love food hate waste 10 cities campaign cardiff report€¦ · love food hate waste pull-up banners...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Love Food Hate Waste
10 Cities Campaign
Cardiff Report
Author: Luke Rice
Data & Additional Words: Lia Moutselou & Rebecca Clark Photos: Dan Green & Project Team
Date: 25/03/15
2
Contents
Background: Page 3
Aim: Page 3
Objectives: Page 3
Roadshows: Page 4
Workshops: Page 5
Results: Pages 6 - 8
Conclusion: Page 8
Annex: Pages 9 - 16
3
Background
Food waste is a huge global problem and the Cardiff is no exception. Around 175,000 tonnes of
municipal waste was collected by Cardiff Council in 2012/13 of which around 18% was waste food.
Of this waste food it is estimated that up to 60% could have been avoided.
There are huge environmental, economic and social costs attributed to this wastage. In the UK
around 17 million tonnes of Co2e is associated with food waste and the BBC recently reported that
£610 million worth of food is wasted in Wales. There is also a social issue associated with food waste
and a ‘societal imbalance’ whereby some are struggling to feed themselves whilst others throw away
good food.
In late 2014 a consortium of organisations successfully applied for funding from WRAP to deliver a
series of activities as part of the Love Food Hate Waste - 10 Cities Campaign. The project was
overseen by Cynefin Cardiff, delivered by Green City Events, Lia’s Kitchen and Adamsdown
Environmental Action Group with support from Dan Green Photography, Cardiff Council and
numerous volunteers.
Aim
The aim of the project was to raise public awareness about the financial, environmental and social
issues associated with wasting food and to offer advice and guidance about how to reduce and avoid
food waste.
Objectives
1. The team planned to deliver two roadshow events and two intensive cookery workshops
between January and March 2015.
2. The events would take place in a variety of venues targeting different socio-economic
groups, as well as university students.
3. We aimed to reach 150 people at each roadshow and 15 people at each workshop.
4. The team would actively distribute information booklets as well as tools to help reduce food
waste. In addition, the activities would be heavily promoted through social media and the
public would be encouraged to download the LFHW mobile app.
5. The team would measure the impact of the workshops with a ‘before & after’ questionnaire.
4
Roadshows
The roadshows took place at Roath Farmers Market and at Cardiff Students’ Union. The aim of these
roadshows was to deliver short, sharp messages about the LFHW project to a large number of
people.
To encourage passers-by to engage with the roadshow, Lia’s Kitchen prepared soup tasters and small
portions of cake with recipe’s inspired by those featured on the LFHW webpage. Additionally, the
roadshow was designed to be attractive and interactive. Love Food Hate Waste pull-up banners and
bunting helped decorate the gazeebos and participants were encouraged to use a pedal powered
smoothie maker.
If people wanted to sample the food and take home the tools they had to make a pledge and have a
photo taken with a ‘pledge poster’ designed specifically for this project by Adamsdown
Environmental Action Group. With their agreement the photos were posted on social media, which
helped to generate more interest in the campaign.
Lastly, some of the traders at the Farmers Market informed us afterwards that they had seen an
increase in footfall and trade, which they attributed, in part, to the LFHW roadshow.
5
Workshops
The workshops took place at Roath Church House, Penylan and at the No Fit State Circus,
Adamsdown in February 2015. The events were extensively advertised through social media,
flyering, through the mainstream press and promoted at the Farmers Market roadshow.
As a result of the marketing campaign the first workshop sold out within two days and the second
sold out a week before delivery. In total 36 people booked tickets with 28 people turning up on the
day. Tickets were charged at £5 in order to better guarantee participation and all money raised will
be donated to a food charity.
Some tickets were kept aside and were offered to community development organisations and a
church group, in order to reserve places for people with less disposable income.
