long-term ionospheric anomaly monitor (ltiam) overview
TRANSCRIPT
Long-term Ionospheric Anomaly Monitor(LTIAM)
Overview
ICAO ISTF/516 – 18 February, 2015
Threat: Severe Ionosphere Disturbances
2
11/20/2003, 20:15:00 UT
• Ionosphere spatial gradients as large as 412 mm/km have been observed in the United States since April 2000.
• A worst-case ionospheric threat model was developed for LAAS in CONUS based on study of about 10 severe days.
Front Speed
Airplane Speed
Width
LAAS Ground Facility
SlopeLGF IPP
Limitations of the CAT I LAAS Ionospheric Anomaly Threat Model
3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Elevation [deg]
Slop
e [m
m/k
m]
Dual-frequency and L1 CMC verifiedL1 CMC
Flat 425 mm/kmLinear bound (mm/km):y = 375 + 50(el - 15)/50Flat 375
mm/km
• CAT I Ionospheric Anomaly Threat Model
• Limitations:– Constructed based on a small number of ionospheric storm events– Receiver separations within the CORS network (typically 40 – 100
km) do not reflect the LAAS architecture
S. Datta-Barua, J. Lee, et.al., (2010). Ionospheric Threat Parameterization for Local Area Global-Positioning-System-Based Aircraft Landing Systems . AIAA, the Journal of Aircraft.
Need of Long-Term Ionospheric Anomaly (LTIA) Monitor
4
• Long-term ionospheric anomaly monitoring is needed to build an Ionospheric threat model, monitor ionospheric anomalies over the system life cycle, verify CAT I threat model, and trigger updates if needed.
Ionospheric Threat Space with Newly Validated Ionospheric Anomalies
5
Newly Verified AnomaliesThreat points in the current threat model
All 10 severe days of data from
the CONUSionospheric
storm archive were processed
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Elevation [deg]
Slop
e [m
m/k
m]
Flat 375mm/km
Linear bound (mm/km):y = 375 + 50(el - 15)/50 Flat 425 mm/km
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Elevation [deg]
Slop
e [m
m/k
m]
Flat 375mm/km
Linear bound (mm/km):y = 375 + 50(el - 15)/50 Flat 425 mm/km
Overview of LTIA Monitor
6
LTIA Monitor Inputs
•External Data-Space weather databases (Dst, Kp)
•GPS Observation Data
LTIA Monitor Outputs
• Manual Validation (MV)- Re-examination of potential anomalies output
LTIA Monitor Processing
•Ionospheric Event Search (IES)-Select periods and areas deserving further study
•Ionospheric Delay/Gradient Estimation (IDGE)-Process ionospheric data of interest
•Ionospheric Anomaly Candidate Screening (IACS)
• Periodic Report- Processor statistics- Manual validation results- Ionospheric statistics
• Safety Assessment- Follow-up as needed
Data Collection Processing
Ionospheric Anomaly Search Processor Reporting
Automated Procedures
Manual Procedures
Overview of LTIA Monitor
7
LTIA Monitor Inputs
•External Data-Space weather databases (Dst, Kp)
•GPS Observation Data
LTIA Monitor Outputs
• Manual Validation (MV)- Re-examination of potential anomalies output
LTIA Monitor Processing
•Ionospheric Event Search (IES)-Select periods and areas deserving further study
•Ionospheric Delay/Gradient Estimation (IDGE)-Process ionospheric data of interest
•Ionospheric Anomaly Candidate Screening (IACS)
• Periodic Report- Processor statistics- Manual validation results- Ionospheric statistics
• Safety Assessment- Follow-up as needed
Data Collection Processing
Ionospheric Anomaly Search Processor Reporting
Automated Procedures
Manual Procedures
Internal Processing
8
Internal Processing
Iono. Event Search
• Search for periods/areas of interest
• Automated daily processing
• Event selection criteria
Iono. Delay & Gradient
Estimation
• Create “simple truth” data using dual-frequency data
• Estimate iono. gradients using station-pair method
