amenity of the area for any neighbouring residential uses. For
warehousing and distribution uses (B8), the Guidance advocates that local authorities, should
aim to locate developments generating substantial freight, particularly bulk goods, away from
residential/central areas, and ensure adequate access to major trunk roads. Opportunities for
manufacturing (B2) and warehousing and distribution uses to be served by rail or waterways
should be promoted wherever possible.
3.3 Regional Policy
London Plan (2008)
The London Plan (March 2008 - Consolidated with Alterations since 2004) is the spatial
strategy for Greater London spanning the next fifteen to twenty years. It sets out an integrated
social, economic and environmental framework for the future development of London. The
relevant policies are stated below.
An overall strategic policy of the Plan provides London Boroughs with guidance on the
development of their local plans and states that such strategies should:
• Focus retail, leisure, key commercial activity and services in suburban metropolitan,
major, district and local town centres. Where such centres do not already have good
levels of public transport accessibility and capacity, improvements should be
promoted
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 37
49353249
• Promote areas around suburban town centres that have good access by public
transport and on foot to the town centre as appropriate for higher-density and mixed-
use development including housing, and
• Improve the sustainability of suburban residential heartlands by promoting better
access to centres, employment and community facilities, improving the public realm,
making efficient use of space, and where appropriate, modernising or redeveloping
the housing stock.
Further to this, the London Plan divides London into sub-regions to facilitate the
implementation of its strategic policies. LB Croydon forms part of the South-West London Sub-
Region along with Lambeth, Merton, Richmond upon Thames, Sutton, and the Royal Borough
of Kingston upon Thames. This sub-region Policy 5D.1 in the Plan sets out a number of
strategic priorities for South-West London and those particular to LB Croydon and the region.
These priorities aim to:
• ‘Strengthen economic linkages throughout the sub-region to the CAZ, especially in
terms of the supply chain, and take maximum advantage of the Strategic
Opportunity Areas on the southern fringe of the CAZ
• Promote the sub-region’s contribution to London’s world city role, especially in
relation to the Central Activities Zone including the London South Central
Opportunity Areas and strengthen linkages between CAZ and the rest of the sub-
region
• Optimise the development of Opportunity Areas and Areas for Intensification as set
out in Policies 5E.2 and 5E.3
• Further exploit the strength of the Metropolitan town centres and encourage
sensitive restructuring of some town centres to reflect changes in the office market
and the need for a range of economic activities and housing
• Manage the reuse of surplus industrial land taking into account waste management
requirements
• Consolidate the attractiveness of South West London by addressing areas in need
of regeneration and by improving the quality of the public realm
• Manage the reuse of surplus industrial land taking into account waste management
requirements
• Plan for and secure the necessary financial resources to deliver planned transport
infrastructure for the sub-region including strategic priorities: Crossrail 1, the East
London Line extension, DLR extensions, Thameslink Programme, improved bus
services, Greenwich Waterfront, Transit scheme, new river crossings, including the
Thames Gateway bridge and the Cross River Tram
• Promote improvements in the national rail network, which is of particular importance
in South West London, and the benefits to the sub-region of Crossrail 1, Thameslink
Programme, Cross River Tram, Tramlink extensions and the East London Line
extension and improvements to the Northern, District and Victoria lines
• Improve orbital movement by public transport, including Croydon Tramlink
extensions, and improve access to Heathrow
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 38
49353249
• Ensure the sub-region is an attractive business location, and
• Support the strategic co-ordination of the development corridor from Croydon to
Gatwick and collaborate with SEERA, SEEDA and local authorities in the corridor.
Policy 5E.3 refers to Opportunity areas, such as Croydon Town Centre, in the South West
London sub-region and states that; ‘Taking account of other policies, developments will be
expected to maximise residential and non-residential densities and to contain mixed uses’.
Croydon town centre is recognised as an Opportunity Area in view of the scale of the
opportunities it offers, the strategic challenges it faces and the need for integrated action. The
policy considers the following sites in the Opportunity Area to be of strategic importance;
Fairfield Halls; Croydon College; Park Place and; the Whitgift extension.
An overall strategic policy of the Plan provides London Boroughs with guidance on the
development of their local plans and states that such strategies should:
• ‘Focus retail, leisure, key commercial activity and services in suburban metropolitan,
major, district and local town centres. Where such centres do not already have
good levels of public transport accessibility and capacity, improvements should be
promoted
• Promote areas around suburban town centres that have good access by public
transport and on foot to the town centre as appropriate for higher-density and mixed-
use development including housing, and
• Improve the sustainability of suburban residential heartlands by promoting better
access to centres, employment and community facilities, improving the public realm,
making efficient use of space, and where appropriate, modernising or redeveloping
the housing stock.’
The London Plan also defines the Strategic Industrial Location (SIL) framework as ‘intended to
reconcile the demand for, and supply of, productive industrial land in London’. The LB
Croydon contains two designated SILs: Purley Way and Marlpit Lane.
Consultation Draft Replacement London Plan (2009)
In October 2009, the Mayor of London published the ‘Consultation Draft Replacement London
Plan’. The document was open for consultation until the 5th January 2010. Formal publication
of the replacement plan is expected towards the end of 2011.
While the preparation of the Plan is ongoing, the ‘London Plan’ published in February 2008 will
be in force, and will have legal status until the replacement plan is formally published.
However, the ‘Consultation Draft Replacement London Plan’ will gather weight for
development control purposes further into the replacement process.
The overall thrust and direction, with regard to employment land, of the ‘Consultation Draft
Replacement London Plan’ is broadly similar to the current ‘London Plan’. Some degree of
greater protection is given to SILs, through more detailed guidance on their protection. Thus,
Policy 2.17, ‘Strategic Industrial Locations’ states that ‘Development proposals in SILs should
be refused unless they:
• Fall within the broad industrial type activities outlined in Paragraph 2.71
• Are part of a strategically coordinated process of SIL consolidation through an
Opportunity Area Planning Framework or borough DPD
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 39
49353249
• Propose employment workspace to meet identified needs for small and medium
sized enterprises (SMEs) or new emerging industrial sectors; or
• Proposal small scale ‘walk to’ services for industrial occupiers such as workplace
crèches or cafes.
Policy 2.17 also states that ‘Development proposals within or adjacent to SILs should not
compromise the integrity or effectiveness of these locations in accommodating industrial type
activities’.
A key evidence base document for the Replacement London Plan is the 2010 London
Industrial Baseline Study, undertaken by URS/DTZ, being used to inform its forthcoming
Examination in Public (EIP) and as material consideration for planning applications on
industrial land.
GLA Industrial Capacity Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) (2008)
Originally published by the GLA in 2003, the Industrial Capacity SPG has been updated in
March 2008 following the publication of the London Plan - Consolidated with Alterations since
2004. The SPG defines industrial employment as activities relating to manufacturing and
wholesale distribution and seeks to:
• ‘Ensure that there is an adequate stock of industrial capacity to meet the future
needs and functional requirements of different types of industrial and related uses
(including waste management, logistics, utilities and transport functions) in different
parts of London, including that for good quality and affordable space; and
• Plan, monitor and manage the release of surplus industrial land so that it can better
contribute to strategic and local planning objectives, especially those to provide
more housing (including affordable housing) and, in appropriate locations, to provide
social infrastructure and to contribute to town centre’.
The SPG categorises LB Croydon is categorised as a borough for restricted transfer, which is
defined as ‘typically having low levels of industrial land relative to demand (particularly for
waste management or land for logistics) and/or low proportions of industrial land within the SIL
framework.’
The SPG highlights the success of the Strategic Industrial Locations (SIL)4 Framework in
protecting London’s principal industrial locations. At the same time, it recognises that the SIL
frameworks run the risk of being too successful and potentially maintaining land as industrial
when there is no longer demand for this use. However, the monitoring aspect of the approach
to maintaining industrial land could keep the framework in tune with market requirements and
broader planning objectives.
In reference to SILs, Policy 2 (SPG 2) states that ‘Boroughs and other partners are asked to:
• Promote the SILs as the prime locations for industrial activity in London
• Where relevant in their strategies, DPDs and other plans, identify the components of
the SIL framework namely the Preferred Industrial Locations and Industrial Business
Parks
4 Formerly ‘Strategic Employment Locations’ within the London Plan (2004)
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 40
49353249
• Manage the differing offers of PILs and IBPs through coordinate investment,
regeneration initiatives, transport and environmental improvements and the use of
planning agreements, and provide local planning guidelines to meet the needs of
different types of industry appropriate to each having regard to paragraph 4.3, and
• Resist the development of non-industrial uses within the SIL other than as part of a
strategically coordinated process of consolidation (see Section 3) except where they
provide local, small scale, ‘walk to’ services for industrial occupiers e.g. workplace
crèches, or office space ancillary to industrial use.’
The study confirms that LB Croydon has two London Plan designated SILs – Purley Way and
Marlpit Lane – which both fall within the Preferred Industrial Location (PIL) sub-categorisation.
Policy 3 (SPG 3) addresses Locally Significant Industrial sites, which fall outside of the SIL
framework. Councils are advised to identify sites of particular local importance, which they
wish to enhance and protect for industrial uses, subject to robust strategic and local evidence
of demand and taking into account certain economic and land-use criteria. Once these sites
are identified on proposals maps they are awarded the same protection as those under the
SIL framework.
Also important to the situation in LB Croydon, Policy 4 (SPG 4) highlights the need for LPAs
‘to develop policies and criteria in DPDs to manage the release or retention of other smaller
industrial sites outside the SIL framework and not designated on Proposals Maps, Boroughs
are asked to take account of strategic and local assessments of supply and demand
(paragraphs 3.2 to 3.18) and have regard to the qualitative criteria in paragraphs 4.11 to 4.13’.
Industrial and Warehousing Land Demand in London, (2004)
The GLA and LDA commissioned this study in December 2004 with the specific purpose ‘to
assess the scale and nature and, in particular, the [geographical] distribution of future demand
for industrial and warehousing land in London and to draw policy implications’.
The study set out to accomplish two key tasks:
• To assess the balance of demand and supply for industrial and warehousing land,
testing the earlier estimate that some 50 hectares per year London-wide could be
released to other uses, and providing guidance for individual sub-regions and
Boroughs.
• To provide a description of current and future requirements for warehousing space,
and recommend strategic planning policies for meeting these requirements over the
next 15 years, translating into practical recommendations in the draft SPGs that
planning should take a positive approach to logistics and distribution.
The study highlights that the occupiers of industrial and warehousing land are drawn from a
wider spread of Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) sectors than the traditionally used
manufacturing and wholesale distribution. Many businesses use warehouses and industrial
land to conduct their activities including: transport and storage, construction, recycling and
refuse disposal. This study takes account of this change and has forecasted a slower
reduction5 in the demand for industrial/warehousing land as many of these sectors have better
prospects of employment growth than the traditional manufacturing sector.
5 Compared to the previous study Demand and Supply of Business Space in London.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 41
49353249
London Office Policy Review 2009
The purpose of the annual London Office Policy Review (LOPR) is to provide planning policy
makers with up to date information on the supply and demand for offices in London, including
the planning pipeline, and to provide analysis of the operation of the office market and its
relationship with planning policy.
The main findings of the report were that despite the ‘volte face’ experienced in the market
during late 2007 and 2008, the impacts felt are still considered to be part of cyclical patterns of
demand that characterise the market. It does however identify that actual structural changes in
the market are taking place, in particular, and of relevance to Croydon, is the emergence of
polycentricity in the Outer London (OL) area and the marginalisation of some OL centres.
Another relevant issue highlighted in the study is the rationalisation of public sector office
requirements and its potential impact on centres which rely on these occupiers, to some
extent, to bolster their commercial office supply – of relevance to Croydon. New working
patterns, characterised by a greater number of employees working from home, is also
identified as having an impact on the demand for office floorspace.
The study reports that the LB Croydon contains 749,000 sqm of office floorspace, which is the
third highest concentration of the Outer London boroughs. In reference to the CMC itself, the
study describes it as ‘a very large and well established business centre, with the largest office
stock outside the CAZ. However, since the early-1990s, its story has been somewhat one of
stagnation with, more recently, sustained efforts to bring about a distinctly overdue upgrade to
the built stock.’ It identifies the CMC as being a centre with a case for encouraging office led
development in the next cycle.
The study concurs with all the conclusions made by the Outer London Commission (OLC) in
2009, which includes the recommended designation of Croydon (and Stratford) as Strategic
Office areas.
The Mayor’s Economic Development Strategy for Greater London (2009)
On 12 October 2009, the Mayor of London published a new draft Economic Development
Strategy (EDS) for public consultation. The purpose of the Strategy is to provide relevant
stakeholders, public authorities and interested parties, with a vision for London’s future, an
analysis of the economy and policy directions for achieving its ambitions; and to clarify roles
and responsibilities with other partners who make a major contribution to developing London’s
economy.
The Economic Development Strategy (EDS) is framed around five central objectives, which
are;
• “Promote London as a city that excels as a world capital of business
• Ensure that it has the most competitive business environment in the world drive London’s
transition to a low carbon economy and maximise the opportunities this will create
• Give all Londoners the opportunity to take part in London’s economic success, access
sustainable employment and progress in their careers; and
• Maximise the benefits to London from investment to support growth and regeneration, and
from the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games and its legacy.”
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 42
49353249
3.4 Local Policy
LB Croydon Unitary Development Plan (2006)
The LB Croydon adopted their Unitary Development Plan (UDP) on 13th July 2006. Along with
the Mayor’s London Plan (2008), this forms the borough’s principal statutory Development
Plan. Under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, the LB Croydon are to replace
the existing UDP with a Local Development Framework (LDF), consisting of a number Local
Development Documents (LDDs).
Whilst acknowledging the importance of sectors such as leisure, shopping, tourism and hotels,
the UDP emphasises that the majority of Croydon’s economic activity takes place within
offices, industrial and warehousing premises. As an employment location, the Borough’s
strengths are identified as being its proximity to Central London, access to key transport
linkages i.e. motorways and international airports, and its skilled labour supply. These
characteristics enable the Borough to attract strong wealth creating activities, research and
development functions, high quality office stock, high technology manufacturing and other
modern growth sectors such as ICT infrastructure, creative and media, and
environmental/green industries.
Policy EM1, states that ‘Development for Class B1(a) offices will be permitted within Croydon
Metropolitan Centre and the Town Centres shown on the Proposals Map‘ and that these
locations are the Plan’s preferred location for these uses. Outside these areas, such
development will only be permitted where;
• ‘The need for the development has been demonstrated and the development cannot
be accommodated within the defined centres
• The site is, or is capable of being, well served by public transport and easily
accessible on foot or by bicycle; and
• The site is well connected to the defined centre and has the potential for linked trips.’
In relation to industrial (B1b/c and B2) and warehousing (B8) uses within the defined
Employment Areas, Policy EM2 states ‘planning permission will not be granted for a change
of use from uses within Classes B1(b), B1(c), B2 or B8 unless uses within these Classes
create unacceptable environmental or traffic problems or unless the proposal is for;
• A Sui Generis use, which would,
• generate employment which is quantitatively and qualitatively comparable to uses
within those Classes; and
• not harm the continuation of existing uses within those Classes; or
• a change of use from Sui Generis uses to Class B1(b), B1(c), B2 or B8 or to a sui
generis use which would,
� generate employment which is quantitatively and qualitatively comparable
to uses within those Classes; and
� not harm the continuation of existing uses within those Classes.’
Policy EM2 also states that ‘any new use within an Employment Area will not be permitted if it
would prejudice the use of adjacent employment sites for any uses with Classes B1(b), B1(c),
B2 or B8.’
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 43
49353249
The UDP aims to ensure that industrial and warehousing uses are concentrated in the most
appropriate areas to guard against causing adverse environmental impacts and compromising
residential amenity. Recognising this, Policy EM3 states that ‘Outside the Employment Areas
shown on the Proposals Map development within Use Classes B1(b), B1(c), B2 or B8 will only
be permitted if it is less than 500 square metres.’
Small-scale office (B1a) developments are considered acceptable uses in District and Local
Centres subject to conditions, with Policy EM4 stating that ‘development within Use Class
B1(a) will only be permitted in these areas if it is less than 500 square metres and provided
that the scheme does not result in any of the following:
• Any significant adverse traffic impacts; or
• Any significant adverse effect on residential amenity or on the environment; or
• No net loss of satisfactory dwellings or housing land; or
• No loss of any relevant Use Class A1 –A5 protected under policies SH4 or SH5; or
• No loss of necessary community facilities’.
The UDP recognises that industrial and warehousing uses outside the designated
Employment Areas provide residents with the opportunity to live and work locally, and
contribute significantly to the economic health of the Borough. Policy EM5 protects such sites
by ensuring that release to non-industrial uses only occurs where;
• ‘The existing use materially harms residential amenity; or
• It has been demonstrated that there is no demand for an appropriate alternative
employment use; and
• The proposal is for housing or a community use; and
• The proposed use would not prejudice the continued use of adjacent employment
sites.’
In reference to Cane Hill – a Major Developed Site in the Green Belt – Policy EM8 states that
‘Planning permission will be granted for a Science and Business Innovation Park….provided
that it conforms to the requirements of Policy RO7.’
LB Croydon Local Development Framework Core Strategy - ‘Towards a Preferred
Option’
In line with the provisions of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, the Core
Strategy Development Plan Document (DPD) for the LB of Croydon is being prepared for
inclusion in the Local Development Framework (LDF) for the Borough. This is currently at the
‘Preferred Options’ stage (‘Towards a Preferred Option’), which identifies the issues to be
included in the Core Strategy such as affordable housing and protection of industrial land.
Public consultation on the Preferred Options took place for six weeks from 8th February to 23
rd
March 2010.
Croydon Vision (2008)
This document sets out the vision for Croydon in 2040. The vision describes a city with six
core themes: enterprise, learning; creativity; connections; sustainability, and; caring.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 44
49353249
As an ‘Enterprising City’, the vision is for the borough to be a ‘hotspot of knowledge, creativity
and innovation’. The borough’s wider influence will grow so that it complements both its
London and Gatwick offers, and becomes a location for enterprises engaged in high-growth
sectors, taking fresh advantage of a new and dynamic skills base in the borough. The vision
proposes that enterprise centres and incubator units will be at the economic heart of
neighbourhoods, providing space for a creative and innovative business environment to
flourish.
Croydon Economic Development Strategy (2008)
In 2007/08, LB Croydon and the Croydon Local Strategic Partnership produced an Economic
Development Strategy (EDS) to form the strategic framework for the future economic
development of the borough.
The study highlighted several issues facing the local economy, notably: declining employment;
a high degree of reliance on the public sector; low rates of new business survival; and a
decline in the prosperity of knowledge-based sectors (though there the creative sector was
identified as buoyant).
The EDS drew out several strategic themes and intervention requirements: diversification of
the business base; improvement to the quality of the business environment; enhanced
external connectivity; town centre and external linkages; improvements to economic inclusion
and skills; attracting investment and improving image.
The office market was noted to contain a disproportionate amount of older stock (pre 1980’s).
The CMC was seen as suffering from having a poor image, characterised by tired looking
buildings and a lack of coherency – with Wellesley Road ‘cutting the town in two’. New
commercial space in the borough’s District centres was acknowledged as important for wider
regeneration in the borough.
The development pipeline carried the potential for realising significant investment and urban
renewal; however delays in the pipeline thus far, such as the failure to develop the East
Croydon Station site, were seen as a threat to achieving this.
Draft Economic Development Strategy Refresh (2009)
A draft ‘refreshed’ Economic Development strategy was produced in December 2009, for the
period 2010-2012, in order to take account of and address new challenges facing residents
and businesses created by the economic downturn. The refreshed strategy is primarily
focused on LB Croydon’s objective to position the borough, over the long term, as a major
economic centre within London and within the Gatwick Diamond area.
The refreshed strategy highlights three areas for intervention:
• Jobs, employability and skills
• Enterprise and innovation; and
• Inward investment.
As such the strategy is framed around the need to create the conditions necessary to raise
education and skills attainment, enhance entrepreneurship and attract new enterprise and
grow existing firms. To achieve this it aims to build upon the already well established status of
Croydon as a regional base for businesses by continuing to attract financial and insurance
service business HQ’s to the area. It also aims to capitalise, and further develop, on the
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 45
49353249
presence of major construction and engineering firms in the Borough, in order to create high-
skilled and learning opportunities and foster a sustainable economic base for the borough.
Already a key location for public administration, and related occupiers (accounting for a third of
all jobs in Croydon), the strategy seeks to promote the borough as a cost-efficient alternative
location to central London for these functions.
Cane Hill is identified as potential a site for a new specialist innovation park with ‘integrated
multiversity learning facilities on site’. The location is said to be suitable for national and
international businesses as it is accessible to Gatwick airport.
The strategy also highlights the potential to create a ‘Gatwick metropolitan area’ offer. Given
Croydon’s proximity to Gatwick airport and the potential for increased commercial route
development over the next decade there is said to be a real opportunity to position Croydon as
the preferred ‘airport city’ for businesses that need international connectivity and want the
benefits of being in London.
In relation to other non-B class employment generating land uses, the Strategy recognises
Croydon’s status as a primary retail, leisure and cultural destination for south London. It is
noted that the town centre and sites in the Purley Way area combined provide some 375,000
sqm of retail space, which is the largest retail offer outside of central London and generates
over 16,000 jobs.
Croydon Metropolitan Centre Area Action Plan - Issues & Options Report (2008)
An Area Action Plan (AAP) for the CMC was formerly being prepared but a Preferred Options
Report was put on hold in January 2009, although the evidence base for it will help inform both the
Core Strategy and, if progressed, the CMC Opportunity Area Planning Framework (OAPF).
The CMC AAP Issues and Options Report sets out an overall vision for the area for 2021. The
aspects of this vision, in relation to office, industrial and warehousing land are;
• ‘To be a centre of diversity and distinction which everyone wants to visit, work in, invest
and do business in; be firmly established as London's third City Centre - the main city
centre in the South East south of the Thames for business and employment and training;
and
• Be a City Centre with many different functions satisfying virtually all of the needs of all of
the local community for public and private services, and employment facilities.’
Among the relevant issues raised included; how the CMC might capitalise on its position as a
Strategic Office location by encouraging new Grade A modern office buildings, whilst still meeting
the requirements of small local firms; whether or not small workshops and warehouses should be
provided for in the CMC area, and; how the AAP could help establish a Cultural Quarter in the area.
Purley Town Centre Regeneration SPG (2004)
The Purley Town Centre Regeneration Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) was
adopted by the Council in April 2004 and amended in November of the same year. The
purpose of the SPG was to install a framework for the future development of the Town Centre
and to ensure that changes to the Town Centre fit with the objectives for the area set out in the
Regeneration Strategy.
In terms of land-use, the SPG supports and encourages mixed-use development, specifically
requiring an increase in local housing stock and retail opportunities. Live-work units are
encouraged in appropriate areas to help provide active street frontages.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 46
49353249
Core Strategy Evidence Base Documents
As the Core Strategy is being developed, the Council is continuing to gather evidence, which
will support and guide the development of both the LDF and Core Strategy. A number of the
evidence documents have been made available, and have been reviewed here.
Annual Monitoring Reports
The AMR measures the progress of planning policies towards targets and objectives between
April and March the following year. The findings of the two most recent monitoring reports are
worth considering:
The LB Croydon Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) 2007-2008 notes that, overall, there was a
net loss of 13,023 sqm of B use class floorspace in the borough during the period.
Newly completed industrial (B1b/c, B2 and B8) floorspace totalled 5,087 sqm, which was 50%
higher than in 2006/7 and all of which was light-industrial (B1c) floorspace. There was no loss
of designated employment land. It was estimated that 13.4% of the total floorspace in
designated Employment Areas was vacant. For office (B1a) floorspace a net loss of 5,708
sqm was recorded for the monitoring period, with 1,660 sqm of new floorspace being
completed.
The 2008-2009 LB Croydon AMR notes that between April 2008 and March 2009 there was a
net loss of 11,648 sqm B class use floorspace.
The completion of 8,946 sqm of new industrial floorspace was almost entirely within
designated employment areas and were for B2 and B8 uses. A change of use from B class to
retail (A1) use at a large site outside a designated Employment Areas, leads the Report to
state that that ‘this policy (EM5) is not protecting employment uses’. For office (B1a)
floorspace a net loss of 4,920 sqm was recorded for the monitoring period, despite the
completion of 8,248 sqm of new floorspace. There is also 24,317 sqm of B1a floorspace with
permitted planning permission in the CMC and Town Centres.
The AMRs show that since April 2007, there has been a net loss of 24,671 sqm of B use class
floorspace in the borough.
LB Croydon Retail Needs Study (2008)
In 2008, Croydon Council appointed Drivers Jonas to carry out a Retail Study to inform and
act as evidence base for the identification of issues and options and the selection of preferred
options required for preparation of both the Core Strategy DPD and Site Allocations DPD and
to enable the Council to make informed choices about the nature and extent of retail growth to
be accommodated within the borough in the future.
The Study identifies that current national trends in retailing are; continued polarisation towards
a smaller number of larger centres; the decline of the small convenience shop; continued
growth in the out-of-town retail offer and; increase in internet and mail order shopping. It notes
that these are the key trends that should be taken into account when planning for new retail
development in the Borough.
The findings of the study are mainly specific to the individual major and district town centre
areas, but in general the Study concludes that; outside the CMC, the primary purpose of the
centres is for convenience goods shopping; and there is a general shortage of retail sites,
particularly in the north of the Borough. The Study also recommends to the Council that they
downgrade Norbury from an identified Town Centre to a District Centre.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 47
49353249
Croydon Metropolitan Centre Retail Strategy (2009)
In 2009, LB Croydon appointed Drivers Jonas to assist the Council in reconsidering the retail
strategy for CMC, with particular reference to the need and opportunity to provide new retail
floorspace. The requirement for a Strategy originated from the failure of the Park Place
scheme to be developed and was then exacerbated by fragility in the market precipitated by
the economic downturn.
A key conclusion of the study was that Croydon has something a negative image, which
affects its standing and perception as a place to shop, and, at least anecdotally, this would
appear to cause occupiers to favour competing centres such as Bromley and Kingston,
Another conclusion was that although Croydon Centre contains a large amount of retail
floorspace, parts of the centre are underperforming in this respect and would benefit from
fresh investment. Complex land ownership within the centre is also seen as being an issue
and that, the study believes, the Council may be able to play a more important role in
facilitating land assembly. The study does confirm that Croydon is the largest shopping centre
in South London and continues to receive interest from large retailers.
Housing Briefing Note on Residential Development Potential in Croydon between 2009
and 2031
The council’s briefing note on residential development potential in Croydon between 2009 and
2031 provides estimates of the completions of new homes in Croydon over the period.
Outside of the OAPF area the data is based on the 2009 GLA Strategic Housing Land
Availability (SHLAA) data. Within the OAPF area the data is modelled (except for the number
of homes ‘under construction’) and is based on work on perimeter blocks previously done for
the former CMC Area Action Plan.
There are two scenarios for each time period:
1) 2011 to 2021: The CMC will continue to be a major location for offices in South London;
and the office market declines in the CMC declines and space is converted to residential
use
2) 2021 to 2031: The CMC continues to be a major location for offices in South London and
there is a lower rate of development on small sites and 800 homes in New Addington and
Fieldway; and there is a decline by half of the office floorspace in Croydon assumes and
that there are an additional 800 homes in New Addington and Fieldway
Under these scenarios the total housing projections are: 13,054; 15,144; 9,020; and 12,250
respectively.
At the time of writing, work is being undertaken on a housing typology study to assess the
potential for residential buildings in the CMC. It will be important to consider how the demand
and supply characteristics of employment land and other uses such as housing and retail can
be accommodated to plan for a vibrant CMC, and meet the needs of businesses and residents
alike.
Deprivation is not confined to Inner London and the index of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2007
reveals areas or pockets of deprivation in some Outer London boroughs such as LB Croydon,
which has the highest forms of deprivation within wards scattered to the north and south east
of the borough. New Addington holds is the most deprived super output area, which is in the
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 48
49353249
top 5% most deprived area. The CMC area lies across Fairfield and to a lesser extent east
Broad Green and west Addiscombe.
Local Enterprise Growth Initiative (LEGI)
LB Croydon is recognised as one of the UK’s largest local economies and recent years have
seen growth yet a gap in prosperity remains between the borough and much of South London,
especially in terms of small business growth. Such growth is deemed to be dependent on the
development of a buoyant start-up sector whereas LB Croydon currently has a comparatively
weak small business and entrepreneurial culture in relation to surrounding areas.
Croydon Strategic Partnership was successful in the first round of the Local Enterprise Growth
Initiative (LEGI) in gaining funding for the development of its small business base and wider
entrepreneurship in the borough. The original fund of £77 million, to be spent over ten years,
was designed to remove barriers and market failures that inhibit small businesses and
entrepreneurship. There three core objectives of the LEGI programme were to: increase the
entrepreneurial potential of key target groups in North West Croydon and New Addington ;
support the creation of new businesses, the sustainable growth of existing businesses and
reduce the failure rate of locally-owned business in North West Croydon and New Addington –
Fieldway; and attract inward investment and franchising into the North West Croydon and New
Addington areas, making use of local labour sources.6
The first year of delivery was focused on the neighbourhood renewal areas of North West
Croydon and Fieldway and New Addington. North West Croydon accounts for the following
wards: Norbury, Upper Norwood, Thornton Heath, South Norwood, Bensham Manor, West
Thornton, Woodside, Broad Green, Selhurst, Waddon, Addiscombe and Ashburton. Two
outlying estates were also included: Shrublands, in Shirley, and Monk’s Hill, in Heathfield.