Prior to the workshops participants were sent a questionnaire asking them (amongst other things)
about their weekly food costs, how much food they disposed of and about their general awareness
of food waste issues. A week after the workshops they were sent a further questionnaire asking
similar questions. The results have been analysed and the headlines will be highlighted later in the
report.
6
Results
Roadshows
The roadshows were a big success and we managed to more than meet our targets in terms of
engagement. In total, we spoke to an estimated 170 people at the farmers market (despite the cold
and wet weather) and around 150 at the Students’ Union. Over 80 people agreed to be tweeted with
a pledge card at the two events which in turn generated significant interest in the campaign from a
wider audience.
In total we distributed:
Recipe cards: 292
Think green booklets: 70
Information handbooks: 17
Main ‘5 tips’ leaflets: 300
Think green posters: 51
Contact cards: 66
Spaghetti measures: 280
Bag clips: 400+
Lots of soup, cake and many smoothies!
7
Workshops
The workshops were well attended, excellently delivered and well received. There was significant
interest in lead up to the events on social media and in the press, with two articles reported in the
local newspaper. After the workshops some particularly interested participants wrote positive blogs
about their experiences.
The workshops were delivered in a professional yet relaxed manner and participants cooked dishes
whilst discussing the main issues associated with food waste (as well as the ways in which to avoid
waste). It was positive to see broad section of society represented with a variety of ages and income
levels attending. The meals cooked used ingredients which are commonly left over and wasted. To
finish off the workshop all the food was eaten collectively by the group. Lastly, all participants were
given a ‘goodie bag’ full of information and tools which would help them put in to practice what they
learnt at the event.
Headline findings:
30 pre-workshop survey responses and 22 post workshop responses.
Prior to the workshops the types of food that people stated they waste most per week were
salad, vegetables, fruit and bread.
Analysis showed an average reduction of 0.5 food waste bags per week post workshop.
The average participant saved over £30 on their weekly food shopping bill post workshop.
8
Fruit, vegetable, salad and bread remained the top types of food wasted but the percentage
of participants who reported wasting these food types more than halved after the
workshops.
The majority of participants (77.3%) used the advice and resources we provided them with
at the workshops.
Our pre-workshop survey recorded a good awareness of the LFHW campaign mainly through
social media, other sources (including our contacts list and mail outs) and the internet.
The week after the workshop participants told us they had a better idea on how to access
advice and information on how to save food (91%).
Half of the participants reported accessing the LFHW website and smart phone app post
event.
Many participants have cascaded information about the LFHW campaign and the tips &
resources we provided within their family and social circles. We estimate that it is likely that
our LFHW messages and our tips, delivered in the workshops, have reached over 160
people.
Conclusion
Overall this LFHW project has been a resounding success. We reached out to the amount of people
we intended to and many more people were made aware of the project through extensive use of
social media and a general cascading effect. Further positives include the fact that all the partners
received significant exposure as a result of this project and both Lia’s Kitchen and Green City Events
have been approached to deliver similar events in the future.
If we were to do anything differently we would have liked to have run some of the events at a
warmer time of year and to have linked in with some of the food festivals that take place in the city.
In addition, we would have liked to have used more unwanted/unused food in the cookery
workshops (perhaps donated by supermarkets). However, these are small points and generally all
partners are very pleased with how the project went and are grateful to have been offered the
opportunity to deliver such a worthwhile and rewarding project.
9
Annex
Workshop content and recipes
A pre-requisite of attendance for our workshops was the completion of a pre-workshop survey. This
helped shape and adapt the content of our workshop to the participants needs, in terms of the
recipes and group exercises incorporated in the programme.
The types of food that people told us they waste most per week (ranging from some small amount
to quite a lot) were salad, vegetables, fruit and bread. Whilst salad and vegetables were wasted by
most people (20 out of 33 participants and 17 out of 33 respectively), bread was the one food group
that was the food group that the highest number of people wasted quite a lot of.
