low-pressure membrane contactors for carbon …...low-pressure membrane contactors for carbon...
TRANSCRIPT
Low-Pressure Membrane Contactors for Carbon Dioxide Capture
DE-FE0007553
−Richard Baker, Ken Chan, Brice Freeman, Don Fulton, Jennifer Ly,
Pingjiao Hao, Jay Kniep, Vincent Nguyen, Ivy Huang (MTR)
−Glenn Lipscomb, Terry Lou (University of Toledo)
NETL CO2 Capture Technology Meeting Thursday July 31, 2014
Project Overview
• Award name: Low-Pressure Membrane Contactors for CO2 Capture • Project period: 10/1/11 to 9/30/14 • Funding: $ 3.0 million DOE; $1.0 million MTR • DOE project manager: Mike Mosser • Participants: MTR, University of Toledo • Project scope: Develop compact large membrane area (> 500 m2), low
pressure drop plate-frame sweep module for CO2 capture application. • Project plan: The key project work organized by budget period is as follows:
– BP1: Construct prototype laboratory modules (20m2), select components, develop fabrication technology.
– BP2: Scale up production to 1m x 1m pilot scale modules (100m2), demonstrate with lab test system that modules meet CO2 separation performance and pressure drop targets.
– BP3: Scale up to full scale module (> 500 m2), show modules meet all performance targets. Be ready to test at NCCC.
2
MTR CO2 Capture Team
3
Tim Merkel Director of R&D
Xiaotong Wei 1MWe Demo Project
DE-FE0005795
Prof. Glenn Lipscomb
U. Toledo
CFD – Tomography Studies Module Design
Membrane Production
Group – Steve White Jennifer Ly
Engineering Support –
Saurabh Pande Don Fulton
Module Production and Testing –
Ivy Huang Ken Chan
Vincent Nguyen
Device Development
Brice Freeman Membrane Hybrid Project
DE-FE0013118
Pingjiao Hao MTR CFD &
U Toledo Liaison
Jay Kniep Project Manager
Richard Baker Project PI
DE-FE0007553
4
A separation is performed at a minimal energy cost.
The MTR Membrane Contactor
A Way of Generating an Affordable (Partial) Pressure Difference
10
Coal Power Plant with a Membrane CO2 Pre-Concentrator
5
Coal Power Plant with a Membrane CO2 Pre-Concentrator
6
Current Approach Uses Modified Spiral-Wound Modules
7
Each module contains 20 to 50 m2 of membrane.
Module Pressure Drop is Key
• 1 psi = 3 MWe for a 500 MWe plant
• Best spirals still have a 4 psi pressure drop on the sweep side
• Need to develop a module for this application
8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sweep SidePressure Drop (psi)
Year
Spiral Wound Modules
Plate and Frame Module
Project TargetArea
The Issues and Solutions
9
– Skid packing density
– Manifolding
– Footprint
– A sweep process
– Needs low pressure drop
Large area modules, compact skids
Needs wide, straight channels on both sides of the membrane
Two Membrane Contactor Designs
10
Countercurrent
Cross-flow
– Most efficient – Difficult to make
– Uses 40% more membrane area – Easier to make
Progress to Date (DE-FE0007553)
11
• BP1 – Footprint: 0.3 m x 0.6 m – Modules: 20 m2
• BP2 and BP3 – Footprint: 1 m x 1 m – Modules: 100 m2
100 m2 Membrane Module
12
100 m2 Membrane Module Details
• 60 – 70 individual membrane envelopes
• Weighs 100 kg completely assembled
• Has ~200 m of glue line seals (no leaks)
• Has the equivalent membrane area of 5 – 8” spiral wound membrane modules
• Sweep side pressured drop <0.5 psi
13
Our Concept
14
A single 100 m2
module element
50 Module elements connected to make a 5000 m2 module
Large-Area Plate-and-Frame Modules
15
Membrane Module Skid Total Cost
$20/m2 $10/m2 $20/m2 $50/m2 + + =
50 Module elements connected to make a 5000 m2 module
16
Feed Direction
Sweep Direction
Membrane Contactor with Vessel
Test System
Membrane Module and Test System
500 m2 Skid for Testing at NCCC
17
18
100 m2 Module Sweep Side Pressure Drop
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 20 40 60 80 100
Sweep air flow rate (SCFM)
Sweep sidepressure drop
(psid)
Module #8
2.5 psig
5 psig
12.76 psig
Feed side pressure
8 psig
12 psig
Sweep side air flow and pressure drop changes with membrane characteristics and operating conditions, but the effect is consistently small.
1 bar feed 1000 gpu
1 bar feed 2000 gpu
2 bar feed 1000 gpu
Module operating conditions
Various Module Flow Designs
Design
Membrane area needed compared to
countercurrent Countercurrent (CC)
100%
Cross-flow (XF)
137%
Partial countercurrent
108% Series cross-flow
126%
19
What’s Next
Accomplishments to Date • 100 m2 defect free modules made • Pressure drops reduced to < 0.5 psi. • Five module (500 m2) skid made and ready for
NCCC test. Next Steps • Test five module skid at NCCC • Scale up plan to get module skid cost to $50/m2
implemented. 20