Croydon businesses and individuals from outside the target areas were eligible for support,
but the priority was clients from the deprived areas.
When funding was un-ringfenced and subsequently became part of the Area Based Grant, it
was determined that a focus on communities furthest away from mainstream economic
activity, rather than strict geographical boundaries, would better meet the priorities of the
borough. Since 2008, LEGI has been a borough-wide programme with services available to
all residents and businesses based in Croydon, with a focus on engaging people from
deprived areas and key target groups: BME communities, older people aged 50yrs+, women,
young people aged 18-24, NEETs, people with disabilities, people on long-term benefits.
More recently, since 2009, LEGI has formed part of the Area Based Grant (ABG) which
includes a range of funding streams received from central government departments. In-year
savings to the ABG were announced in early June this year, including a 23% reduction to
LEGI revenue resources for 2010/11. Accordingly, the Council is currently reviewing the
impact to ABG locally and the final internal allocation to the LEGI programme will be
determined during summer 2010.
In the context of the current economic downturn and the required in-year savings, LEGI capital
programmes are currently on hold, subject to a review of available resources, suitability of
schemes, and sustainability of the investment plan.
6 LB Croydon Baseline, Targets & Monitoring Performance (2006)
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 49
49353249
Croydon Metropolitan Centre Masterplans
There are five masterplans proposed within the LB Croydon’s Town Centre. This ambition is
determined in Third City Vision (after Westminster and the City of London, Croydon city district
is the third largest population centre), which is the result of the work of architect Will Alsop in
consultation with the inhabitants of Croydon.
Currently there are five masterplan within the CMC7, which in total could provide for 156,070
sqm8:
1. East Croydon Masterplan 1 (Draft Final Report 6th May 2010) comprising 273,755
sqm, of which 146,620 sqm is proposed for office
2. Mid Croydon Masterplan, comprising 85,000 sqm, of which 9,000 sqm is office
3. West Croydon Masterplan (Draft report 30th March 2010) comprising 51,470 sqm, of
which 450 sqm is office
4. College Green Masterplan (Final Draft plus forward issue, 19th April, 2010) comprising
35,602 sqm with no space proposed for office; and
5. Wellesley Road and Park Lane (at concept stage in April 2010), comprising 36,500
sqm and proposals to reconsider the use of the CMC main road, which currently
separates the town centre, into a lively and liveable centre.
The draft masterplan proposals indicate the potential for 156,070 sqm of office floorspace to
come forward within the planning period. The masterplans therefore have the potential to bring
about create significant economic and societal benefits.
Other Relevant Documents and Programmes
Croydon Office Market Review (2007)
In 2007, PACEC, in association with Knight Frank LLP were commissioned by LB Croydon
and Croydon Enterprise to undertake an office market assessment, to ‘provide evidence to
inform the Issues and Options stage in the preparation of the Croydon Metropolitan Centre
Area Action Plan. The study is also likely to be extended to provide evidence required for the
preparation of other of Croydon’s development plan documents (DPD), such as the Core
Strategy and Site Allocation DPDs.’
The review notes the key features of Croydon to be well provided transport access with well-
qualified labour markets and good access to markets, however, the quality of office stock is
generally perceived to be poor, with a disproportionate amount dating from pre-1970s, and
also that the image of Croydon as a business location is currently poor.
In terms of supply and demand, the report identified that the future supply of sites amounted to
between 255,000 sqm and 368,000 sqm of floorspace. The lack of development at the East
Croydon Station site was reported to be causing a supply ‘bottleneck’ for new space in the
CMC. Three floorspace demand forecasts were produced to estimate future demand in LB
Croydon: baseline, unconstrained and partially-constrained forecasts – the former and latter
forecasts being based on the GLA 2006 employment projections data (Economic Current
7 Figures as per correspondence with the Council, 8
th June 2010
8 As per email from the Council, 11
th June 2010
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 50
49353249
Issues Note 13). Over the planning period (2006 – 2026), the review forecasts a range of
estimates for total future employment in offices – from 52,400 to 65,100 (baseline and
unconstrained). This translates as a net floorspace requirement of between 48,200 sqm and
213,600 sqm.
Industrial/Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment (2008)
In 2008, as part of the preparation for its Core Strategy, Site Allocations and Development
Control DPDs (Development Plan Documents), LB Croydon, with the assistance of South
London Business, Kingston University and Stiles Harold Williams, produced an Industrial and
Warehousing Land/Premises Market Assessment. Whilst the Development Plan period
(relating to the Core Strategy) lasts until 2026, the scope of the Assessment was limited to
forecasting demand and supply up until 2015.
The assessment concluded that there was 754,100 sqm of industrial/warehouse premises
floorspace and 155,991 sqm of land in Croydon. 16% of the Borough’s industrial floorspace
was lost to non-industrial uses between 1998 and 2006, and that there is increasing pressure
from uses providing little in the way of employment benefit – particularly self-storage – in
designated employment areas. Two positive factors identified in the assessment were the
steady growth in industrial/warehousing rents and better frictional availability than in
neighbouring boroughs, i.e. Richmond-upon-Thames and Bromley.
In terms of market demand for land/premises, the assessment notes a slight drop in demand,
a strong increase in take-up, and a large fall in availability of premises, since 2000.
Considered together, this pointed to there being a healthy level of demand, with demand
possibly beginning to outstrip supply.
The study projected that supply would decline by approximately 34,000 sqm by 2015, as a
result of change of use. Taking account of a positive demand forecasted for premises under
the mid-point scenario, a shortfall of 82,665 sqm was forecast. The assessment concluded
that there are very few opportunities, in terms of development sites, to enable the
development of new stock. It also concludes that the emerging LDF policy position needs to
take this into account.
3.5 Summary
At a national level, several PPSs and PPGs highlight the need to plan land-use efficiently and
in a way that is conducive to sustainable economic development. PPS4 emphasises the need
to be flexible in catering for B use class needs and that Local Planning Authorities (LPAs)
should plan for new and emerging sectors and sectors that they wish to attract to their
authority. To ensure that producers of waste are located close to processing facilities, PPS10
sets out a number of criteria that LPAs should consider when allocating land for these
purposes.
Key regional policy on employment land-use is contained in the London Plan (2008) and GLA
Industrial Capacity SPG (2008). The London Plan sets out its vision for the South-West
London sub-region, of which LB Croydon is a part, which centres around; optimising the
development of its Opportunity Areas; exploit the strength of the Metropolitan town centres;
managing the release of surplus industrial land and; planning effectively for transport
improvements.
Defining industrial employment as activities relating to manufacturing and wholesale
distribution, the GLA’s Industrial Capacity SPG (2008) seeks to ensure that an adequate stock
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 51
49353249
of land for industrial use remains whilst the release of surplus industrial land is monitored and
managed, so planning objectives can be met effectively. The SPG categorises LB Croydon as
a borough for ‘Restricted Transfer’ as it has a low level of industrial land relative to demand.
Both the SPG and London Plan establish that there are two SIL areas in LB Croydon; Purley
Way9 and Marlpit Lane. Policy 3 of the SPG also highlights the need to protect ‘Locally
Significant Industrial’ sites.
At a local level, the evidence base for Croydon’s LDF is currently being prepared and the Core
Strategy DPD is currently at the Preferred Options Stage. As a result the Croydon
Replacement Unitary Development Plan (UDP) adopted in 2006 is the Borough’s principal
statutory Development Plan.
LB Croydon recognises that it has not fulfilled its economic potential over the past decade.
Documents such as the borough’s Economic Development Strategy and the Croydon Vision
highlight aspirations for the city to become a major economic centre within London and the
south east. The borough’s geographic position lends itself to being a cost efficient alternative
location to central London, and the centre is an attractive location for back office operations,
such as financial services. Croydon’s economic future cannot rely solely upon its locational
advantages. The EDS recognises the importance of developing a workforce that holds the
skills, knowledge and flexibility to underpin enterprise development, attract higher value
industries and raise the wealth creation and earning potential of local residents and
businesses.
There is need to promote new inward investment opportunities, through major sites in the
CMC (in particular the masterplans); other outer-CMC locations such as Cane Hill; and build
business diversity in the borough through the provision of employment land in local, district
and town centres, which can support local business.
9 Local planning policy further refines the Purley Way area into Purley Way North and Purley Way South.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 52
49353249
4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
To fully understand the economic potential the LB Croydon, it is necessary to take into
account the current socio-economic characteristics of the borough. This section profiles the
borough population, deprivation levels and distribution, industrial structure, enterprise and the
labour market structure. By doing so we begin to identify some of the opportunities and
constraints, which could impact upon the demand and supply for employment land. Data for
Croydon is benchmarked against Greater London and the UK for direct comparison.
4.2 Population
Demand for housing, retail, community facilities and employment sites and premises will be
driven in part by population. Between 1991 and 2008 Croydon’s population increased by 8.2%
to 341,800. This growth rate is slower than that of London, which over the same period grew
by 11.6% but greater than that of Great Britain which grew by 6.8% respectively. Forecasts by
the GLA show that Croydon’s population is expected to be 11% higher in 2031 than in 2008.
The implication is that there is likely to be a growth in demand for land for housing, community
facilities, infrastructure and employment land over the LDF plan period.
Key population characteristics of the borough residents are set out in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Summary of Population Characteristics
LB Croydon (%) Greater London (%) Great Britain (%)
Ag
e G
rou
ps
0-19
20-59
60-74
75+
22.1
55.8
5.5
6.7
23.9
60.4
7.2
8.5
24.1
54.1
10.2
11.7
Te
nu
re Owner Occupied
Council or RSL
Private Rented
68.7
16.8
12.2
56.5
26.2
14.3
68.7
19.3
8.8
So
cia
l G
rou
p *
AB
C1
C2
DE
25.4
35.8
12.1
26.5
26.5
33.0
11.0
29.5
22.2
29.7
15.1
33.0
Source: ONS MYE 2009 and Census 2001 AB = Upper and middle class (Higher managerial, administrative or professional) C1 = Lower middle class (Supervisory or clerical and junior managerial, administrative or professional) C2 = Skilled working class (Skilled manual workers) DE = Working class OR those at lowest level of subsistence (Semi and unskilled manual workers OR Casual or lowest grade workers, pensioners and others who depend on the state for their income)
With regard to home ownership, it can be seen from Table 4.1, that 16.8% of residents in the
LB Croydon are tenants of Council or Registered Social Landlords (RSL), which is below the
average of 26.2% for London and also below the average of 19.3% for England. In addition
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 53
49353249
68.7% of the population are owner-occupiers, which is significantly lower than the London
average of 56.5%.
Table 4.1 also shows that LB Croydon has a large proportion of its population classed within
the C1 social-group, which is higher than the average of 33.0% for London, and of England
(29.7%). However, while the percentage of the population classed within the higher AB social-
groups in the borough is 25.4%, this is lower compared with the average of 26.2% for London,
but higher compared with the national average of 22.2%. 26.5% of the borough’s population
were classed in the lower DE social groups in 2001, which was lower than both the average
for London and Great Britain respectively.
4.3 Deprivation
The picture of education skills and training deprivation corresponds closely to the map of IMD.
Three super output areas (SOAs) within LB Croydon fall in the top five per cent of the nations
most deprived SOAs. The level of education, skills and training achievement is linked with
income and employment attainment, and deprivations for all correspond closely. Income
deprivation levels are pronounced - indicative of a lower-wage workplace economy. The
highest employment deprivation occurs in New Addington, Broad Green, South Norwood and
Upper Norwood. The theme of ‘Jobs, Employability and Skills’ is a leading priority of the
Economic Development Refresh10
, which states the importance ‘to drive up adult skills levels
and raise the competitiveness of Croydon residents in the local and London employment
market.’ (p. 8).
10 Economic Strategy Refresh 2010 – 2012, Draft Version 4 15 December 2009
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 54
49353249
Figure 4.1: Croydon Index of Multiple Deprivation
Source: Croydon Observatory, ONS IMD2007
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 55
49353249
4.4 Labour Market Structure
Business investment decisions are typically based on the availability of land / sites, capital and
labour. Below we consider the labour market by profiling the broad occupational breakdown,
earnings and the travel to work catchment of residents.
Occupational Structure
In terms of occupational structure, statistics indicate that approximately 47.1% of the working
population in Croydon, are employed in managerial, professional and associate professional
occupations, which is lower than the rest of London at 53.7% and higher than Great Britain at
43.9%. This is presented in Table 4.2 below.
In 2009, 218,600 people in the LB Croydon (equivalent to 63.9% of the population) were of
working age11
, compared with 66.9% in London and 62.0% nationally. Approximately 189,400
were economically active (equivalent to 80.9% of the working age population), which is a
higher proportion compared to 75.8% for London and 78.9% nationally. In addition 85.5% of
males were economically active, while 76.1% of females were economically active.
Earnings by Resident
In 2009 the average gross weekly earnings for LB Croydon residents is £566.70, which is
approximately £32 lower than the London average of £598.60, and £76 higher than the rest of
Great Britain. This has increased by £105.50 since 2002, an increase of 22% (directly
comparable to 21% in London and 22% nationally). Residents’ of LB Croydon earn more than
those people who work in LB Croydon (by £37 per week). This earnings differential implies
that the LB Croydon economy is a comparatively lower earnings economy and as such
residents commute out of the borough to access better paid jobs. See Table 4.3.
Travel to Work
Croydon has excellent transport links and a large labour catchment area, which put it in a
favourable position within South London with regards to customer accessibility, supply chain
dynamics and competitive advantage. Using ‘Travel to Work’ data from the 2001 Census it is
possible to extrapolate the percent of workforce in terms of method of travel, as shown in
Table 4.4.
The majority of Croydon’s residents work in the borough itself, 78,408 (54.8%), according to
Travel to Work. Of out-commuters, 10,580 (7.4%) residents work in Westminster, and 10,580
(4.7%) work in Lambeth.
The above text refers to the three tables overleaf.
11 The working-age population refers to men aged 16 to 64 and women aged 16 to 59.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 56
49353249
Table 4.2: Employment by Occupation
Croydon
(numbers)
Croydon
(%)
London
(%)
Great Britain
(%)
Managers and senior officials 27,000 15.6 17.8 15.7
Professional occupations 21,600 12.5 17.1 13.4
Associate professional & technical 32,800 19.0 18.8 14.8
Administrative & secretarial 24,000 13.9 11.1 11.2
Skilled trades occupations 16,000 9.2 7.6 10.4
Personal service occupations 16,500 9.5 7.1 8.5
Sales and customer service 12,500 7.2 6.1 7.5
Process plant & machine
operatives 8,000 4.6 4.6 6.8
Elementary occupations 13,900 8.0 9.2 11.3
Source: ONS annual population survey, 2009
Table 4.3: Average Gross Weekly Earnings
Borough / Comparator Average Gross Weekly
Earnings:
Residents
Average Gross Weekly
Earnings:
Workplace
LB Croydon £566.70 £529.60
London £598.60 £627.40
Great Britain £491.00 £490.20
Source: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2009
Table 4.4: Travel to Work, LB Croydon Residents
Method of Travel Number of People % Workforce
Driving a car or van / passenger in car or
van
67,918 43.4
Train 32,819 20.9
Bus, minibus or coach 18,259 11.7
Works mainly at or from home 13,372 8.5
On foot 12,705 8.1
Underground, metro, light rail or tram 6,553 4.2
Motorcycle, scooter or moped 2,031 1.3
Bicycle 1,615 1
Other 713 0.5
Taxi or minicab 756 0.5
Total 156,741 100
Source: Neighbourhood Statistics, Census 2001
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 57
49353249
Qualifications
As of December 2008, the workforce in LB Croydon was slightly more qualified than the
London average, with 89% of individuals holding a qualification (compared to 88% in Greater
London). However, only 33.7% of the population have a degree or higher degree, which is
lower than the average for London which is 39%. This is shown in Table 4.5 below
Table 4.5: Qualifications
Croydon
(numbers)
Croydon
(%)
London
(%)
Great Britain
(%)
NVQ4 and above 73,200 33.7 38.6 29.0
NVQ3 and above 110,800 51.0 51.6 47.0
NVQ2 and above 145,000 66.8 63.8 65.2
NVQ1 and above 174,900 80.6 73.7 78.9
Other qualifications 17,200 7.9 14.2 8.7
No qualifications 24,900 11.5 12.0 12.4
Source: ONS Annual Population Survey 2008
Unemployment
The October 2008- September 2009 annual population survey shows that the unemployment
rate in LB Croydon was 8.1% (15,300), which is slightly lower than that of London (8.4%) and
higher than that of Great Britain (7.4%). This is the highest rate of unemployment witnessed in
the borough since February 1997 and has increased from the July 2007 – June 2008 figure of
5.1%.
As of April 2010, there were 9,588 claimants of Job Seeker’s Allowance (JSA), equivalent to
4.4% of the working age population, which is equal to the London average (4.4%) and greater
than the Great Britain (4.1%) average.
There are 42,000 (19.1%) people considered to be economically inactive in the borough, and
of these 12,400 (29.5%) are looking for work, with 29,600 (70.5%) not seeking employment.
These figures are lower in comparison to London where economic inactivity is reported for
24.2% of the working age population.
4.5 Company Size and Registration
This section details the number and size of businesses in the LB Croydon, and recent
changes in the stock businesses with LB Croydon as their place of VAT registration.
Business Size
Small businesses contribute significantly to employment within the borough, with 10,899
companies employing between one and ten employees, comprising 87% of the 12,775
companies registered within the borough and accounting for 26,598 employees. The
proportion of SMEs in the economy is similar to that of both London and Great Britain, where
they account for 85% and 87% of businesses respectively.
While large companies employing more than 200 people number only 86, equivalent to 0.7%
of all companies in the borough, they provide 46,677 jobs. In a reflection of wider trends, this
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 58
49353249
number of businesses as a proportion of total businesses is the same as both the London and
Great Britain proportion (both 0.7%).
Table 4.6 demonstrates that since 1998, the number of small businesses located within the
borough has continued to grow.
Business Registration and De-registration
Business registrations, and deregistration, provide an insight into the economic activity of the
borough and ability to support and retain business. In 2008, there were approximately 1,800
new business registrations, and 1,245 de-registrations - a net increase of 555 businesses. By
number of businesses, LB Croydon has grown by 10% between 1998 and 2008; however this
is much lower than the growth Greater London has seen. Micro and small (less than 11)
businesses, have contributed most to this growth rate.
Table 4.6: Business Units by Size Band, 1998-2008
Croydon Greater London
1998 2008
Change
1998 -
2003
1998 2008
Change
1998 -
2003
Employment
Band12
Number % Number % % % % %
1 to 10 9,699 85.1% 10,889 87.0% 12.4 86.2 87.5 18.9
11 to 49 1,235 10.8% 1,194 9.5% -3.3 10.4 9.3 4.8
50 to 199 374 3.3% 341 2.7% -8.8 2.6 2.5 11.7
200 or more 91 0.8% 86 0.7% -5.5 0.8 0.7 5.2
Total 11,400 100 12,775 100 9.8 100 100 17.1
Source: ONS, Annual Business Inquiry
4.6 Industrial Structure
Latest data shows that there are approximately 130,500 people employed in LB Croydon.
Below we set out the industrial structure of the borough and key sectors.
Broad Industrial Employment
Table 4.7 sets out the industrial structure of LB Croydon by employment. Overall, the borough
has seen a 3% growth in workplace employment between 1998 and 2008 (latest ONS data),
which is significantly less than the Greater London rate of 11%.
12 Businesses are measured here as data units. These do not readily correspond to the commonly
used firms, companies or businesses by which employers are sometimes identified.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 59
49353249
Table 4.7: Employment in LB Croydon by Broad Industrial Groups
Industry 1998 % of
total 2008
% of
total
Change
(Actual)
Agriculture, hunting and forestry 37 0.02 192 0.1 155
Energy and Water 1,076 0.8 51 0.03 -1,025
Manufacturing 9,293 7.3 4,165 3.2 -5,128
Construction 7,574 5.9 6,368 4.9 -1,206
Distribution, Hotels and restaurants 31,848 25.1 29,164 22.3 -2,684
Transport and communication 10,362 8.2 7,186 5.5 -3,176
Banking, Finance and Insurance 35,992 28.4 37,344 28.6 1,352
Public administration, Education and
Health 24,877 19.6 38,998 29.9 14,121
Other Services 5,796 4.6 7,029 5.4 1,233
Total 126,856 100 130,493 100 3,637
Source: ONS, Annual Business Inquiry. These figures do not include self-employed individuals Note that figures do not always add up to exact sum due to rounding
Public Administration, Education and Health Services
The most significant sector in terms of level of employment in the borough is the Public
Administration, Education and Health Services sector, which between 1998 to 2008, grew by
approximately 56.7%, equivalent to 14,121 new jobs, and now accounts for 29.9% of the
employment in the borough. Many of these jobs are office-based, through the location of
central government operations such as the Home Office. Employment in the sector is greater
than the average for London of 28.2%, and the UK of 26.9%. It was also the biggest growth
sector in terms of employee numbers in the borough during the period 1998 to 2008. The
growth of this sector has off-set the large falls in other sector such manufacturing; transport
and communication; and distribution, hotels and restaurants. If the employment of the public
administration, education and health sector were not included employment rate between 1998
and 2008 would be –10.3%.
The growing dependency on the public sector employment will invariably impact on economic
diversity and economic resilience, economic vibrancy and perception of place to ‘do’ business,
the attraction of private sector inward investment, average earnings and social mobility.
Banking and Financial Services
LB Croydon is home to major financial service companies with back and mid offices functions.
By employment, the Banking and Finance sector is the second largest sector for the borough,
representing over one quarter (28.6%) of the total employment in the borough. This is higher
than the average for London of 19.4% and the UK average of 21.6%. However, the sector
experienced only modest growth amounting to approximately 3.8% (1,352 jobs) since 1998.
Manufacturing
In a reflection of wider trends, employment in manufacturing declined by 55.2% between 1998
and 2007, from 9,293 to 4,165 over the period.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 60
49353249
Table 4.7 below summarises the changes in the employee numbers for each sector in the LB
Croydon between 1998 and 2087.
Creative and Cultural Industries
There are over 11,500 jobs in the creative and cultural sector13
, representing 8.9% of all jobs
in the borough. The actual number and proportion of workplace jobs held in creative and
cultural businesses has fallen over the past 5 years from 12,380, representing a decline of
6.4%. Comparatively, the proportion of the CCI sector across Greater London is significantly
higher at 13.2%, and has grown since 2003 by 9.2%.14
By employment the largest sub-sectors
of the CCI sector are Computer Games, software, electronic publishing; Fashion; and
Architecture, though the employment held in Architecture has declined significantly in recent
years.15
Table 4.8: LB Croydon Creative and Cultural Industries by Workplace Employment
Proportion of total CCI sector
2003 2008 Change
2003-2008
LB Croydon London
Advertising 280 190 -32% 1.6% 6.9%
Architecture 2,980 2,110 -29% 18.2% 12.7%
Art and Antiques 2,280 2,600 14% 22.4% 10.6%
Computer Games,
software, electronic
publishing
1,570 2,630 68% 22.7% 16.6%
Fashion 1,460 1,450 -1% 12.5% 16.1%
Museums and other
cultural facilities
300 360 20% 3.1% 3.1%
Music and the Visual
and Performing Arts
560 510 -9% 4.4% 7.0%
Publishing 2,710 1,440 -47% 12.5% 14.8%
Radio and Television 10 40 300% 0.3% 7.1%
Video, film and
photography
240 250 4% 2.2% 5.1%
Total 12,380 11,580 -6% 100.0% 100.0%
Source: Annual Business Inquiry
The CCI sector is dominated by small businesses and a large proportion of businesses fall
under the VAT threshold of £70,000 turnover per annum. Due to HM Revenues and Customs
13 Based on 4-digit Standard Industry Classifications (SIC) as per DCMS’ Evidence Toolkit (August 2004) and other relevant
literature by the Greater London Authority (London’s Creative Sector: 2004 Update (GLA, 2004), GLA Economics and TBR
Economics (April 2006))
14 Annual business inquiry workplace analysis, 2003 and 2008 data
15 This may be due to a number of factors such as the relocation of a large business or the business’ SIC coding being redefined
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 61
49353249
disclosure rules there is no accessible data to assess the contribution of non-VAT enterprises/
organisations. The Small Business Service estimates there are 4.3million enterprises in the
UK, which indicates there are approximately 2.2million of non-VAT enterprises in the UK
economy, that is non-VAT represent 51% of all businesses. 16
Based upon this fact, non-VAT enterprises in the cultural sector in Croydon are likely to
comprise in the region of 50% of all CCI businesses. The CCI sector is therefore estimated to
support a total of 23,160 jobs across the borough.
Research by NESTA17
recognises the importance of creative occupations outside the creative
industries sector - that is those employed in creative jobs in non-creative industries, for
instance a graphic designer employed in a council. NESTA estimates that the ratio of
creatively employment in creative industries to creatively occupied outside the creative sector
is 1:0.5218
. On this basis, a broad estimate for creative employment and the creatively
occupied in LB Croydon would be approximately 35,200.
4.7 Inward investment
Data on inward investment was difficult to access and limited in detail. Croydon Economic
Development Company (CEDC) however provided data that recorded successful investments
between January 2009 and January 2010. During this period 199 companies relocated to
Croydon from other parts of the UK. Most of these companies (80%) comprised small
companies with between one and 10 employees (132 companies of size one to five
employees, and 28 of size six to 10 employees). The total employment held by these
companies was 1,721.
Data on relocation enquiries (some successful relocations, some not) was also limited, though
the CEDC provided data on relocation enquiries from outside Croydon during 1st June 2009 to
30th June 2010. The data suggests that predominantly enquiries were made by the retail
sector, though interest in Croydon came from a wide range of sectors including retailers and
restaurants, education / child care providers, and to a more limited extent finance, insurance
and media companies. The size of premises sought was typically for small space - between
300sqft (27.9 sqm) to 4,000 sqft (372 sqm), the median being 1,250 sqft (116 sqm). The
largest space sought was by companies involved in retail or education.
4.8 Home-working
As the travel to work statistics in Table 4.4 show over 13,000 people, or 8.5% of LB Croydon’s
economically active workforce, work from home. Working from home is becoming a more
popular option, not only for the self employed but also the employees of SME to large
companies and organisations alike.
Over the last decade, many businesses and organisations have introduced flexible working.
The UK has experienced a growth in home-working since 199719
. ONS data from 2005, the
16 www.sbs.gov.uk/smes
17 National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts
18 Beyond the Creative Industries: Mapping the creative economy in the United Kingdom (NESTA, Technical report; January
2008)
19 Home-working is taken to mean ‘office type work carried out by employees working from/at home’ (Dwelly, T. & Bennion, Y.
(2003) ‘Time to Go Home – embracing the home-working revolution’)
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 62
49353249
latest data available, recorded over 2.4 million people working at home with a telephone and
computer for at least a day a week (defined as teleworkers – a subcategory of home-workers),
and that the number of teleworkers had grown on average by 13% per annum since 1997.
SMEs are particularly active in supporting home-working – a The British Chambers of
Commerce survey found that 90% of SME offer some form of non-standard work pattern.20
However, a large proportion of larger businesses now offer flexible working practices - the
latest CBI / Pertemps Employment Trends Survey found that 46% of all employers offer
teleworking in some form21
and the growth in home-working has been highest among
employees, who now outnumber the self-employed.
Compared with the rest of the workforce, UK teleworkers are highly qualified and are twice as
likely to be graduates – a recent survey found that 80% of teleworkers are managers or
professionals22
; and around three-quarters of teleworkers are in the private sector.
The key drivers behind the trend in home-working can be identified as: technology, demand by
employees; employer initiatives; and new policies by UK and EU.
Despite the growth and promotion of home working in recent years and the adoption of flexible
practices by employers, home working has often been reactive to employee demand rather
than a proactive drive by business. For example, Chartered Institute of Personnel and
Development (CIPD) research found that 69% of employers never or only occasionally accept
requests to work from home23
. A survey of HR managers in businesses across the UK found
that only 25% had switched office roles to home working, and although many felt it was a
growing trend, it was only relevant to a small number of their employees24
. The same survey
reported that the average percentage of staff working from home was 7.8% in organisations
where home working is encouraged.
Home-working has a number of implications for office space, these include:
• Supporting a home office is generally much cheaper than supporting an office space.
Home-working could lead to a reduction in demand in office space. The office space
can be re-rationalised by desk-sharing or for other office-space strategies
• The demand for the type of office space may change – Surrey County Council now
runs ‘tele-centres’ for its staff to work closer to home as an alternative to working at
County Hall; and
• Real estate costs / leasing costs may fall.