When asked what type of advice participants wanted to learn about making most of leftovers (76%),
meal planning (54%) and better storage (42%). Participants also told us they wanted advice on
storing vegetables and fruit including which ones were most cost effective to buy and which had the
longer lifespans. They asked for portioning tools and measurers, tips and resources on freezing,
websites and smart phone Apps for finding recipes for specific ingredients.
10
In response, we designed and adapted four recipes for the workshops: Ribollita (re-boiled and
leftover vegetable soup), apple and pear cake, egg and banana pancakes and bread and butter
pudding. Ribollita was a soup that participants had to make with the ingredients and herbs available
to each group (four workshops per group). We also kept vegetable cuttings and some peelings,
including herb stems, which we then mixed with more herbs and divided into small stock making
bags that the participants took home to freeze.
The workshop incorporated exercises and a discussion on freezing periods, methods and tips; fridge
storage and storage tips including ingredient specific advice; planning a week of meals with leftovers
and what is stored in the cupboard/fridge as well as portioning quantities and tools1. At our
workshop we demonstrated how most parts of vegetable can be eaten, and what cannot. In
addition, we used frozen bread to toast whilst having a lunch with all participants at the end of the
workshop. Because of concern about safety aspects of rice consumption both our workshops
discussed storage, re-heating and freezing tips.
Our workshop goodie bags included, amongst other things, food and spaghetti measures, LFHW
recipe flyers, Lia’s Kitchen recipe cards & workshop recipes, food clips, freezer and fridge bags, food
storage labels and information about how to access the online LFHW resources and smart phone
App.
Methodology and Survey results
The observations from our survey are of qualitative nature because of the small sample of our
participants.
Survey design
We designed two fifteen question pre and post workshop surveys to help define the content of our
workshops, assess their impact particularly on food waste and money spent and to receive feedback
1 LFHW resources we used: ‘Lovely leftovers’ exercise from the trainer support handbook, and from the online WRAP resources ‘Too good
to waste: storage’ (act 7), ‘Savvy Storage’ (act 8), ‘your freezer is your friend’ (act 9), ‘Store and thaw’ (act10), ‘fixing perfect portions’ (act
13).
Figure 5- What would you find most useful to get advice and information on?
11
on the content of the events. The surveys were made available electronically through the links below
and paper copies were provided on request and at the workshops:
http://goo.gl/forms/mLXfg1epbu
http://goo.gl/forms/9kPVP6AYDU
They aimed to assess the impact and effectiveness of skills sharing (cooking at the workshop), the
recipes we provided, providing tools and online resource to facilitate food waste reduction, as well
the impact of a personal participatory approach to behavioural change.
In designing the survey we consulted LFHW officers and online campaign resources on survey design.
Furthermore, we included some questions from an existing LFHW survey. We believe we ended up
with a survey that covered the right topics but without overburdening the participant.
Response rate
We had 30 pre-workshop survey responses and 22 post workshop responses. Some of the
participants came from the same household so we accepted one response from some participants in
the post workshop survey. As an incentive to complete the post workshop survey we offered
participants entry into a prize draw for a free place at Lia’s Kitchen workshops or pop-up dinner (one
for each workshop). When we remove the pre-workshop survey participants who did not turn up to
the workshops we had almost 100% rate of response to the pre- workshop survey and around 85%
response rate for our post workshop survey. All participants were partly or wholly responsible for
shopping and meal planning in their household.
Food Waste reduction and Money spent on food
Our surveys monitored the number of food waste bags that were disposed and the money spent on
food the weeks before and after our workshop. As a result of our workshops participants reported:
An average reduction of 0.5 food waste bags they disposed each week. The pre-workshop
survey reports an average of 1.6 food waste bags each week (ranging from 0 to 3 bags). After the
Pop-Up Food Waste Café workshops we recorded a reported average 0.5 reduction in food
waste bag disposal, with some participants reporting a 50% reduction. However, some did not
seeing a significant difference in the waste disposal but reported that they managed to make
cooked food go a longer way. On some occasions households did not have a food caddy facility
either because of shared flats or because they had just moved into the house. As a result of their
participation in the workshops we passed on the details of these participants to Cardiff Council
to ensure they are given a brown caddy.