Iono. Anomaly
Candidate Screening
• Search for unusually large gradients (e.g., > 300 mm/km)
• Automated screening to remove receiver faults, data errors
Kp >Kp_th
Dst <Dst_th
Overview of LTIA Monitor
9
LTIA Monitor Inputs
•External Data-Space weather databases (Dst, Kp)
•GPS Observation Data
LTIA Monitor Outputs
• Manual Validation (MV)- Re-examination of potential anomalies output
LTIA Monitor Processing
•Ionospheric Event Search (IES)-Select periods and areas deserving further study
•Ionospheric Delay/Gradient Estimation (IDGE)-Process ionospheric data of interest
•Ionospheric Anomaly Candidate Screening (IACS)
• Periodic Report- Processor statistics- Manual validation results- Ionospheric statistics
• Safety Assessment- Follow-up as needed
Data Collection Processing
Ionospheric Anomaly Search Processor Reporting
Automated Procedures
Manual Procedures
Manual Validation
• Validate that the observed events are actually due to the ionosphere and not receiver faults or data errors using L1-only measurement
10
20 20.5 21 21.5 22-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Time (hour of 11/20/2003)
Iono
Slo
pe (m
m/k
m)
Comparison of Slopes, ZOB1 and GARF, SVN 38
DF SlopeL1 CMC Slope
Example of LTIAM Plots for Anomaly Candidate (Brazilian TM Study: SAVO-SSA1 PRN 21)
ICAO ISTF/50 5 10 15 20 25
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Hour of Day (UT)
Ele
vatio
n (d
egre
es)
SAVO-SSA1 Elevation Angle of PRN21
SAVOSSA1
20 21 22 23 24
0
100
200
300
400X: 23.86Y: 459.6
Hour of Day (UT)
Slo
pe(m
m/k
m)
SAVO-SSA1PRN21 (dist=9.97km)
21 21.5 22 22.5 23 23.5 24
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
X: 23.86Y: 3.201
Hour of Day (UT)
Sla
nt Io
nosp
heric
Del
ay (m
)SAVO-SSA1 ... PRN21
SAVOSSA1
20 21 22 23 24-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Hour of Day (UT)
Slo
pe (m
m/k
m)
Manual Validation SAVO-SSA1 (9.97 km) PRN21
I
ICMC
501.2 mm/km
11
Distribution of LTIAM software tool
• Version 2.1 was made available to IGWG participating members (2012)
• The same version of the tool and supporting documents are available to the ISTF group members (an approval from FAA is obtained) – LTIAM-2.1 (zip file)
– LTIAM Algorithm Description Doc v2.1
– LTIAM User Manual v2.0
• Application form for LTIAM software package
12
References
• “User Manual for the Long-Term Ionospheric Anomaly (LTIA) Monitoring of the Ground-Based Augmentation System,” KAIST, Version 2.0, June 20, 2012
• “Algorithm Description Document and User Manual for Long-Term IonosphericAnomaly Monitor (LTIAM) of the Local Area Augmentation System,” Tetra Tech AMT, Inc., Stanford University, KAIST, Version 2.1, August 13, 2012.
• S. Jung and J. Lee, “Long Term Ionospheric Anomaly Monitoring for Ground Based Augmentation Systems.” Radio Sci., 47, RS4006, July 2012, doi:10.1029/2012RS005016.
• J. Lee, S. Jung, M. Kim, J. Seo, S. Pullen, and S. Close, “Results from Automated Ionospheric Data Analysis for Ground-Based Augmentation Systems,” Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation International Technical Meeting (ION ITM 2012), Newport Beach CA, January, 2012
• J. Lee, S. Jung, and S. Pullen, “Enhancements of Long Term Ionospheric Anomalies Monitoring for the Ground-Based Augmentation System,” Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation International Technical Meeting (ION ITM 2011), San Diego, CA, January 24-26, 2011
• J. Lee, S. Jung, E. Bang, S. Pullen, and P. Enge, “Long Term Monitoring of Ionospheric Anomalies to Support the Local Area Augmentation System,” Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION-GNSS 2010), Portland, OR, September 2010.
13