The implications for employment space in Croydon include:25
20 Work and life: How business is striking the right balance (British Chamber of Commerce, April 2007)
21 CBI / Pertemps Employment Trends Survey, September 2008
22 Quoted on ‘Prospects’ – the UK’s graduate careers website
23 CIPD, Labour Market Outlook, 2008
24Ceridian, Business Practices and Attitudes Relating to Home Working – A survey of Human Resource professionals in UK
businesses, 2006.
25 Some of these points were raised by PACEC in their review of the Croydon Office Market, September 2007
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 63
49353249
• Home-working reduces the need to be located close to the workplace. Increased
locational flexibility could see employees relocate away from urban areas to more
rural / less accessible areas
• Increasing home-working may see a fall in demand for office space but only if home-
workers work mainly from home
• Demand for business support centres which act as a central point for home-workers –
i.e. a communal area closer to employees’ homes with appropriate
telecommunications and facilities installed; and
• Demand for office space as part of residential developments.
Overall, home working is a viable alternative to office working; however, the actual number of
home-workers is a comparatively small proportion of the total workforce, and the growth in
home working is likely to be steady rather than rapid. Croydon has a comparatively lower-
skilled workforce and smaller proportion of the occupational classification is managerial and
professional – a segment which tends to have a higher rate of home working. Further research
would be required to determine whether there could be sufficient demand for business support
centres of the style that Surrey County Council has developed.
4.9 Summary
Latest population figures record a total population of 341,800 in LB Croydon, which is an
increase of 8.2% since the last census of 1991. 218,600 residents are of working age. The
majority of the borough’s residents (53.8%) live in social housing, which is double the average
for London (26.2%).
80.9% of the working-age population is economically active, slightly higher than London
average (75.5%) and the UK average (78.8%).
47.1% are employed in managerial, professional and associate professional occupations,
compared to 52.8% in London and 42.9% in the UK as a whole.
The average gross weekly earnings for residents is £566.70, which is significantly lower than
the Greater London average workplace earnings; however the majority of residents work
within the borough itself (54.8%).
October 2008 to September 2009 the unemployment rate in Croydon was 8.1%, which was
greater than that of London (6.3%). This is the highest rate of unemployment witnessed in the
borough since February 1997.
The contribution of small businesses to employment in the borough is sizeable, with
businesses employing one to ten employees, accounting for 85% of its registered businesses
and approximately 26,600 jobs.
In 2008, 1,800 new businesses were registered in the borough and 1,245 were deregistered,
giving a net increase of 555 businesses.
In terms of key industrial sectors, public administration accounts for 29.9% of employment,
and has grown by approximately over 50% between 1998 and 2008. Also of importance is
employment in banking, finance and insurance; distribution, hotels and restaurants, which
together account for 50.9% of total employment.
ONS records the total workplace employment in creative and cultural sector in LB Croydon to
be 11,580 in 2008, which is a decline of 6% on 2003 figures. However, if estimates for non-
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 64
49353249
VAT and the creatively occupied are included, the employment held in creative industries
would be around 35,000.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 65
49353249
5 QUALITY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EMPLOYMENT LAND – ‘LOCAL’
OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSING
5.1 Introduction
This section provides a summary of the key findings of the field survey and desk research and
identifies the suitability of clusters for local office (B1a) and industry/warehousing (B1b/c, B2
and B8) land use. Results are summarised to provide an overview of conditions of
employment clusters. Detailed and extensive field and desk research results were collected as
part of the research and analysis.
LB Croydon has two distinctive office markets: the area within the CMC and the area outside
the CMC. These two geographies have different forms of demand and supply characteristics
and as such it is more useful to consider them separately. This section reviews the quality and
characteristics of the local office alongside the industrial and warehousing clusters which is
also located outside the CMC and caters for a smaller catchment of demand; whereas the
following section presents the results of the CMC clusters.
5.2 Employment Clusters
Table 5.1 lists the 30 employment clusters in LB Croydon, outside the CMC boundary, which
were surveyed against the site appraisal criteria set by URS and agreed with the Council. In
total the clusters comprise 248.5ha. The location of these clusters is shown in Figure 2.1.
The survey methodology and criteria are based on factors and issues set out in PPS4 (2009),
the GLA Industrial Capacity SPG (2008) and the DCLG Employment land Review guidance
note (2004). These criteria have been tailored and refined based on the consultancy team’s
experience and the specific context within Croydon.
Our assessment of supply of employment land has included a review of clusters’ suitability for
office (B1a), and industrial/ warehousing (B1b/c and B2; and B8) land-uses. As user demands
and site-specific characteristics for the two types of employment use classes differ, our
analysis has considered site suitability against both sets of criteria. An example of this is that
B1 land users usually require better access to public transport than industrial (B2/B8) land
users who require better access to A-roads. The assessment criteria used are included as
Appendix A.
It is important to note that the 248.5 hectares of land contained within employment clusters
includes a range of different uses. These employment clusters also include some residential,
retail, sui generis, leisure and community uses. The comparative analysis of the quality and
characteristics of clusters for employment use in this section is carried out on the basis of the
quantity of land contained within the lined boundaries of clusters.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 66
49353249
Table 5.1: Surveyed Employment Clusters
URS
Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Name of Cluster LB Croydon Adopted UDP
(2006) Designation / Site
Proposals
Total
Employment
Cluster Area
(ha)
C1 Thornton Road Employment Area 4.7
C2a Purley Way North (East of Purley Way) Strategic Employment Area 28.7
C2b Purley Way North (Progress Way/ Commerce Way) Strategic Employment Area 24.4
C2c Purley Way North (North of Tramlink Bridge) Strategic Employment Area 8.3
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area) Strategic Employment Area 2.8
C3a Purley Way South (Imperial Way/Lysander Road) Strategic Employment Area 22.8
C3b Purley Way South (Queensway/Kingsway/Princes Way) Strategic Employment Area 10.4
C3c Purley Way South (Junction of Stafford Road/Purley
Way)
Strategic Employment Area 0.7
C4 Union Road Employment Area 3.3
C5a Gloucester Road (West of) Employment Area 5.3
C5b Gloucester Road (East of) Employment Area 3.2
C6a Selsdon Road (North) Employment Area 2.6
C6b Selsdon Road (Central) Employment Area 2.1
C6c Selsdon Road (South) Employment Area 2.1
C7 Vulcan Way Employment Area 9.2
C8a Marlpit Lane (West of A23) Strategic Employment Area 5.8
C8b Marlpit Lane (East of A23) Strategic Employment Area 14.2
C9 Bensham Grove * 2.1
C10 Hastings Road (Harris & Bailey Site) * 2.0
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) * 2.5
C12 Cane Hill Major Devl Site in Green Belt 4.0
C13 Upper Norwood District Centre 8.4
C14 Norbury Town Centre 10.2
C15 Thornton Heath Town Centre 9.7
C16 South Norwood District Centre 13.9
C17 Selsdon District Centre 4.8
C18 New Addington District Centre 6.5
C19 Purley Town Centre 19.4
C20 Coulsdon Town Centre 10.1
C21 Addiscombe Local Centre 4.4
Total 248.5
Source: URS LB Croydon Employment Land Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters. * = Non-designated employment sites i.e. not protected within the Strategic Employment Area or Employment Areas
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 67
49353249
5.3 Cluster Suitability for B1a Land-use
As local office (B1a) users and uses require different site characteristics than industrial
(B2/B8) users, we have assessed cluster suitability for these respective employment land-
uses separately. Outside the CMC, which contains the overwhelming majority of office
floorspace in the borough, there are several other areas that contain a supply of office
floorspace, notably the designated town centre areas of Purley and Norbury. Drawing upon
our field survey and desk-based research, we have reviewed cluster suitability for office uses
based on the strength of the characteristics below.
Access to Public Transport
PPS4 stresses the importance of having good access to public transport as being a key
characteristic in clusters where B1 land-use predominates. In our analysis, access to public
transport for employment clusters was assessed through PTAL (Public Transport Accessibility
Levels) maps from 2008, supplied by Transport for London (TfL). PTAL ratings correspond to
the distance from any given point to the nearest public transport stops and frequency of
service. The result is a grade from 1-6 (including sub-divisions 1a, 1b, 6a and 6b) where a
PTAL of 1a indicates very poor access to the location by public transport, and a PTAL of 6b
indicates very good access by public transport26
. For the purpose of this study we have
categorised each PTAL rating into broad descriptive groups:
Very Poor PTAL 0 or 1A or 1B
Poor PTAL 2
Moderate PTAL 3
Good PTAL 4
Very Good PTAL 5, 6a, 6b
As shown in Table 5.2 below, of the 30 clusters surveyed, 15 were recorded as having very
poor or poor access to public transport, with nine clusters recorded with very good or good
access to public transport. Those clusters that scored very good or good together comprised
81.9ha and were mainly small employment areas and neighbouring residential or shopping
areas and are listed in Table 5.3 below.
26 Where a cluster occupied more than one PTAL zone, an average of all the zones was used.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 68
49353249
Table 5.2: Access to Public Transport
Rating Number of Clusters
Very Good 4
Good 5
Moderate 6
Poor 12
Very Poor 3
Total 30
Source: URS LB Croydon Employment Land Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters.
Table 5.3: Clusters with Very Good or Good PTAL Ratings
URS Cluster No. Employment Area/Areas Size (ha)
C4 Union Road 3.3
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) 2.5
C13 Upper Norwood 8.4
C14 Norbury 10.2
C15 Thornton Heath 9.7
C16 South Norwood 13.9
C19 Purley 19.4
C20 Coulsdon 10.1
C21 Addiscombe 4.4
Total 81.9
Source: URS LB Croydon Employment Land Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters.
Access to Facilities and Amenities
In accordance with the policy guidance set out in PPS4, it is required that clusters where B1a
land-use predominates have doorstep access to facilities and amenities so that the needs of
employees and, indeed the businesses, are adequately served. Employment clusters access
to facilities and amenities has been assessed through a study of the LB Croydon UDP
Proposals Map 2006 and observations made during the field survey.
The following criteria were used to assess clusters access to amenities:
Very good Shops, restaurants and/or cafes and personal services within the
business cluster or can be reached in a 5-minute walk. There is a
selection of places for lunch; there is the possibility to do some
shopping during lunch.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 69
49353249
Good Shops, restaurants and/or cafes within a 5-10 min walk. There is
some selection of places for lunch and other services.
Poor Shops, restaurants and/or cafes within a 10–20 min walk. There is a
limited selection of places for lunch.
Very poor Shops, restaurants and/or cafes more than a 20 min walk away. No or
very limited selection of places for lunch.
The survey found that 15 employment clusters had very good access to facilities and
amenities. These clusters are listed in Table 5.4 below. No clusters were reported as having
very poor access to nearby amenities, which is what one would expect to find in a London
Borough. Note that clusters which are identified as being designated centres in the Croydon
UDP are listed first, with other non-designated clusters listed underneath.
Table 5.4: Employment Clusters with Very Good access to Facilities and Amenities
URS Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Areas Cluster Area (ha)
C13 Upper Norwood 8.4
C14 Norbury 10.2
C15 Thornton Heath 9.7
C16 South Norwood 13.9
C17 Selsdon 4.8
C18 New Addington 6.5
C19 Purley 19.4
C20 Coulsdon 10.1
C21 Addiscombe 4.4
C2c Purley Way North (North of Tramlink) 8.3
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area) 2.8
C4 Union Road 3.3
C8a Marlpit Lane - West of A23 5.8
C10 Hastings Road (Harris & Bailey Site) 2.0
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) 2.5
Total 112.1
% of surveyed employment land 45
Source: URS LB Croydon Employment Land Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters.
Overall Quality of Employment Clusters
In total, 25 employment clusters were considered to be in Good or Very Good condition – the
vast majority of the 30 clusters surveyed. To receive this designation over 50% of sites within
the employment cluster had to fulfil the following criteria:
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 70
49353249
Building Condition
Very good – buildings in immaculate state, no signs of paint coming off, windows and window
frames in very good condition, immediate surrounding/grounds well kept.
Good – buildings in good condition, small areas where paint might come off, etc., grounds in
reasonable state.
Quality of environment and public realm
Very Good – the streets and the public realm within and surrounding the cluster are of very
good quality. There is sufficient street lighting and no perceived personal safety issues. The
business area is not polluted by noise or air pollution from neighbouring uses and/or heavy
street traffic.
Good – the streets and public realm within and surrounding the business cluster are of good
quality but it does not reach the ‘very good’ standard (some litter, street furniture shows signs
of aging, etc.) There are no perceived safety issues.
Employment Clusters with sites in Poor or Very Poor Condition
Five of the 30 surveyed employment clusters were recorded to have a majority (50-100%) of
sites in Poor condition. To receive this designation clusters had to fulfil the following criteria:
No clusters were assessed as being Very Poor.
Building condition
Poor – paint coming off, cracks and windows in poor state, plus surroundings are poorly kept.
Very Poor – building still in use but in very poor condition; paint coming off in large areas,
some windows broken, surroundings not maintained and/or littered and/or cluttered with
rubbish.
Quality of environment
Poor – the streets and the public realm within and surrounding the business area are of poor
quality (potholes, litter, poorly maintained or damaged street furniture). There is not enough
street lighting and some perceived safety issues. The business area might be polluted by
noise or air pollution from neighbouring uses and/or heavy street traffic.
Very poor – the streets and the public realm within and surrounding the business area are of
very poor quality (potholes, litter on street, not collected rubbish, etc.) There is not enough
street lighting and there are perceived safety issues. There is noise and/or air pollution from
neighbouring uses and/or heavy street traffic.
Table 5.5 below lists the employment clusters with a majority (50-100%) of sites that were in
Poor and Very Poor condition.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 71
49353249
Table 5.5: Employment Clusters with Sites in Poor or Very Poor Condition
URS
Cluster No.
Employment Area/Areas Cluster Area (ha)
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area) 2.8
C3c Purley Way South (Junction of Stafford Road/Purley Way) 0.7
C4 Union Road 3.3
C6a Selsdon Road (North) 2.6
C9 Bensham Grove 2.1
Total 11.5
% of surveyed employment land 5
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
5.4 Cluster Suitability for Industrial Land-use
This section is an assessment of the cluster suitability for B1b/c and B2/B8 land uses based
on different criteria than that used to assess cluster suitability for B1a uses. The most relevant
and significant criteria include the following:
• Strategic road access
• Extent of bad neighbour uses
• Servicing of businesses
• Availability of parking.
Strategic Road Access
Through a study of Transport for London Road Safety Network map, and observations made
during the field survey, employment clusters access to the strategic road network was
assessed using the following criteria:
Very good Directly accesses Transport for London Road Network roads (TLRN)
(A22, A23 or A232)
Good Is within 200m of a TLRN road
Poor/ Very Poor Access is via B class roads/unclassified roads
The clusters with very good access to the strategic road network are listed in Table 5.6 below.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 72
49353249
Table 5.6: Employment Clusters with Very Good or Good Strategic Road Access
URS
Cluster No.
Employment Area/Areas Cluster Area (ha)
C1 Thornton Road 4.7
C2a Purley Way North (East of Purley Way) 28.7
C2b Purley Way North (Beddington Farm Road/Progress Way/
Commerce Way) 24.4
C2c Purley Way North (North of Tramlink) 8.3
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area) 2.8
C3a Purley Way South (Imperial Way) 22.8
C3b Purley Way South (Queensway/Kingsway/Princes Way) 10.4
C3c Purley Way South (Junction of Stafford Road/Purley Way) 0.7
C8a Marlpit Lane - West of A23 5.8
C8b Marlpit Lane - East of A23 14.2
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) 2.5
C12 Cane Hill 4.0
C14 Norbury 10.2
C19 Purley 19.4
C20 Coulsdon 10.1
Total 169.0
% of surveyed employment land 68
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
Bad Neighbourhood Uses
Clusters were surveyed for any signs of potential bad neighbourhood issues resulting from the
activities within the cluster27
. Bad neighbourhood issues include the following negative
externalities; noise pollution, air pollution, smell, HGV traffic, significant car traffic, and any
other specific negative impacts, such as open storage.
Although 12 out of the 30 surveyed employment clusters were identified as generating at least
one of the externalities listed above, these were only deemed to be ‘bad neighbourhood uses’
where there was an obvious impact on sensitive uses, such as residential areas and
community facilities, in the surrounding neighbourhood. Where there is no impact of the
externality on the surrounding land use, the clusters are not scored negatively. In total, only 4
clusters had two or more bad neighbourhood uses.
27 Clusters could have more than one potential bad neighbourhood issue.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 73
49353249
Table 5.7: Employment clusters with 2 or more Bad Neighbourhood Uses
URS Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Areas Size (ha)
C2a Purley Way North (East of Purley Way) 28.7
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area) 2.8
C6a Selsdon Road (North) 2.6
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) 2.5
Total 36.6
% of surveyed employment land 15
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
Servicing of Businesses
For clusters where industrial land-use predominates, it is important that there is designated
and adequate space for the servicing of businesses. The suitability of existing servicing
arrangements within each cluster was assessed during the field survey.
The field-survey identified only three clusters where servicing was deemed to be Inadequate -
the remainder having currently Adequate servicing for businesses needs. These clusters are
listed in Table 5.8 and account for 3% of the surveyed employment land.
Table 5.8: Employment Clusters where Servicing of Businesses is Inadequate
URS Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Areas Cluster Area (ha)
C6b Selsdon Road (Central) 2.1
C9 Bensham Grove 2.1
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) 2.5
Total 6.7
% of surveyed employment land 3
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
Availability of Parking
For clusters where industrial land-use predominates, it is important that there is adequate
parking space to accommodate for the needs of businesses within the cluster and the
increased likelihood that employees will travel to work by car, given that public transport
accessibility is likely to be lower. The availability and type of parking within each cluster was
assessed during the field survey.
The field-survey identified eight clusters where parking was deemed to be inadequate. These
clusters are listed in Table 5.9 and account for 10% of the surveyed employment land.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 74
49353249
Table 5.9: Employment Clusters where Parking is Inadequate for Industrial Uses
URS Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Areas Cluster Area (ha)
C3c Purley Way South (Junction of Stafford Road/Purley
Way) 0.7
C4 Union Road 3.3
C5a Gloucester Road 5.3
C5b Gloucester Road 3.2
C6a Selsdon Road (North) 2.6
C6b Selsdon Road (Central) 2.1
C8a Marlpit Lane - East of A23 5.8
C9 Bensham Grove 2.1
Total 25.1
% of surveyed employment land 10
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
Suitability for Accommodating Workspace for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
There is no exact criteria for assessing sites/clusters against for suitability for accommodating
SME workspace, as potential to develop space will be often based on development
opportunity and other factors not related to quality. The criteria used to determine whether a
cluster is suitable for accommodating SMEs have been developed from URS’ professional
judgement and experience of undertaking employment land reviews and business
accommodation needs assessments, and consultations with stakeholders, and comprise;
• Good public transport accessibility (PTAL Rating of 3, 4, 5, 5A or 5B)
• Good access to facilities and amenities
• Existing presence of suitable small office/studios/workshops (which might be
indicative of demand, or better enable businesses to cross pollinate and exploit
economies of agglomeration)
• Presence of established SME sector, and
• Vacant developable land.
Based on the strength of these characteristics, ten clusters have been identified as being
suitable locations for accommodating workspace suitable for SMEs. These are listed in Table
5.10.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 75
49353249
Table 5.10: Employment Clusters with potential to accommodate SME Workspace
URS Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Areas Cluster Area (ha)
C2b Purley Way North (Progress Way/ Commerce Way) 24.4
C2c Purley Way North (North of Tramlink Bridge) 8.3
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area) 2.8
C4 Union Road 3.3
C8a Marlpit Lane - West of A23 5.8
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) 2.5
C12 Cane Hill* 4.0
C13 Upper Norwood 8.4
C14 Norbury 10.2
C19 Purley 19.4
Total 88.9
% of surveyed employment land 36
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters * = Following discussions with the Council, Cane Hill was identified as a site with potential for accommodating SME workspace, potentially as part of an incubation or innovation facilities.
Presence of Non-B class Occupiers
Through recording the presence of individual land uses/ occupiers during the field survey, 6
clusters within UDP designated Employment Areas were identified where over 5% of the
cluster area was occupied by non-B class land uses, usually sui generis or retail activities.
These clusters are listed in Table 5.11. Sui generis activities include a range of industries
which, though they may be employment generating, do not fall in the B1, B2 or B8 use class
order but nevertheless are often associated with industrial sites in particular, such as petrol
filling stations, premises selling and/or displaying motor vehicles, taxi businesses, and scrap
yards.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 76
49353249
Table 5.11: Clusters within Designated Employment Areas with a significant presence
of Non-B class Occupiers
URS Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Areas Cluster Area (ha)
C2c Purley Way North (North of Tramlink) 8.3
C3c Purley Way South (Junction of Stafford Road/Purley
Way) 0.7
C4 Union Road 3.3
C5a Gloucester Road (West of) 5.3
C6b Selsdon Road (Central) 2.1
C8a Marlpit Lane - West of A23 5.8
Total 25.5
% of surveyed employment land 10
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
Vacant Developable Land Sites
In order to be considered as developable, a vacant land site has to be large enough to be built
on for employment premises. This might include open land not landscaped, underused car
parks, under-used yards and under-used land behind buildings. Premises that are vacant, but
fit for occupation/ actively marketed are not considered as being vacant developable land.
Table 5.12 shows that, in total, there is approximately 6.4 ha of vacant land across six
employment clusters (approximately 3% of the total land area of the 30 clusters surveyed).
Table 5.12: Clusters containing Vacant Developable Land
URS Cluster
No.
Employment Area/Areas Vacant Land
(ha)
Cluster Area
(ha)
C2a Purley Way North (East of Purley Way) 0.4 28.7
C3a Purley Way South (Imperial Way) 2.0 22.8
C3b Purley Way South (Queensway/Kingsway/Princes
Way)
0.5 10.4
C5a Gloucester Road (West of) 0.4 5.3
C6b Selsdon Road (Central) 0.4 2.1
C7 Vulcan Way 1.3 9.2
C8a Marlpit Lane - East of A23 1.4 5.8
Total 6.4 78.5
% of surveyed employment land 3 32
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 77
49353249
5.5 Summary of Employment Clusters outside the CMC
URS’ qualitative survey of employment land clusters in LB Croydon (outside the CMC)
involved site visits of 30 employment clusters (including sub-clusters a, b, c etc.) and desk-
based research. Site appraisal criteria was set by URS and agreed with the Council. Owing to
the different site characteristics required by office (B1a) and industrial (B1b/c, B2 and B8)
users, the analysis assessed cluster suitability for these use classes separately. In addition,
cluster suitability for accommodating SME workspace was also assessed, to fit with the
aspirations of an ‘enterprising borough’.
For office land use suitability, analysis of PTAL levels deduced that 9 of the 30 employment
clusters had good or very good accessibility to public transport – a key characteristic for office
land-use suitability. 15 clusters were assessed as having very good access to facilities and
amenities (also of importance to office users), based on their proximity to designated town/
local centres. Condition of buildings and public realm quality within clusters was generally
considered to be good or very good with only five clusters having a majority of sites being of
poor/very poor quality.
With respect to industrial land use suitability, the borough contains several strategic (TLRN)
roads. 15 clusters were viewed to have good/very good access to the wider road network. A
further indication of the generally good stock of industrial sites in the borough, only four
clusters have bad neighbour issues with surrounding land use, and only three have
inadequate servicing arrangements. Parking is an issue in eight of the industrial clusters
surveyed.
There were six clusters identified where non B-class land uses made up a notable proportion
of the land area, mainly composed of retail or sui-generis businesses. Seven clusters contain
vacant developable land, totalling 6.4 ha, which is a good indication of the well-functioning
status of the industrial land market in Croydon. Based on their characteristics, 10 clusters
were assessed as having potential to accommodate SME workspace, though it is noted that
potential to develop space will often be based on development opportunity.
In summary, the borough’s current supply of Strategic Employment Areas and other
Employment Areas is considered to be in healthy condition, characterised by the presence
and availability of good quality premises, access to the wider road network, and the low
amount of vacant land. Some clusters do also present opportunity for intensification.
As a summary, Table 5.12 draws together the information presented in Tables 5.2 to 5.11.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 78
49353249
Table 5.12: Summary of Site Survey Results for Employment Clusters Outside CMC, as Presented in Tables 5.2 to 5.11
URS
Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area
(ha)
Very
Good/Good
PTAL
Rating
Very Good
Access to
Facilities and
Amenities
Majority of Sites
in Poor or Very
Poor Condition
Very Good/Good
Strategic Road
Access
Two or more
Bad
Neighbourh
ood uses
Servicing of
Businesses is
Inadequate for
Industrial Uses
Parking is
Inadequate for
Industrial Uses
Potential to
Accommodate
SME
Workspace
Significant
presence of
Non-B class
Occupiers (in
Employment
Areas)
Vacant
Developable
Land
C1 Thornton Road 4.7 ����
C2a Purley Way North (East of Purley Way) 28.7 ���� ���� ����
C2b Purley Way North (Progress Way/ Commerce Way) 24.4 ���� ����
C2c Purley Way North (North of Tramlink Bridge) 8.3 ���� ���� ���� ����
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area) 2.8 ���� ���� ���� ���� ����
C3a Purley Way South (Imperial Way/Lysander Road) 22.8 ���� ����
C3b Purley Way South (Queensway/Kingsway/Princes Way) 10.4 ���� ����
C3c Purley Way South (Junction of Stafford Road/Purley Way) 0.7 ���� ���� ���� ����
C4 Union Road 3.3 ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ����
C5a Gloucester Road (West of) 5.3 ���� ���� ����
C5b Gloucester Road (East of) 3.2 ����
C6a Selsdon Road (North) 2.6 ���� ���� ����
C6b Selsdon Road (Central) 2.1 ���� ���� ���� ����
C6c Selsdon Road (South) 2.1
C7 Vulcan Way 9.2 ����
C8a Marlpit Lane (West of A23) 5.8 ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ����
C8b Marlpit Lane (East of A23) 14.2 ����
C9 Bensham Grove 2.1 ���� ���� ����
C10 Hastings Road (Harris & Bailey Site) 2.0 ����
C11 Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site) 2.5 ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ����
C12 Cane Hill 4.0 ���� ����
C13 Upper Norwood 8.4 ���� ���� ����
C14 Norbury 10.2 ���� ���� ���� ����
C15 Thornton Heath 9.7 ���� ����
C16 South Norwood 13.9 ���� ����
C17 Selsdon 4.8 ����
C18 New Addington 6.5 ����
C19 Purley 19.4 ���� ���� ���� ����
C20 Coulsdon 10.1 ���� ���� ����
C21 Addiscombe 4.4 ���� ����
Source: URS, 2010
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 79
49353249
6 QUALITY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EMPLOYMENT LAND – CMC
OFFICE CLUSTERS
6.1 Introduction
This section provides a summary of the key findings of the field survey and desk-based
research of 16 employment land clusters in the CMC boundary. Figure 2.2 shows the location
of those clusters within the CMC. In total, the CMC clusters surveyed within the CMC
boundary comprise a total area of 49.9 ha.
The walk around survey and desk-based assessment collected information for a qualitative
and quantitative capacity assessment of office stock in the CMC clusters with the overarching
objective to assess the suitability of clusters in accommodating new office development on
vacant land / in the place of derelict buildings, or intensification of office stock through the
redevelopment of existing stock or rebuild.
Appendix B sets out all criteria involved in the appraisal of CMC clusters. Key factors that
help to determine the suitability of a CMC cluster for office development include:
• Good access to Public Transport - high PTAL ratings, provision of parking and
services
• Poor quality environment: public realm, building stock and building age
• None or few physical or policy constraints: bad neighbour, topographical, ecological
• Low intensity of existing use: vacancy of building / floorspace; low density (low plot
ratio or low building height in relation to surrounding land use and building height); and
• Simple forms of ownership: sites which are less fragmented and do not have multiple
owners may be more easily organised for development. We consider ownership in
more detail as part of development constraints in Section 10.
Below we set out analysis of the first four points listed above.
6.2 CMC Clusters Surveyed
Table 6.1 presents those sites within the CMC which were surveyed for their potential capacity
for office intensification or redevelopment. Figure 2.2 maps these clusters.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 80
49353249
Table 6.1: Surveyed CMC Clusters
URS
Cluster no.
Name Area (hectares)
CMC 1a West Croydon Masterplan (East side) 1.9
CMC 1b West Croydon Masterplan (West side) 4.6
CMC 2a East Croydon Masterplan (East of station tracks) 3.0
CMC 2b East Croydon Masterplan (Station and West of station tracks) 6.8
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street) 1.4
CMC 3b Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park Street) 2.9
CMC 3c Mid Croydon Masterplan (South of Katherine Street) 3.7
CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of College Road) 0.8
CMC 4b College Green Masterplan (South of College Road) 5.1
CMC 5 Old Town: Cairo New Road 0.9
CMC 6 Mason’s Avenue and Croydon Flyover 1.7
CMC 7 North of Bedford Park 0.9
CMC 8 Land between Sydenham Road and Bedford Park 1.4
CMC 9 Land between Landsdowne Road and Sydenham Road 1.1
CMC 10a George Street and Landsdowne Rd (Dingwall Road) 0.8
CMC 10b George Street and Landsdowne Rd (George Street) 0.7
CMC 10c George Street and Landsdowne Rd (Wellesley Road) 2.3
CMC 11a Whitgift Centre (Wellesley Road side) 2.1
CMC 11b Whitgift Centre (North End) 3.3
CMC 12a North End and Lennard Rd End (East of London Road) 1.1
CMC 12b Parson’s Mead and North (West of London Road) 1.3
CMC 13 Cross Road 0.6
CMC 14 Car Park to north of Lansdowne Rd 0.9
CMC 15 Church Rd / Croydon Flyover 0.3
CMC 16 South of Old Town (a, b, c and d) 0.5
Total 49.9
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, May 2010, Calculations may not always sum due
to rounding
6.3 Access to Public Transport
The majority of clusters in the CMC have high PTAL ratings indicating excellent access to
public transport. However, there are a number of sites located in comparatively less
accessible locations, as listed below in Table 6.2. These sites are likely to attract less
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 81
49353249
developer interest due to comparatively lower levels of accessibility or distance from locations
of high footfall.