An average saving of over £30 in their weekly shopping budget. The pre-workshop survey
reported an average spend of £52 the week before the workshop (this ranged between £15 and
£150). Whilst after our Pop-Up Waste Café the weekly spend on food had reduced to around
£29 a week (ranging from £7.50 to £90). Most of the people seemed to achieve savings between
£5 and £15 but we also had some participants who stated the workshops helped them to halve
their shopping bills.
12
What we helped with most
All of the participants/households that fed back to us found the event informative and useful (figure
5). Whilst the nature of the survey means that figures on waste reduction and cost saving impacts
are indicative and specific to the workshop they still demonstrate that our activity had a beneficial
and positive impact on those who participated.
Fruit, vegetable, salad and bread remained the top types of food wasted but the percentage of
participants who reported wasting these food types more than halved after our workshops. Wasting
bread was reported to be more than halved amongst the households that benefited from the
workshop. The same was the case for the 18% of participants who reported they still wasted some
to quite a lot of fruit, vegetable and salad compared to around half the participants in the pre-
workshop survey.
The majority of participants (77.3%) used the advice and resources we provided them with at the
workshops (figure 6). They fed back positively on the recipes, advice and resources we disseminated.
For example, many made the banana pancakes and Ribollita soup the week after the workshop to
use up fruit and vegetables, and vegetable peelings and herbs were now being used to make
vegetable stock too. Many made use of all our advice and what they learnt at the workshop, for
example how to store and freeze food, with specific repeat examples of freezing excess fruit, herbs,
wine and raw eggs. The participants also reported using of food clips, measurers, food waste and
food storage bags, and labels that we provided them with.
Awareness of LFHW and access to LFWH online resources and smart phone Application
Our pre-workshop survey recorded a good awareness of the LFHW campaign (figure 7) mainly
through social media, other sources (including our contacts list and mailouts) and the internet
(figure 8). At the workshops, it was reported by participants that our marketing contributed to an
increased awareness. The pre-workshop survey also recorded requests for links websites that allow
people to find easy recipes for specific ingredients. At our workshops we disseminated information
on the LFHW website and smart phone application.
13
The week after the workshop participants told us they had a better idea on how to access advice and
information on how to save food (91%) (figure 9). But less than half participants reported accessing
the LFHW website and smart phone App we told them about (figure 10). However, many fed back
they were still planning to use these online resources, others had downloaded the App but had not
got around to using it, another fed back that the LFHW twitter feeds were really useful and a
corporate organisation was looking to register for a food waste event as a direct result of this
workshop.
Many participants have already cascaded information on the LFHW campaign and the tips &
resources we provided within their family and social circles. Participants reported sharing awareness
on the issue of food waste and information/advice we provided with between three and over twenty
acquaintances, colleagues and family members. We estimate that it is likely that our LFHW messages
and our tips have reached an additional 160 people. Participants fed back a preference for
participatory events that take a ‘hands on’ approach in helping them reduce food waste. We have
already been contacted by an advisory service asking us to provide a similar workshop to their
audience.
14
Lessons Learnt and other feedback
Feedback on workshops
Most of the participants told us they would not change a thing about our workshop but they offered
feedback on what they would like to see covered in future events delivered by us. We would be very
interested in discussing with you how we can take these forward with the support of LFHW.
Obstacles in booking venues
In planning the event we approached around ten different venues with preference to community
halls in Roath and Adamsdown, run by the council and different religious institutions to increase
inclusivity and outreach beyond our existing contact lists.
The main obstacle we came across was the interpretation of fire and health and safety regulations.