Table 6.2: CMC Clusters with Less Favourable Access to Public Transport
URS Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area Area (hectares)
CMC 5 Old Town: Cairo New Road 0.9
CMC 6 Mason's Avenue and Croydon Flyover 1.7
CMC 15 Church Rd / Croydon Flyover 0.3
CMC 16 South of Old Town (a, b, c and d) 0.5
Total 3.4
% of surveyed employment land 6.6
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the
clusters
Cluster 6 is considered to be somewhat constrained due to its location south of the A232
Croydon Flyover, which is some distance from both mainline stations (East and West
Croydon). Although Cluster 5 and 16a to 16d are well served by the Tramlink, they have
comparatively lower PTAL ratings in comparison to the rest of the CMC area.
6.4 Access to Quality Facilities and Amenities
The CMC area, in-keeping with its London Plan designation as a Metropolitan Centre,
contains a range of leisure, service and retail opportunities, which are considered to be key
locational influences for B1 office occupiers. The majority of sites/clusters are located within
easy walking distance of food retailers/restaurants, however some areas were assessed as
being better located to quality restaurants and food retail than others. In general, sites on the
Wellesley Road/George Street axes or close to Croydon High Street, were assessed as
having good access in this respect. Clusters with comparatively poorer access to quality
facilities are listed in Table 6.3.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 82
49353249
Table 6.3: CMC Clusters with access to a Smaller Range of Quality Facilities
URS Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area Area (hectares)
CMC 1a West Croydon Masterplan (East side) 1.9
CMC 1b West Croydon Masterplan (West side) 4.6
CMC 5 Old Town: Cairo New Road 0.9
CMC 7 North of Bedford Park 0.9
CMC 12a North End and Lennard Rd End (East of London
Road) 1.1
CMC 12b Parson’s Mead and North (West of London Road) 1.3
CMC 13 Cross Road 0.6
CMC 16 South of Old Town (a, b, c and d) 0.5
Total 11.8
% of surveyed employment land 24
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the
clusters
6.5 Quality of Environment and Building Stock
Consultation with property agents and business forums, and information contained within the
London Plan and the LOPR, has established that quality of environment and public realm is an
issue affecting the attractiveness of the CMC as a business location. However, public realm
can be improved through redevelopment of a site / block and therefore should not be
perceived as a factor which significantly deters development. Although some clusters, for
example, C8 and C9, and C4b – shown in Table 6.3 - were considered to have very good
quality of environment and public realm, six clusters were identified as being of a poorer
standard – as shown in Table 6.4.
Table 6.3: CMC Clusters with Very Good Quality Public Realm
URS Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area Area (hectares)
CMC 1a West Croydon Masterplan (East side) 1.9
CMC 4b College Green Masterplan (South of College Road) 5.1
CMC 8 Land between Sydenham Road and Bedford Park 1.4
CMC 9 Land between Landsdowne Road and Sydenham
Road 1.1
Total 9.5
% of surveyed employment land 4
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the
clusters
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 83
49353249
Table 6.4: CMC Clusters with Poor Quality Public Realm
URS Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area Area (hectares)
CMC 1b West Croydon Masterplan (West side) 4.6
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street) 1.4
CMC 3b Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park
Street) 2.9
CMC 6 Mason's Avenue and Croydon Flyover 1.7
CMC 12a North End and Lennard Rd End (East of London Road) 1.1
CMC 12b Parson's Mead and North (West of London Road) 1.3
Total 13.0
% of surveyed employment land 26
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the
clusters
The CMC area contains a wide range of office floorspace in terms of both quality and age, with
a large proportion of 1970s and 80s stock concentration. Clusters where the majority of
building stock dated from pre 1970s and/or where predominant building condition was
assessed as being identified as being in poor or very poor condition are shown below in Table
6.5.
Table 6.5: CMC Clusters with Poor or Very Poor Quality Building Stock and Pre-1970’s
Stock*
URS Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area Pre-
1970’s
Stock
Poor /
Very Poor
Stock
Area
(ha)
CMC 1b West Croydon Masterplan (West side) ���� 4.6
CMC 2a East Croydon Masterplan (East of station tracks) ���� ���� 3.0
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street) ���� ���� 1.4
CMC 3b Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park
Street) ���� 2.9
CMC 13 Cross Road ���� ���� 0.6
CMC 14 Car Park north of Lansdowne Rd ���� 0.9
Total 13.4
% of surveyed employment land 27
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the
clusters
* = Based on visual inspection
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 84
49353249
6.6 Physical or Planning Policy Constraints
Physical
Very few sites were observed to have physical, topographical or ecological constraints, which
would hinder their prospect for redevelopment or intensification. Several sites were identified
as being somewhat constrained by their proximity to infrastructure, particularly rail and tram-
lines. These were;
• Cluster 1a
• Cluster 2a
• Cluster 2b, and
• Cluster 5.
Cluster 7 currently has an uncompleted granted planning application for mixed-use, including
some B1a office floorspace.
Planning Policy
Sites/clusters which form parts of masterplan or other site-specific planning guidance areas,
though providing prime development opportunity, may be preferred locations for particular
uses, which may include or preclude commercial office development. There are nine sites in
the CMC area which are constituent parts of the four masterplan areas – West, Mid and East
Croydon respectively, and College Green. These are shown in Table 6.6 below and,
importantly, total 61% of surveyed land. Two sites are also known to have active planning
applications that include commercial office provision, which are;
• Cluster 4a (part of), and
• Cluster 7.
Table 6.6: CMC Clusters within Masterplan Areas
URS Cluster No. CMC Cluster Area Area (hectares)
CMC 1a West Croydon Masterplan (East side) 1.9
CMC 1b West Croydon Masterplan (West side) 4.6
CMC 2a East Croydon Masterplan (East of station tracks) 3.0
CMC 2b East Croydon Masterplan (Station and West of station tracks) 6.8
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street) 1.4
CMC 3b Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park Street) 2.9
CMC 3c Mid Croydon Masterplan (South of Katherine Street) 3.7
CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of College Road) 0.8
CMC 4b College Green Masterplan (South of College Road) 5.1
Total 30.2
% of surveyed employment land 61
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 85
49353249
6.7 Intensity of Existing Use
We are interested in identifying those clusters which could potentially increase the provision of
office capacity. As well as access, quality of the public realm, quality of building stock and
awareness of physical and policy constraints, factors which determine the potential for a
cluster to accommodate office development include:
• The existence of vacant land or derelict buildings
• The existence of buildings of low height compared to surrounding buildings (number of
storeys), and
• Buildings with small plot ratios i.e. a small proportion of the site is taken up by the
building footprint
Each of these factors are considered separately.
Vacant Land and Derelict Buildings
Clusters with vacant land and/or derelict buildings were observed in the following locations:
Table 6.7: CMC Clusters with Vacant Land and Derelict Buildings
URS
Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area Vacant
Land
Derelict
Buildings
Cluster
Area
(hectares)
CMC 2a East Croydon Masterplan (East of station tracks) ���� 3.0
CMC 2b East Croydon Masterplan (Station and West of stn) ���� 6.8
CMC 3b Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park St) ���� 2.9
CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of College Road) ���� 0.8
CMC 7 North of Bedford Park ���� 0.9
CMC 10a George Street and Landsdowne Rd (Dingwall Road) ���� 0.8
CMC 12a North End and Lennard Rd End (East of London Rd) ���� 1.1
CMC 13 Cross Road ���� 0.6
CMC 16b South of Old Town ���� 0.0
Total 16.9
% of surveyed employment land 34
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the
clusters
Buildings of Low Density (Height)
The field survey identified several areas of the CMC where current building height was
considered to be less than that achievable on-site, given surrounding building heights/
townscape and based on professional judgement. Clusters containing such buildings are
shown in Table 6.8 below.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 86
49353249
Table 6.8: CMC Clusters with Buildings of Low Height
URS
Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area Estimated
height of Low
Building
Cluster Area
(hectares)
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street) 3 1.4
CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of College Road) 3 0.8
CMC 9 Land between Landsdowne Road and Sydenham Rd 4 1.1
CMC 10a George Street and Landsdowne Rd (Dingwall Road) 4 0.8
CMC 10b George Street and Landsdowne Rd (George Street) 3-6 0.7
Total 4.8
% of surveyed employment land 10
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the
clusters
Clusters with a Low Building Density – Plot Ratio
Buildings with a small footprint in relation to their site (plot ratio) may have the potential to
increase their plot ratio and their development density. Employment clusters were considered
to have a low building to plot ratio if less than or equal to 50% of the plot was occupied by
building(s) footprints. This was often observed to be the case where large car
parking/servicing areas were attached to buildings. Five clusters were identified, as shown in
Table 6.9. It should be noted that several clusters with low plot ratios, contained buildings
greater than 10 storeys in height.
Table 6.9: CMC Clusters with Buildings that have a Low Plot Ratio
URS
Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area Estimated
plot ratio
Cluster Area
(hectares)
CMC 6 Mason’s Avenue and Croydon Flyover 20 1.7
CMC 8 Land between Sydenham Road and Bedford Park 35 1.4
CMC 9 Land between Landsdowne Road and Sydenham Rd 50 1.1
CMC 12b Parson’s Mead and North (West of London Road) 15 1.3
CMC 13 Cross Road 25 0.6
CMC 14 Car Park north of Lansdowne Road 40 0.9
Total 7.0
% of surveyed employment land 14
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the
clusters
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 87
49353249
6.8 Summary of CMC Clusters
URS’ qualitative survey of the CMC area comprised a review of 16 separate sites, with sites
being sub-divided where appropriate, totalling 49.9 hectares of land. Desk–based research
complemented the site visits. Site assessments were carried out against site appraisal criteria
set by URS and agreed with the Council. The overarching objective was to assess the
suitability of clusters in accommodating new office development on vacant and under-used
land.
PTAL levels indicated that the vast majority of clusters were highly accessible. However, four
surveyed clusters were considered to have comparatively less favourable access. Six sites
were highlighted as having poor quality of public realm, with three of these – all in west/mid
Croydon - also containing poor quality or outdated (pre 1970s) building stock. Few sites were
observed to have physical, topographical or ecological constraints, which would hinder their
prospect for redevelopment or intensification, though four were assessed to have rail/road
infrastructure adjacent to the site. In total, 61% of the quantum of land surveyed lay within the
CMC masterplan areas.
In terms of land-use intensity, a total of nine sites, dispersed across the CMC area, contained
either vacant developable land or derelict buildings. Focused along Wellesley Road, five sites
were identified as having low building height relative to their surroundings or spatial location,
with sites with a small building footprint in relation to their site being found at five surveyed
locations.
As a summary, Table 6.10 draws together the information presented in Tables 6.2 to 6.9.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 88
49353249
Table 6.10: Summary of Site Survey Results for Employment Clusters within the CMC, as Presented in Tables 6.2 to 6.9
URS
Cluster
No.
CMC Cluster Area
(ha)
Less
Favourable
Public
Transport
Access
Small Range of
Quality
Facilities
Very Good
Quality
Environment/
Public Realm
Poor Quality
Environment/
Public Realm
Poor/Very Poor
Quality or Pre
1970s Building
Stock
Physical/Planni
ng Policy
Constraints
Vacant Land or
Derelict
buildings?
Low Building
Height
Low Building-
Plot Ratio
CMC 1a West Croydon Masterplan (East side) 1.9 ���� ���� ����
CMC 1b West Croydon Masterplan (West side) 4.6 ���� ���� ���� ����
CMC 2a East Croydon Masterplan (East of station tracks) 3.0 ���� ���� ����
CMC 2b East Croydon Masterplan (Station and West of station tracks) 6.8 ���� ����
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street) 1.4 ���� ���� ���� ����
CMC 3b Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park Street) 2.9 ���� ���� ���� ����
CMC 3c Mid Croydon Masterplan (South of Katherine Street) 3.7 ����
CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of College Road) 0.8 ���� ���� ����
CMC 4b College Green Masterplan (South of College Road) 5.1 ���� ����
CMC 5 Old Town: Cairo New Road 0.9 ���� ���� ����
CMC 6 Mason’s Avenue and Croydon Flyover 1.7 ���� ���� ����
CMC 7 North of Bedford Park 0.9 ���� ���� ����
CMC 8 Land between Sydenham Road and Bedford Park 1.4 ���� ����
CMC 9 Land between Landsdowne Road and Sydenham Road 1.1 ���� ���� ����
CMC 10a George Street and Landsdowne Rd (Dingwall Road) 0.8 ����
CMC 10b George Street and Landsdowne Rd (George Street) 0.7
CMC 10c George Street and Landsdowne Rd (Wellesley Road) 2.3
CMC 11a Whitgift Centre (Wellesley Road side) 2.1
CMC 11b Whitgift Centre (North End) 3.3
CMC 12a North End and Lennard Rd End (East of London Rd) 1.1 ���� ���� ����
CMC 12b Parson’s Mead and North (West of London Road) 1.3 ���� ���� ���� ����
CMC 13 Cross Road 0.6 ���� ���� ���� ���� ����
CMC 14 Car Park to north of Lansdowne Rd 0.9 ���� ���� ����
CMC 15 Church Rd / Croydon Flyover 0.3 ����
CMC 16 South of Old Town (a, b, c and d) 0.5 ���� ���� ����
Source: URS, 2010
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 89
49353249
7 MARKET ANALYSIS
7.1 Introduction
This section provides Stiles Harold Williams’ (property market specialists located in Croydon)
overview of the LB Croydon’s commercial property markets.
As previously mentioned there are two separate geographies of demand and supply operating
in LB Croydon: the CMC office market, and the local office and industrial/ warehousing market.
The CMC office market primarily caters for headquarters and larger companies seeking a key
location within South London, prepared to pay higher rents and with a wider market, and
potentially supplier and workforce catchment area. Outside the CMC a different office market
operates which caters for a distinctly different demand profile and as such presents a different
supply profile from the CMC. This is defined as a ‘local’ B1a office market, catering for the
needs of SMEs across a smaller property market area. The industrial and warehousing market
is also considered to operate at a local level and as such the B1b/c, B2 and B8 market is
assessed alongside the local office market. See Figure 7.1.
A review of the CMC office market is presented first (7.2 to 7.7) followed by a review of the
local office, industry and warehousing market (7.8 to 7.13).
7.2 CMC Market Overview
Definition
We have defined the CMC office property market area as the South London Fringe Property
Market Area (SLFPMA), which includes:
• Inner London: Southwark, Wandsworth, Lambeth and Lewisham
• Outer London: Croydon, Bromley, Sutton, Merton; and
• Surrey: Reigate and Banstead.
The property market area represents the area of search a business or organisation may
consider when seeking property. Typically locations within the area of search offer comparable
locational advantages and a similar range of benefits occur in each location. If looking to
locate in the area, firms will have already made a strategic decision to place themselves in this
part of the South East. Each office centre within the SLFPMA can all be said to provide the
following benefits: good internal and external transport links; a diverse but well educated
workforce and; a wide range of housing stock, coupled with amenities and social infrastructure
to support a diverse workforce.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 90
49353249
Figure 7.1: Property Market Areas and Major Transport Routes
Source: URS
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 91
49353249
CMC Overview
This section considers the role and position of the CMC office market within the SLFPMA and
wider London market.
Croydon is located in the heart of the South London and Surrey region and therefore, in many
ways, the strengths of the region are also the strengths of the CMC office market. The CMC’s
position as a major transport hub in the region allows employers to draw on a large and
educated workforce as can be found in the region more generally. The transport links also
enable good access to the supply chain and client markets.
The majority of office stock dates from the 1960’s and 1970’s when the town experienced
rapid office development to accommodate increased demand from the public sector and
demand for back office functions. The level of stock rivals that of major regional centres in the
North of England such as Newcastle and Manchester. Croydon is however within close
proximity to central London - a major international office centre attracting companies on a
global level, which continues to draw the majority of occupier attention in the South East
region. Croydon is very much a secondary office location in this respect, containing a large
amount of cheaper, lower quality, office space.
Approximately a third of all employment within the town is provided by the public sector. In
particular, The Home Office occupies a significant amount of floor space and is the sole
occupier of some of the largest buildings in the town including Apollo and Lunar House and
Metro Point. Private companies located within the town including the headquarters of Nestle
UK, Mott MacDonald and Direct Line, positioning it as a centre for insurance services and
general ‘back office’ operations of the financial sector.
The town is to some extent a victim of pre-conceptions held by potential occupiers due largely
to the age of the office stock and its exterior aesthetics. Social problems such as crime or the
fear of crime can also contribute to negative pre-conceptions which dissuade occupiers from
considering the town.
Requirements from occupiers locating in the area tend to follow set radial patterns which may
be viewed as segments extending outwards from central London. Within these segments,
Croydon would fall under the south central category with another major segment being the
south west London market including Wimbledon. It is rare for a larger company to make an
east-west move, for example, from Bromley to Croydon or from Croydon to Wimbledon and
vice-versa. The view of local property market agents is that demand for office floorspace is
stronger from occupiers already established in the CMC than from inward investment (moves
by businesses from central London to Croydon to LB Croydon are said to be relatively
uncommon).
7.3 CMC Office Market and Comparator Centres
LB Croydon has strong radial and orbital linkages within South London. Comparator centres
within this boundary are considered to be:
• Inner London: London Bridge/Waterloo/the South Bank known as the SE1 market,
plus town centres in Wandsworth, Lewisham and Lambeth
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 92
49353249
• Outer London / Surrey: Bromley Town (Bromley), Wimbledon (Merton), Redhill and
Reigate (Surrey)
The market can therefore be broadly described as having the following boundaries:
• SE1 to the North
• Redhill and Reigate within the Borough of Reigate and Banstead to the south
• Bromley to the East, and
• Wimbledon to the West.
The CMC office property market is geographically defined by centres that compete for medium
to large-scale occupiers (450sqm upwards)
Total Stock
According to Stiles Harold Williams research, there is approximately 715,000 sqm 28
of office
space in the CMC area is the largest office market in terms of floor space in the southern outer
London boroughs. Whilst the SE1 area has a significantly greater level of stock at 1.74 million
sqm this area comprises a number of centrally located and densely populated centres such as
Waterloo and London Bridge. Apart from the SE1 area, the largest competing office centre is
Redhill and Reigate (which is itself comprised of two separate towns) and provides
approximately 315,000 sqm of space – c.45% of the total stock in Croydon. Croydon is
therefore the most significant office centre in the South London area.
The Wimbledon office market is reported as being circa 100,000 sqm whilst Sutton is the
smallest at 71,000 sqm. The choice and availability of office buildings in Croydon is therefore
significantly higher than that of local competing centres.
The comparator centres of Wimbledon and SE1 have a higher proportion of newly built stock.
As previously mentioned, Croydon has suffered from a lack of speculatively built office space.
It has the highest proportion of 1960’s/1970’s buildings of all local office centres. Significant
recent developments in comparator Centres include the Kingsgate scheme in Redhill, and
Chorus in Wimbledon. One of the main weaknesses of the CMC market is that, in recent
years, it has been unable to provide any speculatively constructed new office stock.
Trends in Level of Stock
Croydon CMC became established as a regional office centre during the 1960’s and 1970’s
when there was large scale office development. Driven by accessibility and land values/ cost
saving, the growth of the tertiary sector, and suburban growth, the CMC become popular as a
‘back office’ location.
There has been little large scale development activity since the 1980’s, largely due to rental
levels limiting the viability of new development and there being more value in retaining and
refurbishing existing buildings rather than build new. By comparison, other centres in the
SLFPMA have attracted new development recently. Reigate and Redhill has developed
substantially in the 1980’s due to the motorway link at Junction 8 of the M25 (Reigate Hill).
28 This figure is different to the VOA data due to buildings being refurbished and therefore not included in the rating list
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 93
49353249
Wimbledon has also seen more recent development, partly a factor of the smaller, ‘tighter’
market (less available sites), which has lead to a pent up demand for new development.
Figure 7.2: Total Stock in Comparator Centres within the SLFPMA
200,000
71,000
448,945315,000
102,200
715,000
1,737,304
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
Croydon Bromley Sutton Wimbledon South Bank Redhill /
Reigate
Wandsworth
Sq.
m.
Source: Stiles Harold Williams/ Farebrother Research/ Atkins/ Focus/ EGi
Vacancy Rates
The vacancy rate within the CMC office market has, on average, been below 10% for most of
the last ten years. Vacancy has increased recently: since 2008 the current level of vacancy
has been approximately 12%, comparable to levels experienced after the early 1990’s
recession. One of the main factors in the increase in availability is Delta Point, Wellesley Road
coming to the market comprising 23,225 sqm. Due to its size, the CMC office market is less
susceptible to large fluctuations in vacancy. By contrast Sutton has a reported vacancy rate of
circa 30%, the proposed conversions of some large scale offices to alternative uses may
greatly affect this figure. Equally, new additions to smaller markets, such as the 4,128 sqm
Kingsgate development in Redhill will distort figures.
Generally, the vacancy rate amongst the major comparative centres within the SLFPMA is
around 10%. The most efficient market is South Bank which has a reported vacancy rate of
approximately 6%.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 94
49353249
Figure 7.3: Vacancy Rates within Comparator Centres in the SLFPMA
12.0
30.0
8.0
6.0
11.0
7.5
9.0
-
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Croydon Bromley Sutton Wimbledon South Bank Redhill / Reigate Wandsworth
Vacan
cy P
erc
enta
ge
Source: Stiles Harold Williams / Farebrother Research/ Atkins/ Focus/ EGi
Prime Rents
Croydon currently has one of the lowest prime rents of the major office centres within the
SLFPMA. The main reason for this is the age and supply of stock. Whilst newly built
developments in Wimbledon, for example, have helped to push rents up towards £300 per
sqm, the second hand refurbished stock which dominates the CMC office market has not held
its value during the economic downturn.
Prime rents in Croydon peaked during the early 1990s at the peak of the previous property
cycle. At the time, small scale newly built developments such as Christopher Wren Yard were
able to achieve rental values of £25 per sqm. From this historic high, prime rents
subsequently fell due, primarily, to wide scale economic contraction. These rents then grew
gradually throughout the next ten to fifteen years though to some extent affected by shorter
term influences such as the dotcom bubble. At the peak of the property cycle in 2007, prime
rents had just about returned to their early 1990s peak. Prime rents at the time where £237
per sqm. The majority of these lettings were of refurbished space which dominated the market
at the time and continues to do so.
There is a broad correlation between vacancy rates and prime rents whereby the two towns
with the highest vacancy rates (Croydon and Sutton) also have the lowest prime rents. The
prime rental level of £430 per sqm seen in SE1 reflects the areas central and more prestigious
location, and the high proportion of newly developed high quality stock in relation to total
stock.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 95
49353249
In the CMC office market, there have been fewer enquiries since the onset of the economic
downturn, while at the same time, the amount of available space has increased. As much of
the office stock offers a similar standard of accommodation, landlords are becoming more
competitive on price in order to differentiate their building. The trend towards lower prime rents
is one that we would expect to see continue in the short to medium term (2-3 years) as office
availability is set to increase.
Figure 7.4: Prime Rents within Comparator Centres in the SLFPMA
215
236
188
296
430
247
290
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Croydon Bromley Sutton Wimbledon South Bank Redhill / Reigate Wandsworth
£ /
Sqm
Source: Stiles Harold Williams / Farebrother Research/ Atkins/ Focus/ EGi
Overall, Croydon has the largest office market of the outer London comparator centres within
the SLFPMA. The recent increase in vacancy rates coupled with lack of new stock has had a
depressive effect on prime rents which now stand at £215 per sqm. In contrast, comparative
centres with more restricted supply such as Wimbledon have maintained higher rents. This is
significant because it demonstrates the restriction in supply and the better quality of office
accommodation in this town. Geographically, Croydon has many of the same attributes as
Wimbledon and benefits from greater public transport accessibility. The main differences
between the two towns are that Wimbledon has a more restricted supply of sites for office
buildings and suffers from less of the negative pre conceptions that occupiers can have
towards Croydon.
The key issue of prime rents is that they represent the relationship between demand and
supply in an office market. When appraising a development, developers will look to these
figures to gauge the likely profitability of a project. Aside from land costs, many of the costs
associated with the development will be similar in each of the comparator locations (with the
exception of SE1). As such, assuming sites can be acquired at an acceptable price, those
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 96
49353249
locations that are able to demonstrate higher prime rents will be more attractive to developers.
Put simply, the higher the prime rents, the greater the profit for the developer is likely to be.
For this reason, prime rents should not be considered as nominal figures but rather as a signal
to potential investors that there is good demand in the town.
7.4 CMC Demand Characteristics
Take Up
Trends regarding take up (which represents demand for office space) across the SLFPMA
shows a marked reduction since the onset of the economic downturn. Croydon itself shows
take up of just under 15,000 sqm for 2009, which is below the annual average of
approximately 23,000 sqm seen over the last ten years or so. There have been no large scale
lettings of over 3,000 sqm within the CMC office market in the last two years. The most
notable lettings were; Mitsubishi Electric taking 1,212 sqm at Stephenson House and Mott
MacDonald taking the whole of Phoenix House at 2,600 sqm.
Figure 7.5: Take up within the major comparator centres of the SLFPMA during 2009
14,864
1,858
45,594
2,415
15,72614,000
3,716
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
Croydon Bromley Sutton Wimbledon South Bank Redhill /
Reigate
Wandsworth
Sq.
m.
Source: Stiles Harold Williams / Farebrother Research/ Atkins/ Focus/ EGi
The take up figures for Wimbledon were dominated by three large lettings of newly developed
office space including; Sutton and Merton PCT who took 3,900 sqm at Chorus, Capsticks LLP
who took 4,180 sqm at St Georges House and Orbis who took 3,437 sqm at Wimbledon
Bridge House. This level of take up is unusual for the town and resulted from the completion of
speculatively built space. Usually the level of take up for Wimbledon is similar to that of
smaller comparative centres such as Sutton or Bromley. As has been previously considered,
the Wimbledon office market is attractive to occupiers because it benefits from modern stock
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 97
49353249
and is considered to be a generally more attractive town within which to locate. This means
that demand from occupiers is relatively strong; however the level of take up is more strongly
influenced by the supply of new buildings. Recent developments (albeit in more favourable
economic conditions) have demonstrated that when office space is built speculatively it tends
to attract occupiers.
In SE1, the number of lettings was far higher due to the size of the market. The average size
of transactions was greater, with numerous lettings of over 900 sqm occurring each quarter.
The largest letting was to Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation trust who took 5,384 sqm at
75 York Road. Other significant lettings included 2,834 sqm to Markit Information Services Ltd
at the Cottons Centre and 2,353 sqm to Red Bull at More London.
Take up within the CMC area for 2009 was relatively poor – a reflection of wider economic
issues. With the exception of Wimbledon and SE1, take up in the other comparator centres
was similarly below average. The main implication of this is that there will be an increased
supply of office space which, in a relatively homogonous market place will inevitably lead to a
decrease in rental levels. This, in turn, will make the town less attractive to potential
developers and investors as it signals that there is not sufficient demand within the town to
support a profitable new development. Undoubtedly, the level of take up will increase in the
future with a corresponding increase in rents. However, in the absence of such growth in the
short term, should the town wish to attract inward investment, it must make developments with
lower rental values more viable. This could be done by reducing the obstacles for
development, one of the most significant of which is the cost of obtaining initial planning
consent. If developers are able to partake in a less protracted planning process, it may be able
to secure an advantage over comparative centres where rents are higher.
Take Up In the CMC Office Market Since 1998
Office take-up in the CMC office market can fluctuate greatly from quarter to quarter. This is
due to larger single lettings which have the capacity to skew the figures. The trend is for a
reduction in take-up, which peaked during 2000. Since the onset of the economic downturn,
take-up has levelled out, and no longer produces the peaks experienced in the early 2000’s.
This is due to a reduction in large scale lettings, with fewer firms feeling confident enough to
incur the costs associated with moving. The majority of recent lettings have been as a result of
lease expiries or break clauses, where companies take the opportunity to upgrade to a better
building on competitive terms.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 98
49353249
Figure 7.6: Quarterly take up in the CMC office market since 1998
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
sqm
Source: Stiles Harold Williams
Take Up by Sector
Recent take up of office stock in Croydon is shown in Table 7.1. The proportions mirror the
size of sector, by employment (refer back to Table 4.7).
Table 7.1: Take Up by General Sector, 2006-2010
Sector Percentage of Take Up
Public Administration 30%
Finance/ Professional 22%
Engineering and Construction 20%
Training, employment and education 13%
Transport 8%
IT 7%
Source: Stiles Harold Williams
Take Up by Quality
In general terms, in recent years the majority of take up has been in the more modern
completed developments and better quality existing accommodation. Take up, for example, in
the 1960’s and 70’s unrefurbished buildings has been low with the modern office occupier
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 99
49353249
looking for better quality buildings for reasons such as staff retention and to comply with
legislation, such as the Disability Discrimination Act.
Table 7.2: Take Up by Quality, since 2007
Year Older Stock
1960’s/70’s
Unrefurbished
Older Stock
1960’s/70’s
Refurbished
Newer stock
1980’s/90’s/00’s
Unrefurbished and refurbished
2009 12% 62% 26%
2008 8% 84% 8%
2007 5% 73% 22%
Source: Stiles Harold Williams Research
The above figures demonstrate that in recent years refurbished stock has been the most
successful in securing new lettings. This is due to the fact that there has been very little new
development and therefore if occupiers wish to have a modern standard of accommodation
they are only able to find it within refurbished buildings. As such, the market for new build
developments is untested in recent times due to the lack of speculatively built stock. Although
there are a limited number of pre-let opportunities in the market, these have tended to fair less
well amongst local occupiers who generally work to shorter timescales when moving (6 to 12
months).
The success of refurbished buildings is driven by the fundamental characteristics of initial
structure. Initially, is the location right? Ideally occupiers would like to be within close proximity
of East Croydon station with a pleasant and secure route to their office. Recently, the
extension of the East London line has attracted occupier’s attention towards West Croydon
station and this has benefitted office buildings in the main office core between Wellesley Road
and Dingwall Road. Secondly, the structure of the building must be able to accommodate
modern working practices. Larger scale occupiers prefer large open floor plates with minimal
interruptions by columns. This allows them to occupy fewer floors and also allows the work
space to be adapted as a company structure practices evolve. Furthermore, the height
between structural floor slabs should be sufficient enough to accommodate both suspended
ceiling and raised floor. The latter increases the flexibility of the work space as desks will not
necessarily have to be bound to the position of perimeter trunking against interior elevations
and columns. Refurbished buildings that do not have these characteristics have tended to be
less successful. The most notable recent refurbishments include No. 1 Croydon (formerly NLA
Tower), Knollys and Stephenson House on Cherry Orchard Road, 69 Park Lane and Sunley
House on Bedford Park Road. The common characteristics between each of these buildings is
that they have one or more of the following characteristics; a central location, good sized open
floor plates, raised floors and suspended ceilings, modern exterior aesthetics.
When embarking on a project, developers will usually have conducted extensive market
research with advice from agents and other advisers within the local property market. Should a
newly built office development be proposed it will usually be because it offers the greatest
likelihood of profitability. Given that refurbishments are generally cheaper to undertake there
should be a sound reason why a developer is proposing otherwise. For example, a
refurbishment may not be marketable as it does not have the characteristics as considered
above, the costs of the refurbishment are prohibitively high. One of the main drawbacks of
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 100
49353249
refurbishment is that it confines a developer to an existing structure and does not allow the
density of a site to be increased by, for example, creating a taller building or a building with
more efficient floor plates. This acts as a disincentive to purchase the site as it closes one
potential avenue of value maximisation.
7.5 CMC Supply Characteristics
Availability
Major properties and sites that became available in the past few years in the SLFPMA centres
include the following;
Croydon: Trafalgar House, Bedford Park – a self contained building comprising 4,460 sqm
approx which was completed in 2006/07 for the Land Registry. The building was originally built
as their headquarters for their own occupation. Prior to this, the last office development
completed was Metro Point in Sydenham Road comprising 3,716 sqm which was built
speculatively and let on completion in 2002 to The Home Office.
Redhill and Reigate: Recent developments include Kingsgate in Redhill comprising 4,107
sqm a new landmark office building which completed in 2008 to a Grade A specification. In
Reigate, London Court, a self contained building of 3,298 sqm was completed in the autumn of
2009 to a Grade A specification. The property is situated on London Road which is the prime
office location in Reigate and benefits from an excellent parking ratio of 70 spaces.
Wimbledon: New office buildings have been generally well received in the market. Notably,
Wimbledon Gate, comprising 5,465 sqm, was completed in 2005 and let shortly afterwards to
Domestic and General, a local company who relocated from elsewhere within the town. The
property was a self contained office building of 5,465 sqm. More recently, Chorus, a scheme
of 3,948 sqm was completed in 2009 and let to the Sutton and Merton Primary Care Trust for
their own occupation.
As the examples above demonstrate, in recent years where speculative development has
been undertaken in Croydon, it has been wholly let to the public sector. This means that there
has not been a significant letting of a newly constructed building to a private sector tenant in
Croydon for a least a decade. It is therefore unsurprising that no new build large scale office
developments were constructed during the last upturn as the market is so untested. It has not
yet been demonstrated that Croydon has the ability to attract a significant amount of demand
from private sector occupiers of other comparator centres. The implications of this are that
developers must assume that demand for new development is confined to the CMC market
and the occupiers located therein. This clearly inhibits the marketability of development sites.
However, should a new office development be successful in securing such an occupier,
confidence in the CMC market would increase and with it the likelihood of developers
speculatively constructing schemes.
Development Pipeline
In the majority of SLFPMA centres there are no significant development completions about to
happen or under construction. The major exception to this is SE1 where there is currently
10,219 sqm of offices under construction. The large majority of the speculative space will
come from the Shard where 31,215 sqm of office space is scheduled to complete in 2012.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 101
49353249
This is a mixed use tower and the other five schemes with speculative office space are also
mixed use buildings.
In Croydon, there are a number of speculative schemes proposed and currently being
marketed on a pre-let basis. These include:
• Proposals for Ruskin Square (West of East Croydon CMC 2b) suggest a mixed use
scheme comprising an office element of 10,219 sqm in four separate buildings. The
developer is Stanhope/ Schroders
• At Chroma, 100 George Street (north east corner of CMC 4a), Terrace Hill have
planning consent for a new office development of 23,969 sqm - a stand alone scheme
opposite East Croydon station
• At 13-16 Dingwall Road (vacant and derelict land CMC 10a), there is planning consent
for a new office development of 23,225 sqm. However, the developer has recently
gone into receivership and LPA receivers are now appointed
• In Cherry Orchard Road (CMC 2a), developer Menta is proposing a comprehensive
redevelopment. A mixed use scheme comprising 1,000 apartments and 37,160 sqm of
offices, shops and bars was previously proposed. A planning application was
submitted in autumn 2008 but was subsequently withdrawn as it was understood to be
unlikely to be successful. There was a lot of opposition to the scale of the proposed
scheme from local residents
• At 28-30 Addiscombe Grove (south east area of the CMC boundary – not surveyed),
developer Berwick Hill has planning consent for a new office development of 3,741
sqm arranged on ground and six upper floors. This is a stand alone building situated
close to East Croydon station.
In total, these five developments could provide around 61,154 sqm and 98,314 sqm of office
floorspace.
This build up of latent supply is due to the dearth of new development before the two previous
peaks in the property cycle in the late 1980’s and mid 2000’s. In the current market, new
development will only take place with a pre-let to a good quality ‘blue chip’ company. These
are difficult to secure, firstly because occupiers are generally not expansionary at present, but
also because of delayed supply and the unwillingness to commit to a building that has not yet
been produced. As a result, even if a developer were to secure one or two average sized pre-
lets, the majority of a 20,000 sqm building would still need to be constructed speculatively.
There is a general consensus amongst developers that new office developments will need to
achieve rental values of circa £300 per sqm to become viable. These figures can increase for
larger schemes such as the Croydon East Croydon masterplan where infrastructure provision
increases construction costs.
As mentioned, one of the main weaknesses of the CMC office market is the lack of modern
stock and negative preconceptions amongst occupiers. Areas of the town can appear to be
neglected, especially the Ruskin Square and Chroma sites which are directly adjacent to East
Croydon station and are the first thing that many visitors see. In addition the area around St.
George’s Walk and the former Park Place scheme suffers from a number of vacant retail units
and office suites. The provision of effective master plans could have the potential to improve
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 102
49353249
the image of the CMC office market. The key feature of any new plan is that it must be seen to
be realistic and deliverable. There would therefore need to be an important balance between
improving the built environment and ensuring that the plan is economically viable.
We believe there will be good demand for new office space on key sites such as the East
Croydon masterplan when the occupier market has improved and rental levels have increased
sufficiently to justify new development (circa £300 per sqm). The timescale for this happening
is unclear but we forecast this happening within the next 3 to 5 years. During this time period,
LB Croydon could take an active role in helping to prepare sites for development to attract
interest from developers – potentially this could include site clearance and land remediation, if
required; undertake a positive branding exercise and actively market the CMC as a place for
doing business.
Similarly we believe the Chroma site at 100 George Street, is a prime location for offices in the
CMC. Such sites could become highly marketable particularly if combined with improvements
to the public realm. The best example of such a proposal is the new pedestrian entrance to
East Corydon station via the Ruskin Square site. If completed successfully, this could greatly
influence people’s perception of the town as visitors travelling via East Croydon would
immediately encounter a modern and regenerated area.
Whilst such sites may be marketable, there are supply site factors which currently inhibit the
potential to deliver the schemes. The most pertinent issue is that of bank finance, with the
majority of developers being unable to fully finance a speculative office development,
particularly one as large scale as the Ruskin Square site. For as long as financial institutions
are unwilling to forward fund speculative development, the deliverability of key redevelopment
sites will remain in doubt. This is not a problem that is confined to the CMC market but is one
that may become more pressing should other markets begin to recover at a greater pace. The
first step will be an office development that is able to demonstrably attract a large private
sector occupier, either through a pre-let or to a speculatively developed scheme. The Council
can play a role in helping to reduce barriers to development where possible and improve the
attractiveness of the CMC to potential occupiers such as improvements to the public realm, a
reduction in perceived social issues and general promotion of the town as a business centre.
We anticipate the first new office scheme could be 28-30 Addiscombe Grove, due to its
smaller size and the lack of dependency on a major pre-let to kick start the scheme, increasing
its viability.
7.6 CMC Property Market Outlook
A general trend amongst office occupiers is for consolidation of space. Whereas over the last
ten to twenty years large corporate occupiers would take offices in smaller local centres, this is
now changing, with occupiers preferring larger, less fragmented space in regional centres.
This is particularly true with corporate occupiers, partly so that large numbers of staff are able
to commute via public transport. The CMC office market may therefore be able to draw such
occupiers from nearby local centres such as Purley or Caterham. However on the strength of
transport links alone, this trend will be more difficult to repeat from the main competing office
centres of Wimbledon, Reigate and Redhill and SE1 until higher quality office stock is
provided.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 103
49353249
The availability of stock in Croydon means that it is well positioned to accommodate firms
looking to consolidate space. Floor plates in excess of 900 sqm are available, and this size
space allows occupiers to minimise the number of floors that their operation is split over.
At the same time, there is also an increase in demand, amongst corporate occupiers for more
modern and sustainable buildings. Often, the core policies of large companies will prohibit
them from occupying a certain type of building. They will generally seek buildings that are
accessible, inclusive and sustainable while also providing the right corporate image. More
often than not, new office buildings are best positioned to offer each of these variables.
Croydon has a distinct lack of new build offices with the majority of modern space being
refurbished within 60’s, 70’s and 80’s buildings. This can be seen as one of the major
weaknesses of the town as without such accommodation, corporate occupiers will not
consider the CMC market even for ‘back office’ or secondary operations.
Croydon traditionally has more economical rents and therefore could be expected to be a net
beneficiary of the economic downturn as companies look to reduce costs, of which rent is a
major element. However, the large cuts in public sector spending and employment announced
by the new coalition in the emergency budget of June 22nd
2010 could impact on the Croydon
occupier market of which the public sector constitutes a significant proportion. Potentially,
government spending cuts could result in an increase in office availability and have a
depressive affect on rents. The reliance on the public sector can therefore be seen as a weak
of the CMC.
One of the main strengths of the CMC office market is its capacity to accommodate new
development. Having produced very few new office buildings before the peak of the last
property cycle, the town now has numerous sites available for new development. This
contrasts with the competing centres of Wimbledon and Redhill / Reigate, which were able to
promote development.
7.7 CMC Market Conclusions
The CMC holds the largest area of office floorspace in the south London area, outside of SE1.
It benefits from excellent public transport links and provides a wide selection of office
accommodation of varying sizes. It is characterised by large scale public sector occupation,
along with financial and engineering/construction companies from the private sector and is
generally aged, with very little recent development. The town suffers from negative
preconceptions amongst occupiers as a result. The town has seen prime rents to fall due to
the economic downturn, which began in quarter two of 2008. This trend is expected to
continue as similar quality second hand and refurbished space enters the market. In order to
draw occupiers from competing centres, the CMC Office market will need to improve the
quality of the built environment. This is likely to entail significant speculative development in
the hope of achieving rents of circa £300 per sqm. In the absence of past evidence of such
rents, developers are likely to consider the financial risk unacceptable at present.
Looking forward, the main strength of the CMC office market in relation to comparator centres
within the SLFPMA is that it has the capacity to deliver new developments with rents that
could be significantly lower than comparable buildings in central London. The combination of
excellent public transport infrastructure with significant cleared sites with the benefit of
planning permission for office and mixed use development is something which is not found
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 104
49353249
frequently if at all in the comparator centres. However, in recent times the town has not been
successful in realising proposed developments and has somewhat stagnated in terms of the
built environment generally. Over the past twenty years or so, various master plans have been
proposed none of which have had the affect of stimulating new development and/or
improvements to the public realm.
We consider the stimulation of new build office developments to be vital to the ability of the
CMC market to capture a greater proportion of employment growth in the future. Should the
town continue to produce largely refurbished office stock, we would anticipate that patterns of
take up and prime rents will very much repeat the pattern seen between the previous peaks of
the economic cycle between the early 1990’s and late 2000’s. Rents will increase marginally
as space is gradually taken up but, there will be no dramatic increases in prime rents that new
build developments have the ability to deliver. Furthermore, the low number of buildings that
have the right characteristics for successful refurbishment (as previously mentioned good
location, suitable external aesthetics, large unbroken floor plates and floor to ceiling heights)
will mean that occupiers will become increasingly unable to secure suitable accommodation.
There is therefore a danger that without new development, not only will the town fail to attract
a greater proportion of employment growth, but may lose occupiers to those centres that are
able to supply the right type of office stock. While there is no doubt that refurbishments can be
successful, the likelihood of success is highly site specific. We would therefore suggest an
over reliance on refurbishing the existing stock would have the affect of minimising the
potential for capturing employment growth in the future.
7.8 Local Office, Industry and Warehousing Market Overview
This section looks at the local office (B1a), industrial market (B1b/c and B2) and warehousing
(B8) outside the CMC boundary.
The employment land market outside the CMC provides accommodation for smaller scale
businesses and local enterprises. The two main types of occupier that are likely to be located
in the local market are new start up businesses with employees from within the borough, and
more established businesses that rely on the local population for their custom. An example of
the latter would be firms of solicitors or accountancy firms. Such occupiers are highly
influenced by the location (residence) of staff and directors. The decision to be based in the
local office property market is usually due to the convenience of avoiding long commuting
distances. Such businesses may have grown from the home or local serviced office centres
and may provide services at a local level or make use of the internet to broaden the area
covered geographically by the company.
Businesses which take up space in local office markets or factory or warehousing space
provided in LB Croydon will have a smaller geography of search when looking for premises.
The local office and industrial market in LB Croydon share similar demand characteristics to
surrounding London and Surrey boroughs. As such the area of search can be referred to as
the Local Property Market Area (LPMA), which geographically covers:
• Croydon, Bromley, Sutton, Merton (Outer London); and
• Reigate and Banstead (Surrey).
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 105
49353249
7.9 Local Office Market Demand and Supply Characteristics
VOA data records 130,000 sqm of office stock outside the CMC. The local office market is
dominated by small to medium sized stand alone office buildings of up to 2,000 sqm and
ancillary offices attached to other commercial uses, such as above retail or as part of an
industrial unit. The defining characteristics of this accommodation are that premises are much
smaller than that found in the CMC, rents can be significantly lower and lease terms are
generally more flexible. Accommodation is likely to be owned by smaller private investors who
are generally willing to provide flexible occupancy terms. This flexibility is vital for smaller
businesses, especially new start-ups that may be unsure of committing to a lease of at least
five years.
Serviced office providers are important contributors to the office stock in the LB Croydon
market. While such operations are located within the CMC, a number are located within the
local property market. These centres provide a range of small scale office space (from offices
small enough for one person) and provide accommodation for those looking to establish their
first business premises. Often the rental price will include additional services such as
receptionist, office furniture, telephones and internet etc and business are able to occupy on a
monthly basis. These centres provide an environment where small businesses can benefit
from agglomeration such as networking. Examples of serviced office centres include Lombard
House, operated by Workspace Group on Purley Way, and Croydon House nearby on Peall
Road.
The local office market is an important source of employment for the local population.
Whereas the larger companies that occupy the CMC and other competing centres will require
a certain level of skill from their employees, the local office market provides an environment in
which clerical and administrative staff can find employment close to home.
Prime rents ranges from around £100 to £160 per sqm and many of these areas identified
provide very limited office accommodation with the exception of Purley, Coulsdon and
Thornton Heath town centres.
Take up has been negligible in recent years and there have been no new development
completions for a number of years in any of these locations. Low demand for office space in
many district and town centre locations has meant that some office space has been lost to
other uses.. In Norbury, where there are now only a few significant office buildings available,
there has been three or more major office buildings converted to residential or self storage
uses within the last ten to fifteen years. In Purley town centre and Coulsdon town centre, there
has been no new office development in these locations for some considerable time and
demand is very localised. We have seen a number of companies relocating from these areas
into more established areas such as the CMC or M25 towns to the south such as Redhill and
Reigate.
7.10 Local Office Market Outlook
In terms of the outlook over the planning period, we believe the LPMA will continue to provide
employment sites for the local office market although we suspect there is unlikely to be rapid
growth in demand and believe that occupiers may look to relocate to the more established
business locations, such as the CMC.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 106
49353249
It is expected that demand will remain relatively static with potential for the continued trend of
loss of commercial to other uses, such as residential, in the medium term up to 2031.
7.11 Local Industrial and Warehousing Market
Overview
The Croydon industrial and warehousing market principally competes with the following
regional areas within the LPMA, which include:
• Sutton – principally centred on the Kimpton Industrial area
• Redhill and Reigate
• Bromley;
• London Borough of Merton.
However, all of these areas have their own specific supply and demand factors and, whilst
there has been some cross movement between areas, for historic reasons businesses have
tended not to move across from one area to another.
With the decline of manufacturing in the UK, the majority of occupiers in the local market tend
to be warehousing (B8) orientated although we have seen a number of telecoms companies
taking accommodation in the last ten years for switch centres, self storage operators and more
recently occupiers dealing with distribution for internet sales operations.
The local industrial and warehousing market includes the following centres within the LB
Croydon:
• Purley Way North
• Purley Way South
• Gloucester Road
• Selsdon Road
• Vulcan Way
• Union Road
• Ullswater Crescent
• Thornton Road, and
• Bensham Grove.
These specific areas lie within the LB Croydon however, the industrial and warehousing
market overlaps with LB Sutton at Purley South area located off Stafford Road and between
Beddington Lane and Beddington Farm Road. Much of this warehousing incorporated in the
London Borough of Sutton has a Croydon postal address and is part of the cross-borough
Purley Way SIL, as defined in the London Plan.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 107
49353249
Table 7.3: Industrial Stock Levels Across the LPMA
Area Stock sqm
Croydon 836,000
Redhill and Reigate 336,000
Sutton (excluding Beddington Lane) 426,000
Bromley 506,000
London Borough of Merton 736,000
Source: URS/DTZ and Stiles Harold Williams
Supply and Demand Characteristics
In total there is 1.3 million sqm of industry and warehousing stock within the LPMA, of which
836,000 sqm lies within LB Croydon. Age and condition of stock varies. Stock includes 1950’s
and 60’s light factory accommodation, the majority of which has now been replaced by more
modern late 1970’s early 80’s space with 10% ancillary office accommodation and good
accessibility.
There has been a considerable amount of new development in the Purley Way South and
Purley Way North areas although only one other new development in the other areas, in the
past 10 years.
The most recent developments being completed in the area include Phase I Spitfire Business
Park located in the Purley South area and ZK Park, Commerce Trade Park and Commerce
Park located in the Purley Way North area. These developments have offered a mix of units,
in terms of size, from 185 sqm to 2,800 sqm on both leasehold and freehold terms.
The warehouse and logistics market in Croydon is generally seen as one of the larger markets
in the South East. The strength of the Croydon market is the broad range of accommodation
offered and the variety of premises to accommodate different user types. Locally, however,
there is some divergence in quality of stock and age of buildings. Vulcan Way in New
Addington is nearly all 1960’s accommodation and has seen little new build or improvements
to quality. Union Road and Bensham Grove also offer older style manufacturing areas which
are considered to be less suitable for today’s modern logistics operators due to relatively poor
access (both also located in residential areas).
Key locations by level of stock are set out in the following table.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 108
49353249
Table 7.4: LB Croydon Industrial and Warehousing Locations
Location Total Premises (sqm)
Purley Way North 201,518
Purley Way South 152,816
Gloucester Road 44,707
Selsdon Road 12,626
Vulcan Way 53,211
Union Road 18,065
Marlpit Lane 62,630
Thornton Road 27,156
Outside of employment areas (subject to Policy EM5) 263,361
Total 836,090
Source. LB Croydon Monitoring Data 2007/2008
In term of competition from other markets, it is quite insular in that it does not attract occupiers
from outside the M25 and has seen a loss of firms to Redhill/Reigate. Such firms have
included Winterbotham Darby, Nera and Wika Instruments distribution (telecommunications
and light manufacturing companies). The loss has been driven by occupier’s tenure and
accommodation requirements.
Vacancy Rates
With the downturn in the economic climate the industrial premises vacancy rate has increased
from approximately 5% in 2007 to the current level of 6.4% (peaked at approximately 11% in
early 2009). The increase in vacancy has been driven by business failure, the consolidation by
larger national companies into existing accommodation, and the lack of new developments to
meet the demands of modern occupiers.
Prime Rents
Table 7.5 below shows comparative industrial stock, prime rents and vacancy levels across
the LPMA.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 109
49353249
Table 7.5: Prime Rents in Comparator Centres
Location Prime Rents £/ sqm Vacancy Rate
Croydon £86.11 6.4%
Redhill and Reigate £91.50 6.7%
Sutton (excluding Beddington Lane) £86.11 7.2%
Bromley £83.42 3.4%
London Borough of Merton £102.26 6.0%
Source: Stiles Harold Williams
Figure 7.7 shows that the 2009 rental values are the lowest values achieved since 2000. This
has implications for attracting new development.
Figure 7.7: Prime rents in Croydon
83.42
86.11
96.88
102.26102.26
91.49
88.8
91.4991.49
96.88
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Re
nt £
/ s
qm
(pe
r a
nn
um
)
Source: Stiles Harold Williams
Falling rental values are one reason for why there have been no new speculative
developments of industrial/ warehousing stock in the last three or four years, within the LB
Croydon. The last scheme to complete was Spitfire Business Park, 1 Hawker Road completing
in 2006. The only scheme currently available offering new accommodation for logistics and
industry is the IO Centre (Croydon Road) although this lies within the London Borough of
Sutton. More recently a number of institutional landlords have refurbished older stock (30
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 110
49353249
years old). Refurbishment has included units with concertina loading doors rather than
electronically operated roller shutter doors; extension to office space, and other enhancements
such as damage cladding, re-guttering and roofing.
In terms of demand, the market is very much driven by access to the strategic road network.
In the last fifteen years, floorspace has been taken by telecommunications operators for use
as ‘switching centres’. More latterly, we have seen an uptake in internet sales companies
occupying distribution warehouses driven by the close proximity of residential property to the
Purley Way South and Purley Way North industrial areas. This has included Tesco’s taking
16,700 sqm at Factory Lane for home delivery operations through to smaller retailers
operating internet sales operations. A number of self storage occupiers have taken space
along the A23 over the last 10 years driven by the same reasons.
Table 7.6 below shows the take up of industrial/ warehousing space in the Croydon market
since 2000.
Table 7.6: Take up of industrial/ warehouse space in Croydon
Year Take Up (sqm) Indexed on yr 2000
2000 37,161 100
2001 44,128 119
2002 59,935 161
2003 51,449 138
2004 45,032 121
2005 77,885 210
2006 34,533 93
2007 37,161 100
2008 42,786 115
2009 35,892 97
Source. Stiles Harold Williams
7.12 Local Industrial Market Outlook
Over the last twelve years, there has been a considerable amount of development of
warehouse and factory accommodation in the Croydon market replacing older stock from the
post war era, which was unsuitable for today’s modern occupier. However there is little land
available along the main arterial roads such as the A23 Purley Way for future development.
Over the last decade there has been continued pressure from residential development. As a
result some industrial/warehousing space has been lost. Approximately 15,000 sqm of
warehouse/logistic space was been lost at New South Quarter (NSQ) on the Purley Way
through a mixed use redevelopment scheme. Stiles Harold Williams believes that space for
articulated vehicle movements and lack of yard and parking facilities at NSQ is unsuitable for
warehousing/logistics accommodation. A such there has been a loss and downgrading of
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 111
49353249
good quality accommodation for B1(c), B2, B8 users. Mixed use developments such as NSQ
must ensure that the needs of all end-users are fully accommodated.
In addition to the pressure from the residential developers, there has been increased pressure
from alternative use classes including religious organisations, medical users and a number of
other uses within the D1 and D2 use classes29
, which in some instances has removed older
style industrial premises from the market place.
Since the early 2000’s areas to the east, around Dartford, have become more attractive to
occupiers, due to access to the Channel Tunnel, Dartford Crossing and links to the national
motorway network. There are potentially sites to the southern end of the LB Croydon that
would perhaps offer an excellent opportunity to re-dress the balance of lost employment
generating land and would offer far better motorway access for occupiers. Some clusters to
the south of the borough have excellent road access to the national motorway network as well
as good rail facilities to central London and south to Gatwick and the South Coast making
them far suitable for today’s modern occupier.
7.13 Local Market Conclusions
There is a strong established industrial warehousing base in LB Croydon. However, we have
seen this market change from an engineering/ manufacturing basis to one of storage and
distribution - a trend that we consider will to continue. Accessibility is a key driver of this trend,
Croydon is ideally situated equidistant between the M25/M23 and central London and has a
large number of local residents within proximity. This is evidenced by Tesco’s Home Delivery
service operating out of 185,000 sq ft in Factory Lane, Croydon serving the South London
region. Demand from internet based retailers seeking warehousing for distribution purposes
has also grown over recent years and is expected to continue to grow. A good mix of
warehouse space will need to be provided without hours of use restrictions as today’s
occupiers require 24 hours 7 days a week operation.
The borough has some former employment areas located in residential areas. Though clusters
in these residential areas do not offer today’s modern occupier the quality and standard of
accommodation that they require and stringent planning rules to retain, they do serve a
function for SMEs, offering smaller premises at lower rental levels and often with more flexible
leasing arrangements.
29 Non-residential institutions, and assembly and leisure, respectively
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 112
49353249
8 CONSULTATIONS WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS
8.1 Introduction
This section reports in aggregate on the key responses of the consultations with stakeholders
charged with the provision of business support e.g. Croydon Economic Development
Company; Croydon College; Croydon Enterprise Loan Fund; Croydon Enterprise as well as a
businesses located in the borough.
8.2 Business Accommodation Demand and Supply
Key responses
• Croydon faces strong competition in attracting new businesses and investors
• Deficiencies exists in the provision of medium to large units, and high quality office
space; and
• There is a greater need to re-development of existing office stock (older and out dated
stock) rather than build new office floorspace.
There was a high level of consensus among respondents that the main areas of deficiency, in
relation to stock, was high quality office floorspace. Presence of high quality office floorspace
would also act as a catalyst to attracting new investors to Croydon and stimulate regeneration.
The majority of consultees spoke of how the appearance of older, out of date office stock
could act as a factor inhibiting the attraction of business to the CMC. Other locations in the
London Fringe area were considered to have better availability of good quality premises,
although it was thought that the supply of good quality premises across the London Fringe was
lacking.
A key employer in Croydon commented that the commercial the land and building frontages
surrounding East Croydon Station were poor and did not project the right impression of a place
to do business.
Notably, one respondent expressed a lack of enthusiasm towards the construction of new,
larger developments, designed to attract large scale companies and headquarters, believing
instead that attention should be given to retaining Croydon-based firms and SMEs. Their
concerns were that large firms would lack involvement with the local economy, although it was
acknowledged that they could bring employment opportunities and contribution towards the
Croydon Business Improvement District (BID) programme.
In terms of SMEs requirements, in spite of the general scarcity of good quality stock, these
businesses generally appear to have little problem in finding premises that are fit for purpose
and there is little outward movement of such businesses from the borough.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 113
49353249
8.3 Labour Force Structure
Key responses
• Education and skill levels are considered to be low and participation and attainment
levels need to rise be in order to attract investment and provide economic stimulus;
and
• Consideration should be given to the further development of practical, industry-
focused skills.