For example despite all our assurances, documentation and insurance, one of our preferred venues,
the local authority run Penylan Community Centre, did not accommodate our workshops. We feel
that this is an obstacle that needs to be overcome in the delivery such events as venues such as
Penylan Community Centre are ideal and accessible locations which if used could increase the
outreach and involve individuals, groups and families that would benefit from development of skills
in similar workshops.
In response to fire regulations and health and safety restrictions we adapted our workshop delivery
to switch from gas to electric hobs. This decreased our costs overall and also the risks of running
cooking workshops in indoor enclosed spaces.
LFHW and WRAP support
We would like to thank you for retweeting and sharing some of the information we shared
through social media. We are particularly pleased with the support provided by Jo Tarling and
Natasha Poole, both electronically and in person (through Jo’s participation at the roadshows
and her training to our volunteers).
We think that we would have benefited from further coverage and awareness through further
dissemination of our links and Facebook post of the LFHW_UK Community Facebook Page.
Whilst we tagged the page repeatedly in our posts, and noticed that there was an abundance of
mentioned to the England based roadshows and events, our workshops and blogs were not
mentioned on the page.
Project Media coverage
Our press release was picked up by Wales online, was advertised in Buzz Magazine and was
promoted at various blogs:
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/anti-food-waste-cafes-pop-up-8316744
(25 shares)
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/whats-on/food-drink-news/sprouts-looking-bit-ropey-learn-
8399730 (94 shares).
15
http://foodcardiff.com/pop-food-waste-cafes-cardiff/
http://www.itsoncardiff.co.uk/Popups/index.aspx?FCID=53056
One of our participants’ blogged about the event. In addition to that Lia’ Kitchen and Green City
Events both blogged throughout the campaign to increase dissemination of LFHW messages:
http://lethereatclean.com/2015/02/pop-up-waste-cafe-cardiff/
http://liaskitchen.com/2015/03/07/practice-what-i-preach/ (12 share on Facebook and 15
shares on twitter)
http://liaskitchen.com/2015/02/11/the-savvy-soup-called-ribollita/ (15 shares)
http://liaskitchen.com/2015/02/17/egg-and-banana-pancakes/ (24 shares)
http://www.greencityevents.co.uk/pop-up-food-waste-cafe-photo-blog/
http://www.greencityevents.co.uk/love-food-lias-kitchen/
We invited Media Wales and MADE Cardiff TV to our roadshows and our second workshop on 21
February but unfortunately even though Media Wales was booked at our event they did not turn up.
Lia’s Kitchen Facebook pages LFHW reached out to:
Nearly 1,700 Facebook users through our event posts and tips.
Nearly 750 Facebook users on the day of our Roath roadshow event on 17 January.
Over 500 Facebook users through our recipes, photo blogs and through the blog of our
participant blogger.
Lia’s Kitchen Website was another way in which we raised awareness of the LFHW messages and
projects:
Lia’s Kitchen workshop LFWH events pages were shared over 45 times on Facebook and
twitter.
Lia Kitchen and LFHW related pages and posts were accessed over 600 times in 2015 and at
the end of December 2014.
We commissioned a short video clip which narrates our collaboration in this project and has
documented one of our two workshops. This can be used to demonstrate how cooking workshops
could become a more central aspect of the LFHW campaign across the UK. We aim to use this video
to tell the story of our collaboration with LFHW but to also, hopefully, increase interest in potential
similar events in the future.
Future workshops
We have very positive feedback from the workshops that showed demand for additional events. This
was further evidenced by the number of additional workshop attendance enquiries and people we
could not accommodate at our workshop because of space and delivery limitations.
16
This time we also had a restriction in accommodating families and children and should we do more
similar workshops in the future we could consider how to accommodate a child friendly space and
activities that would enable parents with childcare restrictions to join future events.
Lia Moutselou
Lia’s Kitchen , https://liaskitchen.com, [email protected], 07870131558