There was a consensus from all stakeholders that the education and skills base in the area
was in need of improvement; however the existing education level of residents are said to
match the lower education and skills base required for occupations by existing employers,
such as retail, call centre and administrative positions. The low skills profile however, is
recognised to limit the economic mobility, contribute to economic inactivity and income
deprivation.
When taking into account the levels of industrial and manufacturing premises in the borough,
consultees felt there is a deficiency in practical skills within the local population that may be
causing businesses to locate elsewhere within the broad M25 industrial market.
There is a belief among some existing businesses and concerned parties that attracting
employers in high growth sectors to the area would produce a knock on effect in improving
education and skill levels in the medium to long term.
One respondent suggested that a lack of information technology expertise was a particular
constraint on attracting more high profile occupiers to the borough, with another key
stakeholder suggesting that a large proportion of residents who do possess higher education
qualifications, tended to commute outside of Croydon to work.
8.4 LB Croydon as a Place to do Business
Key responses
• Highly accessible location; however significant out-commuting
• Good quality environment: good quality green space, attractive to residents and
businesses, a wide range of commercial and residential stock
• Perception of high crime levels in Croydon is a key issue; and
• Need to develop a stronger, more distinctive brand and business offer.
A key feature of the borough and the CMC in particular, is that there are strong linkages to
central London, and therefore other parts of the UK, and its proximity to Gatwick Airport,
providing links internationally. Business organisations highlighted the locational advantage of
Croydon as a key factor in attracting inward investment.
More broadly, LB Croydon, consultees remarked upon that there was adequate provision of
housing stock, retail facilities and a good presence of green open spaces. However, it was
acknowledged that the CMC suffers thorough poorly presented public realm and a lack of
areas of quality amenity space, which are a prominent feature in other office locations such as
Victoria, SE1 area and Canary Wharf.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 114
49353249
One respondent suggested that the CMC lacked a flagship retail occupier and that there was
perhaps an over-presence of budget retailing. However, the breadth of retail offer which the
CMC provides has to be seen in the context of the socio-economic composition of the resident
population.
8.5 Economic Downturn
Key responses
• Empty premises are having a negative impact on perceptions of the area, making it
appear less attractive to prospective investors
• The impact of the recession is most clearly seen by the closure of high street
commercial and retail properties. It is important to manage empty and poorly
maintained premises so they do not impact negatively on the local economic offer
All respondents noted that the number of vacant retail premises had increased, particularly
within district and town centres (less so within the CMC), as a result of the economic
downturn. This was seen to exacerbate negative perceptions of place and as a place to do
business.
Several respondents noted that support for SMEs was important to help the borough emerge
from the economic downturn.
8.6 Priorities for Policy
Key responses
• To attract new investors through the development of commercial property that is
centrally located, of high quality and with high design and construction sustainability
credentials
• To prioritise the refurbishment or modernisation of business accommodation, which is
close to major transport hubs
• Need for a modern business centre to support the growth of SMEs; support for
business start up and retention, and encouraging larger employers to support SMEs in
their growth
• The need to re-configure and enhance the town centre public realm and, in particular,
to address transport and infrastructure issues, e.g. Wellesley Road; and
• Targeted inward investment schemes for area specific development strategies
• A stronger direction and vision: Croydon is ‘fit for it’s current purpose, but needs a
clearer purpose’
All respondents commented that there was a need to attract large employers; however it was
also important to attract, retain and support the growth of SMEs, and that local businesses
should not be overlooked in favour of larger companies.
There was a consensus among stakeholders that LB Croydon should market the CMC as an
office destination, and cited Canary Wharf, Holborn St Giles, and Brindley Place as examples
where this has been successful.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 115
49353249
The completion of proposed developments, in particular key sites such as 100 George Street
(Terrace Hill) and the East Croydon Station masterplan, was crucial to realising a positive
change to the public and commercial realm of the CMC.
In general, stakeholders felt that the CMC would benefit from a complete package of works to
revitalise the public realm – from a reconfiguration of the road network to street-furniture
redesign.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 116
49353249
9 EMPLOYMENT LAND FORECASTING
9.1 Introduction
This section presents the forecast for office and industrial floorspace demand in LB Croydon
over the planned period to 2031. The forecast of the future demand of employment is based
on the methodology suggested in the Employment Land Reviews: Guidance Note (CLG,
2004).
9.2 Forecast Approach
As outlined in the CLG Guidance Note for Employment Land Review (2004) there are various
forecasting approaches that can be used to estimate demand. One approach is to use
employment projections based on macro-economic forecasts. This approach takes account of
wider drivers of change and growth, particularly with regard to the economy of London. The
Greater London Authority (GLA) model presents macro-economic forecasts for based on a
‘triangulation’ process, which incorporates:
• Structural trends evident in the boroughs
• Assumed transport accessibility improvements, and
• The availability of current, and the development of new, business sites and related
premises.
However, applied at a local/borough level the GLA’s model does not usually take account of
the specific circumstances affecting a borough’s local economic development. These factors
could include the availability and nature of specific sites, the range of local regeneration and
job creation initiatives and the specific plans of local businesses in the borough. Our
employment forecast is based on the GLA’s macro-economic forecasting model. However, to
overcome these weaknesses we:
• Consider the property market areas with respect to different employment land use
classes and locations (which recognises that business looks across administrational
boundaries when seeking accommodation)
• Identify, analyse and apply the effects of local / sub-regional factors which are not
reflected in the demand forecasts; and
• Analyse the comparative strengths and opportunities of LB Croydon, and consider
how, under particular scenarios, the borough might capture a greater share of demand
for employment land arising through employment growth.
By this method we ensure that the GLA macro-economic forecasts appropriately incorporate
local factors, which impact on future demand.
9.3 Property Market Areas
At a borough level, changes to the floorspace stock are strongly influenced by single large
events. Decisions by individual employers or developers in specific boroughs can conceal
underlying trends across a property market area (PMA). The same is true for employment
trends based on predictions of macro-economic forecasts for individual boroughs. Businesses
searching for sites and premises to move to will typically look across an area wider than the
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 117
49353249
borough area. We have therefore chosen to forecast the employment land demand for LB
Croydon using data employment growth forecasts based on defined property market areas.
There are two distinct PMAs, which we use in our analysis, as discussed below. The PMAs
were developed in conjunction with local property market agent Stiles Harold Williams.
Croydon Metropolitan Centre Office - Property Market Area
LB Croydon has strong radial and orbital linkages within South London. For the CMC office
market, the suitable area against which a comparison with existing sub-regional forecasts and
benchmarks should be undertaken is the South London Fringe Property Market Area
(SLFPMA). The position of LB Croydon on the fringe of London means that the SLFPMA
includes boroughs from inner London, outer London and Surrey. The SLFPMA comprises:
• Wandsworth, Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham (Inner London)
• Croydon, Bromley, Sutton, Merton (Outer London); and
• Reigate and Banstead (Surrey).
The justification for using data from the SLFPMA is that boroughs in the PMA share similar
market demand characteristics. The property market area is also in part determined by major
lines of transport (access to appropriate markets, workforce, suppliers), and variables which
companies consider when seeking occupancy e.g. rental values. The justification for including
central London boroughs is that the CMC has similar characteristics to these boroughs, such
as the attraction of larger multinational office occupiers.
Local Office and Industrial - Property Market Area
The demand catchment of the local office and industrial land (factories and warehousing)
involves a smaller PMA than the SLFPMA. This reflects the fact that the local office and
industrial market in Croydon shares similar demand characteristics to surrounding London and
Surrey boroughs. In this report the local PMA is called the Local Property Market Area
(LPMA). The LPMA includes the following:
• Croydon, Bromley, Sutton, Merton (Outer London); and
• Reigate and Banstead (Surrey).
The geography of both property market areas are illustrated in Figure 7.1.
9.4 Employment Forecasts
The most recent employment forecasts for London boroughs are produced by GLA Economics
and are contained within ‘London Employment Time Series – Technical Report (March 2010).
This report shows the employment projections for industrial and office jobs to 2031 for each
London borough. The GLA advise boroughs to use these figures for forward planning
purposes. The office employment projections for Reigate and Banstead were taken from the
Reigate and Banstead Economic Market Assessment 2008. The employment forecasts for the
boroughs within the respective property market areas described above are assessed to help
define demand for CMC office and local office and industrial land up to 2031.
CMC Office Employment Forecasts
The actual SLFPMA office employment profile is significantly larger than LB Croydon
(approximately seven times). Employment in offices across the SLFPMA is forecast to
increase by over 39,000 workers between 2011 and 2031 and by just 2,000 workers in LB
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 118
49353249
Croydon over the same time period (see Table 9.1). Growth in the short to medium term
period (2011–2021) is expected to be lower than in the long term period (2021-2031) across
both the SLFPMA and Croydon, which is expected to see negative growth in office
employment in the short/medium term period.
Table 9.1: CMC Office Employment Forecast by Number, 2011 - 2031
Projections (Actual)
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
SLFPMA 301,350 309,800 319,000 328,400 340,400
LB Croydon 42,900 42,600 42,000 43,400 44,900
Source: URS, 2010; GLA Economics London Employment Time Series 2010 & Reigate and Banstead
Economic Market Assessment 2008
Table 9.2: CMC Office Employment Forecast by Percentage Change, 2011 - 2031
Change (%)
2011-2021
Change (%)
2021-2031
Actual
Absolute
growth
Compound
growth pa Actual
Absolute
growth
Compound
growth pa
SLFPMA 17,650 5.9% 0.6% 21,400 6.7% 0.7%
LB Croydon -900 -2.1% -0.2% 2,900 6.9% 0.7%
Source: URS, 2010; GLA Economics London Employment Time Series 2010 & Reigate and Banstead
Economic Market Assessment 2008
The historical and forecasted growth of the office employment across the SLFPMA and LB
Croydon are set out in the chart below. Over the period 2011 to 2031 the SLFPMA is forecast
to grow by 13.0% and LB Croydon by a lower rate of 4.7%. Given that the wider SLFPMA is
forecast to grow at a faster rate than LB Croydon, the CMC has an opportunity to appeal to
businesses in the property market area and attract a larger share of office employment. How
Croydon might capture a proportion of the growth of demand for office floorspace that is
predicted to occur in the wider PMA is discussed further in 9.6 below.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 119
49353249
Figure 9.1: SLFPMA Historic and Projected Employment Trends (CMC Office)
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031
Year
Em
plo
yee
s
SLFPMA
LB Croydon
Historic Projected
Source: URS, 2010
Local Office & Industrial Employment Forecasts
Table 9.3 below shows the projected office and industrial employment for the LPMA and
Croydon between 2011 and 2031. The actual LPMA office employment growth profile is
approximately twice as large as LB Croydon. Employment in offices across the LPMA is
forecast to increase by over 13,935 workers between 2011 and 2031 and by just 2,000
workers in LB Croydon over the same time period.
Table 9.4 shows that over time the LPMA is forecast to experience a larger decrease in
industrial employment than LB Croydon. There is forecast to be a -17.4% decrease in
industrial employment (-12,591 jobs) in the LPMA compared to -15.7% (-2,900 jobs) over the
same period for LB Croydon.
Table 9.3: Local Office & Industrial Employment Forecast by Number, 2011 - 2031
Projections (Actual)
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
LPMA (Office) 136,365 139,700 143,900 145,900 150,300
LPMA (Industrial) 72,174 67,599 63,426 61,354 59,583
LB Croydon (Office) 42,900 42,600 42,000 43,400 44,900
LB Croydon (Industrial) 18,500 17,300 16,200 15,800 15,600
Source: URS, 2010; GLA Economics London Employment Time Series 2010 & Reigate and Banstead
Economic Market Assessment 2008
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 120
49353249
Table 9.4: Local Office & Industrial Employment Forecast by Percentage Change, 2011–
2031
Change (%)
2011-2021
Change (%)
2021-2031
Actual
Absolute
growth
Compound
growth pa Actual
Absolute
growth
Compound
growth pa
LPMA, Office * 7,290 5.3% 0.5% 6,400 4.4% 0.4%
LPMA, Industrial ** -8,748 -12.1% -1.3% -3,843 -6.1% -0.6%
LB Croydon, Office * -900 -2.1% -0.2% 2,900 6.9% 0.7%
LB Croydon, Industrial** -2,300 -12.4% -1.3% -600 -3.7% -0.4%
Source: URS, 2010; GLA Economics London Employment Time Series 2010 & Reigate and Banstead
Economic Market Assessment 2008
* = Office defined by use class B1a
** = Industry defined by use classes B1b/c, B2/B8
The historical and forecasted growth of the office and industrial employment across the LPMA
and LB Croydon are set out in the Figure 9.2 below.
Figure 9.2: Local Office & Industrial, Historic and Projected Employment Trends
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031
Year
Em
plo
ye
es
LM PMA (Office)
LM PMA (Industrial)
LB Croydon (Office)
LB Croydon
(Industrial)
Historic Projected
Source: URS, 2010; GLA Economics London Employment Time Series 2010 & Reigate and Banstead Economic Market Assessment 2008
9.5 Adjustment of Macro-Economic Demand
The next step is to adjust the forecasts by taking account of factors which will impact upon the
demand for employment floorspace across the borough, not accounted for by the GLA
forecasting. The GLA forecasts consider historic trends of employment, site capacity and
accessibility with consideration of how 'scheduled' transport interventions will affect the
accessibility of employment sites. Factors not considered by the GLA forecasts include
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 121
49353249
unscheduled transport improvements; masterplans; and local regeneration and investment
initiatives and programmes.
These local factors could contribute positively to the economic environment and add to the
borough’s comparative advantage allowing the borough, and the CMC in particular, to capture
a larger share of the forecast office and industrial employment growth across the SLFPMA. To
develop our understanding of the relative strength and opportunities of LB Croydon to the
competing centres of the SLFPMA and the LPMA, we consider below the comparative
strengths the CMC and the wider borough, and any barriers or constraints limiting economic
growth.
We translate these local factors into scenarios of how the borough could capture a larger
share of office employment growth (see Table 9.5).
9.6 Other Factors Impacting on Employment Growth
Investment in transport schemes
A key strength of LB Croydon is its role as a transport hub between the key ‘spokes’ of central
London and Gatwick Airport. LB Croydon can capitalise on these links. Whilst the proposed
addition of a second runway at Gatwick Airport has been postponed indefinitely (likely until
after 2019 at the earliest), plans have been submitted that would allow the airport to handle an
additional six million passengers annually by 2018. The accessibility improvements of this
expansion would have a positive impact on the Gatwick Diamond area. Given the strong
transport connectivity between the CMC and Gatwick, the CMC is well placed to benefit from
economic opportunities arising from expansion.
The East London Line (ELL) extension, which has been recently opened, links the borough
(through West Croydon and Norwood Junction stations) with key growth areas in east London.
Improved access to these areas will likely provide better access to consumers, clients,
suppliers and the labour market. The GLA economic forecasts will have already accounted for
the direct impacts of the ELL extension but there could be further catalytic indirect and induced
impacts to the local area also such as raised market profile, greater awareness of place,
improved perception of place and image, which could draw investment opportunities.
The potential extension to Croydon Tramlink and Thameslink 2000 (reducing journey times to
central London) will also bring demand knock-on effects. These potential transport
improvements are likely to have a positive effect on the relative demand for both office and
industrial land in LB Croydon.
CMC Masterplans
The CMC contains five masterplan areas. Together, these contain enormous potential for
mixed-use development, of which office uses will be a major component. The completion of
these masterplans can create a real stimulus for economic growth and benefits in terms of
increased employment, retail and leisure opportunities for borough residents.
The CMC masterplans are likely to see requirement for sustainable design and construction
techniques to realise higher forms of energy efficient, design specifically for smart, flexible
workspace; and meet the technical requirements of modern businesses. The regenerated
urban realm would enhance perception, a sense of place and competitiveness as a business
location of the CMC to attract inward investment. New build would also impact positively on
staff retention.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 122
49353249
The realisation of these schemes will be influenced by short-term economic trends affecting
development viability, confidence and risk attitudes of developers and key partners. It will also
be influenced greatly by the role that the Council plays as a facilitator, both through policy
intervention.
Rebranding Croydon
Overcoming the perception of CMC as lacking character and suffering from a poor image
presents a challenge. However given the proactive nature displayed by the Council and the
potential redevelopment of the CMC through masterplanning, the rebranding of Croydon may
be possible in the short to medium term. Physical renewal and redevelopment through the
masterplanning process can act as a stimulus for new investment. Innovative, sustainable and
mixed use buildings can act as new landmarks helping to fashion a new identity and image.
The brand of LB Croydon could be enhanced by: utilising the CMC’s designation as a
Strategic Office location; taking action to reduce crime; and implementing public realm
improvements. A focused marketing campaign could make the CMC a more attractive location
for potential occupiers within the SLFPMA.
Supporting growth sectors could prove crucial to ensuring that the borough retains its position
as a preferred location for both large and small enterprises in the South London fringe area.
This could help attract new skilled labour to the borough and serve to broaden the skills base.
It is also likely to have a minor beneficial effect on the demand for industrial premises as
entrepreneurs start to see Croydon as a dynamic area of London and the Surrey fringe and a
suitable location for starting up high tech industrial and logistics businesses.
An Enterprising Borough
LB Croydon recognises the importance of economic diversification and has aspirations to
regenerate deprived areas in Croydon and narrow the gap between these areas and the rest
of Croydon using entrepreneurship as the key driver. The LEGI programme is supported by
significant revenue and capital funding (£77 million). There are major development schemes
across North West Croydon, New Addington and Fieldway, designed to support small
business start up and retention, through networking, business advice, showcasing, the
provision of managed workspace and incubator space, for instance. The initiative is a ten-year
programme.
Public Administration Employment
The public administration sector employs a disproportionately large number of LB Croydon’s
workforce, relative to other competing centres. In the current economic climate and short to
medium term outlook, spending cuts could translate to an absolute reduction in the public
sector workforce.
9.7 Comparative Advantage Assessment
Through desk-based research and in discussion with Stiles Harold Williams, the CMC office
market’s competing centres are:
• Lambeth: SE1 property market area (Vauxhall)
• Southwark: SE1 property market area (London Bridge/Waterloo)
• Lewisham: Lewisham Central and Catford
• Wandsworth: Wandsworth Town Centre, Clapham Junction
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 123
49353249
• Merton: Wimbledon
• Sutton: Sutton and Cheam
• Bromley: Bromley/Beckenham/Orpington
• Reigate and Banstead: Reigate/Redhill
Relative to these town centres, the Croydon has the following comparative strengths and
opportunities relating to employment land:
Strengths
• Economic activity: A large centre whose critical mass makes it less prone to adverse
structural changes. The CMC has a strong retail offering and cluster strength, which
contributes to the economic base and provides significant employment opportunities
and supply chain opportunities for the borough.
• Workforce: Large catchment area owing to transport connectivity, therefore able to
access a diverse and skilled workforce.
• Accessibility: Croydon could justifiably be seen as one of the most significant public
transport hubs in the South London and Surrey area. Key links include; fast trains to
Victoria, London Bridge and Gatwick Airport; the East London line extension; Tramlink
to Wimbledon; and strong airport links. As a result the proximity to customers, markets
and suppliers are deemed to be positive factors for Croydon as a place to do
business. Due to comparatively poor East/West transport links, the catchments of
occupiers and travel to work are stronger North to South - following the logical
transport route of the A23 and the main London to Brighton railway line.
• Sites and premises: Good stock of development sites available in key CMC
locations, which create the potential for the centre to grow. The CMC can offer
anything from small one to two person offices in serviced business centres to an entire
20,000 sqm stand alone office building. The rental values of stock is also considerably
lower than central London, adding to the borough’s competitive economic advantage.
Opportunities
• Key sites and masterplans: Significant opportunities revolve around the five
masterplans of the CMC, which are being currently progressed. Collectively, they
could bring about deliver 156,000 sqm (gross) of new high quality office stock and
drive the regeneration of the CMC bringing about positive a change to the living,
working and retail environment, image and brand. Sites such as Ruskin Square (West
of East Croydon Station CMC 2b) and 100 George Street (located on the north east
corner of the College Green masterplan site, CMC 4a) would provide Grade A office
space able to attract occupiers from central London boroughs looking for a cost
effective location. The masterplanning and improvement of the CMC would act as a
catalyst for other new development, by acting as a rental trigger and improve the
viability for other new build and refurbishment. In particular, as previously observed,
the Ruskin Square site is ‘of sufficient size to accommodate a critical mass of
landmark development of the level required to achieve a step change in Croydon’
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 124
49353249
(para. 3.3, Savills 2006). 30
A quickly let scheme would provide a strong indicator to
occupiers that the CMC market is strengthening, increase the likelihood of further
office development, and tackle perceptions and sentiments of what the CMC is worth.
• Gatwick airport expansion and competing centres: Although the proposed
expansion of the airport, by the addition of a second runway, has been postponed, this
could potentially materialise in the latter years of the Plan period. Nevertheless, plans
have been submitted that would allow the airport to handle an additional six million
passengers annually by 2018, with Croydon potentially benefiting from this
commercially owing to its proximity and links to the airport. Demand for other local
areas such as Sutton, which also provides a significant volume of office space, has
seen general decline as it is increasingly seen as a peripheral location with less
favourable transport links.
• Strengthening the established business location: Croydon is a well-established
office location, reflected by its allocation in the London Plan. If weaknesses can be
addressed / mitigated then its strong critical mass and potential for expansion would
likely precipitate future growth.
• Supporting local enterprise: The local authority is supportive of local enterprise. The
Council’s LEGI programme, which seeks to enhance SME start-up, growth and
retention, has so far contributed positively to economic growth, productivity and
diversity, particularly in local centres which are underperforming.31
32
The Croydon Economic Development Company will play an important role in
strengthening the name of Croydon as a business location and supporting local
enterprise. The CEDC is ‘committed to economic development through skills and
employment, business investment, marketing of strategic sites and the improvement of
the underlying economic infrastructure’. It has strong partnerships with Croydon
businesses, Croydon Business Improvement District (BID) and Croydon Council.
• Changing work practices: Public sector departments have been particularly
proactive in encouraging home-working / hot-desking, which may have implications for
the demand for floorspace. More research needs to be undertaken to understand how
home-working trends could impact on the demand for floorspace. Potentially a growth
in home-working could lead to an increase in demand for business support space/
units, similar to ‘tele-centres’ to serve as meeting space or technology centres, in
areas outside the CMC.
• The Core Strategy education and skills strategy proposes to bring forward a
‘multiversity’ (a range of institutions offering both further and higher education levels).
The concept would look to enhance the competitiveness of the local workforce by
30 FBD Savills (2006); Proof of Evidence of David Williams (title unknown) and Donaldsons (August 2007); ‘Arrowcroft Group
Plc, Croydon Gateway Office Market Report, To Include Q1 and Q2 2007’
31 However, 2010-11 is the last financial year for the LEGI programme. An initial estimate is that approximately £8.6m will be
spent by the programme in 2010-2011. £29m was spent by the programme in years 2006/07 to 2009/10. (Information provided
by the Council).
32 See page 21, public spending cuts recently announced could mean that the LEGI programme is discontinued.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 125
49353249
improving access to education and skills. Work with Croydon College, Croydon
Economic Development Company and academic institutions to attract university
campuses to the borough.
Weaknesses
• Quality of office stock: The existing office stock is generally considered to be old
and, according to some reports33
, not fit for purposes. Issues with old stock include:
small average floor plate size; low ceiling heights incapable of raised floors and air
conditioning systems required in modern office construction and Codes of Practices
(for instance relating to health and safety and environmental impact); excessive
columns; solid floors and limited floor to ceiling heights limit the installation of flexible
workspace and technical requirements. Previous reports have found that the market is
no longer accepting of poor quality, largely aesthetic refurbishments. Vacancy for old
stock is significantly higher than new build, however there have been few completions
of grade A stock over last few years. The lack of newly built high quality stock has
impacted on the attractiveness of the location, and rates of inward investment. For
example, large corporate occupiers would not be comfortable leasing a building that
would be detrimental to it’s corporate image and therefore tend to demand only recent
office buildings.
• An insular commercial property market: Croydon tends to rely on existing occupiers
to expand or change building in order to increase take up. The lack of incoming
occupiers means that the town in susceptible to wider economic variables and the
manner in which these affect the sectors located within the town.
• Comparatively low attainment in education and skills: Qualification levels of
residents are below the London average, which could make other competitor locations
in south London more attractive.
• Sector representation: The office market in particular is heavily reliant on the public
sector, which provides a third of all workplace employment opportunities across the
borough. Relative to Great Britain, LB Croydon has relatively high representation in
information & communication and professional, scientific and technical sectors
(location quotient of 1.47 and 1.14 respectively), however compared with London, the
borough has low representation in growth sectors and strengths in lower employment
generating sectors such as motor trades & parts, health, education and retail (1.73,
1.33, 1.30 and 1.21).34
• Image: Croydon’s public realm and amenities are perceived to be of low quality and
this detracts from its locational attractiveness. Croydon CMC has a high proportion of
buildings built in the 1960’s and 1970’s, which have been refurbished over the course
of time though are perceived as being externally unattractive.35
33 FBD Savills (2006); Proof of Evidence of David Williams (title unknown) and Donaldsons (August 2007); ‘Arrowcroft Group
Plc, Croydon Gateway Office Market Report, To Include Q1 and Q2 2007’
34 Location quotient based on workplace employment, ONS Annual Business Inquiry data, 2008, SIC 2007
35 Evidenced by the PACEC report: Croydon Office Market Review (September 2007)
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 126
49353249
• Congested roads: While Croydon is served by a number of A-roads, these can
become congested. In particular, the A23 from the M25 Junction 7 to Croydon via
Coulsdon and Purley is a particular source of congestion and can act as a deterrent
for those commuting from outside of the M25 sphere.
Threats
• Competing centres: Central London boroughs offer a greater opportunity to locate
near to complementary businesses. To the south, the towns of Reigate and Redhill
benefit from more modern office stock, driven in main by the construction of the M25
and the increased accessibility. These towns can be accessed quickly from the M25
and M23 and the buildings generally have more generous parking ratios.
• Lack of high quality, new stock: Occupiers can see the lack of recent stock as a
sign that Croydon is stagnating and generally failing to attract inward investment into
the construction sector. Low rents in CMC may discourage some developers from
bringing sites forward, particularly compared to rents received elsewhere in inner
London, e.g. Southwark Bankside (within the SLFPMA). The lack of renewal of stock
means that ‘there is a real possibility that it will lose long-established businesses to
more attractive locations. Its prospects of attracting in-movers are minimal until there
has been some major upgrade of its stock and, just as importantly, of its wider
environment.’ (LOPR, 2007).
• Physical environment: Croydon competes with locations such as Redhill/ Reigate
which are seen as more suburban. These towns in particular, are located within the
Green Belt and therefore provide what is considered a more pleasant environment
with a larger volume of green spaces nearby. In contrast, Croydon is viewed very
much as a London Borough and an urban environment, despite the fact that the Green
Belt reaches within one kilometre of the CMC. The appearance of the 1960’s/70’s
building in combination with other wider economic factors such as crime rate and
deprivation (predominantly to the north of the borough) can influence people’s opinion
of the town before they consider it as a viable location.36
• Corporate retrenchment/ contraction: The CMC’s two key sectors public
administration and financial services have been adversely affected by recent
economic trends and the future outlook for these sectors is currently uncertain,
especially in the light of cuts in public spending announced by the coalition
government. Should there be withdrawal from the town by a large-scale public sector
occupier, such as the Home Office, the result would be large volumes of second hand
space returned to the market, which would have a depressive affect on rents.
Though a number of threats facing LB Croydon have been identified, the borough has the
potential to tackle these and convert them to opportunities.
36 56% of respondents to a survey by the Safer Croydon Partnership (2007), felt that crime or fear of crime in the local area
impacted on firms’ decisions whether to locate there. 46% of businesses interviewed had been a victim of crime in the last six
months.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 127
49353249
9.8 Summary of Local Factors
Table 9.5 presents what affect the local factors are likely to have on each of the land use
types in the SLFPMA and LPMA forecasts. This is in the format of either a higher (�) demand
than the regional forecasts, a lower (�) demand than the regional forecasts or a comparable to
demand to the regional forecasts (�).
Table 9.5: Modified Forecasts
SLFPMA Local PMA
CMC Office (B1a) Local Office (B1a) B2 Factories B8 Warehouses
Local Factors
Investment in transport ���� ���� ���� ����
Realisation of masterplans ������������ � � �
Rebranding / marketing �������� ���� ���� ����
An enterprising borough ���� ���� ���� ����
Public administration ���� � � �
Comparative Advantages
Economic activity ����
Workforce �
Transport / Accessibility ������������
Sites and premises ��������
Source: URS, 2010
n/a = No comparative advantages made – not applicable
In summary, it is judged that LB Croydon has a number of positive local factors which are
planned or could come forward, and inherent comparative advantages over the competing
centres of the SLFPMA and the LPMA. In combination these factors and advantages could
enable higher rates of growth of office and industrial employment in the borough over the
planning period than those identified in the 2010 GLA forecasts as described in section 9.4
above.
We apply three development rates (low, medium and high, to represent three scenarios of
growth) to each of the employment forecasts for CMC Office, Local Market Office and Local
Market Industrial. The scenarios represent positive growth scenarios, but also the uncertainty
associated with likelihood, risk and timing of large-scale development e.g. whether or not
masterplans will come forward. These different scenarios are shown in Table 9.6 below.
The rates correspond approximately to the higher and lower employment percentage growth
by use class across the different PMAs and LB Croydon, as shown previously in Table 9.2 and
Table 9.4, and a midpoint value between these representing the medium growth scenario. All
scenarios correspond to the 20 year planning period, 2010 to 2031. Growth rates are
explained below.
For the CMC office land use forecast, the three scenarios for employment growth are: high,
SLFPMA office employment growth of 13.0% (rounded to 15%); low, LB Croydon office
employment growth of 4.7% (round to 5%) and a medium growth rate of 10.0%. The market
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 128
49353249
assessment by Stiles Harold Williams supports the view that strong growth can materialise in
the CMC.
Following this logic, the local office land use forecast three growth scenarios for employment
growth would be: high, LPMA office employment growth of 10.0%; low, LB Croydon office
employment growth of 5% and a medium growth rate of 7.5%. However, analysis of the local
office markets by Stiles Harold Williams suggests that the demand trend has been weak in
recent years and there have been no new development completions. They are of a firm belief
that demand is likely to remain static with potential for the continued trend of loss to other
uses, such as residential, in the medium term up to 2031. On this basis we halve the high
growth rate and apply a 0% rate for the lower scenario. This gives us scenario growth rates of
0%, 2.5% and 5%, for low, medium and high scenarios, respectively.
For industrial land use forecast, the LPMA and LB Croydon, the forecast percentage growth
are broadly similar: -17.4% to –15.7%. As such the low scenario can be taken as –15.0%. In
order to create a meaningful variance in growth scenarios, and because of the local factors
and comparative advantage of Croydon described in section 9.5 and positive economic
outlook for warehousing sector as explained in section 7, it is considered appropriate to
introduce a high scenario of –5%. The medium scenario is therefore taken as the midpoint of –
10.0%.
Table 9.6: Growth Scenarios, 2011 to 2031
Low scenario Medium scenario High scenario
Office, CMC* +5% +10% +15%
Office, Local* 0% +.2.5% +5%
Industry ** -15% -10% -5%
Source: URS
* = B1a
** = B1b/c, B2/B8
9.9 Summary of Floorspace Forecast
The net growth in demand for CMC Office, Local Market Office and Local Market Industrial
floorspace over the planning period, 2011 to 2031 is set out in Table 9.7.
The gross floorspace forecast is based on the current estimation of floorspace taken from the
VOA multiplied by the GLA employment forecasting model and then presented as three
different growth scenarios. The scenarios are founded on a belief that LB Croydon can capture
a larger share of the office employment market due to positive local factors which are planned
for or proposed and the comparative advantages the location has, as described above.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 129
49353249
Table 9.7: LB Croydon Employment Gross Floorspace Forecast in 2031
Future Floorspace (2031)
Current Floorspace* Low Scenario Medium Scenario High Scenario
Office CMC* 619,000 649,950 680,900 711,850
Office Local* 130,000 130,000 133,250 136,500
Industry ** 943,000 801,550 848,700 895,850
Total 1,692,000 1,581,500 1,662,850 1,744,200
Source: *VOA 2008 & URS, 2010
Note: B1a Office data by VOA data by middle layer Super Output Area
* = B1a
** = B1b/c, B2/B8
Table 9.8 below shows the indicative additional floorspace demand in square metres for CMC
Office, Local Market Office and Local Market Industrial floorspace for the short to medium term
period (2011-2021) and the long term period (2021-2031). The estimates are based on the
Table 9.7.
Table 9.8: LB Croydon Forecast of Additional Floorspace Demand (sqm)
Years 2011-21 Years 2021-31 Years 2011-31
Low Medium High Low Medium High Low Medium High
Office, CMC* 14,492 28,985 43,477 16,458 32,915 49,373 30,950 61,900 92,850
Office, Local* 0 1,776 3,552 0 1,474 2,948 0 3,250 6,500
Industry ** -94,041 -62,694 -31,347 -47,409 -31,606 -15,803 -141,450 -94,300 -47,150
Source: *VOA 2008 & URS, 2010
* = B1a
** = B1b/c, B2/B8
The forecast for additional floorspace above demonstrates that there is projected to be lower
demand for employment floorspace in the short to medium term period compared to the longer
term period. This is likely to be due to the continuing impact of the recession. 37
9.10 Other Relevant Employment Land Uses
Waste Management and Recycling
Earlier this year a document was published for public consultation (between 8 February and 22
March 2010) which sought to gather views on selected sites suitability for waste management
purposes. The overall objective of the South London Waste Plan is to assess supply and
demand for waste and recycling facilities so that sites can be safeguarded in the respective
Local Development Frameworks and the targets of the London Plan. The London Waste
37 This note does not make any reference of rising employment to floorspace densities. For instance, in its preferred scenario,
the LOPR 2007 assumes a rising density of employment to floorspace, increasing from 16.3sqm to 13.9sqm per head.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 130
49353249
Apportionment Study38
, which informs the London Plan, indicates that there is demand for 8.0
hectares of land in the LB Croydon for waste management use between 2006 and 2021, it is
not anticipated that any further sites will need to be allocated for waste management and
recycling usage between 2021 and 2031.
Utilities & Land for Public Transport
URS research for the GLA (2010) suggests that although there will be increased demand for
utilities services, utilities providers are generally expected to renew existing sites, or co-locate
with other land uses, rather than require additional sites on industrial land. The research
suggests that generally there is adequate existing land capacity within the utility infrastructure
networks and assets to accommodate the demand from most of London in the near future.
Likewise, additional land for public transport has been assumed to remain zero in LB Croydon
up to 2026 as URS research for the GLA (2010) suggests that additional land requirements for
land for public transport is likely to be negligible.
9.11 Summary of Employment Land Forecast
The demand exercise indicates an increased demand for B1a floorspace in the CMC between
2011 and 2031. This increase in demand ranges from 30,950 sqm in the low growth scenario
to 92,850 sqm in the high growth scenario. For local office there is also expected to be no
additional demand (low demand scenario) up to 6,500 sqm to in the high growth scenario. For
Industrial and Warehousing additional demand is expected to fall over the period with a
reduction of between 141,450 sqm and 47,150 sqm of floorspace.
The 2004 CLG ELR guidance, states that where possible employment floorspace should be
converted to employment land using plot ratios.39
However, given that the office development
in the CMC can vary considerably (from 3 to 20 plus storeys) it is not considered suitable to
convert the additional demand of office floorspace into land. However, development density
(plot ratio and storey height) tends to be static for industrial and warehousing premises,
typified by a plot ratio of 0.5 (an average figure for industrial and warehousing floorspace, as
recommended on page 101 of the ELR guidance) over one storey. The additional demand for
industrial and warehousing floorspace is converted into land, as shown in Table 9.9.
Table 9.9: Additional Demand for Industrial Land* (ha)
2011 – 2021 2021- 2031 Total, 2011-2031
Low Medium High Low Medium High Low Medium High
-18.8 -12.5 -6.3 -9.5 -6.3 -3.2 -28.3 -18.8 -9.5
* = Industry defined as B1b/c, B2/B8
The employment driven forecasts for industrial and warehousing land show in Table 9.9
suggest a declining demand over the period 2011 to 2031. However, the figures in Table 9.9
do not account for factors such as the changing demand for waste and recycling land and the
need to retain an appropriate level of vacant or derelict land for developers to build new
industrial buildings (termed frictional vacancy and normally accepted as being between 5% of
38 GLA London Waste Apportionment Study (Jacobs Babtie on behalf of the GLA, 2006)
39 Page 47 of the Guidance
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 131
49353249
total stock). Industrial land demand in LB Croydon should also be seen in the context of the
GLA Industrial Capacity SPG, which states that LB Croydon is in the ‘restricted transfer’
category, that is the release of industrial land to other uses should be restricted in order to
retain an adequate supply of industrial and warehousing land in the borough. The
consideration of these other factors and resulting net industrial and warehouse land demand is
shown in Table 9.10. The mid-range growth scenario indicates that there will be a slight fall in
land demand over the planning period.
Table 9.10: LB Croydon Employment Floorspace Demand, 2011 to 2031
Additional elements of demand for B2/B8 land use Low Medium High
1. Gross supply of B2/B8 Land in LB Croydon in 2010:
B2/B8 = 180.7 ha, which includes existing land for waste mgmt &
recycling, transport functions & utilities; and vacant land *
180.7
2. Net frictional land vacancy requirement to 2031 (Ha):
5% of 180.7ha ** +9.04
3. Additional demand for waste and recycling land:
Figure from the London Waste Apportionment Study +8.0
4. Projected demand in floorspace
Additional demand for industrial and warehousing land (Ha) –
section 9 of this report
-28.3 -18.8 -9.5
5. Gross demand for B2/B8 land 2011 - 2031 (Ha) 169.4 178.9 188.2
6. Net Demand for B2/B8 Employment Land 2011-2031 (Ha) -11.3 -1.8 7.5
Source: URS, 2010
* = LDA London Industrial Land Baseline (2010) p81
** = GLA London Industrial Land Release Benchmarks (2007), p66
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 132
49353249
10 REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
The forecasting exercise illustrates a growth in demand in office floorspace over the planning
period, under two of the three scenarios proposed (low and medium), the majority of which will
be required in the CMC. Though the forecast indicates a minor decline in industrial floorspace
in two scenarios (low and medium), there is need to consider how industrial sites could be
redeveloped to improve management and operation.
This section considers how and where the forecast growth in office floorspace could be
accommodated and industrial clusters which would benefit from redevelopment. The analysis
set out in this section is informed by the proceeding sections 5, 6, and 7, that is the empirical
evidence collected through the site surveys; an appraisal of site marketability and
development constraints by Stiles Harold Williams; identification of known potential pipeline
deals; and discussions with key stakeholders. This analysis will inform the development of site
specific and generic recommendations.
Below we present a short list of clusters which are best placed to accommodate
redevelopment. The term ‘redevelopment’ is used to describe new build activity; development
that could take place on a vacant / derelict site or in the place of a currently occupied building;
or intensification (e.g. extra storeys added / increase of plot ratio).
Many of the sites in the CMC are likely to come forward as part of mixed use development.
The potential for these clusters to accommodate employment floorspace should be considered
in parallel other LDF related land use studies.
10.1 Clusters Best Suited for Redevelopment
The specific characteristics which determine the potential for redevelopment differ by use
class and location:
CMC Office Redevelopment
Employment clusters surveyed in the CMC area suitable for accommodating B1 office
redevelopment were identified based on the existence of the following site conditions and
wider factors:
• Poor Quality/Ageing Office Stock
• Poor Quality of Public Realm
• Vacant developable land present
• Derelict buildings present
• Low (>50%) building – plot ratio
• Low building heights (in relation to surroundings), and
• High marketability rating and lack of development constraints.
Clusters most suitable to accommodate redevelopment are set out in Table 10.1 and identified
1st, 2
nd and 3
rd priority levels.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 133
49353249
Local Office Redevelopment
Clusters in the ‘Local’ area suitable for accommodating B1 office redevelopment /
intensification were identified based on their possessing the following site conditions, potential
and wider factors:
• Good/ Very Good Quality of public realm / environment
• Vacant developable land present
• Good/ Very Good PTAL rating
• Existing presence of B1 occupiers
• Very Good Access to Facilities and Amenities, and
• High marketability rating and lack of development constraints.
Clusters most suitable to accommodate redevelopment are set out in Table 10.2.
Local Industrial Redevelopment
Local area clusters suitable for accommodating redevelopment or intensification of B2/B8
activities were identified based on their possessing the following site conditions, potential, and
wider factors:
• Majority of sites in cluster being of Poor/ Very Poor condition
• Vacant developable land available or high degree of building vacancy
• Potential to accommodate SME workspace
• Existing servicing issues, and
• High marketability rating and lack of development constraints.
Clusters most suitable to accommodate redevelopment are set out in Table 10.3.
10.2 Gross and Net Potential Floorspace
Clusters in the CMC
For CMC clusters, we consider the potential net gain of those sites given a 1st and 2nd level
priority for redevelopment, as per Table 10.1. It is considered that all of these priority 1 and 2
clusters have the potential to come forward during the planning period.
Table 10.4 presents estimates of the potential net gain in office floorspace that could come
forward from these priority 1 and 2 clusters. It is important to consider the net gain for many
CMC clusters do not have vacant or derelict land or premises and therefore redevelopment
would result in a loss of existing office floorspace. For masterplan clusters (CMC 2a, b; CMC
3a, b; and CMC 4a) indicative estimates of potential office floorspace are used.40
, whereas for
other clusters in the CMC (10a, b, 13 and 14), absent of any proposals, the estimates for
potential floorspace have been based on professional judgement of the potential plot ratio, and
40 As per the emerging design concepts of the masterplan sites, provided by the Council’s Urban Design Team early June 2010.
These figures are subject to change and depend on a variety of factors in particular financial viability, marketability and demand
modelling.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 134
49353249
building heights guided by URS’ site surveys and checked by the Council’s Planning and
Urban Design Team.
The estimates suggest that:
• The CMC masterplans with redevelopment priority 1 and 2 (CMC 2a, b; CMC 3a, b;
and CMC 4a) have the potential to deliver a net gain of 76,455 sqm.
• The maximum office floorspace that could be delivered by non-masterplan clusters of
priority 1 and 2 (CMC 10a, b, 13 and 14) is 185,215 sqm.
In total, therefore, the net gain potential of office floorspace is 261,670 sqm – significantly
higher than the high growth demand forecast in the CMC over the planning period, of 92,850
sqm.
Clusters Outside the CMC
Given the relatively static additional demand forecast for office floorspace outside the CMC (0
sqm to 6,500 sqm) and for industry and warehousing land (-1.8 ha, mid-scenario) over the
planning period, the sites listed in tables 10.2 and 10.3 have not been given priority weightings
nor has the potential floorspace or land quantum arising from redevelopment estimated.
The ways in which the minor growth in demand for office floorspace outside the CMC and the
minor decline in industry and warehousing can be dealt with are considered as part of the
recommendations, in the following section.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 135
49353249
Table10.1: Clusters in the CMC Best Suited for Office Redevelopment
URS
Cluster
No.
Cluster Area Quality
of Stock
Quality of
Pub.
Realm
Vacant
Land
Derelict-
ion
Plot
Ratio
Heights Marketability
(1-5)
Attractiveness (Key points) Constraints (Key points) Priority
Tier:
1 , 2, 3
CMC 2b East Croydon Masterplan Area (West)
� � � 1
• Largest and best known redevelopment site in the CMC.
• Strong awareness among London based property agents.
• Largely vacant site with simple ownership structure.
• Adjacent to East Croydon station and areas of highest footfall.
• Potential to footbridge access between to site and train platforms.
• The site has been mothballed for a number of years.
• Size of site requires greater critical mass for developments or high reliance on residential element. 1
CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of College Road)
� � 1
• Excellent location: located on major crossroads; adjacent to George Street - the main pedestrian thoroughfare between Wellesley Road and East Croydon station; close proximity to East Croydon station.
• Planning consent granted for 100 George Street, a 17 storey building offering 258,000 sqft (24,970 sqm) of Grade A office accommodation.
• Established planning for part of the site for the Kramer development.
• Strong potential for ground floor retail frontage.
• Variety of tenants now in place on longer leases.
• Established development proposals require significant critical mass of circa 50% of pre lets.
1
CMC 10b George Street and Landsdowne Rd (George Street)
� 1 • Excellent location.
• Established location for office and retail uses.
• Low intensity (storey height) of current land use.
• Multiple ownership and established tenants makes redevelopment unattractive and, left to market dynamics, unlikely. 1
CMC 10a George Street and Lansdowne Rd (Dingwall Road)
� � 2 • Part of site has established planning consent for 23,225 sqm of office
• Close proximity to East Croydon station.
• Located within office core of the CMC.
• Site currently unattractive with derelict buildings and occupied by The Job Centre.
• Close proximity to competing East Croydon Station Masterplan. 1
CMC 2a East Croydon Masterplan Area (East)
� � � � 2 • Very close proximity to East Croydon Station.
• ‘Quieter’ location on the edge of the CMC.
• Established, well marketed office buildings within immediate vicinity.
• Site in multiple ownership.
• Previous proposals seen as unrealistic. 2
CMC 14 Car Park to north of Lansdowne Rd
� � � 2 • Good location in ‘office core’ close to East Croydon
• Opportunity to improve dated multi storey car park
• Established occupier.
• Close to competing East Croydon Station Masterplan. 2
CMC 13 Cross Road � � � 3 • Close to East Croydon station.
• Close to the East Croydon Station Masterplan.
• Established occupation.
• Peripheral to the retail centre and areas of highest footfall.
• Better sites likely to become available sooner.
2
CMC 3b
Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park Street)
� � � 3
• The largest site with significant retail capacity.
• High pedestrian footfall in parts also with frontage to Wellesley Rd.
• Likely to become developable within the next five to ten years.
• Image of site tarnished by abortive Park Place development.
• Quality of site has become unattractive and sparsely occupied due to previous CPO process. Dominated by budget retailers
2
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street)
� � 4 • Centrally located site with good access to Croydon High Street.
• Established retail and office occupiers and uses.
• The site is under multiple ownership.
• Image somewhat tarnished by abortive Park Place scheme.
• Park Street has comparatively low footfall and is dominated by buses.
2
CMC 5 Old Town: Cairo Road
� 2
• Current low density use, therefore potential to increase value through intensification and planning.
• Good access to Roman Way and well served by the Tramlink network.
• Poor location on the CMC fringe directly adjacent to busy raised A rd
• Location is too far from the town centre to be seriously considered as an office location and too far from industrial areas for B2/B8 uses.
• Most marketable as a mixed use/ housing led development.
3
CMC 7 Wellesley Square � 2 • Site has planning for mixed commercial and residential use.
• Close proximity to West Croydon with new London overground link.
• The majority of frontage is to vehicle dominated Wellesley Road.
• Distance from East Croydon station. 3
CMC 9
Land between Lansdowne Road and Sydenham Road
� � 3
• Large site within the office core of the CMC. • Dominated by public sector use (Home Office).
• Too complex for site to be remodelled 3
CMC 11a Whitgift Centre (Wellesley Road side)
� 3 • Established retail and office uses.
• Recent refurbishment of Centre Point.
• Interrelates with Wellesley Road Masterplan.
• Site likely to be expensive to fully redevelop due to existing buildings
• Complex to remodel any intensification 3
CMC 11b Whitgift Centre (North End)
� 3 • Large established shopping centre use.
• Development potential to alter existing rather than build new.
• Site likely to be expensive to fully redevelop due to existing buildings
• Complex to remodel any intensification 3
CMC 6 Between Mason’s Avenue and Croydon Flyover
� � 4
• Good frontage to quieter southern end of High Street.
• Sites dominated by two large office buildings (Leon House and Grosvenor House) and is in multiple ownership.
• Distance from East Croydon Station is the maximum office occupiers would reasonably consider.
3
CMC 12a
North End and Lennard Rd End (East of London Road)
� � 4
• Good sized developable site which has been cleared
• Close to West Croydon station
• Residential and commercial development potential.
• West Croydon is generally perceived as under-developed and lacks critical massing of employment sites.
3
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey (2010) and Stiles Harold Williams market assessment
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 136
49353249
Table 10.2: Clusters Outside the CMC Best Suited for Office Redevelopment
URS
Cluster
No.
Cluster
Area
Condition
of Cluster
Vacant
Land/
Building
Vacancy
Contains
Existing B1
Floorspace
Access to
Facilities
and
Amenities
PTAL Potential
for SME
Work-
space
Marketability
(1-5)
Site Description
C12 Cane Hill � � � � 1
The cluster comprises the former Cane Hill Hospital Site and its grounds. There are several protected buildings remaining, the rest of the site is empty/cleared or designated as a site of importance for nature conservation. The site is earmarked in local policy as a mixed-use B1a/b/c location. The site is large and its characteristics therefore vary due to location. The adjacent road network is of good quality and Coulsdon District Centre is nearby. Potential site to accommodate SME workspace, innovation units and or grow on space.
C19 Purley � � � � 3
The town centre contains some good quality office premises and is well served by public and road transport. At the time of survey, there appeared to be a relatively high level of office vacancy, with some premises above retail being of poor quality.
C20 Coulsdon � � � � 3
Coulsdon contains one medium sized office building and 2-3 car repair workshops, with potentially more office floorspace above retail. There is one cleared site which was a housing development. The district centre is generally well presented and has a range of facilities.
C13 Upper Norwood
� � � � � 4
The cluster is a busy local centre containing limited employment space. Existing workspace (studios and workshops) is of average quality, and could potentially be developed on their existing plots to enhance the provision for creative industries offer. There are also several low-grade offices at first-floor level.
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 137
49353249
Table 10.3: Clusters Outside the CMC Best Suited for Industry / Warehousing Redevelopment
URS
Cluster
No.
Cluster Area Condition
of Cluster
Vacant Land/
High Level of
Bldg. Vac.
Road
Access
SME
Workspace
Servicing
Issues
Marketability
(1-5)
Site Description
C2d Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area)
� � � 1
The James Business Park at Mill Lane and neighbouring sites are generally of poor quality, containing older stock with some existing vacancy and signs of dereliction. The cluster is of low density. The environment is currently visually incompatible with its surroundings and there may be some impact on residential use at the access road. Car parking conflict with surrounding land use. Out of keeping with rest of the SIL but has opportunities to intensify.
C6a Selsdon Road (North)
� � 2
This cluster comprises mainly low intensity uses including a car repair shop, builders yard, car storage compound and a cement works. The area is not well maintained and is accessed via a heavily sloping road. There is little parking and the surrounding area is either rail or built-up. Existing uses are demarcated from residential area.
C6b Selsdon Road (Central)
� � 2
This is a well used portion of the Selsdon Road employment area, containing largely industrial uses. There are some issues with its use, such as lack of parking, and some servicing issues, but this does not appear to impact on site occupancy at present.
C7 Vulcan Way � � 4
This is an isolated industrial employment area, which generally functions well. It contains mostly SMEs engaged in B1c/B2 activities. There are several buildings containing serviced workspace. Access is through a residential area, albeit low-density. Site offers good separation from residential areas. Able to accommodate demand from larger businesses from surrounding area.
C11
Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site)
� � � 2
The Day recycling of aggregates site is well used with good quality, light, structures. Junction improvements have been made to accommodate their use of HGVs. There is however a conflict of uses at the cluster access point, which it shares with Purley Rail station.
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 138
49353249
Table 10.4: CMC Potential Net Gain of Priority 1 and 2 Clusters Suitable for Redevelopment
Source: URS Croydon Employment Land Field Survey, 2010. Note that this list is not a ranking of the clusters
* = Guided by site survey and professional judgement
** = Existing office space figures are estimates by LB Croydon Council
NA + = Not included as gross and net gains in floorspace for masterplan clusters are based on the draft plans provided by the LB Croydon Urban Design Team as of early June 2010
NA - = Not included as the maximum gross and maximum net gains in floorspace for non-masterplan clusters are based on the potential plot ratio of sites (judged) and average potential storey heights deduced via URS site survey and professional judgement
Existing Potential:
Maximum Office Development
Potential:
Masterplan Proposals
URS
Cluster No.
Priority
Tier 1st and
2nd
Cluster Area
Site Area (ha)
Plot Ratio
Height (Storeys)
Existing office
floorspace (sqm) *
Existing Usage Plot Ratio (%)
Height (Storeys)*
Max Gross (sqm)
Max Net Gain
(sqm)
Gross (sqm)
Net Gain (sqm)
Comment
CMC 2a East Croydon Masterplan Area (East)
3.03 60-100 7 10,690 • Taxi rank
• Railway station, lines & siding
• 7/8 storey PO Sorting Office "Porter & Sorter PH" 8 storey B1a office building
• 1 to 2 storey B1c/B1a vacant former meat processor buildings
• Vacant 4 storey C3 apartment blocks
80 10-15 Na + Na + • Gross sqm as per masterplan proposal, as of 16th June 2010.
• Small industrial land use on north east of the site, south of Cherry Orchard Rd would be lost / consider relocation to employment land area.
• Need to consider land use for transport interchange (taxi, buses etc.)
• Masterplan proposals residential and retail land use as well as office.
CMC 2b East Croydon Masterplan Area (West)
6.80 <10 (largely vacant)
Up to 3- 4 0 • Vacant land with D1 (Theatre) and railways storage area, storage yards & engineering works
50 10-20 Na + Na + 146,620 135,930 • Cluster able to accommodate tall buildings.
• Stepped building heights – highest in centre of cluster and lowest along Dingwall Rd / rail tracks. Presence of Railway to acts as site constraint.
• Need to consider re-homing of theatre off Dingwall Rd. and account for Network Rail operational requirements (currently have land on site.
• Masterplan proposals include significant residential and retail land use as well as office.
CMC 3a Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street)
1.44 (all land north of Park St)
90 3 • A1 shops and leisure space fronting onto George Street.
90 4-8 Na + Na + • Gross sqm as per masterplan proposals, as of 16th June 2010.
• Potential for higher to accommodate significantly larger gross office floorspace
CMC 3b
Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park Street)
2.86 80 4
63,894
• Park Place A1 shops and 6 storey B1a offices (many vacant)
• St Georges House 18/20 storey office building 2/3 storey vacant PH/Club premises
• Listed B1a 5 storey office building (vacant)
80 4-8 Na + Na +
9,000 -54,894
• Key employer - Nestlé – has HQ on east side of cluster.
• Significant vacant office stock, one building understood to be owned by Nestlé to be used as decant strategy for any redevelopment of Nestlé building.
• Currently significant proportion of SME retailers, voluntary and community organisations. Consideration should be given how to accommodate / re-home.
• Would result in a significant loss of SME retail units and office units which are located around the perimeter of the cluster.
CMC 4a College Green Masterplan (North of College Road)
Maste
rpla
ns
0.76 90 4-7 4,581 • 7 storey B1a Office building
• Vacant land – 100 George St. planning consent awarded.
• 4 storey office building
• Suffolk House A1 shops B1a 3storey over (mostly vacant)
90 8-30 Na + Na + 0 -4,581 • Consent for 100 George Street, 23,970 sqm (17 storeys). The schedule indicates that less than 400 sqm will be non-office floorspace
• Prospect to significantly intensify (through new build) the corner location George St. – Wellesley Rd.
• Likely that only one corner of Wellesley Road / George Street could be developed to a height of 30 storeys.
CMC 10a George Street and Lansdowne Rd (Dingwall Road)
0.81 70 10 15,325 • Vacant land – fenced.
• Derelict B1a office building 70 10-12 62,370 47,045 Na - Na - • Neighbouring buildings could constraint storey heights
• Part of site has planning consent [check pipeline figure]
CMC 10b George Street and Landsdowne Rd (George Street)
0.66 60 10-12 0 (vacant / derelict)
• Norfolk House A1 shops with 1 - 2 storey b1a over and up to 12 storey C1 over
70 10-12 50,820 50,820 Na - Na - • Vacant building could be more intensively used
CMC 13 Cross Road
0.59 25 6 6,000 • 6 storey vacant B1a office building 50 10-12 32,450 26,450 Na - Na - • Vacant 1960s public sector office building in poor condition. Appears not fit for further occupation. There is low density residential bordering the site which could constraint building height.
CMC 14 Car Park to north of Lansdowne Rd
No
n-m
aste
rpla
n s
ite
s
0.87 40 5 0 • 5 storey car park 70 10 60,900 60,900 Na - Na - • Redevelopment of this site would result in a loss of car parking space, which may need to be catered for elsewhere.
Total 100,490 185,215 76,455 Grand maximum net gain = 185,215 + 76,455 = 216,670 sqm.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 139
49353249
11 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This section sets out conclusions and recommendations for the employment land review
buildings upon findings from previous sections of the report.
11.1 Conclusions
Office (B1a) Land Use
Our forecasting exercise estimated that there is additional demand up to 2031 for between
30,950 sqm and 99,350 sqm of office floorspace in LB Croydon. The majority of this demand
is for office space in the CMC. This demand is due in large part to the expected realisation of
masterplans, providing B1 floorspace within the CMC Opportunity Area, and the rebranding
and re-positioning of Croydon as envisaged in its Economic Development Strategy and Vision.
Our property market analysis indicates that the CMC office market typically caters for
headquarter companies and large companies seeking a key location within the wider
SLFPMA. These occupiers are generally prepared to pay higher rents and with a wider
market, and potentially supplier and workforce catchment area. There is a strong presence
here of occupiers involved in public administration, financial and business services and
engineering/construction..
The CMC is a highly accessible location, where businesses have access to a large workforce
catchment area and to central London. Initiatives such as the extension of the East London
Line, the proposed masterplans and rebranding of the CMC are expected to have a positive
economic effect on the demand for office stock and the council should therefore plan spatially
to accommodate this demand in appropriate locations.
Consultations, analysis of the property market and policy evidence indicate that Croydon
contains a high proportion of older office stock, which once vacant proves difficult to re-let
given that characteristics may no longer appeal to modern occupiers. It is thus important that a
measured approach is taken to encouraging refurbishment or site redevelopment to provide
modern floorspace.
In addition to the presence of larger occupiers in the CMC area there is localised B1a
floorspace demand from SMEs. The local office market in Croydon contains a range of small
premises accommodated mainly within town/district centres, such as Purley, Coulsdon,
Norbury and Upper Norwood. There is presently some vacancy within this ‘local’ market,
which consultations and property market analysis have deduced largely to be a result of the
economic downturn or, in some cases, the quality of stock. There has been a fall in supply in
some centres recently, particularly Norbury, owing to development pressure from higher value
land uses.
Although premises in the local market are generally considered to be adequate to meet the
need of SMEs, consultations have indicated that there is some demand for newer, better
quality, premises. In addition, there is anticipated to be some new demand for small office
units generated by Croydon’s drive to be an ‘enterprising borough’. It is noted however that
some of the ‘local’ demand for office space would likely be met by available floorspace within
the CMC, due to its strong borough-wide accessibility, comparatively low rental prices, and
wider range of amenities.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 140
49353249
Industrial (B1b/c, B2 and B8) Land Use
There is a total of 180.7 ha of land currently in industrial use in LB Croydon, with total
industrial floorspace estimated to be in the region of 836,000 sqm. Our forecast shows that
there is projected to be a slight decline in demand for industrial land in the period 2011 to
2031 for the lower and medium scenarios. Factors such as the expected increase in demand
for waste and recycling land and the need to retain an appropriate level of ‘frictional’ vacant
land need to be taken into consideration.
On the supply-side, our qualitative appraisal of employment clusters, and property market
analysis, indicate that, as a whole, the current supply of industrial premises is considered to be
appropriate for the needs of occupiers in the borough and will continue to attract interest from
new occupiers, owing to such characteristics as good strategic road access and proximity to
markets. Although there are many strongly performing areas such as Purley Way South and
Marlpit Lane, some employment areas, and pockets of unallocated industrial land, have issues
such as poor servicing arrangements, poor quality of premises and environment or are
accessed via residential areas, and thus do not perform as well as they might within the
strategic context.
Given the need to retain industrial land to cater for the factors mentioned above, and the
generally strong performance of UDP employment areas, it is considered inappropriate to
recommend the release of allocated employment land in the borough over the LDF plan
period.
There are however areas of UDP designated industrial employment land which could benefit
from intensification, in order to provide a supply of new, modern premises (particularly to
accommodate SMEs), improve the quality of public realm and lessen impacts on neighbouring
sensitive uses. Employment clusters in New Addington and Fieldway are close to areas of
deprivation and provide redevelopment and intensification which could stimulate local
regeneration.
The qualitative survey identified that a number of sites within both strategic and local
employment clusters have been developed in recent years for non-B class land uses. These
include retail, trade-counter, car dealerships and other sui-generis uses. If this trend is allowed
to continue unchecked then employment areas may become further eroded, as developers
may seek to take advantage of precedents set by neighbouring site owners.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 141
49353249
11.2 Proposed Policy Direction
As per the Government’s guidance notes on Employment Land Reviews (ODPM 2004), the
below recommendations for employment land focus on suitability of employment clusters for
the B use class sectors drawing upon comprehensive research and analysis undertaken
through previous sections.
Table 10.4 showed that the maximum development potential of B1a office floorspace tier 1
and tier 2 priority sites in the CMC is significantly larger than the planning period forecast for
office floorspace. However, figures presented in Table 10.4 do not account for other uses such
as retail, residential and leisure uses. It is not within the scope of this research to recommend
alternative land uses for clusters or sites, nor indicate the appropriate mix of uses or storey
height. As such recommendations do not comment on the suitability of CMC clusters for
residential and supporting uses, such as retail and community uses.
It is understood that the Council has recently commissioned a housing typology study, which
will inform strategic planning for housing across the CMC, and an assessment of the creative
and cultural sector in LB Croydon, which is considered to be a potential growth sector. When
developing recommendations for housing provision and business accommodation to support
the creative and cultural sector, the Council should consider the recommendations and
justifications set out below for the designation, retention and intensification of employment
areas.
The recommendations come in the format of a recommendation and then supporting
justification and rationale. The recommendations are presented around the following themes:
a. CMC Office Uses (B1a): Promotion of new, higher density office floorspace (as part of
mixed use developments) in central locations of the CMC which are marketable and
developable. These sites, some of which are located within the proposal boundaries of
masterplans, offer the potential to deliver B1a office floorspace as part of mixed use
developments and reinvigorate Croydon’s urban realm. Their locations within the CMC,
among other things, offer opportunities for business to access an efficient transport
network, access a wide travel to work catchment area with a diverse and skilled labour
market and market, and lower rental values than central London.
b. Local Office (B1a): Encouragement of B1a office floorspace within district, town and
local centres.
c. Industrial Uses (B1b/c, B2 and B8): Protection of industry and warehousing uses
across the borough for B1b/c, B2 and B8 use to limit the loss of land and floorspace
within these clusters to non-employment land use, including the sui-generis use class.
d. Monitoring of Employment Land: Monitoring of take up and loss of employment land
across the borough, with specific attention to non-B class employment use classes.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 142
49353249
CMC Office Uses (B1a)
Our analysis set out in Section 10, within Table 10.1 and 10.3 forms the basis of our CMC B1a
cluster recommendations.
R1 Promote B1a office development in the CMC within tier 1 priority clusters:
Tier 1 priority clusters
• CMC 2b - East Croydon Masterplan Area (West)
• CMC 4a - College Green Masterplan (North of College Road)
• CMC 10a- George Street and Lansdowne Rd (Dingwall Road)
• CMC 10b- George Street and Landsdowne Rd (George Street)
Tier 2 priority sites, having characteristics highly suitable to office development, should
also be the focus of promotion by the Council:
Tier 2 priority clusters
• CMC 2a- East Croydon Masterplan Area (East)
• CMC 13 - Cross Road
• CMC 3b - Mid Croydon Masterplan (Katherine Street to Park Street)
• CMC 3a - Mid Croydon Masterplan (North of Park Street)
Justification
The high scenario forecast for office floorspace over the planning period in the CMC is
estimated to be 92,850 sqm. Our analysis finds that tier 1 and tier 2 priority sub-clusters hold
the greatest potential to accommodate office development over the short to longer term, as
per the characteristics set out in Section 10.1, and analysis of clusters presented in Table
10.1.
Accessibility to central London, client and labour force markets are a key determinant of
occupier preference and demand, and all tier 1 and tier 2 clusters are in close proximity to
East Croydon Station, being located around George Street, Dingwall Road and Wellesley
Road. The site survey and property market assessment identified these locations to be the
most marketable: locations of high accessibility; strong demand characteristics such as high
take take-up rates, rental values, footfall and visibility; and lowest low rates of vacancy. Other
roads with display high levels of marketability are Landsdowne Road, Sydenham Road,
Bedford Park, Park Street and Road Katherine Street.
Any office space arising through the pipeline should be taken into account when planning for
office provision. There are three sites in the pipeline which have planning permission which
could bring forward over 50,000 sqm – meeting over half of the high demand floorspace
scenario. The proposal at 28-30 Addiscombe Road is highlighted by agents Stiles Harold
Williams as a site which could come forward in the short term and leverage further interest in
the CMC. It is suggested that the Council support this and other pipeline proposals.
The tier 1 and tier 2 priority clusters also have significant potential to improve the business
environment, impact positively upon the urban landscape of Croydon, and tackle negative
impressions and perceptions of place. The LOPR, local policy documents, consultation and
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 143
49353249
property market assessment all highlight image and perception of Croydon as a constraint to
attracting inward investment. East Croydon is key entry point for arrivals to the borough, yet
the local public realm is average/poor (exacerbated by vacant land/buildings and outmoded,
old office stock. Tier 1 and tier 2 cluster include three masterplans which have the potential to
ensure that the public realm is prioritised. The Council should therefore act to target high
profile developments such as the tier 1 priority cluster East Croydon (West).
The Council should work with developers, businesses and stakeholders to promote the
development of tier 1 and tier 2 clusters listed above. The Council should advise on the need
for a suitable quantum of new grade A quality B1a office floorspace within these sub-clusters.
Local B1a Office
R2 The Council should seek to encourage the retention of office (B1a) floorspace in
District Centres (as defined by the London Plan).
Justification
VOA data records just 130,000 sqm of B1a floorspace outside of the CMC, across the
borough (17% of total stock). Site surveys substantiated the lack of office floorspace within
many district, town and local centres typically ad hoc and small scale in provision. Demand for
office space outside the CMC is forecast to remain static or see slight growth. Purley,
Coulsdon and Upper Norwood are considered to have characteristics (such as accessibility,
development potential and marketability characteristics, as per Section 10.1 and Table 10.2),
which make them more favourable locations to consolidate demand for local office floorspace.
Broadly, the residential market has been more buoyant than the employment land use market
in the past 10 years, which has led to an erosion of potential sites within district, town and
local centres (e.g. Norbury – loss of office floorspace in recent years and development
opportunities to non B-class development). District centres play an important role for occupiers
of the local property market area many of which are SMEs. However we have not found any
substantive evidence of market failure or reasons why some loss of offices to other uses is not
acceptable.
The Council should encourage, but not protect, the retention of office space in district centres,
particularly in Purley and Coulsdon, to ensure a critical mass of employment floorspace
remains in centres. This would also help to support the Council’s vision for ‘neighbourhood’
enterprise and protect local employment opportunities and tackle localised deprivation.
R3 The Council should seek to encourage office (B1a) and light industry use (B1b/c
and B2) floorspace in Upper Norwood, which support creative (and cultural) industries.
Justification
Upper Norwood was identified in site surveys to have a small but established presence of
creative industries. Creative industries require premises which cut across B1b/c and B2 use
classes. They are known to benefit from agglomeration e.g. networks, locational advantages,
supply chain linkages, and suitable provision should be made to enable the sector to grow. In
a highly supply constrained district centre, this recommendation recognises the importance of
Upper Norwood for creative industries and seeks to encourage the provision of land uses to
help the sector consolidate and grow.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 144
49353249
Industrial Uses (B1b/c, B2 and B8)
R4 Protection of all clusters designated as Strategic Employment Areas and
Employment Areas, as per the adopted UDP, and the ‘Strategic Industrial Location’
(SIL) designation, as per the London Plan
All land and premises currently in B1 (a, b, or c), B2 and B8 land uses designated as Strategic
Employment Areas, Employment Areas and Strategic Industrial Locations should remain
designated or allocated for B1, B2 and B8 employment use only. Non-B use class, including
sui generis activities should not be allowed on designated SILs.
All vacant land and derelict premises should be retained for B1 (a, b, c), B2 and B8
development and not released for non-employment land use.
Justification
The mid-range forecast of -3.1ha represents a loss of 1.4% of total land stock. Over the 20
year planning period, 2011-2031, the fall of -1.4% is considered to be negligible compared to
the overall demand. The constrained nature of supply in the borough is recognised in the
GLA’s Industrial Capacity SPG (2008), which places Croydon in the ‘Restrictive Transfer’
category. This means the release of industrial land to other uses should be restricted wherever
possible to land that becomes inherently unsuitable for employment uses, due to
environmental degradation, or unacceptable impacts on surrounding land uses.
Our analysis found low rates of vacant and derelict land - just 2% (6.4ha) of land surveyed.
Vacant and derelict land located on established employment areas offers the potential to
accommodate any employment demand and any loss of this developable land to non-
employment uses would erode the borough’s capacity to adapt to and accommodate future
business requirements, across the borough or specifically within the cluster.
Our survey found that Strategic Employment Areas are the most suitable locations for
accommodating industrial uses, given their site characteristics, low levels of vacancy and the
range of premises within them, and which can accommodate the needs of most modern
occupiers. Other Employment Areas, though more mixed in character, were also generally
well occupied and contain several important local centres for accommodating SMEs.
R5 As per policy EM5 of the existing UDP, allow unallocated sites to remain
protected by ensuring that release to non-industrial uses only occurs where;
• ‘The existing use materially harms residential amenity; and
• It has been demonstrated that there is no demand for an appropriate alternative
employment use; and
• The proposal is for housing or a community use; and
• The proposed use would not prejudice the continued use of adjacent
employment sites.’
Justification
Industrial and warehousing uses outside the designated Employment Areas provide residents
with the opportunity to live and work locally, and contribute significantly to the economic health
of the Borough. As such it is important for the Council to protect these sites from loss, unless
certain beneficial conditions are met. Policy EM5, as per the UDP, has been slightly amended
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 145
49353249
with the word ‘or’ being replaced by the word ‘and’ at the end of the first bullet. This
strengthens the conditions for the protection of unallocated employment land.
Specifically, three sites which are not Strategic Employment Areas or Employment Areas were
surveyed:
• C9 - Bensham Grove
• C10 - Hastings Road (Harris & Bailey Site); and
• C11 - Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site).
These three clusters remain unallocated employment clusters and as unallocated sites are
protected under this recommendation. The recommendation has also been made in the
context of a projected slight decline in industry/warehousing land (as per the mid-range
scenario of – 1.8ha) over the planning period.
R6 Feasibility study to assess the potential for Cane Hill to accommodate a zero-
carbon technology park, with start up and grow on space for B1a/b/c land uses, as part
of a wider mixed-use masterplan.
Justification
Cane Hill, comprising the former Cane Hill Hospital Site and its grounds has approximately
4ha of developable land which could accommodate B-use class employment. There are
several protected buildings remaining, though the rest of the site is empty/cleared or greenfield
land (the southern end of which is designated as a ‘site of importance for nature
conservation’). Topography will also impact on the location and scale of development
potential.
There are a number of factors which support the suitability for Cane Hill as a site for start up
and growing businesses at this location:
• Good strategic road access with direct links to the A23.
• Adjacent to Coulsdon, the northern most end of the site has better access to District
centre facilities and amenities and the railway station
• Environmental setting offering prospects to create a high quality landscaped setting
• The scale of site with large areas empty/cleared offers prospects for sensitive
masterplanning
• Office premises, which have similar locational characteristics as science and research
premises, are forecast to grow
• Science and technology/research activities require a pool of highly qualified and
skilled workers. The socio-economic characteristics of the borough indicate that the
resident workforce and London residents, broadly considered to live within the travel
to work catchment area, have comparatively high attainments levels (NVQ3 plus) to
Great Britain, and a higher proportion of managers and senior officials; professional
occupation; and associate professional & technical occupations.
However issues include potential diversion of demand away from Croydon town centre. This
could be avoided by targeted the site for niche activities such as a zero-carbon technology
park. The case for such an activity does not though appear to have been developed. We
recommend that a feasibility study is carried out to investigate the market demand and viability
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 146
49353249
for a zero-carbon innovation park. It should test market demand by sector, business size and
lifecycle (that is start up, growing and mature businesses). It should also consider how other
forms of development could be provided for alongside, such as residential and leisure. The
feasibility study should place the site in the context of an appropriate property market area,
rather than demand in Croydon.
R7 Promote the provision of start-up and grow-on units for light-industry/storage
and distribution use classes, within the following UDP designated employment areas:
• C2B - Purley Way North (Progress Way/ Commerce Way)
• C2C - Purley Way North (North of Tramlink Bridge)
• C2D - Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area)
• C4 - Union Road
• C8A - Marlpit Lane - West of A23
Justification
Research identified a deficiency in the provision of start up units. Croydon’s Vision and
Economic Development Strategy seek to promote the hub if the borough as ‘the Enterprising
City’ with the aspiration to raise enterprise start up, the number of growing business and
retention rates. Since 2007, key initiatives such as LEGI have supported these aspirations and
sought to raise entrepreneurship as a way of tackling economic deprivation.
The clusters identified above offer characteristics which could accommodate B1b/c, B2 and B8
SME unit provision and help to support local, organic economic growth and tackle deprivation.
See section 5.4 and in particular Table 5.10 ‘Employment Clusters with potential to
accommodate SME Workspace’.
R8 Promote improved estate management at the following Strategic Employment
Areas / Employment Areas, with the intention of encouraging redevelopment and
intensification of land use, and improving environmental quality:
• C2D - Purley Way North (Mill Lane Area)
• C6A - Selsdon Road (North)
• C6B - Selsdon Road (Central)
• C7 - Vulcan Way
Also promote improved land management at non-UDP designated C11 - Land at Warren
Road (Aggregates Site), to improve environmental quality and interface with
neighbouring uses.
Justification
We believe there is scope to encourage redevelopment of B-use class in those Strategic
Employment Areas and Employment Areas listed above, through improved estate
management.
The five clusters total 16.8ha of employment land. Site surveys observed areas of poor quality
stock (at Purley Way North and Selsdon Road [north]), and vacant and derelict land (1.7ha at
Selsdon Road [central] and Vulcan Way). Two of these sites are considered to have bad
neighbourhood uses. As per criteria set out in 10.1 and the assessment in Table 10.3, these
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 147
49353249
sites are considered to be best able to accommodate additional demand in industrial and
warehousing, through new build, redevelopment and intensification.
Examples of recent, successful B1b/c, B2 and B8 redevelopment within the borough include
Commerce Park Way and Selsdon Road South, which provide evidence of demand.
Enhancement of the provision through redevelopment and intensification would support PPS4
objective that vacant/underused land should be better utilised.
The main use at C11 - Land at Warren Road (Aggregates Site), is involved with recycling of
aggregates site. It is well used with good quality, structures and the owners have undertaken
junction improvements to accommodate their HGVs. Though the south eastern boundaries of
the site do not generate bad neighbour impacts and are well segmented from any residential
land use, there is a conflict of uses at the access point, which it shares with Purley Rail station,
and better segregation between the uses is required.
Monitoring of Employment Land
R9 Monitoring development and occupancy in all Strategic Employment Areas and
Employment Areas
The Council should monitor of take up and development, including intensification, of land and
premises across all employment areas within the borough - Strategic Employment Areas and
Employment Areas, as per the adopted UDP, and the ‘Strategic Industrial Locations’, as per
the London Plan. Monitoring will ensure that the correct land uses come forward and sufficient
land is available for economic growth.
Justification
Site surveys observed that employment areas have become eroded by non-B use class uses
(Table 5.11 lists those with a ‘significant presence’). This erosion impacts on the potential
capacity a location has to accommodate employment uses, management capability and
vitality. Evidence supports the need for close monitoring of planning applications, particularly
of employment land and/or premises designed as per the UDP. The borough should adopt a
monitoring mechanism to assess, regularly, all planning applications coming forward for
development and occupation, and any changes in quantum and use class.
Within employment clusters, site surveys observed a significant, recent take up of land by self-
storage businesses. In considering permission for these uses, the Council should reflect upon
UDP policy EM2 which states the need ‘to generate employment which is quantitatively and
qualitatively comparable to uses within those classes’. Though not classified as sui-generis,
we suggest that the Council monitor the take up of self-storage land use on UDP-designated
employment areas and consider, on an annual basis, whether this land use is bringing about
any erosion to the quantum and quality of employment.
The information captured in the survey process and listed in Table X and Table X, which
provides a list of vacant and derelict land/ derelict, is a good basis from which to begin the
record of monitoring loss and could be used to update the Councils monitoring database.
The Council should therefore continue to monitor the take up of land and premises across all
UDP designated Employment Areas and across SILs. Monitoring will ensure the correct type
of land use comes forward and that sufficient land is available for economic growth.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 148
49353249
The Council should look to update the planning applications database, if required. Critically, to
ensure equilibrium between land demand and supply, it is recommended that planning
applications do not contradict the proposed recommendations set out in this review.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 149
49353249
Appendix A – Employment Cluster
Questionnaire
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 150
49353249
Employment Cluster Survey Questionnaire
Business Cluster Number (URS): Your Initials: ……… Date:
List any London Plan SIL and/or UDP Employment use Allocation and/ or Site Proposals (desk based)………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The business premises typologies in the cluster are best described as (multiple ticks possible):
� Business district � Waste mgmt / Recycling / environmental industrial sites
� General Industrial estate / business areas � Town centre
� Warehouse / distribution Park / wholesale � Incubator / SME cluster
� Local shopping centre � Local Office Centre
� High quality Business Park. � Local Office Centre
� Storage � Car Repairs
� Other (describe any other uses)…………………………………………………………………………………………….…………
What is/are the main employment and/or other significant land-use/s?
(Mark land uses on map using key in manual)
Mark clearly and precisely any revisions to cluster boundaries on the map (see manual instructions).
Character of premises within Cluster
(Mark on the survey base map the boundaries of distinct areas of premises character within the cluster using key in manual)
Quality of environment and public realm
� Very good
� Good
� Poor
� Very poor
Access to facilities and amenities
� Very good � Good � Poor � Very poor
Comment on quality of environment
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 151
49353249
Topography issues
� Yes
� No
Ecological issues
� Yes � No
Bad neighbourhood uses Businesses in the business cluster cause:
� None
� Noise pollution
� Air pollution
� Smell
� HGV traffic
� Significant car traffic
� Other (please comment)
Physical site constraints in cluster? (i.e. access from local road, layout issues, incompatible land use, environmental/nature conservation)
Comment (and mark on map)……………………………………………………………………………………………
The cluster lies within close proximity to / has impact on (multiple answers possible)
� Residential or Community uses
� Town centre
� Local shopping centre � Other…………………………………………………..
Servicing of businesses in cluster
(multiple answers possible)
� Road side loading/unloading
� Off road loading/unloading
� Loading bays
Servicing is adequate for the uses within the cluster � Yes � No � Don’t know
If yes, comment on topography and illustrate on map
Comments
If yes, comments on ecology and illustrate on map
Comment on servicing of businesses
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 152
49353249
Parking facilities
(multiple answers possible)
� Dedicated parking within cluster
� On street parking
� Yellow / double yellow lines
� Red route
� Controlled parking zone/paid parking
Parking provision is: � Adequate � Too little � Too much � Don’t
know
Strategic road access (trunk roads) (Observation and desk based)………….……….…………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Access to public transport (Observation and desk based PTAL check)……………….………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Condition of Buildings - % of buildings within Cluster in:
Very Good % / Good % / Poor % / Very Poor %
Total vacant and available B1/B2/B8 floorspace quantum actively marketed within cluster
B1 ….……… B2 ……….… B8 ……..… (Sqm)
(Take note of any property market agent information on vacant and available floorspace and specification)
Are there any Vacant developable sites/ Derelict buildings within cluster
(Y/N):………….….If yes mark clearly on map. What % of the cluster land area do they constitute? .……. %
Has any part of the Cluster been redeveloped in the past ten years for residential/ mixed uses? Or other uses other than those covered by the B use class sectors? (Y/N)…………. If yes mark on map
Comment on parking facilities give reason for judgment on adequacy
of parking provision
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 153
49353249
Are any areas within the cluster suitable for adaptation into workspace suitable for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)?
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Does the cluster contain a notable presence of high-growth sector occupiers? (Y/N) ……
If yes please name…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Additional possibilities for intensification / redevelopment (Mark clearly on the cluster map, any areas which show potential for intensification and add any additional comments below)
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Photographs
Image number(s) / / / / (min. of 1 image per cluster)
General description of cluster / comments on business cluster
Always describe business cluster, and include any comments you have.
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 154
49353249
Appendix B – Croydon Metropolitan Centre
Questionnaire
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 155
49353249
Croydon Metropolitan Centre Office Capacity Assessment Survey
Date Surveyor Site Identifier Site number
Identification of site boundary CHECK AND REDRAW AS NECCESSARY
Mixed use or single use MIXED SINGLE
Description of any current uses / activity (sector use - predominant - from visual observation) OFFICE RETAIL LEISURE COMM LIGHT IND RESI
% ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______
PREDOMINANT SECTOR (BROADLY - See end of q’aire) #
Availability (visual observation, estimate where possible, to check w. SHW) YES NO
%
Quality of stock (visual inspection) VG G P VP
AGE (IF POSSIBLE) 2000+ 1980 to 1999 1960 to 1979 PRE-1960
Plot ratio / building footprint * CURRENT % POTENTIAL %
Are there site specific physical constraints or is there an usual plot size?
Storeys (Average or site specific)* CURRENT # SURROUNDING RANGE # POTENTIAL #
Also to be checked through desk based policy review
Boundary notes / surrounding uses BAD NEIGHBOUR Y N EXPLAIN
TOPOGRAPHIC Y N
ECOLOGICAL Y N
PTAL (desk based)
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 156
49353249
DESK BASED
Parking and Servicing CURRENT: VG G P VP
POTENTIAL: VG G P VP
COMMENT
Access to town centre amenities VG G P VP
Quality of public realm in the area VG G P VP
Physical or policy constraints on or adjacent to the site POLICY: DESK BASED PHYSICAL: COMMENT / IDENTIFY ON MAP
Evidence of single or multiple ownership SINGLE MULTIPLE
Evidence of market activity * COMMENT
Overall comment
• AGRICULTURE, HUNTING AND FORESTRY B FISHING
• MINING AND QUARRYING
• MANUFACTURING
• ELECTRICITY, GAS AND WATER SUPPLY
• CONSTRUCTION
• WHOLESALE AND RETAIL TRADE
• REPAIR OF MOTOR VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLES AND PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD GOODS
• HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS
• TRANSPORT
• STORAGE
• COMMUNICATION (Tourist offices; Radio and tv transmission)
• FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION (Banking, finance and insurance)
• BUSINESS ACTIVITIES (Business services; Dealing in real estate, Research & development; Other services)
• CREATIVE AND CULTURAL ACTIVITIES
• REAL ESTATE, RENTING
• PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEFENCE; COMPULSORY SOCIAL SECURITY
• EDUCATION
• HEALTH AND SOCIAL WORK
• OTHER COMMUNITY, SOCIAL & PERSONAL SERVICE ACTIVITIES
• EXTRA - TERRITORIAL ORGANISATIONS AND BODIES
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 157
49353249
Appendix C – Consultation Topics
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 158
49353249
Consultation on Employment Land
The stakeholder consultations covered the following topics
Aims of the Organisation
Q. Please tell me about what your organisation does. What types of businesses do you represent
/ work for (by size, sector, products / services, growth phase)?
• Aims/ objectives of organisation:
• Area of expertise / representation:
• Size (employment)
• Sector
• Product / service
• Growth phase (pre-start, start-up, growth, mature)
• Geography (area of representation)
Commercial and Industrial Premises
Q. In terms of quality, price and availability what do you think of the current stock of commercial /
industrial properties? (If possible, comment on office stock in Croydon Metropolitan Centre and
the smaller local town and district centres, and Industrial)
• Quality (incl age)
• Size
• Availability and leasing (flex / short term / long term)
• Price (incl. vfm)
• Geography
Q. In terms of business accommodation, do you think the current stock of commercial / industrial
sites and premises meets business needs? (Consider those business located in the borough and
inward investment enquiries). How does it fall short?
• Major employers
• Small company requirements
Q. In terms of accommodation, are there any particular areas in the borough which fall short of
meeting business needs?
• Where? And what do they fall short on?
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 159
49353249
Q. Are there any factors which constrain or act as a barrier to growth? Consider business already located in Croydon and inward investment?
Q. Accommodation (e.g. size of units [grow-on or expansion space], type [flexible, age of
stock, location], technical requirements [consider specific sectors e.g. creative/cultural],
parking provision and servicing)
• Transport / Infrastructure / Access (to workforce, markets, suppliers, etc)
• Workforce (access to good staff, skills, training, education levels)
• Environment (economic and community e.g. education, housing, parks, crime)
• Costs (affordability) / Access to finance / Business support
• Other (e.g. Image/ perceptions of place)
Q. What are the advantages to businesses of being located in the Borough of Croydon?
(Consider: proximity to markets, suppliers, rates / costs, availability of land / sites / space,
local labour, communications, transport, housing, environment, etc)
Q. Which locations have higher levels of demand? What type of sites and premises are in
demand? What is driving demand for these sites / premises and locations? Are there enough
to satisfy? (consider CMC and local and district centres, and sites/premises for SME / larger
employers)
Workforce and Economic Inclusion
Q. Can you comment on the workforce situation in the Borough of Croydon? E.g. is the local
skill-set appropriate/ adequate.
Q. Is it difficult to recruit staff (differentiate between highly skilled and less skilled)? If yes,
why?
Q. What programmes or initiatives are in place or planned for to tackle workforce related
issues? What are the objectives of these programme / initiatives ?
Policies
Q. What kind of projects, policies, strategies would improve the commercial property situation
in the Borough of Croydon?
Economic Outlook
Q. What impact do you think the economic downturn has had on the employment land
property market? What is the outlook over the short term / longer term?
Q. How should policy makers respond to the economic challenges?
Regeneration and Investment
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 160
49353249
Q. There are a number of developments which have recently come forward or a planned or
proposed. These include the East London Line extension; masterplans for the CMC; and
expansion of Gatwick Airport. How will these impact on the commercial and industrial property
markets in LB Croydon? (Consider separately and other factors mentioned)
e.g. East London Line
Masterplans (Gateway site, College Green, Mid-Croydon, Wellesley Road)
AOB
Is there anything else that you think is important with regards to properties in the Borough of
Croydon?
LB Croydon Office, Industrial, Warehousing Land/ Premises Market Assessment Final Report
August 2010 Page 161
49353249